Comments by "" (@jojowynne233) on "Verdict in the Movie Popcorn Murder Trial" video.

I am so sad for Nicole Oulson. My heart truly breaks for her ❤️ I watched most of this trial and the defence did a really good job. The prosecutor the cross examined Curtis Reeves came across like a pedantic hot head. The popcorn issue always came across as secondary. It wasn’t thrown. It fell from Reeves hand after he perceived Oulson had either hit him or thrown a cell phone at him. Not thrown popcorn at him like it has been portrayed in the media. Chad Oulson did not deserve to die. I understand the not guilty verdict means Reeves isn’t criminally responsible but it doesn’t mean Chad deserved to die so you shouldn’t say it like that. All I can tell you from watching most of the case is I’m not surprised that Reeves was found not guilty.
46
Agreed Randy! I was disgusted by that statement too!
3
Reeve’s defence team were brilliant. They got him the Not Guilty verdict with their efforts and experts.
2
@davidsmiths5471 who knows? Either could’ve left. Reeve’s should’ve not been such a whiner about a phone light in the first place. It’s not like the movie was on, only previews. Maybe Oulsen should’ve continued to ignore him like his wife said he did. Nicole claimed that Chad wasn’t angry or upset, but he must’ve been to jump up and turn to Reeves. 🤔
2
@Anne-pk8gs yes, the bullet hit her finger because as Chad stood up and turned towards Reeves, Nicole had reached towards his shoulder in an attempt to stop him or tell him it wasn’t worth it, but it all escalated quickly. I did find her testimony strange in that she said after being pestered by Reeves to put the phone away, then being told he was going to get the manager, Nicole testified that Chad made no comment about it. I know I would’ve said to a friend or partner if I’d been harassed by an old guy behind me to put my phone away etc I would’ve at least said “silly old fart” or “what a nutter” It just didn’t make sense, even if you weren’t angry that you wouldn’t comment to the person you were with. Nicole testified he (Chad) said nothing. 🤔
1
@glamdolly30 nowhere did I “brand” Chad Oulsen as the aggressor. In my comments I said all I can tell you from watching the trial (evidence presented and witnesses) is that I’m not surprised that the verdict came back Not Guilty.
1
@davidsmiths5471 Reeves was asked that question. He said once he’d spoken to the manager it was now between Management and Oulsen and he wasn’t concerned at that stage as he just presumed due to Oulsen’s swearing that he was just being “mouthy”. He wasn’t prepared and didn’t see the escalation coming. He also stated (after being asked) that in hindsight he wished he had just moved, he wished the whole thing never happened.
1
@davidsmiths5471 sorry, I just realised you wrote “she”. In her testimony Nicole claimed that Chad totally ignored Reeves. He never said a word back, and he never said a word to her about him either. They didn’t leave because they weren’t bothered by Reeves.
1