Comments by "Pottenger\x27s Human" (@LTPottenger) on "Task & Purpose" channel.

  1. Too late to be concerned we already lost and new tanks and ifvs are hilarious ideas in 2025. What if they make a drone that shoots an AP round? Another waste of 200 billion
    7
  2. They would probably send them in staggered in small amounts just to cause delay of a big counterattack and make it so it's impossible to just wait out any attack completely. Then they can keep this up til bombers arrive and they can circle and neutralize any launch. Of course we would be doing things in the meantime so it is unclear how this would all play out in the end but that is the obvious thing to do if they were serious about an all out war.
    4
  3. It proves some of them selected for the task will work. I would not count on all or even most of them working at this point.
    3
  4. Unlike collapsing west they can make more
    2
  5.  @mkuehn5450  You might be having a stroke if you think keeping land private is socialism. Corporations are socialist constructs that promote all its values.
    2
  6.  @MatsNorway  No you found only one here with a brain
    1
  7. And crimensky is a legitimately elected leader too I saw it on tv
    1
  8.  @davidburton9690  I don't doubt their warheads are all charged, they have cheap labor and more functioning reactors than the rest of the world put together and the reactors are the hard part. I don't doubt our new missiles will work either but the very old ones are not likely to and that is the vast majority. Russia has some brand new ones and all those will work. The rest are older but still younger than those in US. So it is sort of a crapshoot but my guess is both will have at least 50% success, out of the thousands of missiles.
    1
  9. When they all run on usb sticks we will be in trouble
    1
  10.  @tonycavanagh1929  stop watching msnbc
    1
  11. or anywhere else, or any corporation own rural or suburban land
    1
  12.  @MrMontanaNights  No, that's totally wrong. It takes time to respond and even detect and if they launch all at once then the missiles aimed at the bunkers could neutralize the whole launch and they can do that even after they launch. With the new mach 20 missiles they won't have much detection time at all especially since they also fligh low altitude. They would never launch a full scale assault on the bunkers that's just stupid. They will do something like what I said, or they will possibly ignore them completely. The attack would hit all the air bases and ports as the first strike for certain, and those are easy to take out quickly with no chance to get the planes off if they are not up already. Then they will hit all over bases and military factories, then the power stations and rail. While USA targets mainly cities this is stupid and pointless, and russia or china won't do this. The cities will just be prisons once the food and electric are gone. If a war like this happens USA is toast and there is questionable chance to even be able to respond.
    1
  13.  @weir-t7y  In fantasy land. I just explained why they can't.
    1