Comments by "V K" (@VK-md7jm) on "Jaishankar 'Confronts' Biden With CAA-Like Examples In U.S; ‘Lautenberg Amendment...’ | Watch" video.

  1.  @ilovemybharat12  Criticism is fine when it is legitimate. In this case, US Diplomats & spokesperson got exposed as HYPOCRITE and shamed. CAA is a milder version of LAUTENBERG AMENDMENT in the United States which enables citizenship to identified persecuted religious minorities in Soviet Union, Iran etc. Under this law - ‘persecuted religious’ minorities like Jews, Christians, Baha’ is fleeing Iran to jump the queue to gain citizenship in USA. The LAUTENBERG-SPECTER AMENDMENTS positively discriminates among minorities by creating a ‘reasonable classification’ to EXCLUDE the Muslim majority. When USA can do it why can't India.
    50
  2. Spot on.
    2
  3. EAM did the right thing. He exposed the HYPOCRISY of the US Diplomats and US Spokesperson. CAA is a milder version of LAUTENBERG AMENDMENT in the United States which enables citizenship to identified persecuted religious minorities in Soviet Union, Iran etc. Under this law - ‘persecuted religious’ minorities like Jews, Christians, Baha’ is fleeing Iran to jump the queue to gain citizenship in USA. The LAUTENBERG-SPECTER AMENDMENTS positively discriminates among minorities by creating a ‘reasonable classification’ to EXCLUDE the Muslim majority. When USA can do it why can't India.
    1
  4.  @descoutinho-e1y  BJP has gained prominence because Hindus have been suppressed for 1000 years (even after 1947 by Congress) and Hindus are realizing it and waking up. USA is only 400-500 years and was not invaded by Islamic invaders. Spain went through a similar situation like India where in Middle Ages, Islamic invaders tore down churches and built mosques on top of them. Now Spainards have reclaimed them and built churches. Indians and Hindus have been slow but on the right path. I have been researching South Asian History for a very long time and you need to learn a thing or two before making comments. * India and Hinduism have existed for more than 5000 years. Muslims came only 1100 years back as invaders, looters, occupiers of India (which was spread from Afghanistan to Bangladesh) and converted locals by force, destroyed their temples, educational institutions (Nalanda, Takshila etc.), burnt their libraries. “The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history.“ — Will Durant, book The Story of Civilization Will Durant, The Story of Civilization: Our Oriental Heritage page 459. * Most of the Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi muslims are children of those Hindu women who were raped and/or forcefully converted during Ghaznawi, Ghauri, Khalji, Tuglaq, Mughal, Nadir Shah, Abdali rule. It is a historical fact and cannot be disputed. Few Hindus converted to Islam for benefit. Only few thousand muslims came on horses; Hindu men were made slaves or killed. * India was divided in 1947 to accede to the demand of Muslims of homeland (on the principle - they cannot exist with other religions and need 'land of the pure' - no other religion) and two Muslim countries were born – Pakistan and Bangladesh (in 1971 from E. Pakistan). Hindus thought they will have peace after giving 30% of the land to muslims who were only 16% at that time. The matter should have been SETTLED FOREVER. Muslims had a better deal in partition. Many Muslims stayed back. 3 million people died in 1947 in which majority of them were Hindus & Sikhs. Very few muslims (only Asfaq Ullah Khan is the prominent name) fought for independence; rest fought British to get independent country and got their prize West Pakistan & East Pakistan. The transfer of population should have been completed as per the terms of Partition. * In Pakistan, many Hindu temples have been destroyed, converted in chicken shops, madrasas and are being used for other activities. * Why do muslims in India disrupt their religious processions and religious festivals??? Why can't Hindus reclaim their temples and practice their religion even after giving 30% of the land and sacrificing 3 million lives???
    1
  5.  @descoutinho-e1y  BJP has gained prominence because Hindus have been suppressed for 1000 years (even after 1947 by Congress) and Hindus are realizing it and waking up. USA is only 400-500 years and was not invaded by Islamic invaders. Spain went through a similar situation like India where in Middle Ages, Islamic invaders tore down churches and built mosques on top of them. Now Spainards have reclaimed them and built churches. Indians and Hindus have been slow but on the right path. I have been researching South Asian History for a very long time. * India and Hinduism have existed for more than 5000 years. Muslims came only 1100 years back as invaders, looters, occupiers of India (which was spread from Afghanistan to Bangladesh) and converted locals by force, destroyed their temples, educational institutions (Nalanda, Takshila etc.), burnt their libraries. “The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history.“ — Will Durant, book The Story of Civilization Will Durant, The Story of Civilization: Our Oriental Heritage page 459. * Most of the Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi muslims are children of those Hindu women who were raped and/or forcefully converted during Ghaznawi, Ghauri, Khalji, Tuglaq, Mughal, Nadir Shah, Abdali rule. It is a historical fact and cannot be disputed. Few Hindus converted to Islam for benefit. Only few thousand muslims came on horses; Hindu men were made slaves or killed. * India was divided in 1947 to accede to the demand of Muslims of homeland (on the principle - they cannot exist with other religions and need 'land of the pure' - no other religion) and two Muslim countries were born – Pakistan and Bangladesh (in 1971 from E. Pakistan). Hindus thought they will have peace after giving 30% of the land to muslims who were only 16% at that time. The matter should have been SETTLED FOREVER. Muslims had a better deal in partition. Many Muslims stayed back. 3 million people died in 1947 in which majority of them were Hindus & Sikhs. Very few muslims (only Asfaq Ullah Khan is the prominent name) fought for independence; rest fought British to get independent country and got their prize West Pakistan & East Pakistan. The transfer of population should have been completed as per the terms of Partition. * In Pakistan, many Hindu temples have been destroyed, converted in chicken shops, madrasas and are being used for other activities. * Why do muslims in India disrupt their religious processions and religious festivals??? Why can't Hindus reclaim their temples and practice their religion even after giving 30% of the land and sacrificing 3 million lives???
    1
  6.  @descoutinho-e1y  India and Hinduism have existed for more than 5000 years. Muslims came only 1100 years back as invaders, looters, occupiers of India (which was spread from Afghanistan to Bangladesh) and converted locals by force, destroyed their temples, educational institutions (Nalanda, Takshila etc.), burnt their libraries. * BJP has gained prominence because Hindus have been suppressed for 1000 years (even after 1947 by Congress) and Hindus are realizing it and waking up. USA is only 400-500 years and was not invaded by Islamic invaders. Spain went through a similar situation like India where in Middle Ages, Islamic invaders tore down churches and built mosques on top of them. Now Spainards have reclaimed them and built churches. Indians and Hindus have been slow but on the right path.
    1
  7.  @descoutinho-e1y  When Spain can reclaim all the churches that were destroyed to build mosques, why can't India and Hindus??? Do you mean Hindus any inferior to others????
    1