Comments by "Ellie" (@ellie698) on "Triggernometry"
channel.
-
84
-
@tylerblack676
I'm thinking the same. When he was talking about different branches of surgery having different levels of psychopathy I thought EXACTLY that.
Surgeons who do these surgeries genuinely seem to be self-interested psychopaths.
The "harvesting" of skin from one part of a person's body to be used in another, the very many revision and corrective surgeries that are needed for all genital surgeries.... I've said many times that I think these surgeons are GHOULS.
To irrevocably fuck up someone's sex life, sex drive, ability to pee, ability to function... the amount of scarring and nerve damage they could cause, the loss of function... these surgeons seen to have little empathy for their patients (their "victims"??) or little regard for their long term mental and emotional health. They play god every day with people's bodies and their future suffering, physical and psychological. It's a profitable racket for unscrupulous, psychopathic surgeons who "sell" an unrealistic dream of perfection but deliver work that often needs multiple, maybe dozens, of further surgeries. Which clearly means more cash for them, more suffering and risk for the patient. They don't seem to care.
I think that branch of surgery DEFINITELY attracts psychopaths with no conscience and no remorse. They're just happy to exploit the vulnerable and desperate for 💸💰💰💸
74
-
41
-
36
-
28
-
24
-
23
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
32:03
thank you for your question here and the benefit of your experience.
Many so called "wanted" children aren't cared for and nurtured, loved and supported the way a child should be.
Many of the children Francis is talking about would have been spared a desperately unhappy life if the pregnancy that resulted in their birth could have been prevented or ended.
The doctor here, well meaning though he is, is being so naive and panglossian here.
More emphasis should be placed on contraception to prevent as many pregnancies as possible, ensuring that only people who really genuinely wanted a child and were psychologically and emotionally willing and capable of giving that child a supportive, loving upbringing that could help them thrive would actively choose to have a child.
Many children just "happen", people feel they want a child for all kinds of selfish reasons that have nothing to do with ensuring a happy, well adjusted member of society is raised.
The number of unwanted kids is heartbreaking. Why on earth would a society want to add to that because some idealistic doctor is a little bit squeamish doing his job?
If he doesn't want to get involved with terminations there are many other health care roles he could take on.
Let others do this job that he personally finds distasteful.
What is more distasteful is forcing a woman to have a child she doesn't want. In the REAL world, that Francis actually has experience of first hand, children in that situation have awful lives. In the doctor's naive and immature mindset, he seems to love in some kind of perfect world of he believes that unwanted children are all wanted *somewhere*. Meanwhile, in the real world, most of these children will always have the knowledge that they weren't planned, they weren't wanted and should never have been conceived and allowed to be born.
This doctor needs to stop trying to interfere in an incredibly complex situation that his rose tinted glasses are shielding him from.
I always made sure i took every care not to get pregnant but if i had i would have had the earliest termination i could possibly get. Having a child would have been a disaster for me, but more importantly it would have been a terrible disaster for that poor child. There's no way i would have inflicted life, and all the suffering and emotional pain that an unhappy life brings onto them.
If a family want a child do everything to support them (as a society we don't help parents be great parents) but if someone is adamant they don't feel able to look after a child, please don't inflict an uncertain, uncaring, unhappy life on them.
That is far more inhumane to me.
Prevention is always better than cure, whatever the situation. Give kids the very best start on life.
And a planned and dearly looked forward to child has the best chance of that.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
21:50
It's radical feminists amongst others who ARE the adults in the room having the real conversations now.
We're the people, branded TERFs supposed "trans exclusionary radical feminists" or as I prefer "Tired of Explaining Reality to Fuckwits" who believe in the sexual dimorphism of our species, only two sexes and you can't change between them. It's impossible to "change sex", every cell in our body (apart from red blood cells) have our DNA in them.
So called radfems are forever lumped (by the woke) in with extreme right wingers now. Even though we, like Peterson are more left than right, the left being completely taken over by Marxist ideology.
To find radical feminism responsible for what's going wrong is not only utterly wrong headed, it's insulting to the many ORDINARY women like myself, who have never considered ourselves in any way radical but are now classed as radical because we believe in reality, objective truth and facts, instilling resilience and taking personal responsibility.
To say oh, it's all caused by feminism, and particularly radical feminism is utterly misunderstanding where we are at. Watch James Lindsay's channel, New Discourses, on YouTube to find where all the victim ideology, identity ideology etc is coming from. Grannon doesn't seem to be aware of this. He has his own hobby horses.
Grannon is incredibly behind the times here and as ever is stating personal opinion and conjecture as historical fact.
I used to watch a lot of his content until I started to realise that he was using his channel as personal therapy, but not actually learning from anything he was saying or doing.
Because he speaks with confidence, he always appears to have a grasp on "the truth".
I admit when watching content about narcissists quite some ago, I was taken in by the persona. Then after a while of watching him you realise he's just as clueless as the people he's supposedly teaching.
There are far more self aware and knowledgeable YouTubers on the topic.
See HG Tudor for a very clear, dispassionate rundown of the narc mindset for instance. He's done a LOT of videos about Harry and Megan lately but go back through the catalogue and you'll find some very good information from a fully diagnosed narc.
As you hear Grannon talking about making the same mistakes over and over in his personal life and realising he's actually full of shit, you see that he's just making it all up as the goes along, pretty much convincing himself that he must know what he's talking about because he has all these followers.
I never watch him any more, because if you watch him for any length of time you will see this pattern.
When he actually starts talking from a more humble, more honest "yes I always sound like I have all the answers but I actually really don't, I'm still learning", I might start listening to him again.
I've noticed that men tend to like blindly following other men who appear to have their shit together, without stopping to assess if they actually *do". That's why the Grannons of this world keep being successful even though they're just continually winging it!
The guy's a conman, and he starts by continually conning himself into thinking he has something of value to say SMH
I've followed his progress for a few years now. It took a while but I did realise after a while that he was full of shit 🤦♀️
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Since the 1950's, in America with the birth of rock and roll and selling movies to teens, the concept of "the teenager" was born.
Ever since then, teen-agers, a distinct period of life between childhood and adulthood, with money in their pockets and a new market to sell to the idea of the teen identity and which group to buy into and belong to became profitable to all businesses.
Whether you were a biker or a soul boy, a jock, a "cool cat" or "unhip", you had to pick an identity and buy all the clothes and music, and "stuff" to display that allegiance to the world.
In the 60's you were a mod or a rocker, in the 70's a hippy, a flower child, a straight working for "the man", a punk etc
In the 80's you were a New Romantic or a metal fan etc
In the 90's it was cool to be into britpop, the Manchester scene, into raves etc
What do kids have now?... Gender identity... You have to pick one!
Same need as teenagers to forge an identity for themselves. Whatever the decade you pick from the options available.
Then you grow up.
But this is the reason the "binary" has been fractured. When there's so much money to be made from the gender industry why restrict to two?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1