Comments by "Ellie" (@ellie698) on "Piers Morgan Uncensored" channel.

  1. I wouldn't read his book if he paid me
    179
  2.  @hamlet557  Indeed, but why have a guest if you don't allow them to speak 🤦🏻‍♀️ He just seems to treat his guests as someone to shout at. I hope the guests at least get paid well
    40
  3. Thank you so much 🙏
    27
  4. He's just a narcissistic self publicist
    26
  5. He knows how to play the silly media game, fair play to the guy.
    26
  6. I've never watched Joe Rogan. But if Trump is on, i will. I would absolutely love to see Rogan try to talk with Kackler Harris. That would need a lot of 🍿🍿🍿🥤
    20
  7. I'm a woman. I've always and only ever been completely horrified at the very idea of 50 shades. I've never watched any of it or read any of the books. I've never wanted to do either for a single second. What i heard about them in the media was enough to make me feel physically nauseous. Just everything about the subject is horrific to me. I will never understand "kink". If the partner you love, isn't "enough" for you and the love you feel for each other isn't enough for you, then you have issues that need addressing before you have anything to do with anyone else. You need help!
    19
  8. He identifies as a comedian???
    11
  9. There's too much pornographic content on Twitter. They shouldn't be ANY The stuff that's on there is absolutely disgusting
    10
  10. High profile people know the consequences of not conforming. Truly dystopian.
    7
  11. Why on earth would ANYONE vote for Harris???
    6
  12. What age is that?
    5
  13. Didn't you make exactly the same comment on the rabbi debate video?
    5
  14. But she caved 😐
    5
  15.  @amirrizer5069  Where do I start. But regardless of your personal views, it doesn't belong on a platform that children use.
    4
  16. Some people have no shame
    3
  17. His looks are too bland to be leading man material. I couldn't pick him out of a lineup. I don't recall ever seeing him before in anything. No idea what he's been in. 🤷🏻‍♀️
    3
  18. My thoughts exactly
    3
  19. It's a while since I've seen him interviewed and I thought, "he looks old" but piers says that he's 82 and no wonder. I had no idea he was that old. He seems quite frail
    3
  20. Agreed. They're an absolute disgrace
    2
  21.  @PodJeeMC  Have you seen it? Please let me know what you think. Maybe she's using his name to get her film talked about? It's a good marketing ploy isn't it hahaha
    2
  22. Thanks Piers, this bloke is an expert on everything isn't he. Mansplaining happening right there. He's so ignorant.
    2
  23. NdGT is a loon
    2
  24. Who keeps giving this presenter a job????
    2
  25.  @DrMcNinjaSixthGun  Ah, not heard of krimson rogue. A funny review sounds entertaining, thanks 👍🏼
    2
  26. Piers for goodness sake stop interrupting Dawkins and shouting over him, you're very tiresome
    2
  27. He's certainly not the seemingly flawless figure people hold him up to be. He's very good at controlling conversations, setting the narrative and argument. One of his favourite conversational tricks is to say "well then you might say x/y/z" and then go on to give an answer to whatever X, y or z was. As though he's seen and countered all the arguments. He's having the entire debate on his terms. All smoke and mirrors to cover up the things that have been left out. Like a guy showing you a card trick, distracting you with what he wants you to see and avoid seeing the things he doesn't want you to 😂 It amazes me that dummies can't see this 🤦‍♀️
    2
  28. She looks like a Spitting Image puppet of herself. How old is she now? 80?
    2
  29. I can understand her telling her sister maybe, but her mum? Who does that??
    2
  30. OMG, that photo of her under the bed? I hadn't seen that before. I don't care who that is, or how old they are, that is distasteful to me 🤮
    1
  31. Can't stand George Galloway
    1
  32.  @regbaskin2411  It's a word to mean "masturbation" I think it's an onomatopoeiac word to describe the sound made by the hand furiously gripping the male member during the throes of climax
    1
  33.  @dmh1812  So? I wanted to see what Douglas Murray was saying. He's always interesting
    1
  34. He's been cancelled by everyone immediately because they all know about the begins the scenes secrets that until now have been kept out of the media. They *know" he's guilty of these things and more.
    1
  35. I do appreciate listening towhat he says because his thoughts, ideals and conversations always have an element within them that is thought provoking. However, as a former lecturer he has obviously spent a lot of time on his own refining his thinking. He's had these conversations with himself, and the challenges have come from himself. He's not used to having dialogues with other people. He doesn't seem comfortable having actual dialogues with other people. He continually interrupts the other person rather than letting them finish their point. That is quite disturbing given that he's a therapist. I wonder, does he constantly interrupt his clients in this way? If so, he's doing the opposite of what a therapist needs to do to be an effective therapist... Being a therapist is about giving the client time and a safe, supportive, non judgemental, listening space to allow the client to give an uninterrupted voice to their thoughts.... in order to clarify their thinking, their feelings about what they are going through. I would be far more happy to listen to him if he gave the respect of listening to those he is interviewed by without butting in all the time. Watch him, see how often he interrupts. It's irritating to even listen to, let alone to be in the receiving end of. I always sympathise with anyone I watch him talk to. He is talking TO them rather than WITH them. It's uncomfortable to watch. Especially given his "I am always right" tone of voice. I'd like to see a calmer, more laid-back Peterson who actually allows everyone to articulate each of their thoughts before jumping in and cutting them off. It shows a lack of respect to the people he talks to which I find deeply troubling.
    1
  36.  @PodJeeMC  I haven't seen it and am not interested in seeing it tbh.
    1
  37.  @pwalk4160  I'm not saying therapy sessions don't sometimes require the counselor to offer a suggestion of a possible action. But as someone who has trained as a counsellor and consequently been counselled, the two go together with ongoing professional development and supervision, what a counsellor should be mindful of at all times is the difference in power dynamic. A counselor's role is to empower someone not disempower them. Like all relationships the counseling relationship requires rights and responsibilities on both sides. And a duty of care by the therapist never too overstep boundaries or think that they know what the person should do, better than the person themselves. The ultimate goal of counselling is to make the client's need for the counselor to disappear. The counselor's ultimate aim is to make themselves redundant because the client has developed their own inner resources enough to be self sufficient. We could talk for hours about this! Part of your disillusionment with the counseling process might be down to something as simple as a lack of the right rapooy with your counsellor. That's a huge factor too. You have to find someone you can WITH. It's a process and you're working together to achieve your aims. You are not a passive consumer of counseling, you are an active participant and should be able to say anything, express anything, including perhaps that you feel you need to be more "combative" in the sessions as you put it. You might find that if you find a new therapist you can really gel with, that you can explore those ideas with them and move to the next stage. Like I say, we could talk for hours about this. There's lots to say!
    1
  38. It's interesting to watch two people who openly admit that they have problems with listening enough and are concentrating on getting better at it. And they both admit that maybe are still working on it. That was refreshing to hear
    1
  39. He mentions Sam Smith for a minute. Click-bait video
    1
  40. This guy is living in the past. The tradition of handing the woman to the man used to be the case legally that she pretty much belonged to him. And on marriage, unless her family protected her assets with a contract, he would automatically gain ownership of all her possessions. See a video, love in Jane Austen's time on here But laws have changed since the 1800's!!! That bloke needs singer education. He's showing his ignorance. What an idiot. 🤦‍♀️ That's not legally the case any more. He's ignorant of reality and history.
    1
  41. 😂😂😂😂
    1
  42. Good god, who was that woman who dominated the debate?
    1
  43. Which UK cities did he visit on tour?
    1
  44. I can personally testify that even a small candle fire creates so much smoke in a very small space of time, you feel the effects of smile inhalation.
    1
  45. OMG did that clown really cite the Barbie movie? Is he under the misapprehension that is a documentary? Has he ever met a real woman or is he basing his beliefs on other camp gay men like mulvaney? For crying out loud. 🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️
    1
  46.  @plasmichoneytrip  What a pointless comment 😂
    1
  47. Wow, he doesn't look well
    1
  48. "grandioso" isn't a word
    1
  49. He's a bit of a joke to rock musicians tbh. The whole band are a joke band.
    1
  50. No change there then. I've never understood why people like his singing either. His voice is AWFUL
    1
  51. I agree with Esther, she looks crazy. She doesn't look anything like Madonna, if you didn't know it was her, you wouldn't realise it was her. Having cosmetic work done is an well and good but when you funny even look like yourself any more, you should realise that you've gone too far
    1
  52. Both Peterson and Markle grate on me 🤣
    1
  53. I'm a woman who REALLY didn't like Trump when he first came on to the scene before his first term as President. Now I'm fully supporting him against Kacklah Harris. She's embarrassing.
    1
  54. No idea who this bloke is 🤷🏻‍♀️
    1
  55.  @sirennoir258  I didn't mention logic. I outlined his arguing "style". Which presumably is the style he used in his lectures.
    1
  56.  @sirennoir258  My point still stands, "hun"
    1
  57.  @sirennoir258  You're entitled to your opinions and observations. I'm entitled to mine. My comment stands. Just ignore it if you don't like it.
    1
  58.  @sirennoir258  a propos of nothing
    1
  59. This is the second "debate" ive seen with Piers Morgan side with and defend Owens in preference to the person she's debating with. Why is he not an unbiased presenter? (Silly question i guess, Piers is incapable of that. He likes the sound of his own voice too much 🤦🏻‍♀️
    1
  60. Dylan's voice on that song has undergone more processing than a Barbie doll itself. And is about as close to emulating reality 🤣🤦🏻‍♀️
    1
  61. One has to be very careful how one frames a sentence like this. For a perpetrator or friends of a perpetrator of any crime to state that is was a "one off" or as the favourite get out phrase of politicians very often used to say "an error of judgement", these phrases are designed to diminish the act that is being referred to. So these phrases have to be repeated very carefully and a certain tone of voice can be used. Fiona Bruce was doing her job very carefully as instructed yes. To be honest, I would personally have preferred it had she said something like "Stanley Johnson claims it was a one off" it "Stanley Johnsons friends claim that this domestic violence offence was a one off". Both phrases are equally truthful but give that truth without unnecessarily undermining the seriousness of what it is alleged he did. It's a balance that needs to be struck. Personally I think the BBC script didn't get the balance right here. The statement came off as dismissive of the seriousness of an assault, perpetrated by a husband to his wife. He is not denying the assault but by adding the phrase "one off" it is a blatant attempt at minimising the seriousness of it. As perpetrators and their apologists do.
    1
  62. ​ @theresecosgrove930  Agree, Lolita is an incredibly unpleasant reading experience. But the writing is excellent. As a character study of an incredibly unpleasant individual it is a classic.
    1
  63. Tbh I think he's become more handsome with age
    1
  64. Piers, it's Gab-or not Gay-bor I admit to liking Maté. BECAUSE of the tragic and untimely death and very public life and death of his mother, I've no doubt that Harry is traumatised. How could he not be Harry needs to deal with this in private therapy though. Not in front of the world.
    1
  65. I never liked trump but better him than Biden!!!
    1
  66. Personally, i think Trump is continuing to develop into a great statesman.
    1
  67. Amazing conversation
    1
  68. I hope to God that he wins 🙏🏻
    1
  69.  @lizliz4186  The identity cultists are attempting to control thoughts, behaviour and speech. That's totalitarianism.
    1
  70. Mulvaney's act is a joke. Mulvaney is a joke.
    1
  71. Wow, what a biased interview. I thought I would be in Candace's side here. But having watched it, and Piers Morgan's obvious bias, tbh I'm siding with the rabbi. I've never seen him out heard of him before but I feel her was treated unfairly here.
    1
  72. Irritating. Won't watch another one after that ridiculous shouting match
    1