Comments by "Supernova" (@MrSupernova111) on "The Plain Bagel" channel.

  1. 251
  2. 87
  3. 81
  4. 46
  5. 31
  6. 30
  7. 26
  8. 21
  9. 20
  10. Good video on the theory and technical aspects of interest rate hikes. However, the rate hike is only part of the story and I would argue that the bigger factors affecting the economy, and as a result the markets, are inflation and the war in Ukraine. My takes: 1) The most recent US CPI inflation rate was 8.5% far above the Fed's 2% target. Clearly, the Fed is already far behind the curve on this inflationary cycle and one thing you didn't discuss was the velocity of the rate hikes. Sure, if the Fed only increases rates by .25% at a time then the impact on the market will be less pronounced than if they increased rates at .50% or higher. But then, what happens if the Fed continues dragging its feet and inflation keeps rising? 2) The war in Ukraine is adding more inflationary pressure globally on food and energy prices. Central banks might not be able to mitigate inflation with traditional tools which might lead to a recessionary period regardless of what the central banks do. The question might not be whether we enter an economic downturn but whether we have a crash landing or a soft landing. 3) I believe much of the middle class is being squeezed financially as much as they can handle due to insanely high (overvalued?) housing costs and inflation. Let's face it, a large portion of middle class people can no longer afford to buy a house because housing costs over the past twenty years have far outpaced wages. This means that millions of middle class people are one emergency away from a financial catastrophe which could bring down the entire house of cards down similar to 2008. For perspective, there were 2.3 million foreclosures in 2008. 4) Let's not forget that part of the stock market's gains over the last few years, at least in the USA, are due to Trump's efforts to get re-elected. Remember that Trump passed one of the most comprehensive corporate tax breaks in decades and pressured the Fed to lower rates in 2019 because Trump is a "low interest rate guy." We could argue about how much influence these policies had on the market but its undeniable that they contributed to higher market valuations. 5) During the pandemic we saw governments dump trillions of dollars into the economy. The effect was that the (US) market doubled from 2020 to 2021. If that doesn't scream overvaluation then remember that during the pandemic consumer spending and commercial activity dropped dramatically. In fact, in the US we had two consecutive quarters with negative GDP growth. Some industries got decimated and who knows many many thousands of businesses closed their doors permanently. The Fed estimates that 200 thousand small businesses in the US closed permanently due to the pandemic but the real number likely much higher. In conclusion, I think its very possible that we're sitting on the largest bubble we've experienced since at least 2008. It only takes one segment of the market to pull down the house of cards that the market is currently sitting on. In one scenario, perhaps, we don't have a full blown recession similar to 2008. However, I think its very likely that the (US) market is still very much overvalued and we will enter a recessionary period of some sort within the next 12 months. In pre pandemic 2020 the S&P 500 was at 3,380. Today, almost exactly two years later the S&P500 is at 4,400. This means that the stock market experienced a 33% gain in the middle of a pandemic while commercial activity and consumer spending took a massive nosedive. I would ask how is that possible but we already know the answer. Lastly, let's be honest, if the US goes into a recession we're likely to bring down much of the first world with us due to our global economic influence. We'll see where all this leads but I wouldn't be too optimistic about market performance over the next couple of years.
    17
  11. 15
  12. 15
  13. 14
  14. 11
  15. 11
  16. 11
  17. 10
  18. 8
  19. 8
  20. 8
  21. 7
  22. 7
  23. 6
  24. 5
  25. 5
  26. 5
  27. 5
  28. 4
  29. 4
  30. 4
  31. 4
  32. 4
  33. 4
  34. 4
  35. 4
  36. 4
  37. 3
  38. 3
  39. 3
  40. 3
  41. 3
  42. 3
  43. 3
  44. 3
  45. 3
  46. 3
  47. 3
  48. 3
  49. 3
  50. 3
  51. 3
  52. 3
  53. 3
  54. 3
  55. 3
  56. 3
  57. 2
  58. 2
  59. 2
  60. 2
  61. 2
  62. 2
  63. 2
  64. 2
  65. 2
  66. 2
  67. 2
  68. 2
  69. 2
  70. 2
  71. 2
  72. 2
  73. 2
  74. 2
  75. 2
  76. 2
  77. 2
  78. 2
  79. 2
  80. 2
  81. 2
  82. 2
  83. 2
  84. 2
  85. 2
  86. 2
  87. 2
  88. 2
  89. 2
  90. 2
  91. In the US there are different types of pensions and they have different levels of risk. A pension from a for-profit company is vastly different from a government pension. A pension from the local government and one from the state or federal level are also very different. Its highly unlikely that a pension from a local government will default but its possible as we learned from the City of Detroit. In that case, pensioners had to make concessions after the city declared bankruptcy. However, in the history of the USA a state has never declared bankruptcy and technically a state can't default on pension liabilities because the state has the ability to raise revenue through taxes. Of course, there is a limit to everything so the truth is that we have no idea what happens when a state defaults. That said, this is a very interesting subject that is largely ignored in the financial world and you could do it justice by putting out a well researched video with examples to discuss pensions and their liabilities. It could be argued that government pensions are insolvent in the long term because politicians make promises that they can't keep and won't be held accountable many years down the road when the pension starts to run out of money to meet liabilities. Pensions are under a lot of pressure to seek investments with a high expected rate of return to meet obligations. Some people believe that pensions are a multi-trillion dollar time bomb in the USA waiting to implode. What happens if a state level pension defaults? How could a multi-trillion pension time bomb in the USA affect the rest of the economy, taxes, pensioners, and our way of life? Should we be fearful? Should pensioners also invest in a defined contribution plan?
    2
  92. 2
  93. 2
  94. 2
  95. 2
  96. 2
  97. 2
  98. 2
  99. 2
  100. 2
  101. 2
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252.  @davidwebb2318  . I don't think you and I have the same definition of "extremely wealthy" when the median salary in the USA is about $60-$65k. Most teenagers and people in their early twenties aren't making near that much so building "extreme wealth" with their mediocre salaries isn't realistic. The only think that we can agree on is that time is important when it comes to investing. But if you opened your mind for just a moment you'd realize life is never simple. There is no reason why someone can't invest in a retirement account while they invest in themselves to learn new skills and find multiple ways to grow their wealth. Its hard to believe that you worked in high finance for 33 years and think that the best way to built wealth is by spending a lifetime doing meaningless work while making others rich. I bet you also think slavery is a very efficient way for slave owners to build wealth. Your entire argument is one massive contraction to the idea of using money/finance itself to build wealth other than to sit idle while life passes by. For the last time, there is more than one way to build wealth. Retirement accounts are just one component and quite frankly for most Americans its akin to slavery in exchange for peanuts. Your rant about taxes has nothing to do with my argument. You may have 33 years of experience as a finance professional but I have several years as a finance professional as well working in various capacities within the asset management industry. I hope anyone reading your comments realizes how outdated your views are. Good day!
    1
  253. 1
  254.  @davidwebb2318  . After 33 years doing finance you're still clueless. Essentially, you think that poor people are poor by choice. Maybe you should have taken some economic and social college courses to understand that the vast majority of poor people and lower middle class by extension are born into poverty and are not poor by choice. But , this conversation is about lifting oneself out of poverty and becoming financially independent. Your idea of becoming financially independent is to slave away for an entire lifetime and make other people rich. You clearly believe in a caste system where everyone should know their place in society and accept their reality. You clearly believe slavery is an effective way for slave owners to become wealthy. For anyone reading this, don't waste your entire life making other people rich. Becoming financially independent is about taking risks. Everyone has the opportunity to learn new skills and use those skills to grow their wealth. I know people from all walks of life that successfully took a chance to grow their wealth. What these financially educated clowns won't admit is that the vast majority of their clients are financially illiterate because they didn't build their wealth by managing retirement accounts. Most wealthy clients are business owners and they prefer to let the finance nerds worry about market fluctuations while they spend their weekends in fancy resorts as they travel the world. If you want to waste away your life in a stale office while you make other people rich then so be it. For those who want more out of life learn new skills and find a way to work for yourself. There is no one size fits all and not all ventures require millions of dollars in capital. Its been a good chat old man and your recommendation that every should slave away is pure nonsense. Good day!
    1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1