Comments by "चतुर्वेदी हर्ष" (@hershchat) on "Jordan B Peterson Clips" channel.

  1. It’s like listening to two troglodytes, one honest but not so good with words, the other crafty and spinning a mythology around being a troglodyte. Now we know how the myths came about.
    1
  2. Maybe they’re using truth in a technical sense and you in a pragmatic sense. That which actually exists, vs. our useable model of it. An example is that there are no “solids” in the world. In the common way of understanding it, to be solid is to be full of mass. In real objects, the mass is only 0.001% of the spatial Efren of objects. There is solidity- our perception that something is solid. There isn’t a solid. Pragmatically, our claim that, “this table is solid” works. It can be an empirical verity if we are testing at the gross level. And yet, the “truth” is different.
    1