Comments by "geemy" (@geemy9675) on "Engineering Explained" channel.

  1.  @Tosix98  interesting! where did you get all those numbers ? I would have thought initially rear motor would be used for low speed acceleration to take advantage of the weight transfer and additional traction in the rear like the taycan rear 2 speed transmission but it actually makes sense considering there is already 1000hp pushing on those rear tires and a lot of torque in first gears so it makes sense to use eAWD for launch with a shorter gearing in the front for torque. it will definitely need clutches in the front to disconnect the motors at higher speeds, the motors wouldn't like being spun above redline and the drag would be VERY significant. we already know from the video that the rear motor can be disconnected too. it's pretty unique to see a plug in hybrid with three electric motors that can be independently disconnected EDIT forget what I said I read too quickly and missed tje fact that you were talking about the nevera. the Bugatti website does have quite detailed spec. the three motor seem to be identical with 24krpm, 250kW PSM eMotors Bugatti gives wheel torque in the front (3000Nm total) and motor torque in the rear 240Nm if the motors are identical, it means 6.25 gear reduction in the front ! meaning the 2 front motors are able to spin up to 507kph ! I don't see a reason for them to not gear the motors for top speed.....this could mean the tourbillon is engineered to achieve 507mph too speed. It would make sense to one up the chiron, break the 500kph limit and production. car WR with a small 1% margin of error who knows what happens at those speeds maybe the tires expand?.... it's probably all based on simulations and dyno runs at the moment. it s likely that the "base" version will never pass 445kph limit. it makes sense to have one version for all out top speed an breaking records, that will only achieve top speed after several miles of straight line? but for real life, whatever insane too speed needs to be reached quickly enough, with some power reserve. not everyone has access to a privatew perfectly smooth track with 10 miles of straight line
    3
  2. 3
  3. 3
  4. 3
  5. 3
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. From my point of view, there is no debate over blended braking. every EV should offer it. the cost argument is irrelevant EV should offer different braking modes depending on driver preferences: -weak/strong regen braking on lifting accelerator pedal -creep mode vs coming to full stop when not touching any pedal -zero/weak/strong regen blended on the brake pedal depending on compromise between efficiency/battery heat management/battery wear/pedal brake feel/disc brakes life also -blended braking should feel as good or better than traditional brake pedal feel -I love my (2013 technology) fiat 500e blended braking pedal feel 100% better than my gas car in terms of initial bite/progressivity/braking power -situations where you need strong and frequent braking like track or fast canyon driving means also better range is much needed, thus strong regen is a no brainer -future of brake technology is brake by wire and replacing all the hydraulic brake/ brake boost/ABS equipment with simpler, quicker and more accurate electric actuators, with better ABS on all surfaces, and accurate front/rear / inner/outer wheels brake bias. all the system -I will never use one pedal driving as long as I have option for weaker regen on the gas pedal and strong regen on the brake pedal. I want to be able to cover the brake pedal when I feel an increased risk, without slwing down the car suddenly, or trigerring the brake light. And also be able to alert the reat driver with a vry slight touch of the brake pedal. Tesla one pedal driving does not allow any of this, and limits maximum regen to a very low amount.
    2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35.  @Tosix98  small but powerful! Bugatti did their homework , picking very powerful cells and sizing the battery to be just big enough to achieve the power they wanted, with virtually no impact on weight compared to the chiron and managed to make a NA plugin hybrid with same or even lower weight and 15-20% more power. this is very unique in the hybrid world I can't name a single hybrid, let alone a plugin, that weighs less than it's gas counterpart/predecessor. also smart aero engineering with the massive diffuser, eAWD/driveshaft delete, lower roof/narrower cabin designing the battery, they did not care about energy but power and weight. this is the only way for a very high performance hybrid or even EV. performance car are not about ramge. the battery density is low but 29C discharge rate is extreme. for comparison, the plaid powertrain is limited by battery output at 7.6C. it's a 5x smaller battery that m achieves 80% of the power. of course, there has to be compromises.. -energy density is 2x lower so the power/weight gain is about x2. that's still a 200kg weight saving. electric range is compromised but who cares. -the second compromise is like for any hybrid with powerful electric motors, the sustained power output once the battery is drained you have lost 45% power. if 250 is about the speed that can be achieved on gas alone with 1000hp, driving any speed over 250 will start draining the battery. the faster you drive the faster battery drains. this is probably one of the reason why the limited the top speed. 1000hp @250moh means 1350hp at 276mph/445kph this means about a capacity of a little under 5 min of top speed if the battery was full and depleted to 0%. this is actually not so bad when you consider a chiron would drains it's tank in 10- 15 min at that speed anyway. realistically, no road or track exist to achieve this anyway. they have gone to a (base) chiron that can go 260 for 10 min at best to a tourbillon that can go ~280 for 5 min then 250 for another. this doesn't even have an impact on a cannonball race, even the most reckless driver won't be able to drain the battery
    2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1