Comments by "Silk Dragon Music" (@Silkie_Dragon) on "Another Roof" channel.

Off the top of my head, I’d say the problem with trying to eliminate possibilities in an environment where the possibilities aren’t outset for you, is that you never know if you have in fact eliminated all other possibilities, meaning you’re still at the mercy of your own biases and/or limitations.
17
@JorgetePanete cretin
2
@Vgamer311 no..?? Just because something’s possible doesn’t make it true. Also, that’s a gross misuse of deductive reasoning. Lastly, why are you necroposting?
1
@Vgamer311 I’m not reading all that, but I’m glad you feel passionately enough about that I’m sharing to write PARRRRRAGRAPHS about it lol. You start your comment with “nobody gives a damn” so I may as well respond in kind lol.
1
@Vgamer311 I don’t give a damn
1
@Vgamer311 bud, I have absolutely no need, no desire to engage with you. Especially on a conversation that closed a year ago. You responded to me, so maybe you do, but the feeling isn’t mutual. So you can keep pawing at me for attention, or grow up.
1
@Vgamer311 imagine being the kind of guy who just keeps trying to be a part of this. You are welcome to come and post your comment. I am just as welcome to shut you down for forcing your brainrot into my feed by tagging me.
1
@Vgamer311 as an aside, you’re talking about “winning,” the fact that you see this as a competition is waaaay weird. Dunno who you’re trying to ‘win’ against here but go you I guess.
1
@Vgamer311 “you would have *this if you just *that.” “You would have *that if you just *this.” Are you STILL going? I’ve made my feelings on this very clear. Annoyance. At you. Curb your ego, I don’t feel even the slightest urge to prove something to you. You’re not that special. Edit: just so I’m clear. I have no intention of discussing my original comment with you. I don’t care for the subject matter at this moment, and I’m not going to discuss it with someone whose primary argument is born from deductive reasoning and doesn’t know why that’s a problem lol. I just don’t have the energy. I’ll tell you how this will go. The more you respond with annoying comments, the more you’ll be responded to with personal attacks. Because you annoy me. And the more you annoy me, the more I’m going to respond as such. So feel free to keep going, but you’re wasting time and energy. There. I’ve laid my position out perfectly clearly I’d say.
1
@Vgamer311 “I don’t know what more you expect me to say.” you seem to be under some delusion that I want you to say anything at all. I don’t. In fact, I’ve been express from the get go that I’d love for you to say nothing. If that much isn’t clear to you by now, then there may be something wrong with your mind. Your comments are an annoyance, one that I will continue to ventilate by snapping back at you. I’d never call you an “Abominable monster.” I’m sure you’re far from abominable or a monster. But your words, maybe you know something about yourself that I don’t.
1
@Vgamer311 much like you are free to comment how you like for whatever reason you like, so am I. I’m sure you would agree. And I don’t much care whether you approve of the ‘why’ to my responding, so you can drop the virtue signaling. Or don’t. I’m not in the business of caring about the ‘why’ to your responding either.
1
@Vgamer311 it’s a gut feel, basic social awareness thing, my guy. “This guy posted this over a year ago. On a low-importance topic. Will replying to this be conducive to good, productive conversation? No, probably not.” Would you like a guide on making guaranteed friends, too?
1
@Vgamer311 I didn’t say good. I said good, productive conversation. And I said it in the context of commenting on DEAD posts. Not all posts. You’re like a serial mis-apprehender. It’s impressive.
1
@Vgamer311 right. Definitely. Let’s be clear. I read your first comment multiple times. I TRIED to make it make sense. I wanted it to. It doesn’t. What it is is an unnecessary, otherwise, and pointless note that doesn’t mean anything, brought about solely for the sake of using up screen time. And your “it’s hilarious”s are very cute, but what’s actually funny is your ascription of my intent. “Intentionally misinterpret.” Look at you, jumping to a conclusion based on poor reasoning and evidentiary emptiness. Sort of like your “deduction.”
1
@Vgamer311 I appreciate that your worldview makes sense to you — but I’m afraid that is the case with every single other person on this planet. Hate to break it to you, nobody believes something unless it makes sense to them. So congratulations for conforming to basic common sense. You are welcome to continue on however you see fit. Truly couldn’t care less whether you view it as your fault or not, but needs must the devil drives I guess. However, as a point of fact, you have actively made it your own problem willingly. I’ve set out in no uncertain terms that every time you respond, I will ventilate further, and that if you wish to ACTUALLY disconnect from this being your problem, then don’t respond. And yet, here you are. So it is your problem, and you seem to like it that way lol. If you didn’t, then why are you still making it your problem?
1
@Vgamer311 (edit: my turn for a long one) I’ve not once ‘villainized’ you. At no point have I called you a villain or even eluded to it. In fact, I previously just disavowed ascribing intent, that applies to me as well. I’ve called you an annoyance, repeatedly. My increasingly blunt expression of you being an annoyance doesn’t translate into villainy, so I’m lost as to where you’re deriving this villain identity from. There’s a big fat line between annoyance and villain. If I made you feel like a villain, then I’m sorry. That wasn’t my intent at all. In any event, and as an aside, I didn’t mention it before, but you did so I may as well. You’re not the only one formally educated in this area of academia. Your level of qualification is not the reason I’m disregarding what you’re saying. In fact, I’m just quite comfortable in not being walked through your mind palace. As I previously said, I believe multiple times now, I’m not interested in discussing the topic, I.e the quintessential pain point of necroposting — we’ve moved on. We’ve detached from the spirit of the video and the comments by extension. While you’re invigorated having enjoyed a lovely commentary, I’ve long moved past that. Ergo I don’t see an an opportunity for an explanation for what may or may not have been a previously poorly worded comment that may or may not have been correct had it been worded differently. What I see is a someone dragging me back a year to rehash something that had concluded a year ago. As I said, didn’t call you a villain — I called you annoying.
1
@Vgamer311 I’ll pick out a few points here and leave the others to rest, since they’re going in circles with no signs of stopping. That being said, I’ve already said and you’ve agreed, necroposting is fluid. It’s a read the room vibe. Whether you want to read the room or not is up to you. But you’re at a point now where the room doesn’t need reading — it’s screaming at you. On the point of villainize: merriam Webster also offers the to transitive usage of villainize (as opposed to vilify) as to ‘play the villain'. As defined by Miriam Webster, villain requires there to be 1) an opposition to heroism, 2) a scoundrel’s nature or 3) evil, all of which hinge on malice. But I digress, one of many disadvantages of speaking through text, YouTube comments no less. Your assumptions just don’t stop. At what point did I come across as baffled? There’s nothing baffling about what you’re doing. Annoying is not baffling. It’s entirely foreseeable that you’d act in the way that you are. There exist any number of people people are just the same as you here. There’s nothing at all unexpected about it. I’d frankly be baffled if you DID stop replying at this point. That would truly be an unexpected shock. And I could have certainly responded by saying “Sorry, I’m not interested in this thread anymore.” So what of it? Does the gift of hindsight come with the gift of time-travel? Or are you just describing your ideal world to me? I’ll do just the same. Had you entered the comment section with “would you care for my opinion?” Then you would’ve had your answer. Unfortunately, I don’t speak like you’d like me to, and you don’t speak how I’d like you do. So I’m going to entirely disregard that entire paragraph because it’s silly. But let’s be real. Your ACTUAL issue, I posit, can be distilled down to a one specific issue, which is that I was mean to you. I hurt your feefees. You didn’t like HOW I shot down the opinion you offered. That’s tough, bud…
1
@Vgamer311 my word, that’s so sappy. I get it, you’re sad. What exactly is your goal as of now? I’ve been quite clear about mine, but all you seem to care about is that I don’t care about your deduction, and that makes you ☹️. What do you hope to leave here with today?
1
@Vgamer311 😂 Fantastic. Then so it shall be.
1
@khajiithadwares2263 My abductive reasoning infers that you are clearly a witch, because I live in the 1800s and only witches are this smart
1