Comments by "Cuthbert Allgood" (@SpreadGuts) on "Putin's chilling nuclear threat: 'We won't just brag about our weapons'" video.

  1. Hypersonic ones -- yes.
    15
  2.  @lookslikeshitdoesntit3745  It doesn't matter what they tested. US does not have hypersonics in production ready to operate. Russia does.
    5
  3.  @matimi0sbackflip455  Glad to hear a valued opinion of an armchair general.
    2
  4. @Dog boy It means everything since you can't defend from hypersonics. Meaning Russia can do whatever it wants without any fear of retaliation. And they will not use the nukes, obviously, those are a deterrent.
    2
  5.  @matimi0sbackflip455  Wrong -- Russia does not rely on foreign parts for their military at all. It's been like that since USSR and never changed. As for T-14 -- let's wait until the parade on May 9. We shall see who is right.
    1
  6.  @lookslikeshitdoesntit3745  No, I don't know. What I see is that Ukraine aided by all of the NATO forces and weapons cannot do crap against Russian army which hasn't even used any of their modern weaponry yet. I judge by actions and results, not words.
    1
  7.  @matimi0sbackflip455  Wikipedia says Avangardes are in production from 2019. As for the debunking part -- I wonder how exactly it was possible to be debunked, huh?
    1
  8.  @matimi0sbackflip455  Where do you get your info exactly? I wanna check your sources independently.
    1
  9.  J Silva  Non-hypersonics can be defended from. Hypersonics cannot be at the current technology level.
    1
  10.  @markusgreenidge8330  Actually they don't. Prove me wrong.
    1
  11.  @matimi0sbackflip455  I'm not sure how and where you see them, but that's irrelevant since you refuse to share your sources. Then again, what does T-14 have to do with hypersonic missiles?
    1
  12.  @dimone309  You got your 15 cents for the comment, Ukrainian bot, now go play in the yard.
    1
  13.  @dannyocean9129  "hyersonic yet have to fly 100 times farther" -- say what? The point is that you can't defend from hypersonics, period. That's why it doesn't matter how many nukes US have and where-- they are not going to be used. And this is exactly what Putin was getting at in his speech.
    1
  14. @Dog boy I understand full well how it works, my boy, as does Putin -- those missiles were created not to be launched but to be a deterrent to any possible open NATO involvement in Russia's activities. Geopolitics 101.
    1
  15. @Dog boy If you think of him in those terms, Geopolitics 101 is too advanced for you, you need geopolitics and world history high school level, mate.
    1
  16.  @dannyocean9129  You still don't understand that this is about politics and not technology, lad. Nuclear weapons exist as a deterrent not as an offensive weapon.
    1