Comments by "MANSORY" (@mansory7996) on "The Rise Of Sweden's Far-Left Militants" video.

  1.  @clonazko1354  The left identifies as Nazi, everyone who disagrees with them or has a different opinion. Fun fact communism killed more people then Nazism, but idiots think communism is good.
    13
  2.  a normal everyday Spider  1 Stop saying that no one accomplished communism, bc they did accomplish as much as it was possible to accomplish. It is impossible to make it bc of human nature. And tell me what aspect of "real communism " was not achieved in Soviet Union ? 2 But isn't that hypocritical that you praise communism while using 2 capitalist products at once (your phone or PC and You tube ) ofc it is, almost everything around you is a capitalistic product, that was possible to make ONLY in a capitalist system. 3 1960-1961 Berlin was divided between capitalist and communist Berlin. At first people where allowed to go freely from one part to another, then people saw that others in capitalist Berlin live better and they decided to stay. Soon more and more fled to capitalist Berlin and factories in the communist part were losing a lot of workers. So Soviets decided to build a wall to keep people in. You know a system is bad when you need to build a wall to keep people in. lol 4 I am russian, my grandmother survived holodomor and ww2 and ofc Stalin's regime she is 95 now. My parents lived in the Soviet Union. So plz don't teach me on communism, cuz i know how things were in practice , not like you fantasizing about a impossible broken system.
    3
  3.  a normal everyday Spider 1 "accomplised totalitarianism" more like the population saw that the system is not working, but the people in power wanted to stay in power, so they decided to mass murder and implement totalitarianism 2 What about innovation argument that i provided? there would be no innovation in a communist system and this leads to stagnation and stagnation leads to severe disadvantage against other capitalist countries. Example we have company a and company b. First scenario they are both owned by the state, the is no motivation to innovate because it’s not necessary, so they just produce their product. Second scenario they are owned by private individuals, they both are forced to innovate cuz if they don’t 1 of them loses the market and goes bankrupt. My second example is the history of Netflix and Blockbuster, Blockbuster lost the competition and went bankrupt. Because he was renting copies of tv series and movies for 1$ but charged people 40 if they returned it late, the founder of Netflix saw this and created Netflix. This is the beauty of capitalism, the battle between entrepreneurs makes out life better. 3 yes there were people who had a lot in Soviet Union, Stalin for example had 18 villas and a lot of cars. Leonid Brezhnev had also a lot of cars and guess what was his favorite car : Mercedes, u see not a soviet car cuz soviet cars where crap. 4 U say selfish people, i say human nature, we as humans are not perfect ( far from perfect ) this is why communism is impossible, Me , you , others we are all selfish to a certain point, now don't say otherwise cuz you will lie if you say so.( and consider high corruption,bc people are corrupt ) Even if we get a perfect person ( let's imagine ) he eventually will die and the next one will ruin everything. There is a solution to put an Artificial intelligence in power, ( so we people will be slaves to a computer code ) But even then, the system relies too much on everybody, so it will fail eventually , ( look no further then Chernobyl ) . A quick mention communism was tried not only in Soviet Union actually more of the word was communist then capitalist in Cold War era. So to say that in every country there were selfish people running the country is not correct. So we have got the 1 possible solution, and that is full robot. Yes it will work only with robots that don't have feelings and vices. I suggest you watch the tv series Chernobyl from HBO, you can watch it free on Popcorn Time (but it only works on pc), you 100% need to watch it . And it's good btw
    2
  4.  @soupeater7417  How?
    1
  5.  @clonazko1354  Nazism killed about 10 million people while Communism in China and soviet Union killed about 100 million: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/11/07/lessons-from-a-century-of-communism/ Mao Zedong (China) killed more then Stalin (Soviet Union) and Stalin killed more then Hitler. communism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Leap_Forward https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excess_mortality_in_the_Soviet_Union_under_Joseph_Stalin Nazism : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust China now is not communist even if the ruling party calls itself "Communist Party of China" however Venezuela is Socialist, they nationalized almost every industry, witch is the definition of Socialism.
    1
  6.  @soupeater7417  I said that they think communism is good, i didn't call them communists.
    1
  7. ​ a normal everyday Spider  watch Chernobyl. And i repeat this is theoretical the word is much more complicated than that. People will no innovate if they are not forced to, the risk of being hommeles is enough (and you don't have that risk if the gov gives you everything ). U need to understand that people don't like to think for themselves they want to be guided. "his means farmers and laborers would be having the most power in politics" this is called a democracy where the people vote. You probably advocate for no money also, well they tried it and it failed miserably https://fee.org/articles/the-soviets-tried-to-run-an-economy-without-market-prices/ Anarcho-communism where is no state, everyone dose what he needs to do and everyone is happy. But 1 day a farmer will decide to become the leader of farmers, and he will because remember people want to be guided. And soon they would want more power and more power, they will probably attack the factory workers to gain control over them( i know this sounds stupid but it its exactly what would happen) so this is how the sate will be formed, and we go back to the " selfish leaders " that destroy everything. You say "Production will be organized" and the "communism technology will be doing the labor" bu u understand that someone needs to organize it. And the one who will organize will put his interests 1. The communist technology needs to be built bc right now we are using only capitalist technology. So again the only possible solution is if everyone is a robot.watch Chernobyl
    1
  8.  a normal everyday Spider  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3Jkqqlpibo
    1
  9.  @nassiemartinez4399  Communism killed more people then fascism. Yet u think is good. U are blaming capitalism while using capitalist products like this site, or the phone or the pc that you are writing your comments. Almost everything that exists now its a product of capitalism. The 1% made their way up, people like Bill Gates , Steve Jobs, Elon Musk etctehy did something good for humankind. Now about borders : Open the borders us mexico and Drug Cartels like Sinaloa will come to kill and sell. Open borders will make Drug and human trafficking easier , and more profitable. If you join them that is a good thing. I'd love to see antifa being murdered by the Cartels they let in US. Y talk about 1% controlling everything, yet Stalin is Soviet union was 0.0000001% and he was like god, he had 18 villas a lot of cars etc.I am russian btw, i know better then anyone. His relatives were also living like kings. And he did not care about climate, Soviet Union was heavily based on earth's resources and communism is the cause if Chernobyl . But the best part about him was that most liberals are exactly the persons who he would have killed. Not even talking about trans or gay people. Where is Sweden now. I tell you its on the cliff of collapse it's welfare system can't handle the immigrants who profit form it. Like 1 in 10 has a job the rest are living on welfare. But listen to what a Swedish girl has to say : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZCCXZz5Esw
    1