Comments by "" (@genghissmith4949) on "Kirk Cameron says 'Homosexuality is unnatural'" video.

  1. 4
  2. 4
  3. 3
  4. 3
  5. 3
  6. 3
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. Headless Horseman I praise the lard I am now live my life free of you sorry religious nutters, who INSIST on trying to interfere in our lives when we neither ask nor need you to. ‘Concerned’?!? Hell no.....OBSESSED! You show time and again that you know fuck all about our lives, so let me enlighten you: I grew up in a religious household, and had a generally normal, happy time. Until.... I realised I was interested in boys not girls. That’s when my life went downhill...the priests bellowing from the pulpit that we kids were going to burn forever if we didn’t toe the line certainly didn’t help. THAT how evil you religionists are, sad bigot, shouting that garbage at children! I didn’t have a good time in my teenage years, which I spent in denial of my sexuality, and it didn’t help that I had no one to tell me it’s ok, no role models.....again, I praise the lard gay kids are getting the help they need these days. Luckily I found the strength to break free of your kinds religious insanity, and from then on my life improved immeasurably, to the extent that now, at 61, I can look back at my life with PRIDE. I am surrounded with love; the love of my family, the love of my friends....but most of all the love of my wonderful same sex partner of many years. And all because I made the right decisions when younger. Detrimental, pathetic pos? Lol no....my life is WONDERFUL! And society, those people you belittle so readily, BENEFITS from accepting us with open arms. Have YOU ever experienced love, sad man? No, I think not, smh.
    1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. vadouis Wow. Up to now I have pitied you your religious insanity, but with this latest tranche of utter drivel you have sunk to new depths....you DISGUST me! I don’t even know where to begin to answer all your insane posts, but here we go; In all your arguments against homosexuality you have, in fact, been a devious bastard (isn’t lying a sin?) in using OBVIOUSLY BIASED SITES OF RELIGIOUS AND RIGHT WING EXTREMIST NUTJOBBERY. For example, a ten second search of google told me that Eugene Abel is one of you lot, a disgusting creep willing to produce fake facts in support of his agenda. I can not find ANY expert in the field who supports his claims. Needless to say this garbage was from 1987, and we have a far clear knowledge (I.e. unbiased!) of homosexuality these days. In fact, with all your proof/links you seem to have delved far back in support of your twisted nonsense.... and are obviously too stupid to know your supposed to use UNBIASED AND PEER-REVIEWED LINKS to show proof. There is no such proof for Abel’s claims. You disgust me. ‘In a 2001(!) study it was found etc.’ So a small study twenty years ago noted that LGBT were significantly more abused as children....that is unfortunate but it’s telling that no detailed information was given as to why this would be. The article itself ended with the statement that more work needs to be done in this area, but nevertheless I have my own experience, and that of countless LGBT friends I have acquired over the years: the great majority of us WERE NOT MOLESTED IN ANY WAY during childhood. Your end statement relating homosexuality to being a danger to society is pathetic and wrong; It’s PAEDOPHILIA that is the danger you mention! You disgust me. ‘A 1995 (ffs!) issue of guide magazine stated etc.’ Wow....not this old garbage again. This nonsense was debunked long ago and I haven’t heard it from you nutters for many years....just shows how pathetic and desperate you are. The extremists involved in that article were promptly removed from gay organisations, as .....surprise surprise....WE DO NOT SUPPORT PAEDOPHILIA!!! Come on, creep, EVERY group has it’s unhealthy extremists....you of all people should know that!
    1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. vadouis You know, all the terms I have applied to you are fully justified and true. You HAVE NOT refuted them! Whereas the terms you have aimed at me are demonstrably false. Such as ‘disturbed’....the fact I have the time and will to counter your pathetic nonsense does NOT make me disturbed! A ‘bully’ (aimed at LGBT as a demographic). I have already explained that we are simply using the tactics other oppressed groups such as Suffragettes have used, and I note you haven’t labelled THEM as bullies....smh. ‘Paedophile sympathisers’ (again, as a group). For this claim alone you disgust me....I cannot possibly hold you in more contempt than I do now. We most definitely DO NOT hold with paedophilia you pathetic specimen, as we know how it damages/ruins the lives of the victims. Etc. Etc. NONE of the accusations hold true, and the discredited, utterly biased ‘surveys’ you have used ( many from the last century, ffs!) hold no sway with experts in the field today....with good reason. If the accusations you’ve levelled at me were true I would own up to them; I would OWN them! The claims I have made about you ARE true, so come on , vadouis, OWN them! Wear them with pride....they are who you are. And now I see you are calling me a ‘hypocrite’. Sigh, here we go again! Ok, sad specimen, answer this; HOW am I a hypocrite’? Is it because I have the utter gall to counter your religious extremism and nutjobbery? Don’t worry, I fully expect you to ignore my question just as you have with almost all of my others .... I realised years ago that your kind are rubbish at answering my inconvenient questions, lol.
    1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1