Comments by "Mosern1977" (@Mosern1977) on "Did the Big Bang happen?" video.

Yeah, keep on believing that story, it sounds very in line with how quantum mechanics work doesn't it?
3
Thihihi, calling out Cosmologist as a-scientific and creators of mythology written in mathematics is a very nice burn. Although it must be said that we do have some more info about the time between the initial state and the current state, so we can probably rule out a few mythologies based on actual observation.
2
@merlepatterson - It is up to you to buy the story about the entire universe starting out inside a Planck-length. At that point it is just math that has long been stretched passed its breaking point.
1
@merlepatterson - yes because without real data, they can daydream up new math. But an analogy would be that you see rabbits in a field and come to the conclusion that they double in population every year. So if you run backwards you'll get to 2 rabbits then 1, then 0.5, then 0.25 etc. And then you invent some magical explanation for how the 0.125 rabbit managed to get to 2 rabbits very quickly. Its the same thing with BB theory.
1
Yeah, it will be a hard nut to crack, even with Dark Fudge to explain that one. 250-300 million years is about one rotation of a galaxy, not easy to make a spiral galaxy in just one rotation.
1
@olasek7972 - well, don't need to even start a simulator to know you cannot make a spiral galaxy in one rotation. The basic cosmological model sets up the timing constraints here. Its is the cosmological model that says that these galaxies are a few hundred million years old, while it is pretty obvious they are already many billion years old. So the cosmological model is of course wrong. However, this is going to be such a damning conclusion, that they understandably will try their best to find another way to solve the puzzle first.
1
So here is the thing - the Big Bang theory comes from the hypothesis that the universe is expanding, which comes from the observation of galactic redshift. There is no observation for an expanding universe, it is a hypothesis. These fully formed galaxies now observed by JWST are of course totally impossible to be existing a few hundred million years after the BB. You cannot make a spiral galaxy in less than one rotation of the galaxy. Hence the BB theory is wrong, in other words the universe isn't expanding, and the (main) cause of galactic redshift is not movement. The implications of this for astronomy/cosmology is huge - like decades of science down the drain. So there will be a mad dash to try saving the theory of an expanding universe and BB with it. Just watch the train wreck in slow motion as JWST continue to push images of things that should not exist.
1
Well in cosmology the trick is to adapt your model to the latest observations, since the model never predicts them anyways, inventing some new Dark Fudge should your model completely fail to explain observations - and voila - success.
1