General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Jen Dee
COURT TV
comments
Comments by "Jen Dee" (@jendee1260) on "CA v. Menendez (1993): Erik Menendez Takes the Stand in Murder Trial" video.
@avalynnecrooks you do realize the show on Netflix was just a show, correct? not a documentary?
8
yet, casey anthony walks amongst us.
6
imagine if the netflix show was about a lifetime of being r—d by their dad.
6
@hannaholson9006 no! the second trial was not filmed. also, if it weren’t allowed they wouldn’t of even been allowed to talk about this! HELLO!!?? anyone in there? 💡
5
did we watch the same show?
4
@lisadee9279 please don’t give so much credit to the show. multiple people from all walks of life have been fighting for these men for decades. this isn’t new/because of the show.
4
you don’t? 🤡
4
they did. it was reported many times.
4
you sound ridiculous.
3
you clearly know nothing about sa in any degree if you are actually asking “how did erik as an 18yo allow this?” please seek an education.
3
read the room: your fictional narrative is boring and unbelievable.
3
you’re ridiculous.
3
she knew & did nothing. she deserved her fate.
2
uhm, that wasn’t a documentary…
2
especially given he was a child at the time. 😢
2
fact: they are victims. there ya go, start there. 😊
2
@BroDudeFun right? frog is the sociopath.
2
THEY ALREADY HAD MONEY. THEY HAD NO WANT FOR FAME NOR HAD ANY CONTROL OF HOW THIS WOULD ALL PLAY OUT. what a stupid stupid comment. can’t believe people this dumb walk the streets amongst us, but here you are!
2
the rich live differently. everyone was blown away that one of them bought a rolex, while already having 5 at home. no big shock. also, in the courts, it was found that only 1 brother “lavishly” spend—i forget which one—revisiting all of this. i think they grieved differently. even with what they did, does not mean they didn’t go through hell internally.
2
@exalt163 false. there were nude photos of them as boys, letters to family members, and multiple people in the family on the dad’s side that testified to hearing them be r—ed in the house, and another victim of their dad’s came forward. lordt almighty. you cannot be that dumb. you’re the reason people don’t (especially back then) come forward. do better. be a better person. you sound awful.
2
@exalt163 it’s 2024, stop with bs questions like that. seriously, have you gone back in time???!
2
@acc4465 you’re a bothered person.
2
…not a documentary…
2
nancykhan3574 not true. based on the comments in almost any video you can tell where people have gotten the information and how they feel and where they were/weren’t with the case.
2
considering it wasn’t a documentary my guess is no one. please get an education.
2
the jurors in this room? they were not the jury that put them in jail.
2
@hannaholson9006 that’s flawed thinking.
2
@-jovoc that’s you.
1
they didn’t deserve one.
1
it’s really not.
1
@Donyalicious false. there were still rules. just because they had a gigantic camera in the room doesn’t mean they had a free pass for what could be heard/seen on tv. you need to remember: things were different back then.
1
@Jtevkicksandcards nobody cares.
1
@ChibiViolin a third parties book written by someone on another continent would of been seen in a court of law as hearsay and nothing more. what a ridiculous thought process, lol.
1
@ritaeichler2066 there are literal voice recordings of their therapist being told. you sound delusional.
1
@JoeMama-tl4tr no. it’s shocking that you think they should be in there and that their ridiculous inheritance had anything to do with it. they bought rolex’s on the regular, they had money and everything they needed. they wanted to stop being prisoners of their dad’s disgusting ways. how base level do you think about anything? please seek a higher education.
1
@chrisstevens-xq2vb no, you’re clearly broken.
1
both. they did and you’re missing a lot.
1
you do realize how you sound correct? good luck in life.
1
@candisshonte projecting? you are literally saying you form your opinions on fictional tv shows. get an education, please.
1
the parents? agree.
1
racist.
1
they were absolutely justified.
1
@Moonlight-řæven relax. he has no idea this broad exists.
1
and imagine the whirlwind of … everything after finding out he was also doing it to your sibling—your first best friend. jeeze. no one even mentions that.
1
@Krysteljaay by the narrative of society at the time, to start.
1
@Krysteljaay also, there is ALWAYS a bias. it’s literally impossible for any situation to not have a bias of some kind. reminder: a bias can be good or bad or in agreement/disagreement with ANYTHING. however, it is ALWAYS there.
1
@Joriszx you’re stupid.
1
THEY ALREADY HAD MONEY. stop with this 1800’s bs narrative. so stupid.
1
@strawberrysunshine9752 again, seek an education.
1
@exalt163 their parents ra—d them and did nothing with that knowledge. sounds like karma.
1
@exalt163 liar
1
@exalt163 it created an immediate guilty. you cannot not allow a defense in a murder charge. that’s ridiculous. immediate bias.
1
racist.
1
@chrisstevens-xq2vb in this context, it does.
1
leave the table.
1
they already had money. there was no lack of it. don’t be ridiculous.
1
@exalt163 false. i already sent you a reply on another comment thread here. stop trying to gaslight people. that is not the truth of the evidence they had. total uneducated bs.
1
@3rdsmite766 again, you make no sense.
1
@vero9458 exactly. wtf is that broad talking about? she’s trying to sound intelligent.
1
raping multiple of your own children, makes you a psychopath. knowing multiple children of yours were being raped by your husband/their own father & actively choosing on a daily basis to do nothing to support them (in fact do the active opposite) makes you a psychopath.
1
@okkelly6207 as was theirs.
1
@wb6266 they were not there at the time. you can always tell by how they comment.
1
THEY ALREADY HAD MONEY. shut up with this 1800’s bs.
1
@joes.4149 lies.
1