Comments by "Incurable Romantic" (@incurableromantic4006) on "CNN" channel.

  1. Oliver must be so happy today - Trump is president AGAIN! 🤣
    54
  2. I hope he now follow's Kyle's example - and starts suing.
    38
  3. Rhetoric - "The occupation will last until they abolish the police" Reality - "The occupation will last until the drugs run out"
    10
  4. Just some out-of-work actor they tossed a few bucks at and then handed him a script to read.
    7
  5.  @xx_pjlikesmusic_xx  Nah - elections are "fortified" now to make sure the Dems always win.
    6
  6.  @lorihenrytaylor4438  "Biden interacts with the public often" Say that to the White House press corps, and watch them burst out laughing.
    5
  7. A reminder that the WEF is composed of psychopaths who see the rest of humanity as cattle to be coerced.
    4
  8. "Show me where it says protest has to be peaceful?" - Chris Cuomo, CNN anchor. On air.
    4
  9. Yeah - he wants to end a brutal war that is destroying millions of lives. What a monster. . . . . . . .
    4
  10. I'm just here to point and laugh at the spectacular levels of self-delusion these self-appointed "sophisticates" suffer from.
    4
  11.  @sethphillips6810  "Owning weapons or cars isn’t the problem if you are responsible" Ah - so the problem is the individual, not the weapon then? "Militia’s back then functioned as the arm" No that's completely wrong. There were regular armies in existence in the 18th century, including the one who the 13 colonists had just defeated to gain their independence. The founders were extremely distrustful of them precisely because they were tools of state power. Hence the 3rd amendment restriction on quartering. "“shall not be infringed” as if this is the only sentence of the entire amendment" It is. There is only one full stop in the 2nd amendment. The one at the end. It's not written in code - it's very simple language. "Republicans would tell you the only three sentences in the whole constitution are freedom of speech, right to bear arms shall not be infringed, and states rights while they ignore the rest." Perhaps if liberals were not so determined to destroy all three of those rights - it would not be necessary to keep repeating them. Most liberals think the constitution contains protection for abortion and gay marriage - proving they have never even read it.
    3
  12.  @sethphillips6810  To start with - learn to use paragraphs. "It’s the unregulated access to weapons" Clearly you have never purchased a firearm if you believe that. But at least you've dropped that very silly car analogy you were trying to push. "I never said anything about there not being standing armies in the 18th century". You stated that "militias back then functioned as the army" - thereby proving you didn't know what either of those words meant. You also clearly don't know that the American revolutionaries created a regular army to supplement the militia system. So those who wrote the constitution absolutely knew there was a difference even if you don't. I'm British and yet know both your history and your constitution better than you do. You even thought the second amendment had multiple sentences, which strongly suggests you've never read the constitution. The rest of your post degenerated into a long stream of woke clichés that are just as wrong as your comment on the revolutionary war. But I'll just tell you of the existence of the 10th amendment which states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people Therefore liberals forcing gay "marriage" onto states that didn't want it - was a violation of the constitution. but restoring authority over abortion to the states: was constitutionally correct So your home-work is to go read the constitution before you tell me anything more about a document that I've read and you haven't.
    3
  13. That's pretty normal for academics - reality is at fault for not lining up with their theories.
    3
  14. When CNN attacks you - that means you're getting close to the truth. Imagine thinking anyone is going to believe their anonymous paid mouthpiece is an "ex-redpiller".
    3
  15. Paul seems to have given security the night off, turned off the cameras, turned off the alarms, let his "attacker" in, and then stripped down for him.
    3
  16. How is war with Russia good for ordinary Americans?
    3
  17. Censorship's not so much fun when you're on the receiving end is it libs? You all thought it was hilarious when conservatives were getting banned didn't you?
    2
  18. Indeed - no one laughs at you for being wrong if you show humility in your predications.
    2
  19. "Private companies can do whatever they like" "Start your own platform" "Just don't be a bigot and you won't have a problem" Remember all those libs?
    2
  20. Then the mob would have dragged him out and beaten and or killed him. A worse outcome than one of the aggressors getting shot.
    2
  21.  @sethphillips6810  Actually your vehicle license is to drive on a public road - not to own a car. So the equivalent might be a concealed carry permit. "you don’t NEED a gun to function in the modern world" Self defence is a human right. Driving is not.
    2
  22.  @sethphillips6810  "okay and your point ?" The point is pretty obvious - your analogy that "you need a licence for a car so you should need one for a gun" - is a false one. You don't need a license to own a car, even though the US constitution has no clause protecting car ownership as it has protecting firearms ownership. "Owning a weapon is not a human right" Yes it is. As the constitution recognises. Without access to a weapon you cannot defend yourself effectively - and exist at the whim of those who are armed.
    2
  23.  @sethphillips6810  "can you legally operate a car without fulfilling these requirements?" Yes you can drive a vehicle on private land or on private roads without a license. Just as you can own a firearm in your own home without having a concealed carry permit. Maybe you should just accept you made a poor analogy, and stop trying to defend it. "You have a human right to self defense, and a constitutional right to own a firearm" Thank you. That was all you needed to concede. "the original amendment talks about it being for the purpose of operating a well regulated militia" Preamble is not pre-condition, and a militia means a body not controlled by the government. Otherwise it's an "army", not a militia. I find this frustratingly common with anti-gun people. They just repeat the same lines they've heard other people say without ever analysing them.
    2
  24.  @sethphillips6810  I'm glad you've figured out how to use paragraphs - we're making progress. - If you wish to know something about gun laws: the ATF website is probably a good place to start, as would any good firearms channel on Youtube. Both will quickly dispel your naïve assertion that there are no laws regarding firearms ownership. This was a mistake many Democrats made during the 2020 riots when they went to their local gun-store and requested "one of those assault rifles that you don't need a background check for" - and were shocked when they were told the media had in fact lied to them. What made it especially delicious was that many of them then failed the very background checks that they themselves had bewailed the supposed lack of. - Your continued claim that the army and militia "mean the same thing", strongly suggests your knowledge of the era remains close to zero. You didn't even know there was a regular army in the revolutionary period until I told you. "The same hill segregationist and confederates used to support leaving the Union and keeping segregation?" Err - no. They asserted the right of voluntary association to justify leaving the union in 1860. Hence why at the time the country was referred to as "these United States" rather than "THE United States". As to the other claim: 1. Who uses a law has no bearing on it being the law or not. 2. The 10th was also used by free (Republican) states to resists demands to return escaped slaves to slave (Democrat) states. Both of which you really ought to know if you have the qualifications you claim. A claim I find doubtful given the countless elementary facts I have had to educate you about. "Gay marriage is protected by the 14th amendments “equal protection clause” as per our Supreme Court. " As I explained to you - the 10th amendment refers all matters not specifically to the federal government to the states. Since there is no such referral of marriage to the federal government - the "homosexual marriage" ruling is, and remains fundamentally unconstitutional. As was Roe V Wade prior to it being rightly struck down. Your ignorance of your own county's history and laws is shocking. Or at least - it would be it were not so typical for members of your movement.
    2
  25.  @xvi1128  There's literally video of him doing it.
    2
  26.  @syyner1748  Why should the burden of responsibility be on law abiding people to avoid contact with criminals?
    2
  27. @N A Actually my standards for the president are delivering a stable economy, controlling the border, not starting wars, not being being massively corrupt, not being woke, not creating foreign policy disasters, not having dementia and not having an unhealthy interest in children. But since Biden fails all of those tests - I set the bar really low, and just expected him to do a normal number of press briefings. And he failed that test too.
    2
  28. 9:50 - "Is this the world we want?" That is explicitly what the globalist elites want yes. They are absolutely clear they want de-population of western nations.
    2
  29. The left never disputes that white people are being replaced by their policies. They can't, the numbers are unarguable. They just do an Acosta had hysterically scream the word "racist" to try to make you not talk about it.
    2
  30. You can try to make a liberal use basic common-sense, in the same way you can try to train a poodle to juggle with axes. No matter how hard you try - it's not going to work.
    2
  31. The next president of the united states ladies and gentlemen!
    2
  32. Lol - Biden thanks you for your donation to the DNC's party coffers!
    2
  33. They don't want us seeing Paul's little tiff with his boyfriend.
    2
  34. That's why we conservatives call people like him "Rinos" - Republican In Name Only. The only people who like Kinzinger are Democrats because he says everything they want him to say.
    2
  35. "Don't dox people" Is that too complicated for you to follow libs?
    2
  36. She actually needs her VP there to hold her hand. It's pathetic.
    2
  37.  @DavidJohnson-hg1mz  "Almost like he recently suffered a brain injury or something" And you intend to vote for someone with a major brain injury who doesn't know what he's saying, to represent you?
    2
  38. "Don't dox people" It's not a complicated rule libs - stop thinking you're special and the rules don't apply to you.
    2
  39. A rare moment of lucidity.
    2
  40. CNN have no integrity - they shill for the Dems then suddenly when the defeat comes, they're full of wisdom about what they "should" have done.
    1
  41. CNN - "Why does Trump keep talking about 2020?" Audience - "Because you keep asking him about 2020" The media are such scum.
    1
  42. The Biden regime controls the border. Not Abbot. And you guys declared yourselves a "sanctuary". Maybe they should do something about it if they're worried.
    1
  43. She's the perfect illustration of how far America has fallen since the days of the founding fathers.
    1
  44. "Private companies can do whatever they like!" Remember that one libs? The line you smugly sneered for years when it was conservatives being banned for telling the truth about you?
    1
  45. It's always cute when CNN try and "fact check" people: they always make such fools of themselves.
    1
  46. The utter shamelessness of these vile, disgusting, evil media people in pretending they didn't actively supress the evidence on this: and slander and smear those who provided evidence for you.
    1
  47. There's video of the Antifa guy pointing the rifle at Perry - so all the witnesses who claim that never happened, just perjured themselves.
    1
  48. Those who count the votes decide who wins.
    1
  49.  @quietonsetinflunecersedition  "How to tell me you know no history without saying you know no history"
    1
  50. How many tears did you shed when a black supremacist terrorist massacred whites in Waukesha? None? Thought so. The left largely celebrated that attack.
    1