Comments by "DonXardas" (@DonXardas) on "Triggernometry" channel.

 @mountainair no, they are not.
117
 @largeformatlandscape if by cherry picking you mean stating the facts and not some bs, yeah you are right.
59
@thilli1859 you should look up the definition of a fascist.
15
 @matthewryan2060 and he was/is right about it.
13
@thilli1859 because hating the law/thinking that you are above the law is not a part of the definition of fascism. A lot of fascist did drive bikes, so by your logic everybody today who drives a bike is also a fascist.
11
@killerbern666 you do understand that in warfare, especially in urban warfare there can always be casualties from friendly fire. So yeah it could be that a few people died because of some stray bullets. But that would be it. And even that is just an assumption. At least 99,9999% were killed by Hamas. This is just a fact. To deny it would be the same as to deny that the Earth is a globe.
10
@xmathmanx nope.
7
@Woodsaras well that is just strange. I am not yet done with the video, so maybe he does say something wrong but until now all he said was point on. And I would argue that educating people is quite admirable. Even if those people do not learn anything. And why do you only count this discussion? And like I said I am not done yet but can you actually point out what he said that was wrong and if possible why that was wrong. Because right now it looks like just some (baseless) claims. And you would not claim anything without a reason/proof would you?
6
I mean yeah, cause unlike them Ben is not a total reDarT and he is not talking out of his behind.
6
@Woodsaras ok, to be honest I did not expect a coherent answer that was not a mix of slurs. Kudos to you for that. Okay let talk about your points, I for once am interessted in an youtube commentator's opinion. You object to censorship of opinions. I get that. I have 2 problems with your argument. 1. England with all the censorship is objectivly better than Russia or China or some Middle East hole. Cause they censor way more. And we are not even talking about other laws. So objectivly speaking you would have to agree that England or other western countries are better in comparison. 2. The problem with censorship is if you want a variety of opinions you will not only get good/interesting opinions. You will get silly and useless opinions and what is even worse you will get outright evil and harmfull opinions. Thats is why I do not agree that it is a copout and useless. We can compare our country to others and learn from that, we can see if we are doing fine or not. Why would somebody criticize the government on topics where their views are similar? You actually do compare countries. I mean you can compare ideals, but the ideals do not matter as long as the people do not "live" those ideals. And while comparing countries we do exactly that, we compare the behaviour of people. I would argue he knows enough aboit other countries. I myself lived in a few including post-soviet space and yeah what he says is mostly true. While I agree with you that England is not the best country regarding reedom of speech, it is still near the top. The only countries where I would say it is better are Israel and Switzerland. The rest of EU is on the similar level to England with Austria probably being somewhat better. Ok the next point is interesting. It depends what you mean with worldview. I think he means political/value system. And I totally agree with him (if we are talking about systems that are actually being used and not about theoretical systems). Those systems are objectivly worse than our system, just when you compare the standart of living alone. So of course it is "enemy propaganda". Dont you think that people in those other systems see western values as "enemy propaganda". That does not mean that there only bad idead in other systems. We ahould learn from them, take the good ideas and implement them in our system. Nobody is saying that you should never critisize your own system. And Konstantin have critisized his own government on multiple occassions. The problem is that the talk here was not about issues of England. It was a discussion about the different systems. And even with all their problems, the western system"s" are superior to all other systems that ae being used right now. I would argue that there is a far superior system, but sadly there probably is never gonna be a country with such a system.
4
Nope.
3
 @supersuede6493 no they dont. Ukraine broke like almost every democratic principle and that even before the war started.
2
 @Woodsaras for no reason?
2
 @beniluv3250 respectable and wise muslims? Good joke.
2
@schroecat1 well South Korea and Japan indeed are far more advanced than Europe/USA in some aspects. I would not call them superior but I would say Europe should learn from them the same way they learned from Europe.
2
 @christophermarcone5504 anybody who has even just the most basic knowledge of the conflict and 2 digit IQ can not be pro-palestian. Except if that person is an antisemite.
1
 @christophermarcone5504 yeah you claimed that bs. How about providing some facts that support your claim? Cause all the facts support the exact opposite.
1
@justanothernick3984 1. Even after the best plastic ops a man will never look perfectly like a woman. We are pretty close, but there is always something missing. 1.1 Optics are the least important things in that regard. 2. Yes natural reproduction is binary, just like sex. There are very few exceptions to that rule and they only do confirm the rule. 3. Gender is an absolute useless concept in reality. It became glorified by pseudo scolars who had nothing else to show off. 4. Yes we decide the rules of sport. And they are and always were that males compete with other males and females compete with females. 4.1 If you want males to compete with females you would need to change the rules and not the definition of man/woman. So he is not right and in no way morally righteous. He (and people like him) is actually the opposite of that. He sneaks in new definitions without regards for existing rules and competitors. What he does is pretty much say that heavyweight fighter can identify as another weight class and fight in other categories. 4.2 The funny and sad thing is, if you accept transgender and stuff like that as, there is only one morally right thing to do. Make a new category extra for them. It is easy as hell to do, but you people do not want to accept that for some moronic reasons. 5. Yeah cause lettong males compete with females is thriving. Not advances in science make us thrive but redefining the words man/woman and not accepting basic biology. Sorry to burst your bubble, but those people you call thinkers are most certanly just morons.
1
@hammervproductions well rabid dogs do bark a lot.
1
@tituscrow4951 you do know that the muslims/arabs of that region conspired with Hitler to eradicate the jews? Hitler and the Mufti of Jerusalem had plans to kill the jews as soon as german forces arrived there. Whoever thinks that peace was ever an option is just delusional.
1
@grungle-ix8om that is not how logic works. Onw does not need to disprove any claims especially bs claims like his. The burden of proof lies with the one who makes the claim. Chunky youghurt did not provide any proof for his claims.
1
@largeformatlandscape not only to Israel. Documented history and reality do confirm them as well. It is not the fault of Israel that they have the facts on their side. But I suppose it is a had to swallow pill for an antisemite like you.
1
 @killerbern666 Israel did not start any war. How about you stop lying? You already showed everybody what you are.
1
While I do not approve of such books in schools, there should be sexual education in schools at the apropriate age. Not teaching fetishes but what is okay and not okay to do. How to use condoms. The biology of the whole "procedure". Stuff like that. And you all are very naive if you think that 12 year old children with access to the internet know nothing or very little about sex. They could probably write a book like that themselfs and it would turn out better.
1
 @MrJCKC nope, they were not. That is just a lie.
1
@MrJCKC what an answer and it only took a few hours plus all your two braincells working in overdrive to produce it. I congratulate you sir, you are the model example of a pro-palestinian.
1
 @daveandre5665 he had a bunch of far better realistic options. They just werent that profitable.
1
@MrAjfish how is he making things up? Russia has more troops, more ammunition, more tanks, more jets and so on. They also have the capability to produce more. And they have nukes. How the hell was Ukraine supposed to win? This is not about who is right/wrong or good/bad. This is just plain reality. Ukraine dies not have any capability to win on their own. And nobody is gonna send their troops cause nobody wants ww3.
1
@andybrice2711 because people are judged by what they are doing and not by what they are saying. And no, he did not make a good point. If one would take everything Trump says litteraly, one would need to do that to everybody else. Amd cenk himself would be a massmurderer. Which actually would not even be that surprising, if you take a look at the name of his show.
1
Well he is obviously just an uneducated antisemite. Because his brief history lesson was pretty much all lies. It is a shame there are people who listen to that bag of goat crap.
1
 @miraladak2314 it actually kinda does.
1
 @MrBahjatt yes and you know why they hatw Israel? Because muslims hate jews. They tried to genocide the jews multiple times. They are all religious fanatics.
1
 @alext.5853 he was not asked to make a prediction. He was asked, what he thinks about the next 4 years.
1
Of coure it is dangerous. It is cancer.
1
 @duncansolway7473 cancer never does.
1
He is frigging terrorist supporter and a massive anti-semite. What did you expect from him?
1
 @NoelFallstrom freedom to worship god is your highest value? Sorry but we do not need crazy people in Europe.
1