Comments by "EC" (@EC-dz3fb) on "Wrongful Death Lawsuit Filed Against Karen Read" video.

  1. Because the Alberts aren't guilty of anything. Karen is.
    21
  2. Many of you are touting, "Innocent until proven guilty!" - but why doesn't that pertain to the Alberts and McCabes, as well?
    18
  3. ๐—š๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฑ. Let their grieving not be vilified, for once.
    15
  4. Except no. No she's not.
    12
  5. She's ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ innocent but, yes, they can. Many murder trial have civil suits accompanying them.
    7
  6. I'm sure it's ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ about the money. What a vile thought.
    6
  7. Great ... but how is this even about "B Bev"?
    4
  8. Why plead the 5th when you're not guilty?
    3
  9. Think you must've failed 7th grade Health class.
    3
  10. ย @KarenSaysSoย  That makes absolutely no sense.
    3
  11. No, they're ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜. Karen will ๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜†๐˜€ have funds via the Pink Riders.
    3
  12. "ADHD haters"? Huh?
    3
  13. ย @estrella5935ย  What hate and misinformation have I spread? (You and I have always been civil, or so I thought. What do you mean to turn on me like that for?)
    2
  14. Did what "on purpose"?
    1
  15. โ€‹ย @JacquelineBurton-ro3vqย "Now"? ๐Ÿ˜‚
    1
  16. ย @sphiliosphilio275ย  I'm not a hater. I don't have ADHD. But I disagree, so that makes me a pariah, apparently, as is ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜†๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ who ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€ to think she's guilty ... and, as if any of it will have a bearing on the verdict. I've been called every name in the book. Those who actually understand what "๐˜ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฌ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ๐˜บ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ถ๐˜ค๐˜ฉ" - which gets used around here a lot, means, know that it doesn't refer to Karen. It's defelection; overly so ... to the point of absurdity and harm. And it's pretty much all FKR. ๐Ÿ’™
    1