Comments by "EC" (@EC-dz3fb) on "Forensic Evidence in the Case Against Karen Read | Day 19 Recap" video.

  1. FREE US FROM KAREN READ!
    3
  2. Murder ๐˜ช๐˜ด "on purpose." There's no murder by mistake.
    3
  3. How did friends and peers fail him "in his time of need"?
    2
  4. ย @bobbiedeleon4845ย  Been over that 600 times. You just don't like the answer.
    2
  5. No.
    2
  6. Was that English?
    2
  7. ย @Little-missย  Phew!
    2
  8. ๐ŸŽ‰๐Ÿ’ฏ
    2
  9. ย @bobbiedeleon4845ย  So you just avoid answering the question altogether. Got it. ๐Ÿ‘
    1
  10. ย @bobbiedeleon4845ย  Oh gosh! I'm so sorry - I didn't realize you were a shell-licker; a called-a-dead-man's-heartshattered-mother-a-"cร—nt"-&-told-her-he-hopes-she-"burns-in-hell" supporter.
    1
  11. ย @bobbiedeleon4845ย  ๐—ก๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ. I mean, why suffer fools? You're determined to ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป, ๐—ป๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฒ. Reply with whatever you want; I won't be reading it.
    1
  12. With a face like yours, ๐—ž๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ป'๐˜€ the clown?!
    1
  13. Dude, ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜?
    1
  14. Sorry, but no. If those were dog bites, there'd be ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—ด ๐——๐—ก๐—” ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ด ๐——๐—ก๐—”. There was no dog DNA.
    1
  15. His clothes were ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ผ๐—ณ๐—ณ by the EMTs. Already been over this.
    1
  16. ๐Ÿคฆ
    1
  17. Are you okay? In all seriousness. Your comments make no sense.
    1
  18. How can you be so mad about something that hasn't even been proven to have happened?! ๐Ÿคฆ
    1
  19. โ€‹ย @MissLittleBonesย  There would've been dog DNA along with the pig DNA. Expert witness said JO probably had bacon, sausage, etc.
    1
  20. ย @MissLittleBonesย  Sorry, no- if the dog had pork, its saliva would harbor dog DNA as well as pig DNA. But seeing as there was no dog attack in the first place, it's all good.
    1
  21. ย @MissLittleBonesย  No, that's how ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚'๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ (wrongly) interpreted her testimony.
    1