Comments by "EC" (@EC-dz3fb) on "John O'Keefe's Children Detail Relationship with Karen Read, Day 18 Recap" video.

  1.  @LeonWWray  The technician said it's probably from something JO ate, because if it was from something the dog ate, there would've been both porcine 𝗮𝗻𝗱 canine DNA. But there was only 🐽.
    3
  2. No.
    2
  3. Exactly. Every countering facet is dismissed. It's not the memorized narrative, so it "must" be untrue.
    2
  4. No dog DNA.
    2
  5. I think blood coagulates more quickly in lower temps, but as far as freezing "solid" ... well, its freezing point is lower (in degrees) than, say, H2O, as it more dense. (That's kinda obvious; sorry. 🤪)
    2
  6. Aurora, I'm fairly sure @BoxerClover agreed with you. I've seen him on YCT chat and he's definitely of the opinion that KR's guilty. I think here he just meant that it was "normal" behavior for JO because he was so used to KR refusing to let him be and literally had to put a locked door between them. That's how 𝗜 took BoxerClover's comment, anyway. ♡
    2
  7. Thank you. ♡
    2
  8. There was 𝗻𝗼 dog DNA. There was porcine DNA, but no canine DNA.
    2
  9.  @LeonWWray  Porcine 𝗶𝘀 pig.
    2
  10. ​ @MValleysMostWanted91  Amen. ❤
    1
  11. ​ @AntiEmpire  They could. But they didn't.
    1
  12. hearsay
    1
  13. No canine DNA.
    1
  14. So?
    1
  15. She did not. By then she'd been arrested, I believe.
    1
  16. Stop it. You don’t 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄 that.
    1
  17. Well, 𝗼𝗳 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘀𝗲 you think that.
    1
  18. No.
    1
  19. Most of the kids were over 16.
    1
  20. No dog DNA found on John.
    1
  21. There was no canine DNA found on John's body.
    1
  22. No canine DNA was found on John.
    1
  23. ​ @hectornegron9155  He was in the bedroom when Jen came in.
    1
  24. Do you know what a "patsy" is?
    1