General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
EC
COURT TV
comments
Comments by "EC" (@EC-dz3fb) on "MA v Karen Read: Could A Snow Plow Have Caused John O'Keefe's Injuries?" video.
About as many scenarios as people supposedly part of "the conspiracy!" 🤭
7
💯!!!
6
Thought it was a nine-person conspiracy?
5
😔❤
5
They 𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲 investigated. Only Trooper Proctor was reprimanded. He should've been let go IMO, but that was the extent of the fed investigation.
4
There was no dog DNA.
3
She tested well above the level of intoxication. How come the hated witnesses suddenly have more credibility than a lab technician with eight years of schooling of two of intership?
3
@AJD09FB And drinking even a small amount of alcohol - or consuming it via food - exacerbates even more so in MS patients the ability to focus or string together cohesive thoughts. In other words, alcohol reacts with twice its "power" to inebriate. If KR has MS, she was risking high for herself and others on the road. My mother and cousin have MS.
3
@josephkain6213 Right. And the only person they found culpable of wrongdoing was Proctor. It was 3,000 pages because the feds replied with copious notes to each item the defense cited as needing to be investigated.
3
@debrashawcross170 That doesn't matter. It's protocol. Like someone else said, you don't yell, "Code Blue" when there's no Code Blue. It's protocol, plain and simple. It's not a slight to John.
3
@debrashawcross170 Call it whatever you want. Still doesn't make your take on it true. Protocol is what it is.
3
You've never pocket-dialed or butt-dialed? I have a crappy Samsung Phoenix, and unfortunately I do it all the time!
3
Not exactly. A body's core usually stays warmer longer than its extremities, as it's designed to hold the vital organs. And blood's freezing point is lower than water, as it's more dense.
2
Thank you!!!
2
She is, unfortunately.
2
@denisemccourt9588 Why is it "trolling" when it opposes your view, but not trolling when it agrees with your view?
2
Or was hit and then crawled towards the house for help.
2
But I thought you all said the witnesses lied constantly. So why would they be telling the truth now? Also, BACs don't lie.
2
Lab results confirmed it she was drunk.
2
@mollykillarney2419 Really good point.
2
@Piat65 Yes. So she could obviously what was happening with the arriving cars.
2
Her blood was drawn and tested. She was most definitely intoxicated.
2
@carebear6763 You're missing the point. Forensic science said she was intoxicated.
2
@carebear6763 It was 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗻! You're just making stuff up. Pathetic. 🤭
2
No one's saying Karen was killed. 🤭
2
Turtleboy cult.
2
👍 They're such convenient words to forget and ignore.
2
No canine DNA.
2
@debrashawcross170 Didn't say 𝗮 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 about Chloe's whereabouts ... you okay? Dunno why you'd laugh over no canine DNA to support the conspiracy farce, but ... I'll join ya! 🤭
2
@DesignRhythm I never said he didn't suffer hypothermia; it was a big part of why he died. All I meant was the body's core is the last zone to be affected (understandably) and for blood to be "frozen solid" in a core that's 80 degrees doesn't make sense. There's no reason to be rude.
1
@DesignRhythm Okay. But I never said his blood 𝘢𝘯𝘺𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 was frozen; in fact I said the opposite. And I was merely going by what the coroner's report said; that he succumbed to a combination of hypothermia and blunt force trauma. If I misspoke or misconstrued anything, you have my apologies.
1
There was 𝘯𝘰 canine DNA found on John.
1
It's just more convenient to ignore it.
1
@BoxerClover Thank you! ♡
1
He was extracting texts for the investigation.
1
The FBI 𝗱𝗶𝗱 investigate. They only cited Trooper Proctor. Slapped his wrist and that was that.
1
The only DNA found was pig DNA.
1
She deleted phone data 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝗻 𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗿 before giving it to police, who'd procured a warrant to seize it.
1
And what happened?
1
Are you kidding? Jackson was 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 her "previous statements" trying to find holes. She didn't add anything. You're just wishing she had.
1
@LumiRose5804 Wow. You really don't get it.
1
"Millionaire cops"? I've never known one cop to be a millionaire.
1
Well, one thing's for sure: no canine DNA was found on John.
1
I agree it's a bummer of an effect, but your point (if you have one) only becomes weaker when you type in all-caps. 🤷♂️
1
@BoxerClover Hahahaha!
1
That was one of her first stories; that she left him at the bar. Then she couldn't deny it, and admitted on national TV that she dropped him off at Fairview.
1
𝗛𝘂𝗵? "The only one"? About five others also heard her say it. 🤦
1
Why would they?
1
Only if KR's found guilty.
1
TurtleBoy said Lucky attested to definitely seeing a body. It's in his debate with Boundless Millennial.
1
But the witnesses are liars and in a conspiracy! So why would they tell some truth now? 🤭
1
They're not. Absolutely no canine DNA was found on John.
1
@NotYourBizz So what if they did? It has nothing to do with 𝗱𝗼𝗴 DNA. If they gave some of it to the dog then the test would've come back with pig 𝗮𝗻𝗱 dog DNA. But it didn't.
1
@Sakyagirl It's 𝗻𝗼𝘁 "based on assumption." It's "based" on forensic 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝘁.
1
Not true. There's proof, in fact.
1
Her blood was drawn and 𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗱. Why do these witnesses (whom many loathe) suddenly have more credibility than a lab technician?
1
Do you mean "fall" like the season? Autumn?
1
@mustangecoboosthpp3869 hahahahaha hahahahaha haha hahahahaha hahahahaha hahahahaha
1
@SuperNCCC Doesn't matter. There'd be canine DNA as well. But there was only pig DNA.
1
How do you know that?
1
Some more Amontillado? 🍷
1
@debrashawcross170 And?
1
He probably crawled up towards the house and collapsed after KR hit him.
1