Comments by "EC" (@EC-dz3fb) on "Law&Crime Network" channel.

  1. When they say "mentally ill," to what do kind of mental illness do they refer? (Just kinda curious.) Poor kid. ☹️
    57
  2. ​ @DanielGarcia-lr6vr 🙄Yup. All her fault. Damn her for forcing her ex's arms to throw their helpless child over the railing.🙄
    27
  3.  @ecgameplayer  Autism and developmental disorders are not mental illnesses. But, thanks for the names of the other ones - people so rarely reply on here! ♡
    21
  4. Bernard 𝗣𝗼𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗲?! 😸
    9
  5. ​ @CPAries0404  But how'd they get (allegedly) microscopic pieces of it into his shirt?
    8
  6. She admitted to it, unfortunately. Lost her professorship at the university where she taught as a result of it. 😔
    8
  7. You don't know the circumstances, but you're going to 𝘫𝘶𝘥𝘨𝘦 this brokenhearted parent? Did you even watch the video? Did you listen? She's in 𝘢𝘨𝘰𝘯𝘺. Leave her alone. And 𝘪𝘧 she's at fault, is this not penance enough?
    8
  8. He's forever chained to speaking on everything in this case with "100% certainty" because it's his bread and butter. He's a stalwart employee.
    7
  9. WRONG! He's not a journalist.
    7
  10. True. TB knows 𝗵𝗶𝘀 version of events better than anyone.
    7
  11. Even the 𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘦 has done away with the German Shepherd theory.
    7
  12. Her dad and brother have the same face shape and expression. People need to just get over it.
    7
  13. 👏 Thank you.
    6
  14.  @harmonkey88  And no idea what 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘀 is, either - but 𝗜 aint freakin' out over it. P.S. He's not a journalist.
    6
  15. 16, to be exact.
    6
  16. ​ @robkingman7623  Yes, she has MS, but her brother and father have the same face shape and expression. People just need to get over it.
    6
  17. For shame! I'll have you know TB practices entertainment 𝘣𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘨!
    6
  18. He's not an attorney.
    5
  19. Well, to be fair, being nervous doesn't necessarily mean someone's also dishonest. This trial's pretty intense. ♡ @notsorryyouretriggered
    5
  20. ​ @Joe-by4ty  Joe, Joe, Joe ... we get it. You hate women. But ya gotta chill, man. All those capital letters are makin' you look even more unhinged.
    5
  21. ​ @knowjusticeknowpeace15  THANK YOU! 👏 Wish people would GET that.
    5
  22. Same. 🙏 ♡
    5
  23. ​ @harmonkey88  As was mine.
    4
  24. ​ @junkman8742  But it's 𝗻𝗼𝘁 misspelled; American English and British English spellings are both correct.
    4
  25. ​ @kell2229  Yup! And isn't TB charged with 16 felonies, including intimidation of witnesses?
    4
  26. He was quite inebriated, as well.
    4
  27. 😹🤞
    4
  28. Back off man; Turtleboy's got dibs.
    4
  29. ​ @faerieraven6877  It's not misspelled - s𝗸eptic in North America; s𝗰eptic in UK.
    4
  30. ​ @jacofalltrades7610  That's not even what @margaretlumley1648 was talking about - was it? (If wrong, I apologize.)
    4
  31. Her brother and father have the same face shape and expression. It's just her genetics.
    4
  32. ​ @notsorryyouretriggered It actually 𝘪𝘴 evidence, and 𝘪𝘴 allowed. It's not considered hearsay. Jackson would've been all over that if it were!
    4
  33. "You wuh serious about dat?"
    4
  34. ​ @RebeccaGallin  "Frogbot" 😹 I'm gonna use that! ♡
    4
  35. Judge Ito was considered pretty fair - I think?
    4
  36. ​ @berttremblay7181  What does it mean?
    4
  37.  @berttremblay7181    Dude, chill. Was just asking about the "acad." No offense intended.
    4
  38. Weren't they both exonerated?
    4
  39. She quoted Ian Fleming, the author of the 007 novels.
    4
  40. 🤖
    4
  41. ​​ @Mooches33  There wouldn't be (apparent) marks on his forehead from microscopic particles.
    4
  42. Is it that she's so uninformed, or maybe that she just has a different take? I thought she was ok, but I don't know nearly as much about this as many seem to.
    4
  43. They see them; albeit briefly. There's no way they could miss them.
    4
  44. 𝘈𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳 watching the trial, this is what you concluded? Even with 𝘯𝘰 canine DNA found?
    4
  45. Nope.
    3
  46. ​ @Joe-by4ty  I think you shoulda added just a few more "!!!!"s and your comment woulda really worked. ♡
    3
  47. ​ @pamelamac2879  Maybe she just liked him. Maybe she doesn't think in "leagues."
    3
  48. Probably not. Most likely a patsy.
    3
  49. They were friends for 3+ decades. How far back do you think this planning went?
    3
  50. That's John's father.
    3
  51. ​ @deerslayer287  If it was "case closed" it would've been dismissed.
    3
  52. "Just coming up with" 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 "now"?
    3
  53.  @marshayemanuel1991  They didn't "come up" with it, though ... they've had the fragments since Day 1, and just days ago got the DNA report from the lab.
    3
  54. You said you'd never say, "'𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦' 𝘨𝘪𝘳𝘭. Jenn didn't either. She said, "There's a man ... "
    3
  55. ​ @catme13  He's not a journalist.
    3
  56.  @therealhydropx  Oh, my God - 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐤 𝐲𝐨𝐮!!! You really get it! ♡
    3
  57. OhMyGod!!! CallTheNewspapers!!! HowDareThey!!!
    3
  58. 🦨🦨🦨🦨🦨🦨🦨🦨
    3
  59. ​ @brucebouck6152  But it's not on her to "clear" that up. It's up to the prosecution to find her guilty.
    3
  60. This is many hours later, when she was leaving to go look for him. It's not video of the incident. (That video doesn't exist - as far as we know.)
    3
  61. There was "a major conflict" between John and another officer? Who has alleged that?
    3
  62. It was Canton, MA not Boston, MA. And yes - there IS a difference.
    3
  63. I truly don't believe she meant to. 😔
    3
  64. They're American citizens. This family has been "here" for 19 generations.
    3
  65. ​ @berttremblay7181  I don't know. I was asking YOU. Sorry.
    3
  66. ​ @jewels07  I'm afraid I wouldn't know. Why do people do it, period? 😔
    3
  67.  @jewels07  I'm sorry; I thought we were talking about someone choosing to getting into a drunk driver's car. My bad! ♡
    3
  68. 𝖶𝗁𝖺𝗍?
    3
  69. ​ @jacofalltrades7610  Meh. Public salary, I guess.
    3
  70. ​ @AlphaFoxAdam  Not even "kinda."
    3
  71. 🤦
    3
  72. ​ @MrsK976  Glad you learned how to copy & paste, but you 𝗱𝗶𝗱 say you were gonna unsubscribe.
    2
  73. The FBI probe ended a long time ago. They're 𝗴𝗼𝗻𝗲.
    2
  74.  @marshayemanuel1991  Where did I say she was innocent? In fact, I think she (accidentally) did it. And I agree with you: can't stand "the hoopla" this has created.
    2
  75.  @faerieraven6877  True! Yet, I was referring to the 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 of the root word/noun: s(KC)eptic - not its adjective.
    2
  76.  @robnutile4338  No, no! I tagged someone with the username "notsorryyouretriggered" in order to see my comment - in 𝘯𝘰 𝘸𝘢𝘺 did I mean 𝘠𝘖𝘜 were triggered! 𝘐'𝘮 𝘴𝘰 𝘴𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘺! ♡
    2
  77. ​ @jolookin  Well said. ♡
    2
  78. Umm ... even the defense isn't doing the "dog bites" thing anymore.
    2
  79. ​ @mc4614  16 felonies still pending.
    2
  80.  @mc4614  False hope. 😹😹😹
    2
  81. ​ @jacofalltrades7610  Your illustrious leader only campaigns for KR's exoneration because he thinks she's hot. (And she is - no argument there!😅) How is that any better?
    2
  82.  @jacofalltrades7610  you "watched for many minutes and he never brought up her sexiness" - You 𝗱𝗼 realize YouTube has more than this one video, yes? And there's thing called the "internet" that ... never mind. ♡
    2
  83. ​ @jacofalltrades7610  It's not "my case." Nor yours, strawman. 😂
    2
  84. Who's doing that? Where? 2/3 of Karen's supporters are female!
    2
  85. ​ @DR.DisInfect  You say this constantly, dude - everywhere. Just admit you love him. It's ok! ♡
    2
  86. 😂 That was in reference to DV and SA. Can't pin this one on those 𝘩𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘥 Democrats, no matter how hard you clutch them pearls.
    2
  87. ​ @ProfessorMike69 Seriously. It's f×cking 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝗮𝗻𝗲. ("If it wasn't for TB, nobody would've uncovered blah blah blah ... " coming in 3 - 2 - 1 ...)
    2
  88. 😂
    2
  89.  @suzinaccache  Okay, but who would/could imbed 𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘳𝘰𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘤 taillight filaments into cloth?
    2
  90. ​ @hollow225  Ah, ok. Thank you.
    2
  91.  @KimElfast  Wasn't saying it was "on" either side; didn't even know it needed to be.
    2
  92. ​ @KimElfast  100% agree; 𝘦𝘹𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘺 irresponsible.
    2
  93. "bias𝗲𝗱" The word is "biased" - and I agree!
    2
  94.  @HalfHammerr  What I "shared prior" was wrong and incomplete? Okay. My bad, then. I admit I probably don't know as much as others seem to, but it's not as though I'm a complete newbie to this case and 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘯'𝘵 watched its hearings. Thanks for your thoughts.
    2
  95. Why is the mother a dirtbag for asking that? She didn't know if it was a boy or girl, yet.
    2
  96. Yup. No love lost there.
    2
  97.  @Bone_youtube_soft  Tattoos?! 𝗢𝗠𝗚!!! Not 𝘁𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗼𝗼𝘀!!! Now your 𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗼𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘁 judgement makes 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘁𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗲! My deepest apologies. 🙄
    2
  98. 🙄Have you watched the videos? The boyfriend willfully said he was the father.
    2
  99. You realize no one knows what you're referring to, right? This isn't the Live Chat - it's the comment section; it's not synced to the video.
    1
  100.  @bobc596  Right. Because he told them he was a journalist. Why wouldn't he? I thought we all had learned how often MA courts make mistakes.
    1
  101. 𝗗'𝗼𝗵! 😂
    1
  102. What are you even talking about?
    1
  103. ​ @Kaykay04822  Chill. People are allowed to ask questions. JFC.
    1
  104. No one's mentioned that?! 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗲 has mentioned that!
    1
  105. No! The USA thinks all other countries should be like them?! You're delusional. (And it's "Read.")
    1
  106.  @jacofalltrades7610  🤦‍♂️I do, because clearly you can't recognize irony from the hole in your logic. 𝘞𝘰𝘰𝘰𝘰𝘰𝘰𝘴𝘩! 🤭
    1
  107.  @jacofalltrades7610  🤭Okay, Sigmund. You're so brilliant! Ya know me so well! Your parents love you! 🤭
    1
  108.  @jessicajamesspeaks  I never said she 𝗱𝗶𝗱𝗻'𝘁 do those heinous things. I simply wondered to what sphere of "mental illness" this channel referred.
    1
  109. No, they were 𝗻𝗼𝘁 "determined to be canine." Don't spread misinformation, please.
    1
  110.  @Aaron-yw7ji  Not sure.
    1
  111. "biasED"
    1
  112. ​​ @Uzdefized  Exactly. So then why are YOU deleting your comments & posting lies?
    1
  113.  @Uzdefized  👌
    1
  114.  @Uzdefized  Surprised you didn't delete that one, too.
    1
  115.  @Uzdefized  Silly doggy! That'd be 𝘆𝗼𝘂, defending Karen Read. (But only 'cuz Lé🐢Troll gave ya permission.)
    1
  116. Huh? What does that even mean?
    1
  117. ​ @chasehedges6775  Not 𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗹𝗹. One does not 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗼 include the other.
    1
  118.  @Rambo-John-J  😄 10-4, Rambo.
    1
  119.  @DalePepin-ph7vb  "Resting B*tch Face"
    1