Comments by "Jacob Watson" (@jacobwatson3781) on "At What Age Is Sex Ed In Schools Appropriate?" video.

It's also weird that communities who do not have sex ed have astronomically higher teen pregnancy, STDs compared to communities who do teach sex ed. Facts do not care about your feelings.
2
@beamupthetaco Most conservatives are logical and kind, they don't fall into these weird conspiracies.
2
@TalmudElite No, I'm against conspiracies and narratives.
2
@joshuasabia1083 hmmm, but the bible is okay? This is just a silly story trying to get the base all worked up.
1
@joshuasabia1083 What are you talking about, the Left?
1
@jeffk464 chop of penis, where that being taught?
1
Well, can't protect myself without 2nd A right?
1
Pat learning from Matt Walsh, never a good thing.
1
@tubbytuber Pat used to be good when he would study for interviews. His bodybuilding interviews were great. But now he has learned he doesn't have to study or know what he is talking about, just say whatever Daily Wire is lying about or Fox. He still hasn't covered Fox lying.
1
Don't worry, this isn't an issue, just like CRT, the right makes shit up. I did see Montana wanted to ban teaching of gravity and evolution, so you got that going.
1
@TalmudElite I have kids in 6th and 5th grade, no issues around here or anywhere else my family is at. This is just silly.
1
@T T No, you just said it's not happening everywhere but then smuggled in its a national issue. It's a manufactured issue. Next, you will believe kitty litter was in classrooms.
1
@Teal_Seal So it's happening in all 50 states?
1
@Teal_Seal Interesting, so it's happening in 49 states? But states can't even provide any district that is teaching what you're so up in arms about. Tiktok is clouding your judgment.
1
@tubbytuber you seem to need attention. Let it all out.
1
@Teal_Seal name a school district in any state that has children being abused by curriculum.
1
@tubbytuber Got it. You can't name a single district.
1
@Ryan R. So you agree it's not within a curriculum. Now you want to smuggle in its being introduced in a way that you can't define or can't prove.
1
@beamupthetaco This sounds like some Matt Walsh garbage.
1
@Ryan R. Nice, so now you're saying it's not happening in school but possibly after school. So it's happening everywhere but again can't prove it or define it.
1
@tubbytuber What are you talking about? That is a nonsensical sentence after sentence. Again, you can show no districts, curriculum abusing children.
1
@tubbytuber So, moving on from not being able to substantiate your claims.
1
@Ryan R. I'm confused. Just to clarify, you're saying no children are being abused by curriculum?
1
@Teal_Seal Why this your 1 book dream?
1
@Ryan R. Okay, just to confirm, there is no evidence to substantiate any claim that any curriculum in any district is abusing kids? But I'm the one trolling. I like how now you're saying it's not happening but have to stop it before it happens. Thanks for agreeing that this is a manufactured agenda.
1
@Teal_Seal should be hundreds of districts, but you didn't even find one.
1
@Teal_Seal You got worked like a part time job in this.
1
@Teal_Seal No, you didn't. You seem to not know the difference between conjecture and evidence.
1
@tubbytuber Nice try, "a school district spokesman said that the district purchased the book in a batch purchase of a library association “award winners” package, a common practice in libraries, and said that it was not deliberately requested by a librarian." One book checked out one time. You just proved this is a manufactured issue. Try harder.
1
@tubbytuber No, you claim that school districts are purposely trying to abuse kids is just bunk. Keep searching.
1
@tubbytuber You keep trying to smuggle in curriculum abusing kids. Again, what curriculum is abusing kids?
1
@tubbytuber how does this one book that was bought/placed in the library in error and checked out by only 1 person prove your point? Curriculum, name a school district that was purposely abusing kids based on Curriculum?
1
@tubbytuber The thousands you say, how is that possible when the book you found was checked out by only 1 person?
1
@tubbytuber No, you're just so bad at this. One book bought in error that was checked out by 1 person doesn't mean thousands of kids were being abused. Also, 1 book in 1 library isn't a curriculum. YouTube gaslighting, you need to learn how to do this. You're too dramatic and not very savvy.
1
@tubbytuber Again, you're trying to smuggle in a school district purposely buying 1 book and making it seem like they want to abuse kids. The school district advised that the book was bought in a batch, and only 1 person checked it out. You keep trying to manufacture an issue. That is why you're so bad at this. Thousands of kids were harmed by 1 book that was checked out by 1 person. You failed to substantiate your claim. Do better.
1
@tubbytuber More vague and unsubstantiated claims. Thousands and thousands of kids are abused by something that can't be verified. Manufactured issue continues. Definition of insanity, you know what that is?
1
@tubbytuber You go, girl.
1
@tubbytuber That's right girl.
1
@tubbytuber I didn't delete anything. Keep fighting the loss, girl.
1
@tubbytuber I thought you were a strong masculine man. Guess not. Still no evidence to support you claims, sad.
1
@tubbytuber You sound like you're confused and need attention. Let it all out, taking this many L's is playing on your mind.
1
Good thing you have only conjecture and your own mind to say that.
1
@EndlngAnthem Smut filled, define thar?
1
@EndlngAnthem so, picture of vagina, what is the appropriate age for that? Anatomy gets taught in your world right? How about art, statue of david, is that okay?
1