Comments by "Jacob Watson" (@jacobwatson3781) on "WATCH: Scott Perry Snaps At Reporter Asking About Impeachment: 'If You Are That Blind...'" video.

  1. Just remember, he has no evidence to support his claim. He has to probable cause to support his claim. He wants to get evidence to support his claim, and he has no evidence to even show the evidence wants will support his claim.
    15
  2. @cwg9238  No, that is the issue. What link is there to the President. No witness has stated that, and no records have been reviewed so far showing that.
    9
  3. @RJL612  I'm confused. The house has said they need to get documents in order to show there is evidence to support illegal actions by the President. If they need documents, that means they do not have evidence, correct?
    5
  4. @colebyrnes7889  You mean Hunters crimes, right?
    3
  5. @j.b.delaney3444  You can't provide facts. They will get mad.
    2
  6.  @teekay_1  Was this the same witness who said he can provide no evidence that Joe Biden did anything illegal?
    1
  7.  @jimmyanderson2988  They, is that the voters?
    1
  8.  @melgillham462  Facts don't care about your feelings
    1
  9.  @masterlucky379  I brought up Trump?
    1
  10. @SaintKimbo  See now you're seeing the problem. I will stipulate that Hunter and some real shady stuff going on. Hunters bank statements and tax returns were reviewed, and there is no evidence showing that any funds were ever sent to his father. Also, the testimony provided by his business partner says that his father wasn't involved. Again, there is no evidence showing his father was involved. The house wants to look at documents with no probable cause. They are saying we need the documents to just make sure. How am incorrect?
    1
  11. @melgillham462  There is no evidence the president has done anything illegal regarding his sons business dealings
    1
  12. I get he has the bank statements. Now, explain how you have evidence to support your claim. That's the issue, he hasn't been able to do that yet.
    1