General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Mark Zuckergecko
Metatron
comments

Comments by "Mark Zuckergecko" (@markzuckergecko621) on "Metatron" channel.

They think men can have babies, don't try to make sense of any of their nonsense.
163
You say it like it's a bad thing, but "ultra pedantic" is part of why we're all here! Pedantry is a tough job, but someone has to do it!
142
@CMA418 a little less than 90% of the world is religious in some capacity, if you think they're all crazy, and you have it all figured out, then you're definitely the crazy one. And I'm saying this as an atheist, I'm just not a delusional antitheist who thinks I have all the answers.
99
This isn't the flex that the rainbow mafia thinks it is, most of the time people were "gay" in antiquity it was really just about power, let's just say it wasn't always 2 consenting adults.
97
@Libertinus79 I heard racists drink water too, do you drink water? Do you?????
88
Better be careful Meta, you don't want her to take away your medieval toys.
46
@tom4aot but he's not suggesting that the natives couldn't have built ancient megaliths, he's just pointing out that the evidence isn't that solid, and they could have been built much earlier. That wouldn't denigrate ancient societies in any way, quite the contrary. It would mean they could have been more advanced than we give them credit for. Trying to turn this into a racial issue is incredibly ignorant at best, and maliciously dishonest at worst. Which one are you? Ignorant, or dishonest? At least one of those things is necessarily true.
43
@Stephanie-we5ep I always find that amusing too, the "I trust the science" types are the most closed minded to anything that pushes back against the status quo. Anyone who actually values science should understand that science isn't static, it's rarely "settled", new things are being discovered every day.
43
@spiffygonzales5160 if you asked most Americans, they would probably say that he fought for black rights. Which is not true, and never what his message was. He fought for equal rights.
41
I love it when they lecture you about not stereotyping people, while repeating all of the exact same talking points and checking absolutely every stereotype box.
37
Because many of them have staked their entire career to the established series of events. They can't just admit one thing was wrong, that would mean other things are also wrong, which would call their entire career into question.
35
Reminds me of when they cried racism because stores were keeping the "black hair products" locked up. Because they were among the most frequently stolen items🤣🤣🤣 sometimes real life is funnier than the best fictional comedies.
31
@tom4aot and he's also theorized that ancient European structures like Stonehenge are older than academia suggests, is that racist? Or is it ok, because they were white people?
30
@FINNIUSORION yea the character assassination Graham has been subjected to is reprehensible. Maybe you disagree with his theories, maybe you think he's a quack, but that doesn't mean he's a racist or a bad person, I've seen no evidence that he's bigoted in any way, and from what I've judged about his character he seems like a pretty good dude that's just trying to learn more about the ancient world.
28
@OutsiderLabs and they're also met with a great deal of pushback, and it often takes a long time before their theories are actually given the appropriate amount of investigation. Many of them are dead before their discoveries are proven correct.
28
You don't have to believe Hancock's theories, they are pretty out there, but anyone should be able to admit that many of the smears against him have been off the rails, viscious, and purely motivated out of career survival, not principle. A lot of theories seemed more outrageous when they were first proposed, and ended up being true.
25
American universities are overrun with activists, it's nearly impossible to get anywhere in academia if you don't play ball, and "play ball" means carry water for far left ideology. It's really sickening. Politics should not be forefront in universities, except in courses that deal with politics, and even then, they should be teaching what happened, and what other people believe. Not telling the students what to believe.
25
"A peculiar creature, and wondrous indeed. We keep learning more about them, but there's still so much more we don't know".
24
@iivin4233 I think you're confusing race with ethnicity, the lines are often blurred. Biological race absolutely does exist, a forensic scientist would be able to determine if deceased remains are African, European, or Asian in origin, based on the bone structure. Determining whether they're from China or Thailand may be more difficult, but determining that they're from Asian descent would be easy.
24
No way man, imagine that kind of power in the hands of someone like Alex Pereira. He already has that chama power🤣
23
@tom4aot pure projection, you're the one arguing in bad faith here, by assuming his motivations that you can't possibly know without reading his mind. I've never heard him even suggest any kind of racial element to his theories, and you haven't either, you're completely fabricating that to fit your narrative.
22
Say what you will about Italians, but where there's a will, there's a way to get pasta sauce.
22
@TheElitedeath you can change the words all you want, but that doesn't change basic biology.
21
@SavageHenry777 grifter is when thing I don't like.
20
@tom4aot it's a good thing that's not what he's suggesting at all, he's only stating the fact that we don't have any real proof of who built these ancient structures, and how. Right now the running theory is a whole shitload of manpower, and that may be true, but it hasn't been proven.
19
They want to make the conversation or argument about you defending yourself against accusations, so they can avoid actually defending their indefensible positions.
15
It's the soy.
14
@Johnreal332 people like to think they have the whole world figured out. It's really as simple as that.
14
 @firingallcylinders2949 nobody even saw it, they just knew. Some grandma was miles away in Sicily when someone broke some spaghetti, she instantly stopped what she was doing and declared war.
14
@eddiel7635 you're right, and that would all be completely fine if they were more transparent and told you that conjecture was conjecture. The evidence is so scarce, we have no choice but to speculate about a lot of things, and that's fine, as long as you don't present it as fact.
12
@Bramble451 it doesn't have to be some carefully orchestrated conspiracy, their career and reputation relies on maintaining the status quo of the accepted timeline of civilization. There's not really a whole lot of dots to connect to figure out why they would want to detract anyone that threatens that.
12
I have to imagine the first quick, scoring strike was probably the end of most ancient fencing. Crazy bastards.
12
@n.a.4292 I dunno, I think there is a way you can do a sort of "cliff notes" with history, as long as you're honest about it and straight forward, make sure it's known that you aren't giving the full details, just the skeletal main points. But I get your point too, I just think it's a little too broad.
11
@tom4aot you referenced his work, and then editorialized by adding your own speculation about his personal views, which is completely irrelevant to any of his scientific claims. And ironically, you're complaining about him making speculations.
10
@HansWurst-po3bd yea buddy, everything is exactly as the establishment tells you it is, nobody has ever been wrong about history before, and nobody has ever lied.
10
@alexanderthegreat4103 I'm getting irritated because you're being dishonest. That would irritate any rational person, no matter who the person in question is.
9
@jjbees7911 there is evidence. You may not think it's enough good evidence to make a conclusion, that's your opinion, but to say there's no evidence is just plain dishonest.
9
@justineczarnobyl9987 it always blows my mind when people act like we have all the answers now, when thats never been true at any point in human history.
9
@hollywoodpineapple8337 it's not a matter of perspective, it's a matter of accuracy. Equal rights is a consistent message, it means equal for everyone, it doesn't matter who's perceived as above or below. That's the whole point. Nobody is supposed to be seen as above or below, according to inherent characteristics.
9
Some of it is just career driven, if your entire career is staked on the established timeline of history, you're going to be hostile towards anything that contradicts that, you have a financial motive. But it's also political.
8
Do you just spam the same bullshit on every one of his videos? Your mom called, she said your hot pockets have cooled down enough, and you can safely eat them now.
8
@tom4aot yes, I don't like liars. I'm not going to apologize for that, or be shamed for it either, if you've happened to notice a lot of people having a similar attitude towards you, it's probably because you lie too much.
8
@FirstLast-wk3kc observation of reality? Are you refusing to acknowledge that people don't want their work to be discredited?
8
@Tlevids you couldn't possibly be more wrong, there was absolutely a great deal of pushback in academia for many years after GT was discovered, and yes, new discoveries are embraced, but usually only after a period of pushback and even hostility. And waiting for enough evidence is one thing, but people of your mindset often ignore all inconvenient evidence, because you don't want to feel like you were wrong.
8
@sjm9876 honestly I've always thought spaghetti was overrated. It's pasta, it all tastes the same, it's just in different shapes. Why would you use noodle that requires 2 utensils to eat properly, that doesn't hold any sauce, when you can just use penne or macaroni and use a spoon or a fork? Maybe this is my American talking, but I just prefer noodle shapes that aren't a pain in the ass.
8
Right, when he has nobody to push back and fact check him in real time.
8
@drewbydoobydoo2918 that's not a very honest hypothetical though, because we haven't excavated anywhere close to 99% of all ancient ruins, and we probably never will. Ancient history is like a 1,000 piece puzzle that we only have about 100 pieces to. We have to fill in a lot of the gaps with assumptions, and that's fine, because it's the best thing we have, but anyone that's being honest will acknowledge that a lot of established world history is based on assumptions. So we shouldn't dismiss theories off hand because they sound crazy, or because they contradict conventional knowledge, because a lot of those theories have ended up to be accepted as true in the past.
8
Uh oh, watch out with that. You're probably going to get attacked by the "everything academia says is correct" army.
8
@soulknife20 in a lot of cases, it is exact. Obviously it would be more difficult if someone was Asian and African mixed, but they would still be able to determine that they're Asian and African mixed.
8
@soulknife20 there's that conflation of race and ethnicity again. And you're telling other people they don't know what they're talking about. A German and a Spaniard are ethnically different, but racially the same.
8
 @c1ph3rpunk I had to switch to my other account because all of my comments are getting deleted, I guess I did a naughty and caught the ire of the overlords.
7
@tom4aot something tells me Metatron isn't going to cry about losing subscribers like you.
7
@AFlyingCoconut I never made the claim that everything he's proposed is correct, and you know that I didn't, you're being deliberately dishonest. That seems to be a common thread, Hancock's supporters are generally honest and grounded, his detractors seem to always be dishonest, with very little exception. The ironic part is you're actually helping grant validity to his theories by being so dishonest about him.
7
@christiangrosjean2980 it would be pretty easy to prove there's no gremlins in my closet, because I can just look in my closet and see that there are no gremlins. Ancient history is a different story, because what we know is really just a small piece of the puzzle, with a lot of gaps in between. A lot of Hancock's theories would fill in some of those gaps. It isn't proven, but it makes logical sense, and is deserving of more research.
7
 @jellyfishi_ look up Yuri Bezmenov. Then you'll understand why Soviet teachings are so relevant in the US.
7
@Steelmage99 so answer the questions. Pretty easy to expose their grift, if it really is a grift.
7
Based on reading the comments, it seems like most people are divided on this debate into 2 camps: academia could never be wrong, and they would never mislead anyone, and maybe they could and would.
7
@gryaznygreeb it's a hell of a lot easier to just scoop up some penne or macaroni. Just sayin.
6
@Tylwaa yea I can't stand this arrogant attitude like we have all the answers now, when that's never been true at any point in history. People dismiss Hancock's theories just because it "sounds crazy", but a lot of the things that are accepted as scientific fact today sounded crazy when they were first proposed.
5
@Stefano-o5f but you can get a better job and make smarter financial decisions. I'm not saying it's easy, I'm far from financially comfortable myself, but there are a lot more options for most of us than there were for most people of the past. Many of them were prevented by law to do anything other than what they were born into.
5
And there is nothing wrong with that.
5
"You see'a this thumb'a? That's a tomato!"
5
@justineczarnobyl9987 a lot of people just don't like to admit that they don't know, it makes them feel uncomfortable, probably even scared and helpless. And it's pretty clear that there's a consistent trend just reading through the comments, the people who are supportive or even neutral with Hancock are saying "I don't know, it's worth considering", and his detractors are lying and misrepresenting him, and everyone defending him.
5
@NathanCassidy721 and you can understand where his professional detractors are coming from, they're defensive because their career and livelihood could be in jeopardy if Hancock is right. That doesn't make it right, but it's a logical motivation. As far as just random people on the internet going out of their way to smear and discredit Hancock, that's more of a head scratcher. I guess they just want to feel like they're smarter than everyone else.
5
@Tlevids and Gobekli Tepe was met with quite a bit of hostility when it was first discovered, from the status quo. You're accidentally arguing against your own point.
5
@Tlevids I love how you're accidentally supporting my argument more than your own, this is hilarious.
5
Maybe you can give an example of far right revisionism? Keeping in mind, visionism doesn't count as revisionism, just because it conflicts with your preferred revisionism.
5
I think every wife has a little Genghis, maybe not genetically necessarily, but always metaphorically.
5
@anthonyoer4778 they're so dopey, it's like advocating for triangular wheels, because the traditional circular wheels are oppressive. What's that you say, triangles don't roll? Well that wasn't a real triangle!!!🤣
5
This kind of stuff is really interesting, there are true believers in this crap, that's what keeps it rolling. Most of them are just in on the take together, like pro wrestling, but there are people who "believe" so hard that they actually get knocked out, or at least think they did. I dunno. Something like that. That's why it's so interesting, I have no idea how it works.
4
@IrishHermes for claiming to "trust the science", you people sure don't come up with any logically consistent arguments.
4
It's like love, for those of you who don't believe in religion. You can't prove that you love your family, it's not tangible or quantifiable. But I'm sure you do love your family, and I would take you at your word if you say so. You don't have to prove it.
4
@viperking6573 like I said in an earlier comment, it's like love. You can't prove that you love someone with facts and logic, it's just something you feel. And you have to have faith. Enough faith that people get married and start families together. Nobody is always rational, all the time. You aren't supposed to be, you're supposed to be human.
4
@SiaWinsi you wouldn't want to challenge the status quo if you're part of the status quo. And that's the people that are Hancock's main detractors.
4
@Intranetusa he could be wrong, but I'm yet to see any real legitimate debunking of all of his claims.
4
@Tlevids and it was discovered in the 1960s, so why do you think it took over 30 years for a legitimately funded expedition?
4
And you can't blame them for being threatened, but it's not my problem if they were wrong. The truth is more valuable than their tenure and reputation.
4
@nocsiou there really is, and it's not just politics. Even sports, and movies, and dumb crap like that, most people don't have any interest in a back and forth discussion, they would rather all state the most hyperbolic "hot take" and then argue with everyone else in the comments about how their opinion is objectively correct, and everyone else is stupid.
4
You can always try. Sometimes foolish pedantry is the best kind of pedantry. Or at least the most amusing.
4
I always picture Alan Rickman, from Dogma.
4
@tewks4458 ice age doesn't mean the entire planet was covered with ice all year long. There were still regions that were very livable, long term, just not as many of them or as vast.
4
@Tlevids oh look, another appeal to authority. I've only seen about 50 in these comments. It's like you're all reading from a script.
3
@KimKhan this is just an appeal to authority, the person making a discovery doesn't change the validity of the discovery.
3
Imagine just casually walking into Starbucks like that an ordering a coffee.
3
Damn bro, were you breaking spaghetti noodles when you typed that?
3
@GothPaoki no proof, but there's plenty of evidence.
3
I'm sure they had some kind of assembly line type system going on though, where they always had wood being prepped and dried.
3
@jjbees7911 that's just how science works, every new discovery is built on old discoveries, even if it replaces the old discovery. This isn't unethical in any way, it's the only way we can discover new things.
3
@jjbees7911 how am I uncomfortable with saying I don't know? I've never claimed to believe these theories absolutely, there you go putting words in my mouth again. Why do you have to be so dishonest to try and prove your point?
3
@jjbees7911 you're correct, I don't let things go when someone is being dishonest. You can be wrong, you can have an opinion I don't agree with, I'll let that go, but when you lie, and you know you're lying, and you know I know you're lying, I'm not going to let that go until you admit that you're lying.
3
@jjbees7911 you're deliberately misrepresenting Hancock's theories, he's never concluded that the pyramids must have been built by aliens, that's just one theory that's been put out there. And you know that, you're just lying to make it sound more silly than it really is.
3
@valerielhw but a significant part of it wasn't.
3
@Tlevids the fact that it was 30 years between the discovery and excavation is very strong evidence, you can't try to tell me people didn't think it was significant when it was first discovered. They may not have known exactly how significant, but they definitely knew it was significant, immediately.
3
A lot of people are quick to dismiss Graham's theories, but there are definitely a lot of gaps and unanswered questions in the established timeline of human existence.
3
@Aikidjam and it's not like the academically accepted theories about how megalithic structures were built are proven either, their story is basically "a whole lot of people built it. The end." Ok, maybe so, but that doesn't explain how, and why, and why we don't know how they did it.
3
@IsomerSoma you know the best counter to a dishonest question? An honest answer. If you can't provide that, it either was not a dishonest question, or you don't have an honest answer.
3
@gingerbaker_toad696 YT deletes comments, content creators can also add filters to delete even more, but I've never seen any reason to believe Metatron does.
3
 @autisticberserker1807 maybe people should stop breaking the law. And I'm saying this as a convicted felon.
3
@anthonyoer4778 what's a real triangle you say? Well it's this convoluted nonsense I theorized, and if we try that and it doesn't work, then I'll just say that wasn't a real triangle either, and then berate you for not knowing my jackass definition of triangle!
3
@cjohnson3836 if 90% of the world is wrong, they're probably not wrong.
3
@tewks4458 well you have to keep in mind that we don't discover every ancient society, for every ruin we discover, there's many others we either haven't discovered yet or maybe we never will. So if we agree that agricultural societies could have existed in the ice age, it would be even less likely to find them because there's likely fewer of them. Our knowledge of the ancient world only increases with the more we discover.
3
 @licensedtodill he's going for that quirky "professor by day, badass explorer on the weekends" look, but less badass.
2
@joedoe7041 I'm happy with my job, I don't need to "quite" and find a "batter" one.
2
I dunno man, that hat tells me he knows what he's talking about.
2
@DarthRevan2.0117 I know it can be scary to admit that you don't have the whole world figured out. But reality doesn't care if you're scared, it still exists.
2
@jjbees7911 there's a lot of evidence that ancient civilizations did have wider contact than we initially thought though, it's not just that they built similar structures, although that is definitely compelling as well. Some of the Nazca lines depict animals that aren't even indigenous to South America at all, at least not as far as our knowledge goes now. So that's a little tough to explain. I'm not claiming everything Hancock proposes is the concrete truth, and he's not either, it's a theory. But at least I'm being honest about it, you're just dismissing it off hand without even listening to what he's saying.
2
@jjbees7911 so how did ancient Inca know about species that don't even live on their continent? You haven't offered an alternative explanation.
2
@jjbees7911 nobody is saying they weren't intelligent enough to conceptualize or build pyramids, people just correctly point out that the logistics of building them with the technology that we know they had is damn near impossible, so the most likely scenario is that we were either wrong about how advanced their technology is, or we were wrong about who built them, and when. That's a very logical assumption. It has nothing to do with intelligence, that's just you being dishonest again. People in the 1700s weren't stupid because they didn't know how to drive a car, because cars didn't exist. You're probably projecting your insecurity about your own low intelligence, that's why you're asserting that it was an intelligence issue when Hancock has never suggested that.
2
@jjbees7911 would you accept paintings on a wall as sufficient evidence if it didn't support the established narrative? Real question.
2
 @blackberrythorns good point, let's stop paying for all that crap too🤣
2
More likely just a cry for attention. But it could be the other thing too.
2
And there are probably things that are common now that will some day be looked back at as barbaric and inhumane. We have no way of knowing that now, otherwise we would stop doing it. It's funny how there are people in every era who think we have the whole world figured out.
2
@viperking6573 thank you, and I'm not even saying everyone has to believe it. I'm an atheist, I just don't see religion as silly and stupid like a lot of people seem to, I see it as a difference in opinion.
2
@thinkingallowed6485 how is love different from faith? Be specific.
2
@gengiz80 difference is we do have proof that we landed on the moon, there isn't any proof of how ancient civilizations built megalithic structures. Is everything you say a lie? Are you ever even accidentally honest?
2
Every time I see these segments, I think of the movie "Quasi", it's a reimagining of Quasimoto with the Broken Lizard idiots from Super Troopers🤣🤣🤣 when Quasi meets the Princess, he says "how did you get so clean?" I die laughing every time, because he's not trying to be slick or funny, he's genuinely curious.
2
@metatronyt name one reason spaghetti is better than penne.
2
@MagisterMilitum-IV at least Hancock is offering explanations, that isn't a God of the gaps argument. He isn't saying God. Until you can prove his theories wrong, it's at least worth consideration.
2
Damn, Meta, I say this with love, but she might have better hair than you.
2
@miotyuori7331 just like every racist, you think your racism is the good kind of racism, and just like all of them, you're wrong.
2
@miotyuori7331 advocating for special interest groups is not equal rights.
2
There's a ton of those all over the place if you're referring to the same thing I'm thinking of. They call them Moai on Easter Island, not sure if I'm spelling that correctly. But it was a secluded island with hundreds of giant stone carvings, they're still discovering more to this day, a lot of them look like European faces. And similar statues are found all over South America and Mexico too.
2
Swiss wood sucks, it has holes all over it.
2
@blackberrythorns pointing out the problems in our economy isn't exactly the flex you think it is, since none of those problems are caused by capitalism, they're primarily caused by government corruption. Capitalism means the government stays out of the market, and we are far from that.
2
@blackberrythorns yea ask anyone from any socialist country how that worked out.
2
@blackberrythorns yes, Banana Republic, another phrase familiarized by another failed socialist nation🤣
2
@SwordFighterPKN it's the same reason the manager of a Popeye's would probably tell you KFC sucks, and Popeye's is better.
2
@IsomerSoma I really don't understand this reasoning, if someone asks a dishonest question, then just give an honest answer. It's really not that complicated. It's pretty easy to expose their BS, if it really is BS. If you can't do that, then it's probably because you're the one that's full of shit.
2
@autisticberserker1807 everyone is a capitalist with their own money.
2
@Joe-Przybranowski there's also a lot more that we don't know, especially with ancient history. Trying to shame people away from being curious is much more harmful than "misinformation".
2
Probably still is.
2
@scover3 the people who actually thought about those things were the ones who figured it out. The people like you stood on the sidelines and pretended like you already had all the answers.
2
@KimKhan that's the definition of an appeal to authority. If he's really so unqualified, then you should be able to point to the flaws in his theories. His personal credentials aren't relevant.
1
@KimKhan so give an example of something he's lied about. Be specific.
1
@KimKhan none of anything you just said is an example of him lying. He might be wrong, but that doesn't mean he's lying. Turns out you're the one lying, unless you have a real example of him lying that you've just been withholding.
1
@KimKhan you kinda gotcha'd yourself, by making the claim that he's a liar and then failing to provide an example of even one lie.
1
@KimKhan you never demonstrated that he did that, you're just making it up.
1
@williamarthur4801 seriously, liberals have this starry eyed idea that we "got better", and sure, humane treatment has advanced over the years, but it wasn't out of the goodness of our hearts, it was mostly fueled by the fact that machines can do more work than humans without dying or complaining about it. And it's cheaper.
1
@VampireNoblesse their entire worldview is "white people bad", and they accuse everyone else of bigotry. It's reprehensible.
1
@blackberrythorns everyone is a capitalist with their own money.
1
My favorite thing about samurai is how the movement of their mouth never matches up with what they're saying. I've always wondered how they did that.
1
12.
1
@Stefano-o5f so you had to be hired as a journalist, but you were only allowed to journalize certain opinions🤣 sounds like you were living the dream. And yes, I realize "journalize" isn't a real word, I used it to illustrate the absurdity of your comment. You seem like the kind of pretentious douche that wouldn't get the humor.
1
@Stefano-o5f so it's easy to get a job in journalism, but you're only allowed to write what they tell you to write🤣 how liberating. And pointing out the shrinking freedoms in western nations isn't the flex you think it is, we're losing those freedoms because of communist ideals seeping into our government.
1
@joedoe7041 why is it ignorant? What's stopping you from doing better financially?
1
@joshcline8764 yea it's crazy. And like I said, people really believe it. If they didn't, it wouldn't exist, because nobody would care. The people actually on the stage are probably in on the take, but probably not all of them. The power of suggestion is real, I don't doubt that there are people who have actually been "cured" because they thought they were cured. Maybe it was never real in the first place, I'm not gonna pretend to understand it, that's why it's so interesting.
1
HA-oh shit hold on. Aaaggghhhh-DOUKEN!!!
1
@tom4aot it's probably YT that's deleting replies. Remember when the entire left side of politics was supporting censorship and suppression of ideas they don't like? Yea. I remember. You don't get to complain when you get what you demanded.
1
@domm5715 yea it's pretty insane. It shows their insecurity, they desperately want to feel like they have all the answers, so they just blindly believe whatever the mainstream says so they can call anyone who asks questions a "conspiracy theorist."
1
@jjbees7911 that's how science works, every new discovery is built on old discoveries by other people. If he's wrong, then it shouldn't be hard for his detractors to prove it, but that's not what they do, they just resort to character assassination instead.
1
@gengiz80 Stonehenge and other ancient Europeans rock circles are some of the main sites used as evidence for Hancock's theories. Why are you being so dishonest? You clearly have no idea what you're talking about, and you're just fabricating nonsense out of thin air. You're just like every other liar in these comments.
1
 @swirvinbirds1971 carbon dating isn't evidence?
1
@swirvinbirds1971 that's just simply untrue, carbon dating supports ancient sites like Gobekli Tepe as being much older than what mainstream academia accepts as the beginning of permanent or at least long term human settlement.
1
@عباسالجوراني-س6ج I think of Demolition Man, how it was illegal to have any kind of physical contact, or "fluid exchange", all pregnancies are through IVF, and "sex" is done through VR glasses. Basically spanking it while you video chat with your wife while she's also spanking it🤣 it was meant to be funny, but we saw how much people freaked out about disease a few years ago. And the characters in the movie looked back at our era like we were a bunch of disgusting savages because we kissed and had sex.
1
 @jenniferj5324 yep, and they have such a large population that they still have more Republicans than any other state.
1
@viperking6573 because they think they have faith in the right thing? Otherwise they wouldn't have faith in it?
1
@jorndebello7317 calling someone antivax because they're skeptical of one specific new vaccine, or because they're against government mandates, is as dishonest as calling someone a vegetarian because they don't eat pork.
1
@frankfly1368 I see I've offended a lot of Italians in the chat. I can see the frantic hand waving and arm flapping from across the ocean🤣
1
@frankfly1368 I'm a Texan too, it's just different shapes of the same thing.
1
Mainstream archaelogists have staked their entire career on the timeline being what the timeline is known as today. Any new find that threatens to change that is a threat to their entire career, and legacy, and they fight against it.
1
You do realize that you can't catch a cold from the cold, right?
1
@metatronyt don't you know? They like the good things, and if you disagree with them about anything at all, for any reason, that means you like the bad things! You don't like the bad things, do you? DO YOU????
1
I feel like 1/3 of this channel is just an excuse for Metatron to play with Medieval toys. And there's nothing wrong with that.
1
They're arrogant, they assume that their current morals are the ultimate morals. Too ignorant to realize there are things that are normal now, that will be seen as barbaric in the future. And we have no way of knowing that now, because if we did, we would just stop doing it.
1
@22leggedsasquatch hey, watch it with the antisemitism.
1
@spicesmuggler2452 but not you, you have the whole world figured out, and it's exactly how mainstream science tells you it is. They could never be wrong, except for the countless times throughout history they were wrong. But not now. Now we have all the answers.
1
@spicesmuggler2452 aren't you the one believing in lightning strikes from God in this scenario? You're the one saying the status quo is correct, no need to investigate further, I'm the one saying hold on, this doesn't seem like the whole story, maybe we should investigate further. Stop me when I'm wrong.
1
@impudentdomain I mean, if you scale it up, isn't everything always moving both towards land, and away from land?
1
 @KevinPlump are the white supremacists in the room with you right now? Do they talk to you? Do they hear when you talk to them?
1
@drewbydoobydoo2918 so you're just a thoroughly dishonest person. Glad we clarified that.
1
@Intranetusa well until we have a more clear and fully fleshed out idea of how they were built, you shouldn't dismiss an idea just because it sounds crazy. And it's not baseless, there is carbon dating that supports the claims of civilizations being much older than originally thought, including the Egyptians. It's not conclusive proof, but we don't have conclusive proof that the mainstream accepted dating is correct either.
1
@Intranetusa and we also know that there was liquid water on Mars in the distant past, and there is bacterial life there now. Yes, that's a far cry from advanced, intelligent life, but just the idea that there was ever life at all on Mars would have been a crazy postulation not very long ago. And it's people like you who always stand in the way and slow down the process.
1
@Intranetusa we are saying "I don't know", that's the entire point of this. You're the ones making affirmative claims you don't know. We have no proof of how ancient civilizations moved the giant stones in such precise formations, like we see all over the world. That doesn't mean they didn't do it, but until someone comes up with a working hypothesis for how they did it, we should be exploring theories, with an open mind.
1
@Intranetusa we know how the Greeks and Romans built their structures, because we have written record of it. They also weren't hauling massive rocks over rough terrain to build megalithic structures. Do you genuinely not see the difference between the Parthenon and the great pyramids, or are you just being dishonest?
1
 @blackberrythorns you just can't stop accidentally proving the opposite point you're trying to prove.
1
@blackberrythorns again..... You don't seem to understand that you're proving the flaws in your own ideology.
1
@blackberrythorns socialism sells itself as all those things to manipulate stupid people. What it actually is, is top down control of the economy by a handful of elites.
1
@blackberrythorns there's a big difference between the socialism the overlords sell to people who are so stupid they think socialism is a good idea, and the actual socialism that you get. Just ask anyone from a socialist country, if they survived it.
1
@blackberrythorns every economy is mixed, there's never been an absolute capitalist, or absolute socialist nation on any meaningful scale. When someone refers to an economy as socialist, they mean that it leans very heavily towards socialist policies. Of course you know that, you're just trying to obfuscate because all your stupid points are getting rightfully mocked.
1
@pohidie94 that's different man, Italians are very passionate about meat🤣
1
@ulfskinn1458 and it's not as simple as just discovering that one set of ruins is older than we thought, if it was just that, there probably wouldn't be as much gatekeeping. But if one set of ruins is older than we thought, that casts doubt on every other one, and it could start a ripple effect that completely turns archaeology and ancient history upside down. A lot of people's entire careers would lose a lot of credit, and they can't have that.
1
@evbbjones7 nobody has given an adequate explanation for the water erosion on the Sphinx, at least not that I'm aware of.
1
@evbbjones7 so at the very least, what we previously thought about the topography of Egypt at the time the Sphinx was built was wrong. Maybe the time period it was built could have been wrong. This is what happens when people question the established orthodoxy, even if their hypothesis ends up being wrong, we can still learn new things.
1
@evbbjones7 because according to mainstream archaeology, the Sphinx was built during a period that Egypt was very dry and arid. Except it has water erosion that's consistent with very heavy rainfall, for long periods of time. So either Egypt wasn't as dry as we thought it was, or the Sphinx is older than we thought it was.
1
@evbbjones7 but why is that only evident in part of the Sphinx, and not the entire thing? It suggests that it was remodeled, and that the age of the structure itself is much older than the part of it that was remodeled.
1
@vulkanofnocturne it's the same psychology cults use to control their flock, they teach you to just attack the character of anyone who doesn't agree with your worldview. Prevents you from actually listening to them, because if you listen to other points of view, you might end up having naughty opinions.
1
They called Larry Elder the "Black face of white supremacy" when he was running for governor in a California recall election. The realm of reason never stopped these people before.
1
They called Larry Elder the "Black face of white supremacy" when he was running for governor in a California recall election. The realm of reason never stopped these people before.
1
@anthonyoer4778 you've just been brainwashed into thinking circles are the superior wheels, by a white supremacist capitalist system. They don't want you to know how much better triangles are.
1
@seanbeadles7421 so what commonly accepted truths about history and archaeology do you think are untrue, or at least dubious?
1
@kielbasamage I was talking to a coworker yesterday about how white people are labelled as racist because they're pretty much the only people who give a shit about being labeled racist. Go anywhere else in the world and try to brow beat them about caring about their own people first, they'll laugh in your face, because there's nothing wrong with that when anyone does it besides white people.
1
@OsirisMawn they start with the conclusion, and work their way back from there. Any facts that get in the way of white people always being the bad guy are completely ignored, and any shred of anything that suggests otherwise is overblown and taken as gospel. If they can find one Black Roman, all Romans were black. If they can find one female leader in Africa, all leaders were female.
1
@cjohnson3836 most of the Christians I know seem to have their life under control a lot more than the socialists that just cry for a handout and puff out their chest about how smart they are, even though they aren't smart enough to figure out their own life without demanding a handout.
1
@cosmincodreanu7753 seriously, I don't know how they do it either. I never leave home without my wallet, phone, keys, a lighter, and a pen. I guess they have their purses, but most women I know don't always carry one with them.
1