Comments by "Mark Zuckergecko" (@markzuckergecko621) on ""DOMESTIC TERRORISM!": Piers Morgan RIPS Protests At Supreme Court Homes | The Kyle Kulinski Show" video.

  1.  Ghost Yuki  no, it's illegal to go to their house and protest, full stop.
    3
  2. Intimidating judges or jurors is terrorism, yes.
    2
  3.  @Ixnatifual  I love how you covered the "it's not being taught in schools, but it would be fine if it was" line of defense all in the same sentence. You lefties usually only fall back on the "it's fine if it was" defense once the "it's not being taught" defense fails.
    2
  4. What else would you call it? They're trying to use intimidation to get SC Justices to reverse a decision. That's textbook terrorism.
    1
  5. It's illegal if it's the home of a federal judge.
    1
  6.  @patchwurk6652  I've already seen numerous other people post the specific law to you in numerous different threads about this exact topic on other videos. You've been shown this law, we both know you've been shown, you just ignore it every time and ask someone else the same question. You're being dishonest and you and I both know you're being dishonest.
    1
  7. Violence or intimidation. You conveniently left that 2nd part out, which this is, 100%. There is absolutely zero way to interpret this other than trying to intimidate the Justices. This is terrorism.
    1
  8.  @joseluisgonzalez1047  there is absolutely zero reason for them to be at the house of SC Justices other than to intimidate them into changing a decision that was leaked before it was made official. Which is why these decisions should not be leaked. But these are only the kind of things you would care about if you're smart enough to understand what morality and ethics are.
    1
  9.  @beratnabodhi  Jan 6 was mild in comparison to any weekend in Portland or Minneapolis over the last 2 years.
    1
  10.  @beratnabodhi  how many people were killed by protesters at the Capitol? And how many people were killed by BLM during the riots in 2020?
    1
  11.  @beratnabodhi  so nobody at Jan 6. Yea good job little fella.
    1
  12.  @beratnabodhi  I didn't ask if anyone died, I asked if anyone was killed by protesters. And the answer is zero. And you and I both know the answer is zero. But you're a liar, and your parents don't like you.
    1
  13.  @beratnabodhi  you do realize that if you were deleted tomorrow, nobody would be upset, right? Not a single person. Your family would probably be happy.
    1
  14.  @sgo1oneill  I've had enough of leftists, there's no reasoning with people who want you dead.
    1
  15.  @gemkid85  it's illegal if it's a judge or juror in an active trial. As far as any random person it's just extremely unethical. But I never expected leftists to care about the law, or ethics.
    1
  16. So the BLM rioters are terrorists? Wow, I agree, but I didn't expect a leftist to accidentally admit it.
    1
  17.  @thebarnabator69  it was a little less than 99% bud, there were over 500 riots.
    1
  18.  @PotatoChowderhead  I would be against that ruling, but if there were protests at the private residences of judges I would have a problem with that too, because it's illegal. I don't understand what part of this is hard for leftists to understand, going to the house of a judge is intimidation, you can't do that. You can protest at the courthouse, you can protest at federal buildings, you can protest at the house of a private civilian, but you CANNOT protest at the house of a judge or juror. Under any circumstance.
    1
  19.  @patchwurk6652  Fairfax County, VA. Or at least it was. And feel free to cruise through Libs of TicTok any time you want, it's a treasure trove of insane leftists saying the queit part loud. But you know all of this, you're just a liar.
    1
  20.  @JanglesPrime999  this isn't debatable, it's not my opinion vs yours, it's illegal, that's a fact, there is no argument.
    1
  21.  @brothersandsistersofvalhalla  protest them at their public office all you want. You can't protest at their house.
    1