Comments by "Mark Zuckergecko" (@markzuckergecko621) on "100 Pro-Choice Protesters Show Up At Kavanaugh's House | The Kyle Kulinski Show" video.

You guys have completely lost the plot. And the fact that you still think you're the "good guys" shows you're completely deranged and unfit for society. At least embrace your role as the villains.
8
@jimbob3030 except protesting at the private residence of a SC Justice is a federal crime. This isn't debatable, this is a fact. And what happens when far right protesters go to the private residence of their states' SC, demanding that they make all abortion illegal? Do you not see the problem here? Or do you just not care, because it's your side doing it right now?
4
@jimbob3030 you don't have the right to protest anywhere you want, in any way you want. You can't protest on a freeway stopping traffic either. There are all kinds of restrictions against protest, that doesn't mean you don't have the right to protest at all. Things like shutting down a freeway are sometimes overlooked, because the bad optics of police shutting down a protest outweigh the potential harm caused. That's why it's called "civil disobedience". But it's still illegal. They usually just let it slide if it's low level. But protesting at the private residence of a SC Justice is not low level. This has already been explained to you. You don't want to live in a society where court decisions are determined by whatever extremist group has the most power in that moment. None of us do. You're just supporting this because your extremist group has power right now, and you're not smart enough to understand that this can cut in both directions.
4
@jimbob3030 Jesus Christ you people are seriously not well.
3
You are groomers. And the protest at the Capitol was hardly an insurrection.
2
@Kevo6492 so maybe stop grooming kids.
2
That's an elaborate way of saying "it's ok when we do it."
2
That's the same line of reasoning the Nazis used, it was ok to eliminate lesser people "for the greater good".
2
It's a federal crime to protest at the private residence of a SC Justice. I'm sure the left doesn't care, because you only care about the law when people you don't like break it. But just thought you should know.
1
@stargatecommand714 so what make believe gender are you, little cupcake?
1
You guys know it's a federal crime to protest at a SC Justice's house, right? Yea, I'm sure you don't care. "By any means necessary", amirite?
1
@jensboettiger5286 leftism is why society can't have nice things.
1
@TROBassGuitar So it's not about bodily autonomy then? Why would you use that argument when you really don't care?
1
No, it's illegal to protest at the home of a SC Justice. It's federal law. These people can and should be charged. You can protest at the courthouse, you can protest at public property, you can protest at a private citizen's private property, but protesting at the private property of a public servant is a federal crime, for obvious reasons.
1
@jimbob3030 do you think it should be legal for the KKK to turn up at the private residence of a judge, demanding that they make slavery legal? It's just a protest bro. You believe in the right to assemble, don't you?
1
@brothersandsistersofvalhalla I'm saying the use of force or intimidation to influence law is a dangerous road to go down. Aren't you the same people that always call everything you don't like "a threat to democracy"? Do you not see how using force and intimidation is the exact opposite of democracy?
1
@akon360 the majority of people are somewhere in the middle, where they don't want abortion outright banned, but they also want restrictions on it and see it as morally shady at best, usually morally wrong. That's where the left is able to get away with lies like "the majority are pro choice", that's only technically true, because of those people, a lot of them are against abortion on principle. That's why overturning Roe is the right decisions. Leave it up to the states to make their own laws, the way it should be.
1
@TROBassGuitar What do you think overturning Roe does? Real question. I want you to explain what this ruling is and what the implications of it being overturned are.
1
@FNLNFNLN there were over 500 BLM riots in a single year, causing more damage and violence than any other civil movement in US history. You don't have a leg to stand on here bud.
1
@FNLNFNLN more people were killed in the BLM riots than the total number of unarmed black people killed by police in the same year.
1
@botanicalitus4194 killing babies isn't a basic human right.
1
@tobysmith2081 why else would they show up at their private residence? They're trying to intimidate the Justices into changing the decision, plain and simple. They could "peacefully protest" at the courthouse. Going to their house is clearly a threat, and there have been countless threats of violence online by leftist extremists. You all know this too, you're just liars.
1
@duffydope lmao, leftists don't want to talk about that part. Or Margaret Sanger's ties to white supremacy. And by "ties" I mean that she was an outright white supremacist.
1
The government didn't remove abortions though. It just removed the unjust ruling that the federal government has oversight over states laws.
1
Woah there, are you questioning election integrity? I heard that was a THREAT TO OUR DEMOCRACY!!!!!!
1
@deymad1836 because the left is already using the rhetoric that everyone is trying to harm them, and you're already saying it's justified to eliminate a group of people who you perceive to be causing you harm. There's 2 dots on an otherwise blank sheet of paper, I don't understand how you still can't connect them. You're exactly the same as Nazis except with a different Boogeyman.
1
@brothersandsistersofvalhalla yes, they thought that by eliminating the "lesser" people, they would have a greater society. Not unlike the left today, you're just still in the phase of trying to convert people. But you believe the principle that the end justifies the means, and you're completely ok with political violence. It's only a matter of time before you start advocating for killing the people you can't convert. Just like communists always do.
1