Comments by "Mark Zuckergecko" (@markzuckergecko621) on "Tucker Forces Texas Governor To Pardon Psycho Murderer | The Kyle Kulinski Show" video.

The guy was approaching him, rifle in hand. That is a threat. This is open and shut self defense, anyone who has a gun in their hand is presenting a reasonable threat to your life, and you have a right to defend yourself. He should have never been convicted in the first place.
16
Criticizing a jew is not the same, or even close to the same thing as criticizing Jews. One person is not representative of any entire group that they belong to.
9
Yep, that's what Kyle does.
6
Kyle could just claim it's "opinion", which it is. There's really nothing there for a defamation suit unless you can show tangible damage directly due to the unfair or inaccurate comments someone else made. But Kyle is definitely being deliberately dishonest about this case, as he usually does, because he knows his idiot audience doesn't know any better.
5
Why? It's not like he killed a person, it was just a communist. If you ask me he should get a hefty reward from the state. Exterminators get paid to kill bugs, and bugs are far more useful than communists.
4
Imagine if the scenario was a little different, there's a bunch of armed Proud Boys protesting, one of them approaches a motorist, moving their rifle from their back and into their hands. Would that driver be justified in shooting them?
3
@ThunderHOWL16 imagine if it had been a Proud Boys protest, one of them approaches a motorist, rifle in hand. What do you think Kyle's "consistent" perspective of that would be?
2
@Chevalier1632 he didn't point the gun at him from anything I saw, but he did have the gun in his hand. That makes this an open and shut self defense case, it doesn't matter what you're pointing the gun at, if you have a gun in your hand, in public, that's considered "ready to use". You can change what you're aiming at in less than a second, so it doesn't really matter where he's pointing it, the gun should have been kept on his back if he wasn't intending to use it.
2
Yes. If a lunatic with a rifle in his hand approaches you, you have the right to stop the imminent threat. That is the law.
1
@donaldford2849 that doesn't mean he's planning on killing someone because he wants to, it means he's aware there's a horde of armed communist terrorists outside. If he had just shot someone who wasn't pointing a gun towards him, you might have a point. But as per usual, reality is directly contradictory to the leftist narrative.
1
@TheBeeFactory no, he was part of a violent communist mob that was threatening everyone in the area. You knew that though, you're just a liar, like all communists.
1
@Gambit0590 I love how you're too stupid to realize you're accidentally admitting that BLM is a terrorist organization.
1
Isn't that what every progressive DA does? And they release actual murderers, not people who killed someone in self defense.
1
@sergioleal613 you're actually illiterate, aren't you?
1
@sergioleal613 there is no case for banning weapons, even psychotic leftists shooting elementary schools is not a case for banning weapons. That's a case for more people to have weapons, so they can defend themselves against psychotic leftists.
1
@Steampunk_Star_Raisin you don't have to point a gun directly at someone to be considered an imminent threat, when you open carry, your handgun must be in a holster or your pants, and your long gun must be strapped to your back, if you remove the gun from that position for ANY reason, you are legally ready to use it, this is a direct threat to anyone around you in a public setting.
1
@trappedinamerica7740 yes, because he was being approached by a man with his gun out. The person who has their gun ready to use first is the aggressor, any action taken against him at that point is self defense.
1
@dipdip907 yes, you have the right to carry a gun. You do not have the right to remove it from it's safe position in a public place, that is a threat.
1
@Steampunk_Star_Raisin open carry is legal, but you have to maintain control of your firearm in public. Removing it from it's strap or holster is not that.
1
@dipdip907 I'm not having anything both ways, proper control of firearms is in the law. Its the same with any weapon, you can walk around with a machete if you want, but if you raise it up and start waving it around at Popeyes, they're definitely going to call the cops on you, and you're going to get arrested and most likely charged with making a violent threat. And if someone were to shoot you while your crazy ass is waving a machete around at Popeyes, they have a solid self defense case.
1
@Steampunk_Star_Raisin so if I'm jaywalking and some crazy dude runs up to me waving a gun around, I don't have a right to defend myself, because I was breaking the law by jaywalking? That's complete nonsense.
1
@Steampunk_Star_Raisin there was no murderer, because the would be murderer was killed in self defense by a good Samaritan.
1
@serjarmen the law is pretty simple on this one, you have a right to self defense if someone presents an imminent threat. Brandishing a weapon is an imminent threat. This is pretty basic shit.
1
@robertaylor9218 if the crowd is blocking traffic just because they feel like it, yes, you can drive through the crowd.
1
@kevinskykevarkevlarindustries there's.... So much wrong with this. Jesus Christ. Go sit down and let adults talk about adult stuff.
1
@Kevo6492 maybe because he's openly bragged about using his financial power to destabilize governments? That could be a reason people aren't a big fan of him.
1
@daryno9048 what the fuck are you talking about? Regular people have a problem with every billionaire that puts unethical financial power into politics, Soros is just the richest and most aggressive of all of them. And yes, there are a shitload of Jewish billionaires compared to the overall Jewish population, for whatever reason that may be. But none of that matters, if people are making criticisms against the specific actions of someone, you don't get to just claim it's actually racism because you want it to be racism. That's the most brain dead logic that's ever been sharted out of anyone's face hole.
1