Comments by "Mark Zuckergecko" (@markzuckergecko621) on "How Reliable Is IQ?" video.
-
37
-
31
-
28
-
Houston all my life, which I've heard is the most ethnically diverse city in the world, I'm not quite sure what that means, maybe it's the most different ethnicities represented in one city, maybe it's something to do with the overall representation of ethnic groups, maybe it's just complete nonsense that I misheard, but either way, it's an extremely ethnically diverse city. And there's a huge, huge difference between people of any particular ethnic group, and ghetto culture. There are certainly strong correlations between certain ethnic groups and ghetto culture, but it knows no bounds, anyone of any ethnicity can become one of them, and anyone can also refuse that life and do better.
14
-
12
-
9
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
@Stevie-J well there's a lot of overlap, and Golden Retrievers are very smart, #4 to be exact. And I take those lists with a grain of salt, it depends on where you look, but the top 4 are consistent, 1 - border collie, 2 - standard poodle, 3 - German Shepard, and 4 - golden retriever. So you were mostly right, it is mostly herding and working dogs, but there's also a lot of overlap there, "working" is pretty nebulous bc herding dogs are essentially working dogs too, it's just a more specific type of working. And there's mostly categorized that way based on their physique, herding dogs typically have a longer, slender frame, as opposed to working dogs being more stout. You can actually make a strong argument that German shepards should be in the working group instead of herding, because they're really not used for herding very often, they're typically used for protection or police work. Retrievers are considering sporting, which again could loosely fit in the more broad category of working. "Working" for the intents of classification usually means guard breeds, like great Danes and mastiffs. Labrador retrievers are very intelligent too, but not as much as Goldens.
4
-
4
-
3
-
Wicker 2 I'm just gonna firmly disagree on homogeneous nations, I think it's fine if nations want to do that, but I also think there's value in having a society that puts merit above ethnicity, like the US is supposed to be. We're obviously not that anymore, we've been subverted by communists, but I don't think multiculturalism is the cause, I think it's just a symptom that's being exploited. I think ethnostates have a right to exist, and people have a right to be only around their own people if they want to, but I don't think that should be enforced in any way on a global scale. As far as hiring I think it would be better to filter out bad candidates based on their candidacy, I don't really give a shit if they're African, or European, or Asian, I care that they can do the job.
3
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1