General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Mark Zuckergecko
Lotuseaters Dot Com
comments
Comments by "Mark Zuckergecko" (@markzuckergecko621) on "How The Concept of Science Has Changed Drastically" video.
Science has never been able to explain everything, and likely never will.
6
@Madonnalitta1 not the same process we have now, but something like peer review has existed as long as we've even attempted to explain things scientifically.
5
@thetruth45678 sure, but I think you can reach a balance, where you understand science and respect the process, but also respect that a lot of the world exists outside of that, or at least outside of our understanding of that. A lot of the "science minded" people you'll run across are very dismissive of anything outside of science, like if you can't quantify it and hold it in your hand, it doesn't matter. And I'm just not going to be that dismissive. Just to be clear, I'm an atheist, I don't think any particular religion has all the answers either. But they're all right about one thing, there are things science can't explain.
4
@theevermind who made the assertion that the purpose of science is to explain everything?
1
@thetruth45678 gravity.
1
@thetruth45678 so explain it.
1
@thetruth45678 why do I have to refute an assertion you made that neither of us can prove? And you haven't explained what gravity is, or why it exists. Because nobody really knows that, all we know is that it exists.
1
@thetruth45678 there it is, now you're finally admitting what both of us knew several posts ago. We do not fully understand gravity. Will we some day? Maybe. But not necessarily. This is my entire point. We just had to take the scenic route to get here, because you're a pretentious jackass.
1
@thetruth45678 and I'm not refuting the point about me being an atheist because you're just trying to manipulate and obfuscate, the exact same way leftists call everyone racist. They don't actually care even if you are racist, they're just trying to put you on defense and argue that you're not racist instead of actually arguing the point. That's exactly what you're doing, and I'm not falling into that manipulative trap. You aren't as smart as you think you are.
1
@thetruth45678 show me the part where I said that the purpose of science is to explain everything? And why haven't you refuted the last point? Why are you trying to shift to another argument, Mr. Genius?
1
@thetruth45678 so..... You can't show me where I said the purpose of science is to explain everything. Because I didn't say that. Good job little fella. Take this L.
1
@thetruth45678 I didn't imply that, you implied that.
1
@thetruth45678 if I meant that the purpose of science is to explain everything, then I would have said that. It's not my fault you make implications and faulty assumptions based on what other people say. Has it ever crossed your mind that might be part of why you're always getting into stupid arguments? It's because you don't listen. It's also probably why you don't have friends, and your parents don't like you.
1
@thetruth45678 I can't control how you distort things in your own head, I can only control what I say. And I never said what you're insisting I "really meant". You're just grasping at straws here, because your undersized brain isn't capable of admitting fault. You're looking more and more like a fool, and it's hilarious.
1
@AusSP would be kinda hard to prove the supernatural though, because if you prove it exists, you probably have some kind of explanation of why and how, otherwise it wouldn't be sufficient proof. And then it wouldn't be supernatural anymore, it would just be natural.
1
@thetruth45678 and the other faulty assumption you're making here is that I was criticizing science for not explaining everything. I never said that, I never even suggested that it was a critique of science as a whole. You just assumed that. So you assumed that I was making an assertion about the purpose of science, which I did not, and you assumed I was making a critique of science, which I was not. You're just assuming things left and right and then pretending like that's the basis of your argument. It's extremely dishonest. But you know that. That's why you're getting so pissed off. Liars don't like when people notice they're liars.
1
@thetruth45678 it's a very simple statement, I don't know why you're trying so hard to make it mean something else. You're really showing your dishonesty here. And I don't know why you insist I'm not an atheist. You must have some pretty deep mental health problems. Maybe the internet isn't for you.
1
@thetruth45678 is that really how you're going to try to get the last word?
1