Comments by "Mark Zuckergecko" (@markzuckergecko621) on "David Pakman Show"
channel.
-
47
-
33
-
27
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
21
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@S7J7P7 why do you think nearly all celebrities pretend to be leftists? You don't actually think they give a shit about social justice and all your other make believe nonsense you know nothing about, do you? They've done their homework, they know leftists will spaz the fuck out and form an internet lynch mob if they don't pretend to care about what you pretend to care about, and normal people don't care, if we like someone's movies, or music, or how they play a sport, we'll still watch it even if they have stupid political opinions. So they pretend to have the same stupid political opinions as you, because you're stupid, and they'll get more money that way. Jesus Christ it's so damn obvious, honestly I thought everyone knew that, even leftists.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@jackeagleeye3453 MJ wasn't bad at baseball, the fact that he could pick it back up at that age, at the highest level and even compete was nothing short of superhuman. And his overall stat line from his stint playing baseball is very misleading, he started off really bad, as to be expected, but he started to play really good ball at the end of the year, he was even selected for the minor league winter league, which means he was one of the best minor leaguers. And sure, a lot of that was name recognition, but if he had returned to the Whitesox instead of going back to basketball, in all likelihood he would have made it to the major league level.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@briankorth6763 I've voted Republican all my life, not because I love them, but democrats are just so, so, soooo awful I can't ever vote for them. Except one time in my local elections there was this democrat named Sam Houston running for some lower office, I live in Houston, I had to vote for him. Because that's awesome. And I realize there's a fair chance he changed his name just to get votes, but whatever, he got me, I appreciate the dedication. But I digress, I actually liked Trump more than any President within my lifetime, he was far from perfect, I wished he would have shut his big stupid mouth sometimes, but on policy I thought he was great, pre covid he was letting average Americans keep more of their own money, he was pushing back against far leftism. The establishment hated him, and I hate the establishment, so that was hilarious. I'm really closer to libertarian than conservative, but I agree with conservatives more than liberals, and I agree with leftists about basically nothing. In a perfect world I would rather vote for someone with similar fiscal policy to Trump but with a better attitude. But he was good enough for me, and attitude isn't really the number one thing I'm looking for in a politician anyway, they're all scumbags. Otherwise they wouldn't be politicians, they would get a real job.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@thesmilingtouristguide4931 that's pretty nebulous, that sounds like things you just see as basic, that you're arbitrarily labeling as "basic rights" to appeal to emotions and make it seem like anyone who disagrees with you is a bad person. There are only 2 kinds of rights, positive rights, that are allowed by a governing authority, and negative rights, or natural rights, that can't be granted because they can only be taken away. A positive right would be health insurance, you're not born with the right to have health insurance, it requires someone to offer insurance and enforcement from the government. You're demanding the right to someone's labor, at the barrel of a gun. A negative right is the right to free speech, you don't have to ask for the right to say whatever you want, that right can only be taken away from you.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@hamishgaffaney5323 well there isn't a "2 party system" in the US, it's just that nobody really votes for any party other than Republican or Democrat. It's a pretty complex problem, but there's this attitude that a vote for any other party is a "wasted vote", because they don't have a realistic chance of winning, and you're just taking a vote away from whichever of the 2 major parties you hate less. Because it's really like that, not many people really enthusiastically like Republicans, they just hate them less than Democrats, and not many people enthusiastically like Democrats, they just hate them less than Republicans. And sadly, it's a self fulfilling prophecy, because if most people feel like 3rd party or independent is a wasted vote, then it is. Nothing will change unless people start standing on principle, and are willing to lose a few elections in order for more parties to grow in popularity.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@MichaelJEakin and it only goes in one direction, when a story breaks about a leftist or Democrat, the majority of right wing commentators will say "ok, this is the story, but it's not confirmed, let's wait until we get some more information before any conclusions", because moderates and conservatives want to know the truth, so the people they listen to are at least somewhat beholden to the truth. Not always, obviously, journalism is a shady industry. But the left is completely different. Their audience doesn't give a shit about the truth, they actively avoid the truth. And you NEVER hear a left wing commentator say "ok sorry guys, my bad, we jumped the gun on that story. It's fake." Because they know their audience doesn't care and will never know any better.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@briankorth6763 yea I probably watch as much if not more left wing content than right. I already know what people who agree with me think, I don't need to listen to that very much. And I miss the good ole days, where "agree to disagree" was more common, maybe I was just younger and naive, and didn't realize how bad things were. I don't know, maybe it's been this bad for longer than I realize. But I hate it, one of my good friends' dad is really sick, he's probably going to die within the year. And he's an insane Trump hater, to the point that he STILL won't speak to other family members who support Trump. Even after his cancer diagnosis. It's breaking my friend's heart, she can't stand to see her dad being this stubborn even to what might literally be his dying breath, she's just like FFS, get over it and call your sister and tell her you love her. While you can. It's completely insane.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Cancellator5000 utter nonsense, leftism is authoritarianism, right wing ideology is freedom. That's the left/right paradigm as simply put as possible, right wing ideology means individual liberty, that opens the door for insecurity, because there is less to fall back on, but it doesn't shift towards authoritarianism. Leftism means collectivism, which will always inherently lead to authoritarianism, when you value security over liberty, you have to outsource that to an authority. Most leftists are too stupid to understand this, most people wouldn't willingly walk into authoritarianism, so that's why stupid people and immoral people are the primary targets for leftist indoctrination, and kids who just don't know any better.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Hattie Lankford which is precisely why laws are written with bad actors in mind, whether or not you think most people will take advantage of a policy or a law is irrelevant, the only thing that matters is if people can take advantage of it, because if the answer is yes, then some people inevitably will, and it's not a good law or policy to put into legislation. There was never a time where victims couldn't come forward with accusations, that's not a thing that ever existed in the United States, that's pure fantasy invented by the left. I understand that there are societal factors and other complicated issues that might make it difficult for victims to come forward with accusations, but that doesn't mean that you can't, it just means it may be difficult. But the metoo movement irrefutably made things objectively worse, the wheel was turned way too far in the opposite direction and now people's lives are being destroyed over completely bogus accusations. You can't take that damage back. Those people's lives and reputations are ruined forever. You've already done a lot of damage. The best thing you can do now is to have the humility to admit you were wrong, and reverse course before more innocent people's lives are ruined. And I'm not just talking about men who were falsely accused. Women who were victimized have had their lives ruined too, because wolf has been cried so many times that real victims are actually more hesitant to come forward now, because the market has been saturated by fake victims. And yes, it is a market, as sad and disgusting as it is. The left has made being a fake victim a new career path. A very lucrative career path.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You might feel this way if you spend most of your time around leftists, leftists are arrogant, ignorant, and dishonest. Nobody ever wants to admit to what they don't know, so they just pretend to know about things they know nothing about. Normal people aren't like that, if they don't know something they'll just say they don't know, and people that have some sense of humility generally understand the basics of science. Doesn't mean they know everything, obviously, but when you're capable of admitting when you're wrong, and what you don't know, you become capable of learning new things. You lefties should try it some time. It's the first step towards curing leftism.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheCocoaDaddy I would consider him a commentator, just like everyone else that's been mentioned in this thread, although of all of them, Tim Pool could be considered a journalist and a commentator, since he does run his own company reporting on news. I don't think that makes lies by omission any better though, you can have a bias and still report and commentate in an honest way. If I did commentary on the Yankees, and they lost a game 15-9, and I just started talking about how the offense was on point, scored 9 runs, that would be pretty dishonest right? Someone who only watched my commentary and didn't look at the box score or watch the game would probably assume they won, even though that's completely false.
1
-
@TheCocoaDaddy well if you're doing sports commentary, the #1 thing that should be mentioned is the final score of the game. After that, talk about whatever you want, and you can absolutely highlight positive takeaways from a losing effort, and a lot of sports commentators do that, but if all you address is the positive takeaways, completely leave out the negative, including the fact that they lost and it wasn't even particularly close, that's not honest reporting, or commentating. And it's pretty funny you bring up the '20 election, because that's precisely what the biggest takeaway from the Twitter files is, the 2020 election was absolutely not a "free and fair" election, Twitter and the federal government made a coordinated and widespread effort specifically to prevent Trump from winning, and we have the receipts. That's the part his viewers don't know, because him and other left wing pundits actively discourage their viewers from watching anyone on the right, as far as they're concerned, the Twitter files are just conservatives clutching their pearls because Hunter Biden smokes crack, because that's all left wing commentators will touch.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@harrybarrow6222 you need evidence, not me. The burden of proof is on the accuser, when I hear the former president has classified documents, I think, "ok, that sounds fine. He's the former president". You think "orange man bad, orange man is always bad, I don't care about logic, law, or basic reasoning, orange man bad my entire life revolves around orange man bad!!!"
1
-
1
-
1
-
@anamerican1776 oh ok, I guess I see what you mean. Maybe thats a factor too. Lol, I've heard some pretty crazy shit about illegal immigrants coming from Mexican Americans, I live in Houston so I know people from all over the world, predominantly Mexico and other latin countries. And.... Yea. I've heard Mexican Americans just go off about how much they hate illegal immigrants, it's pretty crazy, I'm like woah tiger!!🤣 I get that you don't like them coming here illegally, but I don't put all the blame on the individual, I put it on our lax policies on immigration. When politicians say "nah, that illegal thing isn't illegal, come on over!" You can't really blame people for taking advantage of that. It's just funny to me how the left always wants to act like white Americans are these horrible racists, but if you've ever really talked to people from other countries, they tend to not have the same delicate sensibilities most Americans have, they don't give a fuck, they'll just say exactly what they think.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DjangoMarine-Esq yea that's the Democrat grift, they promise free shit to people who have been told all their lives that they need free shit to survive. While smearing the other side for being all the things that they are. Most people think the KKK support Republicans, that's complete bullshit, all of the racism and that shit is 100% coming from the Democrat side, always has been. It's all lies. It's all well calculated lies, specifically targeted at people with specific personality flaws. That's your real indentured servitude right there. Break out of that and a lot more things will start to make more sense to you. And then you're going to be pissed as hell, because you'll really start to realize how much of your life up to this point has been a lie. But once you get over that essential anger, and you'll be right to be angry, you should be. What the Democrats have done to this country is truly one of the most evil things that's ever been done in political history, I really mean that. No hyperbole, they're on the same level as Nazi Germany and communist Russia. But things in your personal life will start to get better too.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@SandhillCrane42 so basically what you've demonstrated is that your tiny brain is only capable of thinking in extremes, you think the only options are to never take personal responsibility for anything, under and circumstances (left leaning, apparently), or that everything is always the sole responsibility of the individual, in all circumstances (right leaning, apparently). Meanwhile, in reality, the overwhelming majority of people are somewhere in the middle. But you can't comprehend that, because you're completely bat shit insane, and your brain is a potato.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@seanhraba747 I can't see the comment you're responding too, but a flerfer is a flat earther, and YEC is "young earth creationist", the nutty evangelicals that think the Bible is 100% accurate, and that the earth is 7,000 years old or some stupid shit like that. I think some of them say 10,000 years, I dunno, they can't even get their own incorrect story straight. Leftist propaganda has convinced stupid people that every conservative in the US is some kind of religious fanatic, because leftists are stupid, and they would believe you're supposed to eat soup with a fork if a leftist thought leader told them so. Because they're stupid.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@morganblackhand2904 there is an absolute epidemic of people taking time off, calling in sick, showing up late, and overall just doing a shit job. I'm 38, been in the working world for about 22 years now, consistently. And what I've seen in the last 2 years is mind numbingly awful, not just at my own job, but absolutely everywhere I go as a customer. More and more incompetent, lazy, entitled people, expecting to get a paycheck just because the show up at their job somewhere in the vicinity of their scheduled time and stay their until somewhere in the vicinity of their scheduled time off. It seems like about 10% of the people in the American work force actually work these days.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@feathersigil2048 because they start to view the world less like they want it to be, and more like it actually is. I already stated this earlier, it's really pretty basic psychology. Leftism is idealistic, right wing philosophy is realistic. Leftism only works based off of how leftists think people should act, that's not practical for the real world, people don't always act the way you want them to. Even if they did, that doesn't mean that behavior is good or correct. It's not up to you to decide how people should act, and laws shouldn't be written based on how you want people to act, they should be written based on how people actually act, and according to promoting the best behaviors, not forcing them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The overwhelming majority of mass shootings are gang hits. The media is able to do a bait and switch, every time there's a shooting at a school it gets wall to wall coverage for days or even weeks, and then they show you how many mass shootings there have been, to make you think all of them were school shootings, when that's just completely false, there will be 30 or 40 gang hits that they never mention, and they make you think it's 30 or 40 school shootings. "School shooting" also means every single time a gun is discharged in a school, that includes suicides and accidental discharges, like some idiot kid brings his dad's gun to school to show off. Even if nobody is hit, that counts as a "school shooting" for the sake of statistics. So every time the media says "mass shooting" or "school shooting", they're deliberately misleading you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@debbieknight8901 but you tried to bait me into some "gotcha" about legal asylum seekers, to which I was honest about, because there is such thing as legal asylum seekers, but I made the valid point that the majority of people illegally crossing the border are not asylum seekers, which you ignored because your entire point was trying to excuse all migration as being legal asylum seekers, which you and I both know is not true. Again, you're being dishonest, not me. That's why you're trying to end the conversation, because you didn't expect me to be honest, probably because you mostly interact with other leftists. None of you are honest people, if you were an honest person, you wouldn't be a leftist.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@onetwo8847 let's say there are 2 restaurants by your house, pretty much the same quality, or at least comparable, but one of them has a small parking lot and you have to park across the street a lot. So you usually go to the other one. If I were being dishonest, and trying to make you seem silly, I would say you don't go there because you're too lazy to park and walk across the street. And there's some truth to that, that's the main reason you choose the other restaurant, but that's still a dishonest way for me to phrase it, and it's deliberately dishonest, because the whole truth is that you like that restaurant fine, it's just that the other restaurant is just as good and has a better parking situation. Does that make sense?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@seanm8030 conservatives are moderate, "always" and "never" don't come up very often in conservative ideology because the general framework is that social and political issues should be taken on a case by case basis, and there is an exception to very many things. And generally speaking we want a culture that promotes traditional Judeo-Christian family values, that you should judge people by their character and actions rather than by their identity, that you should be respectful of the people around you as long as they're respectful towards you, we want a small government that mostly focuses on matters of defense and liberty, and that states rights are usually more important than sweeping federal legislation, although there is a reason that the fed exists, there should be a certain degree of uniformity in law and economics, we want lower taxes, we don't want to heavily penalize the wealthy, we believe in constitutional law, and that we shouldn't be militantly tough on crime but that we do need to be tough on crime to an extent, that freedom is important but only as long as it doesn't come at the expense of national security or encroaching on other people's freedoms.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
For real, 15% is considered standard, with as shit as the economy is right now, I consider that pretty low, I suppose it's still fair. Anything less than that though, you're just a cockface. There's no 2 ways about it, unless you got bad service. If you can't afford to tip the waitstaff a decent share, then you can't afford to eat out. I tell people all the time though, NEVER stiff a tip, even if you got absolutely terrible service. Give them a shitty tip if you got shitty service. If you just don't tip them at all, then they may think you're just a stingy cockface. Tipping is their income, but it's also their feedback, if you give them a bad tip then they know they did something wrong. If you don't tip them at all, they don't know if it's you or them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The likelihood becomes a lot greater if their intent isn't to have a very specific, laser focused result, but rather just to push things in a certain direction. Meaning they can't really predict the outcome with absolute certainty, but they can sure as hell push the ship in the direction they want it to go. I don't understand, I see progressives constantly complaining about the wealthy elites, and how they control everything. It's pretty much the only thing leftists are right about, and I mean that literally. You're just wrong about everything else that surrounds that, the reasons it got that way, the ways it can get better, etc etc. Basically if you just sit down and shut up, disengage with politics for the rest of your lives, things will get better. You're the cause of all the things you complain about, and you continually make it all worse.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@richardowens9061 conservatives have varying views about immigration, some want to only stop illegal immigration and allow all the rest, some want to be more selective even with legal immigration, and some want to stop it all together. I'm personally of the 1st category, I personally don't care where someone comes from as long as they come here the legal way and pay taxes, I also want a vast overhaul of the welfare system, we should stop paying degenerate losers like you with free funny money so you can continue to be a degenerate losers, taking care of you isn't my responsibility, it's yours. And you're just completely incorrect about the second part about most immigrants coming legally, you're lying through your teeth, because you're a liar, and your parents don't like you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@vercoda9997 and it's not as crazy as it may sound either, disinfectants are used in medicine all the time, vaccines have disinfectants in them, radiation and chemotherapy is a disinfectant. And it's not like he was saying "hey everyone, you should shoot up random household cleaners!" like you lunatics make it out to be, he was just spit balling some ideas, like "hey, I heard of disinfectant therapy for some diseases and infections, maybe we could try that?" Even if he was wrong, so what? He's just asking about possible solutions, there's nothing wrong with that. You people are out of your tiny little minds. Of course you're also Irish so you might be drunk, so I'll give you a little leeway if that's the case.
1
-
@briankorth6763 yea shits crazy these days, but I think a lot of people are having a short term memory crisis and seem to think Trump was the cause, no, he was the effect, shit was not normal before he even announced his candidacy. Damn, he never could have even had a chance of winning the Republican nomination in a political climate that made any damn sense. This insanity started a long time ago, it's pretty much impossible even point to a time or a reason because it's all been so slow and gradual, until it hyped up and started getting crazy super fast. I don't know the answer either, I hate to be Dr. Black Pill, but there may not be an answer, we very well may be in the "end phase" of the United States as a world power. And as many, many, many people who are smarter than me have predicted, we're destroying ourselves from the inside out.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@belikewater420 you honestly don't find it odd that before the riots Fauci was saying masks don't really do much, and IMMEDIATELY after the riots he flip flopped on that and democrats were all pushing mask mandates? Do you think that's just a coincidence, or do you not even remember that that's how it happened? A lot of people don't, or just haven't made the connection. And how many democrat politicians and pundits have been caught breaking their own mandates, and the mandates they advocated for? It was happening pretty much on a weekly basis for a while. And you can't shrug that off as just isolated instances of them being hypocrites, if they were genuinely as concerned as they're trying to tell everyone else to be, then they would follow their restrictions for their own self preservation. But they don't. They're out on the town, maskless, getting their hair done and going to parties. Because they don't care. They just want you to care. And they should be extra cautious too, considering most of them are a thousand years old. I know you know what I'm saying is true. This has always been about politics, not safety. People who are concerned about safety, based on verifiable data don't have to lie. Because the data should speak for itself.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@briankorth6763 yea the whole wokeness thing is bonkers, and self defeating. They say it's about kindness and empathy, but shriek like insane harpies at anyone who doesn't comply. That's not very kind or empathetic in the reality I live in. And I believe in respecting people's identity and shit like that too, I try to never make fun of people for any kind of immutable characteristics unless it's someone I know well, and I'm just busting their balls. And I don't even usually joke like that anyway, I don't find cruel humor that funny in the real world, only in movies and shit. But I'm also firmly against trying to police what other people say and believe, it's not up to me to decide. If someone wants to be racist or bigoted in some way, I don't like it, I don't agree with them, but they have the right to have those ideas. They just don't have the right to act on those ideas in a way that harms someone. That's the part I don't get about the people who go way over the top with that stuff and will actually advocate for and excuse violence in the name of "anti racism", that defeats the whole purpose, racism is bad because it can lead people down a road that leads to violence, so they're basically just cutting out the racism middle man and going straight to the violence part. It's completely nuts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@NoName-cn3cp if all insurance was voluntary, the rates would be a fraction of what they are. Let's say car insurance is no longer required by law, it would still definitely be a good idea to have it, because a lot of people can't afford to fix their car out of pocket if they get in a wreck that's not their fault. But you don't have to. An insurance company offers it for $200 a month, you can just say nah that's dumb, I'm good. They could probably charge $20 a month and still turn a profit. They just charge the ridiculous rates they do because they can, because your only option is another company, you don't have the option of just saying no all together. And I've heard the old argument about people leaving the scene if they don't have insurance, blah blah, people already do that anyway, they don't leave because they don't have insurance, they leave because it's illegal to not have insurance. We could still track down hit and run offenders with or without insurance. Same principles apply to absolutely all forms of insurance.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@trishayamada807 but you're still taking the time to voice your disapproval of something, exactly the same as the caller did, and pretending like that means they somehow have a pathetic life. But it's not pathetic when you do it? I don't understand what part of this you don't understand. It's really not difficult. And remember, this is your standard, not mine. I don't give a shit if you take the time to make a negative complaint, or positive feedback, do whatever you want, I don't think that has any impact necessarily on whether or not someone has a meaningful life. But according to your own standard, you're equally as pathetic as the caller. Actually more so, because you've now taken the time to complain about the caller, and my comment.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gerttopmuller I've always thought the "born this way" argument was weird and inconsistent, if your friends give you shit because of a kind of food you eat, you wouldn't get defensive and start saying you can't help it, and you were just born with your taste buds. Because it doesn't matter, you can like whatever food you want to like, you don't have to defend it or justify it. And it probably has something to do with your taste buds, something to do with the way you were raised, and something to do with just acquiring a taste for certain things. It's probably all of that, to varying degrees. Can be interesting to think and talk about, but that's all. There's no moral implications to it. If someone genuinely thinks there's nothing wrong with being gay or trans, then they wouldn't bother trying to justify it as inherent, they would just say yea so what? If you think about it, anyone who argues "born this way" is basically accidentally admitting they think there's something wrong with being gay or trans.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@whyamimrpink78 I thought the 2 week lockdown was dumb, if you know anything about how viruses spread, you knew it wouldn't do much. But I was like fine, whatever, if that's what will get people to chill the fuck out, we can do it, but it ain't gonna be 2 weeks. I was telling people on the first day that there's no chance in hell it's actually gonna be 2 weeks, they're gonna milk it as long as possible. They all called me crazy. I was right. And the hilarious part if you remember, is before everything really hit, and the news of covid had been swirling around, conservatives were the ones saying hey guys, maybe we should be careful about travelling and stuff, just be on the look out, democrats and the left flipped out and called us racist, said it was no big deal and we were blowing it out of proportion. Then once it hit and the left flipped out, they completely forgot that we were the ones trying to warn them a few weeks earlier. Then a few weeks later when we learned it's really not that deadly, everything shifted again and they doubled down. Completely insane when you actually have enough brain cells to remember the whole bat shit insane timeline. Leftists don't. That's why they're so easily manipulated. They don't even remember what they were told to believe 3 days ago.
1
-
@IPeeInPoolz leftism is a cult. Science is never settled, even scientists don't "trust the science", that's why they're scientists. Because they want to question science and learn new things. Science doesn't work like that, we never know anything, we test everything because we want to know more about what we know about. "Trust the science" is an incredibly creepy rallying cry, that's how you know leftism is a cult, there's numerous other signs and telltale features of a cult but that's one of the main things that really hammers it home. None of the people who say that actually know anything about science or the scientific process, it's just something they say because they've been told to say it, it doesn't actually add anything to any discussion, it only affirms their beliefs. It's the same as when someone says "the father knows all" or "trust the method" or any number of other creepy as fuck things violent cults have repeated in the past while they commit horrific, violent crimes. The Manson family was 100% sure what they were doing was right, and for the greater good. They were wrong. The left now is exactly the same, except there's millions of them. Fucking horrifying.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@IPeeInPoolz it's the same as how the "cool kids" in middle school would be mean as hell to any of the nerds or people they decided were "others" but if they were neighbors or somehow acquainted outside of school, their behavior would be completely different, they would actually treat the nerd like a civilized, normal person. It's because leftists don't actually believe the things they claim to believe online, it's all an act, they're showing off for their friends. And in leftist circles, being the furthest left is how you become the cool kid, you cannot show any kind of respect or basic courtesy to one of the dirty right wingers. It's the exact opposite in right wing circles, people respect people who have reasoned, well thought out positions, not necessarily centrist or moderate, but going as far to the right as possible isn't something that people strive for. That's why the right isn't and never will be as extreme as the left, there's a natural governing factor, extremism isn't seen as a virtue like it is on the left.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@canuckprogressive.3435 take a look at some numbers comparing welfare paid by taxes and church donations, per Capita in areas that have strong church attendence. It's pretty telling. You don't have to believe in God to see the positive impact faith has on society, I'm an atheist, but I love Christians, most of my favorite people I've ever met were Christian. Finding something that drives you towards being a good person isn't that easy, it's not the default setting for humans. Our default setting is to be ruthless, and self serving, because that's the easiest way to survive and thrive within a cooperative society. Getting people to voluntarily cooperate with you is a lot harder than getting them to involuntarily help you through deception. It doesn't have to be god, or any particular religion, or religion at all, you just have to believe you're not the most important thing in the universe. Even if you concede that you don't know what the most important thing in the universe is.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@leothenomad5675 there are tons of words people say differently, pecan, potato, etc etc. I know a name is slightly different, since it's a proper noun, but people aren't necessarily being intentionally disrespectful if they say it wrong. I already explained this. Just stop, you're all making a mountain out of a molehill, and you know it. I would possibly consider taking you seriously if the left wasn't constantly calling people stuff like "Drumpf", or "Ben Shabeebo", and "Toe Rogan" and all the rest. And to be clear I don't really give a shit if you say any of those insults either, because I'm not a crybaby that makes a deal out of people being immature and insulting, and those absolutely are instances of leftists being intentionally disrespectful, not just simply mispronouncing a name. My last name is kinda long, it has a pretty obvious pronounciation but people somehow butcher it horribly, constantly. And I don't freak out about it. It's kind of annoying, I'll try to be polite and just tell them the proper pronounciation, but I don't take it as some kind of personal insult against me.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1