Comments by "Mark Zuckergecko" (@markzuckergecko621) on "Libertarian Socialist Pansexual's Mom is a White Nationalist" video.

@rimbusjift7575 no, that's anarchy. Libertarianism is minimizing government interference.
5
"Libertarian socialist" is such nonsense, if you think people should be taxed at a higher rate for being more successful, so they can bankroll people who are less successful, you're not a libertarian.
3
@alanbeaumont4848 so do you think most people would just willfully pay taxes if they didn't have to?
2
There are people who claim to be Anarcho communists too. Makes no damn sense at all.
2
@undergrounddojokeyboardcag701 it has to do with the fact that you can't claim to be libertarian while advocating for an economic system that requires force.
2
It's the same as bi, except it's more "inclusive" towards genders other than male or female. So it's bi plus insane.
2
Hey man, sauce pans shouldn't dress like that if they don't want us to look at them like that.
2
@alanbeaumont4848 the point is, if the majority of people wouldn't do something without being forced, it's probably not a libertarian ideal. And no, not an anarchist, I'm somewhere between conservative and libertarian.
1
@alanbeaumont4848 and what did I say that contradicts that?
1
@alanbeaumont4848 so read more slowly, ask for a spotter if it helps.
1
@Jacob B I'm pretty sure most people won't just willfully surrender their property to "the collective", so I don't know what you're on about. Socialism is inherently authoritarian.
1
So.... It's not libertarianism.
1
@Jacob B so what happens when someone doesn't want to "pay their fair share"?
1
@undergrounddojokeyboardcag701 no, it's a direct contradiction. Socialism and communism require heavy enforcement economically, which comes hand in hand with heavy social enforcement. This is a direct contradiction to everything it means to be libertarian, communists and socialists are authoritarian, by definition.
1
Dr. Osterman I love it when leftists accidentally admit that violent coercion is the only way their ideas can exist.
1
@undergrounddojokeyboardcag701 well most people who own property aren't just going to give it to the "collective" because they're cool dudes like that. It requires force. Not libertarian.
1
@undergrounddojokeyboardcag701 ok, but if you think the state should force people to give you their property, you're not a libertarian.
1
@Jacob B ok, who gets to decide what the acceptable violence is?
1
@undergrounddojokeyboardcag701 but all communism rejects the idea of private property ownership, which is a major cornerstone of libertarian philosophy. These 2 ideas cannot possibly be more opposite.
1
@Jacob B that's complete nonsense, the idea of property rights applies to everyone, not just the people with a lot of property. Just because someone has more than you doesn't mean they stole it from someone, you really need to grow up. I've met 8 year olds that have a more mature outlook on life. Go get a job and make yourself useful.
1
@Jacob B lmao, how do you suppose a society would be free, while roaming bands of far left lunatics are just attacking and murdering anyone they decide is a "despot"? That's not liberty, that's chaos. And I know you're not smart enough to understand this concept, but you wouldn't have a monopoly on violence, someone could just decide that you're a despot and come for you. Which they would, because surely nobody likes you, not even your family. You would have many enemies in this structure, with no government to protect your useless ass.
1
@undergrounddojokeyboardcag701 but there are some common things all forms of communism share, otherwise it wouldn't be communism. And communism always requires coercion and force, otherwise it wouldn't be communism. Not libertarian. There's no explaining this away.
1
@undergrounddojokeyboardcag701 the collective ownership of goods and property is the literal opposite of libertarianism though. You cannot use mental gymnastics to get out of this, you're just not libertarian, you're authoritarian, period, by absolutely every reasonable measure. It's absurd that anyone would even attempt to argue against this.
1
@rimbusjift7575 that's just word salad to mask the fact that you don't understand the difference between libertarian and anarchist.
1
@rimbusjift7575 so whoever made the pasted quote was just making up word salad.
1
@seanm8030 anarchy is a complete absence of authority and/or hierarchy, libertarianism is minimizing the role of government and maximizing personal autonomy and liberty while adhering to the non aggression principle.
1
@rimbusjift7575 so what does that make anarchy then?
1
@rimbusjift7575 that's nonsense, there's no clearly defined line between social and economic in political terms.
1
@rimbusjift7575 I'm just trying to make sense of your psycho babble nonsense. I don't think I'm alone here either. If I keep you talking, the law of probability would suggest you'll eventually say something that makes sense. Even if by accident.
1
@rimbusjift7575 lmao, oh, I remember you now. You're the same psycho from the Viced Rhino videos. I remember you asking the same question when you've been backed into a wall by other people exposing you for just talking out of your ass with no idea what you're even talking about.
1
@seanm8030 yes, I'm aware that authoritarians have trouble comprehending the concept of liberty. It's why communists think everyone else is a fascist, and fascists think everyone else is a communist.
1
Would you even have to say it though? You can just say "I'm from Portland" and everyone assumes you're some kind of make believe identity.
1