Comments by "Valen Ron" (@valenrn8657) on "" video.

CCP is testing its long-range guidance system.
4
@paoloorate2265 On 24 April 2013, the district court of The Hague sentenced Dutch businessman Frans van Anraat to payment of damages to the victims of mustard-gas attacks in Iraq and Iran in the 1980s. ---- Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government (since its formation) had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq
1
@hongkongpong5588 China has an anti-foreigner "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" protectionist policy. For scope, from tradebarrierindex_org Trade Barrier Index 2021 with a lower tariff score has fewer trade barriers. New Zealand's tariff score is 2.92 Australia's tariff score is 3.03 UK's tariff score is 3.94 Japan's tariff score is 4.05 US's tariff score is 4.54 Germany's tariff score is 4.88 EU's tariff score is 4.88 China's tariff score is 5.68 Russia's tariff score is 6.16 India's tariff score is 8.18
1
@sammanis9148 That's a false narrative, most western and northern EU members are also members of 14 Eyes.
1
@sammanis9148 China has invaded Vietnam more than once Han conquest of Nanyue (111 BC) Trung sisters' rebellion (40-43 AD) Lady Triệu Rebellion (248) Lý Nam Đế Rebellion (543) Sui–Former Lý War (602) Mai Thúc Loan Rebellion (713–723) Phùng Hưng Rebellion (791) Tĩnh Hải-Southern Han War (930) Dương Đình Nghệ Rebellion (931) 2nd Tĩnh Hải-Southern Han War (938) Former Lê-Song War (981) Lý–Song War (1075–1077) Mongol invasions of Đại Việt (1257–1288) Ming invasion of Đại Ngu (1406–07) Later Trần revolt (1407–1413) Lam Sơn uprising (1418–1427) Naval battle in the Gulf of Tonkin between Yang Yandi and the Lê dynasty (Dương Ngạn Địch) (1682) Qing invasion of Đại Việt (1789) Battle of the Paracel Islands (1974) Sino-Vietnamese War (1979) Sino-Vietnamese conflicts (1979–1991) (including Johnson South Reef Skirmish (1988)) ----
1
@sammanis9148 >being member of a mafia gang doesn't means you are not a bad guy That's a red herring. Your "mafia gang" comment is garbage.
1
@richardlu4195 Any discussion about CCP's trade practices in the western sphere is branded as Chinese hate.
1
@richardlu4195 CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about AU's reciprocal policies.
1
@sammanis9148 During Sino-Burmese Wars, Imperial China invaded the Konbaung dynasty of Burma (Myanmar) multiple times. During the 4th Sino-Burmese Wars starting in 1768, Imperial China invaded the Kingdom of Burma. Burma hired European musketeers and gunners, hence Burma allied itself with the rising French Empire against Imperial China's invasion. --- Faced with a powerful Imperial China in the northeast and a resurgent Siam in the southeast, Burma's King Bodawpaya and his army invaded eastern territories of India, hence bringing the rising British East India Company into the fray which defeated the Kingdom of Burma. The First Anglo-Burmese War (1824–1826) ended in a British East India Company victory, British East India Company is allied with mostly Hindu Maratha Empire. The Maratha Empire allied with the British East India Company (based in the Bengal Presidency) against the Mysore Kingdom. Anglo-Mysore Wars started in 1767.
1
@sammanis9148 The Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng) were a series of military campaigns launched by the Qing dynasty of China in the mid–late 18th century during the reign of the Qianlong Emperor (r. 1735–1796). They included three to enlarge the area of Qing control in Inner Asia: two against the Dzungars (1755–1757) and the "pacification" of Xinjiang (1758–1759). The other seven campaigns were more in the nature of police actions on frontiers already established: two wars to suppress the Gyalrong of Jinchuan, Sichuan, another to suppress the Taiwanese Aboriginals (1787–88), and four expeditions abroad against the Burmese (1765–1769), the Vietnamese (1788–1789), and the Gurkhas on the border between Tibet and Nepal (1790–1792), with the last counting as two. Imperial China is an imperialist power that led to the engagement with European imperialist empires. Look in the mirror.
1
@sammanis9148 Both China and Russia are the two surviving "old world" imperial empires that largely preserved their imperial land territories. The British Empire doesn't exist. The Spanish Empire doesn't exist. The French Empire doesn't exist. The Portuguese Empire doesn't exist. The Dutch (Netherlands) Empire doesn't exist. The German Empire doesn't exist. The Italian Empire doesn't exist. The Japanese Empire doesn't exist. Mainland Europeans that lost their respective empires formed the European Union i.e. the wannabe United States of Europe.
1
@sammanis9148 The narrative "America trying to divide up China" is FALSE.
1
@sammanis9148 Facts: Vietnam kicked Imperialist China out. CE 40 - The Trung Sisters Rebellion occurs against the Han Chinese rule. They temporarily overthrow the Han. 43 - The Han crush the rebels and retake control. The Chinese dominate Vietnam until 544. 544 - The Early Ly Dynasty is founded by Ly Nam De. Ly Nam De becomes the first emperor of Vietnam. 602 - The Chinese once again conquer Vietnam. 938 - Ngo Quyen leads the Vietnamese forces to victory over the Chinese at the Battle of Bach Dang. 939 - Ngo Quyen becomes king of Vietnam and founds the Ngo Dynasty. 968 - The Dihn Dynasty begins. 981 - An invasion by the Song Dynasty of China is defeated. 1009 - The Later Ly Dynasty begins. 1075 - The government begins to use examinations to select minor officials. 1225 - The Tran Dynasty begins. 1258 - The Mongols first invade Vietnam, but are driven back. 1400 - The Ho Dynasty Begins. 1407 - The Chinese conquer Vietnam again. The country is ruled by the Ming Dynasty. 1428 - Le Loi overthrows the Chinese and founds the Le Dynasty. Vietnam declares its independence. 1471 - The Dai Viet people conquer the Champa of southern Vietnam. 1802 - The Nguyen Dynasty takes control and names the country Vietnam. It will be the last ruling family of Vietnam. Ho Chi Minh 1858 - France takes control of Vietnam making it a French colony.
1
@sammanis9148 The U.S. position on Taiwan’s international status is “undetermined,” in accordance with the outcome of the 1951-52 San Francisco Peace Treaty. In that treaty, Japan had formally ceded sovereignty over the island, but it was not decided to whom. Most countries at the 1951 Peace Conference argued that Taiwan’s status needed to be determined in due time, in accordance with the principle of self-determination enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations. Post-WW2, Taiwan and the Pescadores islands are not handed to China, and KMT is a foreign government in exile under the American occupation of Japanese Taiwan islands. In Taiwan, the KMT government was politically defeated by partly aboriginal Taiwanese Tsai Ing-wen Democratic Progressive Party. On the eve of the 1894 Sino-Japanese War, about 45 percent of the island was administered under the Manchus Qing administration (Imperial China) while the remaining was populated by Taiwanese aborigines. Imperialist Manchus Qing's Imperial China didn't fully control Taiwan.
1
@sammanis9148 Most US intervention is against "old-world" imperialist powers. Look in the mirror, hypocrite.
1
@sammanis9148 Facts: Imperialist PRC grabs some of the Philippines' territory. Your support of Imperial China's actions in the PRC context proves my point about PRC being the Imperial China variant.
1
@kadikagbay9217 FALSE. An exclusive economic zone (EEZ), as prescribed by the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, is an area of the sea in which a sovereign state has special rights regarding the exploration and use of marine resources, including energy production from water and wind. It stretches from the outer limit of the territorial sea (12 nautical miles from the baseline) out to 200 nautical miles (nmi) from the coast of the state in question.
1
@kadikagbay9217 That's a red herring. Note why the issue is called "territorial disputes" in the South China Sea.
1
@kadikagbay9217 Wrong, "Territorial disputes" in the South China Sea involve Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) AND island territorial disputes.
1
@kadikagbay9217 FYI, Indonesia and Vietnam settled their maritime boundary dispute on December 23, 2022. 😅🤣😂
1
@kadikagbay9217 BULLSHIT
1
@kadikagbay9217 The Philippines-Indonesia Maritime Border Agreement was signed in 2019. Bilateral cooperation between Indonesia and the Philippines experiences a major uplift. One of the developments accomplished is the completion of the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) Boundary ratification process between both countries. The news was conveyed by President Joko Widododuring a bilateral meeting with President Rodrigo R Duterte of the Philippines on the sidelines of the 34th ASEAN Summit in Athenee Hotel, Bangkok, Thailand, on Saturday night (22/6). “I appreciate the smooth completion of the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) boundary ratification process between Indonesia and the Philippines," said the President. Foreign Ministers of the two countries plan to exchange the ratification documents in Jakarta next August 2019. This ratification will provide legal certainty to law enforcement and improve maritime sector cooperation. “I suggest we each assign our team to immediately commence the negotiation on Continent Shelf," said President Jokowi. Continuing on bilateral issues, President Jokowi communicated the plan of the country's private sector to intensify trade and investment in the Philippines. “I also hope that Your Excellency's granting on the exemption of Indonesian instant coffee and ceramic products from the price-based special safeguard list," he continued. Another issue discussed by President Jokowi was the Indo-Pacific cooperation. “I highly appreciate the support and contribution given by the Philippines to the development of the 'ASEAN Outlook on Indo-Pacific Cooperation'," he said. At the beginning of the meeting, the President also expressed his appreciation for the Filipino Government's help in the release of Indonesian hostages. “I believe Your Excellency agrees that we will continue to tighten security cooperation, including in Sulu Sea and the surrounding areas," said President Jokowi. (Source: Presidential Secretariat) ---- Your "You have a Reading Comprehension Problem" assertion is bullshit.
1
@kadikagbay9217 My example is about the conflicting Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) Boundary ratification process between both countries. Your "Sovereign State has special rights not Part of the National Territory!" is a red herring.
1