Comments by "Valen Ron" (@valenrn8657) on "How NATO Solves Its Abandonment Problem" video.

@johnstecziv7842 Manchuria (Manchurian tribe) was a separate kingdom that invaded the Ming dynasty's imperial China. The Ming dynasty was the imperial dynasty of China that followed after the collapse of the Mongol-led Yuan dynasty.
2
@beyondrecall9446 >against the Western-instigated coup That's a FALSE narrative. Before Euromaidan, Russia started a trade war against Ukraine, that forced Yanukovych to sign a base rental extension agreement and which breached Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 which disallows foreign military bases after 2017. You missed the small detail with Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 that disallows foreign military bases after 2017. Read the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 which disallows foreign military bases after 2017. CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on 28 June 1996 Article 17 The location of foreign military bases shall not be permitted on the territory of Ukraine. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17. After 2017, Ukraine's constitution is incompatible with foreign military bases hosting either NATO or CSTO. If Yanukovych didn't sign the military base rental extension, Russia would be kicked out of Crimea. Putin's narrative is FALSE.
1
@Oliveir51 > sell their USD reserves massively From GPAS__2021 pdf Pension (mandated nanny state saving funds) vs GDP ratio for 2021 Five Eyes/Five Passport Group, Australia, $2,333 billion, 174.8% (CPTPP member, Nordic model), Australia's mandated large-scale savings started in the1980s under the Labor government. Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (CPTPP member, Nordic model) United Kingdom, $3,564 billion, 135.1% (near CPTPP member, Nordic model) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (I don't have data for NZ) Notice the Five Eyes group has similar pension assets to GDP ratio results Large-scale mandated savings funds enable the government to issue government bonds and large-scale bond buyer markets! EU Finland, $279 billion, 104.3% (Nordic model) France, $166 billion, 6.5% Germany, $548 billion, 14.5% Italy, $231 billion, 12.5% <----- PIIGS Netherlands, $1,900 billion, 214.4%, (Nordic model) Ireland, $197 billion, 49.4% <----- PIIGS Spain, $44 billion, 3.6% <----- PIIGS The EU lacks strategic savings coordination. Non-EU, Europe Switzerland, $1,163 billion, 164.3% (Nordic model) North America Mexico, $259 billion, 24.9% South America Brazil, $195 billion,14.3% Chile, $243 billion, 99.2% (CPTPP member) East Asia, South East Asia China, $285 billion, 1.9% Hong Kong, $199 billion, 58.3% Japan, $3,613 billion, 73.6% (CPTPP member) South Korea, $968 billion, 61.0% Malaysia, $279 billion, 83.0% (CPTPP member) South-Central Asia India, $184 billion, 7.1% Both India nor Russia are not in positioned to buy large-scale USD or invest in US government bonds.
1
@Oliveir51 For currency trading, Russia, India, and China have tough anti-foreigner protectionist investment policies, hence why would other countries invest in Russia's, India's, and China's currencies? From Trade Barrier Index (tariff score has less anti-foreigner protectionist investment policies) New Zealand's tariff score is 2.92 Australia's tariff score is 3.03 UK's tariff score is 3.94 Japan's tariff score is 4.05 US's tariff score is 4.54 Germany's tariff score is 4.88 (common with the EU's customs union) EU's tariff score is 4.88 Russia's tariff score is 6.16 China's tariff score is 6.8 India's tariff score is 8.1 Try again.
1