Comments by "Valen Ron" (@valenrn8657) on "Sky News Australia" channel.

  1. 249
  2. 215
  3. 212
  4. 170
  5. 162
  6. 123
  7. 113
  8. 111
  9. 110
  10. 109
  11. 98
  12. 98
  13. 95
  14. 82
  15. 75
  16. 68
  17. 68
  18. 63
  19. 59
  20. 58
  21. 57
  22. 56
  23. 50
  24. 50
  25. 49
  26. 48
  27. 45
  28. 44
  29. 43
  30. 43
  31. 43
  32. 41
  33. 37
  34. 37
  35. 36
  36. 33
  37. 33
  38. 31
  39. 31
  40. 29
  41. 29
  42. 29
  43. 28
  44. 27
  45. A French lawmaker raised questions in the country’s parliament in June about Australian concerns over delays, and whether Australia might be considering submarine alternatives, French government records show. Proving the French were aware of the cost overruns and the failure to complete the design on time had created issues with the Australians. After Australia had spent 2.5 billion dollars for no tangible results. The French asked for an extension nearly two years ago which would extend the design completion date from July 2022 to September 2023. Cost overruns, failure to deliver contractual obligations on time, hostility from the French whenever Australia tried to work out these issues with the French. 2.5 billion dollars and no finished design after five years. That is a cost overrun and all the French lies and tantrums don't change the facts. France failed to honour the contract with Australia. Macron is a lying brat, he should explain why the French have failed to deliver when all they were doing is modifying an existing design from nuclear propulsion to diesel-electric propulsion. After five years and 2.5 billion dollars they did not even finish the design let alone start building the first sub in France as specified by the contract, nor did they start building a shipyard in Adelaide as specified by the contract. Why Australian media is spinning this issue with the French as Australia's fault when the evidence is there for all to see says everything about the Australian media. Whether you love him or hate him, Morrison pull the plug on a scam, a scam that cost Australia 2.5 billion dollars and was only going to get worse, for a submarine that belongs back in the 20th century and does not meet Australia's defence needs in the 21st Century. ----- The Australian’s Editor at Large Paul Kelly is wrong.
    26
  46. 26
  47. 25
  48. 25
  49. 25
  50. 24
  51. 23
  52. 23
  53. 23
  54. 23
  55. 23
  56. 23
  57. 22
  58. 21
  59. 21
  60. 21
  61. 20
  62. 20
  63. 19
  64. 19
  65. 19
  66. 19
  67. 18
  68. 17
  69. 17
  70. 17
  71. 17
  72. 16
  73. 16
  74. 16
  75. 16
  76. 16
  77. 15
  78. 15
  79. 15
  80. 14
  81. 14
  82. 14
  83. 13
  84. 13
  85. 13
  86. 13
  87. 13
  88. 13
  89. 13
  90. 13
  91. 13
  92. 12
  93. 12
  94. 12
  95. 12
  96. 12
  97. 12
  98. 12
  99. 12
  100. 12
  101. 12
  102. 12
  103. 11
  104. 11
  105. 11
  106. 11
  107. Foreigners can not buy land in China. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited. --------------- China's protectionism is far higher than Australia's.
    11
  108. 11
  109. 11
  110. 10
  111. 10
  112. 10
  113.  @keepingcalm6469  US has its own interest. The United States remained Europe’s top supplier of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the first 3 months of 2021 as it continued to gain market share at the expense of Russia and Qatar, Europe’s second- and third-largest sources of LNG, according to the EU Commission’s latest European Gas Market Report. The US supplied 24% (4.2 Bcm) of the EU’s overall LNG imports (17 Bcm in Q1 2021); Russia placed second at 21% (3.7 Bcm); and Qatar was third at 18% (3.1 Bcm), the EU Commission reported in early July. When compared to Q4 2020, the US picked up 2% market share from January to March this year, while Russia bested Qatar to become Europe’s second-largest LNG supplier. Nigeria placed fourth, followed by Algeria and Trinidad and Tobago. A review of EU Commission reports dating back to 2019 reveals a steady quarter-to-quarter decline in Europe’s LNG purchases while it also documents the growing rivalry between the US and Russia, Qatar’s fall from dominance, and the emergence of the US as Europe’s top LNG supplier starting Q4 2019. The EU is the world’s third-largest LNG market, though its imports amounted to only about half that of Japan (36 Bcm) and China (32 Bcm) in Q1 2021. European gas consumption rose 7.6% to 132 Bcm in Q1 based on a year-on-year comparison. The commission noted that demand for gas as fuel to generate electricity rose 3.4%, also year-on-year (increasing by 4.9 TWh.) In terms of gas deliveries overall, including pipeline gas, Russia remained the leading gas supplier to Europe (45% of all imports) with the Nord Stream 1 pipeline across the Baltic Sea as its most important supply route.
    10
  114. 10
  115. 10
  116. 10
  117. 10
  118. 10
  119. 10
  120. 10
  121. 10
  122. 10
  123. 10
  124. 10
  125. 9
  126. 9
  127. 9
  128. 9
  129. 9
  130. 9
  131. 9
  132. 9
  133. 9
  134. 9
  135. 9
  136. 9
  137. 9
  138. 9
  139. 9
  140. 9
  141. 9
  142. 9
  143. 9
  144. 9
  145. 8
  146. 8
  147. 8
  148. 8
  149. 8
  150. 8
  151. 8
  152. 8
  153. 8
  154. 8
  155. 8
  156. 8
  157. 8
  158. 8
  159. 8
  160. 8
  161. 8
  162. 8
  163. 8
  164. 8
  165. 8
  166. 8
  167. 8
  168. 7
  169. 7
  170. 7
  171. 7
  172. 7
  173. 7
  174. 7
  175. 7
  176. 7
  177. 7
  178. 7
  179. 7
  180. 7
  181. 7
  182. 7
  183. 7
  184. 7
  185. 7
  186. 7
  187. 7
  188. 7
  189. 7
  190. 7
  191. 7
  192. 7
  193. 7
  194. 7
  195. 7
  196. 7
  197. 7
  198. 7
  199. 7
  200. 6
  201. 6
  202. 6
  203. 6
  204.  @ghostdog4330  Myth 1: NATO promised Russia it would not expand after the Cold War Fact: Such an agreement was never made. NATO’s door has been open to new members since it was founded in 1949 – and that has never changed. This “Open Door Policy” is enshrined in Article 10 of NATO’s founding treaty, which says “any other European State in a position to further the principles of this Treaty and to contribute to the security of the North Atlantic” can apply for membership. Decisions on membership are taken by consensus among all Allies. No treaty signed by the United States, Europe and Russia included provisions on NATO membership. The idea of NATO expansion beyond a united Germany was not on the agenda in 1989, particularly as the Warsaw Pact still existed. This was confirmed by Mikhail Gorbachev in an interview in 2014: "The topic of 'NATO expansion' was not discussed at all, and it wasn't brought up in those years. I say this with full responsibility. Not a single Eastern European country raised the issue, not even after the Warsaw Pact ceased to exist in 1991. Western leaders didn't bring it up, either." Declassified White House transcripts also reveal that, in 1997, Bill Clinton consistently refused Boris Yeltsin's offer of a 'gentlemen's agreement' that no former Soviet Republics would enter NATO: "I can't make commitments on behalf of NATO, and I'm not going to be in the position myself of vetoing NATO expansion with respect to any country, much less letting you or anyone else do so…NATO operates by consensus."
    6
  205. 6
  206. 6
  207. 6
  208. 6
  209. 6
  210. 6
  211. 6
  212. 6
  213. 6
  214. 6
  215. 6
  216. 6
  217. 6
  218. 6
  219. 6
  220. 6
  221. 6
  222. 6
  223. 6
  224. 6
  225. 6
  226. 6
  227. 6
  228. 6
  229. 6
  230. 6
  231. 6
  232. 6
  233. A French lawmaker raised questions in the country’s parliament in June about Australian concerns over delays, and whether Australia might be considering submarine alternatives, French government records show. Proving the French were aware of the cost overruns and the failure to complete the design on time had created issues with the Australians. After Australia had spent 2.5 billion dollars for no tangible results. The French asked for an extension nearly two years ago which would extend the design completion date from July 2022 to September 2023. Cost overruns, failure to deliver contractual obligations on time, hostility from the French whenever Australia tried to work out these issues with the French. 2.5 billion dollars and no finished design after five years. That is a cost overrun and all the French lies and tantrums don't change the facts. France failed to honour the contract with Australia. Macron is a lying brat, he should explain why the French have failed to deliver when all they were doing is modifying an existing design from nuclear propulsion to diesel-electric propulsion. After five years and 2.5 billion dollars they did not even finish the design let alone start building the first sub in France as specified by the contract, nor did they start building a shipyard in Adelaide as specified by the contract. Why Australian media is spinning this issue with the French as Australia's fault when the evidence is there for all to see says everything about the Australian media. Whether you love him or hate him, Morrison pull the plug on a scam, a scam that cost Australia 2.5 billion dollars and was only going to get worse, for a submarine that belongs back in the 20th century and does not meet Australia's defence needs in the 21st Century.
    6
  234. 6
  235. 6
  236. 6
  237. 6
  238. 6
  239. 6
  240. 6
  241. 6
  242. 6
  243. 6
  244. 6
  245. 6
  246. 6
  247. 6
  248. 5
  249. 5
  250. 5
  251. 5
  252. 5
  253. 5
  254. 5
  255. 5
  256. 5
  257. 5
  258. 5
  259. 5
  260. 5
  261. 5
  262. 5
  263. 5
  264. 5
  265. 5
  266. 5
  267. 5
  268. 5
  269. 5
  270. 5
  271. 5
  272. 5
  273. 5
  274. 5
  275. 5
  276. 5
  277. 5
  278. 5
  279. 5
  280. 5
  281. 5
  282. 5
  283. 5
  284. 5
  285. 5
  286. 5
  287. 5
  288. 5
  289. 5
  290. 5
  291. 5
  292. 5
  293. 5
  294. 5
  295. 5
  296. 5
  297. 5
  298. For Nigeria, Before British colonization, at the beginning of the 19th century, Usman dan Fodio led a successful jihad against the Hausa Kingdoms founding the centralised Sokoto Caliphate. The empire with Arabic as its official language grew rapidly under his rule and that of his descendants, who sent out invading armies in every direction. The vast landlocked empire connected the east with the western Sudan region and made inroads down south conquering parts of the Oyo Empire (modern-day Kwara), and advanced towards the Yoruba heartland of Ibadan, to reach the Atlantic Ocean. The territory controlled by the empire included much of modern-day northern and central Nigeria. The sultan sent out emirs to establish a suzerainty over the conquered territories and promote Islamic civilization, the emirs in turn became increasingly rich and powerful through trade and slavery. By the 1890s, the largest slave population in the world, about two million, was concentrated in the territories of the Sokoto Caliphate. The use of slave labour was extensive, especially in agriculture. In 1885, British claims to a West African sphere of influence received recognition from other European nations at the Berlin Conference. The following year, it chartered the Royal Niger Company under the leadership of Sir George Taubman Goldie. By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the company had vastly succeeded in subjugating the independent southern kingdoms along the Niger River, the British conquered Benin in 1897, and, in the Anglo-Aro War (1901–1902), defeated other opponents. The defeat of these states opened up the Niger area to British rule. In 1900, the company's territory came under the direct control of the British government and established the Southern Nigeria Protectorate as a British protectorate and part of the British Empire, the foremost world power at the time. Nigeria was independent since October 1st, 1960. ---- Starting from 1801, the Barbary Wars were a series of two wars fought by the United States, Sweden, and the Kingdom of Sicily against the Ottoman Empire's pro-slave traders Barbary states (including Tunis, Algiers, and Tripoli) of North Africa in the early 19th century. US's anti-slavery direction lead to the 1861 US civil war with Republican-governed anti-slavery USA vs Democrat-governed pro-slavery CSA.
    5
  299. 5
  300. 5
  301. 5
  302. 5
  303. 5
  304. 5
  305. 5
  306. 5
  307. 5
  308. 5
  309. 5
  310. 5
  311. 5
  312. 5
  313. 5
  314. 5
  315. 5
  316. 5
  317. 5
  318. 5
  319. 5
  320. 5
  321. 5
  322. 5
  323. 5
  324. 5
  325. 4
  326. 4
  327. 4
  328. 4
  329. 4
  330. 4
  331. 4
  332. 4
  333. 4
  334. 4
  335. 4
  336. 4
  337. 4
  338. 4
  339. 4
  340. 4
  341. 4
  342. 4
  343. 4
  344. 4
  345. 4
  346. 4
  347. 4
  348. 4
  349. 4
  350. 4
  351. 4
  352. 4
  353. 4
  354. 4
  355. 4
  356. 4
  357. 4
  358. 4
  359. 4
  360. 4
  361. 4
  362. 4
  363. 4
  364. 4
  365. 4
  366. 4
  367. 4
  368. 4
  369. Anthony Albanese's argument position is with France 1st. France has backed Italy’s decision to block COVID-19 vaccine exports to Australia. --- A French lawmaker raised questions in the country’s parliament in June about Australian concerns over delays, and whether Australia might be considering submarine alternatives, French government records show. Proving the French were aware of the cost overruns and the failure to complete the design on time had created issues with the Australians. After Australia had spent 2.5 billion dollars for no tangible results. The French asked for an extension nearly two years ago which would extend the design completion date from July 2022 to September 2023. Cost overruns, failure to deliver contractual obligations on time, hostility from the French whenever Australia tried to work out these issues with the French. 2.5 billion dollars and no finished design after five years. That is a cost overrun and all the French lies and tantrums don't change the facts. France failed to honour the contract with Australia. Macron is a lying brat, he should explain why the French have failed to deliver when all they were doing is modifying an existing design from nuclear propulsion to diesel-electric propulsion. After five years and 2.5 billion dollars they did not even finish the design let alone start building the first sub in France as specified by the contract, nor did they start building a shipyard in Adelaide as specified by the contract. Why Australian media is spinning this issue with the French as Australia's fault when the evidence is there for all to see says everything about the Australian media. Whether you love him or hate him, Morrison pull the plug on a scam, a scam that cost Australia 2.5 billion dollars and was only going to get worse, for a submarine that belongs back in the 20th century and does not meet Australia's defence needs in the 21st Century.
    4
  370. 4
  371. 4
  372. 4
  373.  @AbdullahKhan-dc3vi  Putin: “Speaking of security guarantees … our actions will not depend upon the negotiations, they will depend on the unconditional compliance with Russian security demands”. The main articles of Russian draft proposed agreement demand included eight articles with the following points: Article 1: the parties should not strengthen their security at the expense of Russia’s security; Article 2: the parties will use multilateral consultations and the NATO-Russia Council to address points of conflict; Article 3: the parties reaffirm that they do not consider each other as adversaries and maintain a dialogue; Article 4: the parties shall not deploy military forces and weaponry on the territory of any of the other states in Europe in addition to any forces that were deployed as of May 27, 1997; Article 5: the parties shall not deploy land-based intermediate- and short-range missiles adjacent to the other parties; Article 6: all member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization commit themselves to refrain from any further enlargement of NATO, including the accession of Ukraine as well as other States; Article 7: the parties that are member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization shall not conduct any military activity on the territory of Ukraine as well as other States in the Eastern Europe, in the South Caucasus and in Central Asia; and Article 8: the agreement shall not be interpreted as affecting the primary responsibility of the Security Council of the United Nations for maintaining international peace and security. ---- Fact: many eastern European countries (from the Three Seas Initiative) have major PTSD issues against Russia. Romania's government has condemned Putin's demand to remove Romania's freedom of association. Finland's government has condemned Putin's demand to remove Finland's freedom of association. Estonia's government has condemned Putin's demand to remove Estonia's freedom of association. Latvia's government has condemned Putin's demand to remove Latvia's freedom of association. Lithuania's government has condemned Putin's demand to remove Lithuania's freedom of association. Poland's government has condemned Putin's demand to remove Poland's freedom of association. Bulgaria's government has condemned Putin's demand to remove Bulgaria's freedom of association. Sweden's government has condemned Putin's demand to remove Sweden's freedom of association. Against Russian demands, Swedish Foreign Minister Ann Linde: "The Swedish security policy is determined by Sweden. Russia has nothing to do with our independent decisions”. There's nothing noble about territorial grabbing from another country like an "old school" European imperialist.
    4
  374. 4
  375. 4
  376. 4
  377. 4
  378. 4
  379. 4
  380. 4
  381. 4
  382. 4
  383. 4
  384. 4
  385. 4
  386. 4
  387. 4
  388. 4
  389. 4
  390. 4
  391. 4
  392. 4
  393. 4
  394. 4
  395. 4
  396. 4
  397. 4
  398. 4
  399. 4
  400. 4
  401. 4
  402. 4
  403. 4
  404. 4
  405. 4
  406. 4
  407. 4
  408. 4
  409. 4
  410. 4
  411. 4
  412. 4
  413. 4
  414. 4
  415. 4
  416. 4
  417. 4
  418. 4
  419. 4
  420. 4
  421. 4
  422. 4
  423. 4
  424. 4
  425. 4
  426. 4
  427. 3
  428. 3
  429. 3
  430. 3
  431.  @seventhuser904  That's a false equivalence. Unlike Russia, the US did NOT assimilate Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, and Yugoslavia into US federal structure. >Yugoslavia 9 February 1994: At UN request, NATO agreed to authorise air strikes, declared 20 km total exclusion zone around Sarajevo and required Bosnian Serbs to withdraw heavy weapons from zone or place them under UN control within 10 days; also called on Bosnian Government to place heavy weapons in Sarajevo under UN control. Agreement between 'RS' and Bosnian Government to a ceasefire in Sarajevo, negotiated by Lieutenant-General Sir Michael Rose, then Commander of UN forces in Bosnia. UN Security Council through UNSCR 836 of 4 June 1994 authorizes the use of air power to defend the safe areas created by UN Security Council resolution 824 of 6 May 1993. Paragraph 10 of UNSCR 836 stipulates: "...Member States, acting nationally or through regional organisations or arrangements, may take, under the authority of the Security Council and subject to close coordination with the Secretary-General and UNPROFOR, all necessary measures, through the use of air power, in and around the safe areas in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, to support UNPROFOR in the performance of its mandate..." >Libya NATO STOPPED the bloody civil war in Libya. Putin STARTED the bloody war in Ukraine. On 16 August 2003, Libya formally admitted responsibility for Pan Am Flight 103 (Lockabie bombing) in a letter presented to the president of the United Nations Security Council. "On 10 March 2011, France was the first country in the world to recognise the National Transitional Council as the legitimate government of Libya". United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 was adopted by the United Nations Security Council on 17 March 2011 in response to the First Libyan Civil War. The Security Council resolution was proposed by France, Lebanon, and the United Kingdom. Muammar Gaddafi played stupid games and win stupid prizes. The US supported France(EU)'s and UK(EU)'s, and Lebanon's United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973. NATO wasn't used until United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 since it was vetoed by Turkey. If, however, you are referring to the NATO intervention in Libya, that was NATO agreeing to enforce a United Nations Security Council Resolution. It was never intended as a permanent expansion of the Alliance to embrace Libya nor to establish a NATO base in the country.
    3
  432. 3
  433. 3
  434. 3
  435. 3
  436. 3
  437. 3
  438. 3
  439. 3
  440. 3
  441. 3
  442. 3
  443. 3
  444. 3
  445. 3
  446. 3
  447. 3
  448. 3
  449. 3
  450. 3
  451. 3
  452. 3
  453. 3
  454. 3
  455. 3
  456. 3
  457. 3
  458. 3
  459. 3
  460. 3
  461. 3
  462. 3
  463. 3
  464. 3
  465. 3
  466. 3
  467. 3
  468. 3
  469. 3
  470. 3
  471. 3
  472. 3
  473. 3
  474. 3
  475. 3
  476. 3
  477. 3
  478. 3
  479. 3
  480. 3
  481. 3
  482. 3
  483. 3
  484. 3
  485. 3
  486. 3
  487. 3
  488. 3
  489. 3
  490. 3
  491. 3
  492. 3
  493. 3
  494. 3
  495. 3
  496. 3
  497. 3
  498. 3
  499. 3
  500. 3
  501. 3
  502. 3
  503. 3
  504. 3
  505. 3
  506. 3
  507. 3
  508. 3
  509. 3
  510. 3
  511. 3
  512. 3
  513. 3
  514. 3
  515. 3
  516. 3
  517. 3
  518. 3
  519. 3
  520. 3
  521. 3
  522.  @TjJay-ev6mx  Syria A Jewish wedding in Aleppo, Syria (Ottoman Empire), 1914. Ruins of the Central Synagogue of Aleppo after the 1947 Aleppo pogrom In 1947, rioters in Aleppo burned the city's Jewish quarter and killed 75 people.[191] As a result, nearly half of the Jewish population of Aleppo opted to leave the city,[5] initially to neighbouring Lebanon.[192] In 1948, there were approximately 30,000 Jews in Syria. In 1949, following defeat in the Arab–Israeli War, the CIA-backed March 1949 Syrian coup d'état installed Husni al-Za'im as the President of Syria. Za'im permitted the emigration of large numbers of Syrian Jews, and 5,000 left to Israel.[192] The subsequent Syrian governments placed severe restrictions on the Jewish community, including barring emigration.[192] In 1948, the government banned the sale of Jewish property and in 1953 all Jewish bank accounts were frozen. The Syrian secret police closely monitored the Jewish community. Over the following years, many Jews managed to escape, and the work of supporters, particularly Judy Feld Carr,[193] in smuggling Jews out of Syria, and bringing their plight to the attention of the world, raised awareness of their situation. Although the Syrian government attempted to stop Syrian Jews from exporting their assets, the American consulate in Damascus noted in 1950 that "the majority of Syrian Jews have managed to dispose of their property and to emigrate to Lebanon, Italy, and Israel".[194][195] In November 1954, the Syrian government temporarily lifted its ban on Jewish emigration.[196] The various restrictions that the Syrian government placed on the Jewish population were severe. Jews were legally barred from working for the government or for banks, obtaining driver's licenses, having telephones in their homes or business premises, or purchasing property. In March 1964, the Syrian government issued a decree prohibiting Jews from traveling more than three miles from the limits of their hometowns.[197] In 1967, in the aftermath of the Six-Day War, antisemitic riots broke out in Damascus and Aleppo. Jews were allowed to leave their homes only for few hours daily. Many Jews found it impossible to pursue their business ventures because the larger community was boycotting their products. In 1970, Israel launched Operation Blanket, a covert military and intelligence operation to evacuate Syrian Jews, managing to bring a few dozen young Jews to Israel.[198] Clandestine Jewish emigration continued, as Jews attempted to sneak across the borders into Lebanon or Turkey, often with the help of smugglers, and make contact with Israeli agents or local Jewish communities. In 1972, demonstrations were held by 1,000 Syrian Jews in Damascus, after four Jewish women were killed as they attempted to flee Syria. The protest surprised Syrian authorities, who closely monitored Jewish community, eavesdropped on their telephone conversations, and tampered with their mail.[198] Following the Madrid Conference of 1991, the United States put pressure on the Syrian government to ease its restrictions on Jews, and during Passover in 1992, the government of Syria began granting exit visas to Jews on condition that they did not emigrate to Israel. At that time, the country had several thousand Jews. The majority left for the United States—most to join the large Syrian Jewish community in South Brooklyn, New York—although some went to France and Turkey, and 1,262 Syrian Jews who wanted to immigrate to Israel were brought there in a two-year covert operation.[199] In 2004, the Syrian government attempted to establish better relations with its emigrants, and a delegation of a dozen Jews of Syrian origin visited Syria in the spring of that year.[199] As of December 2014, only 17 Jews remain in Syria, according to Rabbi Avraham Hamra; nine men and eight women, all over 60 years of age.[200] ------------- Your argument is bullshit.
    3
  523. 3
  524. 3
  525. 3
  526. 3
  527. 3
  528. 3
  529. 3
  530. 3
  531. 3
  532. 3
  533. 3
  534. 3
  535. 3
  536. 3
  537. 3
  538. 3
  539. 3
  540. 3
  541. 3
  542. 3
  543. 3
  544. 3
  545. 3
  546. In the mid-2000s, Colombo (the commercial capital of Sri Lanka) agreed to let Beijing build a new port from scratch in the town of Hambantota, in the south of the island. It wasn’t yet thought of as part of a new Silk Road -- that programme was conceptualizsed by Xi Jinping in 2012 -- but all the ingredients were there. "Chinese funds and engineers are mobilised to build infrastructure outside China, as part of a partnership that was meant to be win-win: this is the very definition of the rationale of the Silk Road," said Jean-François Dufour, economist and director of DCA China-Analysis. The Chinese president integrated the Sri Lankan project into his Silk Road initiative in 2013. But in 2015, financial clouds began gathering over the future of Hambantota’s port, which cost $1.1 billion. Sri Lanka was crumbling under the debt, and was unable to repay the more than $8 billion in loans it had taken from China for several infrastructure projects in the country. Furious, Beijing turned up the heat and threatened to cut off financial support to the island nation if it didn’t quickly find a solution. In December, 2017, after two years of negotiations, Colombo finally agreed to turn over the port to China for 99 years in exchange for the cancellation of its debt. The concession was humiliating for Sri Lanka, while "the opponents of China, like India, painted the entire operation as a deliberate plan to acquire strategic positions in the region," Dufour said. China was suspected of intentionally strangling Colombo with loans at a 6 percent interest rate, which was much higher than the other lenders - such as the World Bank – from which Colombo had previously borrowed.
    3
  547. 3
  548. 3
  549. 3
  550. 3
  551. 3
  552. 3
  553. 3
  554. 3
  555. 3
  556. 3
  557. 3
  558. 3
  559.  @JohnGeometresMaximos  Report: Saudi Arabia Presses U.S. on Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Date: January 19, 1992 From AP NEWS NEW YORK (AP) _ Saudi Arabia is pressuring the Bush administration to secretly arm and give intelligence to Iraqi opposition forces so they can work to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a newspaper reported Sunday. The Saudis want the United States to give arms and intelligence to Kurdish rebels in north Iraq, Shiite Muslim fighters in the south and Sunni Muslim opposition forces in central Iraq, the Times said, quoting U.S. and allied officials it didn’t name. ------ Date: December 2005 Dutch dealer gets 15 years for chemical sales to Saddam. A Dutch businessman was yesterday jailed for 15 years after a court in The Hague found him guilty of complicity in war crimes for selling chemicals to Iraq that Saddam Hussein's regime used in lethal gas attacks on Kurdish villages. ------ Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq Try again.
    3
  560. 3
  561. 3
  562. 3
  563. 3
  564. 3
  565. 3
  566. 3
  567. 3
  568. 3
  569. 3
  570. 3
  571. 3
  572. 3
  573. 3
  574. 3
  575. 3
  576.  @mechatronica8417  CCP is indeed hypocrites. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    3
  577. 3
  578. 3
  579. 3
  580. 3
  581. 3
  582.  @robertmarmaduke9721  False narrative By the 16th century, increasing numbers of Chinese fishermen, traders and pirates were visiting the southwestern part of the island. When the Dutch arrived in 1623, they found about 1,500 Chinese visitors and residents. The Dutch East India Company (VOC) came to the area in search of an Asian trade and military base. Defeated by the Portuguese at the Battle of Macau in 1622, they attempted to occupy Penghu, but were driven off by the Ming authorities. They then built Fort Zeelandia on the islet of Tayowan off the southwest coast of Taiwan. (The site is now part of the main island, in modern Anping, Tainan.) On the adjacent mainland, they built a smaller brick fort, Fort Provintia.[22] Local aboriginals called the area Pakan[23] and on some old maps the island of Taiwan is named Pakan.[24] In 1626, the Spanish Empire, viewing the Dutch presence on Taiwan as a threat to their colony in the Philippines, established a settlement at Santísima Trinidad on the northeast coast of Taiwan (modern Keelung), building Fort San Salvador. They also built Fort Santo Domingo in the northwest (modern Tamsui) in 1629, but had abandoned it by 1638. The small colony was plagued by disease and a hostile local population, and received little support from Manila.[25] The Dutch Governor Pieter Nuyts got entangled in a dispute with the Japanese Hamada Yahei. The Dutch were defeated at the Battle of Liaoluo Bay by the Chinese Zheng Zhilong in 1633. The Dutch set out to turn Taiwan into a Dutch colony.[11] The first order of business was to punish villages that had violently opposed the Dutch and unite the aborigines in allegiance with the VOC. The first punitive expedition was against the villages of Baccloan and Mattauw, north of Saccam near Tayowan. The Mattauw campaign had been easier than expected and the tribe submitted after having their village razed by fire. The campaign also served as a threat to other villages from Tirossen (modern Chiayi) to Lonkjiaow (Hengchun). The 1636 punitive attack on Lamay Island in response to the killing of the shipwrecked crews of the Beverwijck and the Golden Lion ended ten years later with the entire aboriginal population of 1100 removed from the island including 327 Lamayans killed in a cave, having been trapped there by the Dutch and suffocated in the fumes and smoke pumped into the cave by the Dutch and their allied aborigines from Saccam, Soulang and Pangsoya.[26] The men were forced into slavery in Batavia (Java) and the women and children became servants and wives for the Dutch officers. The events on Lamay changed the course of Dutch rule to work closer with allied aborigines, though there remained plans to depopulate the outlying islands.[27] In 1642, the Dutch ejected the Spanish from the north of the island.[28][29] They then sought to establish control of the western plains between the new possessions and their base at Taoyuan. After a brief but destructive campaign in 1645, Pieter Boon was able to subdue the tribes in this area, including the Kingdom of Middag.[30][31] On the mainland, Manchu forces broke through Shanhai Pass in 1644 and rapidly overwhelmed the Ming dynasty. In 1661, a naval fleet led by the Ming loyalist Koxinga arrived in Taiwan to oust the Dutch from Zeelandia and establish a pro-Ming base in Taiwan.[36] Koxinga was born to Zheng Zhilong, a Chinese merchant and pirate, and Tagawa Matsu, a Japanese woman, in 1624 in Hirado, Nagasaki Prefecture, Japan. He was raised there until seven and moved to Quanzhou, in the Fujian province of China. In a family made wealthy from shipping and piracy, Koxinga inherited his father's trade networks, which stretched from Nagasaki to Macao. Following the Manchu advance on Fujian, Koxinga retreated from his stronghold in Amoy (Xiamen city) and besieged Taiwan in the hope of establishing a strategic base to marshal his troops to retake his base at Amoy. In 1662, following a nine-month siege, Koxinga captured the Dutch fortress Zeelandia and Taiwan became his base (see Kingdom of Tungning).[37] The Taiwanese Aboriginal tribes who were previously allied with the Dutch against the Chinese during the Guo Huaiyi Rebellion in 1652 turned against the Dutch during the Siege of Fort Zeelandia and defected to Koxinga's Chinese forces.[38] The Aboriginals (Formosans) of Sincan defected to Koxinga after he offered them amnesty. The Sincan Aboriginals then proceeded to work for the Chinese and behead Dutch people in executions. The frontier aboriginals in the mountains and plains also surrendered and defected to the Chinese on 17 May 1661, celebrating their freedom from compulsory education under the Dutch rule by hunting down Dutch people and beheading them and trashing their Christian school textbooks.[39] Koxinga died four months after the siege was over, there were speculations that he died in a sudden fit of madness when his officers refused to carry out his orders to execute his son Zheng Jing. Zheng Jing had an affair with his wet nurse and conceived a child with her.[40] Other accounts are more straightforward, attributing Koxinga's death to a case of malaria.[41][42] Following the death of Koxinga, his son Zheng Jing took over the Zheng regime, leading the remaining 7,000 Ming loyalist troops to Taiwan. In response to raids by Zheng Jing and in an effort to starve out the forces in Taiwan, the Qing decreed to relocate all of the southern coastal towns and ports that had been the targets of raids by the Zheng fleet and thus provided supplies for the resistance. This measure largely backfired, and between 1662 and 1664, six major waves of immigration occurred from these coastal towns to Taiwan, spurred by the severe hardships incurred from the Qing relocation policy. In a move to take advantage of this Qing misstep, Zheng Jing promoted immigration to Taiwan by promising free eastern land cultivation and ownership for peasants in exchange for compulsory military service by all males in case the island was in danger of a Qing invasion. ... From 1683, the Qing dynasty ruled part of the island as Taiwan Prefecture and in 1875 divided the island into two prefectures, north and south. In 1887, the island was declared as a separate Fokien-Taiwan Province. The Qing authorities tried to limit immigration to Taiwan and barred families from traveling to Taiwan to ensure the immigrants would return to their families and ancestral graves. Illegal immigration continued, but many of the men had few prospects in war-weary Fujian and thus married locally, resulting in the idiom "has Tangshan[a] father, no Tangshan mother" The Qing tried to protect aboriginal land claims, but also sought to turn them into tax-paying subjects. Chinese and tax-paying aborigines were barred from entering the wilderness which covered most of the island for the fear of raising the ire of the nontaxpaying, highland aborigines and inciting rebellion. A border was constructed along the western plain, built using pits and mounds of earth, called "earth cows", to discourage squatting. ----- In the 1600s, Imperial China didn't control Taiwan. Dutch Taiwan was a refugee Island for Ming loyalists against Qing (ruling Imperial China).
    3
  583. 3
  584. 3
  585. 3
  586. 3
  587. 3
  588. 3
  589. 3
  590. 3
  591. 3
  592. 3
  593. 3
  594. 3
  595. 3
  596. 3
  597. 3
  598. 3
  599. 3
  600. 3
  601. 3
  602. 3
  603. 3
  604. 3
  605. 3
  606. 3
  607. 3
  608. 3
  609. 3
  610. 3
  611. 3
  612. 3
  613. 3
  614. 3
  615. 3
  616. 3
  617. 3
  618. 3
  619. 3
  620. 3
  621. 3
  622. 2
  623. 2
  624. 2
  625. 2
  626. 2
  627. 2
  628. 2
  629. 2
  630. 2
  631. 2
  632.  @johnlo5687  Wrong with "business is business". http://archive.is/vNDW0 China’s protectionism comes home to roost. Archived copy article from ft.com https://graphitepublications.com/will-chinas-outrageous-rare-earth-monopoly-persist/ China's rare earth near-monopoly was built on SOE (state-own enterprise) which driven private competitors from the market. Rare earth is important for electronics component production logistics chain. https://www.forbes.com/sites/douglasbulloch/2016/10/12/protectionism-may-be-rising-around-the-world-but-in-china-it-never-went-away/#5dc3f5df73da Protectionism May Be Rising Around The World, But In China It Never Went Away https://www.afr.com/brand/chanticleer/chinese-tech-stocks-pose-an-investment-dilemma-20180815-h1410o Baidu became China's No.1 search engine partly because Google was outlawed. Tencent became the world's largest gaming company and owner of China's No.1 messaging system without needing to compete with Facebook's WhatsApp. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/20/business/economy/china-us-trade-tariffs.html For example, an American car going to China pays 25% import duty, but a Chinese car coming to the US only pays 2.5%, a tenfold difference. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 8, 2018 From Musk's March 8th, 2018, China already has 25 percent import duty on US made cars before Trump's response. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2018/07/12/reciprocity_is_the_method_to_trumps_madness_137496.html Reciprocity Is the Method to Trump's Madness Trump wanted trade reciprocity against China! If Trump executes His trade reciprocity against China, there would be two "Chinese characteristics" protectionist nations clashing with each other. EU is no better with its protectionist policies e.g. the gap between hard Brexit vs being an EU member state.
    2
  633. 2
  634. 2
  635. 2
  636. 2
  637. 2
  638. 2
  639. 2
  640. 2
  641. 2
  642. 2
  643. 2
  644. 2
  645. 2
  646. 2
  647. 2
  648. 2
  649. 2
  650. 2
  651. 2
  652. 2
  653. 2
  654. 2
  655. 2
  656. 2
  657. 2
  658. 2
  659. 2
  660. 2
  661. 2
  662. 2
  663. 2
  664. 2
  665. 2
  666. 2
  667. 2
  668. 2
  669. 2
  670. 2
  671. 2
  672. 2
  673. 2
  674. 2
  675. 2
  676. 2
  677. 2
  678. 2
  679. 2
  680. 2
  681. 2
  682. 2
  683. 2
  684. 2
  685. 2
  686. 2
  687. 2
  688. 2
  689. 2
  690. 2
  691. 2
  692. 2
  693. 2
  694. France has backed Italy’s decision to block COVID-19 vaccine exports to Australia. France has shown its bias towards Italy ahead of Australia. -------------------- A French lawmaker raised questions in the country’s parliament in June about Australian concerns over delays, and whether Australia might be considering submarine alternatives, French government records show. Proving the French were aware of the cost overruns and the failure to complete the design on time had created issues with the Australians. After Australia had spent 2.5 billion dollars for no tangible results. The French asked for an extension nearly two years ago which would extend the design completion date from July 2022 to September 2023. Cost overruns, failure to deliver contractual obligations on time, hostility from the French whenever Australia tried to work out these issues with the French. 2.5 billion dollars and no finished design after five years. That is a cost overrun and all the French lies and tantrums don't change the facts. France failed to honour the contract with Australia. Macron is a lying brat, he should explain why the French have failed to deliver when all they were doing is modifying an existing design from nuclear propulsion to diesel-electric propulsion. After five years and 2.5 billion dollars they did not even finish the design let alone start building the first sub in France as specified by the contract, nor did they start building a shipyard in Adelaide as specified by the contract. Why Australian media is spinning this issue with the French as Australia's fault when the evidence is there for all to see says everything about the Australian media. Whether you love him or hate him, Morrison pull the plug on a scam, a scam that cost Australia 2.5 billion dollars and was only going to get worse, for a submarine that belongs back in the 20th century and does not meet Australia's defence needs in the 21st Century.
    2
  695. 2
  696. 2
  697. 2
  698. 2
  699. 2
  700. 2
  701. 2
  702. 2
  703. 2
  704. 2
  705. 2
  706. 2
  707. 2
  708. 2
  709. 2
  710. 2
  711. 2
  712. 2
  713. 2
  714. 2
  715. 2
  716. 2
  717. 2
  718. 2
  719. 2
  720. 2
  721. 2
  722. 2
  723. 2
  724. 2
  725. 2
  726. 2
  727. 2
  728. 2
  729. 2
  730. 2
  731. 2
  732. 2
  733. 2
  734. 2
  735. 2
  736. 2
  737. 2
  738. 2
  739. 2
  740. 2
  741. 2
  742. 2
  743. 2
  744. 2
  745. 2
  746. 2
  747. 2
  748. 2
  749. 2
  750. 2
  751. 2
  752. 2
  753. 2
  754. 2
  755. 2
  756. 2
  757. 2
  758. 2
  759. 2
  760. 2
  761. 2
  762. 2
  763. 2
  764. 2
  765. 2
  766. 2
  767. 2
  768.  @edwinbronfield8928  International trade with free-market idealogy wouldn't work when there's a large participant with large-scale government support and SOEs. From graphitepublications.com/will-chinas-outrageous-rare-earth-monopoly-persist/ China's rare earth near-monopoly was built on SOE (state-own enterprise) which driven private competitors from the market. Rare earth is important for the electronics component production logistics chain. From forbes.com/sites/douglasbulloch/2016/10/12/protectionism-may-be-rising-around-the-world-but-in-china-it-never-went-away/#5dc3f5df73da Protectionism May Be Rising Around The World, But In China It Never Went Away Promises unkept? Since joining the WTO in 2001, China has repeatedly insisted that it will live up to those undertakings made on entry. In particular, the use of currency manipulation has been identified by the US as a breech of the commitment to end price controls for the purposes of protecting domestic industries. This became a major political issue from 2005 onwards, and has only recently subsided because it is assumed that the RMB is slightly overvalued on the market. Nevertheless, for years it was deliberate policy for the PBoC to accumulate US Dollars and suppress the exchange rate for the RMB, resulting in exactly the price distortions China had committed to eliminate in 2001, and fuelling an enormous trade surplus with the US, which persists and expands to this day. Furthermore TRIPS implementation has been given some effect on paper, but has made little progress when it comes to 'enforcement.' This is (according to the WTO) as recently as February 2015, fully 14 years after TRIPS was supposed to be already in effect. The US Trade Representative produces an annual report to Congress on China's WTO compliance which leaves little room to conclude they have so far lived up to their accession commitments. The most recent several-hundred-page document - produced in December 2015 - recites a long list of small measures, committees established, announcements made and new administrative complications faced, all continuing disputes over an agreement theoretically in effect since 2001. Although, therefore, protectionism is rising around the world, it is also true to say that existing practices of protectionism have not fallen in the way that they should have since China's accession to the WTO in 2001. Because of this lack of progress in easing trade, the extended period of currency manipulation, the lack of observance of TRIPS and the sheer administrative resistance exporters face when trying to get their products into China, we now face of world of highly unbalanced trade, and rising mistrust. And it is this that is leading to rising protectionism; the simple fact that it never went away. --------------- Note that Australia created its universal health care system without the Communist-style mass stealing i.e. built a parallel system to the private health care system. Australia's universal health care system does not compete in international trade.
    2
  769. 2
  770. 2
  771. 2
  772. 2
  773. 2
  774. 2
  775. 2
  776. 2
  777. 2
  778. 2
  779. 2
  780. 2
  781. 2
  782. 2
  783. 2
  784. 2
  785. 2
  786. 2
  787. 2
  788. 2
  789. 2
  790. 2
  791. 2
  792. 2
  793. 2
  794. 2
  795. 2
  796. 2
  797. 2
  798. 2
  799. 2
  800. 2
  801. 2
  802. 2
  803. 2
  804. 2
  805. 2
  806. 2
  807. 2
  808. 2
  809. 2
  810. 2
  811. 2
  812. 2
  813. 2
  814. 2
  815. 2
  816. 2
  817. 2
  818. 2
  819. 2
  820. 2
  821. 2
  822. 2
  823. There's a difference between annual profit-and-loss vs accumulated liabilities in a balance sheet. From GPAS__2021 pdf Pension (mandated nanny state saving funds) vs GDP ratio for 2021 Five Eyes/Five Passport Group, Australia, $2,333 billion, 174.8% (CPTPP member, Nordic model), Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (USMCA, CPTPP member, Nordic model) United Kingdom, $3,564 billion, 135.1% (near CPTPP member, Nordic model) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% Notice the Five Eyes group has similar pension assets to GDP ratio results Large-scale mandated savings funds enable the government to issue government bonds and large-scale bond buyer markets! EU Finland, $279 billion, 104.3% (Nordic model) France, $166 billion, 6.5% Germany, $548 billion, 14.5% Italy, $231 billion, 12.5% <----- PIIGS Netherlands, $1,900 billion, 214.4%, (Nordic model) Ireland, $197 billion, 49.4% <----- PIIGS Spain, $44 billion, 3.6% <----- PIIGS The EU lacks strategic savings coordination. Non-EU, Europe Switzerland, $1,163 billion, 164.3% (Nordic model) North America United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (USMCA member) Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (USMCA, CPTPP member, Nordic model) Mexico, $259 billion, 24.9% (USMCA, CPTPP member) South America Brazil, $195 billion,14.3% Chile, $243 billion, 99.2% (CPTPP member) East Asia, South East Asia China, $285 billion, 1.9% Hong Kong, $199 billion, 58.3% Japan, $3,613 billion, 73.6% (CPTPP member) South Korea, $968 billion, 61.0% Malaysia, $279 billion, 83.0% (CPTPP member) South-Central Asia India, $184 billion, 7.1%
    2
  824. 2
  825. 2
  826. 2
  827. 2
  828. 2
  829. 2
  830. 2
  831. 2
  832. 2
  833. 2
  834. 2
  835. 2
  836. 2
  837. 2
  838. 2
  839. 2
  840. 2
  841. 2
  842. 2
  843. 2
  844. 2
  845. 2
  846. 2
  847. 2
  848. 2
  849. 2
  850. 2
  851. 2
  852. 2
  853. 2
  854. 2
  855. 2
  856. 2
  857. 2
  858. 2
  859. 2
  860. 2
  861. 2
  862. 2
  863. 2
  864. 2
  865. 2
  866. 2
  867. 2
  868. 2
  869. 2
  870. 2
  871. 2
  872. 2
  873. 2
  874. 2
  875. 2
  876. 2
  877. 2
  878. 2
  879. 2
  880. 2
  881. 2
  882. 2
  883. 2
  884. 2
  885. 2
  886. 2
  887. 2
  888. 2
  889. 2
  890. 2
  891. 2
  892. 2
  893. 2
  894. 2
  895. 2
  896. 2
  897. 2
  898. 2
  899. 2
  900. 2
  901. 2
  902. Before Euromaidan, Russia started a trade war against Ukraine, forcing Yanukovych to sign a base rental extension agreement that breached Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 disallows foreign military bases after 2017. Read the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 which disallows foreign military bases after 2017. CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on 28 June 1996 Article 17 The location of foreign military bases shall not be permitted on the territory of Ukraine. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17. After 2017, Ukraine's constitution is incompatible with foreign military bases hosting either NATO or CSTO. If Yanukovych didn't sign the military base rental extension, Russia would be kicked out of Crimea. Putin's narrative is FALSE. Putin's pressure caused Yanukovych to make a mistake. --- Every country has the right to operate a biolab and Ukraine did NOT invade another country. Basic pathology blood test requires a bio lab. Saddam's Iraq invaded two other countries i.e. Kuwait and Iran. Remember, Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum exchanged Ukraine's nuclear WMD for security assurances from US, UK, and Russia. France and China signed a watered-down Budapest Memorandum. Budapest Memorandum requires Ukraine to join Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty as part of Ukraine's nuclear WMD disarmament. Tucker is ignorant of Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum. Did you know Australia has similar security assurances like Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum and Australia does NOT have a NATO Article V level guarantee with the US? From 1950 to the 1960s, Australia detonated nuclear bombs as a joint partner with the UK. Australia has many Biolabs for agriculture, animal health, human health and 'etc'.
    2
  903. 2
  904. 2
  905. 2
  906. 2
  907. 2
  908. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    2
  909. 2
  910. 2
  911. 2
  912. 2
  913. 2
  914. 2
  915. 2
  916. 2
  917. 2
  918. 2
  919. 2
  920. 2
  921. 2
  922. 2
  923. 2
  924. 2
  925. 2
  926. 2
  927. 2
  928. 2
  929. 2
  930. 2
  931. 2
  932. 2
  933. 2
  934. 2
  935. 2
  936. 2
  937. 2
  938. 2
  939. 2
  940. 2
  941. 2
  942. 2
  943. 2
  944. 2
  945. 2
  946. 2
  947. 2
  948. 2
  949. 2
  950. 2
  951. 2
  952. 2
  953. 2
  954. 2
  955. 2
  956. 2
  957. 2
  958. 2
  959. 2
  960. 2
  961. 2
  962. 2
  963. 2
  964. 2
  965. 2
  966. 2
  967. 2
  968. 2
  969. 2
  970. 2
  971. 2
  972. 2
  973. 2
  974. 2
  975. 2
  976. 2
  977. 2
  978. 2
  979. 2
  980. 2
  981. 2
  982. 2
  983. 2
  984. 2
  985.  @robertmarmaduke9721  False. The government of the Republic of China, led by the Kuomintang, retreated to Taiwan Island in 1949 after losing the Chinese Civil War with the Communist Party of China. At that time, the Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of Communist Rebellion was enforced and largely restricted civil and political rights including voting rights of the Taiwanese people. In the eight elections starting from the 1948 Republic of China presidential election in Nanking (later known as Nanjing) to the 1990 Taiwan presidential election, the President was indirectly elected by the National Assembly first elected in 1947 and which had never been reelected in its entirety since. Similarly, the Legislative Yuan also had not been reelected as a whole since 1948. The provincial Governor and municipal Mayors were appointed by the central government. Direct elections were only held for local governments at the county level, and for legislators at the provincial level. In addition, the Martial law in Taiwan also prohibited most forms of opposition. From the 1990s, a series of democratic reforms were implemented in Taiwan. The Additional Articles of the Constitution were adopted to grant full civil and political rights to the Taiwanese people (officially the people of the Free area of the Republic of China). Under the Additional Articles, the President are to be elected by popular vote and all seats in the national parliament are to be reelected. Following the reforms, the first parliamentary elections on Taiwan were held in 1991 for the National Assembly and 1992 for the Legislative Yuan. The first election for provincial Governors and municipality Mayors was held in 1994. Most importantly, Taiwan held the first direct election of the President and Vice President in 1996. The provincial government was reconstructed as a subsidiary of the central government in 1998 and elections for governor and provincial legislators were terminated. The National Assembly ceased to be convened regularly in 2000 and was abolished in 2005. The number of members of the Legislative Yuan was reduced to 113 from 2008.
    2
  986. 2
  987. 2
  988. 2
  989. 2
  990. 2
  991. 2
  992. 2
  993. 2
  994. 2
  995. 2
  996. 2
  997. 2
  998. 2
  999. 2
  1000. 2
  1001. 2
  1002. 2
  1003. 2
  1004. 2
  1005. 2
  1006. 2
  1007. 2
  1008. 2
  1009. 2
  1010. 2
  1011. 2
  1012. 2
  1013. 2
  1014. 2
  1015. 2
  1016. 2
  1017. 2
  1018. 2
  1019. 2
  1020. 2
  1021. 2
  1022. 2
  1023. 2
  1024. 2
  1025. 2
  1026. 2
  1027. 2
  1028. 2
  1029. 2
  1030. 2
  1031. 2
  1032. 2
  1033. 2
  1034. 2
  1035. 2
  1036. 2
  1037. 2
  1038. 2
  1039. 2
  1040. 2
  1041. 2
  1042. 2
  1043. 2
  1044. 2
  1045. 2
  1046. 2
  1047. 2
  1048. 2
  1049. 2
  1050. 2
  1051. 2
  1052. 2
  1053. 2
  1054. 2
  1055. 2
  1056. 2
  1057. 2
  1058. 2
  1059. 2
  1060. 2
  1061. 2
  1062. 2
  1063. 2
  1064. 2
  1065. 2
  1066. 2
  1067. 2
  1068. 2
  1069. 2
  1070. 2
  1071. 2
  1072. 2
  1073. 2
  1074. 2
  1075. 2
  1076. 2
  1077. 2
  1078. 2
  1079. 2
  1080. 2
  1081. 2
  1082. 2
  1083. 2
  1084. 2
  1085. 2
  1086. 2
  1087. 2
  1088. 2
  1089. 2
  1090. 2
  1091. 2
  1092. 2
  1093. 2
  1094. 2
  1095. 2
  1096. 2
  1097. 2
  1098. 2
  1099. 2
  1100. 2
  1101. 2
  1102. 2
  1103. 2
  1104. 2
  1105. 2
  1106. 2
  1107. 2
  1108. 2
  1109. 2
  1110. 2
  1111. 2
  1112. 2
  1113. 2
  1114. 2
  1115. 2
  1116. 2
  1117. 2
  1118. 2
  1119. 2
  1120. 2
  1121. 2
  1122. 2
  1123. @David Siitherism Unlike Bernie, FDR didn't prise communism. AOC "Green New Deal" is a heavy command economy nearly like communism. http://theconversation.com/why-biologics-were-such-a-big-deal-in-the-trans-pacific-partnership-48595 During Obama administration, Australia's center-right wing federal government has identified US "data-exclusivity-medications" condition as the killer to their universal health care system. Aussie's medical patent system also supports the private insurance system's cost controls. Australian's nanny state difference vs Communism is the Aussie system enforces the ideal healthy market competition to cause downward pressure on health costs for both single-payer universal health care and private systems. https://www.thelocal.dk/20151101/danish-pm-in-us-denmark-is-not-socialist Danish PM in US: Denmark is not socialist https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_of_Economic_Freedom Many Nordic and CANZUK "nanny" states beat US on Economic Freedom index scores and thump communist states. Australia's nanny state system tumps Cuba. US already has a single-payer system via VA system, but it's gimped by monopolistic friendly patent laws and inefficient administration with high overheads. A Nordic nanny-state model combines life-critical welfare with a robust market lead economy. To quote Winston Churchill's centrist position The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings. The inherent virtue of Socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.” —House of Commons, 22 October 1945. "Helping the poor among us" idealogy has existed before Marxist communism.
    2
  1124. 2
  1125. 2
  1126. 2
  1127. 2
  1128. 2
  1129. 2
  1130. 2
  1131. 2
  1132. 2
  1133. 2
  1134. 2
  1135. 2
  1136. 2
  1137. 2
  1138. 2
  1139. 2
  1140. 2
  1141. 2
  1142. 2
  1143. 2
  1144. 2
  1145. 2
  1146. 2
  1147. 2
  1148. 2
  1149. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited. ----- Paul Keating is stupid.
    2
  1150. 2
  1151. 2
  1152. 2
  1153. 2
  1154. 2
  1155. 2
  1156. 2
  1157. 2
  1158. 2
  1159. 2
  1160. 2
  1161. 2
  1162. 2
  1163. 2
  1164. 2
  1165. 2
  1166. 2
  1167. 2
  1168. 2
  1169. 2
  1170. 2
  1171. 2
  1172. 2
  1173. 2
  1174. 2
  1175. 2
  1176. 2
  1177. 2
  1178. 2
  1179. 2
  1180. 2
  1181. 2
  1182.  @yggdrasil9039  Most recently, Bjørn Nyland had an opportunity to test the entry-level Made-in-China (MIC) Tesla Model 3 SR+ (currently named Tesla Model 3 RWD) with LFP (lithium iron phosphate) lithium-ion batteries. LFP battery chemistry is known for its limitation of charging at low temperatures (especially below 0°C). We already know that its winter range (at 1°C) is noticeably lower than in the Summer. But it was a test with a normal battery temperature (roughly 25°C). The next episode is about how the cold weather affect the Tesla Model 3. The car was left intentionally with a low state-of-charge and the battery had only a few degrees °C in the morning (outside temperature was 2°C). We can treat it as the worst-case scenario. The EV battery packs are thermally isolated so they maintain temperature quite long. The general operation of the car is surprisingly good and it appears to accelerate normally Regenerative braking is ok (it can reach substantial levels - up to a few times higher than continuous fast charging). However, the fast charging is significantly limited when the battery is cold. After plugging-in, the car was able to barely reach 20 kW at about 11% state-of-charge (SOC), and then it decreased to an even lower level, like 13 kW (after 10 minutes). This proves that the battery temperature is crucial for charging. Fortunately, the pre-conditioning of the battery (heating) ahead of fast charging (car feature), combined with driving (additional heat losses and heat scavenging) improves the charging performance relatively quickly. The later test at 8% SOC with 25°C battery temperature resulted in charging power of 111 kW (and it dropped to 90 kW after a while). The conclusion is to avoid leaving the cars in the cold, disconnected from a charging point, and if that happens, maybe start conditioning immediately to achieve best performance and fast charging capability.
    2
  1183. 2
  1184. 2
  1185. 2
  1186. 2
  1187. 2
  1188. 2
  1189. 2
  1190. 2
  1191. 2
  1192. 2
  1193. 2
  1194. 2
  1195. 2
  1196. 2
  1197.  @chrisyoung9194  >about profits for their mates at Woodside..Exxon and Chevron... That's a FALSE narrative. More than 99% of Australian LNG has been exported to Asia, mainly China, Japan, and South Korea. Australia’s Top 5 Oil and Gas Companies. 1. BHP Billiton Limited. The petroleum segment currently represents around 13% of BHP’s total business. 2. Woodside Petroleum Limited. Australia’s largest operator of oil and gas production, Woodside employs over 3,000 people and is headquartered in Perth. WA state has a Labor government. 3. Origin Energy Limited. Origin specialise in exploring, producing, generating, and retailing energy from their assets based in Queensland and the Northern Territory. Both Queensland and Northern Territory have Labor governments. 4. Santos (South Australian Northern Territory Oil Search) Limited. An independent oil and gas producer, it produces oil and gas from five central assets, located in Queensland (Labor government), the Northern Territory (Labor government); Papua New Guinea, Western Australia (Labor government), and New South Wales (LNP government). 5. Ampol Limited (Australian Petroleum). At its oil refinery in Lytton in Brisbane (Queensland Labor government), Ampol manufactures fuels including liquefied petroleum gas, petrol, diesel, jet fuel as well as lubricants, greases, and other specialty products. Chevron Corporation, the owner of the Caltex trademark, has given the notice to terminate the license agreement for use of the Caltex brand in Australia.
    2
  1198.  @robertmarmaduke9721  Following a shipwreck of a Ryukyuan vessel on the southeastern tip of Taiwan in winter of 1871, in which the heads of 54 crew members were taken by the aboriginal Taiwanese Paiwan people in the Mudan incident, the Japanese sought to use this incident as a pretext to have the Qing formally acknowledge Japanese sovereignty over the Ryukyu Islands as Japanese territory and to test reactions to potential expansion into Taiwan. According to records from Japanese documents, Mao Changxi [zh] and Dong Xun [zh], the Qing ministers at Zongli Yamen who handled the complaints from Japanese envoy Yanagihara Sakimitsu [ja], replied first that they had heard only of a massacre of Ryukyuans, not of Japanese, and quickly noted that Ryukyu was under Chinese suzerainty, and therefore this issue was not Japan's business. In addition, the governor-general of the Qing province Fujian had rescued the survivors of the massacre and returned them safely to Ryukyu. The Qing authorities explained that there were two kinds of aborigines on Taiwan: those governed by the Qing, and those unnaturalized "raw barbarians ... beyond the reach of Qing government and customs." They indirectly hinted that foreigners traveling in those areas settled by indigenous people must exercise caution. After the Yanagihara-Yamen interview, the Japanese took their explanation to mean that the Qing government had not opposed Japan's claims to sovereignty over the Ryukyu Islands, disclaimed any jurisdiction over Aboriginal Taiwanese, and had indeed consented to Japan's expedition to Taiwan.[51] The Qing dynasty made it clear to the Japanese that Taiwan was definitely within Qing jurisdiction, even though part of that island's aboriginal population was not yet under the influence of Chinese culture. The Qing also pointed to similar cases all over the world where an aboriginal population within a national boundary was not completely subjugated by the dominant culture of that country. The Japanese nevertheless launched an expedition to Mutan village with a force of 3600 soldiers in 1874. The number of killed Paiwan was about thirty, and that for the Japanese was six. Eventually, the Japanese withdrew after being paid a massive indemnity by the Qing. This incident caused the Qing to re-think the importance of Taiwan in their maritime defense strategy and greater importance was placed on gaining control over the wilderness regions. On the eve of the First Sino-Japanese War, about 45 percent of the island was administered under direct Qing administration while the remaining was lightly populated by Aborigines.[52] ... It was not until the defeat of the Chinese navy during the First Sino-Japanese War in 1894–95 that Japan was finally able to gain possession of Taiwan, and with it saw the shifting of Asian dominance from China to Japan. The Treaty of Shimonoseki was signed on April 17, 1895, ceding Taiwan and the Penghu Islands to Japan, which would rule the island for 50 years until its defeat in World War II. ----- On the eve of the First Sino-Japanese War, the Qing administration controls 45 percent of Taiwan.
    2
  1199. 2
  1200. 2
  1201. 2
  1202. 2
  1203. 2
  1204. 2
  1205. 2
  1206. 2
  1207. 2
  1208. 2
  1209.  @stephenhoward358  China Negative List 2020 a.k.a. anti-foreigner protectionist list Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    2
  1210. 2
  1211. 2
  1212. 2
  1213. 2
  1214. 2
  1215. 2
  1216. 2
  1217. 2
  1218. 2
  1219. 2
  1220. 2
  1221. 2
  1222. 2
  1223. 2
  1224. 2
  1225. 2
  1226. 2
  1227. 2
  1228. 2
  1229. 2
  1230. 2
  1231. 2
  1232. 2
  1233. 2
  1234. 2
  1235. 2
  1236. 2
  1237. 2
  1238. 2
  1239. 2
  1240. 2
  1241. 2
  1242. 2
  1243. 2
  1244. 2
  1245. 2
  1246. 2
  1247. 2
  1248. 2
  1249. 2
  1250. 2
  1251. 2
  1252. 2
  1253. 2
  1254. 2
  1255. 2
  1256. 2
  1257. 2
  1258. 2
  1259. 2
  1260. 2
  1261. 2
  1262. 2
  1263. 2
  1264. 2
  1265.  @fungi8419  From theage.com.au/national/former-trade-minister-s-wellness-business-owes-1-million-to-underworld-figure-20200605-p5500a.html Andrew Robb retired from politics in 2016 to become a business and political consultant, most recently advising the Victorian government on its decision to join China’s controversial Belt and Road Initiative. --- The Morrison federal government crushed Andrew Robb's advice and the Andrews Victorian state government's CCP Belt and Road Initiative. ----------------------- From skynews.com.au/details/_6159623173001 The Chinese-Australia influencer whose company helped the Victorian government sign up to the Belt and Road Initiative was hired "without any tender process" and without any public disclosure according to the Australian's Rachel Baxendale. Jean Dong, who has lived in Australia for close to 15 years, is the director of 'Australia China Belt and Road Initiative' a company paid more than $35,000 to consult the Victorian government on its deal with China. Ms Dong has hired key former politicians including former trade minister Andrew Robb, and former finance minister Lindsay Tanner, but without any financial compensation according to Ms Baxendale. "Are Lindsay Tanner and Andrew Robb doing this out of the goodness of their hearts," she said. Ms Baxendale told Sky News host Andrew Bolt, Jean Dong clearly has "very strong connections to powerful people within the Chinese Communist Party". ----------------------- Lindsay Tanner, Australian Labor Party MP. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lindsay_Tanner
    2
  1266. 2
  1267. 2
  1268. 2
  1269. 2
  1270. 2
  1271. 2
  1272. 2
  1273. 2
  1274. 2
  1275. 2
  1276. 2
  1277. 2
  1278. 2
  1279. 2
  1280. 2
  1281. 2
  1282. 2
  1283. 2
  1284. 2
  1285. 2
  1286. 2
  1287. 2
  1288. 2
  1289. 2
  1290. 2
  1291. 2
  1292. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    2
  1293. 2
  1294. 2
  1295. 2
  1296. 2
  1297. 2
  1298. 2
  1299. 2
  1300. 2
  1301. 2
  1302. 2
  1303. 2
  1304. 2
  1305. 2
  1306. 2
  1307. 2
  1308. 2
  1309. 2
  1310. 2
  1311. 2
  1312. 2
  1313. 2
  1314. 2
  1315. 2
  1316. 2
  1317. 2
  1318. 2
  1319. 2
  1320. 2
  1321. 2
  1322. 2
  1323. 2
  1324. 2
  1325. Before Euromaidan, Russia started a trade war against Ukraine, forcing Yanukovych to sign a base rental extension agreement that breached Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 disallows foreign military bases after 2017. Read the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 which disallows foreign military bases after 2017. CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on 28 June 1996 Article 17 The location of foreign military bases shall not be permitted on the territory of Ukraine. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17. After 2017, Ukraine's constitution is incompatible with foreign military bases hosting either NATO or CSTO. If Yanukovych didn't sign the military base rental extension, Russia would be kicked out of Crimea. Putin's narrative is FALSE. Putin's pressure caused Yanukovych to make a mistake. --- Every country has the right to operate a biolab and Ukraine did NOT invade another country. Basic pathology blood test requires a bio lab. Saddam's Iraq invaded two other countries i.e. Kuwait and Iran. Remember, Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum exchanged Ukraine's nuclear WMD for security assurances from US, UK, and Russia. France and China signed a watered-down Budapest Memorandum. Budapest Memorandum requires Ukraine to join Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty as part of Ukraine's nuclear WMD disarmament. Tucker is ignorant of Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum. Did you know Australia has similar security assurances like Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum and Australia does NOT have a NATO Article V level guarantee with the US? From 1950 to the 1960s, Australia detonated nuclear bombs as a joint partner with the UK. Australia has many Biolabs for agriculture, animal health, human health and 'etc'.
    2
  1326. 2
  1327. 2
  1328. 2
  1329. 2
  1330. 2
  1331. 2
  1332. 2
  1333. 1
  1334. 1
  1335. 1
  1336. 1
  1337. 1
  1338. 1
  1339. 1
  1340. 1
  1341. 1
  1342. 1
  1343. 1
  1344.  @gore1089  False narratives. Fraud conviction and reversal After a civil suit in 1999 that reached the Queensland Court of Appeal in 2000, involving disgruntled former One Nation member Terry Sharples and a finding of fraud when registering One Nation as a political party,[147] Hanson was facing bankruptcy. She made an appeal to supporters for donations. On 20 August 2003, a jury in the District Court of Queensland convicted Hanson and David Ettridge of electoral fraud. Both Hanson and Ettridge were sentenced to three years imprisonment for falsely claiming that 500 members of the Pauline Hanson Support Movement were members of the political organisation Pauline Hanson's One Nation to register that organisation in Queensland as a political party and apply for electoral funding. Because the registration was found to be unlawful, Hanson's receipt of electoral funding worth $498,637 resulted in two further convictions for dishonestly obtaining property, each with three-year sentences, to run concurrently with the first. The sentence was widely criticised in the media and by some politicians as being too harsh.[148] The prime minister, John Howard, said that it was "a very long, unconditional sentence" and Bronwyn Bishop said that Hanson was a political prisoner, comparing her conviction with Robert Mugabe's treatment of Zimbabwean opponents.[149] The sentence was widely criticised in the media as being too harsh.[148] On 6 November 2003, delivering judgment the day after hearing the appeal, the Queensland Court of Appeal quashed all of Hanson and Ettridge's convictions. Hanson, having spent 11 weeks in jail, was immediately released along with Ettridge.[150] The court's unanimous decision was that the evidence did not support a conclusion beyond reasonable doubt that the people on the list were not members of the Pauline Hanson's One Nation party and that Hanson and Ettridge knew this when the application to register the party was submitted. Accordingly, the convictions regarding registration were quashed. The convictions regarding funding, which depended on the same facts, were also quashed [149] This decision did not specifically follow the Sharples case, where the trial judge's finding of such fraud had not been overturned in the appeal by Hanson and Ettridge. That case was distinguished as a civil suit – in administrative law, as to the validity of the decision by Electoral Commissioner O'Shea to register the party – in which proof had been only on the balance of probabilities. Chief Justice Paul de Jersey, with whom the other two judges agreed overall, suggested that if Hanson, Ettridge and especially the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions had used better lawyers from the start, the whole matter might not have taken so long up to the appeal hearing, or might even have been avoided altogether. The Court of Appeal president, Margaret McMurdo, rebuked many politicians, including John Howard and Bronwyn Bishop MHR. Their observations, she said, demonstrated at least "a lack of understanding of the Rule of Law" and "an attempt to influence the judicial appellate process and to interfere with the independence of the judiciary for cynical political motives", although she praised other leading Coalition politicians for accepting the District Court's decision ---------------------- Margaret McMurdo was appointed by the ALP government (Peter Beattie)
    1
  1345. 1
  1346. 1
  1347. 1
  1348. 1
  1349. 1
  1350. 1
  1351. 1
  1352. 1
  1353. 1
  1354. 1
  1355.  @hollysmith1347  >And the whole lie of WMD. Why isn't Bush imprisoned for war crimes and U.S sanctioned? Twenty Iraqi Kurds have taken legal action to expose French firms who supplied poison gas to Saddam Hussein in 1988. The plaintiffs were among the victims of a chemical weapon attack that killed 5,000 in the town of Halabja during the Iran-Iraq war. A Dutch businessman who sold Iraq chemicals used in the attack was ordered to pay 400,000 euros to some of the victims in April 2013. ----- Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq ----- The Iraqi WMD issue is NOT yet over when Kurdish victims are suing European companies in the EU court system who sold chemicals to Saddam. LOL
    1
  1356. 1
  1357. 1
  1358. 1
  1359. 1
  1360. 1
  1361. 1
  1362. 1
  1363. 1
  1364. 1
  1365. 1
  1366. 1
  1367. 1
  1368. 1
  1369. 1
  1370. 1
  1371. 1
  1372. 1
  1373. 1
  1374. 1
  1375. 1
  1376. 1
  1377. 1
  1378. 1
  1379. 1
  1380. 1
  1381. 1
  1382. 1
  1383. 1
  1384.  @ozziecoops  Scott Ritter is an incompetent investigator who chicken out on investigating western businesses that profited from Iraqi WMDs. Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq -------- Iraq's WMD issue is not yet finished when the Kurds are suing WMD profiteers in the European court system.
    1
  1385. 1
  1386. 1
  1387. 1
  1388. 1
  1389.  @ozziecoops  The Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical.
    1
  1390. 1
  1391. 1
  1392. 1
  1393. 1
  1394. 1
  1395. 1
  1396. 1
  1397. 1
  1398. 1
  1399. 1
  1400. https://www.britannica.com/list/5-amazing-adaptations-of-pyrophytic-plants Adaptations of Pyrophytic Plants from bushfires. some species actually require fire for their seeds to sprout. Some plants, such as the lodgepole pine, Eucalyptus, and Banksia, have serotinous cones or fruits that are completely sealed with resin. ----- https://www.livescience.com/40583-australia-wildfires-eucalyptus-trees-bushfires.html Like many plants native to fire-prone regions, eucalyptus trees (aka gum trees in Australia) are adapted to survive — or even thrive — in a wildfire. Fallen eucalyptus leaves create dense carpets of flammable material, and the trees' bark peels off in long streamers that drop to the ground, providing additional fuel that draws ground fires up into the leaves, creating massive, fast-spreading "crown fires" in the upper story of eucalyptus forests. Additionally, the eucalyptus oil that gives the trees their characteristic spicy fragrance is a flammable oil: This oil, combined with leaf litter and peeling bark during periods of dry, windy weather, can turn a small ground fire into a terrifying, explosive firestorm in a matter of minutes. That's why eucalyptus trees — especially the blue gums (Eucalyptus globulus) that are common throughout New South Wales — are sometimes referred to wryly as "gasoline trees." And after a bushfire sweeps through an area, the eucalyptus trees have an advantage over other plants. Their seed capsules open up when burned, and the seedlings thrive in freshly burned, ash-rich soils. "Give a hillside a really good torching and the eucalyptus will absolutely dominate," Bowman told KQED. "They'll grow intensively in the first few years of life and outcompete everything."
    1
  1401. 1
  1402. 1
  1403. 1
  1404. 1
  1405. 1
  1406. 1
  1407. 1
  1408. 1
  1409. 1
  1410. 1
  1411. 1
  1412. 1
  1413. 1
  1414. 1
  1415. 1
  1416. 1
  1417. 1
  1418. 1
  1419. 1
  1420. 1
  1421. 1
  1422. 1
  1423. 1
  1424. 1
  1425. 1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. 1
  1429. 1
  1430. 1
  1431. 1
  1432. 1
  1433. 1
  1434. 1
  1435. 1
  1436. 1
  1437. 1
  1438. 1
  1439. 1
  1440. 1
  1441. 1
  1442. 1
  1443. 1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446. 1
  1447. 1
  1448. 1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. 1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 1
  1457. 1
  1458.  @johnbodman4504  Note that China has a "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" which is known as CCP's protectionist list. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  1459. 1
  1460. 1
  1461. 1
  1462. 1
  1463. 1
  1464. 1
  1465. 1
  1466. 1
  1467. 1
  1468. 1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474. 1
  1475. 1
  1476. 1
  1477. 1
  1478. 1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. 1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. 1
  1495. 1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500. 1
  1501. 1
  1502.  @ivanbremer8662  >No plan for Australia’s energy future. Labor and Greens are against CO2-free nuclear power. >No manufacturing. Blame Democrats under the Clinton administration for allowing China into WTO (trade zone) with promise exception entry. >No COVID plan. FALSE, Dan Andrews didn't like the detention center plan. >Failed vaccination plan. NSW's vaccination rates beat Victoria. Australia's vaccination rates exceeded the US's and Israel's. > Failed quarantine plan, only saved by state governments, medical professionals, virus trackers and the Australian people. FALSE, Dan Andrews didn't like the detention center plan. Dan Andrews's hotel quarantine has failed, hence the second wave. > Failed Aussie repatriation. (With more parked aircraft and pilots than ever in history.) Fools like you caused the second wave. >Failed to build Federal, purpose built quarantine. (We have a military trained and experienced at build facility's in developing country's in a crises.) FALSE, Dan Andrews didn't like the detention center plan. Dan Andrews's hotel quarantine has failed. Daniel Andrews took the idea of state govt’s running quarantine to National Cabinet! Watch video. ------------------------- >No plan for electric car infrastructure or manufacture. Labor appointed Judge killed Toyota Australia's electric-petrol hybrid engine manufacturing. >Sports rorts, That's leftist ABC link. Bridget McKenzie: no politicisation in ‘sports rorts’ funding >Timor-Leste bugging. You're supporting countries outside of Australia. It reveals your anti-Australia position. >Water rorts 19 percent of QLD's surface water entitlements are owned by foreigners. The report released in January 2019 by the Productivity Commission that found, the Murray-Darling Basin Authority should be broken up. Whilst the MDBA is a Commonwealth Government agency, an inter-governmental Murray‑Darling Basin Ministerial Council (Ministerial Council) acts in an advisory role in preparing and implementing the Basin Plan by the MDBA. The Ministerial Council comprises the Commonwealth Minister for Agriculture and Water Resources (who also chairs the Council) and one minister from each of the Basin states (Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria, and South Australia) and the Australian Capital Territory. QLD has a Labor government! >Robo debt The Government announced in May 2020 that they would commence paying back refunds from early July 2020. As at May 2021, the vast majority of refunds had been paid. The refund will include the repayment of any money paid towards a Robodebt as well as interest charged on the debt. >Billions in unchecked job keeper to profitable companies. Told they can keep the money. This is NOT the Australian government's fault. Blame CCP for COVID-19. > Half of the "Emergency" bushfire money still not given out, over 12 months later and 99% of that has gone to marginal independent and Liberal seats Wrong narrative. Federal ALP has very weak representation in the bush in the 1st place and bushfires occurred mostly in federal LNP held seats. > property valued at $3 mil purchased by the government for $30 mil Leftist narrative from leftist news media i.e. theguardian Counter: The Australian Federal Police are investigating the purchase of the Leppington Triangle land, later valued at only $3 million, with Infrastructure Department boss Simon Atkinson confirming two public servants face additional internal investigations over the deal. The Leppington Pastoral Company has said it "was not a willing seller at the time and the price received was considered fair and reasonable value given the significance of the land to our dairy business". There is no suggestion of any wrongdoing on the part of the Perich family. The audit report said government officials focused on "incentivising an unwilling seller to dispose of their land some 32 years in advance of when it was anticipated to be needed" for a potential second runway in a future stage of the new Nancy Bird Walton Airport development.
    1
  1503. 1
  1504. 1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. 1
  1510. 1
  1511. 1
  1512. 1
  1513. 1
  1514. 1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. 1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. 1
  1521. 1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1
  1524. 1
  1525. 1
  1526. 1
  1527. 1
  1528. 1
  1529. 1
  1530. 1
  1531. 1
  1532. Every country has the right to operate a biolab and Ukraine did NOT invade another country. Basic pathology blood test requires a bio lab. Saddam's Iraq invaded two other countries i.e. Kuwait and Iran. Remember, Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum exchanged Ukraine's nuclear WMD for security assurances from US, UK, and Russia. France and China signed a watered-down Budapest Memorandum. Budapest Memorandum requires Ukraine to join Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty as part of Ukraine's nuclear WMD disarmament. Tucker is ignorant of Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum. Did you know Australia has similar security assurances like Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum and Australia does NOT have a NATO Article V level guarantee with the US? From 1950 to the 1960s, Australia detonated nuclear bombs as a joint partner with the UK. Australia has many Biolabs for agriculture, animal health, human health and 'etc'. --- Before Euromaidan, Russia started a trade war against Ukraine, forcing Yanukovych to sign a base rental extension agreement that breached Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 disallows foreign military bases after 2017. Read the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 which disallows foreign military bases after 2017. CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on 28 June 1996 Article 17 The location of foreign military bases shall not be permitted on the territory of Ukraine. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17. After 2017, Ukraine's constitution is incompatible with foreign military bases hosting either NATO or CSTO. If Yanukovych didn't sign the military base rental extension, Russia would be kicked out of Crimea. Putin's narrative is FALSE. Putin's pressure caused Yanukovych to make a mistake.
    1
  1533. 1
  1534. 1
  1535. 1
  1536. 1
  1537. 1
  1538. 1
  1539. 1
  1540. 1
  1541. 1
  1542. 1
  1543. 1
  1544. 1
  1545. 1
  1546. 1
  1547.  @Habib_Osman  From https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/report/downloadreportbyfilename?filename=Biofuels%20Annual_Canberra_Australia_11-7-2018.pdf NSW Government Biofuels Policy NSW introduced an ethanol biofuels mandate in 2017 to encourage broader use of ethanol and other biofuels in the State. Most cars in NSW that use unleaded petroleum (ULP) can use 10 percent ethanol-blended fuel. The NSW government has a legislated ethanol supply mandate of E6 for wholesale companies and a requirement for retailers with 20 or more outlets to offer ethanol product for sale. Under the NSW Biofuels Act 2007, a certain percentage of the total volume of petrol sold in NSW is required to be ethanol and a certain percentage is required to be biodiesel. The main objective of the policy is to support the development of a sustainable biofuels industry in NSW. The Act has a number of secondary objectives, including (a) improving air quality; (b) addressing climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions; (c) providing consumers with cheaper fuel options; (d) reducing the reliance of NSW on imported petroleum products; and (e) supporting regional development. The Biofuels Act is administered by the NSW Office of Fair Trading. The NSW E6 mandate (with exemptions) requires that ethanol must represent six percent of the total volume of petrol sold in NSW. A B2 mandate also exists, which requires two percent of the total volume of diesel sold to be biodiesel. A range of exemptions are provided to petrol retailers, which effectively lowers their ethanol requirements below the E6 mandate. The NSW government has sought to reduce the number of exemptions to the Biofuels Act to encourage greater use of fuel ethanol. Under an amendment to the Biofuels Act, all fuel retailers that sell three or more types of petrol and diesel and have sales above a certain threshold will need to comply with the ethanol mandate.
    1
  1548. 1
  1549. 1
  1550. 1
  1551. 1
  1552. 1
  1553. 1
  1554. 1
  1555. 1
  1556. 1
  1557. 1
  1558. 1
  1559. 1
  1560.  @trumpbuddha1053  Note that China has a "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" which is known as CCP's protectionist list. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  1561. 1
  1562. 1
  1563. 1
  1564. 1
  1565. Note that China has a "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" which is known as CCP's protectionist list. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. ------------------------ China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  1566. 1
  1567. 1
  1568. 1
  1569. 1
  1570. 1
  1571. 1
  1572. 1
  1573. 1
  1574. 1
  1575.  @ivanbremer8662  Against https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=112611767758738&id=100070297463523 >Sports rorts, That's the leftist ABC link. Counter: From afr.com/politics/federal/bridget-mckenzie-rejects-politicisation-of-sports-rorts-funding-20210212-p571w9 Bridget McKenzie: no politicisation in ‘sports rorts’ funding >Timor-Leste bugging. You're supporting countries outside of Australia. It reveals your anti-Australia position. >Water rorts From watersource.awa.asn.au/business/assets-and-operations/foreign-ownership-of-water-assets-revealed/ The current situation with Australia's water entitlements. Also, read cdn.tspace.gov.au/uploads/sites/79/2019/02/2018-Register-of-foreign-ownership-Water-entitlements.pdf 19 percent of QLD's surface water entitlements are owned by foreigners. The report released in January 2019 by the Productivity Commission that found, the Murray-Darling Basin Authority should be broken up. From en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray-Darling_Basin_Authority Whilst the MDBA is a Commonwealth Government agency, an inter-governmental Murray‑Darling Basin Ministerial Council (Ministerial Council) acts in an advisory role in preparing and implementing the Basin Plan by the MDBA. The Ministerial Council comprises the Commonwealth Minister for Agriculture and Water Resources (who also chairs the Council) and one minister from each of the Basin states (Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria, and South Australia) and the Australian Capital Territory. QLD has a Labor government! >Robo debt The Government announced in May 2020 that they would commence paying back refunds from early July 2020. As at May 2021, the vast majority of refunds had been paid. The refund will include the repayment of any money paid towards a Robodebt as well as interest charged on the debt. >Billions in unchecked job keeper to profitable companies. Told they can keep the money. This is NOT the Australian government's fault. Blame CCP for COVID-19. > Half of the "Emergency" bushfire money still not given out, over 12 months later and 99% of that has gone to marginal independent and Liberal seats Wrong narrative. Federal ALP has very weak representation in the bush and bushfires occurred mostly in federal LNP held seats. Federal ALP dominates inner-city seats.
    1
  1576. 1
  1577. 1
  1578. 1
  1579. 1
  1580. 1
  1581. 1
  1582.  @SigmaMaleCountMartelus  Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq ----- The Iraqi WMD issue is not over.
    1
  1583. 1
  1584. 1
  1585. 1
  1586. 1
  1587. 1
  1588. 1
  1589. 1
  1590. 1
  1591. 1
  1592. 1
  1593. 1
  1594. 1
  1595. 1
  1596.  @TheShezu  Prove "world peace treaty". There is no such thing as a "world peace treaty". Poland and Baltic countries are against Russia. Finland is against Russia i.e. Finns purchased Israeli medium-range strike missiles. Estonia is against Russia i.e. Estonia purchased Israeli medium-range strike missiles. Poland purchased Israeli-designed Stunner interceptor missiles for its PAC3. Reminder, Russian Federation still has its Russian Empire's land area largely intact. You can't say the same for non-existent Spanish, French, and British empires. Your argument is hypocritical. Ukraine Constitution 1991, Article 17, disallows foreign military bases after 2017. According to former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, Ukraine's constitution forbids the country from hosting foreign military bases after 2017. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1991, Article 17. In 2018, President Petro Poroshenko's constitution amendment allowed temporary foreign military bases. Victoria Nuland herself doesn't have the power, but about 73% of the MPs—voted to "remove Viktor Yanukovych from the post of president of Ukraine" has the power. Don't assume Ukraine's president has absolute power when 73% of the MPs have voted to "remove Viktor Yanukovych from the post of president of Ukraine". >As all you know they have the world's best defense systems. S400 and more Rented S400 is useless in Syria. >Because Nato and America is expanding towards their boarder against 1991 treaty Prove "1991 treaty". Anyone who supports the current Russian's view on the two-sphere of influence zones in Europe only continues Nazi Germany-Soviet Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact i.e. the original plan that divides Europe into east/west sphere of influence zones. NATO does NOT support Nazi Germany-Soviet Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact version 2.0.
    1
  1597. 1
  1598.  @TheShezu  Putin: “Speaking of security guarantees … our actions will not depend upon the negotiations, they will depend on the unconditional compliance with Russian security demands”. The main articles of Russian draft proposed agreement demand included eight articles with the following points: Article 1: the parties should not strengthen their security at the expense of Russia’s security; Article 2: the parties will use multilateral consultations and the NATO-Russia Council to address points of conflict; Article 3: the parties reaffirm that they do not consider each other as adversaries and maintain a dialogue; Article 4: the parties shall not deploy military forces and weaponry on the territory of any of the other states in Europe in addition to any forces that were deployed as of May 27, 1997; Article 5: the parties shall not deploy land-based intermediate- and short-range missiles adjacent to the other parties; Article 6: all member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization commit themselves to refrain from any further enlargement of NATO, including the accession of Ukraine as well as other States; Article 7: the parties that are member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization shall not conduct any military activity on the territory of Ukraine as well as other States in the Eastern Europe, in the South Caucasus and in Central Asia; and Article 8: the agreement shall not be interpreted as affecting the primary responsibility of the Security Council of the United Nations for maintaining international peace and security. ---------------- For Article 1, Israel sells missile technology to Eastern Europe while Russia sells missile technology to Israel's adversaries. For Article 3, Being labeled adversaries are based on action and behaviors. Finland, Poland, and the Baltic states have purchased Israeli missile technology and have historical issues with Imperialist Russia. Russia plays "the great game" geopolitics longer than US's existence. For Article 4, Russia's demand to degrade NATO's Article V enforcement. Russia dictating terms against Three Seas Initiative member countries. For Article 5, Israel sells missile technology to Eastern Europe while Russia sells missile technology to Israel's adversaries. For Article 6, Russia demands to restrict counties in Eastern Europe's freedom of association. For Article 7, Russia's demand to degrade NATO's Article V enforcement for NATO members in Eastern Europe. Russia dictating terms against Three Seas Initiative member countries. For Article 8, Putin's bullshit statement.
    1
  1599. 1
  1600. 1
  1601. 1
  1602. 1
  1603. 1
  1604. 1
  1605. 1
  1606. 1
  1607. 1
  1608. 1
  1609. 1
  1610. 1
  1611. 1
  1612. 1
  1613. 1
  1614. 1
  1615. 1
  1616. 1
  1617. 1
  1618. 1
  1619. 1
  1620. 1
  1621. 1
  1622. 1
  1623. 1
  1624. 1
  1625. 1
  1626. 1
  1627. 1
  1628. 1
  1629. 1
  1630. 1
  1631. 1
  1632. 1
  1633. 1
  1634. 1
  1635. 1
  1636. 1
  1637. 1
  1638. 1
  1639. 1
  1640. 1
  1641. 1
  1642. 1
  1643. 1
  1644. 1
  1645. 1
  1646. 1
  1647. 1
  1648. 1
  1649. 1
  1650. 1
  1651. @Runaway Puppet The Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". --------------- In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical. USSR's proxy attempted to remove Chile's check-and-balance Congress system. USSR's proxy attempted to concentrate political power into a single entity (individual and political party).
    1
  1652. @Runaway Puppet China has established foreign police stations across the world that are told to be closed down by foreign governments. China's "little green men" have inferred in medical supplies in Australia during 1st wave of COVID-19. China has engaged in territorial disputes based on Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng). The Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng) were a series of military campaigns launched by the Qing dynasty of China in the mid–late 18th century during the reign of the Qianlong Emperor (r. 1735–1796). They included three to enlarge the area of Qing control in Inner Asia: two against the Dzungars (1755–1757) and the "pacification" of Xinjiang (1758–1759). The other seven campaigns were more in the nature of police actions on frontiers already established: two wars to suppress the Gyalrong of Jinchuan, Sichuan, another to suppress the Taiwanese Aboriginals (1787–88), and four expeditions abroad against the Burmese (1765–1769), the Vietnamese (1788–1789), and the Gurkhas on the border between Tibet and Nepal (1790–1792), with the last counting as two. President Xi's argument is based on historical Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng). Xi's China has a territorial dispute with Vietnam. Xi's China has a territorial dispute with Taiwan. Xi's China has a territorial dispute with India (near Tibet and Nepal). Xi's China has a territorial dispute with the Philippines. Xi's China has a territorial dispute with Japan. This old world existed before the US became a superpower. China and Russia think that communism clean slate of their imperialist colonial past.
    1
  1653. 1
  1654. 1
  1655. 1
  1656. 1
  1657. 1
  1658. 1
  1659. 1
  1660. 1
  1661. 1
  1662. 1
  1663. 1
  1664. 1
  1665. 1
  1666. 1
  1667. 1
  1668. 1
  1669. 1
  1670. 1
  1671. 1
  1672. 1
  1673. 1
  1674. 1
  1675. 1
  1676. 1
  1677. 1
  1678. 1
  1679. 1
  1680. 1
  1681. 1
  1682. 1
  1683. 1
  1684. 1
  1685. 1
  1686. 1
  1687. 1
  1688. 1
  1689. 1
  1690. 1
  1691. 1
  1692. 1
  1693. 1
  1694. 1
  1695. 1
  1696. 1
  1697. 1
  1698. 1
  1699. 1
  1700. 1
  1701. 1
  1702. 1
  1703. 1
  1704. 1
  1705. 1
  1706. 1
  1707. 1
  1708. 1
  1709. 1
  1710. 1
  1711. 1
  1712. 1
  1713. 1
  1714. 1
  1715. 1
  1716. 1
  1717.  @paulchiu596  https://www.forbes.com/sites/douglasbulloch/2016/10/12/protectionism-may-be-rising-around-the-world-but-in-china-it-never-went-away/#5dc3f5df73da Protectionism May Be Rising Around The World, But In China It Never Went Away Promises unkept? Since joining the WTO in 2001, China has repeatedly insisted that it will live up to those undertakings made on entry. In particular, the use of currency manipulation has been identified by the US as a breech of the commitment to end price controls for the purposes of protecting domestic industries. This became a major political issue from 2005 onwards, and has only recently subsided because it is assumed that the RMB is slightly overvalued on the market. Nevertheless, for years it was deliberate policy for the PBoC to accumulate US Dollars and suppress the exchange rate for the RMB, resulting in exactly the price distortions China had committed to eliminate in 2001, and fuelling an enormous trade surplus with the US, which persists and expands to this day. Furthermore TRIPS implementation has been given some effect on paper, but has made little progress when it comes to 'enforcement.' This is (according to the WTO) as recently as February 2015, fully 14 years after TRIPS was supposed to be already in effect. The US Trade Representative produces an annual report to Congress on China's WTO compliance which leaves little room to conclude they have so far lived up to their accession commitments. The most recent several-hundred-page document - produced in December 2015 - recites a long list of small measures, committees established, announcements made and new administrative complications faced, all continuing disputes over an agreement theoretically in effect since 2001. Although, therefore, protectionism is rising around the world, it is also true to say that existing practices of protectionism have not fallen in the way that they should have since China's accession to the WTO in 2001. Because of this lack of progress in easing trade, the extended period of currency manipulation, the lack of observance of TRIPS and the sheer administrative resistance exporters face when trying to get their products into China, we now face of world of highly unbalanced trade, and rising mistrust. And it is this that is leading to rising protectionism; the simple fact that it never went away. ----------------------------
    1
  1718. 1
  1719. 1
  1720. 1
  1721. 1
  1722. 1
  1723. 1
  1724. 1
  1725. 1
  1726. 1
  1727. 1
  1728. 1
  1729. 1
  1730. 1
  1731. 1
  1732. 1
  1733. 1
  1734. 1
  1735. 1
  1736. 1
  1737. 1
  1738. 1
  1739. 1
  1740. 1
  1741. 1
  1742. 1
  1743. 1
  1744.  @yt.personal.identification  https://www.forbes.com/sites/douglasbulloch/2016/10/12/protectionism-may-be-rising-around-the-world-but-in-china-it-never-went-away/#5dc3f5df73da Protectionism May Be Rising Around The World, But In China It Never Went Away Promises unkept? Since joining the WTO in 2001, China has repeatedly insisted that it will live up to those undertakings made on entry. In particular, the use of currency manipulation has been identified by the US as a breech of the commitment to end price controls for the purposes of protecting domestic industries. This became a major political issue from 2005 onwards, and has only recently subsided because it is assumed that the RMB is slightly overvalued on the market. Nevertheless, for years it was deliberate policy for the PBoC to accumulate US Dollars and suppress the exchange rate for the RMB, resulting in exactly the price distortions China had committed to eliminate in 2001, and fuelling an enormous trade surplus with the US, which persists and expands to this day. Furthermore TRIPS implementation has been given some effect on paper, but has made little progress when it comes to 'enforcement.' This is (according to the WTO) as recently as February 2015, fully 14 years after TRIPS was supposed to be already in effect. The US Trade Representative produces an annual report to Congress on China's WTO compliance which leaves little room to conclude they have so far lived up to their accession commitments. The most recent several-hundred-page document - produced in December 2015 - recites a long list of small measures, committees established, announcements made and new administrative complications faced, all continuing disputes over an agreement theoretically in effect since 2001. Although, therefore, protectionism is rising around the world, it is also true to say that existing practices of protectionism have not fallen in the way that they should have since China's accession to the WTO in 2001. Because of this lack of progress in easing trade, the extended period of currency manipulation, the lack of observance of TRIPS and the sheer administrative resistance exporters face when trying to get their products into China, we now face of world of highly unbalanced trade, and rising mistrust. And it is this that is leading to rising protectionism; the simple fact that it never went away.
    1
  1745. 1
  1746. 1
  1747. 1
  1748. 1
  1749. 1
  1750. 1
  1751. 1
  1752. 1
  1753. 1
  1754. 1
  1755. 1
  1756. 1
  1757. 1
  1758. 1
  1759. 1
  1760. 1
  1761. 1
  1762. 1
  1763. 1
  1764. 1
  1765. 1
  1766. 1
  1767. 1
  1768. 1
  1769. 1
  1770. 1
  1771. 1
  1772. 1
  1773. 1
  1774. 1
  1775. 1
  1776. 1
  1777. 1
  1778. 1
  1779. 1
  1780. 1
  1781. 1
  1782. 1
  1783. 1
  1784. 1
  1785. 1
  1786. 1
  1787. 1
  1788. 1
  1789. 1
  1790. 1
  1791. 1
  1792. 1
  1793. 1
  1794. 1
  1795. 1
  1796. 1
  1797. 1
  1798. 1. KMT is overreaching its territorial claim since on the eve of the 1894 Sino-Japanese War, about 45 percent of the island was administered under the Manchus Qing administration (Imperial China) while the remaining land area was populated by Taiwanese aborigines. 2. KMT was militarily defeated by CCP. KMT rejected CCP and it has runaway to Formosa. 3. KMT was politically defeated by partly aboriginal Taiwanese Tsai Ing-wen Democratic Progressive Party. ---- Chiang Kai-Shek Supplementing The Act Of Surrender 1945 excluded Manchuria, Formosa, and French Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude. Order Of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-Shek Supplementing The Act Of Surrender 1945 This is order No. 1 of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek to the Japanese forces in China, excluding Manchuria, Formosa, and French Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude, which were surrendered under the act of 9 September 1945. This order supplements the acts of surrender to the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers and his General Order No. 1. September 9, 1945 Order of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek supplementing the Act of Surrender 9 September 1945 Immediately following the signing of the Act of Surrender ending the war in the China Theatre, General Ho Ying-chen handed Order No. 1 of Generalissimo Chiang to Lieut. Gen. Okamura Yasutsugu as a supplement to the Act of Surrender. I. This is order No. 1 of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek to the Japanese forces in China, excluding Manchuria, Formosa, and French Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude, which were surrendered under the act of 9 September 1945. This order supplements the acts of surrender to the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers and his General Order No. 1.
    1
  1799. 1
  1800. 1
  1801. 1
  1802. 1
  1803. 1
  1804. 1
  1805. 1
  1806. 1
  1807. 1
  1808. 1
  1809. 1
  1810. 1
  1811. 1
  1812. 1
  1813. 1
  1814. 1
  1815. 1
  1816. 1
  1817. 1
  1818. 1
  1819. 1
  1820. 1
  1821. 1
  1822. 1
  1823. 1
  1824. 1
  1825. 1
  1826. 1
  1827. 1
  1828. 1
  1829. 1
  1830. 1
  1831. 1
  1832. 1
  1833. 1
  1834. 1
  1835. 1
  1836. 1
  1837. 1
  1838. 1
  1839. 1
  1840. 1
  1841. 1
  1842. 1
  1843. 1
  1844. 1
  1845. 1
  1846. 1
  1847. 1
  1848. 1
  1849. 1
  1850. 1
  1851. 1
  1852. 1
  1853. 1
  1854. 1
  1855. 1
  1856. 1
  1857. 1
  1858. 1
  1859. 1
  1860. 1
  1861. 1
  1862. 1
  1863. 1
  1864. 1
  1865. 1
  1866. 1
  1867. 1
  1868. 1
  1869. 1
  1870. 1
  1871. 1
  1872. 1
  1873. 1
  1874. 1
  1875. 1
  1876. 1
  1877. 1
  1878. 1
  1879. 1
  1880. 1
  1881. 1
  1882. 1
  1883. 1
  1884. 1
  1885. 1
  1886. 1
  1887. 1
  1888. 1
  1889. 1
  1890. 1
  1891. 1
  1892. 1
  1893. 1
  1894. 1
  1895. 1
  1896. 1
  1897. 1
  1898. 1
  1899.  @Arangggg  https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/covid-19-genetic-network-analysis-provides-snapshot-of-pandemic-origins Study charts the 'incipient supernova' of COVID-19 through genetic mutations as it spread from China and Asia to Australia, Europe and North America Versions of ‘A’ were seen in Chinese individuals, and Americans reported to have lived in Wuhan, and mutated versions of ‘A’ were found in patients from the USA and Australia. Wuhan’s major virus type, ‘B’, was prevalent in patients from across East Asia. However, the variant didn’t travel much beyond the region without further mutations – implying a 'founder event' in Wuhan, or 'resistance' against this type of COVID-19 outside East Asia, say researchers. From https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2020/04/07/2004999117 has https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/early/2020/04/07/2004999117/F1.large.jpg Fig. 1. Phylogenetic network of 160 SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Node A is the root cluster obtained with the bat (R. affinis) coronavirus isolate BatCoVRaTG13 from Yunnan Province. Circle areas are proportional to the number of taxa, and each notch on the links represents a mutated nucleotide position. The sequence range under consideration is 56 to 29,797, with nucleotide position (np) numbering according to the Wuhan 1 reference sequence (8). The median-joining network algorithm (2) and the Steiner algorithm (9) were used, both implemented in the software package Network5011CS (https://www.fluxus-engineering.com/), with the parameter epsilon set to zero, generating this network containing 288 most-parsimonious trees of length 229 mutations. The reticulations are mainly caused by recurrent mutations at np11083. The 161 taxa (160 human viruses and one bat virus) yield 101 distinct genomic sequences. The phylogenetic diagram is available for detailed scrutiny in A0 poster format (SI Appendix, Fig. S5) and in the free Network download files.
    1
  1900. 1
  1901. 1
  1902. 1
  1903. 1
  1904. 1
  1905. 1
  1906. 1
  1907. 1
  1908. 1
  1909. 1
  1910. 1
  1911. 1
  1912. 1
  1913. 1
  1914. 1
  1915.  MaxSt Arlyn  https://supchina.com/2018/03/23/why-chinese-companies-crush-western-tech-giants-in-china/ For example, Bloomberg published an article earlier this month titled “China protectionism creates tech billionaires who protect Xi,” with the author stating, “That’s helped create thriving domestic giants, including Tencent Holdings Ltd. and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.” Mark Natkin, managing director of Beijing-based Marbridge Consulting, was quoted as saying, “As long as they remain protected in the China market, they’ll dominate and use that money to fund their global expansion.” https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/china-how-big-tech-learning-love-party Wang Xiaochuan, CEO of Sogou, a Tencent-backed search engine, explained this dynamic explicitly in a quote leaked in March of this year: We’re entering an era in which we'll be fused together. It might be that there will be a request to establish a Party committee within your company, or that you should let state investors take a stake, you know, as a form of mixed ownership https://www.afr.com/brand/chanticleer/chinese-tech-stocks-pose-an-investment-dilemma-20180815-h1410o Baidu became China's No.1 search engine partly because Google was outlawed. Tencent became the world's largest gaming company and owner of China's No.1 messaging system without needing to compete with Facebook's WhatsApp. Baidu and Tencent are prime examples of Chinese companies simply copying the successful business models created in Silicon Valley and then rolling them out without fear of competition at home. Alibaba, which built the world's largest online retailing business, was allowed to dominate China's small business lending without interference from foreigners or much competition from local government-owned entities.
    1
  1916. 1
  1917.  MaxSt Arlyn  The businesses are 1. Country Garden, a totally owned subsidiary of Country Garden Holdings, one of China’s largest property developers. 2. Risland, Risland Holdings is a Hong Kong-based multinational real estate conglomerate Employees of Greenland Australia, a subsidiary of the Chinese government-backed global property giant Greenland Group, were instructed to put their normal work on hold and source bulk supplies of essential medical items to ship back to China. In February Risland’s LinkedIn page showed pallet-loads of safety gear being stored in a warehouse ready for shipment. "90 tons of selective medical supplies… ready for the air transport direct from Sydney to Wuhan via corporate jet on Monday next week," said the company’s post. It's a Russian style "little green" style operation. https://www.smh.com.au/national/second-developer-flies-82-tonnes-of-medical-supplies-to-china-20200326-p54e8n.html These companies are proxies for CCP government. CCP back companies in Australia shipped medical supplies to China. It's a Russian style "little green" style operation. Medical supplies are not Nike shoes or Apple iPhones. https://www.smh.com.au/national/former-chinese-military-man-behind-export-of-tonnes-of-medical-supplies-20200330-p54f8a.html A former Chinese military officer worked with Chinese Communist Party agencies and a group with links to organised crime to export tonnes of Australian medical supplies to Wuhan at the height of the coronavirus epidemic there ----- https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-01/coronavirus-chinese-ppe-border-force-intercepted/12085908 Australia seizes faulty coronavirus protective equipment imported from China
    1
  1918. 1
  1919. 1
  1920. 1
  1921. 1
  1922. 1
  1923. 1
  1924. 1
  1925. 1
  1926. 1
  1927. 1
  1928. 1
  1929. 1
  1930. 1
  1931. 1
  1932. 1
  1933. 1
  1934. 1
  1935. 1
  1936. 1
  1937. 1
  1938. 1
  1939. 1
  1940. 1
  1941. 1
  1942. 1
  1943. 1
  1944. 1
  1945. 1
  1946. 1
  1947. 1
  1948. 1
  1949. 1
  1950. 1
  1951. 1
  1952. 1
  1953. 1
  1954. 1
  1955. 1
  1956. 1
  1957. 1
  1958. 1
  1959. 1
  1960. 1
  1961. 1
  1962. 1
  1963. 1
  1964. 1
  1965. 1
  1966. 1
  1967. 1
  1968. 1
  1969. 1
  1970. 1
  1971. 1
  1972. 1
  1973. 1
  1974. 1
  1975. 1
  1976. 1
  1977. 1
  1978. 1
  1979. 1
  1980. 1
  1981. 1
  1982. 1
  1983. 1
  1984. 1
  1985. 1
  1986. 1
  1987. 1
  1988. 1
  1989. 1
  1990. 1
  1991. 1
  1992. 1
  1993. 1
  1994. 1
  1995. 1
  1996. 1
  1997. 1
  1998. 1
  1999. 1
  2000. 1
  2001. 1
  2002. 1
  2003. 1
  2004. 1
  2005. 1
  2006. 1
  2007. 1
  2008. 1
  2009. 1
  2010. 1
  2011. 1
  2012. 1
  2013. 1
  2014. 1
  2015. 1
  2016. 1
  2017. 1
  2018. 1
  2019. 1
  2020. 1
  2021. 1
  2022. 1
  2023. 1
  2024. 1
  2025. 1
  2026. 1
  2027. 1
  2028.  @sheronbuytten7054  0. It reaffirms its interest in a peaceful settlement of the Taiwan question by the Chinese themselves, the text from the Nixon Foundation. Again, the 1972 Shanghai Communiqué has a condition i.e. peaceful settlement of the Taiwan question. 1. The US signed Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum that exchanged Ukraine's nuclear weapons (Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons) for security assurances. Russia's Budapest Memorandum security assurance is toilet paper. France and China signed a watered-down Budapest Memorandum with Ukraine. 2. Russia started a hot war against Ukraine. Russia's land grabbed Ukraine's five oblasts. Don't disturb when the opponent is making a mistake. Putin is the best salesman for NATO. 3. Which people? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0x1vJqRDppU Three Seas Initiative explained and they blame their less developed status on Russia! "Russian Warship, Go Fukc yourself." Repeated by the Latvian MP Rihards Kols. 4. 20181223/french-president-says-an-ally-must-be-reliable-after-us-syria-pullout-announcement Macron says 'an ally must be reliable' after US Syria pullout announcement. Macron's anger against Trump's US Syria pullout reveals the real background pusher against Syria e.g. EU. Look in the mirror Macron. "On 10 March 2011, France was the first country in the world to recognise the National Transitional Council as the legitimate government of Libya". Look in the mirror Macron. 5. Timeline of Yugoslav breakup 1 October 1990: George Bush, in a meeting with the Yugoslav president of the Presidency, gives full support to Yugoslavia. 19 December 1991: Germany announces that it will recognize Croatia on January 15, 1992, with or without the rest of the European Community. 23 December 1991: Germany becomes the first major power to recognize Croatia and Slovenia as independent states 15 January 1992: The European Community recognizes Slovenia and Croatia. The Russian narrative to decouple North America's raw material security guarantees from mainland Europe will enable Russia to win any war of attrition against Germany! Germany knows the narrative to detach Europe from North America's raw material security guarantees. Germany used NATO with North America's raw material security guarantees to further its own interest when it failed in WW1's goals. NATO was used to check Russia and avoid the WW1 trigger. Your narrative is Russian's POV. Hint: Ask Poland, Finland, and Baltic countries. 6. Refer to my counter point 4.
    1
  2029. 1
  2030.  @sheronbuytten7054  7. In 2019 China blocked Australia's and New Zealand's marine park proposals in Antarctica. It is the eighth year the proposal has been knocked back, with China and Russia voting the proposal down on previous occasions. This caused Australia to enlist help from the EU while New Zealand enlist help from the US. ------ President Xi's argument is based on historical Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns. Territorial disputes around Xi's China are based on Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns. The Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng) were a series of military campaigns launched by the Qing dynasty of China in the mid–late 18th century during the reign of the Qianlong Emperor (r. 1735–1796). They included three to enlarge the area of Qing control in Inner Asia: two against the Dzungars (1755–1757) and the "pacification" of Xinjiang (1758–1759). The other seven campaigns were more in the nature of police actions on frontiers already established: two wars to suppress the Gyalrong of Jinchuan, Sichuan, another to suppress the Taiwanese Aboriginals (1787–88), and four expeditions abroad against the Burmese (1765–1769), the Vietnamese (1788–1789), and the Gurkhas on the border between Tibet and Nepal (1790–1792), with the last counting as two. During the 4th Sino-Burmese Wars starting in 1768, Imperial China invaded the Kingdom of Burma. Burma hired European musketeers and gunners, hence Burma allied itself with the rising French Empire against Imperial China's invasion. Imperial China's imperialist conquest led to kinetic engagement with other powers. Look in the mirror.
    1
  2031. 1
  2032. 1
  2033. 1
  2034. 1
  2035. 1
  2036. 1
  2037. 1
  2038. 1
  2039. 1
  2040. 1
  2041. 1
  2042. 1
  2043. 1
  2044. 1
  2045. 1
  2046. 1
  2047. 1
  2048. 1
  2049. 1
  2050. 1
  2051. 1
  2052. 1
  2053. 1
  2054. 1
  2055. 1
  2056. 1
  2057. 1
  2058. 1
  2059. 1
  2060. 1
  2061. 1
  2062. 1
  2063. 1
  2064. 1
  2065. 1
  2066. 1
  2067. 1
  2068. 1
  2069. 1
  2070. 1
  2071. 1
  2072. 1
  2073. 1
  2074. 1
  2075. 1
  2076. 1
  2077. 1
  2078. 1
  2079. 1
  2080. 1
  2081. 1
  2082. 1
  2083. 1
  2084. 1
  2085. 1
  2086. 1
  2087. 1
  2088. 1
  2089. 1
  2090. 1
  2091. 1
  2092. 1
  2093. 1
  2094. 1
  2095. 1
  2096. 1
  2097. 1
  2098. 1
  2099. 1
  2100. 1
  2101. 1
  2102. 1
  2103. 1
  2104. 1
  2105. 1
  2106. 1
  2107. 1
  2108. 1
  2109. 1
  2110. 1
  2111. 1
  2112. 1
  2113. 1
  2114. 1
  2115. 1
  2116. 1
  2117. 1
  2118. 1
  2119. 1
  2120. 1
  2121. 1
  2122. 1
  2123. 1
  2124. 1
  2125. 1
  2126. 1
  2127. 1
  2128. 1
  2129. 1
  2130. 1
  2131. 1
  2132. 1
  2133. 1
  2134. 1
  2135. 1
  2136. 1
  2137. 1
  2138. 1
  2139. 1
  2140. 1
  2141. 1
  2142. 1
  2143. 1
  2144. 1
  2145. 1
  2146. 1
  2147. 1
  2148. 1
  2149. 1
  2150. 1
  2151. 1
  2152. 1
  2153. 1
  2154. 1
  2155. 1
  2156. 1
  2157. 1
  2158. 1
  2159. 1
  2160. 1
  2161. 1
  2162. 1
  2163. 1
  2164.  @christopherbong6639  It's a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions against Chyna. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  2165. 1
  2166. 1
  2167. 1
  2168. 1
  2169. 1
  2170. 1
  2171. 1
  2172. 1
  2173. 1
  2174. 1
  2175. 1
  2176. 1
  2177. 1
  2178. 1
  2179. 1
  2180. 1
  2181. 1
  2182. 1
  2183. 1
  2184. 1
  2185. 1
  2186. 1
  2187. 1
  2188. 1
  2189. 1
  2190. 1
  2191. 1
  2192. 1
  2193. 1
  2194. 1
  2195. 1
  2196. 1
  2197. 1
  2198. 1
  2199. 1
  2200.  @DanielSMatthews  Australia (26.1 million population, 2022) should be compared to South Korea (51.6 million population, 2022) SK = $1.811 trillion USD (2021) AU = $1.553 trillion USD (2021) The South Koreans are giving Elon Musk a headache. Why is Australia's GDP so high? Australia's US$7.3 trillion financial sector includes the world's fifth-largest pool of pension assets. From GPAS__2021 pdf Pension (mandated nanny state saving funds) vs GDP ratio for 2021 Five Eyes/Five Passport Group, Australia, $2,333 billion, 174.8% (CPTPP member, Nordic model), Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (USMCA, CPTPP member, Nordic model) United Kingdom, $3,564 billion, 135.1% (CPTPP member in July 2023, Nordic model) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (USMCA member) (I don't have data for NZ) Notice the Five Eyes group has similar pension assets to GDP ratio results Large-scale mandated savings funds enable the government to issue government bonds and large-scale bond buyer markets! EU Finland, $279 billion, 104.3% (Nordic model) France, $166 billion, 6.5% Germany, $548 billion, 14.5% Italy, $231 billion, 12.5% <----- PIIGS Netherlands, $1,900 billion, 214.4%, (Nordic model) Ireland, $197 billion, 49.4% <----- PIIGS Spain, $44 billion, 3.6% <----- PIIGS The EU lacks strategic savings coordination. Non-EU, Europe Switzerland, $1,163 billion, 164.3% (Nordic model) North America Mexico, $259 billion, 24.9% (USMCA, CPTPP member,) Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (USMCA, CPTPP member, Nordic model) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (USMCA member) South America Brazil, $195 billion,14.3% Chile, $243 billion, 99.2% (CPTPP member) East Asia, South East Asia China, $285 billion, 1.9% Hong Kong, $199 billion, 58.3% Japan, $3,613 billion, 73.6% (CPTPP member) South Korea, $968 billion, 61.0% Malaysia, $279 billion, 83.0% (CPTPP member) South-Central Asia India, $184 billion, 7.1%
    1
  2201. 1
  2202. 1
  2203. 1
  2204. 1
  2205. 1
  2206. 1
  2207. 1
  2208. 1
  2209. 1
  2210. 1
  2211. 1
  2212. 1
  2213. 1
  2214. 1
  2215. 1
  2216. 1
  2217. 1
  2218. 1
  2219. 1
  2220. 1
  2221. 1
  2222. 1
  2223. 1
  2224.  @guhad0108  http://www.businessinsider.com/bnd-report-on-saudi-arabias-power-struggle-2015-12 Germany's intelligence agency says Saudi Arabia's 'game of thrones' risks tearing the Middle East apart. From https://www.reuters.com/article/us-opec-meeting-shale/inside-opec-room-naimi-declares-price-war-on-u-s-shale-oil-idUSKCN0JC1GK20141128 Saudi Arabia declares war on US shale oil. What do we have here? Another attempt to make the US to be Saudi Arabia's armed proxy? http://www.businessinsider.com/turkey-and-saudi-arabia-collaborating-in-syria-2015-5?IR=T Sunni dominated Turkey and Saudi Arabia are officially collaborating to bring down Assad in Syria https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2014/12/12/why-turkeys-president-wants-to-revive-the-language-of-the-ottoman-empire/ Turkey wants to revive the Ottoman Empire , hence they have their goals and objectives. https://www.rt.com/op-edge/270280-wahhabism-terrorism-isis-islam/ Wahhabism: Religious deviance and fountainhead of radicalism & extremism. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-19/maajid-nawaz-on-being-drawn-into-the-world-of-islamist-extremism/7180614 From 'exporting extremism' to challenging those trying to impose Islam on others. When rival German/American/Australian western media vs Russian media has similar conclusions that a certain Middle East country or countries playing 'game of thrones', then there's a problem. China, Russia, and the West are happily selling weapons to these Islamic regimes. "Old world" issues did NOT disappear i.e. "there's nothing new under the sun".
    1
  2225. 1
  2226. 1
  2227. 1
  2228. 1
  2229. 1
  2230. 1
  2231. 1
  2232. 1
  2233. 1
  2234. 1
  2235. 1
  2236. 1
  2237. 1
  2238. 1
  2239. 1
  2240. 1
  2241. 1
  2242. 1
  2243. 1
  2244. 1
  2245. 1
  2246. 1
  2247. 1
  2248. 1
  2249. 1
  2250. 1
  2251. 1
  2252. 1
  2253. 1
  2254. 1
  2255. 1
  2256. 1
  2257. 1
  2258. 1
  2259. 1
  2260. 1
  2261. 1
  2262. 1
  2263. 1
  2264. 1
  2265. 1
  2266. 1
  2267. 1
  2268. 1
  2269. 1
  2270. 1
  2271. 1
  2272. 1
  2273. 1
  2274. 1
  2275. 1
  2276. 1
  2277. 1
  2278. 1
  2279. 1
  2280. 1
  2281. 1
  2282. 1
  2283. 1
  2284. 1
  2285. 1
  2286. 1
  2287. 1
  2288. 1
  2289. 1
  2290. 1
  2291. 1
  2292. 1
  2293. 1
  2294. 1
  2295. 1
  2296. 1
  2297. 1
  2298. 1
  2299. 1
  2300. 1
  2301. 1
  2302. 1
  2303. 1
  2304. 1
  2305. 1
  2306. 1
  2307. 1
  2308. 1
  2309. 1
  2310. 1
  2311. 1
  2312. 1
  2313. 1
  2314. 1
  2315. 1
  2316. 1
  2317. 1
  2318.  @paultsjan6047  >And what has Russia and China got to do with Australia?!?! Both China and Russia have ganged up on Australia's and New Zealand's Antarctica marine park plan which caused Australia to enlist help from the EU and New Zealand to enlist US help. >. So who is thinking of attacking whom with B-21 Raider from the US??? Your argument is hypocritical to accept China's superior military hardware while denying it to Australia. Australia has the sovereign to right purchase military hardware. Feelings are useless without firepower to back them. Furthermore, Australia needs to replace the long-range F-111C fighter-bomber fleet. >And what is so bad about communism or socialism?!?! That's a red herring and outside scope of the this video topic. >The US has been renouncing other political system like Socialism . False narrative. The US accepts Nordic's capitalist-socialist hybrid model. For post-WW2 Japan, Douglas Macarthur also executed land reform by shifting significant wealthy landlords' lands to the workers with private land title transfers. Land Reform in Postwar Japan As part of the democratization of Japan after World War II, Japanese leaders and Occupation authorities worked together to carry out land reform. It is regarded as one of the most successful of the Occupation-era reforms, and has become the model for land reform in other countries. The purpose of land reform was to reduce the wide gap between absentee landlords who owned agricultural land but did not farm it themselves, and tenant farmers who rented the land in exchange for giving the landlord a high proportion of the crop. The land reform laws were intended to limit the amount of farm land one household could own to about the amount of land that one family could farm themselves, without outside labor. The government forced absentee landlords to sell all their land to the government. Farmers were allowed to own a small amount of farm land that they could rent out to others ( 2.5 acres or one hectare in most parts of Japan, and 10 acres or 4 hectares in Hokkaido), and had to sell any excess to the government. The government then sold this land, usually to the tenant who had been farming it. The result greatly improved the living conditions of farmers. Idealogical basis: The West has its own idealogy on land reform based on the family unit and private ownership as its core idealogy. This is Macarthur's socialism with private land title transfers. VS Marxist = land reform transfer to the state, no private land title transfer to the workers. Marxist socialism is fake since it doesn't transfer ownership to families.
    1
  2319. 1
  2320. 1
  2321.  @paultsjan6047  The US internal issues are US matters to solve, but China's "old world" issues have affected multiple countries' territorial integrity. These old-world issues existed before the US being a superpower. > Australia has a chequered past of human rights abuses and what the white Australians has done to the First Australians. That's a useless argument when the Australian population has voted First Australians into political offices. Furthermore, there's an ancient virus lurking in remote Australia that affects thousands of Aboriginal adults and this ancient virus is related to HIV( i.e. HTLV-1) and reduces an adult's life span. It's a racist argument to separate Australians by their racial group i.e. your argument is a racial segregation argument, hence you should look in the mirror since your own racial segregation argument failed the race neutrality test. >China do not colonized any countries in the world FALSE. China land grabs and plays for keeps in the current human generation! CPC thinks communism cleanly slates its colonial past, but different languages in China are echoes of different ethnic groups and kingdoms. For the current human generation, China has territorial disputes with other countries e.g. India, Japan, Vietnam, and the Philippines. Disputes in the South China Sea region The nine-dash line area claimed by the Republic of China (1912–1949), later the People's Republic of China (PRC), which covers most of the South China Sea and overlaps with the exclusive economic zone claims of Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan, and Vietnam. Maritime boundary along the Vietnamese coast between the PRC, Taiwan, and Vietnam. Maritime boundary north of Borneo between the PRC, Malaysia, Brunei, Philippines, and Taiwan. Islands, reefs, banks and shoals in the South China Sea, including the Paracel Islands, Pratas Island and the Vereker Banks, Macclesfield Bank, Scarborough Shoal and the Spratly Islands between the PRC, Taiwan, and Vietnam, and parts of the area also contested by Malaysia and the Philippines. Maritime boundary in the waters north of the Natuna Islands between the PRC, Indonesia, Taiwan[20] and Vietnam.[21] Maritime boundary off the coast of Palawan and Luzon between the PRC, the Philippines, and Taiwan. Maritime boundary, land territory, and the islands of Sabah, including Ambalat, between Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines. Maritime boundary and islands in the Luzon Strait between the PRC, the Philippines, and Taiwan.
    1
  2322. 1
  2323. 1
  2324. 1
  2325. 1
  2326. 1
  2327. 1
  2328. 1
  2329.  @rossevans1774  Note that the US ordered Japan's highly enriched fissile material to be transferred to the US. JP's ability to generate 2 tons of highly enriched fissile material within a year has closed the gap between non-nuclear status and nuclear-state status to a few months. For a total war situation, NPT (Non-Proliferation Treaty) is rendered void i.e. Article X exit clause from NPT. During a total war situation, an advanced country without nuclear weapons and without highly enriched fissile material, it would take at least 2 years to develop a nuclear bomb. Keep in mind, UK and US marine micro-nuclear reactors are designed with highly enriched fissile material. Australia's direction with the AUKUS project is to close the gap between non-nuclear status and nuclear-state status. Budapest Memorandum's impeding failure will add extra arguments for independent nuclear weapons for smaller countries. The US has made agreements with countries such as SK, JP, AUS, and TW to halt independent nuclear weapons programs in exchange for security assurances. The US and UK signed Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum that traded Ukraine's nuclear weapons for security assurances. Russia has exited Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum. France and China have signed a watered-down Budapest Memorandum. US EXIT (due to Republican isolationism) from Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum has a negative outcome for any US allies being in the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). Like Ukraine''s Budapest Memorandum, Australia does NOT have a NATO Article V quality defense treaty with the US. Feelings are useless without firepower to back them.
    1
  2330. 1
  2331. 1
  2332. 1
  2333. 1
  2334. 1
  2335. 1
  2336. 1
  2337. 1
  2338. 1
  2339. 1
  2340. 1
  2341. 1
  2342. 1
  2343. 1
  2344. 1
  2345. 1
  2346. 1
  2347. 1
  2348. 1
  2349. 1
  2350. 1
  2351. 1
  2352. 1
  2353. 1
  2354. 1
  2355. 1
  2356. 1
  2357. 1
  2358. 1
  2359. 1
  2360. 1
  2361. 1
  2362. 1
  2363. 1
  2364. 1
  2365. 1
  2366. 1
  2367. 1
  2368. 1
  2369. 1
  2370. 1
  2371. 1
  2372. 1
  2373. 1
  2374. 1
  2375. 1
  2376. 1
  2377. 1
  2378. @Seawolf Luck is NOT involved with it READ abc.net.au/news/2020-07-04/victoria-coronavirus-hotel-quarantine-leaves-states-vulnerable/12420970 Quoting from the article A mandatory 14-day quarantine period for travellers returning home from overseas is based on national guidelines, but how those 14 days play out varies across states. A person who tests positive for coronavirus while in hotel quarantine doesn't need to return a negative result before they're allowed to leave, under the national guidelines. In NSW, every returned traveller must be tested at 10 days. In Victoria, people are offered tests on days 3 and 11. Mandatory testing was only introduced last weekend for NSW, and in Victoria the rules have recently been changed so if people decline testing they have to quarantine for a further 10 days. ------------------ NSW is a MUST. VIC is an OFFER. For Victoria's second COVDi-19 wave, Victora is a soft touch. ------------------ From abc.net.au/news/2020-07-04/victoria-coronavirus-hotel-quarantine-leaves-states-vulnerable/12420970 Again, Quoting from the article How is Victoria set up differently? Like other states, Victoria has strict quarantine rules where the person is forbidden from leaving the accommodation unless there is an emergency situation or an exemption based on compassionate grounds. But human error and alleged misconduct has been the main cause of resurgence in COVID-19 cases in Victoria, according to Mr Andrews. Victoria's state-run hotel quarantine has used private security contractors to guard rooms — a process that is now changing after guards contracted the virus and spread it to the community. In NSW, travellers with a fever or who are displaying COVID-19 symptoms are referred to a "Health Hotel", managed by NSW Health. Travellers who are well and have no symptoms are taken to hotels run by NSW Police. Private security guards may assist, but NSW Health says they are all given infection control training. ---------------- Luck is NOT involved with it
    1
  2379. 1
  2380. 1
  2381. 1
  2382. @Seawolf >Furthermore, VIC announced mandatory testing a day after the federal government greenlit this and said that states were allowed to do that. From theage.com.au/politics/victoria/troops-offered-from-start-of-hotel-quarantine-scheme-but-never-taken-up-20200915-p55vyg.html Recordings of meetings that set up Victoria's failed hotel quarantine program reveal Australian Defence Force troops were on offer to the Victorian government from the start but were never taken up by the state’s Emergency Management Commissioner Andrew Crisp. _Documents supplied by the Morrison government to the state inquiry into quarantine hotels on Tuesday also showed almost 500 ADF staff were working in hotels and at airports in NSW and Queensland at the same time Victoria told the army it didn’t need help_. Victoria’s decision to rely on poorly trained private security guards in its quarantine hotels – instead of a mix of police, soldiers and private guards as other states did more successfully – allowed coronavirus to escape into the community The federal government documents provided to the inquiry on Tuesday included an email with the subject heading "assistance re hotel stay security". The email was sent in April by the boss of the Commonwealth public service, Phil Gaetjens, to Chris Eccles, his Victorian public service equivalent. Mr Gaetjens wrote: "The Commonwealth would be willing to assist Victoria in a similar way [to NSW] if you wanted to reconsider your model" and use the ADF. Mr Eccles replied: "Thanks Phil." ----- Victoria's COVID-19 second wave is on Victoria's Labor state government!
    1
  2383. 1
  2384. 1
  2385. 1
  2386. 1
  2387. 1
  2388. 1
  2389. 1
  2390. 1
  2391. 1
  2392. 1
  2393. 1
  2394. 1
  2395. 1
  2396. 1
  2397. 1
  2398. 1
  2399.  @andrewmeiklem5098  Penny Wong doesn't acknowledge the following CCP trade restrictions! Note that China has a "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" which is known as CCP's protectionist list. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  2400. 1
  2401. 1
  2402. 1
  2403. 1
  2404. 1
  2405. 1
  2406. 1
  2407. 1
  2408. 1
  2409. 1
  2410. 1
  2411. 1
  2412. 1
  2413. 1
  2414. 1
  2415. 1
  2416. 1
  2417. 1
  2418. 1
  2419. 1
  2420. 1
  2421. 1
  2422. 1
  2423. 1
  2424. 1
  2425. 1
  2426. 1
  2427. 1
  2428. 1
  2429. 1
  2430. 1
  2431. 1
  2432. 1
  2433. 1
  2434. 1
  2435. 1
  2436.  @gore1089  You don't know shit. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  2437. 1
  2438. 1
  2439. 1
  2440. 1
  2441. 1
  2442. 1
  2443. 1
  2444. 1
  2445. 1
  2446. 1
  2447. 1
  2448.  @KingOfZamunda  >one party instigated the euromaidan coup That's a FALSE narrative from Putin. Date: Jan. 7, 2010 Yanukovych: Ukraine will remain a neutral state. "It’s certain that Ukraine was and will be non-aligned state… We strive neither to join NATO nor the [CIS]CSTO [Collective Security Treaty Organization]. We’ll maintain a neutral status," Yanukovych said in an interview with the Komsomolskaya Pravda in Ukraine newspaper. -------- The trigger for Euromaidan was Yanukovych initiated non-neutrality policies such as joining a trade block instead of executing Switzerland-style neutrality. UK leaving the EU and joining CPTPP proves freedom of association. Before Euromaidan, Russia, however, has successfully used political and economic leverage to dissuade Ukraine from signing the E.U. deal. In the months prior to the Vilnius summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a trade war with Kiev, blocking nearly all imports from Ukraine and cutting energy supplies to the country. In turn, this reduced Ukrainian exports by 25 percent and shrank the economy by 1.5 percent. Some trade background for the context From Tradebarrier Index (lower score = less trade barriers) New Zealand's tariff score is 2.92 Australia's tariff score is 3.03 UK's tariff score is 3.94 (after Brexit) Japan's tariff score is 4.05 US's tariff score is 4.54 Germany's tariff score is 4.88 EU's tariff score is 4.88 Russia's tariff score is 6.16 <-------- China's tariff score is 6.8 <------ Russia wants to maintain its higher trade protectionist policies. ------ Victoria Nuland herself doesn't have the power, but about 73% of the MPs—voted to "remove Viktor Yanukovych from the post of president of Ukraine" has the power. Don't assume Ukraine's president has absolute power when 73% of the MPs have voted to "remove Viktor Yanukovych from the post of president of Ukraine". Ukraine Constitution 1991, Article 17, disallows foreign military bases after 2017. According to former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, Ukraine's constitution forbids the country from hosting foreign military bases after 2017. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1991, Article 17 when Yanukovych renewed foreign base lease with Russia. In 2018, President Petro Poroshenko's constitution amendment allowed temporary foreign military bases. LOL
    1
  2449. 1
  2450. 1
  2451.  @wanted001  You're not a real Aussie. A real Aussie will have Australia 1st mindset e.g. Australian freedom of navigation, obtaining nuclear power generation for itself, Australian interest in Antarctica, Australian interest in Oceania, advocate reciprocal trade policies. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  2452. 1
  2453. 1
  2454. 1
  2455. 1
  2456. 1
  2457. 1
  2458. 1
  2459. 1
  2460. 1
  2461. 1
  2462. 1
  2463. 1
  2464. 1
  2465. 1
  2466. 1
  2467. 1
  2468. 1
  2469. 1
  2470. 1
  2471. 1
  2472. 1
  2473. 1
  2474. 1
  2475. 1
  2476. 1
  2477. 1
  2478. 1
  2479. 1
  2480. 1
  2481. 1
  2482. 1
  2483. 1
  2484. 1
  2485. 1
  2486. 1
  2487. 1
  2488. 1
  2489. 1
  2490. 1
  2491. 1
  2492. 1
  2493. 1
  2494. 1
  2495. 1
  2496. 1
  2497. 1
  2498. 1
  2499. 1
  2500. 1
  2501. 1
  2502. 1
  2503. 1
  2504. 1
  2505. 1
  2506. 1
  2507. 1
  2508. 1
  2509. 1
  2510.  @matthews1082  > the Indians of Indian subcontinent 1. For historical context, the dominant Han Mandarin language ethnic group has committed mass killings on other ethnic groups. Different languages in China are echos of different ethnic groups and kingdoms. The current CCP government inherited Imperial China's empire land area that is mostly intact. Xi Jinping's CCP government's arguments are based on Imperial China's, hence Imperial China 2.0 is reborn under the new emperor (chairman for life) Xi Jinping. Both CCP and Russian Federation inherited Imperial China's and Imperial Russia's colonial actions. Both nations think communism clean slates their colonial past. 2. British East India Company has been dismantled by the British government. The British government doesn't govern India, Canada, Australia, United States, New Zealand and 'etc'. The current British government did NOT inherit the British Empire! Your argument is hypocritical and it's NOT the same when the British government does NOT govern the non-existing British Empire while Imperial China's empire still exists under CCP. Your argument is hypocritical and it's NOT the same when the British government does NOT govern the non-existing British Empire while Russian Federation inherited MOST of the Russian Empire's land area. Communism did NOT wipe the Russian Empire's colonial past hence why the breakup of the USSR reveals Russian Empire being a fake country. Your historical context arguments are useless AND hypocritical for the current human generation.
    1
  2511. 1
  2512. 1
  2513. 1
  2514. 1
  2515. 1
  2516. 1
  2517.  @matthews1082  >Well Ukraine had been a part of the Russian Empire Ukraine was part of Poland since the Ukrainian language has Polish influence, the Polish influence with the Ukrainian language is the major separation from the Russian language. From 1804 until the Ukrainian War of Independence, the Ukrainian language was banned from schools in the Russian Empire, of which the biggest part of Ukraine (Central, Eastern, and Southern) was a part at the time. During the reign of Catherine II of Russia, the Cossack Hetmanate's autonomy was progressively destroyed. After several earlier attempts, the office of hetman was finally abolished by the Russian government in 1764, and his functions were assumed by the Little Russian Collegium, thus fully incorporating the Hetmanate into the Russian Empire. On May 7, 1775, Empress Catherine II issued a direct order that the Zaporozhian Sich was to be destroyed. On June 5, 1775, Russian artillery and infantry surrounded the Sich and razed it to the ground. The Russian troops disarmed the Cossacks, and the treasury archives were confiscated. The Koshovyi Otaman, Petro Kalnyshevsky, was arrested and incarcerated in exile at Solovetsky Monastery. This marked the end of the Zaporozhian Cossacks. ---- 1. 1863–1864 January uprising, Russian Empire crushed Polish, Lithuanian, and Ukrainian insurgents uprising. 2. Soviet–Ukrainian War occurred between 1917 to 1921, a war between the Ukrainian People's Republic vs the Bolsheviks i.e. Ukrainian Soviet Republic and Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (modern-day Russian Federation). 3. 2014, Russo-Ukrainian War. March 1, 2014, the Federation Council of the Russian Federation unanimously adopted a resolution to petition Russian President Vladimir Putin to use military force in Ukraine. Ukrainian People's Republic is the modern-day Ukraine. These are unresolved "old world" issues that existed before the US being a superpower.
    1
  2518. 1
  2519. 1
  2520. 1
  2521. 1
  2522. 1
  2523. 1
  2524. 1
  2525. 1
  2526. 1
  2527. 1
  2528. 1
  2529. 1
  2530. 1
  2531. 1
  2532. 1
  2533. 1
  2534. 1
  2535. 1
  2536. 1
  2537. 1
  2538. 1
  2539. 1
  2540. 1
  2541. 1
  2542. 1
  2543. 1
  2544. 1
  2545. 1
  2546. 1
  2547. 1
  2548. 1
  2549. 1
  2550. 1
  2551. 1
  2552. 1
  2553. 1
  2554. 1
  2555. 1
  2556. 1
  2557. 1
  2558. 1
  2559. 1
  2560. 1
  2561. 1
  2562. 1
  2563. 1
  2564. Note that China has a "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" which is known as CCP's protectionist list. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. ------------------------ 1. ASIO already caught Huawei spy software. 2. China attempts to encircle Australia via the south of the second island chain. 3. China went against Australia's interest in Antarctica. Australia enlisted the EU's help while NZ enlisted US help against the Russia-China team. 4. China's anti-foreign Market Access Negative List resulted in Australia's reciprocal investment restrictions. ------------------------ Note that China has a "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" which is known as CCP's protectionist list. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  2565. 1
  2566. 1
  2567. 1
  2568. 1
  2569. 1
  2570. 1
  2571. 1
  2572. 1
  2573. 1
  2574. 1
  2575. 1
  2576. 1
  2577. 1
  2578. 1
  2579. 1
  2580. 1
  2581. 1
  2582. 1
  2583. 1
  2584. 1
  2585. 1
  2586. 1
  2587. 1
  2588. 1
  2589. 1
  2590. 1
  2591. 1
  2592. 1
  2593. 1
  2594. 1
  2595. 1
  2596. 1
  2597. 1
  2598. 1
  2599. 1
  2600. 1
  2601. 1
  2602. 1
  2603. 1
  2604. 1
  2605. 1
  2606. 1
  2607. 1
  2608. 1
  2609. 1
  2610. 1
  2611. 1
  2612. 1
  2613.  Hans Otto Kroeger Kaethler  China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  2614. 1
  2615. 1
  2616. 1
  2617. 1
  2618. 1
  2619. 1
  2620. 1
  2621. 1
  2622. 1
  2623.  Hans Otto Kroeger Kaethler  >USA is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies. DON'T MIX UP WITH TARIFF ON PRODUCTS AND INVESTMENT PROTESTIONIST ISSUES. China Negative List 2020 Let's focus Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. China has invested in mining companies in Australia and the US. From mining.com/web/china-locking-critical-resources-uss-backyard/ Rare earth robbery In 2016 Molycorp’s Mountain Pass Mine in California was shut down because it couldn’t compete with the low rare earth oxide prices coming out of China – which has cornered the market in REOs with about 95% of the world’s production. The timing was bad because Molycorp had just invested $1.25 billion to expand the light rare earths facility. It was forced into bankruptcy, until last summer when an investor group with ties to the Chinese government bought the mine for $20.5 million, beating out American bidders including ERP Strategic Minerals. https://graphitepublications.com/will-chinas-outrageous-rare-earth-monopoly-persist/ China's rare earth near-monopoly was built on SOE (state-own enterprise) which driven private competitors from the market. Second, importing countries have been concerned with the agglutination of Chinese mining companies in what appears to be a calculated move to make China’s monopoly even more monopolistic. Most prominently, Bao Gang Rare Earth (BGRE), a state-owned REE company forcibly merged with four smaller companies and numerous smaller companies were shut down to create a monopoly in Northern China which accounts for two-thirds of China’s output. Moreover, China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) decreed minimum production thresholds for domestic companies in early August 2012, essentially truncating the smallest REE producers as well as with 20% of China’s rare earths capacity. Third, Chinese companies have determinedly acted to protect their monopoly by buying potential international rivals. Lynas Corp., an Australian company displayed plans to open a new REE mine when in May 2009, a company owned by the Chinese government swooped in with a $366 million bid and bought a majority stake in it. --------- Australian OR American mining companies CAN NOT DO THE SAME THING IN CHINA It's a no-brainer when countries like Australia impose restrict investment reciprocity against China. GTFO.
    1
  2624. 1
  2625. 1
  2626. 1
  2627. 1
  2628. 1
  2629. 1
  2630. 1
  2631. 1
  2632. 1
  2633. 1
  2634. 1
  2635. 1
  2636. 1
  2637. 1
  2638. 1
  2639. 1
  2640. 1
  2641. 1
  2642. 1
  2643. 1
  2644.  @paynelesor3940  >Higher incarceration rates per capita Do the crime, do the time. In general, East Asian teens focus on school studies. >higher rates of premature death Ancient virus lurking in remote Australia, affecting thousands of Aboriginal adults In a brightly lit lab in the outback town of Alice Springs, researchers have been inspecting vials of blood infected with an ancient virus that has lurked in Australia for thousands of years. It is called T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1— or HTLV-1 — and Australia has the highest levels in the world. A distant relative of HIV, it is a blood-borne virus that can be sexually transmitted or passed from mother to child. The virus can lead to inflammation of the skin, eyes and lungs. "You're also at risk of developing things like leukemia, so blood cancer, and becoming disabled through spinal cord injuries," researcher Joel Liddle said. "Once your pro-viral load is high, you're at a high risk of poor health." Researchers said, in most cases, leukaemia caused by the virus could be "rapidly fatal". Researchers from the Baker Institute for Heart and Diabetes in Alice Springs estimated 45 percent of Indigenous adults in central Australia had HTLV-1 . "In remote Australia, it's so out of sight, out of mind with a lot of things, health is just one of those things," Mr Liddle said. One of the difficulties with this virus is that most of those who have HTLV-1, don't know they have it, and a vast number of Aboriginal communities have never been tested. "I think there's probably confusion and a little bit of anger, too. People [question] why haven't they been told about this," Mr Liddle said. "There's a lot of reasons to breastfeed. Prolonged breastfeeding may be something that could be addressed but that's up to Aboriginal people to decide." For Mr Liddle, an Arrernte man, a response to high rates of HTLV-1 demands a delicate approach, with intensive education work delivered in Aboriginal languages. "I think there's a lot of work to do, certainly I think at the moment, what I see as our main thing is to engage sensitively around the issues because we're dealing with people's health, and all the things and complexities that are going on in remote communities, so we have to be really mindful of that." ------ This ancient virus is related to HIV( i.e. HTLV-1) and reduces an adult's life span. Aboriginals have the highest HTLV-1 infection rates in the world. To fix this issue, non-Aboriginal R&D will be needed to cure this ancient issue, promote safe sex culture (i.e. change culture), and practise monogamy (i.e. change culture).
    1
  2645. 1
  2646. 1
  2647. 1
  2648. 1
  2649. 1
  2650. 1
  2651. 1
  2652. 1
  2653. 1
  2654. 1
  2655. 1
  2656. 1
  2657. 1
  2658. 1
  2659. 1
  2660. 1
  2661. 1
  2662. 1
  2663. 1
  2664. 1
  2665. 1
  2666. 1
  2667. 1
  2668. 1
  2669. 1
  2670. 1
  2671. 1
  2672. 1
  2673. https://www.forbes.com/sites/douglasbulloch/2016/10/12/protectionism-may-be-rising-around-the-world-but-in-china-it-never-went-away/#5dc3f5df73da Protectionism May Be Rising Around The World, But In China It Never Went Away Promises unkept? Since joining the WTO in 2001, China has repeatedly insisted that it will live up to those undertakings made on entry. In particular, the use of currency manipulation has been identified by the US as a breech of the commitment to end price controls for the purposes of protecting domestic industries. This became a major political issue from 2005 onwards, and has only recently subsided because it is assumed that the RMB is slightly overvalued on the market. Nevertheless, for years it was deliberate policy for the PBoC to accumulate US Dollars and suppress the exchange rate for the RMB, resulting in exactly the price distortions China had committed to eliminate in 2001, and fuelling an enormous trade surplus with the US, which persists and expands to this day. Furthermore TRIPS implementation has been given some effect on paper, but has made little progress when it comes to 'enforcement.' This is (according to the WTO) as recently as February 2015, fully 14 years after TRIPS was supposed to be already in effect. The US Trade Representative produces an annual report to Congress on China's WTO compliance which leaves little room to conclude they have so far lived up to their accession commitments. The most recent several-hundred-page document - produced in December 2015 - recites a long list of small measures, committees established, announcements made and new administrative complications faced, all continuing disputes over an agreement theoretically in effect since 2001. Although, therefore, protectionism is rising around the world, it is also true to say that existing practices of protectionism have not fallen in the way that they should have since China's accession to the WTO in 2001. Because of this lack of progress in easing trade, the extended period of currency manipulation, the lack of observance of TRIPS and the sheer administrative resistance exporters face when trying to get their products into China, we now face of world of highly unbalanced trade, and rising mistrust. And it is this that is leading to rising protectionism; the simple fact that it never went away. ----------------------
    1
  2674. 1
  2675. 1
  2676. 1
  2677. 1
  2678. 1
  2679. 1
  2680. 1
  2681. 1
  2682. 1
  2683. 1
  2684. 1
  2685. 1
  2686. 1
  2687. 1
  2688. 1
  2689. 1
  2690. 1
  2691. 1
  2692. 1
  2693. 1
  2694. 1
  2695. 1
  2696. 1
  2697. 1
  2698. 1
  2699. 1
  2700. 1
  2701. 1
  2702. 1
  2703. 1
  2704. 1
  2705. 1
  2706. 1
  2707. 1
  2708. 1
  2709. 1
  2710. 1
  2711. 1
  2712. 1
  2713. 1
  2714. 1
  2715. 1
  2716. 1
  2717. 1
  2718. 1
  2719. 1
  2720. 1
  2721. 1
  2722. 1
  2723. 1
  2724. 1
  2725. 1
  2726. 1
  2727. 1
  2728. 1
  2729. 1
  2730. 1
  2731. 1
  2732. 1
  2733. 1
  2734. 1
  2735. 1
  2736. 1
  2737. 1
  2738. 1
  2739. 1
  2740. 1
  2741. 1
  2742. 1
  2743. 1
  2744.  @chrisgriffiths2533  Information from Aug 2020 Queensland renewable energy projects committed or contracted since 2015. FAR NORTH & NORTH WEST 1 Lakeland Solar & Storage: 10.8MW 2 Kidston Pumped Hydro Storage Project: 250MW 3 Kidston Solar One: 50MW 4 Hughenden Solar Farm: 18MW 5 Kennedy Energy Park: 15MW 6 Kennedy Energy Park: 43.2MW 7 Mount Emerald Wind Farm: 180.45MW 8 Tableland Mill upgrade: 24MW NORTH EAST 9 Clare Solar Farm: 100MW 10 Haughton Solar Farm: 100MW 11 Clermont Solar Farm: 75MW 12 Rugby Run Solar Farm: 65MW 13 Middlemount Solar Farm: 34MW 14 Ross River Solar Farm: 116MW 15 Sun Metals: 124.4MW 16 Daydream Solar Farm: 150MW 17 Hamilton Solar Farm: 57.5MW 18 Hayman Solar Farm: 50MW 19 Collinsville Solar Farm: 42.5MW 20 Whitsunday Solar Farm: 57.5MW CENTRAL 21 Emerald Solar Park: 68MW 22 Lilyvale Solar Farm: 100MW 23 Barcaldine Solar Farm: 20MW 24 Longreach Solar Farm: 15MW DARLING DOWNS & SOUTH WEST 25 MacIntyre CleanCo Wind Farm: 103MW 26 MacIntyre Wind Farm: 923MW 27 Warwick Solar Farm: 64MW 28 Oakey 1 Solar Farm: 25MW 29 Yarranlea solar QLD: 100MW 30 Maryrorough Solar Farm: 34MW 31 Oakey 2 Solar Farm: 55MW 32 Western Downs Solar Farm: 400MW 33 Baking Board solar farm: 19.9MW 34 Darling Downs Solar Farm: 108.5MW 35 Coopers Gap Wind Farm: 453MW 36 Gangarri Solar Farm: 120MW WIDE BAY 37 Childers Solar Farm: 56MW 38 Susan River Solar Farm: 75MW SOUTH EAST 39 Brisbane Airport Solar System: 6MW 40 Sunshine Coast Solar Farm: 15MW Collectively, these are small installations when compared to the NT-Singapore solar project's 20 gigawatts (20,000 MW) solar and 36-42 gigawatt hours of mega battery storage. The NT-Singapore project will attempt to power 5.56 million populated city-state's 15 percent of their electricity needs from 2028.
    1
  2745. 1
  2746. 1
  2747. 1
  2748. 1
  2749. 1
  2750. 1
  2751. 1
  2752. 1
  2753. 1
  2754. 1
  2755. 1
  2756. 1
  2757. 1
  2758. 1
  2759. 1
  2760. 1
  2761. 1
  2762. 1
  2763. 1
  2764. 1
  2765. 1
  2766. 1
  2767. 1
  2768. 1
  2769. 1
  2770. 1
  2771. 1
  2772. 1
  2773. 1
  2774. 1
  2775. 1
  2776. 1
  2777. 1
  2778. 1
  2779. 1
  2780. 1
  2781. 1
  2782. 1
  2783. 1
  2784. 1
  2785. 1
  2786. 1
  2787. 1
  2788. 1
  2789. 1
  2790. 1
  2791. 1
  2792. 1
  2793. 1
  2794. 1
  2795. 1
  2796. 1
  2797. 1
  2798. 1
  2799. 1
  2800. 1
  2801. 1
  2802. 1
  2803. 1
  2804. 1
  2805. 1
  2806. 1
  2807. 1
  2808. 1
  2809. 1
  2810. 1
  2811. Russian_conquest_of_Central_Asia 1718-1847: Gaining control of the Kazakh Steppe Fall of the Kazakh Khanate (1847) 1839: Failed attack on Khiva. See Khivan campaign of 1839. 1847–1853: The Syr Darya line 1847–1864: Down the eastern side 1864–1868: Kokand and Bukhara subdued, Russian conquest of Bukhara 1875–1876: Liquidation of the Kokand Khanate 1873: The conquest of Khiva 1879–1885: Turkmenistan: Geok Tepe, Merv and Panjdeh 1879: Lomakin's defeat at Geok Tepe 1884: The annexation of Merv 1885: Expansion stopped at Panjdeh 1872–1895: The Eastern Mountains 1867–1877: Yakub Beg 1871–1883: temporary occupation of Kulja 1893: Pamirs occupied Results speak themselves with Imperial Russia/Russian Federation having the largest land area in the world! -------------------- Grand Duchy of Moscow (1263–1547) 1368–1372 Lithuanian-Muscovite War 1376 Muscovite-Volga Bulgars war 1467–1469 Qasim War 1471 Battle of Shelon 1480 Great stand on the Ugra river 1478 Siege of Kazan 1492–1494 First Muscovite-Lithuanian War 1495–1497 Russo-Swedish War 1500–1503 Second Muscovite-Lithuanian War 1505–1507 Russo-Kazan War 1507–1508 Third Muscovite-Lithuanian War 1512–1522 Fourth Muscovite-Lithuanian War 1534–1537 Fifth Muscovite-Lithuanian War Tsardom of Russia (1547–1721) 1552 Siege of Kazan 1552–1556 Tatar Rebellion 1554–1557 Ivan the Terrible’s Swedish War 1556 Russian conquest of Astrakhan 1558–1583 Livonian War 1568–1570 Astrakhan Expedition 1570–1572 Ivan the Terrible’s Crimean War 1580–1762 Russian conquest of Siberia 1590–1595 Boris Godunov’s Swedish War 1606–1607 Bolotnikov Rebellion 1610–1617 Ingrian War 1632–1634 Smolensk War 1651–1653 Alexis I’s Persian War 1652–1689 Sino–Russian border conflicts 1654–1667 First Northern War 1656–1658 Second Northern War 1670–1671 Razin’s Rebellion 1676–1681 Feodor III’s Turkish War 1683–1700 Great Turkish War 1700–1721 Great Northern War 1704–1711 Third Bashkir Rebellion 1707–1708 Bulavin Rebellion 1717 Peter the Great’s Khivan War 1717–1847 Kazakh-Russian conflicts Russian Empire (1721–1917) 1722–1723 Persian Expedition of Peter the Great 1733–1738 War of the Polish Succession Rhineland 1735–1739 Russo-Austro-Turkish War 1735–1740 Fourth Bashkir Rebellion 1740–1748 War of the Austrian Succession 1756–1763 Seven Years' War 1768–1769 Koliivshchyna Rebellion 1768–1772 War of the Bar Confederation 1768–1774 Catherine the Great’s First Turkish War 1773–1775 Pugachev's Rebellion 1787–1792 Catherine the Great’s Second Turkish War 1788–1790 Catherine the Great’s Swedish War 1792 Catherine the Great’s Polish War, Second Partition of Poland 1794 Kościuszko Uprising, Third Partition of Poland 1796 Persian Expedition of Catherine the Great 1804–1813 Alexander I’s Persian War 1806–1812 Alexander I’s Turkish War 1808–1809 Finnish War 1817–1864 Caucasian War 1826–1828 Nicholas I’s Persian War 1828–1829 Nicholas I’s Turkish War 1830–1831 November uprising, crushed Polish uprising. 1839–1841 Second Turko-Egyptian War 1839–1895 Russian conquest of Central Asia 1863–1864 January uprising, crushed Polish, Lithuanian and Ukrainian insurgents uprising. 1899–1901 Boxer Rebellion, Results speak themselves with Imperial Russia/Russian Federation having the largest land area in the world! Soviet Union (1922–1991) 1924 August Uprising, Consolidation of Soviet rule in Georgian SSR 1924 Tatarbunary Uprising, Crushing of the Soviet-inspired rebellion. 1925–1926 Urtatagai conflict, 1929 Sino-Soviet conflict, USSR defeats China 1929 Red Army intervention in Afghanistan, USSR defeated. 1930 Red Army intervention in Afghanistan (1930), USSR defeats Basmachi. 1932–1941 Soviet–Japanese border conflicts, USSR defeats Imperial Japan. 1936–1939 Spanish Civil War, USSR-backed proxy has been defeated. 1937 Islamic Rebellion in Xinjiang, USSR's backed proxy defeats China. 1939 Invasion of Poland (Part of World War II), triggering WW2. Division of Polish territory between Third Reich, Soviet Union and Slovakia 1939–1940 Winter War (Part of World War II), USSR defeats Finland. 1940 Occupation of the Baltic states(Part of World War II), Occupation of the Baltic states by the Red Army 1940 Soviet occupation of Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina(Part of World War II), Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina annexed to the USSR, creation of the Moldovan SSR. 1944–1956 Guerrilla war in the Baltic states, USSR defeats Ukrainian Insurgent Army 1945 Soviet–Japanese War(Part of World War II), USSR defeats Imperial Japan. Karafuto Prefecture is annexed by the Soviet Union and incorporated into Sakhalin Oblast. Kuril Islands annexed to the Soviet Union 1953 East German Uprising, Soviet Union crushed East German demonstrators. 1968 Invasion of Czechoslovakia, Soviet military presence in Czechoslovakia until 1991. 1969 Zhenbao Island Incidentm, USSR defeats China. 1974–1991 Eritrean War of Independence, USSR's proxy defeated. 1975–1991 Angolan Civil War, Independence of Namibia 1977–1978 Ethio-Somali War. Somalia broke all ties with Soviet Union. 1979–1989 Soviet–Afghan War, Failed Soviet attempt to quell Afghan Mujahedeen insurgency Russian Federation (1991-present) 1991–1993 Georgian Civil War, Zviadist revolt crushed. 1991–1993 War in Abkhazia, Russian-backed Abkhazia gained de facto independence from Georgia. 1992 Transnistria War, Russian- Transnistria gained de facto independence from Moldova. 1992 East Prigorodny Conflict, Expulsion of ethnic Ingush from Prigorodny by Ossetian militia 2008 Russo-Georgian War, Expansion of Russain backed Abkhazia and South Ossetia at the expense of Georgia. 2014–present Russo-Ukrainian War, Russian annexation of Crimea 2018–present Central African Republic Civil War, Ongoing.
    1
  2812. 1
  2813. 1
  2814. 1
  2815. 1
  2816. 1
  2817. 1
  2818. 1
  2819. 1
  2820. 1
  2821. 1
  2822. 1
  2823. 1
  2824. 1
  2825. 1
  2826. 1
  2827. 1
  2828. 1
  2829. 1
  2830. 1
  2831. 1
  2832. 1
  2833. 1
  2834. 1
  2835. 1
  2836. 1
  2837. 1
  2838. 1
  2839. 1
  2840. 1
  2841. 1
  2842. 1
  2843. 1
  2844. 1
  2845. 1
  2846. 1
  2847. 1
  2848. 1
  2849. 1
  2850. 1
  2851. 1
  2852. 1
  2853. 1
  2854. 1
  2855. 1
  2856. 1
  2857. 1
  2858. 1
  2859. 1
  2860. 1
  2861. 1
  2862. 1
  2863. 1
  2864. 1
  2865. 1
  2866. 1
  2867. 1
  2868. 1
  2869. 1
  2870. 1
  2871. 1
  2872. 1
  2873. 1
  2874. 1
  2875. 1
  2876. 1
  2877. Monique Ryan is a fool. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  2878. 1
  2879. 1
  2880. 1
  2881. 1
  2882. 1
  2883. 1
  2884. 1
  2885. 1
  2886. 1
  2887. 1
  2888. 1
  2889. 1
  2890. 1
  2891. 1
  2892. 1
  2893. 1
  2894. 1
  2895. 1
  2896. 1
  2897. 1
  2898. 1
  2899. 1
  2900. 1
  2901. 1
  2902. 1
  2903. 1
  2904. 1
  2905. 1
  2906. 1
  2907. 1
  2908. 1
  2909. 1
  2910. 1
  2911. 1
  2912. 1
  2913. 1
  2914. 1
  2915. 1
  2916. 1
  2917. 1
  2918.  @alex_2020  False. Before Euromaidan, 1. Russia, has successfully used political and economic leverage to dissuade Ukraine from signing the E.U. deal. In the months prior to the Vilnius summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a trade war with Kiev, blocking nearly all imports from Ukraine and cutting energy supplies to the country. In turn, this reduced Ukrainian exports by 25 percent and shrank the economy by 1.5 percent. Date: Jan. 7, 2010 Yanukovych: Ukraine will remain a neutral state. "It’s certain that Ukraine was and will be non-aligned state… We strive neither to join NATO nor the [CIS]CSTO [Collective Security Treaty Organization]. We’ll maintain a neutral status," Yanukovych said in an interview with the Komsomolskaya Pravda in Ukraine newspaper. -------- The trigger for Euromaidan was Yanukovych initiated non-neutrality policies such as joining a trade block instead of executing Switzerland-style neutrality. UK leaving the EU and joining CPTPP proves freedom of association. Some trade background for the context From Tradebarrier Index (lower score = less trade barriers) New Zealand's tariff score is 2.92 Australia's tariff score is 3.03 UK's tariff score is 3.94 (after Brexit) Japan's tariff score is 4.05 US's tariff score is 4.54 Germany's tariff score is 4.88 EU's tariff score is 4.88 Russia's tariff score is 6.16 <-------- China's tariff score is 6.8 <------ Russia wants to maintain its higher trade protectionist policies. 2. Victoria Nuland herself doesn't have the power, but about 73% of the MPs—voted to "remove Viktor Yanukovych from the post of president of Ukraine" has the power. Don't assume Ukraine's president has absolute power when 73% of the MPs have voted to "remove Viktor Yanukovych from the post of president of Ukraine". 3. Ukraine Constitution 1991, Article 17, disallows foreign military bases after 2017. According to former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, Ukraine's constitution forbids the country from hosting foreign military bases after 2017. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1991, Article 17. In 2018, President Petro Poroshenko's constitution amendment allowed temporary foreign military bases.
    1
  2919. 1
  2920. 1
  2921. 1
  2922. 1
  2923. 1
  2924. 1
  2925. 1
  2926. 1
  2927. 1
  2928. 1
  2929. 1
  2930. 1
  2931. 1
  2932. 1
  2933. 1
  2934. 1
  2935. 1
  2936. 1
  2937. 1
  2938. 1
  2939. 1
  2940.  @rakeshhubert3031  Note that China has a "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" which is known as CCP's protectionist list. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. ------------------------ China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  2941. 1
  2942. 1
  2943. 1
  2944.  @rakeshhubert3031  READ abc.net.au/news/2020-07-04/victoria-coronavirus-hotel-quarantine-leaves-states-vulnerable/12420970 Quoting from the article A mandatory 14-day quarantine period for travellers returning home from overseas is based on national guidelines, but how those 14 days play out varies across states. A person who tests positive for coronavirus while in hotel quarantine doesn't need to return a negative result before they're allowed to leave, under the national guidelines. In NSW, every returned traveller must be tested at 10 days. In Victoria, people are offered tests on days 3 and 11. Mandatory testing was only introduced last weekend for NSW, and in Victoria the rules have recently been changed so if people decline testing they have to quarantine for a further 10 days. ------------------ NSW is a MUST. VIC is an OFFER. For Victoria's second COVDi-19 wave, Victora is a soft touch. ------------------ From abc.net.au/news/2020-07-04/victoria-coronavirus-hotel-quarantine-leaves-states-vulnerable/12420970 Again, Quoting from the article How is Victoria set up differently? Like other states, Victoria has strict quarantine rules where the person is forbidden from leaving the accommodation unless there is an emergency situation or an exemption based on compassionate grounds. But human error and alleged misconduct has been the main cause of resurgence in COVID-19 cases in Victoria, according to Mr Andrews. Victoria's state-run hotel quarantine has used private security contractors to guard rooms — a process that is now changing after guards contracted the virus and spread it to the community. In NSW, travellers with a fever or who are displaying COVID-19 symptoms are referred to a "Health Hotel", managed by NSW Health. Travellers who are well and have no symptoms are taken to hotels run by NSW Police. Private security guards may assist, but NSW Health says they are all given infection control training. ---------------- Fuckoff.
    1
  2945. 1
  2946. 1
  2947. 1
  2948. 1
  2949. 1
  2950. 1
  2951. 1
  2952. 1
  2953. 1
  2954. 1
  2955. 1
  2956. 1
  2957. 1
  2958. 1
  2959. 1
  2960. 1
  2961. 1
  2962. 1
  2963. 1
  2964. 1
  2965. 1
  2966. 1
  2967. 1
  2968. 1
  2969. 1
  2970. 1
  2971. 1
  2972. 1
  2973. 1
  2974. 1
  2975. 1
  2976. 1
  2977.  @silveriver9  On China issue https://graphitepublications.com/will-chinas-outrageous-rare-earth-monopoly-persist/ China's rare earth near-monopoly was built on SOE (state-own enterprise) which driven private competitors from the market. Rare earth is important for the electronics component production logistics chain. Heavy importers of these REEs such as the U.S., Germany, and Japan believe these rationales disguise China’s true exploitative motive: to force foreign factories to move to China to keep their costs low and their supply high -------------- https://www.forbes.com/sites/douglasbulloch/2016/10/12/protectionism-may-be-rising-around-the-world-but-in-china-it-never-went-away/#5dc3f5df73da Protectionism May Be Rising Around The World, But In China It Never Went Away Promises unkept? Since joining the WTO in 2001, China has repeatedly insisted that it will live up to those undertakings made on entry. In particular, the use of currency manipulation has been identified by the US as a breech of the commitment to end price controls for the purposes of protecting domestic industries. This became a major political issue from 2005 onwards, and has only recently subsided because it is assumed that the RMB is slightly overvalued on the market. Nevertheless, for years it was deliberate policy for the PBoC to accumulate US Dollars and suppress the exchange rate for the RMB, resulting in exactly the price distortions China had committed to eliminate in 2001, and fuelling an enormous trade surplus with the US, which persists and expands to this day. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703321004575427050544485366 After securing Rare-Earth monopoly, China Dangles Rare-Earth Resources to Lure Investment BEIJING—China is cautiously using rare-earth resources as bait for foreign investment that could bring in sophisticated technologies that it needs. Industry and government officials have begun talking about a Chinese government plan to offer access to its rare-earth resources—which are used in products such as hybrid-car batteries and missiles and are under strict export restrictions—to get companies including electronics manufacturers and auto makers to set up rare-earth-processing plants in China. Try again.
    1
  2978. 1
  2979. 1
  2980. 1
  2981. 1
  2982. 1
  2983. 1
  2984. 1
  2985. 1
  2986. 1
  2987. 1
  2988. 1
  2989. 1
  2990. 1
  2991. 1
  2992. 1
  2993. 1
  2994. 1
  2995. 1
  2996. 1
  2997. 1
  2998. 1
  2999. 1
  3000. 1
  3001. 1
  3002. 1
  3003. 1
  3004. 1
  3005. 1
  3006. 1
  3007. 1
  3008. 1
  3009. 1
  3010. 1
  3011. 1
  3012. 1
  3013. 1
  3014. 1
  3015. 1
  3016. 1
  3017. 1
  3018. 1
  3019. 1
  3020. 1
  3021. 1
  3022. 1
  3023. 1
  3024. 1
  3025. 1
  3026. 1
  3027. 1
  3028. 1
  3029. 1
  3030. 1
  3031. 1
  3032. 1
  3033. 1
  3034. 1
  3035. 1
  3036. 1
  3037. 1
  3038. 1
  3039. 1
  3040. 1
  3041. 1
  3042. 1
  3043. 1
  3044. 1
  3045. 1
  3046. 1
  3047. 1
  3048. 1
  3049. 1
  3050. 1
  3051. 1
  3052. 1
  3053. 1
  3054. 1
  3055. 1
  3056. 1
  3057. 1
  3058. 1
  3059. 1
  3060.  @tkw3864  From forbes.com/sites/douglasbulloch/2016/10/12/protectionism-may-be-rising-around-the-world-but-in-china-it-never-went-away/#5dc3f5df73da Protectionism May Be Rising Around The World, But In China It Never Went Away Promises unkept? Since joining the WTO in 2001, China has repeatedly insisted that it will live up to those undertakings made on entry. In particular, the use of currency manipulation has been identified by the US as a breech of the commitment to end price controls for the purposes of protecting domestic industries. This became a major political issue from 2005 onwards, and has only recently subsided because it is assumed that the RMB is slightly overvalued on the market. Nevertheless, for years it was deliberate policy for the PBoC to accumulate US Dollars and suppress the exchange rate for the RMB, resulting in exactly the price distortions China had committed to eliminate in 2001, and fuelling an enormous trade surplus with the US, which persists and expands to this day. Furthermore TRIPS implementation has been given some effect on paper, but has made little progress when it comes to 'enforcement.' This is (according to the WTO) as recently as February 2015, fully 14 years after TRIPS was supposed to be already in effect. The US Trade Representative produces an annual report to Congress on China's WTO compliance which leaves little room to conclude they have so far lived up to their accession commitments. The most recent several-hundred-page document - produced in December 2015 - recites a long list of small measures, committees established, announcements made and new administrative complications faced, all continuing disputes over an agreement theoretically in effect since 2001. Although, therefore, protectionism is rising around the world, it is also true to say that existing practices of protectionism have not fallen in the way that they should have since China's accession to the WTO in 2001. Because of this lack of progress in easing trade, the extended period of currency manipulation, the lack of observance of TRIPS and the sheer administrative resistance exporters face when trying to get their products into China, we now face of world of highly unbalanced trade, and rising mistrust. And it is this that is leading to rising protectionism; the simple fact that it never went away.
    1
  3061. 1
  3062. 1
  3063. 1
  3064. 1
  3065. 1
  3066. 1
  3067. 1
  3068. 1
  3069. 1
  3070. 1
  3071. 1
  3072. 1
  3073. 1
  3074. 1
  3075. 1
  3076. 1
  3077. 1
  3078. 1
  3079. 1
  3080. 1
  3081. 1
  3082. 1
  3083. 1
  3084. 1
  3085. 1
  3086. 1
  3087. 1
  3088. 1
  3089. 1
  3090. 1
  3091. 1
  3092. 1
  3093. 1
  3094. 1
  3095. 1
  3096. 1
  3097. 1
  3098. 1
  3099. 1
  3100. 1
  3101. 1
  3102. 1
  3103. 1
  3104. 1
  3105. 1
  3106. 1
  3107. 1
  3108. 1
  3109. 1
  3110. 1
  3111. 1
  3112. 1
  3113. 1
  3114. 1
  3115. 1
  3116. 1
  3117. 1
  3118. 1
  3119. 1
  3120. 1
  3121. 1
  3122. 1
  3123. 1
  3124. 1
  3125. 1
  3126. 1
  3127. 1
  3128. 1
  3129. 1
  3130. 1
  3131. 1
  3132. 1
  3133. 1
  3134. 1
  3135. 1
  3136. 1
  3137. 1
  3138. 1
  3139. 1
  3140. 1
  3141. 1
  3142. 1
  3143. 1
  3144. 1
  3145. 1
  3146. 1
  3147. 1
  3148.  @TjJay-ev6mx  Depopulation of local Jewish communities Following the 1948 Arab–Israeli War and the 1949 Armistice Agreements, all Jewish communities in Transjordan, the Jordanian-annexed West Bank, and the Egyptian-occupied Gaza Strip were depopulated.[201][202] The communities and localities affected included the Jerusalem Jewish Quarter, Hebron, Ein Tzurim, Masu'ot Yitzhak, Revadim, Beit HaArava, Kalya, Kfar Etzion, Atarot, Kfar Darom, Neve Yaakov, and Tel Or[203][204] In many cases, these depopulations represented final stages of earlier evacuations begun in response to both the 1929 Palestine riots and 1936-1939 Arab Revolt.[205] The Hebron Jewish Community, already having lost a majority of its population as a result of mandatory British evacuation following the 1929 Hebron Massacre, lost its sole remaining Jewish resident Ya’akov Ben Shalom Ezra during the war.[206][207] Kfar Darom, the last of the Gaza Jewish communities following mandatory evacuations in 1929, was itself ultimately abandoned following a three-month siege by the Egyptian army in 1948.[208] In the case of Dead Sea-region kibbutzim of Beit HaArava and Kalya, negotiations with Transjordan's King Abdullah were conducted in an attempt for residents to remain. When those talks failed, the villagers fled by boat to an Israeli military post at Mount Sodom.[209] Judean settlements Kfar Etzion, a kibbutz established southwest of Bethlehem, and Jerusalem adjascent Atarot and Neve Yaakov fared less peacefully during the conflict. All three villages were besieged by a combined force of Arab Legion and local irregulars, resulting in a complete evacuation of Atarot & Neve Yaakov, and a massacre of 127 of Etzion's defending force and citizens.[210] The village of Tel Or had the distinction of being the only Jewish locality permitted in Transjordan proper at the time. Established in 1930 in the vicinity of the Naharayim hydroelectric power plant, the village of was built as a housing compound for Jewish crews operating the power plant, and their families.[211] Following a prolonged battle between Yishuv forces and the Transjordanian Arab Legion in the area, the residents of Tel Or were given an ultimatum to surrender or leave the village. Depopulation of Jerusalem's Jewish Quarter The largest depopulation during the war occurred in Jerusalem's Jewish Quarter, where its entire population of about 2,000 Jews were besieged and ultimately forced to leave en masse. The defenders surrendered on 28 May 1948. Weingarten negotiating the surrender with Arab Legion soldiers The Jordanian commander is reported to have told his superiors: "For the first time in 1,000 years not a single Jew remains in the Jewish Quarter. Not a single building remains intact. This makes the Jews' return here impossible."[212][213] ------------- Afghanistan See also: History of the Jews in Afghanistan The Afghan Jewish community declined from about 40,000 in the early 20th century to 5,000 by 1934 due to persecution. Many Afghan Jews fled to Persia, although some came to Palestine.[239] In 1929, the Soviet press reported a pogrom in Afghanistan.[240] -------------
    1
  3149. >provoke china multiple times Note that China has a "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" which is known as CCP's protectionist list. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited. ------ Try again, hypocrite.
    1
  3150. 1
  3151. 1
  3152. 1
  3153. 1
  3154. 1
  3155. 1
  3156. 1
  3157. 1
  3158.  @atomduke7789  Your assumptions are wrong. Australia's place in any conflict between the US and China is enforcing Australia's freedom of navigation and keeping its shipping lanes open to support its northern allies. Refer to Australia-Japan "Defence Supplies and Services" agreement. Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of Japan concerning Reciprocal Provision of Supplies and Services between the Australian Defence Force and the Self-Defense Forces of Japan - Sydney, 14 January 2017 Obligations 3.14 The provision of any supplies and services under the proposed Agreement must be carried out in accordance with the Parties’ respective national laws and obligations. 3.15 Article I provides that the reciprocal provision of logistic supplies and services under the proposed Agreement will occur for the purposes of: exercises and training with participation by both the ADF and the JSDF; United Nations peacekeeping operations, internationally coordinated peacekeeping and security operations, and humanitarian international relief operations; operations in response to large scale disasters in Australia, Japan or a third country; emergency evacuation of Australian or Japanese nationals, or others from third countries; communication and coordination or other routine activities including visits of ships or aircraft of the ADF or the JSDF;and for other cooperative efforts as mutually determined and permitted under the laws and regulations of the respective Parties (including for unforeseen circumstances or exigencies). 3.16 The inclusion of ‘internationally coordinated peacekeeping and security operations’ as well as enabling the provision of logistic supplies and services for other cooperatively efforts as mutually determined is an expansion of the 2013 Agreement. 3.17 The supplies and services that may be provided under the Agreement are listed in Tabled 3.1 below. 3.18 For the provision of supplies, where possible, the receiving Party must return the supplies in a condition and manner satisfactory to the providing Party. Where supplies cannot be returned in a satisfactory condition or are consumable, the receiving Party must give the providing Party supplies of the same type, quality and quantity. Where neither option is possible, the receiving Party must reimburse the providing Party. 3.19 For the provision of services, the receiving Party may either reimburse the providing Party or provide services of the same type and equivalent value. 3.20 The provision of supplies and services must be carried out in accordance with the Procedural Arrangement as agreed between the Australian Department of Defence and the Japanese Ministry of Defence (Article V). The NIA explains that a new Procedural Arrangement has been concluded however is a less-than-treaty status document. Consequently, the Committee will not have an opportunity to review this supporting document. 3.21 Similarly, disputes between the Australia and Japan must be settled in accordance with the Procedural Arrangement, or otherwise through consultation.24 Reasons for implementing proposed treaty action 3.22 As noted above, the proposal to replace the 2013 Agreement was initiated by Japan, which sought to broaden that Agreement to achieve congruence with defence reforms passed by the National Diet in September 2015. 3.23 The NIA states that the expanded scope of the proposed Agreement: aligns with Australia’s other military logistic support agreements and arrangements and offers Australia the opportunity to further enhance the quality of, and potential for, defence cooperation with Japan, and to broaden the interoperability between the two forces. 3.24 It further asserts that the proposed Agreement is ‘uncontroversial’ and ‘builds on Australia’s existing relationship with Japan in relation to defence matters, and raises no international defence policy issues’. 3.25 If the proposed Agreement were not ratified, Australia’s military logistic relationship with Japan would be out of step with those that Japan has with the United States and the United Kingdom. -------------------------------- 1. It's well known China has attempted to encircle Australia via the second Island chain. China has no business in Australia's Oceania backyard. 2. It's well known China's navy ships has surveyed the East Philippines Sea that is a backup route when South China China / West Philippines Sea is blocked by China.
    1
  3159. 1
  3160. 1
  3161. 1
  3162. 1
  3163. 1
  3164. 1
  3165. 1
  3166. 1
  3167. 1
  3168. 1
  3169. 1
  3170. 1
  3171. 1
  3172.  @ilhanosman4653  Twenty Iraqi Kurds have taken legal action to expose French firms who supplied poison gas to Saddam Hussein in 1988. The plaintiffs were among the victims of a chemical weapon attack that killed 5,000 in the town of Halabja during the Iran-Iraq war. A Dutch businessman who sold Iraq chemicals used in the attack was ordered to pay 400,000 euros to some of the victims in April 2013. ----------- Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq ----------- Fuckoff
    1
  3173. 1
  3174. 1
  3175. 1
  3176. 1
  3177. 1
  3178. 1
  3179. 1
  3180. 1
  3181. 1
  3182. 1
  3183. 1
  3184. 1
  3185. 1
  3186. 1
  3187. 1
  3188. 1
  3189. 1
  3190. 1
  3191. 1
  3192. 1
  3193. 1
  3194. 1
  3195. 1
  3196. 1
  3197. 1
  3198. 1
  3199. 1
  3200. 1
  3201. 1
  3202. 1
  3203. 1
  3204. 1
  3205. 1
  3206. 1
  3207. 1
  3208. 1
  3209. 1
  3210. 1
  3211. 1
  3212. 1
  3213. 1
  3214. 1
  3215. 1
  3216. 1
  3217. 1
  3218. 1
  3219. 1
  3220. 1
  3221. 1
  3222. 1
  3223. 1
  3224. 1
  3225. 1
  3226. 1
  3227. 1
  3228.  @Polleej  https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp0809/09rp36 Quarantine power Section 51(ix) of the Constitution provides that the Commonwealth can pass laws for the peace, order and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to quarantine. The quarantine power has primarily been relied upon in the area of public health.[94] Public health ranges from the regulation of disease prevention to the regulation of tobacco and alcohol.[95] The scope of this power remains uncertain.[96] However, the legislative definition of quarantine includes: the examination, exclusion, detention, observation, segregation, isolation, protection, treatment and regulation of vessels, installations, human beings, animals, plants or other goods or things; or the seizure and destruction of animals, plants, or other goods or things; or the destruction of premises comprising buildings or other structures when treatment of these premises is not practicable; and having as their object the prevention or control of the introduction, establishment or spread of diseases or pests that will or could cause significant damage to human beings, animals, plants, other aspects of the environment or economic activities.[97] While it is conceivable that the quarantine power may support particular aspects of the Commonwealth taking over the administration of public hospitals, such as infection control and therapeutic medicines in Scenario 3, it would be necessary to also rely on other heads of power.[98]
    1
  3229. 1
  3230. 1
  3231. 1
  3232. 1
  3233. 1
  3234. 1
  3235. 1
  3236. 1
  3237. 1
  3238. 1
  3239. 1
  3240. 1
  3241. 1
  3242. 1
  3243. 1
  3244. 1
  3245. 1
  3246. 1
  3247. 1
  3248. 1
  3249. 1
  3250. 1
  3251. 1
  3252. 1
  3253. 1
  3254. 1
  3255. 1
  3256. 1
  3257. 1
  3258. 1
  3259. 1
  3260. 1
  3261. 1
  3262. 1
  3263. 1
  3264. 1
  3265. 1
  3266. 1
  3267. 1
  3268. 1
  3269. 1
  3270. 1
  3271. 1
  3272. 1
  3273. 1
  3274. 1
  3275. 1
  3276. 1
  3277. 1
  3278. 1
  3279. 1
  3280. 1
  3281. 1
  3282. 1
  3283. 1
  3284. 1
  3285. 1
  3286. 1
  3287. 1
  3288. 1
  3289. 1
  3290. 1
  3291. 1
  3292. 1
  3293. 1
  3294. 1
  3295. 1
  3296. 1
  3297. 1
  3298. 1
  3299. 1
  3300. 1
  3301. 1
  3302. 1
  3303. 1
  3304. 1
  3305. 1
  3306. 1
  3307. 1
  3308. 1
  3309. 1
  3310. 1
  3311. 1
  3312. 1
  3313. 1
  3314. 1
  3315. 1
  3316. 1
  3317. 1
  3318. 1
  3319. 1
  3320. 1
  3321. 1
  3322. 1
  3323. 1
  3324. 1
  3325. 1
  3326. 1
  3327. 1
  3328. 1
  3329. 1
  3330. 1
  3331. 1
  3332. 1
  3333. 1
  3334. 1
  3335. 1
  3336. 1
  3337. 1
  3338. 1
  3339. 1
  3340. 1
  3341. 1
  3342. 1
  3343. 1
  3344. 1
  3345.  @WarblesOnALot  https://www.quora.com/Why-does-the-US-Air-Forces-F-35-stealth-fighter-have-heat-issues-when-flying-supersonic-and-whats-overheating With the completion of developmental flight testing, the F-35 no longer has any heat issues when flying within its design flight envelope (with a top speed of Mach 1.6). In the past however there were 2 sets of speed restrictions: In the FY2015 Director of Operational Test & Evaluation (DOT&E) report for the F-35, it was noted that the program had an airspeed restriction in place where F-35s were not permitted to fly at speeds equal or greater than 500kts below 5,000ft, 550kts between 5,000–15,000ft and 600 knots between 15,000–25,000ft, for more than 10 minutes at a time without opening the weapon bay doors to vent the air inside them. Above 25,000ft there were no restrictions (aside from the Mach 1.6 top speed). The reason that this restriction was put in place was because an electronics system that was moved into a weapons bay for easier maintenance access had not been tested and fully certified to last an acceptably long life in high temperatures. When the F-35’s engine is producing high levels of thrust, it produces a significant amount of heat which is transmitted into the weapon bays. This can result in the weapon bays reaching temperatures of over 80C / 176F, so if a circuit board was only previously tested to 85C / 185F, it would require re-verification. Since that report’s release years ago, those flight restrictions have been removed. When the F-35’s afterburner was used for extended periods of time it would cause heat damage to the inner surfaces and coatings of the horizontal stabilisers (which extend out behind the jet, either side of the exhaust plume. This problem was particularly an issue for the F-35B and F-35C variants which accelerate slower and therefore need more time using afterburner to reach speeds such as Mach 1.6. In the first half of 2018 however, all 3 variants of the F-35 were certified to fly their full flight envelope, and the latest DOT&E report has no mention of this issue remaining, or of afterburner usage restrictions being imposed. As for the F-35’s Mach 1.6 speed limit, this is purely a placard limit, where the manufacturer was only contracted to develop a Mach 1.6 capable fighter and no funding or requirement has been made to test whether the jet can exceed Mach 1.6 by a non-trivial amount. Diagrams of the F-35’s flight envelope suggest that all 3 variants can fly faster than Mach 1.6, with the F-35A’s diagram appearing to suggest a top speed of around Mach 1.8 or higher, but this is speculation, and Lockheed cannot guarantee the jet will continue to be safe to operate to (eg) Mach 1.8 without studies and flight testing. In any case, top speeds are not very relevant to real world combat (due to how quickly jets will drain their already partially-depleted fuel tanks trying to reach them) and there could be thermal issues (either with even hotter weapon bays, or additional horizontal tail heating, or with aerodynamic heating causing issues for the jet’s stealth coatings).
    1
  3346. 1
  3347. 1
  3348. 1
  3349. 1
  3350. 1
  3351. 1
  3352. 1
  3353. 1
  3354. 1
  3355. 1
  3356.  @raptordriver7340  From RAAF's F-22A vs F-15D with Digital Radio Frequency Memory (DRFM) experience “…the ability to actually have that data fusion that the aeroplane has makes an incredible difference to how you perform in combat. I saw it first hand on a Red Flag mission in an F15D against a series of fifth-generation F22s. We were actually in the red air. In five engagements we never knew who had hit us and we never even saw the other aeroplane…. After that particular mission I went back and had a look at the tapes on the F22, and the difference in the situational awareness in our two cockpits was just so fundamentally different. That is the key to fifth-generation. That is where I have trouble with the APA analysis…. To me that is key: it is not only stealth; it is the combination of the EOS and the radar to be able to build a comprehensive picture. In that engagement I talked about at Nellis, in Red Flag, the ability to be in a cockpit with a God’s-eye view of what is going on in the world was such an advantage over a fourth-generation fighter – and arguably one of the best fourth-generation fighters in existence, the F15. But even with a DRFM jamming pipe, we still had no chance in those particular engagements. And at no time did any of the performance characteristics that you are talking about have any relevance to those five engagements.” ------------ Both F-35 and F-22 have a passive stereo radar that can locate, track and target EM emission source i.e. F-15 is painting target me with its jammer. F-15EX does NOT replace F-22A or NGAD.
    1
  3357. 1
  3358. 1
  3359. 1
  3360. 1
  3361. 1
  3362. 1
  3363. 1
  3364. 1
  3365. 1
  3366. 1
  3367. 1
  3368. 1
  3369. 1
  3370. 1
  3371. 1
  3372. 1
  3373. 1
  3374. 1
  3375. 1
  3376. 1
  3377. 1
  3378. 1
  3379. 1
  3380. 1
  3381. 1
  3382. 1
  3383. 1
  3384. 1
  3385. 1
  3386. 1
  3387. 1
  3388. 1
  3389. 1
  3390. 1
  3391. 1
  3392. 1
  3393. 1
  3394. 1
  3395. 1
  3396. 1
  3397. 1
  3398. 1
  3399. 1
  3400. 1
  3401. 1
  3402. 1
  3403. 1
  3404. 1
  3405. 1
  3406. 1
  3407. 1
  3408. 1
  3409. 1
  3410. 1
  3411. 1
  3412. 1
  3413. 1
  3414. 1
  3415. 1
  3416. 1
  3417. 1
  3418. 1
  3419. 1
  3420. 1
  3421. 1
  3422. 1
  3423. 1
  3424. 1
  3425. 1
  3426. 1
  3427. 1
  3428. 1
  3429. 1
  3430. 1
  3431. 1
  3432. 1
  3433. 1
  3434. 1
  3435. 1
  3436. 1
  3437. 1
  3438. 1
  3439. 1
  3440. 1
  3441. 1
  3442. 1
  3443. 1
  3444. 1
  3445. 1
  3446. 1
  3447. 1
  3448. 1
  3449. 1
  3450. 1
  3451. 1
  3452. 1
  3453. 1
  3454. 1
  3455. 1
  3456. 1
  3457. 1
  3458. 1
  3459. 1
  3460. 1
  3461.  @kickDustPedestrian  From euractiv However, Germany’s Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, who is also from the Greens, sees things in a different light. “As things stand at present, this pipeline cannot be approved because it does not meet the requirements of European energy law,” Baerbock told ZDF on 12 December, saying “the safety issues are still unresolved anyway”. Furthermore, it is clear “that in the event of further escalations, this pipeline could not be connected to the grid,” she said, noting that the agreement struck with the US during the last year of Angela Merkel’s reign had foreseen a similar understanding. The US had sought to ensure the territorial integrity of Ukraine without upholding the sanctions on the pipeline that had raised hackles in Berlin. Her position has now been enhanced by her fellow Green Super-Minister Robert Habeck. “Any new military action cannot remain without severe consequences,” Habeck stated in the interview as reported by DW. The option of blocking the pipeline would be on the table, if “there is a new violation of the territorial integrity” of Ukraine, he said. As Scholz has been officially appointed Chancellor on 8 December, the row may officially mark the end of the shortest ever honeymoon period for a German government, and reveals the difficult position his coalition currently finds itself in. Germany is heavily reliant on gas: more than 25% of energy used in the country comes from natural gas, a majority of which is imported from Russia. Nord Stream 2 is a beloved project of the SPD. The last SPD chancellor before Scholz, Gerhard Schröder, had overseen the construction of Nord Stream 1 while powerful party leaders continue to be committed to it. Scholz was secretary-general of the SPD under Schröder, underlining his longstanding involvement in the project. “We need this gas pipeline,” said Manuela Schwesig, the dominant SPD minister-president of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern in an interview with Spiegel, warning against “mixing the constriction of the pipeline with foreign policy issues”. The new Chancellor appears stuck between the demands of his party but is being publicly challenged by his vice chancellor and some of the government’s most powerful ministers, revealing internal tensions within the young government coalition. The €11 billion pipeline, which has been called “the biggest mistake” of Angela Merkel by EPP President Donald Tusk, may continue to rock domestic and foreign politics long after her departure. ---- German Greens will kill Nord Stream 2. Without the greens, Scholz's government is dead.
    1
  3462. 1
  3463. 1
  3464. 1
  3465. 1
  3466. 1
  3467. 1
  3468. 1
  3469. 1
  3470. 1
  3471. 1
  3472. 1
  3473. 1
  3474. 1
  3475. 1
  3476. 1
  3477. 1
  3478. 1
  3479. 1
  3480. 1
  3481. 1
  3482. 1
  3483. 1
  3484. 1
  3485. 1
  3486. 1
  3487. 1
  3488. 1
  3489. 1
  3490. "We cannot buy our security, our freedom from the threat of the bomb by committing an immorality so great as saying to a billion human beings now enslaved behind the Iron Curtain, "Give up your dreams of freedom because to save our own skins, we're willing to make a deal with your slave masters." Alexander Hamilton said, "A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one." Now let's set the record straight. There's no argument over the choice between peace and war, but there's only one guaranteed way you can have peace -- and you can have it in the next second -- surrender. Admittedly, there's a risk in any course we follow other than this, but every lesson of history tells us that the greater risk lies in appeasement, and this is the specter our well-meaning liberal friends refuse to face -- that their policy of accommodation is appeasement, and it gives no choice between peace and war, only between fight or surrender. If we continue to accommodate, continue to back and retreat, eventually we have to face the final demand -- the ultimatum. And what then -- when Nikita Khrushchev has told his people he knows what our answer will be? He has told them that we're retreating under the pressure of the Cold War, and someday when the time comes to deliver the final ultimatum, our surrender will be voluntary, because by that time we will have been weakened from within spiritually, morally, and economically. He believes this because from our side he's heard voices pleading for "peace at any price" or "better Red than dead," or as one commentator put it, he'd rather "live on his knees than die on his feet." And therein lies the road to war, because those voices don't speak for the rest of us. You and I know and do not believe that life is so dear and peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery. If nothing in life is worth dying for, when did this begin -- just in the face of this enemy? Or should Moses have told the children of Israel to live in slavery under the pharaohs? Should Christ have refused the cross? Should the patriots at Concord Bridge have thrown down their guns and refused to fire the shot heard 'round the world? The martyrs of history were not fools, and our honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis didn't die in vain. Where, then, is the road to peace? Well it's a simple answer after all. You and I have the courage to say to our enemies, "There is a price we will not pay." "There is a point beyond which they must not advance." And this -- this is the meaning in the phrase of Barry Goldwater's "peace through strength." Winston Churchill said, "The destiny of man is not measured by material computations. When great forces are on the move in the world, we learn we're spirits -- not animals." And he said, "There's something going on in time and space, and beyond time and space, which, whether we like it or not, spells duty." You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We'll preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on earth, or we'll sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness."
    1
  3491. 1
  3492. 1
  3493. 1
  3494. 1
  3495. 1
  3496. 1
  3497. 1
  3498. 1
  3499. 1
  3500.  @torrokasparov2210  1. Ex-Colonel Macgregor (who left US Army in June 2004) did not consider ramifications in relation to Budapest Memorandum. 2. Ex-Colonel Macgregor's argument runs contrary to the Trump administration's withdrawal from Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces. 3. EUCOM has 75,000 personnel already in Europe, British has 153,290 active personnel (1_January_2021_SPS PDF) and Poland has 160,000 active personnel (2022). Poland has 1,700,000 reserve personnel (2022). Using the UK as a large unsinkable aircraft carrier, USAF F-35A's 1407 km combat radius (internal tanks) can reach into Ukraine. From Norway, F-35A's has a striking range into Moscow. From Italy, F-35A's has a striking range near Moscow. Finland is buying F-35A with a 1407 km combat radius which has a longer range when compared to Finland's existing F/A-18C's 740 km combat radius (can reach just outside of Moscow). Poland is buying F-35A with a 1407 km. F-35A has a longer range with an engine upgrade road map and external fuel tanks. F-35A was purpose-designed to invade a certain hostile country from the pre-1997 position, unlike a short-leg defensive fighter F-16. F-35A has reduced the need for air tankers and USN's aircraft carriers. F-35A's digital FCS and powerful onboard computers can be modified as an unmanned supersonic stealth cruise missile platform for two B61 Mod 12 nuclear bombs. Every European country with F-35A has gained long-range strike capability and turned short-range defensive B61 nuclear bombs into deep strike B61 Mod 12 nuclear bombs. Germany's interest has returned to F-35A for its NATO shared B61 Mod 12 nuclear bomb strike platform. Putin's complaining about Ageis AShore MK41 VLS in Poland and Romania are distractions. Ex-Colonel Macgregor has a US Army mindset, not from the US Strategic Command mindset. US Strategic Command has USN Admiral Charles A. Richard, USAF Lt General Thomas A. Bussiere, and USMC SgtMaj Howard L. Kreamer. US Strategic Command is stacked with USAF, USN, and USMC commanding officers. 4. Ex-Colonel Macgregor's combined arms reform argument is not new since the Department of the Navy already has combined arms with the United States Marine Corps.
    1
  3501. 1
  3502. 1
  3503. 1
  3504. 1
  3505. 1
  3506. 1
  3507. 1
  3508. 1
  3509. 1
  3510. 1
  3511. 1
  3512. 1
  3513. 1
  3514. 1
  3515. 1
  3516. 1
  3517. 1
  3518. 1
  3519. 1
  3520. 1
  3521. 1
  3522. 1
  3523. 1
  3524. 1
  3525. 1
  3526. 1
  3527. 1
  3528. 1
  3529. 1
  3530. 1
  3531. 1
  3532. 1
  3533. 1
  3534. 1
  3535. 1
  3536. 1
  3537. 1
  3538. 1
  3539. 1
  3540. 1
  3541. 1
  3542. 1
  3543. 1
  3544. 1
  3545. 1
  3546. 1
  3547. 1
  3548. 1
  3549. 1
  3550. 1
  3551. 1
  3552. 1
  3553. 1
  3554. 1
  3555. 1
  3556. 1
  3557. 1
  3558. 1
  3559. 1
  3560. 1
  3561. 1
  3562. 1
  3563. 1
  3564. 1
  3565. 1
  3566. 1
  3567. 1
  3568. 1
  3569. 1
  3570. 1
  3571. 1
  3572. 1
  3573. 1
  3574. 1
  3575. 1
  3576. 1
  3577. 1
  3578. 1
  3579. 1
  3580. 1
  3581. 1
  3582. 1
  3583. 1
  3584. 1
  3585. 1
  3586. 1
  3587. 1
  3588. 1
  3589. 1
  3590. 1
  3591. 1
  3592. 1
  3593. 1
  3594. 1
  3595. 1
  3596. 1
  3597. 1
  3598. 1
  3599. 1
  3600. 1
  3601. 1
  3602. 1
  3603. 1
  3604. 1
  3605. 1
  3606. 1
  3607. 1
  3608. 1
  3609. 1
  3610. 1
  3611. 1
  3612. 1
  3613. 1
  3614. 1
  3615. 1
  3616. 1
  3617. 1
  3618. 1
  3619. 1
  3620. 1
  3621. 1
  3622. 1
  3623. 1
  3624. 1
  3625. 1
  3626. 1
  3627. 1
  3628. 1
  3629. 1
  3630. 1
  3631. 1
  3632. 1
  3633. 1
  3634. 1
  3635. 1
  3636. 1
  3637. 1
  3638. 1
  3639. 1
  3640. 1
  3641. 1
  3642. 1
  3643. 1
  3644. 1
  3645. 1
  3646. 1
  3647. 1
  3648. 1
  3649. 1
  3650. 1
  3651. 1
  3652. 1
  3653. 1
  3654. 1
  3655. 1
  3656. 1
  3657. 1
  3658. 1
  3659. 1
  3660. 1
  3661. 1
  3662. 1
  3663.  @johnrittel6129  Another problem. News(from ABC NET AU) : Ancient virus lurking in remote Australia, affecting thousands of Aboriginal adults In a brightly lit lab in the outback town of Alice Springs, researchers have been inspecting vials of blood infected with an ancient virus that has lurked in Australia for thousands of years. It is called T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1— or HTLV-1 — and Australia has the highest levels in the world. A distant relative of HIV, it is a blood-borne virus that can be sexually transmitted or passed from mother to child. The virus can lead to inflammation of the skin, eyes and lungs. "You're also at risk of developing things like leukemia, so blood cancer, and becoming disabled through spinal cord injuries," researcher Joel Liddle said. "Once your pro-viral load is high, you're at a high risk of poor health." Researchers said, in most cases, leukaemia caused by the virus could be "rapidly fatal". Researchers from the Baker Institute for Heart and Diabetes in Alice Springs estimated 45 percent of Indigenous adults in central Australia had HTLV-1 . "In remote Australia, it's so out of sight, out of mind with a lot of things, health is just one of those things," Mr Liddle said. One of the difficulties with this virus is that most of those who have HTLV-1, don't know they have it, and a vast number of Aboriginal communities have never been tested. "I think there's probably confusion and a little bit of anger, too. People [question] why haven't they been told about this," Mr Liddle said. "There's a lot of reasons to breastfeed. Prolonged breastfeeding may be something that could be addressed but that's up to Aboriginal people to decide." For Mr Liddle, an Arrernte man, a response to high rates of HTLV-1 demands a delicate approach, with intensive education work delivered in Aboriginal languages. "I think there's a lot of work to do, certainly I think at the moment, what I see as our main thing is to engage sensitively around the issues because we're dealing with people's health, and all the things and complexities that are going on in remote communities, so we have to be really mindful of that." ------ This ancient virus is related to HIV( i.e. HTLV-1) and reduces an adult's life span. To fix this issue, non-Aboriginal R&D will be needed to cure this ancient issue, promote safe sex culture (i.e. change culture), and practise monogamy (i.e. change culture).
    1
  3664. 1
  3665. 1
  3666. 1
  3667. 1
  3668. 1
  3669. 1
  3670. 1
  3671. 1
  3672. 1
  3673. 1
  3674. 1
  3675. 1
  3676. 1
  3677. 1
  3678. 1
  3679. 1
  3680. 1
  3681. 1
  3682. 1
  3683. 1
  3684. 1
  3685. 1
  3686. 1
  3687. 1
  3688. 1
  3689. 1
  3690. 1
  3691. 1
  3692. 1
  3693. 1
  3694. 1
  3695. 1
  3696. 1
  3697. 1
  3698. 1
  3699. 1
  3700. 1
  3701. 1
  3702. 1
  3703. 1
  3704. 1
  3705. 1
  3706. 1
  3707. 1
  3708. 1
  3709. 1
  3710. 1
  3711. 1
  3712. 1
  3713. 1
  3714. 1
  3715. 1
  3716. 1
  3717. 1
  3718. 1
  3719. 1
  3720. 1
  3721. 1
  3722. 1
  3723. 1
  3724. 1
  3725. 1
  3726. 1
  3727. 1
  3728. 1
  3729. 1
  3730. 1
  3731. 1
  3732. 1
  3733. 1
  3734. 1
  3735. 1
  3736. 1
  3737. 1
  3738. 1
  3739. 1
  3740. 1
  3741. 1
  3742. 1
  3743. 1
  3744. 1
  3745. 1
  3746. 1
  3747. 1
  3748. 1
  3749. 1
  3750. 1
  3751. 1
  3752. 1
  3753. 1
  3754. 1
  3755. 1
  3756. 1
  3757. 1
  3758. 1
  3759. 1
  3760. 1
  3761. 1
  3762. 1
  3763. 1
  3764. 1
  3765. 1
  3766. 1
  3767. 1
  3768. 1
  3769. 1
  3770. 1
  3771. 1
  3772. 1
  3773. 1
  3774. Before Euromaidan, Russia started a trade war against Ukraine, forcing Yanukovych to sign a base rental extension agreement that breached Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 disallows foreign military bases after 2017. Read the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 which disallows foreign military bases after 2017. CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on 28 June 1996 Article 17 The location of foreign military bases shall not be permitted on the territory of Ukraine. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17. After 2017, Ukraine's constitution is incompatible with foreign military bases hosting either NATO or CSTO. If Yanukovych didn't sign the military base rental extension, Russia would be kicked out of Crimea. Putin's narrative is FALSE. Putin's pressure caused Yanukovych to make a mistake. ----- Every country has the right to operate a biolab and Ukraine did NOT invade another country. Basic pathology blood test requires a bio lab. Saddam's Iraq invaded two other countries i.e. Kuwait and Iran. Remember, Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum exchanged Ukraine's nuclear WMD for security assurances from US, UK, and Russia. France and China signed a watered-down Budapest Memorandum. Budapest Memorandum requires Ukraine to join Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty as part of Ukraine's nuclear WMD disarmament. Tucker is ignorant of Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum. Did you know Australia has similar security assurances like Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum and Australia does NOT have a NATO Article V level guarantee with the US? From 1950 to the 1960s, Australia detonated nuclear bombs as a joint partner with the UK. Australia has many Biolabs for agriculture, animal health, human health and 'etc'. -----
    1
  3775. 1
  3776. 1
  3777. 1
  3778. 1
  3779. 1
  3780. 1
  3781. 1
  3782. 1
  3783. 1
  3784. 1
  3785. 1
  3786. 1
  3787. 1
  3788. 1
  3789. 1
  3790. 1
  3791. 1
  3792. 1
  3793. 1
  3794. 1
  3795. 1
  3796. 1
  3797. 1
  3798. 1
  3799. 1
  3800. 1
  3801. 1
  3802. 1
  3803. 1
  3804. 1
  3805. 1
  3806. 1
  3807. 1
  3808. 1
  3809. 1
  3810. 1
  3811. 1
  3812. 1
  3813. 1
  3814. 1
  3815. 1
  3816. 1
  3817. 1
  3818. 1
  3819. 1
  3820. 1
  3821. 1
  3822. 1
  3823. 1
  3824. 1
  3825. 1
  3826. 1
  3827. 1
  3828. 1
  3829. 1
  3830. 1
  3831. 1
  3832. 1
  3833. 1
  3834. 1
  3835. 1
  3836. 1
  3837. 1
  3838. 1
  3839. 1
  3840. 1
  3841. 1
  3842. 1
  3843. 1
  3844. 1
  3845. 1
  3846. 1
  3847. 1
  3848. 1
  3849. 1
  3850. 1
  3851. 1
  3852. 1. It's well known China has attempted to encircle Australia via the second Island chain. China has no business in Australia's Oceania backyard. 2. It's well known China's navy ships has surveyed the East Philippines Sea that is a backup route when South China China / West Philippines Sea is blocked by China. Australia's place in any conflict between the US and China is enforcing Australia's freedom of navigation and keeping its shipping lanes open to support its northern allies. Refer to Australia-Japan "Defence Supplies and Services" agreement. Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of Japan concerning Reciprocal Provision of Supplies and Services between the Australian Defence Force and the Self-Defense Forces of Japan - Sydney, 14 January 2017 Obligations 3.14 The provision of any supplies and services under the proposed Agreement must be carried out in accordance with the Parties’ respective national laws and obligations. 3.15 Article I provides that the reciprocal provision of logistic supplies and services under the proposed Agreement will occur for the purposes of: exercises and training with participation by both the ADF and the JSDF; United Nations peacekeeping operations, internationally coordinated peacekeeping and security operations, and humanitarian international relief operations; operations in response to large scale disasters in Australia, Japan or a third country; emergency evacuation of Australian or Japanese nationals, or others from third countries; communication and coordination or other routine activities including visits of ships or aircraft of the ADF or the JSDF;and for other cooperative efforts as mutually determined and permitted under the laws and regulations of the respective Parties (including for unforeseen circumstances or exigencies). 3.16 The inclusion of ‘internationally coordinated peacekeeping and security operations’ as well as enabling the provision of logistic supplies and services for other cooperatively efforts as mutually determined is an expansion of the 2013 Agreement. 3.17 The supplies and services that may be provided under the Agreement are listed in Tabled 3.1 below. 3.18 For the provision of supplies, where possible, the receiving Party must return the supplies in a condition and manner satisfactory to the providing Party. Where supplies cannot be returned in a satisfactory condition or are consumable, the receiving Party must give the providing Party supplies of the same type, quality and quantity. Where neither option is possible, the receiving Party must reimburse the providing Party. 3.19 For the provision of services, the receiving Party may either reimburse the providing Party or provide services of the same type and equivalent value. 3.20 The provision of supplies and services must be carried out in accordance with the Procedural Arrangement as agreed between the Australian Department of Defence and the Japanese Ministry of Defence (Article V). The NIA explains that a new Procedural Arrangement has been concluded however is a less-than-treaty status document. Consequently, the Committee will not have an opportunity to review this supporting document. 3.21 Similarly, disputes between the Australia and Japan must be settled in accordance with the Procedural Arrangement, or otherwise through consultation. Reasons for implementing proposed treaty action 3.22 As noted above, the proposal to replace the 2013 Agreement was initiated by Japan, which sought to broaden that Agreement to achieve congruence with defence reforms passed by the National Diet in September 2015. 3.23 The NIA states that the expanded scope of the proposed Agreement: aligns with Australia’s other military logistic support agreements and arrangements and offers Australia the opportunity to further enhance the quality of, and potential for, defence cooperation with Japan, and to broaden the interoperability between the two forces. 3.24 It further asserts that the proposed Agreement is ‘uncontroversial’ and ‘builds on Australia’s existing relationship with Japan in relation to defence matters, and raises no international defence policy issues’. 3.25 If the proposed Agreement were not ratified, Australia’s military logistic relationship with Japan would be out of step with those that Japan has with the United States and the United Kingdom.
    1
  3853. 1
  3854. 1
  3855. 1
  3856. 1
  3857. 1
  3858. 1
  3859. 1
  3860. 1
  3861. 1
  3862. 1
  3863. 1
  3864. 1
  3865. 1
  3866. 1
  3867. 1
  3868. 1
  3869. 1
  3870. 1
  3871. 1
  3872. 1
  3873. 1
  3874. 1
  3875. 1
  3876. 1
  3877. 1
  3878. 1
  3879. 1
  3880. 1
  3881. 1
  3882. 1
  3883. 1
  3884. 1
  3885. 1
  3886. 1
  3887. 1
  3888. 1
  3889. 1
  3890. 1
  3891. 1
  3892. 1
  3893. 1
  3894. 1
  3895. 1
  3896. 1
  3897. 1
  3898. 1
  3899. 1
  3900. 1
  3901. 1
  3902. 1
  3903. 1
  3904. 1
  3905. 1
  3906. @RustyBoysGaming >nothing will ever stop the CIA Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country".[8] You're a hypocrite. Sorry, the US has entered the same geopolitics as Russian Empire's and Russian-dominated USSR's geopolitics game.
    1
  3907. 1
  3908. 1
  3909. 1
  3910. 1
  3911. 1
  3912. 1
  3913. 1
  3914.  @garawa1987  News(from ABC NET AU) : Ancient virus lurking in remote Australia, affecting thousands of Aboriginal adults In a brightly lit lab in the outback town of Alice Springs, researchers have been inspecting vials of blood infected with an ancient virus that has lurked in Australia for thousands of years. It is called T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1— or HTLV-1 — and Australia has the highest levels in the world. A distant relative of HIV, it is a blood-borne virus that can be sexually transmitted or passed from mother to child. The virus can lead to inflammation of the skin, eyes and lungs. "You're also at risk of developing things like leukemia, so blood cancer, and becoming disabled through spinal cord injuries," researcher Joel Liddle said. "Once your pro-viral load is high, you're at a high risk of poor health." Researchers said, in most cases, leukaemia caused by the virus could be "rapidly fatal". Researchers from the Baker Institute for Heart and Diabetes in Alice Springs estimated 45 percent of Indigenous adults in central Australia had HTLV-1 . "In remote Australia, it's so out of sight, out of mind with a lot of things, health is just one of those things," Mr Liddle said. One of the difficulties with this virus is that most of those who have HTLV-1, don't know they have it, and a vast number of Aboriginal communities have never been tested. "I think there's probably confusion and a little bit of anger, too. People [question] why haven't they been told about this," Mr Liddle said. "There's a lot of reasons to breastfeed. Prolonged breastfeeding may be something that could be addressed but that's up to Aboriginal people to decide." For Mr Liddle, an Arrernte man, a response to high rates of HTLV-1 demands a delicate approach, with intensive education work delivered in Aboriginal languages. "I think there's a lot of work to do, certainly I think at the moment, what I see as our main thing is to engage sensitively around the issues because we're dealing with people's health, and all the things and complexities that are going on in remote communities, so we have to be really mindful of that." ------ This ancient virus is related to HIV( i.e. HTLV-1) and reduces an adult's life span. To fix this issue, non-Aboriginal R&D will be needed to cure this ancient issue, promote safe sex culture (i.e. change culture), and practise monogamy (i.e. change culture). The Aborigines are killing themselves by their own actions.
    1
  3915. 1
  3916. 1
  3917. 1
  3918. 1
  3919. 1
  3920. 1
  3921. 1
  3922. 1
  3923. 1
  3924. 1
  3925. 1
  3926. 1
  3927. 1
  3928. 1
  3929. 1
  3930. 1
  3931. 1
  3932. 1
  3933. 1
  3934. 1
  3935. 1
  3936. ​ @phyllismawhinney8707  The breakup of Yugoslavia is a three way contest which mirrored geopolitics from Western/Central Europe (Protestant/Catholics), Russian Empire (Russian Federation, Christian Orthodox) and Ottoman Empire (Turkey, Islam). Backgound http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1992-01-16/news/9201050384_1_croatia-cease-fire-european-nations "*The European move, and follow-up actions elsewhere, are expected to put pressure on the United States to grant recognition*, even though it has been opposed to such a step at this time. The U.S. fears that recognition could endanger the current cease-fire in the war between Serbia and Croatia and cause the war to spread to Bosnia-Herzegovina." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_Yugoslav_breakup 19 December 1991: Germany announces that it will recognize Croatia on January 15, 1992, with or without the rest of the European Community. 23 December 1991: Germany becomes the first major power to recognize Croatia and Slovenia as independent states 15 January 1992: The European Community recognizes Slovenia and Croatia. Without NATO (backed by U.S.), Germany/Austria would have done it alone and we would have another WW1 trigger i.e. Russia would have taken on Germany and Austria as in WWI. Attacks on Poland would have brought in UK which brings US. NATO and USA kept Russia in check. Support for Bosnia Musilims supports NATO member Turkey's interest. Turkey needs to be booted from NATO. The "old world" geopolitics did not disappear.
    1
  3937. 1
  3938. 1
  3939. 1
  3940. 1
  3941. 1
  3942. 1
  3943. 1
  3944. 1
  3945. 1
  3946. 1
  3947. 1
  3948. 1
  3949. 1
  3950. 1
  3951. 1
  3952. 1
  3953. For around Nigeria area. Before British colonization, at the beginning of the 19th century, Usman dan Fodio led a successful jihad against the Hausa Kingdoms founding the centralised Sokoto Caliphate. The empire with Arabic as its official language grew rapidly under his rule and that of his descendants, who sent out invading armies in every direction. The vast landlocked empire connected the east with the western Sudan region and made inroads down south conquering parts of the Oyo Empire (modern-day Kwara), and advanced towards the Yoruba heartland of Ibadan, to reach the Atlantic Ocean. The territory controlled by the empire included much of modern-day northern and central Nigeria. The sultan sent out emirs to establish a suzerainty over the conquered territories and promote Islamic civilization, the emirs in turn became increasingly rich and powerful through trade and slavery. By the 1890s, the largest slave population in the world, about two million, was concentrated in the territories of the Sokoto Caliphate. The use of slave labour was extensive, especially in agriculture. ---- Woke professor Yaba Blay is racist herself when She stereotyped a certain racial group. Yaba Blay should direct her BLM BS against the governing party for the Confederate States of America (CSA) i.e. Democratic Party. Yaba Blay is a racist hypocrite. The George FLoyd debacle is on county government that governs the local Police service i.e. Democratic Party. Amy Klobuchar (Democrat) didn't prosecute the officer at the center of George Floyd's death. George Floyd's death was under the Democrat government in Minneapolis and the police department. Democrats-run city's police department failed to protect private properties that are unrelated to Floyd's death. Leftist BLM didn't focus on governing Democrats. Leftists still vote for Democrats. For the Australian context, Andrew Fisher's Labor government started the Stolen Generation in 1909.
    1
  3954. 1
  3955. 1
  3956. 1
  3957. 1
  3958.  @hueym2196  Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte has been told to drop his government’s controversial nitrogen emissions policy by Caroline van der Plas, the leader of the Farmer-Citizen Movement (BBB) who stormed to victory in regional elections last week, as the pair met for the first time since the electoral success. At van der Plas’ invitation, the meeting took place at De Landbouw restaurant in Wassenaar, an affluent suburb of The Hague on Tuesday. The BBB leader urged Rutte to admit defeat on his nitrogen emissions reduction policy which has resulted in nationwide protests among rural communities and propelled van der Plas’ party into amassing the highest number of seats in the Dutch Senate. “The support in the cabinet has more or less been canceled, and I wanted to know from him how seriously he takes this,” van der Plas told De Telegraaf about the meet. “I have expressed some serious concerns. Also about the crisis of confidence in the Netherlands, sticking to 2030, and the expropriation of farmers. I told Rutte: just take it out, that will give you peace of mind,” she added. The BBB leader revealed she would soon be taking her opposition to the Dutch government’s plans to Brussels, telling reporters she will schedule a call with EU Commissioner Frans Timmermans imminently. “In Europe, the basic rules are laid down. Timmermans has already indicated that there is some movement on how Europe can help the Netherlands get rid of the nitrogen lock. I am now going back to the office to make an appointment with him,” she added. Rutte offered little to the press following the meeting, claiming the pair had a “good” and “nice conversation.” The heavy defeat of his four-party coalition government has thrown the emissions plans into jeopardy, and the minor Christian Democratic Appeal has already called for change. Party leader Wopke Hoekstra suggested on Friday his party would propose adjustments to cabinet policy, and on Tuesday morning, party colleague Pieter Heerma also called for a government reversal.
    1
  3959. 1
  3960. 1
  3961. 1
  3962. 1
  3963. 1
  3964. 1
  3965. 1
  3966. 1
  3967. 1
  3968. 1
  3969. 1
  3970. 1
  3971. 1
  3972. 1
  3973. 1
  3974. 1
  3975. 1
  3976. 1
  3977. 1
  3978. 1
  3979. 1
  3980. 1
  3981. 1
  3982. 1
  3983. 1
  3984. 1
  3985. 1
  3986. 1
  3987. 1
  3988. 1
  3989. 1
  3990. 1
  3991. 1
  3992. 1
  3993. 1
  3994. 1
  3995. 1
  3996. 1
  3997. 1
  3998. 1
  3999. 1
  4000. 1
  4001. 1
  4002. 1
  4003. 1
  4004. 1
  4005. 1
  4006. 1
  4007. 1
  4008. 1
  4009. 1
  4010. 1
  4011. 1
  4012. 1
  4013. 1
  4014. 1
  4015. 1
  4016.  @duckmanone5435  The Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng) were a series of military campaigns launched by the Qing dynasty of China in the mid–late 18th century during the reign of the Qianlong Emperor (r. 1735–1796). They included three to enlarge the area of Qing control in Inner Asia: two against the Dzungars (1755–1757) and the "pacification" of Xinjiang (1758–1759). The other seven campaigns were more in the nature of police actions on frontiers already established: two wars to suppress the Gyalrong of Jinchuan, Sichuan, another to suppress the Taiwanese Aboriginals (1787–88), and four expeditions abroad against the Burmese (1765–1769), the Vietnamese (1788–1789), and the Gurkhas on the border between Tibet and Nepal (1790–1792), with the last counting as two. President Xi's argument is based on historical Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns. Territorial disputes around Xi's China are based on Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns. During the 4th Sino-Burmese Wars starting in 1768, Imperial China invaded the Kingdom of Burma. Burma hired European musketeers and gunners, hence Burma allied itself with the rising French Empire against Imperial China's invasion. Imperial China's imperialist conquest led to kinetic engagement with other powers. Look in the mirror. ----- Picking on the Britsh is flawed when the UK lost the British Empire. The British Empire does NOT exist. Both China and Russia are the two surviving "old world" imperial empires that largely preserved their imperial land territories. China and Russia think that communism clean slate of their imperialist colonial past.
    1
  4017.  @duckmanone5435  Before Euromaidan, Russia started a trade war against Ukraine, forcing Yanukovych to sign a base rental extension agreement that breached Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 disallows foreign military bases after 2017. Read the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 which disallows foreign military bases after 2017. CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on 28 June 1996 Article 17 The location of foreign military bases shall not be permitted on the territory of Ukraine. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17. After 2017, Ukraine's constitution is incompatible with foreign military bases hosting either NATO or CSTO. If Yanukovych didn't sign the military base rental extension, Russia would be kicked out of Crimea. Putin's narrative is FALSE. Putin's pressure caused Yanukovych to make a mistake. Look in the mirror. Your argument about the Minsk Peace Agreements of 2014 is meaningless when Russia executed old-school imperialist land grabbing five Oblast from Ukraine. The peaceful method is to execute targeted refugee policies just as Australia/UK/Canada/NZ did when your fellow BRICS member South African government prosecuted the White farmers. The US, UK, and Russia signed Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum that traded Ukraine's nuclear weapons for security assurances. Russia has exited Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum. France and China have signed a watered-down Budapest Memorandum. US, UK, and France are "respecting" Ukraine's territorial integrity and support "security assurance" for Ukraine and you can't say the same for Russia.
    1
  4018. 1
  4019. 1
  4020. 1
  4021. 1
  4022. 1
  4023. 1
  4024. 1
  4025. 1
  4026. 1
  4027. 1
  4028.  @fitchjoe1865  Against CCP's claim "No proof that COVID-19 originated in Wuhan: Peter Forster" https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/covid-19-genetic-network-analysis-provides-snapshot-of-pandemic-origins Study charts the 'incipient supernova' of COVID-19 through genetic mutations as it spread from China and Asia to Australia, Europe and North America Versions of ‘A’ were seen in Chinese individuals, and Americans reported to have lived in Wuhan, and mutated versions of ‘A’ were found in patients from the USA and Australia. Wuhan’s major virus type, ‘B’, was prevalent in patients from across East Asia. However, the variant didn’t travel much beyond the region without further mutations – implying a 'founder event' in Wuhan, or 'resistance' against this type of COVID-19 outside East Asia, say researchers. * CCP's claim "No proof that COVID-19 originated in Wuhanr" is bullshit* . From https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2020/04/07/2004999117 has https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/early/2020/04/07/2004999117/F1.large.jpg Fig. 1. Phylogenetic network of 160 SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Node A is the root cluster obtained with the bat (R. affinis) coronavirus isolate BatCoVRaTG13 from Yunnan Province. Circle areas are proportional to the number of taxa, and each notch on the links represents a mutated nucleotide position. The sequence range under consideration is 56 to 29,797, with nucleotide position (np) numbering according to the Wuhan 1 reference sequence (8). The median-joining network algorithm (2) and the Steiner algorithm (9) were used, both implemented in the software package Network5011CS (https://www.fluxus-engineering.com/), with the parameter epsilon set to zero, generating this network containing 288 most-parsimonious trees of length 229 mutations. The reticulations are mainly caused by recurrent mutations at np11083. The 161 taxa (160 human viruses and one bat virus) yield 101 distinct genomic sequences. The phylogenetic diagram is available for detailed scrutiny in A0 poster format (SI Appendix, Fig. S5) and in the free Network download files.
    1
  4029. 1
  4030. 1
  4031. 1
  4032. 1
  4033. 1
  4034. 1
  4035. 1
  4036. 1
  4037. 1
  4038.  @justanotherhobbit7215  1. "Sky Corp" doesn't exist. Prove amendments were made by Sky Corp. Where's the submission. 2. These private companies have demand to be left alone from government interference while the same private companies interfered in the government election process. 3. On news item placement, transparency should include the high-level algorithm for legal entities involved in the process e.g. News Networks . Your conspiracy theory is BS. 4. ABC https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/left-wing-bias-proves-it-is-clearly-their-abc-20210111-p56taq Left-wing bias proves it is clearly 'their ABC' The last major bush-fire issue shows ABC's leftist agenda when 50C temp is not enough to start a bush fire. As for https://www.sbs.com.au/news/eight-in-ten-australians-fear-climate-change-will-cause-more-bushfires-and-want-a-transition-away-from-coal SBS shows their leftist green agenda when the last federal election smashed their argument. 5. Peter Costello is not the CEO of Nine Entertainment Co. The merger between Nine Entertainment Co. and Fairfax Media results in Nine shareholders own 51.1 percent of the combined entity and Fairfax shareholders own 48.9 percent. Australian Channel Nine's Today shows their hate against Brooke Smith's lifestyle. If Brooke Smith's lifestyle was LGBT, there will be an uproar against Channel Nine's Today's hate. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-7971151/Stay-home-mums-housework-list-sparks-debate-Facebook-people-say-shes-living-50s-life.html Try again
    1
  4039. 1
  4040. 1
  4041. 1
  4042. 1
  4043. 1
  4044. 1
  4045. 1
  4046. 1
  4047. 1
  4048. 1
  4049. 1
  4050. 1
  4051. 1
  4052. 1
  4053. 1
  4054. 1
  4055. 1
  4056. 1
  4057.  @StealthyyyHD  Your facts are FALSE. Minsk I By January 2015, the Minsk Protocol ceasefire had completely collapsed. Following the separatist victory at Donetsk International Airport in defiance of the Protocol. Minsk II The full text of the agreement is as follows: 1. Immediate and full ceasefire in particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine and its strict fulfilment as of 00:00 midnight EET on 15 February 2015. 2. Pull-out of all heavy weapons by both sides to equal distance with the aim of creation of a security zone on minimum 50 kilometres (31 mi) apart for artillery of 100mm calibre or more, and a security zone of 70 kilometres (43 mi) for multiple rocket launchers (MRLS) and 140 kilometres (87 mi) for MLRS Tornado-S, Uragan, Smerch, and Tochka U tactical missile systems: for Ukrainian troops, from actual line of contact; for armed formations of particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine, from the contact line in accordance with the Minsk Memorandum as of 19 September 2014 The pullout of the above-mentioned heavy weapons must start no later than the second day after the start of the ceasefire and finish within 14 days. This process will be assisted by OSCE with the support of the Trilateral Contact Group. 3. Effective monitoring and verification of ceasefire regime and pullout of heavy weapons by OSCE will be provided from the first day of pullout, using all necessary technical means such as satellites, drones, radio-location systems etc. 4. On the first day after the pullout a dialogue is to start on modalities of conducting local elections in accordance with the Ukrainian legislation and the Law of Ukraine "On temporary Order of Local Self-Governance in Particular Districts of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts," and also about the future of these districts based on the above-mentioned law. Without delays, but no later than 30 days from the date of signing of this document, a resolution has to be approved by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, indicating the territory which falls under the special regime in accordance with the law "On temporary Order of Local Self-Governance in Particular Districts of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts," based in the line set up by the Minsk Memorandum as of 19 September 2014. 5. Provide pardon and amnesty by way of enacting a law that forbids persecution and punishment of persons in relation to events that took place in particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine. 6. Provide release and exchange of all hostages and illegally held persons, based on the principle of "all for all". This process has to end – at the latest – on the fifth day after the pullout (of weapons). 7. Provide safe access, delivery, storage and distribution of humanitarian aid to the needy, based on an international mechanism. 8. Define the modalities of a full restoration of social and economic connections, including social transfers, such as payments of pensions and other payments (income and revenue, timely payment of communal bills, restoration of tax payments within the framework of Ukrainian legal field). With this aim, Ukraine will restore management over the segment of its banking system in the districts affected by the conflict, and possibly, an international mechanism will be established to ease such transactions. 9. Restore control of the state border to the Ukrainian government in the whole conflict zone, which has to start on the first day after the local election and end after the full political regulation (local elections in particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts based on the law of Ukraine and Constitutional reform) by the end of 2015, on the condition of fulfilment of Point 11 – in consultations and in agreement with representatives of particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts within the framework of the Trilateral Contact Group. 10. Pullout of all foreign armed formations, military equipment, and also mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine under OSCE supervision. Disarmament of all illegal groups. 11. Constitutional reform in Ukraine, with a new constitution to come into effect by the end of 2015, the key element of which is decentralisation (taking into account peculiarities of particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, agreed with representatives of these districts), and also approval of permanent legislation on the special status of particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts in accordance with the measures spelt out in the attached footnote,[note 1] by the end of 2015. 12. Based on the Law of Ukraine "On temporary Order of Local Self-Governance in Particular Districts of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts", questions related to local elections will be discussed and agreed upon with representatives of particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts in the framework of the Trilateral Contact Group. Elections will be held in accordance with relevant OSCE standards and monitored by OSCE/ODIHR. 13. Intensify the work of the Trilateral Contact Group including through the establishment of working groups on the implementation of relevant aspects of the Minsk agreements. They will reflect the composition of the Trilateral Contact Group. Signatories The document was signed by: Separatist's leaders Alexander Zakharchenko and Igor Plotnitsky Swiss diplomat and OSCE representative Heidi Tagliavini Former president of Ukraine and Ukrainian representative Leonid Kuchma Russian Ambassador to Ukraine and Russian representative Mikhail Zurabov ------
    1
  4058. 1
  4059. 1
  4060. 1
  4061. 1
  4062. 1
  4063. 1
  4064. 1
  4065. 1
  4066. 1
  4067. 1
  4068. 1
  4069. 1
  4070. 1
  4071. 1
  4072. 1
  4073. 1
  4074. 1
  4075. 1
  4076. 1
  4077. 1
  4078. 1
  4079. 1
  4080. 1
  4081. 1
  4082. 1
  4083. 1
  4084. 1
  4085. 1
  4086. 1
  4087. 1
  4088. 1
  4089. 1
  4090. 1
  4091. 1
  4092. 1
  4093. 1
  4094. 1
  4095. 1
  4096. 1
  4097. 1
  4098. 1
  4099. 1
  4100. 1
  4101. 1
  4102. 1
  4103. 1
  4104. 1
  4105. 1
  4106. 1
  4107. 1
  4108. 1
  4109. 1
  4110. 1
  4111. 1
  4112. 1
  4113. 1
  4114. 1
  4115. 1
  4116. 1
  4117. 1
  4118. 1
  4119. 1
  4120. 1
  4121. 1
  4122. 1
  4123. 1
  4124. 1
  4125. 1
  4126. 1
  4127. 1
  4128. 1
  4129. 1
  4130. 1
  4131. 1
  4132. 1
  4133. 1
  4134. 1
  4135. 1
  4136. 1
  4137. 1
  4138. 1
  4139. 1
  4140. 1
  4141. 1
  4142. @Jay P >This example will show you how little you people know about the dirty tactics of Australians in Png That's a red herring. >Ok Tedi mine the Australian Manager opened a bank account in Singapore in 2013 the balance was 5 Billion and 200 Aussie owned credit cards were living off that account until one of the landowners complained they were not getting their royalties. Ok Tedi Mining Limited. The PNG Sustainable Development Program (SDP) was set up after BHP’s exit from the Ok Tedi mine in PNG’s Western Province just over a decade ago i.e. Year 2002. Essentially, BHP wanted to shut down the mine, the PNG government, however, wanted the mine to continue because it needed the tax revenue. (BHP exits from Ok Tedi Mining Limited from about 2002). But BHP did not want to give its shares in Ok Tedi to the PNG government because of well-established concerns about corruption and limited capacity within the PNG public sector. The compromise reached was an agreement that PNG would give its shares to a new trust fund, SDP, which would be registered in Singapore as a public company to be run by a board of directors, some nominated by BHP, the others nominated by a variety of PNG institutions . SDP was established in 2002. After a third shareholder exited, SDP was left with 63% of Ok Tedi’s shares. The remaining 37% were held by the government. With last decade’s resource boom, Ok Tedi became much more profitable than had ever been envisaged. It is now PNG’s largest mine and revenue earner. In 2011, it paid K1.2 billion (about $508 million) in tax. The original idea that the mine would close shortly after 2010 has been replaced by a plan to extend mine-life by shifting from open-cut to below-ground mining, which would require new legislation. SDP’s funds also grew rapidly over the decade. The value of its long-term fund reached $US 1.4 billion in 2012. Its annual development expenditure expanded, making it the second-largest donor in PNG, after AusAID. There was recurring tension between SDP and the PNG government over the last decade, but Sir Michael Somare had helped negotiate the deal while he was mining minister, so while he was prime minister (from 2002 to 2011) SDP was safe. Towards the end of 2012, Ross Garnaut, chairman of SDP since its inception, handed over the reins to Sir Mekere Morauta, who, as PM at the establishment of SDP, had also helped negotiate the deal. Comments made by Garnaut at the time about revenue from Ok Tedi (“it’s very tempting for political figures to think of better ways of using it right now rather than putting it into long-term development”) led to the PM banning his entry to the country. (An aside on another SDP board member: there was a remarkable announcement in the media recently that Jacob Weiss, a former International Monetary Fund employee who helped establish SDP and who served on its board as the Central Bank’s representative for the last 10 years, was stood down earlier in the year by the SDP Board on conflict-of-interest grounds, including his “appointment as the leader of the government team set up to take over PNG SDP’s shares in Ok Tedi”. It doesn’t get much stranger than that.) It became clear under O’Neill that legislation would only be passed to extend the life of Ok Tedi if SDP exited. Under its new chairman, SDP took a pragmatic and conciliatory approach. At its annual meeting a few months ago, Mekere appeared to acquiesce to its removal from Ok Tedi provided that there was a negotiated agreement, including a “fair and transparent” process. It seems from press reports that there were some discussions, but evidently agreement could not be reached. And so, after an escalating war of words, O’Neill not only introduced legislation this week, but had it passed by Parliament, all in the same day, to nationalise both Ok Tedi and SDP. According to reports, some members absented themselves from the vote, including Sir Michael Somare, who spoke against it, but no one voted against it. ------------ 1. In 2002, BHP Billiton completed its withdrawal from the project by transferring its majority shareholding to the PNG Sustainable Development Program. 2. Ok Tedi mine was nationalized in 2013. 3. Dr. Jakob Weiss (the IMF guy), a central banking specialist from the Bank of Israel to head the Economics department at the Bank of PNG. Unlike you, names were identified and attached. 4. Notice the amount of Australian aid (AusAID) being given to PNG exceeds SDP’s.
    1
  4143. 1
  4144. 1
  4145. 1
  4146. 1
  4147. 1
  4148. 1
  4149. 1
  4150. 1
  4151. @Blackjack Videos https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion Jacob Brafman, a Russian Jew from Minsk, had a falling out with agents of the local qahal and consequently turned against Judaism. He subsequently converted to the Russian Orthodox Church and authored polemics against the Talmud and the qahal You failed with the basics, hence why I used Wiki. Loser Imperial Purssia (Germany) exported Marx Communism ideology to Russia. Loser Imperial Russia era exported Protocols of the Elders of Zion like ideology to Germany. Both Nazi Germany and USSR invaded Poland, hence started WW2. Any idealogies from loser countries from Germany to Russia are ideological land mines which sets the stage for WW2. -------------- https://www.britannica.com/topic/Talmud Opposition To The Talmud Despite the central place of the Talmud in traditional Jewish life and thought, significant Jewish groups and individuals have opposed it vigorously. The Karaite sect in Babylonia, beginning in the 8th century, refuted the oral tradition and denounced the Talmud as a rabbinic fabrication. Medieval Jewish mystics declared the Talmud a mere shell covering the concealed meaning of the written Torah, and heretical messianic sects in the 17th and 18th centuries totally rejected it. The decisive blow to Talmudic authority came in the 18th and 19th centuries when the Haskala (the Jewish Enlightenment movement) and its aftermath, Reform Judaism, secularized Jewish life and, in doing so, shattered the Talmudic wall that had surrounded the Jews. Thereafter, modernized Jews usually rejected the Talmud as a medieval anachronism, denouncing it as legalistic, casuistic, devitalized, and unspiritual. Reformist Jews dumps Talmud!
    1
  4152. 1
  4153. 1
  4154. 1
  4155. 1
  4156. 1
  4157. 1
  4158. 1
  4159. 1
  4160. 1
  4161. 1
  4162. 1
  4163. 1
  4164. 1
  4165. 1
  4166.  @nobordersnowelfare7285  >Yeah, maybe they got tired of the killings of Russians in Donbas and Luhansk? Putin's argument on Ukrainians and Russians being one people was debunked when either side enforced their respective languages, the opposite side complains. Ukraine still allows English language schools. HAHAHAHAH LOL Is English taught in Russian schools? Today, foreign language learning has become compulsory in Russia. Students can choose from different language such as German, French and Spanish. Among the other foreign languages taught in Russia, English is the most widely chosen language by Russian students (Kruglyi stol 2007 cited in Proshina 2010). Hint: EuroVision's English language dominance. > The thought of Tomahawks 600 km away from Moscow maybe? The US has rejected Tomahawks' sales to Israel. Besides the micro-nuclear reactor IP access, Australia needs the AUKUS agreement for Tomahawk cruise missiles. Moscow has placed nuclear missiles next to the EU countries, hypocrite. Your argument is Russia 1st. >Ukraines aspirations of NATO-membership? Unlike Russia's action against Ukraine, Greece has withdrawn from NATO Command when Turkey invaded Cyprus, hence showing freedom of association. Unlike Russia's action against Ukraine, the UK has exited from EU while on track to join CPTPP, hence showing freedom of association. Before Euromaidan, Russia, however, has successfully used political and economic leverage to dissuade Ukraine from signing the E.U. deal. In the months prior to the Vilnius summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a trade war with Kiev, blocking nearly all imports from Ukraine and cutting energy supplies to the country. In turn, this reduced Ukrainian exports by 25 percent and shrank the economy by 1.5 percent. Russia started a series of events that lead to Euromaidan.
    1
  4167.  @nobordersnowelfare7285  >How about NATOs destruction of Libya, Iraq and Syria? That's a false equivalence. Unlike Russia, the US did NOT assimilate Iraq into US federal structure. >Libya NATO STOPPED the bloody civil war in Libya. Putin STARTED the bloody war in Ukraine. On 16 August 2003, Libya formally admitted responsibility for Pan Am Flight 103 (Lockabie bombing) in a letter presented to the president of the United Nations Security Council. "On 10 March 2011, France was the first country in the world to recognise the National Transitional Council as the legitimate government of Libya". >Iraq Iraq invaded Kuwait. Iraq STARTED the bloody war in Kuwait. Iraq's top oil exports countries from Jan to Jun 2020 1st, China! 29 million tonnes <---- LOL 2nd, India, 23 million tonnes 3rd, EU, 8 million tonnes 4th, South Korea, 6 million tonnes 5th, Turkey, 4 million tonnes with an upwards trend 5th, USA, 4 million tonnes with a downwards trend Report: Saudi Arabia Presses U.S. on Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Date: January 19, 1992 From AP NEWS NEW YORK (AP) _ Saudi Arabia is pressuring the Bush administration to secretly arm and give intelligence to Iraqi opposition forces so they can work to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a newspaper reported Sunday. The Saudis want the United States to give arms and intelligence to Kurdish rebels in north Iraq, Shiite Muslim fighters in the south and Sunni Muslim opposition forces in central Iraq, the Times said, quoting U.S. and allied officials it didn’t name.
    1
  4168. 1
  4169. 1
  4170. 1
  4171. 1
  4172. 1
  4173. 1
  4174. 1
  4175. 1
  4176.  @nobordersnowelfare7285  >or how about 13% flat tax like in Russia? The Russian tax system tends to use moderate flat or regressive tax rates. It is highly centralized for a federal state and relies heavily on proceeds from oil and natural gas corporations, who themselves are mostly state owned. In 2006 the tax burden on oil companies exceeded 45 percent of net sales (compared to 12 percent in construction and 16.5 percent in telecommunications). Rates for oil-related taxes and tariffs, unlike regular taxes, are set not by the Tax Code but by government decree. The Russian Ministry of Finance estimated that revenues regulated by the Tax Code accounted for 68 percent of federal revenue in 2008 fiscal year, rising to 73 percent in 2010. Individuals are supposed to pay in income tax (13 percent), land tax (0.3 percent of the land's cadastral plot which is calculated by a special formula) and vehicle tax (which is linked to the vehicle's engine power). Most small businesses are eligible for simplified taxation and can choose one of the following taxes: income tax (6 percent) or profits tax (15 percent) or unified agricultural tax (6 percent, farmers only) or tax on imputed income (calculated by a special formula, certain companies only). Corporate taxes for medium and large businesses include profits tax (20 percent), value-added tax (20 percent), property tax (0-2 percent) and some other taxes like water tax and mineral tax. ------ Russia's VAT (GST in Oz) is 20%. Australia's GST is 10%.
    1
  4177. 1
  4178. 1
  4179. 1
  4180. 1
  4181. 1
  4182. 1
  4183. 1
  4184. 1
  4185. 1
  4186. 1
  4187. 1
  4188. 1
  4189. 1
  4190. 1
  4191. 1
  4192. 1
  4193. 1
  4194. 1
  4195. 1
  4196. 1
  4197. 1
  4198. 1
  4199. 1
  4200. 1
  4201. 1
  4202. 1
  4203. 1
  4204. 1
  4205. 1
  4206. 1
  4207. 1
  4208. 1
  4209. 1
  4210. 1
  4211. 1
  4212. 1
  4213. 1
  4214. 1
  4215. 1
  4216. 1
  4217. 1
  4218. 1
  4219. 1
  4220. 1
  4221. 1
  4222. 1
  4223. 1
  4224. 1
  4225. 1
  4226. 1
  4227. 1
  4228. 1
  4229. 1
  4230. 1
  4231. 1
  4232. 1
  4233. 1
  4234. 1
  4235. 1
  4236. 1
  4237. 1
  4238. 1
  4239. 1
  4240. 1
  4241. 1
  4242. 1
  4243. 1
  4244. 1
  4245. 1
  4246. 1
  4247. 1
  4248. 1
  4249. 1
  4250. 1
  4251. 1
  4252. 1
  4253. 1
  4254. 1
  4255. 1
  4256. 1
  4257. 1
  4258. 1
  4259. 1
  4260. 1
  4261. 1
  4262. 1
  4263. 1
  4264. 1
  4265. 1
  4266. 1
  4267. 1
  4268. 1
  4269. 1
  4270. 1
  4271. 1
  4272. 1
  4273. 1
  4274. 1
  4275. 1
  4276. 1
  4277.  @gboete  Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq
    1
  4278. 1
  4279. 1
  4280. 1
  4281. 1
  4282. 1
  4283. 1
  4284. 1
  4285. 1
  4286. 1
  4287. 1
  4288. 1
  4289. 1
  4290. 1
  4291. 1
  4292. 1
  4293. 1
  4294. 1
  4295. 1
  4296. 1
  4297. 1
  4298. 1
  4299. 1
  4300. 1
  4301. 1
  4302. 1
  4303. 1
  4304. 1
  4305. 1
  4306. 1
  4307. 1
  4308. 1
  4309. 1
  4310. 1
  4311. 1
  4312. 1
  4313. 1
  4314. 1
  4315. 1
  4316. 1
  4317. 1
  4318. 1
  4319. 1
  4320. 1
  4321. 1
  4322. 1
  4323. 1
  4324. 1
  4325. 1
  4326. 1
  4327.  @chcheese8108  When the House Judiciary Committee held a hearing on social media censorship late last month, liberal Democratic congressman Ted Lieu transformed into a hardcore libertarian. “This is a stupid and ridiculous hearing,” he said, because “the First Amendment applies to the government, not private companies.” He added that just as the government cannot tell Fox News what content to air, “we can’t tell Facebook what content to filter,” because that would be unconstitutional. Lieu is incorrect. While the First Amendment generally does not apply to private companies, the Supreme Court has held it “does not disable the government from taking steps to ensure that private interests not restrict . . . the free flow of information and ideas.” But as Senator Ted Cruz points out, Congress actually has the power to deter political censorship by social media companies without using government coercion or taking action that would violate the First Amendment, in letter or spirit. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act immunizes online platforms for their users’ defamatory, fraudulent, or otherwise unlawful content. Congress granted this extraordinary benefit to facilitate “forum[s] for a true diversity of political discourse.” This exemption from standard libel law is extremely valuable to the companies that enjoy its protection, such as Google, Facebook, and Twitter, but they only got it because it was assumed that they would operate as impartial, open channels of communication—not curators of acceptable opinion.
    1
  4328. 1
  4329. 1
  4330. 1
  4331. 1
  4332. 1
  4333. 1
  4334. 1
  4335. 1
  4336. 1
  4337. 1
  4338. 1
  4339. 1
  4340. 1
  4341. 1
  4342. 1
  4343. 1
  4344. 1
  4345. 1
  4346. 1
  4347. 1
  4348. 1
  4349. 1
  4350. 1
  4351. 1
  4352. 1
  4353. 1
  4354. 1
  4355. 1
  4356. 1
  4357. 1
  4358. 1
  4359. 1
  4360. 1
  4361. 1
  4362. 1
  4363. 1
  4364. 1
  4365. 1
  4366. 1
  4367. 1
  4368. 1
  4369. Australia doesn't have a defense treaty with Taiwan. Australia has a defense treaty with the US. US and Japan have a defense treaty. If Australia offers logistics support for the US, China will attack Australia. If Australian ships escort Australian loaded cargo ships to Japan in support of US/JP operations, China will attack Australia. If Australia enforces its own (trade) freedom of navigation with Japan during a conflict between US/JP vs CHina, China will attack Australia. The US is caught in a pickle i.e. It was the US that restricted Taiwan's nukes in exchange for military supply guarantees. It was the US that restricted Japan's nukes in exchange for security guarantees. Trump's solution is to allow these countries to be armed with their own nuke weapons and reduce the US's defense obligation. The Taiwan Relations Act does not guarantee the U.S. will intervene militarily if the PRC attacks or invades Taiwan nor does it relinquish it, as its primary purpose is to ensure the US's Taiwan policy will not be changed unilaterally by the president and ensure any decision to defend Taiwan will be made with the consent of Congress. The act states that "the United States will make available to Taiwan such defense articles and defense services in such quantity as may be necessary to enable Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capabilities". Reduced US defense obligation in the East Asian region yields Australia's reduced involvement in the East Asian region. If the US abandons Taiwan after the US restricted Taiwan's nuclear weapons, it signals the US allies to be armed with independent nuclear weapons and proves UK/France/Israel's independent nuclear weapons arguments. Again, Trump's solution is to allow the mentioned smaller countries to be armed with their own nuke weapons and reduce the US's defense obligation.
    1
  4370. 1
  4371. 1
  4372. 1
  4373. 1
  4374. 1
  4375. 1
  4376. 1
  4377. 1
  4378. 1
  4379. 1
  4380. 1
  4381. 1
  4382. 1
  4383. 1
  4384. 1
  4385. 1
  4386. 1
  4387. 1
  4388. 1
  4389. 1
  4390. 1
  4391. 1
  4392. 1
  4393. 1
  4394. 1
  4395. 1
  4396. 1
  4397. 1
  4398. 1
  4399. 1
  4400. 1
  4401. 1
  4402. 1
  4403. 1
  4404. 1
  4405. 1
  4406. 1
  4407. 1
  4408. 1
  4409. 1
  4410. 1
  4411. 1
  4412. 1
  4413. 1
  4414. 1
  4415.  @gnbilios  Your " first preferences to jobs went to Asians" is technically incorrect, for specifics, read https://www.dfat.gov.au/trade/agreements/in-force/chafta/fact-sheets/Pages/chafta-fact-sheet-movement-of-natural-persons Specifically, China provides guaranteed access to Australian citizens and permanent residents for the following categories: # Intra-corporate transferees for up to three years (including executives, managers and specialists); # Contractual service suppliers, in certain sectors, for one year, or longer if stipulated under the relevant contract; # Installers and maintainers for up to 180 days; and Business visitors for up to 180 days. Furthermore, for the first time in any FTA, China guarantees equivalent entry and stay for dependants and spouses of Australians granted entry as intra-corporate transferees or contractual service suppliers for longer than 12 months. (while) Australia provides guaranteed access to Chinese citizens for the following categories: # Intra-corporate transferees and independent executives for up to four years (including executives, managers and specialists); # Contractual service suppliers for up to four years; including guaranteed access for up to a combined total of 1,800 per year in four occupations: Chinese chefs, WuShu martial arts coaches, Traditional Chinese Medicine practitioners and Mandarin language tutors (subject to meeting standard immigration requirements); Installers and servicers for up to 3 months; and # Business visitors for up to 90 days, or 6 months for business visitors who are service sellers. ----------------
    1
  4416. 1
  4417. 1
  4418. 1
  4419. 1
  4420. 1
  4421. 1
  4422. 1
  4423. 1
  4424. 1
  4425. 1
  4426. 1
  4427. 1
  4428. 1
  4429. 1
  4430. 1
  4431. 1
  4432. @male princess CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  4433. 1
  4434. 1
  4435. 1
  4436. 1
  4437. 1
  4438. 1
  4439. 1
  4440. 1
  4441. 1
  4442. 1
  4443. 1
  4444. 1
  4445. 1
  4446. 1
  4447. 1
  4448. 1
  4449. 1
  4450. 1
  4451. 1
  4452. 1
  4453. 1
  4454. 1
  4455. 1
  4456. 1
  4457. 1
  4458. 1
  4459. 1
  4460. 1
  4461. 1
  4462. 1
  4463. 1
  4464. 1
  4465. 1
  4466. 1
  4467. 1
  4468. 1
  4469. 1
  4470. 1
  4471. 1
  4472. 1
  4473. 1
  4474. 1
  4475. 1
  4476. 1
  4477. 1
  4478. 1
  4479. 1
  4480. 1
  4481. 1
  4482. 1
  4483. 1
  4484. 1
  4485. 1
  4486. 1
  4487. 1
  4488. 1
  4489. 1
  4490. 1
  4491. 1
  4492. 1
  4493.  @MickDavies  It's you who is missing the point when battery technology improves over time e.g. Tesla's incoming 4680 battery tech. Tesla rolled out hundreds if not thousands of small improvements today that bring step change improvements to the fundamental building block of Tesla’s business — the battery cell. 14% improvement in cost/kWh coming from the change in cell form factor. 18% improvement in cost/kWh as a result of the 10× manufacturing footprint reduction and 10× manufacturing energy consumption reduction. The new dry manufacturing process enables pressing the active battery powder material directly into a film. The new manufacturing process is based on Maxwell Technologies’ proprietary “proof of concept” process. Process is not at production scale yet, but there is a “clear path” to large scale production. 5% improvement in cost/kWh coming from the increase utilization of silicon in the battery cells. 12% reduction in cost/kWh coming from improvements in the cathode material. 7% improvement in battery pack cost per kWh as a result of Tesla’s new integrated vehicle design. Tesla redesigned its vehicles using new front and rear castings that integrate with the battery pack. To accomplish this, Tesla developed a completely new alloy to enable casting of some of the largest components in the automotive space. These bolt directly into a new “structural battery,” eliminating the need for redundant, parallel elements in Teslas. All told, Tesla’s redesign of the battery, cathode, and vehicle frame translate to an expected improvement of 56% in Tesla’s cost per kWh.
    1
  4494. 1
  4495. 1
  4496. 1
  4497.  @margaretcaine4219  You're incorrect. 1. KMT is overreaching its territorial claim since on the eve of the 1894 Sino-Japanese War, about 45 percent of the island was administered under the Manchus Qing administration (Imperial China) while the remaining land area was populated by Taiwanese aborigines. The U.S. position on Taiwan’s international status is “undetermined,” in accordance with the outcome of the 1951-52 San Francisco Peace Treaty. In that treaty, Japan had formally ceded sovereignty over the island, but it was not decided to whom. Most countries at the 1951 Peace Conference argued that Taiwan’s status needed to be determined in due time, in accordance with the principle of self-determination enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations. Post-WW2, Taiwan and the Pescadores islands are not handed to China, and KMT is a foreign government in exile under the American occupation of Japanese Taiwan islands. In Taiwan, the KMT government was politically defeated by partly aboriginal Taiwanese Tsai Ing-wen Democratic Progressive Party. On the eve of the 1894 Sino-Japanese War, about 45 percent of the island was administered under the Manchus Qing administration (Imperial China) while the remaining was populated by Taiwanese aborigines. Imperialist Manchus Qing's Imperial China didn't fully control Taiwan. 2. KMT was militarily defeated by CCP. KMT rejected CCP and it has runaway to "“undetermined" Formosa. 3. KMT was politically defeated by partly aboriginal Taiwanese Tsai Ing-wen Democratic Progressive Party.
    1
  4498. 1
  4499. 1
  4500. 1
  4501. 1
  4502. 1
  4503.  @stephenkolostyak4087  Legality In accordance with the provisions of Article 2 of San Francisco Peace Treaty, the Japanese formally renounced the territorial sovereignty of Taiwan and Penghu islands, and the treaty was signed in 1951 and came into force in 1952. At the date when the San Francisco Peace Treaty came into force, the political status of Taiwan and Penghu Islands was still uncertain.[358] The Republic of China and Japan signed the Treaty of Taipei on April 28, 1952, and the treaty came into force on August 5, which is considered by some as giving a legal support to the Republic of China's claim to Taiwan as "de jure" territory. The treaty stipulates that all treaties, conventions, and agreements between China and Japan prior to 9 December 1941 were null and void, which according to Hungdah Chiu, abolishes the Treaty of Shimonoseki ceding Taiwan to Japan. The interpretation of Taiwan becoming the Republic of China's '"de jure" territory is supported by several Japanese court decisions such as the 1956 Japan v. Lai Chin Jung case, which stated that Taiwan and the Penghu islands came to belong to the ROC on the date the Treaty of Taipei came into force.[361] Nevertheless, the official position of the Government of Japan is that Japan did not in the Treaty of Taipei express that Taiwan and Penghu belong to the Republic of China,[364] that the Treaty of Taipei could not make any disposition which is in violation of Japan's renouncing Taiwan and Penghu in San Francisco Peace Treaty,[365] and that the status of Taiwan and Penghu remain to be determined by the Allied Powers in the future. Writing in the American Journal of International Law, professors Jonathan I. Charney and J. R. V. Prescott argued that "none of the post–World War II peace treaties explicitly ceded sovereignty over the covered territories to any specific state or government." The Cairo Conference from November 22–26, 1943 in Cairo, Egypt was held to address the Allied position against Japan during World War II, and to make decisions about postwar Asia. One of the three main clauses of the Cairo Declaration was that "all the territories Japan has stolen from the Chinese, such as Manchuria, Formosa, and The Pescadores, shall be restored to the Republic of China". According to Taiwan Civil Society quoting the Taiwan Documents Project, the document was merely a statement of intent or non-binding declaration, for possible reference used for those who would draft the post-war peace treaty and that as a press release it was without force of law to transfer sovereignty from Taiwan to the Republic of China. Additional rationale to support this claim is that the Act of Surrender, and SCAP General Order no. 1, authorized the surrender of Japanese forces, not Japanese territories. In 1952, Winston Churchill said that Taiwan was not under Chinese sovereignty and the Chinese Nationalists did not represent the Chinese state, but that Taiwan was entrusted to the Chinese Nationalists as a military occupation. Churchill called the Cairo Declaration outdated in 1955. The legality of the Cairo Declaration was not recognized by the deputy prime minister of the United Kingdom, Anthony Eden, in 1955, who said there was a difference of opinion on which Chinese authority to hand it over to. In 1954, the United States denied that the sovereignty of Taiwan and the Penghu islands had been settled by any treaties, although it acknowledged that the Republic of China effectively controlled Taiwan and Penghu. In the 1960 Sheng v. Rogers case, it was stated that, in the view of the U.S. State Department, no agreement has purported to transfer the sovereignty of Taiwan to the ROC, though it accepted the exercise of Chinese authority over Taiwan and recognized the Government of the Republic of China as the legal government of China at the time. According to Vincent Wei-Cheng Wang, a minority of scholars and politicians have argued that the international status of Taiwan is still undecided, and that this has been used as an argument against the People's Republic of China's claim over Taiwan. They point to President Truman's statement on the pending status of Taiwan in 1950, the lack of specificity on whom the title of Taiwan was transferred to in the 1951 San Francisco peace treaty, and the absence of explicit provisions on the return of Taiwan to China in the 1952 Treaty of Taipei. However Wang notes that this is a weak argument, citing 2 LASSA OPPENHEIMER, INTERNATIONAL LAW, under the principle of effective occupation and control, if nothing is stipulated on conquered territory in the peace treaty, the possessor may annex it. Still, the notion that a possessor may annex a conquered territory despite the peace treaty not stipulating so, was a means of territorial transfer recognized by classical international law, and its legality in recent years is either not recognized or disputed. According to Jian-De Shen, applying such a notion on the Republic of China's territorial claim for Taiwan is invalid because the conqueror of World War II is the whole body of the Allied Powers rather than the Republic of China alone.
    1
  4504. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greensill_Capital Greensill Capital is another mismanaged company with a toxic debt chain. Exposure to GFG Alliance Until its insolvency, Greensill Capital, along with its German subsidiary Greensill Bank, had a significant exposure to GFG Alliance, a group of businesses associated with steel magnate Sanjeev Gupta. The exposure of Lex Greensill's firms to GFG Alliance totalled $5 billion.[26][27] Conversely, GFG Alliance depended heavily on financing by Greensill Capital to conduct its operations.[27] GFG Alliance relied especially on Greensill Capital's future accounts receivables finance program.[27][21] According to the Financial Times, defaults by GFG Alliance are partly responsible for Greensill Capital's ultimate insolvency.[28] On March 8, 2021, Bloomberg reported that GFG Alliance believed it would become insolvent if Greensill collapsed and had defaulted on some of its bonds.[29] In 2020, the German financial regulator BaFin opened an investigation into Greensill Bank's accounting. In March 2021, BaFin filed a criminal complaint against Greensill Bank and banned activity at the bank.[30][31][32] Insolvency In July 2020, a group of insurers led by Tokio Marine, which were insuring $4.6 billion of its working capital, announced to Greensill that it would stop providing the coverage.[19][33] The decision came after Tokio Marine discovered that an employee at one of its subsidiaries had provided coverage that exceeded its risk limits. Greensill tried to obtain an extension of the coverage, including by taking legal action against the insurers, but was ultimately unsuccessful.[33][21] After this failure, Greensill attempted to secure insurance from other firms, but did not succeed.[6] On March 1, 2021, Credit Suisse froze $10 billion in funds that were invested in Greensill's financial products and held by its supply-chain investment funds.[14][34] According to the Financial Times, "Credit Suisse’s concerns about the funds came to a head because insurance policies covering defaults in a portion of its assets lapsed over the weekend."[34] According to the Wall Street Journal, Credit Suisse was also concerned with Greensill's large exposure to companies tied to steel magnate Sanjeev Gupta.[14] In March 2021, Greensill considered filing for insolvency after the Credit Suisse freeze.[35] On March 1, 2021 The Wall Street Journal reported that Greensill appointed Grant Thornton to help it during a possible restructuring or insolvency filing which was expected to happen within a few days.[14] On March 2, Greensill Capital announced that it was considering selling the operating part of its business, according to a report by Bloomberg News, to Apollo Global Management or an associated firm, Athene Holdings. Greensill Capital stated the firms had a "period of exclusivity with a leading global financial institution with a view to concluding a transaction with them this week," regarding the sale.[36] On March 12th, it was announced that the deal with Athene had fallen through.[37] The deal collapsed in part due to the low value of Greensill's assets, which were further reduced by the preservation of technology firm Taulia, through a partnership between Taulia, JPMorgan Chase, and other banks.[38][39] Taulia facilitates lending from several finance companies to clients, but counted Greensill as a major source of business. With Greensill's role as a lender through Taulia taken over by JPMorgan, Athene had fewer reasons to acquire Greensill's book of business. On March 8, 2021, Greensill filed for insolvency protection, as it found itself unable to repay a $140 million loan to Credit Suisse and was "hit by defaults" from Sanjeev Gupta's GFG Alliance, one of its main customers.[2][28] Lawsuits and repercussions On March 15, 2021, Bluestone Resources Inc., a coal mining company owned by West Virginia governor Jim Justice, sued Greensill for fraud. It alleges that Greensill departed from standard supply chain finance to engage in a more speculative practice, offering loans not only based on debts that other companies had already incurred, but also based on transactions that Greensill predicted would occur in the future.[40][41] A number of German towns and cities pulled their money from small, private banks after losing millions of euros in the closure of Greensill.[42]
    1
  4505. 1
  4506. 1
  4507. 1
  4508. 1
  4509. 1
  4510. 1
  4511. 1
  4512. 1
  4513. 1
  4514. 1
  4515. 1
  4516. 1
  4517. 1
  4518. 1
  4519. 1
  4520. 1
  4521. 1
  4522. 1
  4523. 1
  4524. 1
  4525. 1
  4526. 1
  4527. 1
  4528. 1
  4529. 1
  4530. 1
  4531. 1
  4532. 1
  4533. 1
  4534. 1
  4535. 1
  4536. 1
  4537. 1
  4538. 1
  4539. 1
  4540. 1
  4541. 1
  4542. 1
  4543. 1
  4544. 1
  4545. 1
  4546. 1
  4547. 1
  4548. 1
  4549. 1
  4550. 1
  4551. 1
  4552. 1
  4553. 1
  4554. 1
  4555. 1
  4556. 1
  4557. 1
  4558. 1
  4559. 1
  4560. 1
  4561. 1
  4562. 1
  4563. 1
  4564. 1
  4565. 1
  4566. 1
  4567. 1
  4568. 1
  4569. 1
  4570. 1
  4571. 1
  4572. 1
  4573. 1
  4574. 1
  4575. 1
  4576. 1
  4577. 1
  4578. 1
  4579. 1
  4580. 1
  4581. 1
  4582. 1
  4583. 1
  4584. 1
  4585. 1
  4586. 1
  4587. 1
  4588. 1
  4589. 1
  4590. 1
  4591. 1
  4592. 1
  4593. 1
  4594. 1
  4595. 1
  4596. 1
  4597. 1
  4598. 1
  4599. 1
  4600. 1
  4601. 1
  4602.  @tracer7898 For Iraq issue Date: December 2005, Dutch dealer gets 15 years for chemical sales to Saddam. A Dutch businessman was yesterday jailed for 15 years after a court in The Hague found him guilty of complicity in war crimes for selling chemicals to Iraq that Saddam Hussein's regime used in lethal gas attacks on Kurdish villages. -------- Iraq invaded Kuwait, fool Sheikhdom of Kuwait BEFORE WW1 Kuwait was founded in 1613 AD as a fishing village known as Grane (Kureyn). The region soon came under the rule of the Bani Khalid Emirate in 1670 after the expulsion of the Ottomans from Eastern Arabia (Lahsa Eyalet) by Barrack bin Ghurayr, Emir of the Bani Khalid, who successfully besieged the Ottoman governor Umar Pasha who surrendered and gave up his rule as the fourth Ottoman governor of al-Hasa. In 1752, Kuwait became independent after an agreement between the Sheikh of Kuwait and the Emir of Bani Khalid in which Bani Khalid recognised Sabah I bin Jaber's independent rule over Kuwait and in exchange Kuwait would not ally itself or support the enemies of Bani Khalid or interfere in the internal affairs of Bani Khalid in any way. -------- Report: Saudi Arabia Presses U.S. on Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Date: January 19, 1992 From AP NEWS NEW YORK (AP) _ Saudi Arabia is pressuring the Bush administration to secretly arm and give intelligence to Iraqi opposition forces so they can work to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a newspaper reported Sunday. The Saudis want the United States to give arms and intelligence to Kurdish rebels in north Iraq, Shiite Muslim fighters in the south and Sunni Muslim opposition forces in central Iraq, the Times said, quoting U.S. and allied officials it didn’t name. ------ Try again, fool
    1
  4603. 1
  4604. 1
  4605.  @tracer7898  >you never heard of WMD Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq
    1
  4606. 1
  4607. 1
  4608. 1
  4609. 1
  4610. 1
  4611. 1
  4612. 1
  4613. 1
  4614. 1
  4615. 1
  4616. 1
  4617. 1
  4618. 1
  4619. 1
  4620. 1
  4621. 1
  4622. 1
  4623. 1
  4624. 1
  4625. 1
  4626. 1
  4627. 1
  4628. 1
  4629. 1
  4630.  @PlaYer-sn5or  Against point 3, Your narrative is FALSE. Chiang Kai-Shek Supplementing The Act Of Surrender 1945 excluded Manchuria, Formosa, and French Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude. Order Of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-Shek Supplementing The Act Of Surrender 1945 This is order No. 1 of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek to the Japanese forces in China, excluding Manchuria, Formosa, and French Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude, which were surrendered under the act of 9 September 1945. This order supplements the acts of surrender to the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers and his General Order No. 1. September 9, 1945 Order of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek supplementing the Act of Surrender 9 September 1945 Immediately following the signing of the Act of Surrender ending the war in the China Theatre, General Ho Ying-chen handed Order No. 1 of Generalissimo Chiang to Lieut. Gen. Okamura Yasutsugu as a supplement to the Act of Surrender. I. This is order No. 1 of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek to the Japanese forces in China, excluding Manchuria, Formosa, and French Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude, which were surrendered under the act of 9 September 1945. This order supplements the acts of surrender to the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers and his General Order No. 1. II. The Japanese Commanders surrendering the Japanese forces in the areas named above will issue the following order to and insure compliance of such order by all forces under their command. 1. The Emperor of Japan, the Japanese government and the Japanese Imperial General Headquarters have recognized complete military defeat of the Japanese military forces by the Allied forces and have surrendered unconditionally all Japanese forces to the Allied Powers. 2. All the Japanese ground, sea, air, and auxiliary forces within China, excluding Manchuria, Formosa and Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude, have been surrendered unconditionally to Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek and henceforth all such surrendered Japanese forces will be subject to the control of the Generalissimo. Their movements and activities will be dictated by him, and they will obey only orders or proclamations issued or authorized by him, or orders of their Japanese commanders based upon his instructions. 3. The surrendered Japanese forces are now non-combatant troops and all hostilities will cease. All such Japanese forces will remain at the stations they now occupy and await further orders from the Generalissimo. They will assemble, preserve without damage, and turn over to forces specified by the Generalissimo all arms, ammunition, equipment, supplies, records, information and assets of any kind belonging to the Japanese forces and auxiliaries. 4. All Japanese aircraft, naval units and merchant ships in the areas named above will be held without damage where they are at present located, except those stated in the Generalissimo’s proclamation No. 1. Boats on the Yangtze will be assembled at Ichang. Explosives aboard vessels will be removed immediately to safe storage ashore. 5. Commanders of the Japanese military units and civilian auxiliaries will maintain discipline and order and will be responsible for the behaviour of their troops. They will see that their forces do not harm or molest inhabitants, or pillage, loot, or bring unauthorized damage to their property. 6. With respect to the United Nations prisoners of war and civilian internees in the hands of the Japanese or Japanese controlled authorities: 1. The safety and well being of all United Nations prisoners of war and civilian internees will be scrupulously preserved, to include the administrative and supply services essential to provide adequate food, shelter, clothing, and medical care until such responsibility is undertaken by the Generalissimo or his authorized representatives. 2. Each camp or other place of detention of United Nations prisoners of war and civilian internees together with its equipment, stores, records, arms, and ammunition will be delivered immediately to the command of the senior officer or designated representative of the prisoners of war and civilian internees. 3. As directed by the Generalissimo, or his duly authorized representatives, prisoners of war and civilian internees will be transported to places of safety where they can be accepted by Allied authorities. 4. The Supreme Headquarters in China, Formosa and Indochina of each of the Japanese military forces and auxiliaries which have surrendered to the Generalissimo will furnish him within time limit of this order, complete lists' of all United Nations prisoners of war and civilian internees indicating their location. 7. Pending further orders the Japanese forces surrendered to the Generalissimo will continue to operate their lines of services and supply essential to provide food, clothing, medical and other subsistence supplies to feed and supply their own forces and persons for whom they are responsible. 8. Responsible Japanese or Japanese controlled military and civil authorities will insure that: 1. All Japanese mines and minefields and other obstacles to movement by land, sea, and air, wherever located will be removed according to instructions of the Generalissimo or his representatives. 2. All safety lanes are to be kept open and clearly marked pending accomplishment of the above. 3. All land, water, and air transportation and communications facilities and equipment are to be held intact and maintained in good condition. 4. All military installations and establishment including airfields, seaplane bases, aircraft defences, ports and naval bases, storage depots, permanent and temporary land end coastal fortifications, fortresses, and other fortifications, installations and establishments, all factories, plants, ships, research institutions, laboratories, testing storage depots, permanent and plans, drawings and inventions designed or intended to produce or to facilitate the production on and of all implements of war and other material and property used by or intended for use by military or semi-military organizations in connection with its operations are to be held intact and maintained in good condition. III. The Supreme Headquarters in China, Formosa, and French Indo-China of the forces which have been surrendered to the Generalissimo within the time limit of the receipt of this order will furnish complete information for their respective areas concerning the following: 1. Lists of all land, air, and anti-aircraft units showing locations and strengths in officers and men. 2. Lists of all aircraft military, naval, and civil, giving complete information as to the number, type, location, and condition of such aircraft. 3. Lists of all Japanese and Japanese controlled naval vessels, surface and submarines and auxiliary naval craft in or out of commission and under construction, giving their position and condition. 4. List of, and position and condition of, all Japanese and Japanese controlled merchant ships of over 100 gross tonnes in or out of commission and under construction, including merchant ships formerly belonging to any of the United Nations which are now in the Japanese hands. 5. Complete and detailed information accompanied by maps, showing locations and layouts of all the mines, minefields, and other obstacles to movement by land, sea, or air, and the safety lanes in connection therewith. 6. Locations and descriptions of all military installations and establishments, including airfields, seaplane bases, anti-aircraft defenses, ports and naval bases, storage depots, permanent and temporary land and coast fortifications, fortresses and other fortified areas. 7. Location of all camps and other places of detention of United Nations prisoners of war and civilian internees required under paragraph II F above. IV. The Supreme Headquarters in China, Formosa, and Indo-China of the forces surrendered to the Generalissimo shall be prepared, on instructions from the occupation commanders representing the Generalissimo to furnish the names and addresses of Japanese civilians residing in their respective areas and to collect and deliver all arms in the possession of such Japanese civilian population. The Headquarters named above will immediately notify all Japanese civilians that until further notice from appropriate authorities representing the Generalissimo they will remain in the vicinity of their present residence and will keep the local Japanese commander advised of their whereabouts. CHIANG KAI-SHEK
    1
  4631. 1
  4632. 1
  4633. 1
  4634. 1
  4635. 1
  4636. 1
  4637. 1
  4638. 1
  4639. 1
  4640. 1
  4641. 1
  4642. 1
  4643. 1
  4644. 1
  4645. 1
  4646. 1
  4647. 1
  4648. 1
  4649. 1
  4650.  @marcomongke3116  The Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". --------------- In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical. USSR's proxy attempted to remove Chile's check-and-balance Congress system. USSR's proxy attempted to concentrate political power into a single entity (individual and political party). The US has no problems with the Swedish-style nanny market led-socialism that is practiced in the CANZUK and Nordic groups.
    1
  4651. 1
  4652. 1
  4653. 1
  4654. 1
  4655. 1
  4656. 1
  4657. 1
  4658. 1
  4659. 1
  4660. 1
  4661. 1
  4662. 1
  4663. 1
  4664. 1
  4665. 1
  4666. 1
  4667. 1
  4668. 1
  4669. 1
  4670. 1
  4671. 1
  4672.  @craigfrith7024  If you want a small population size and freedom of movement, there's NZ. Move to NZ if you want a small population size. The largest immigrant group comes from UK. The difference is British immigrants assimilate better than other ethnic groups. Pauline Hanson made a point on assimilation. Different cultures have different assimilation rates and results rediff.com/news/2008/jun/06spec.htm im.rediff.com/news/2008/jun/07look.jpg Immigrants from India and China are quick to assimilate into the economic fabric of the United States, but are not as quick when it comes to assimilating culturally and in civic matters, a study by Jacob Vigdor, associate professor of public policy studies and economics at Duke University, has found. Billed as the first annual Index of Immigrant Assimilation, the study measured three types of assimilation: economic (employment, education, homeownership); cultural (intermarriage, English proficiency, family size); and civic (citizenship rates, military service, voting). It then compared the assimilation rates of recent immigrants by country of origin, and found that immigrants from Vietnam, Cuba and the Philippines have the high ratings across the board. The overall assimilation index for all countries averages out to 28 on a scale of 100, but the index for India is under 20, and China only barely tops the 20 mark. Mexico rates 13 points, while Canada [Images] scores a high 53. "In terms of overall assimilation, immigrants from Mexico and Central America have index values below those of Indians; the index value for India is below that of China," Bridget Sweeny of the Manhattan Institute, a liberal think tank, said. Immigrants born in Canada, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Korea, the Philippines, and Vietnam have assimilation-index values higher than the national average of 28. 'This report introduces a quantitative index that measures the degree of similarity between native and foreign-born adults. It is the ability to distinguish the latter group from the former that we mean when we use the term assimilation,' the report said.
    1
  4673. 1
  4674. 1
  4675. 1
  4676. 1
  4677. 1
  4678. 1
  4679. 1
  4680. 1
  4681. 1
  4682. 1
  4683. 1
  4684. 1
  4685. 1
  4686. 1
  4687. 1
  4688. 1
  4689. 1
  4690. 1
  4691. 1
  4692. 1
  4693. 1
  4694. 1
  4695. 1
  4696. 1
  4697. 1
  4698. 1
  4699. 1
  4700. 1
  4701. 1
  4702. 1
  4703. 1
  4704. 1
  4705. 1
  4706. 1
  4707. 1
  4708. 1
  4709. 1
  4710. 1
  4711. 1
  4712. 1
  4713. 1
  4714. 1
  4715. 1
  4716. 1
  4717. 1
  4718. 1
  4719. 1
  4720. 1
  4721. 1
  4722. 1
  4723. 1
  4724. 1
  4725. 1
  4726. 1
  4727. 1
  4728. 1
  4729. 1
  4730. 1
  4731. 1
  4732. 1
  4733. 1
  4734. 1
  4735. 1
  4736. 1
  4737. 1
  4738. 1
  4739. 1
  4740. 1
  4741. 1
  4742. 1
  4743. 1
  4744. 1
  4745. 1
  4746. 1
  4747. 1
  4748. 1
  4749. 1
  4750. 1
  4751. 1
  4752. 1
  4753. 1
  4754. 1
  4755. 1
  4756. 1
  4757. 1
  4758. 1
  4759. 1
  4760. 1
  4761. 1
  4762. 1
  4763. 1
  4764. 1
  4765. 1
  4766. 1
  4767. 1
  4768. 1
  4769. 1
  4770. 1
  4771. 1
  4772. 1
  4773. 1
  4774. 1
  4775. 1
  4776. 1
  4777. 1
  4778. 1
  4779. Employees of Greenland Australia, a subsidiary of the Chinese government-backed global property giant Greenland Group, were instructed to put their normal work on hold and source bulk supplies of essential medical items to ship back to China. CCP sleepers directly interfered with AU medical supplies during 1st wave COVID-19 outbreak. --- CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  4780. 1
  4781. 1
  4782. 1
  4783. 1
  4784. 1
  4785. 1
  4786. 1
  4787. 1
  4788. 1
  4789. 1
  4790. 1
  4791. 1
  4792. 1
  4793. 1
  4794. 1
  4795. 1
  4796. 1
  4797. 1
  4798. 1
  4799. 1
  4800.  @bobbuliniusbotulismus7129  Note that China has a "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" which is known as CCP's protectionist list. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China's anti-foreign Market Access Negative List resulted in Australia's reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  4801.  @thomasoloughlin9075  From funding-tracker-who-s-sending-aid-to-ukraine-102887 European Union The European Union announced two major packages of €330 million ($353 million) and €500 million ($535 million) in humanitarian funding early in the war. It also co-hosted a pledging summit for Ukraine with the international movement Global Citizen and the Canadian government, at which the EU pledged €600 million to support Ukraine itself, and another €400 million to support other countries that have taken on Ukrainian refugees. In addition to humanitarian grant funding, the EU has provided several packages of loans and other finance, both directly and through the European Investment Bank. Meanwhile, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, which is partially owned by EIB and by the EU and its member countries, has made €2 billion in loan finance available. United States The U.S. government has announced several packages of emergency funding for Ukraine, with the latest worth $40 billion, split relatively evenly between military support and humanitarian aid, according to The New York Times. Many details of the spending are still to be fleshed out, and updates will be recorded on Devex’s Funding Platform when more is known about how the humanitarian funding will be channeled. The Devex Funding Platform also includes other announcements from the U.S. government, including a $1 billion commitment from earlier this year. United Kingdom The U.K. has committed a total of £1.5 billion ($1.7 billion) in humanitarian and economic support for Ukraine, according to a government website. It has sent another £2.3 billion of military aid. Germany Germany’s leaders have faced criticism for not supplying enough arms to Ukraine and for taking a more cautious approach to the possible defeat of Russia. However, Germany has been relatively generous in supplying aid, with a recent €1 billion grant. ------ EU's funding for Ukraine is small when compared to the UK and US. Keep it in context.
    1
  4802. 1
  4803. 1
  4804. 1
  4805. 1
  4806. 1
  4807. 1
  4808. 1
  4809. 1
  4810. 1
  4811. 1
  4812. 1
  4813. 1
  4814.  @briananderson7285  https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/2012-10/Lima%20Declaration%20and%20Plan%20of%20Action%20on%20Industrial%20Development%20and%20Co-operation_26.3.1975_0.PDF Quote from LIMA 27. That countries, particularly developed countries, should undertake an objective and critical examination of their present policies and make appropriate changes in such policies so as to facilitate the expansion and diversification of imports from developing countries and thereby make possible international economic relations on a rational, just and equitable basis; 28. That, in view of the low percentage share of the developing countries in total world industrial production, recalling General Assembly resolution 3306 (XX IX), of 14 December 1974, and taking into account the policy guidelines and qualitative recommendations made in the present Declaration. their share should be increased to the maximum possible extent and as far as possible to at least 25 per cent of total world industrial production by the year 2000, while making every endeavour to ensure that the industrial growth so achieved is distributed among the developing countries as evenly as possible. This implies that the developing countries should increase their industrial growth at a rate considerably higher than the 8 per cent recommended in the International Development Strategy for the Second United Nations Development Decade ------------------------ LIMA "increased to the maximum possible extent and as far as possible to at least 25 per cent of total world industrial production by the year 2000" statement was designed to disarm resistance against LIMA's goals.
    1
  4815. 1
  4816. 1
  4817. 1
  4818. 1
  4819. 1
  4820. 1
  4821. 1
  4822. 1
  4823. 1
  4824. 1
  4825. 1
  4826. 1
  4827. 1
  4828. 1
  4829. 1
  4830. 1
  4831. 1
  4832. 1
  4833. The Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". --------------- In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical. USSR's proxy attempted to remove Chile's check-and-balance Congress system. USSR's proxy attempted to concentrate political power into a single entity (individual and political party).
    1
  4834. 1
  4835. 1
  4836. 1
  4837. 1
  4838. 1
  4839. 1
  4840. 1
  4841. 1
  4842. 1
  4843. 1
  4844. 1
  4845. 1
  4846. 1
  4847. 1
  4848. 1
  4849.  @kaneidareyue7715  Formosa is not China's Hawaii. Chiang Kai-Shek Supplementing The Act Of Surrender 1945 excluded Manchuria, Formosa, and French Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude. Order Of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-Shek Supplementing The Act Of Surrender 1945 This is order No. 1 of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek to the Japanese forces in China, excluding Manchuria, Formosa, and French Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude, which were surrendered under the act of 9 September 1945. This order supplements the acts of surrender to the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers and his General Order No. 1. September 9, 1945 Order of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek supplementing the Act of Surrender 9 September 1945 Immediately following the signing of the Act of Surrender ending the war in the China Theatre, General Ho Ying-chen handed Order No. 1 of Generalissimo Chiang to Lieut. Gen. Okamura Yasutsugu as a supplement to the Act of Surrender. I. This is order No. 1 of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek to the Japanese forces in China, excluding Manchuria, Formosa, and French Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude, which were surrendered under the act of 9 September 1945. This order supplements the acts of surrender to the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers and his General Order No. 1. II. The Japanese Commanders surrendering the Japanese forces in the areas named above will issue the following order to and insure compliance of such order by all forces under their command. 1. The Emperor of Japan, the Japanese government and the Japanese Imperial General Headquarters have recognized complete military defeat of the Japanese military forces by the Allied forces and have surrendered unconditionally all Japanese forces to the Allied Powers. 2. All the Japanese ground, sea, air, and auxiliary forces within China, excluding Manchuria, Formosa and Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude, have been surrendered unconditionally to Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek and henceforth all such surrendered Japanese forces will be subject to the control of the Generalissimo. Their movements and activities will be dictated by him, and they will obey only orders or proclamations issued or authorized by him, or orders of their Japanese commanders based upon his instructions. 3. The surrendered Japanese forces are now non-combatant troops and all hostilities will cease. All such Japanese forces will remain at the stations they now occupy and await further orders from the Generalissimo. They will assemble, preserve without damage, and turn over to forces specified by the Generalissimo all arms, ammunition, equipment, supplies, records, information and assets of any kind belonging to the Japanese forces and auxiliaries. 4. All Japanese aircraft, naval units and merchant ships in the areas named above will be held without damage where they are at present located, except those stated in the Generalissimo’s proclamation No. 1. Boats on the Yangtze will be assembled at Ichang. Explosives aboard vessels will be removed immediately to safe storage ashore. 5. Commanders of the Japanese military units and civilian auxiliaries will maintain discipline and order and will be responsible for the behaviour of their troops. They will see that their forces do not harm or molest inhabitants, or pillage, loot, or bring unauthorized damage to their property. 6. With respect to the United Nations prisoners of war and civilian internees in the hands of the Japanese or Japanese controlled authorities: 1. The safety and well being of all United Nations prisoners of war and civilian internees will be scrupulously preserved, to include the administrative and supply services essential to provide adequate food, shelter, clothing, and medical care until such responsibility is undertaken by the Generalissimo or his authorized representatives. 2. Each camp or other place of detention of United Nations prisoners of war and civilian internees together with its equipment, stores, records, arms, and ammunition will be delivered immediately to the command of the senior officer or designated representative of the prisoners of war and civilian internees. 3. As directed by the Generalissimo, or his duly authorized representatives, prisoners of war and civilian internees will be transported to places of safety where they can be accepted by Allied authorities. 4. The Supreme Headquarters in China, Formosa and Indochina of each of the Japanese military forces and auxiliaries which have surrendered to the Generalissimo will furnish him within time limit of this order, complete lists' of all United Nations prisoners of war and civilian internees indicating their location. 7. Pending further orders the Japanese forces surrendered to the Generalissimo will continue to operate their lines of services and supply essential to provide food, clothing, medical and other subsistence supplies to feed and supply their own forces and persons for whom they are responsible. 8. Responsible Japanese or Japanese controlled military and civil authorities will insure that: 1. All Japanese mines and minefields and other obstacles to movement by land, sea, and air, wherever located will be removed according to instructions of the Generalissimo or his representatives. 2. All safety lanes are to be kept open and clearly marked pending accomplishment of the above. 3. All land, water, and air transportation and communications facilities and equipment are to be held intact and maintained in good condition. 4. All military installations and establishment including airfields, seaplane bases, aircraft defences, ports and naval bases, storage depots, permanent and temporary land-end coastal fortifications, fortresses, and other fortifications, installations and establishments, all factories, plants, ships, research institutions, laboratories, testing storage depots, permanent and plans, drawings and inventions designed or intended to produce or to facilitate the production on and of all implements of war and other material and property used by or intended for use by military or semi-military organizations in connection with its operations are to be held intact and maintained in good condition. III. The Supreme Headquarters in China, Formosa, and French Indo-China of the forces which have been surrendered to the Generalissimo within the time limit of the receipt of this order will furnish complete information for their respective areas concerning the following: 1. Lists of all land, air, and anti-aircraft units showing locations and strengths in officers and men. 2. Lists of all aircraft military, naval, and civil, giving complete information as to the number, type, location, and condition of such aircraft. 3. Lists of all Japanese and Japanese controllerd naval vessels, surface and submarines and auxiliary naval craft in or out of commission and under construction, giving their position and condition. 4. List of, and position and condition of, all Japanese and Japanese controlled merchant ships of over 100 gross tonnes in or out of commission and under construction, including merchant ships formerly belonging to any of the United Nations which are now in the Japanese hands. 5. Complete and detailed information accompanied by maps, showing locations and layouts of all the mines, minefields, and other obstacles to movement by land, sea, or air, and the safety lanes in connection therewith. 6. Locations and descriptions of all military installations and establishments, including airfields, seaplane bases, anti-aircraft defenses, ports and naval bases, storage depots, permanent and temporary land and coast fortifications, fortresses and other fortified areas. 7. Location of all camps and other places of detention of United Nations prisoners of war and civilian internees required under paragraph II F above. IV. The Supreme Headquarters in China, Formosa, and Indo-China of the forces surrendered to the Generalissimo shall be prepared, on instructions from the occupation commanders representing the Generalissimo to furnish the names and addresses of Japanese civilians residing in their respective areas and to collect and deliver all arms in the possession of such Japanese civilian population. The Headquarters named above will immediately notify all Japanese civilians that until further notice from appropriate authorities representing the Generalissimo they will remain in the vicinity of their present residence and will keep the local Japanese commander advised of their whereabouts. CHIANG KAI-SHEK
    1
  4850.  @kaneidareyue7715  >Taiwan though is a Chinese city that was taken by a losing side in a political civil war When KMT lost the civil war, Taiwan was an American occupation of Japanese Taiwan islands. The US tolerated the KMT government in exile in Taiwan. There are opposing views on the legality of the KMT takeover of Taiwan. The Chinese Communist government maintains to this day that the Republic of China in Taiwan is a province that must eventually return to rule by the mainland. According to an article published in 1955 on the legal status of Taiwan, "It has been charged that Chiang Kai-shek has no claim to the island because he is 'merely a fugitive quartering his army' there and besides, his is a government in exile." Moreover, the Treaty of San Francisco, which was officially signed by 48 nations on 8 September 1951, did not specify to whom Japan was ceding Taiwan and the Pescadores. Despite this, the ROC was viewed by the vast majority of states at the time as the legitimate representative of China, as it had succeeded the Qing Dynasty, while the PRC was at the time a mostly unrecognized state. Japan was, at the time of the signing of the Treaty of San Francisco, still technically under American occupation. After full independence, Japan established full relations with the ROC and not the PRC. According to Professor Gene Hsiao, "since the San Francisco Peace Treaty and the separate KMT treaty with Japan did not specify to whom Japan was ceding Taiwan and the Pescadores, the implication of the U.S. position was that legally, and insofar as the signatories of those two treaties were concerned, Taiwan became an 'ownerless' island and the KMT, by its own assent to the American policy, a foreign government-in-exile." Technically, KMT is a foreign government in exile under the American occupation of Japanese Taiwan islands. President Xi's claims over Taiwan follow Imperial China's imperialist Ten Great Campaigns. Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns' Taiwan conquest phase wasn't completed on the eve of the 1894 Sino-Japanese War.
    1
  4851. 1
  4852. 1
  4853. 1
  4854. 1
  4855. 1
  4856. 1
  4857. 1
  4858. 1
  4859. 1
  4860. 1
  4861. 1
  4862. 1
  4863. 1
  4864. 1
  4865. 1
  4866. 1
  4867. 1
  4868. 1
  4869. 1
  4870. 1
  4871. 1
  4872. 1
  4873. 1
  4874. 1
  4875. 1
  4876. 1
  4877. 1
  4878. 1
  4879. 1
  4880. 1
  4881. 1
  4882. 1
  4883. 1
  4884. 1
  4885. 1
  4886. 1
  4887. 1
  4888. 1
  4889. 1
  4890. 1
  4891. 1
  4892. 1
  4893. 1
  4894. 1
  4895. 1
  4896. 1
  4897. 1
  4898. 1
  4899. 1
  4900. 1
  4901. 1
  4902. 1
  4903. 1
  4904. 1
  4905. 1
  4906. 1
  4907. 1
  4908. 1
  4909. 1
  4910. 1
  4911. 1
  4912. 1
  4913. 1
  4914. 1
  4915. 1
  4916. 1
  4917. 1
  4918. 1
  4919. 1
  4920. 1
  4921. 1
  4922. 1
  4923. 1
  4924. 1
  4925. 1
  4926. 1
  4927. 1
  4928. 1
  4929. 1
  4930. 1
  4931. 1
  4932. 1
  4933. 1
  4934. 1
  4935. 1
  4936. 1
  4937. 1
  4938. 1
  4939. 1
  4940. 1
  4941. 1
  4942. 1
  4943. 1
  4944. 1
  4945. 1
  4946. 1
  4947. 1
  4948. 1
  4949. 1
  4950. 1
  4951. 1
  4952. 1
  4953. 1
  4954. 1
  4955. 1
  4956. 1
  4957. 1
  4958. 1
  4959. 1
  4960. 1
  4961. 1
  4962. 1
  4963. 1
  4964. 1
  4965. 1
  4966.  @yfelwulf  https://www.forbes.com/sites/douglasbulloch/2016/10/12/protectionism-may-be-rising-around-the-world-but-in-china-it-never-went-away/#5dc3f5df73da Protectionism May Be Rising Around The World, But In China It Never Went Away Promises unkept? Since joining the WTO in 2001, China has repeatedly insisted that it will live up to those undertakings made on entry. In particular, the use of currency manipulation has been identified by the US as a breech of the commitment to end price controls for the purposes of protecting domestic industries. This became a major political issue from 2005 onwards, and has only recently subsided because it is assumed that the RMB is slightly overvalued on the market. Nevertheless, for years it was deliberate policy for the PBoC to accumulate US Dollars and suppress the exchange rate for the RMB, resulting in exactly the price distortions China had committed to eliminate in 2001, and fuelling an enormous trade surplus with the US, which persists and expands to this day. Furthermore TRIPS implementation has been given some effect on paper, but has made little progress when it comes to 'enforcement.' This is (according to the WTO) as recently as February 2015, fully 14 years after TRIPS was supposed to be already in effect. The US Trade Representative produces an annual report to Congress on China's WTO compliance which leaves little room to conclude they have so far lived up to their accession commitments. The most recent several-hundred-page document - produced in December 2015 - recites a long list of small measures, committees established, announcements made and new administrative complications faced, all continuing disputes over an agreement theoretically in effect since 2001. Although, therefore, protectionism is rising around the world, it is also true to say that existing practices of protectionism have not fallen in the way that they should have since China's accession to the WTO in 2001. Because of this lack of progress in easing trade, the extended period of currency manipulation, the lack of observance of TRIPS and the sheer administrative resistance exporters face when trying to get their products into China, we now face of world of highly unbalanced trade, and rising mistrust. And it is this that is leading to rising protectionism; the simple fact that it never went away. --------
    1
  4967.  @yfelwulf  Note that China has a "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" which is known as CCP's protectionist list. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. ------------------------ China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  4968. 1
  4969. 1
  4970. 1
  4971. 1
  4972. 1
  4973. 1
  4974. 1
  4975. 1
  4976. 1
  4977. 1
  4978. 1
  4979. 1
  4980. 1
  4981. 1
  4982. 1
  4983. 1
  4984. 1
  4985. 1
  4986. 1
  4987. 1
  4988. 1
  4989. 1
  4990. 1
  4991. 1
  4992. 1
  4993. 1
  4994. 1
  4995. 1
  4996. 1
  4997. 1
  4998. 1
  4999. 1
  5000. 1
  5001. 1
  5002. 1
  5003. 1
  5004. 1
  5005.  @radiopete7290  Date: 22 Oct 2021 NSW Supreme Court dismisses challenges to vaccine mandates The Supreme Court of New South Wales has upheld a number of public health orders that require employees of particular industries to be vaccinated against COVID-19, dismissing challenges made by a number of health, aged care, education and construction workers in the State Background The spread of the Delta variant of COVID-19 caused lengthy lockdowns to be imposed across NSW, and the message conveyed by the NSW Government was that the only way out of lockdown would be through the mass vaccination of the eligible population. In addition to announcing that only fully vaccinated people would be able to enjoy additional freedoms when the state reopened, Health Minister Brad Hazard (“the Minister”) passed a number of public health orders (“the Orders”) which imposed requirements on workers in the health, aged care, education and construction industries, and additionally on workers that live in a Local Government Area (“LGA”) of concern and leave that LGA to perform authorised work, to be vaccinated against COVID-19 within various timeframes. The Orders require employers of such workers to obtain evidence of their workforce’s vaccination status, and prevent employers from offering work to employees that do not comply with the Orders. The Minister made these Orders under section 7(2) of the Public Health Act 2010 (“the PHA”), which empowers the Minister to make such directions to reduce or remove public health risks and to control movement to and from areas subject to public health risks. A total of ten workers across the health, aged care, education and construction industries, who had made the choice not to get vaccinated, challenged the validity of the Orders in the Supreme Court of New South Wales (“the Court”). The challenges were heard together, and the Court published its decision in the single judgment of Kassam v Hazzard; Henry v Hazzard [2021] NSWSC 1320 (“the Decision”) on 15 October 2021. The Orders In the context of the 107-day lockdown imposed on the Greater Sydney Area and countless regional lockdowns across NSW, the Minister implemented a number of public health orders under the PHA, including the following: Public Health (COVID-19 Additional Restrictions for Delta Outbreak) Order (No 2) – which provided that an authorised worker that lived in an LGA of concern must have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine by 30 August 2021, and that construction workers must have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine by 23 September 2021; Public Health (COVID–19 Care Services) Order 2021– which provides that aged care workers must have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine by 17 September 2021, and be fully vaccinated by 31 October 2021; Public Health (COVID–19 Vaccination of Education and Care Workers) Order 2021 (– which provides that education workers must be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 by 8 November 2021; and Public Health (COVID-19 Vaccination of Health Care Workers) Order 2021 – which provides that healthcare workers must have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine by 30 September 2021, and be fully vaccinated by 30 November 2021. While the first of these Orders has now been repealed due to the Government lifting additional restrictions on LGAs of concern, the remainder are still in effect. Each of the Orders require that employers in these industries must collect and maintain a record of the vaccination status of their employees. Section 10 of the PHA prescribes that it is an offence to fail to comply with a public health order; and penalties for non-compliance include fines of up to $11,000 or six months’ imprisonment for individuals or $55,000 fines for corporations, plus additional fines for repeated non-compliance. This means that both employees and employers that do not comply with the Orders may face punishment. The Plaintiffs’ Arguments The plaintiffs that disputed the Orders made a number of arguments as to why they thought the Orders were invalid and should be quashed by the Court. The reasons put forward by the plaintiffs were as follows: The Minister did not undertake any real exercise of power in making the Orders; The Orders are an unreasonable exercise of the power of section 7 of the PHA because of the effect on the right to bodily autonomy of workers that did not wish to be vaccinated; The Orders confer powers on police officers that are inconsistent with the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW); The Orders, and section 7 of the PHA, must be rendered invalid as they are inconsistent with section 51(xxxiiiA) of the Constitution (which prevents states from creating laws that have the effect of imposing a civil conscription on its citizens); The Minister failed to have regard to various relevant considerations, and failed to afford the plaintiffs natural justice when introducing the Orders; and/or The Orders are inconsistent with the Australian Immunisation Register Act 2015 (Cth) and are therefore invalid under section 109 of the Constitution (which prescribes that any State law which is inconsistent with Federal law shall be invalid). The plaintiff’s argument was heavily reliant on questioning the appropriateness of vaccinations, and reflected their general objections to receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. Principally, the plaintiffs contended that the Orders interfere with a person’s right to bodily integrity, and relied on evidence that supported alternative treatments, questioned the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, downplayed the severity of COVID-19, and asserted that COVID-19 vaccines are “experimental”. The Decision The Court rejected each argument put forward by the plaintiffs and dismissed the Proceedings. Justice Beech-Jones made the following findings with respect to the plaintiffs’ arguments: Section 7(2) of the PHA clearly authorises significant limitations on freedom of movement in the context of a public health risk, and the Minister acted within the powers vested by this section; The Orders do not violate any right to bodily integrity as they do not authorise that anyone be involuntarily vaccinated; rather, they restrict a person’s freedom of movement to varying levels dependent on whether that person is vaccinated or unvaccinated; The powers vested on police officers with respect to enforcing the Orders are not inconsistent with other State legislation; The Orders are not inconsistent with any provision of the Constitution; No duty to afford procedural fairness arose in the circumstances that the Orders were made, as the Orders affect a very wide class of persons; and The Orders are not inconsistent with any provision of Federal legislation. His Honour further noted that it was not the role of the Court to “conclusively resolve legitimate debates concerning the appropriate treatments for COVID-19 or the effectiveness of the vaccines”, and that such considerations are “matters of merits, policy and fact for the decision-maker” – in this case the Minister. As such, the plaintiffs’ evidence that generally questioned the efficacy and utility of COVID-19 vaccines was of little relevance to the Decision. ------------------------- Again, prove your argument in court in front of the judge!
    1
  5006. 1
  5007. 1
  5008. 1
  5009. 1
  5010. 1
  5011. 1
  5012. 1
  5013. 1
  5014. 1
  5015. 1
  5016. 1
  5017. 1
  5018. 1
  5019. 1
  5020. 1
  5021. 1
  5022. 1
  5023. 1
  5024. 1
  5025. 1
  5026. 1
  5027. 1
  5028. 1
  5029. 1
  5030. 1
  5031. 1
  5032. 1
  5033. 1
  5034. 1
  5035. 1
  5036. 1
  5037. 1
  5038. 1
  5039. 1
  5040. 1
  5041. 1
  5042. 1
  5043. 1
  5044. 1
  5045. 1
  5046. 1
  5047. 1
  5048. 1
  5049. 1
  5050. 1
  5051. 1
  5052. 1
  5053. 1
  5054.  @StofStuiver  >Yet is was the US that staged a coup in Ukrain and stoked division of Russian peoples. FALSE. Date: Jan. 7, 2010 Yanukovych: Ukraine will remain a neutral state. "It’s certain that Ukraine was and will be non-aligned state… We strive neither to join NATO nor the [CIS]CSTO [Collective Security Treaty Organization]. We’ll maintain a neutral status," Yanukovych said in an interview with the Komsomolskaya Pravda in Ukraine newspaper. -------- The trigger for Euromaidan was Yanukovych initiated non-neutrality policies such as joining a trade block instead of executing Switzerland-style neutrality. UK leaving the EU and joining CPTPP proves freedom of association. Before Euromaidan, Russia, however, has successfully used political and economic leverage to dissuade Ukraine from signing the E.U. deal. In the months prior to the Vilnius summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a trade war with Kiev, blocking nearly all imports from Ukraine and cutting energy supplies to the country. In turn, this reduced Ukrainian exports by 25 percent and shrank the economy by 1.5 percent. Some trade background for the context From Tradebarrier Index (lower score = less trade barriers) New Zealand's tariff score is 2.92 Australia's tariff score is 3.03 UK's tariff score is 3.94 (after Brexit) Japan's tariff score is 4.05 US's tariff score is 4.54 Germany's tariff score is 4.88 EU's tariff score is 4.88 Russia's tariff score is 6.16 <-------- China's tariff score is 6.8 <------ Russia wants to maintain its higher trade protectionist policies. You fukof,f go back to Russia.
    1
  5055. 1
  5056. 1
  5057. 1
  5058. 1
  5059. 1
  5060. 1
  5061. 1
  5062. 1
  5063. 1
  5064. 1
  5065. 1
  5066. 1
  5067. 1
  5068. 1
  5069. 1
  5070. 1
  5071. 1
  5072. 1
  5073. 1
  5074. 1
  5075. 1
  5076. 1
  5077. 1
  5078. 1
  5079. 1
  5080. 1
  5081. 1
  5082. 1
  5083. 1
  5084. 1
  5085. 1
  5086. 1
  5087. 1
  5088. 1
  5089. 1
  5090. 1
  5091. 1
  5092. 1
  5093. 1
  5094. 1
  5095. 1
  5096. Australia's One China policy is based on Jim Carter's One China policy. Q1: What is the U.S. “One China” policy? Why does it exist? A1: When the United States moved to recognize the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and de-recognize the Republic of China (ROC) in 1979, the United States stated that the government of the People’s Republic of China was “the sole legal Government of China.” Sole, meaning the PRC was and is the only China, with no consideration of the ROC as a separate sovereign entity. The United States did not, however, give in to Chinese demands that it recognize Chinese sovereignty over Taiwan (which is the name preferred by the United States since it opted to de-recognize the ROC). Instead, Washington acknowledged the Chinese position that Taiwan was part of China. For geopolitical reasons, both the United States and the PRC were willing to go forward with diplomatic recognition despite their differences on this matter. When China attempted to change the Chinese text from the original acknowledge to recognize, Deputy Secretary of State Warren Christopher told a Senate hearing questioner, “[W]e regard the English text as being the binding text. We regard the word ‘acknowledge’ as being the word that is determinative for the U.S.” In the August 17, 1982, U.S.-China Communique, the United States went one step further, stating that it had no intention of pursuing a policy of “two Chinas” or “one China, one Taiwan.” Q2: What is the U.S. position on who has sovereignty over Taiwan? A2: In the San Francisco Treaty of Peace of 1951, Japan renounced “all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores.” Neither the Republic of China nor the People’s Republic of China were parties to the treaty, and thus neither was declared a beneficiary of the Japanese renouncement. While President Richard Nixon’s private notes show him willing to recognize the status of Taiwan as determined and part of China, subsequent U.S. documents and statements show the United States as having no position on the Taiwan sovereignty question. The U.S. position regarding sovereignty over Taiwan remains steady and consistent with its “one China policy”: both sides of the Taiwan Strait should mutually and peacefully agree to a resolution of this as yet unsettled issue. The United States doesn’t agree with Beijing’s claim to sovereignty over Taiwan, nor does it agree with Taipei that the ROC is an independent, sovereign state.
    1
  5097. 1
  5098. 1
  5099. 1
  5100. 1
  5101. 1
  5102. 1
  5103. 1
  5104. 1
  5105. 1
  5106. 1
  5107. 1
  5108. 1
  5109. 1
  5110. 1
  5111. 1
  5112. 1
  5113. 1
  5114. 1
  5115. 1
  5116. 1
  5117. 1
  5118. 1
  5119. 1
  5120. 1
  5121. 1
  5122. 1
  5123. 1
  5124. 1
  5125. 1
  5126. 1
  5127. 1
  5128. 1
  5129. 1
  5130. 1
  5131. 1
  5132. 1
  5133. 1
  5134. 1
  5135. 1
  5136. 1
  5137. 1
  5138. 1
  5139. 1
  5140. 1
  5141. 1
  5142. 1
  5143. 1
  5144. 1
  5145. 1
  5146. 1
  5147. 1
  5148. 1
  5149. 1
  5150. 1
  5151. 1
  5152. 1
  5153. 1
  5154. 1
  5155. 1
  5156. 1
  5157. 1
  5158. 1
  5159. 1
  5160. 1
  5161. 1
  5162. 1
  5163. 1
  5164. 1
  5165. 1
  5166. 1
  5167. 1
  5168. 1
  5169. 1
  5170. 1
  5171. 1
  5172. 1
  5173. 1
  5174. 1
  5175. 1
  5176. 1
  5177. 1
  5178. 1
  5179. 1
  5180. 1
  5181. 1
  5182. 1
  5183. 1
  5184. 1
  5185. 1
  5186. 1
  5187. 1
  5188. 1
  5189. 1
  5190. 1
  5191.  @StraightShooter71  Prior to 2014 2007: Russian President Vladimir Putin visits Sydney (Australia) for APEC and agrees to 'Cooperation in the Use of Nuclear Energy for Peaceful Purposes' deal with then prime minister John Howard (Liberal-National Coalition). 2008: Australian joint parliamentary committee on treaties objects after Russia invades Georgia. 2010: Then prime minister Julia Gillard (Australian Labor party) endorses Nuclear Cooperation Agreement with Russia's president Dmitry Medvedev. 2012: Australian uranium shipment sent to St Petersburg as part of a trial. 2014: Then prime minister Tony Abbott (Liberal-National Coalition) bans uranium exports after Russian-back separatists in eastern Ukraine shot down Malaysia Airlines flight MH17. ----- 2007 The agreement between Australia and Russia was titled, 'Cooperation in the Use of Nuclear Energy for Peaceful Purposes' and the Labor Opposition supported at it the time with an election looming. While Australia is opposed to domestic nuclear energy, it hailed the prospect of 'assisting Russia to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and atmospheric pollution through the use of nuclear power, especially given Russia's high projected growth in electricity demand'. 'Russia is seeking secure, long-term sources of uranium to satisfy its expanding nuclear energy program,' the deal said. 'There is strong commercial interest in the long term amongst Australian uranium producers in supplying uranium to Russia. 'Russia is proposing at least a two-fold increase in its nuclear energy output by 2020.' 2010 Australia and Russia in November 2010 signed a Nuclear Cooperation Agreement with then prime minister Julia Gillard and president Dmitry Medvedev witnessing the deal in Seoul. 'In addition, it enabled Australian and Russian government officials to ensure that there was a common understanding of the administrative arrangements underpinning the nuclear cooperation agreement.' 2014 In September 2014, then prime minister Tony Abbott banned uranium exports to Russia after Russian-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine shot down Malaysia Airlines flight MH17, killing 298 people including 38 Australians. Australia's and Russia's relationship was warm until MH17.
    1
  5192. 1
  5193. 1
  5194. 1
  5195. 1
  5196. 1
  5197. 1
  5198. 1
  5199. 1
  5200. 1
  5201. 1
  5202. 1
  5203. 1
  5204. 1
  5205. 1
  5206. 1
  5207. 1
  5208. 1
  5209. 1
  5210. 1
  5211. 1
  5212. 1
  5213. 1
  5214. 1
  5215. 1
  5216. 1
  5217. 1
  5218. 1
  5219. 1
  5220. 1
  5221. 1
  5222. 1
  5223. 1
  5224. 1
  5225. 1
  5226. 1
  5227. 1
  5228. 1
  5229. 1
  5230. 1
  5231. 1
  5232. 1
  5233. 1
  5234. 1
  5235. 1
  5236. 1
  5237.  @tonyatgoogle6076  https://www.law.columbia.edu/node/5344/beyond-ownership-state-capitalism-and-chinese-firm-curtis-j-milhaupt-and-wentong-zheng For some mixed-ownership firms, classifying their ownership type is difficult also because of the way they are managed. A prominent example is ZTE Corporation (ZTE), China’s second largest telecommunication equipment manufacturer and the subject of a U.S. House Committee investigation in 2012. ZTE’s shares are listed on both the Shenzhen and Hong Kong Stock Exchanges. ZTE’s largest shareholder is ZTE Holdings, which owns 30.76% of ZTE’s shares (see Fig. 1).[9] Under both Chinese and Hong Kong law, 30% is the point at which a shareholder is considered to have acquired a large enough stake to trigger a mandatory tender offer requirement. The shares of ZTE Holdings, in turn, are held by Xi’an Microelectronics (34%), Aerospace Guangyu (17%), and Zhongxing WXT (49%). Xi’an Micro Electronics and Aerospace Guangyu are both SOEs. State-owned entities, therefore, control 51% of ZTE Holdings. https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/business-spectator/how-private-is-private-in-china-/news-story/d1496a69b87fdc6a7682cf91c0ae906a One other point is that Chinese private companies are very sensitive to popular nationalistic sentiment on issues – often stirred up by the authorities – and in some cases may also genuinely share the same views as Beijing. It was revealing, for example, how many of China’s leading ‘private’ technology companies, Baidu and Tencent, late last year took a very public stance in favour of China’s ownership of the contested Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands. Clearly leading Chinese private hi-tech companies are not averse to taking actions in support of the stance of Beijing that go beyond pure commercial decision-making.
    1
  5238. 1
  5239. 1
  5240. 1
  5241. 1
  5242. 1
  5243. 1
  5244. 1
  5245. 1
  5246. 1
  5247. 1
  5248. 1
  5249. 1
  5250. 1
  5251. 1
  5252. 1
  5253. 1
  5254. 1
  5255. 1
  5256. 1
  5257. 1
  5258. 1
  5259. 1
  5260. 1
  5261. 1
  5262. 1
  5263. 1
  5264. 1
  5265. 1
  5266. 1
  5267. 1
  5268. 1
  5269. 1
  5270. 1
  5271. 1
  5272. 1
  5273. 1
  5274. 1
  5275. 1
  5276. 1
  5277. 1
  5278. 1
  5279. 1
  5280. 1
  5281. 1
  5282. 1
  5283. 1
  5284.  @leighmoom5277  Your "Moratorium means suspension, not cancellation." argument is a red herring. https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/covid-19-genetic-network-analysis-provides-snapshot-of-pandemic-origins Study charts the 'incipient supernova' of COVID-19 through genetic mutations as it spread from China and Asia to Australia, Europe and North America Versions of ‘A’ were seen in Chinese individuals, and Americans reported to have lived in Wuhan, and mutated versions of ‘A’ were found in patients from the USA and Australia. Wuhan’s major virus type, ‘B’, was prevalent in patients from across East Asia. However, the variant didn’t travel much beyond the region without further mutations – implying a 'founder event' in Wuhan, or 'resistance' against this type of COVID-19 outside East Asia, say researchers. From https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2020/04/07/2004999117 has https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/early/2020/04/07/2004999117/F1.large.jpg Fig. 1. Phylogenetic network of 160 SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Node A is the root cluster obtained with the bat (R. affinis) coronavirus isolate BatCoVRaTG13 from Yunnan Province. Circle areas are proportional to the number of taxa, and each notch on the links represents a mutated nucleotide position. The sequence range under consideration is 56 to 29,797, with nucleotide position (np) numbering according to the Wuhan 1 reference sequence (8). The median-joining network algorithm (2) and the Steiner algorithm (9) were used, both implemented in the software package Network5011CS (https://www.fluxus-engineering.com/), with the parameter epsilon set to zero, generating this network containing 288 most-parsimonious trees of length 229 mutations. The reticulations are mainly caused by recurrent mutations at np11083. The 161 taxa (160 human viruses and one bat virus) yield 101 distinct genomic sequences. The phylogenetic diagram is available for detailed scrutiny in A0 poster format (SI Appendix, Fig. S5) and in the free Network download files.
    1
  5285. 1
  5286. 1
  5287. 1
  5288. 1
  5289. 1
  5290. 1
  5291. 1
  5292. 1