Comments by "Valen Ron" (@valenrn8657) on "'Forced penetration' of renewables 'destabilising entire power system'" video.

  1.  @svsdssp3196  Red herring argument with "In the middle of the desert and don't for a second think that is safe".
    2
  2.  @svsdssp3196  NSW already has a nuclear research reactor.
    1
  3.  @svsdssp3196  Opel nuclear reactor produces 20 MW of power and it needs water cooling.
    1
  4. I have midday reachable 3.5KW solar panels on my roof and it doesn't replace baseload power! That's without any work like running fish-n-chip shop energy usage.
    1
  5. Queensland has uranium. Mining uranium was banned in Queensland from 1989 to 2012. The ban was repealed by the Newman government, then the Palaszczuk government in 2015 announced that it would be reinstated
    1
  6. There's already a nuclear waste dump in South Australia.
    1
  7.  @brettst01  Thorium reactors are still in R&D phase not in deployment/production phase.
    1
  8. Fusion power is not working as base load solution.
    1
  9.  @svsdssp3196  R&D has higher risk and it would cost more than latest proven designs. Research fusion reactor has no business in production nuclear reactors.
    1
  10.  @svsdssp3196  https://www.environment.gov.au/climate-change/climate-science-data/climate-science/australian-climate-change-science The NESP is a long-term commitment to environment and climate research, with funding of $26 million per year during the life of the program.
    1
  11. Argentina has 3 nuclear reactors. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_by_country
    1
  12.  @svsdssp3196  Wrong, less wealthy Argentina has three nuclear reactors. Your argument is a red herring.
    1