Comments by "Valen Ron" (@valenrn8657) on "Senate motion condemning Bettina Arndt a 'complete freedom of speech violation'" video.

  1. Bettina was quoting somebody else i.e. it's not her speech. The real mistake from mainstream politicians and the news media is missing the quotation marks. LOL
    4
  2.  cooper copper  Race neutrality test failures from Leftist Democrats https://youtu.be/uqxzPnXhSo0?t=46 Democrats are still racist since they couldn't get race neutrality idea where skin color shouldn't be a factor, hence hypocrites https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=glKa_EI24RU Democrat's Tlaib is racist. Leftist Democrat examples have set a favored race over means of production. Jim Crows Laws 2.0 rebooted. Nationalist Socialism: State defined racial group in common control over the means of production which is the core idealogy for being a NAZI. Marxist Socialism: State defined class group in common control over the means of production.
    1
  3. NSW Anti-discrimination laws only applied to business and basic government services.
    1
  4.  @joeybrown3583  Read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_Discrimination_Act_1975 It is against the law to discriminate in areas such as: Employment (section 15) - e.g. when seeking employment, training, promotion, equal pay or conditions of employment; Land, housing or accommodation (section 12) - e.g. when buying a house or when renting; Provision of goods and services (section 13) - e.g. when buying something, applying for credit, using banks, seeking assistance from government departments, lawyers, doctors and hospitals, or attending restaurants, pubs, entertainment venues; Access to places and facilities for use by the public (section 11) - e.g. when trying to use parks, libraries, government offices, hotels, places of worship, entertainment centres, hire cars; Advertising (section 16) - e.g. advertising for a job stating that people from a certain ethnic group cannot apply; Joining a trade union (section 14). -------------- Racial_Discrimination_Act_1975 is applicable for businesses and government basic services.
    1
  5.  @joeybrown3583  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_18C_of_the_Racial_Discrimination_Act_1975 Defences to 18C are found under 18D of the Racial Discrimination Act.[6] Exemptions are made under Section 18D for: artistic works, academic, scientific or other purposes that are genuinely in the public interest, fair and accurate reporting, or fair comment that is an expression of genuine belief.[8]
    1
  6.  @joeybrown3583  Justice Mordecai Bromberg (the same Judge that wreaked Toyota's manufacturing business) removed Section 18D defense for Eatock v Bolt case. Justice Mordecai Bromberg is a leftist-activist judge. https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/judge-in-the-middle-of-controversy-yet-again/news-story/3a5ab5d743856f25b198c55e5f5b46cf https://www.smh.com.au/opinion/the-labor-lawyer-and-the-death-seal-20131218-2zlca.html Justice Mordecai ''Mordy'' Bromberg of the Federal Court of Australia probably signed the death warrant of the Australian vehicle manufacturing industry last Thursday when he helped ensure that Toyota Australia, with its costly work culture, has no future as a manufacturer here. Read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eatock_v_Bolt
    1
  7.  @joeybrown3583  To reform Section 18C On March 30 2017, the Australian Senate voted down changes to 18c with 31 votes; Labor, Greens, Lambie, Xenophon voting against and 28 votes Liberal, Derryn Hinch, One Nation, and Liberal Democrat for. ---------- For 2020 Senate (46th Parliament) Coalition: 36 ON: 2 Potential: 38 VS ALP: 26 CA (aka NXT): 2 Jacqui Lamie: 1 Green:9 Potential: 38
    1
  8.  @YukiPyro  Australia has S18C with S18D counterbalance, but there's a leftist-activist judge.
    1
  9.  Jason Poole  A racist = failed race neutrality test.
    1