Comments by "Valen Ron" (@valenrn8657) on "New Victorian legislation is the ‘cancellation’ of property owners’ rights" video.

  1.  @HelloWorld-ns7gt  Waterways are not "land". LOL
    1
  2. Note that Victoria's legislation has no jurisdiction in other states.
    1
  3. Note that Victoria's legislation has no jurisdiction in other states.
    1
  4.  @HelloWorld-ns7gt  Victoria's Riverside Crown Land legislation has a conflict with farm bio-security.
    1
  5.  @soulmage9  Prove it for NSW.
    1
  6.  @soulmage9  Read https://www.alrc.gov.au/publication/protections-from-statutory-encroachment-12/ Australian Constitution 7.33 this constitutional protection is significant and is regarded as a constitutional guarantee of property rights
    1
  7.  @HelloWorld-ns7gt  Waterways are not "land". LOL
    1
  8.  @HelloWorld-ns7gt  Permanent waterways are NOT dry "land".
    1
  9.  @HelloWorld-ns7gt  Read https://www.premier.vic.gov.au/have-your-say-riverside-crown-land-rules The statement "Rivers beaches and their banks are Retained Public space that cannot be sold leased or permanently locked from the public" is not completely true since the Victorian legatation needs to be pass to allow leased clown land's "rivers beaches and their banks" to be public spaces.
    1
  10. Don't eat food.
    1
  11.  @jackhughman9450  To address your "Fuck the farmers" statement, fuck you.
    1
  12. Waterways are not "land". LOL Victoria's Riverside Crown Land legislation has a conflict with farm bio-security.
    1
  13. Victoria's legislation is only applicable on leased crown (state) land in the state of Victoria. Some crown land is allocated to the federal government.
    1
  14. Victoria's legislation is only applicable on leased crown (state) land in the state of Victoria. Australia is a federation of member states.
    1