Comments by "Valen Ron" (@valenrn8657) on "Nuclear submarines for Australia just started a new Pacific military alliance against China!" video.

  1.  @hkfoo3333  China's punitive trade strategy against Australia is failing.
    10
  2.  @kirk2632  Your argument is hypocritical when CCP has aided Pakistan's and North Korea's nuclear adventure.
    8
  3.  @kunalnagarkoti1841  Australia and the US are also members of "The Quad" (Australia, Japan, India and US).
    6
  4.  @demun6065  To replace F-111C, the US offered the B-21 program to Australia.
    3
  5.  @romainlapie6362  France has backed Italy’s decision to block COVID-19 vaccine exports to Australia. UK supported COVID-19 vaccine shipments to Australia. Your real friends are revealed during difficult situations.
    3
  6.  @tomx641  BAe is already operating in Australia via the Type 26 builds.
    3
  7. Remember, China has given aid to Pakistan's nuclear technology.
    2
  8.  @BERSERCŒUR  Australia paid $2 billion to France and the output is nothing. $2.8 billion for Virginia-class Block V submarine per unit cost.
    2
  9.  @vigilantobserver8389  Chinese-owned Darwin Port is struggling to pay back debts.
    2
  10.  @lape2002  France sold two Mistral Warships to Egypt.
    2
  11.  M Y  Remember, China has given aid to North Korea's nuclear technology.
    1
  12.  M Y China has threatened Australia with a ballistic missile attack.
    1
  13.  M Y  China's threats are making the arguments for Australia's increased defense investments.
    1
  14.  @carrisasteveinnes1596  FYI, Australia's F-111C are armed with Israeli Popeye stand-off strike missiles.
    1
  15. The alliance is not new. Australia has two attempts with nuclear technology beyond research nuclear reactors. 1. Jervis Bay nuclear power plant, killed by Gough Whitlam's Labor party in the 1970s. 2. ANSTO centrifuge enrichment technology, killed by Bob Hawke/Paul Keating's Labor party in the mid-1980s.
    1
  16. Reminder, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yX5rZVH-9hY China claims ownership of a Russian city.
    1
  17.  @andrewjohnwilliams6951  Which post are you referring to?
    1
  18.  @hkfoo3333  Indonesia already has three experimental nuclear reactors.
    1
  19.  @U9DATE  China's threats are making the arguments for Australia's increased defense investments.
    1
  20.  @hkfoo3333  It's nuclear-powered submarines NOT nuclear-armed submarines. The nuclear component for submarines is used to generate electricity.
    1
  21.  @hkfoo3333  False, Refer to Brazil's $7.8 billion SSN with tech aid from France.
    1
  22.  @hkfoo3333  The Australian government has not joined the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, a relatively new agreement that requires parties not to develop, test, produce, acquire, possess, stockpile, use or threaten to use nuclear weapons.
    1
  23.  @hkfoo3333  Non-Proliferation Treaty refers to the making of the nuclear bomb NOT nuclear power electrical generation.
    1
  24.  @hkfoo3333  Wrong, NPT is about making bombs NOT generating electricity. Try again.
    1
  25.  @hkfoo3333  China already making missile ballistic threats BEFORE Australia's nuclear-powered submarine announcement. Your CCP threats are making the argument for Australia's increased defense investments. LOL
    1
  26.  @Conan-ny1um  BAe is already operating in Australia via the Type 26 builds.
    1