Comments by "Valen Ron" (@valenrn8657) on "The Real Life Sci-Fi of Vertical Take-Off Planes" video.

  1. This is for F-35A Block 3F since December 2017 http://www.luke.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/1386133/lukes-newest-amu-supports-f-35-program/ "The unit is the first Luke F-35 AMU to receive a 3F, or full-up, combat aircraft capable of pulling 9G’s in the air."
    4
  2. kristenburnout1, false. If you read http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/666042.pdf at page 25 shows the breakdown for $916.3 billion (JPO) or 1020 billion (CAPE) estimate $916.3 / 56 years = $16.36 billion per year. $1020.3 / 56 years = $18.21 billion per year. http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/us_welfare_spending_40.html US spends about $500.3 billion USD/fiscal year on welfare which is significantly larger than F-35's $16.36 billion per year rate.
    3
  3. Garret Jacobs, NASA has zero output in regards to combat capable flying units. If there's going to be welfare, make sure it's productive, not dead money.
    2
  4. Garret Jacobs Fiscal year 2017 spending bill early May 1 provide NASA with $19.65 billion.
    1