Comments by "Valen Ron" (@valenrn8657) on "VisualPolitik EN" channel.

  1. 32
  2. 14
  3. 14
  4.  @antoniomromo  That's a false equivalence. Unlike Russia, the US did NOT assimilate Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, and Yugoslavia into US federal structure. >Yugoslavia 9 February 1994: At UN request, NATO agreed to authorise air strikes, declared 20 km total exclusion zone around Sarajevo and required Bosnian Serbs to withdraw heavy weapons from zone or place them under UN control within 10 days; also called on Bosnian Government to place heavy weapons in Sarajevo under UN control. Agreement between 'RS' and Bosnian Government to a ceasefire in Sarajevo, negotiated by Lieutenant-General Sir Michael Rose, then Commander of UN forces in Bosnia. UN Security Council through UNSCR 836 of 4 June 1994 authorizes the use of air power to defend the safe areas created by UN Security Council resolution 824 of 6 May 1993. >Libya NATO STOPPED the bloody civil war in Libya. Putin STARTED the bloody war in Ukraine. On 16 August 2003, Libya formally admitted responsibility for Pan Am Flight 103 (Lockabie bombing) in a letter presented to the president of the United Nations Security Council. "On 10 March 2011, France was the first country in the world to recognise the National Transitional Council as the legitimate government of Libya". United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 was adopted by the United Nations Security Council on 17 March 2011 in response to the First Libyan Civil War. The Security Council resolution was proposed by France, Lebanon, and the United Kingdom. Muammar Gaddafi played stupid games and win stupid prizes. The US supported France(EU)'s and UK(EU)'s, and Lebanon's United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973. NATO wasn't used until United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 since it was vetoed by Turkey. >Iraq Facts: Iraq started the hot war against Kuwait. Iraq attempted to annex Kuwait. If a country attempted to annex another country, the invading country that attempted to enlarge its territory (expansionist nationalism) should be prepared to be annexed by another country. Don't cry to me about moral superiority when Iraq doesn't have this position in the first place! If you can't handle the heat, don't start a hot war in the 1st place.
    11
  5. 9
  6. 9
  7.  @claudiopereira9900  Timeline of Yugoslav breakup 22 January 1990: Slovenian, Croatian and Macedonian delegates abandon the last Congress of the Communist League of Yugoslavia. The Communist Party of Yugoslavia is dissolved. 1 July 1990: The Parliament of Slovenia votes to declare independence (but independence is not proclaimed). 1 October 1990: George Bush, in a meeting with the Yugoslav president of the Presidency, gives full support to Yugoslavia. 21 February 1991: After receiving news of the Slovenian parliament's decision to start legal actions for independence and for the possible creation of new union of independent states, the Croatian parliament makes a similar decision. 25 September 1991: Macedonia declares independence. 8 October 1991: Croatia declares independence from Yugoslavia. 2 December 1991: President of Macedonia sends an official letter to the presidents of the foreign governments asking for recognition of the independence of Macedonia. Immediately after that Greece starts military provocations on the Macedonian-Greece border. 11 December 1991: Ukraine recognizes Croatia. ... 19 December 1991: Germany announces that it will recognize Croatia on January 15, 1992, with or without the rest of the European Community. 23 December 1991: Germany becomes the first major power to recognize Croatia and Slovenia as independent states 15 January 1992: The European Community recognizes Slovenia and Croatia. 21 February 1992: United Nations Security Council Resolution 743 sets up a Protection Force (UNPROFOR) mandated to create three IJN Protected Areas (UNPAs) in Croatia. ----- GERMANY has pushed NATO and the EU to smash Yugoslavia when Germany failed to smash Serbia in WW1 and WW2 goals. Your narrative is NOT based on facts! Your narrative is based on separating Germany from the US so that Russia can take on Germany, again. Without NATO, Germany would have done it alone and we would have another WW1 trigger i.e. Russia would have declared war against Germany as in WWI. Russia knows when North America's raw material security guarantees are decoupled from mainland Europe, it will enable Russia to win any war of attrition against Germany! Germany used NATO with North America's raw material security guarantees to further its own interest when it failed in WW1's goals. NATO was used to check Russia and avoid the WW1 trigger.
    8
  8. 7
  9. 6
  10. 5
  11. 5
  12. 5
  13. 4
  14. 4
  15. 4
  16. 4
  17. 4
  18. 4
  19. 4
  20. 4
  21. 4
  22. 4
  23.  @driesherreman6894  U.S. interventions in the Middle East area started from First Barbary War https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War Conflict: U.S.A vs Islamic Ottoman Empire. U.S. is joined by the Kingdom of Sicily and Kingdom of Sweden Goals: Stopping Ottoman's slavery on US trade. Both Kingdom of Sicily and the Kingdom of Sweden have pre-existing conflicts against the Ottoman Empire's slaving Europeans. -------------- In March 1786, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams went to London to negotiate with Tripoli's envoy, ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman (or Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja). When they enquired "concerning the ground of the pretensions to make war upon nations who had done them no injury", the ambassador replied: It was written in their Koran, (that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise). He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck of an enemy's ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into the foe that they cried out for quarter at once.[25] -------------- This is an existing "old world" issue. The 1st Barbary War leads to the U.S creating the Department of Navy, anti-slavery direction, and infamous freedom of navigation foreign policy.
    4
  24. 4
  25. @Mr. Mohammed Designer — المصمم محمد الكثيري Your "It’s the western countries like France that doing the problems and wars in Muslim countries" is bullsshit http://www.businessinsider.com/bnd-report-on-saudi-arabias-power-struggle-2015-12 Germany's intelligence agency says Saudi Arabia's 'game of thrones' risks tearing the Middle East apart. From https://www.reuters.com/article/us-opec-meeting-shale/inside-opec-room-naimi-declares-price-war-on-u-s-shale-oil-idUSKCN0JC1GK20141128 Saudi Arabia declares war on US shale oil. What do we have here? Another attempt to make US being Saudi Arabia's armed proxy . fvckoff http://www.businessinsider.com/turkey-and-saudi-arabia-collaborating-in-syria-2015-5?IR=T Sunni dominated Turkey and Saudi Arabia are officially collaborating to bring down Assad in Syria https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2014/12/12/why-turkeys-president-wants-to-revive-the-language-of-the-ottoman-empire/ *Turkey wants to revive the Ottoman Empire*, hence they have their goals and objectives. https://www.rt.com/usa/326748-us-syria-intelligence-hersh/ US military provided Assad with intel on extremists via Russia, Israel & Germany The Turkish government has refused to halt the flow of foreign jihadists going through Turkey because President Erdogan “is dreaming big – of restoring the Ottoman Empire – and he did not realize the extent to which he could be successful in this.” When rival German/American/Australian western news media vs Russian news media has similar conclusions that a certain Middle East country or countries playing 'game of thrones', then there's a problem. Try again.
    4
  26. 4
  27. 3
  28.  @jasonm949  >How many countries has the US invaded vs Germany? >Afghanistan Osama Bin Laden's group executed multiple strikes inside the US. >Libya NATO STOPPED the bloody civil war in Libya. Putin STARTED the bloody war in Ukraine. On 16 August 2003, Libya formally admitted responsibility for Pan Am Flight 103 (Lockabie bombing) in a letter presented to the president of the United Nations Security Council. "On 10 March 2011, France was the first country in the world to recognise the National Transitional Council as the legitimate government of Libya". United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 was adopted by the United Nations Security Council on 17 March 2011 in response to the First Libyan Civil War. The Security Council resolution was proposed by France, Lebanon, and the United Kingdom. The US supported France's, Lebanon's, and the United Kingdom's United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973. Muammar Gaddafi played stupid games and win stupid prizes. >Iraq Iraq invaded Kuwait. Iraq STARTED the bloody war in Kuwait. Iraq's top oil exports countries from Jan to Jun 2020 1st, China! 29 million tonnes <---- LOL 2nd, India, 23 million tonnes 3rd, EU, 8 million tonnes 4th, South Korea, 6 million tonnes 5th, Turkey, 4 million tonnes with an upwards trend 5th, USA, 4 million tonnes with a downwards trend Report: Saudi Arabia Presses U.S. on Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Date: January 19, 1992 <---- note the 1992 year. From AP NEWS NEW YORK (AP) _ Saudi Arabia is pressuring the Bush administration to secretly arm and give intelligence to Iraqi opposition forces so they can work to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a newspaper reported Sunday. The Saudis want the United States to give arms and intelligence to Kurdish rebels in north Iraq, Shiite Muslim fighters in the south and Sunni Muslim opposition forces in central Iraq, the Times said, quoting U.S. and allied officials it didn’t name.
    3
  29. 3
  30. 3
  31. 3
  32. 3
  33. 3
  34. 3
  35. 3
  36.  @matejtanko5117  Non-NATO Finland has Israeli design strike weapons with a 400 km range. Finland has PTSD against Russia. Perhaps Finland should buy Israel's Popeye Turbo SLCM with a 1500 km range. As long Russia sells missile tech to Israel's opponents, Israel will keep selling its missile tech to Eastern European countries. Unlike in 1956, Israel is a nuclear-armed state. Note the existence of independent nuclear weapons from US allies such as the UK, France, and Israel. The trigger is the 1956 Suez Canal crisis when the Soviets have threaten to nuke Britain, France, and Israel without US nuclear weapons coverage. Russian-dominated USSR's threaten to nuke non-nuclear states and the withdrawal of US nuclear weapons coverage have made the argument for independent nuclear weapons armed US allies! The Falklands War reveals the US will NOT defend UK's territorial integrity. The US will only defend its own and common interest with Saudi and Kuwaiti oil. France and UK also have a common interest in Saudi and Kuwaiti oil. Report: Saudi Arabia Presses U.S. on Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Date: January 19, 1992 From AP NEWS NEW YORK (AP) _ Saudi Arabia is pressuring the Bush administration to secretly arm and give intelligence to Iraqi opposition forces so they can work to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a newspaper reported Sunday. The Saudis want the United States to give arms and intelligence to Kurdish rebels in north Iraq, Shiite Muslim fighters in the south and Sunni Muslim opposition forces in central Iraq, the Times said, quoting U.S. and allied officials it didn’t name.
    3
  37. 3
  38. 3
  39. 3
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45.  @qinby1182  My "Australia doesn't exploit its mineral wealth like China's raw materials to the manufacturing chain" context based on the following news articles From WSJ Date: Aug. 15, 2010 Title: After securing Rare-Earth monopoly, China Dangles Rare-Earth Resources to Lure Investment BEIJING—China is cautiously using rare-earth resources as bait for foreign investment that could bring in sophisticated technologies that it needs. Industry and government officials have begun talking about a Chinese government plan to offer access to its rare-earth resources—which are used in products such as hybrid-car batteries and missiles and are under strict export restrictions—to get companies including electronics manufacturers and auto makers to set up rare-earth-processing plants in China. ---- My comment: China has a government policy that enforces manufacturing located in China when using China's rare earth. Setting up the leverage to use China's rare earth . From Graphite Publications article from 2010. Title: Will chinas Outrageous Rare Earth Monopoly Persist Year Date: 2010. Heavy importers of these REEs such as the U.S., Germany, and Japan believe these rationales disguise China’s true exploitative motive: to force foreign factories to move to China to keep their costs low and their supply high Second, importing countries have been concerned with the agglutination of Chinese mining companies in what appears to be a calculated move to make China’s monopoly even more monopolistic. Most prominently, Bao Gang Rare Earth (BGRE), a state-owned REE company forcibly merged with four smaller companies and numerous smaller companies were shut down to create a monopoly in Northern China which accounts for two-thirds of China’s output. Moreover, China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) decreed minimum production thresholds for domestic companies in early August 2012, essentially truncating the smallest REE producers as well as with 20% of China’s rare earths capacity. ---- Your argument and mindset are simplistic, NOT holistic. You're stupid while China is smart. Australia's increase in rare earth exports is relatively recent and backed by the Australian government's $2 billion state loan facility (Sep 2021) for Australian critical minerals projects.
    2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2
  51. 2
  52. 2
  53. 2
  54. 2
  55. 2
  56. 2
  57. 2
  58. 2
  59. 2
  60. 2
  61. 2
  62. 2
  63.  @lordmike9384  The difference, the US has LNG interest in Poland and US is NOT resource poor UK, France and Germany. ------- The United States remained Europe’s top supplier of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the first 3 months of 2021 as it continued to gain market share at the expense of Russia and Qatar, Europe’s second- and third-largest sources of LNG, according to the EU Commission’s latest European Gas Market Report. The US supplied 24% (4.2 Bcm) of the EU’s overall LNG imports (17 Bcm in Q1 2021); Russia placed second at 21% (3.7 Bcm); and Qatar was third at 18% (3.1 Bcm), the EU Commission reported in early July. When compared to Q4 2020, the US picked up 2% market share from January to March this year, while Russia bested Qatar to become Europe’s second-largest LNG supplier. Nigeria placed fourth, followed by Algeria and Trinidad and Tobago. A review of EU Commission reports dating back to 2019 reveals a steady quarter-to-quarter decline in Europe’s LNG purchases while it also documents the growing rivalry between the US and Russia, Qatar’s fall from dominance, and the emergence of the US as Europe’s top LNG supplier starting Q4 2019. The EU is the world’s third-largest LNG market, though its imports amounted to only about half that of Japan (36 Bcm) and China (32 Bcm) in Q1 2021. European gas consumption rose 7.6% to 132 Bcm in Q1 based on a year-on-year comparison. The commission noted that demand for gas as fuel to generate electricity rose 3.4%, also year-on-year (increasing by 4.9 TWh.) --------- You can't handle it when Russia is not the only energy superpower with interest.
    2
  64. 2
  65. 2
  66. 2
  67. 2
  68.  @lordmike9384  > omg you're contradicting yourself. uk definitely had the power to attack germany with airpower and didn't. FALSE, Approximate distance UK's London to Germany's Dusseldorf = 479 km one-way direction Approximate distance UK's London to Germany's Frankfurt = 613 km one-way direction Supermarine Spitfire's range with external tank = 1826.605 km or 913 km combat radius. Hawker Hurricane's range = 970 km or 485 km combat radius (defensive fighter, the backbone of RAF). F-16s has a similar short legs issue as Hawker Hurricane's. F-16 is designed as defensive fighter aircraft. Supermarine Spitfire has the range endurance to cover British/French armies over Belgium and most of France, but they are few in numbers when compared to Hawker Hurricanes. For the bomber escort missions, most of RAF's fighter fleet with Hawker Hurricanes does NOT have long-range escort bomber capability! Prior to P-51 Mustang, RAF bomber escort via Spitfires can cover most of France and into Germany's northwest areas around Cologne and Bonn. The statement "uk definitely had the power to attack germany with airpower and didn't." is FALSE since most of RAF's fleet is made up of air defense fighter Hawker Hurricanes. LOL January 1942 (for RAF) US's P-51D Mustang's range with external tanks = 2,660 km or 1,330 km combat radius. F-35A has a 1407 km combat radius (Israeli info) with just internal fuel tanks. The P-51 Mustang was a solution to the need for an effective bomber escort. P-51 fighters can escort bombers anywhere Germany! and into Poland's Warsaw.
    2
  69. 2
  70. 2
  71. 2
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81.  @jasonm949  Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country".[8] You're a hypocrite.
    1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92.  @AlexandruAlic  The Chile example, Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". --------------- In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical. USSR's proxy attempted to remove Chile's check-and-balance Congress system. USSR's proxy attempted to concentrate political power into a single entity (individual and political party).
    1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103.  @baronvonlimbourgh1716  >Most european countries don't want to get entangled in the usa's crusade. That's a false narrative. 1. 1863–1864 January uprising, Russian Empire crushed Polish, Lithuanian, and Ukrainian insurgents uprising. 2. Soviet–Ukrainian War occurred between 1917 to 1921, a war between the Ukrainian People's Republic vs the Bolsheviks i.e. Ukrainian Soviet Republic and Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (modern-day Russian Federation). These "old world" issues have existed before the US being a superpower. Before Euromaidan, Russia successfully used political and economic leverage to dissuade Ukraine from signing the E.U. deal. In the months prior to the Vilnius summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a trade war with Kyiv, blocking nearly all imports from Ukraine and cutting energy supplies to the country. In turn, this reduced Ukrainian exports by 25 percent and shrank the economy by 1.5 percent. Ukraine Constitution 1991, Article 17, disallows foreign military bases after 2017. According to former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, Ukraine's constitution forbids the country from hosting foreign military bases after 2017. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1991, Article 17. After 2017, Ukraine's constitution is incompatible with foreign military bases hosting either NATO or CSTO. In 2018, President Petro Poroshenko's constitution amendment allowed temporary foreign military bases. 🤣😂😅 If Yanukovych didn't sign the military base rental extension, Russia would be kicked out of Crimea. You believed Putin's false narrative!
    1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115.  @williamzk9083  1. FACTS: When the German Empire invaded Belgium in August 1914 in violation of the "Treaty of London of 1839", the British declared war on 4 August. Imperialist Germany invaded Belgium. The counterclaim should be blaming Austria-Hungary when Germany is stuck with its defense treaty with Austria-Hungary. The Marshall Plan (ultimately replaced by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) is the US's post-war method to repair West Germany instead of the French-British's harsh Treaty of Versailles which created an unstable social-economic situation in Germany. OECD factors in the social-economic situation for each of its member countries. Russia has been suspended from OECD. 2. FACTS: Your "Anglo British Naval Treaty of 1904" doesn't exist. Entente Cordiale was signed on April 8, 1904 and the agreement in no sense created an alliance and did not entangle Great Britain with a French commitment to Russia (1894). Entente Cordiale prepares the UK and French cooperation, by solving the issues between the two countries. 3. FACTS: There was "Anglo-French naval agreement of 19I2". "Anglo-French naval agreement of 19I2" would essentially give the French navy responsibility for guarding the Mediterranean, allowing Britain to concentrate its naval power in the North Sea against Germany. The UK has its own sovereign rights for war preparation just like Germany's war preparation. Anything less is hypocritical on your part. 4. Reminder, read the "Treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany" that limits modern Germany's troop numbers to 370,000. "Treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany" includes respect for Poland's territorial integrity just like Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum. Unlike Ukraine, Poland is a NATO member with Article V that commits the US/UK nuclear weapons usage in defense of NATO. France does not participate in NATO's nuclear planning mechanisms and its nuclear forces are not formally assigned to NATO. France may call upon its nuclear arsenal if there are threats to its neighbors or allies.
    1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134.  @Apache1970  CPC is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about the West's reciprocal protectionist advocacy e.g. Foreign entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  135. 1
  136.  @Apache1970  From Forbes, Title: Protectionism May Be Rising Around The World, But In China, It Never Went Away Year Date: 2016 Promises unkept? Since joining the WTO in 2001, China has repeatedly insisted that it will live up to those undertakings made on entry. In particular, the use of currency manipulation has been identified by the US as a breech of the commitment to end price controls for the purposes of protecting domestic industries. This became a major political issue from 2005 onwards, and has only recently subsided because it is assumed that the RMB is slightly overvalued on the market. Nevertheless, for years it was deliberate policy for the PBoC to accumulate US Dollars and suppress the exchange rate for the RMB, resulting in exactly the price distortions China had committed to eliminate in 2001, and fuelling an enormous trade surplus with the US, which persists and expands to this day. Furthermore TRIPS implementation has been given some effect on paper, but has made little progress when it comes to 'enforcement.' This is (according to the WTO) as recently as February 2015, fully 14 years after TRIPS was supposed to be already in effect. The US Trade Representative produces an annual report to Congress on China's WTO compliance which leaves little room to conclude they have so far lived up to their accession commitments. The most recent several-hundred-page document - produced in December 2015 - recites a long list of small measures, committees established, announcements made and new administrative complications faced, all continuing disputes over an agreement theoretically in effect since 2001. Although, therefore, protectionism is rising around the world, it is also true to say that existing practices of protectionism have not fallen in the way that they should have since China's accession to the WTO in 2001. Because of this lack of progress in easing trade, the extended period of currency manipulation, the lack of observance of TRIPS and the sheer administrative resistance exporters face when trying to get their products into China, we now face of world of highly unbalanced trade, and rising mistrust. And it is this that is leading to rising protectionism; the simple fact that it never went away.
    1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. The Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical.
    1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1