Youtube comments of Valen Ron (@valenrn8657).

  1. 309
  2. 249
  3. 246
  4. 215
  5. 212
  6. 173
  7. 170
  8. 164
  9. 162
  10. 123
  11. 116
  12. 113
  13. 113
  14. 111
  15. 110
  16. 109
  17. 101
  18. 98
  19. 98
  20. 97
  21. 97
  22. 95
  23. 95
  24. 88
  25. 84
  26. 1. France has backed Italy’s decision to block COVID-19 vaccine exports to Australia. France has shown its bias for Italy ahead of Australia. 2. A French lawmaker raised questions in the country’s parliament in June about Australian concerns over delays, and whether Australia might be considering submarine alternatives, French government records show. Proving the French were aware of the cost overruns and the failure to complete the design on time had created issues with the Australians. After Australia had spent 2.5 billion dollars for no tangible results. The French asked for an extension nearly two years ago which would extend the design completion date from July 2022 to September 2023. Cost overruns, failure to deliver contractual obligations on time, hostility from the French whenever Australia tried to work out these issues with the French. 2.5 billion dollars and no finished design after five years. That is a cost overrun and all the French lies and tantrums don't change the facts. France failed to honour the contract with Australia. Macron is a lying brat, he should explain why the French have failed to deliver when all they were doing is modifying an existing design from nuclear propulsion to diesel-electric propulsion. After five years and 2.5 billion dollars they did not even finish the design let alone start building the first sub in France as specified by the contract, nor did they start building a shipyard in Adelaide as specified by the contract. Why Australian media is spinning this issue with the French as Australia's fault when the evidence is there for all to see says everything about the Australian media. Whether you love him or hate him, Morrison pull the plug on a scam, a scam that cost Australia 2.5 billion dollars and was only going to get worse, for a submarine that belongs back in the 20th century and does not meet Australia's defence needs in the 21st Century.
    83
  27. 82
  28. 81
  29. 77
  30. 75
  31. 68
  32. 68
  33. 68
  34. 64
  35. 63
  36. 61
  37. 61
  38. 60
  39. 59
  40. 58
  41. 57
  42. 57
  43. 56
  44. 53
  45. 52
  46. 50
  47. 50
  48. 50
  49. 50
  50. 49
  51. 48
  52. 47
  53. 47
  54. 47
  55. 46
  56. 45
  57. 45
  58. 44
  59. 44
  60. 44
  61. 43
  62. 43
  63. 43
  64. 42
  65. 41
  66. 41
  67. 38
  68. 37
  69. 37
  70. 37
  71. 36
  72. 34
  73. 34
  74. 33
  75. 33
  76. 33
  77. 32
  78. 32
  79. 31
  80. 31
  81. 31
  82. 31
  83. 30
  84. 30
  85. 29
  86. 29
  87. 29
  88. 29
  89. 29
  90. 29
  91. 28
  92. From http://www.warisboring.com/2009/02/10/russian-super-fighter-not-so-scary/ Pierre Sprey comments on Flankers 1. The Su-30MK is simply another modification of the Su-27, a not-very-high-performing Russian imitation of our F-15 that had its prototype flight in 1977. The new version is significantly heavier and has poorer dogfight acceleration and turn than the original, mainly because of all the weighty and draggy gadgetry (e.g., canards, vectored thrust nozzles) added to allow these spectacular maneuvers. 2. The spectacular maneuvers … are purely and simply airshow tricks, intended to wow the gullible. Not one of these maneuvers has any application to combat, because they can only be performed at speeds well under 150 knots. At that speed in a dogfight against any competent pilot, your life expectancy is measured in seconds. 3. My guess is that there are no more than six pilots in all of Russia that can actually fly these maneuvers — and that they have been in training for years in order to trot out these tricks at international airshows. 4. Executing these wonderful tricks at the Paris airshow with these Olympic-athlete type of pilots, the Russians have crashed two of the Su-30 “Wunderwaffen,” one in 1999 and one in 2006. 5. The Russians have, in fact, palmed off versions of the Wunderwaffen to the Chinese, as well as to the Indians, Malaysians, Algerians, and the dreaded Venezuelans. Despite these triumphs of Russian salesmanship. I’m not losing much sleep over the specter of the awesome Su-30 in the hands of these superb air forces. The more of these turkeys the Russkies sell, the longer the now-ancient F-16 (designed in 1972) will reign supreme as the world’s best fighter. The same person who labeled F-35 being a turkey also labeled SU-30MK a turkey. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4DWX-R8ME8&index=4&list=PLG8j-n4MjuQAg6jQHX2dVOFYWuaqr5NKD F-35AvsF-22vsEF-2000 TURN
    28
  93. 28
  94. 28
  95. A French lawmaker raised questions in the country’s parliament in June about Australian concerns over delays, and whether Australia might be considering submarine alternatives, French government records show. Proving the French were aware of the cost overruns and the failure to complete the design on time had created issues with the Australians. After Australia had spent 2.5 billion dollars for no tangible results. The French asked for an extension nearly two years ago which would extend the design completion date from July 2022 to September 2023. Cost overruns, failure to deliver contractual obligations on time, hostility from the French whenever Australia tried to work out these issues with the French. 2.5 billion dollars and no finished design after five years. That is a cost overrun and all the French lies and tantrums don't change the facts. France failed to honour the contract with Australia. Macron is a lying brat, he should explain why the French have failed to deliver when all they were doing is modifying an existing design from nuclear propulsion to diesel-electric propulsion. After five years and 2.5 billion dollars they did not even finish the design let alone start building the first sub in France as specified by the contract, nor did they start building a shipyard in Adelaide as specified by the contract. Why Australian media is spinning this issue with the French as Australia's fault when the evidence is there for all to see says everything about the Australian media. Whether you love him or hate him, Morrison pull the plug on a scam, a scam that cost Australia 2.5 billion dollars and was only going to get worse, for a submarine that belongs back in the 20th century and does not meet Australia's defence needs in the 21st Century. ----- The Australian’s Editor at Large Paul Kelly is wrong.
    27
  96. 27
  97. 27
  98. 26
  99. 26
  100. 26
  101. 26
  102. 26
  103. 25
  104. 25
  105. 25
  106. 25
  107. 24
  108. 24
  109. 24
  110. 24
  111. 24
  112. 24
  113. 23
  114. 23
  115. 23
  116. 23
  117. 23
  118. 23
  119. 23
  120. 23
  121. 23
  122. 23
  123. 23
  124. 22
  125. 22
  126. 22
  127. 22
  128. 22
  129. 21
  130. 21
  131. 21
  132. 21
  133. 21
  134. 21
  135. 21
  136. 21
  137. 20
  138. 20
  139. 20
  140. 20
  141. 20
  142. 20
  143. 20
  144. 20
  145. 20
  146. 20
  147. 19
  148. 19
  149. 19
  150. 19
  151. 19
  152. 19
  153. 19
  154. 19
  155. 18
  156. 18
  157. 18
  158. 18
  159. 18
  160. 18
  161. 18
  162. 18
  163. 18
  164. 18
  165. 17
  166. 17
  167. 17
  168. 17
  169. 17
  170. 17
  171. 17
  172. 17
  173. 17
  174. 16
  175. 16
  176. 16
  177. 16
  178. 16
  179. 16
  180. 16
  181. 16
  182. 16
  183. 16
  184. 16
  185. 16
  186. 16
  187. 15
  188. 15
  189. 15
  190. 15
  191. 15
  192. 15
  193. 15
  194. 15
  195. 15
  196. 15
  197. 15
  198. 15
  199. 15
  200. 14
  201. 14
  202. 14
  203. 14
  204. 14
  205. 14
  206. 14
  207. 14
  208. 14
  209. 14
  210. 14
  211. 14
  212. 14
  213. 14
  214. 14
  215. 14
  216. 14
  217. 14
  218. 14
  219. 14
  220. 14
  221. >Afghanistan Osama Bin Laden's group in Afghanistan has executed strikes inside the US. >Libya NATO STOPPED the bloody civil war in Libya. Putin STARTED the bloody war in Ukraine. On 16 August 2003, Libya formally admitted responsibility for Pan Am Flight 103 (Lockabie bombing) in a letter presented to the president of the United Nations Security Council. "On 10 March 2011, France was the first country in the world to recognise the National Transitional Council as the legitimate government of Libya". United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 was adopted by the United Nations Security Council on 17 March 2011 in response to the First Libyan Civil War. The Security Council resolution was proposed by France, Lebanon, and the United Kingdom. Muammar Gaddafi played stupid games and win stupid prizes. The US supported the France(EU)'s and UK(EU)'s, and Lebanon's United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973. NATO wasn't used until United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 since it was vetoed by Turkey. If, however, you are referring to the NATO intervention in Libya, that was NATO agreeing to enforce a United Nations Security Council Resolution. It was never intended as a permanent expansion of the Alliance to embrace Libya nor to establish a NATO base in the country. >Iraq Iraq invaded Kuwait. Iraq STARTED the bloody war in Kuwait. Iraq's top oil exports countries from Jan to Jun 2020 1st, China! 29 million tonnes <---- LOL 2nd, India, 23 million tonnes 3rd, EU, 8 million tonnes 4th, South Korea, 6 million tonnes 5th, Turkey, 4 million tonnes with an upwards trend 5th, USA, 4 million tonnes with a downwards trend Report: Saudi Arabia Presses U.S. on Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Date: January 19, 1992 <----- note the 1992 year From AP NEWS NEW YORK (AP) _ Saudi Arabia is pressuring the Bush administration to secretly arm and give intelligence to Iraqi opposition forces so they can work to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a newspaper reported Sunday. The Saudis want the United States to give arms and intelligence to Kurdish rebels in north Iraq, Shiite Muslim fighters in the south and Sunni Muslim opposition forces in central Iraq, the Times said, quoting U.S. and allied officials it didn’t name.
    13
  222. 13
  223. 13
  224. 13
  225. 13
  226. 13
  227. 13
  228. 13
  229. 13
  230. 13
  231. 13
  232. 13
  233. 13
  234. 13
  235. 13
  236. 13
  237. 13
  238. 13
  239. 12
  240. 12
  241. 12
  242. 12
  243. 12
  244. 12
  245. 12
  246. 12
  247. 12
  248. 12
  249. 12
  250. 12
  251. 12
  252. 12
  253. 12
  254. 12
  255. 12
  256. 12
  257. 12
  258. 12
  259. 12
  260. 12
  261. 12
  262. 12
  263. 12
  264. 11
  265. 11
  266. 11
  267.  @Pats4lyfe  1. Greece is an EU member. 2. There's a gas pipeline from Israel to Greek Cypriot (EU) to Greece (EU) https://www.european-views.com/2019/03/us-throws-weight-behind-greece-cyprus-israel-for-eastmed-natural-gas-pipeline/ US supports gas pipeline from Israel to Greek Cypriot (EU) to Greece (EU). When there's hydrocarbon issues, US and EU will be active. 3. Greece has F-16V Block 70/71 while Turkey has older F-16C Block 52+ 4. Greece has an allance with Israel, hence F-35I would come into this picture. 5. There's Australian interest with Israeli gas i.e. Australia's largest natural gas and oil company, Woodside Petroleum. https://www.timesofisrael.com/top-australian-company-buys-into-israeli-natural-gas/ Australia has a squadron of F-35A Block 3F, 24 F/A-18F Block 2 Super Hornets, 11 EA-18 and 71 F/A-18A MLU (similar to F-16C Block 52+). 6. There's US interest with Cyprus gas i.e. ExxonMobile https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/28/exxonmobil-makes-big-natural-gas-discovery-off-the-coast-of-cyprus.html It's not advisable to get in the way US/EU gas interest. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/summary/glossary/mutual_defence.html The Treaty of Lisbon strengthens the solidarity between EU countries in dealing with external threats by introducing a mutual defence clause (Article 42(7) of the Treaty on European Union). This clause provides that if an EU country is the victim of armed aggression on its territory, the other EU countries have an obligation to aid and assist it by all the means in their power, in accordance with Article 51 of the United Nations Charter. Article 43(1) The tasks referred to in Article 42(1), in the course of which the Union may use civilian and military means, shall include joint disarmament operations, humanitarian and rescue tasks, military advice and assistance tasks, conflict prevention and peace-keeping tasks, tasks of combat forces in crisis management, including peace-making and post-conflict stabilisation. All these tasks may contribute to the fight against terrorism, including by supporting third countries in combating terrorism in their territories The Treaty of Lisbon lays the ground work for European Army. EU is more poltical union since it has judicial and monetary union, hence it's proto-United States of Europe. NATO agreement does not apply when there's conflicts between NATO members, hence EU's Article 42(7) would be used. EU supported Australia's geopolitics in Antarctica against Russia/China US supported New Zealand's geopolitics in Antarctica against Russia/China The gas pipeline from Israel, Greek Cypriot and Greece are attracting US, EU and Australia.
    11
  268. 11
  269. 11
  270.  @raymondutter2616  For Crimea, Before Crimean Khanate, it was the Crimean Goth which is Germanic. The Ostrogoths had a huge kingdom north of the Black Sea in the 4th century, which the Huns overwhelmed in the time of the Gothic king Ermanaric. The Ostrogoths became vassals of the Huns until the death of Attila when they revolted and regained independence. The Crimean Goths had converted from Arian to Chalcedonian Christianity by the 6th century. The Principality of Theodoro continued until 1475 when it was finally incorporated in the Khanate of Crimea and the Ottoman Empire. This is generally considered to be the fall of the Crimean Goths and their eventual extinction. Crimean Gothic was an East Germanic language spoken by the Crimean Goths. The territory of Crimea was controlled by the Crimean Khanate and was annexed by the Russian Empire on 19 April 1783. Crimea was incorporated into the Empire as the Taurida Oblast. Later that year, the Ottoman Empire signed an agreement with Russia that recognised the loss of Crimea and other territories that had been held by the Khanate. The agreement, signed on 28 December 1783, was negotiated by Russian diplomat Yakov Bulgakov. The formal treaty of transfer has been referred to as The Treaty of Constantinople (1784). By the late 19th century, Crimean Tatars continued to form a slight plurality of Crimea's still largely rural population. Crimean People's Republic = December 1917 – January 1918, Crimean Tatar government Taurida Soviet Socialist Republic = 19 March – 30 April 1918, Bolshevik government Ukrainian People's Republic = May–June 1918 First Crimean Regional Government = 25 June – 25 November 1918, German puppet state under Lipka Tatar General Maciej (Suleyman) Sulkiewicz Second Crimean Regional Government = November 1918 – April 1919, Anti-Bolshevik government under Crimean Karaite former Kadet member Solomon Krym Crimean Socialist Soviet Republic = 2 April – June 1919, Bolshevik government South Russian Government = February 1920 – April 1920 Government of South Russia = 16 August – 16 November 1920 Bolshevik Revolutionary Committee government = November 1920 – 18 October 1921. Almost immediately after retaking of Crimea from Axis forces, in May 1944, the USSR State Defense Committee ordered the deportation of all of the Crimean Tatars from Crimea. The deportees were transported in trains and boxcars to Central Asia, primarily to Uzbekistan. The Crimean Tatars lost 18 to 46 percent of their population as a result of the deportations.
    11
  271. 11
  272. 11
  273.  @antoniomromo  That's a false equivalence. Unlike Russia, the US did NOT assimilate Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, and Yugoslavia into US federal structure. >Yugoslavia 9 February 1994: At UN request, NATO agreed to authorise air strikes, declared 20 km total exclusion zone around Sarajevo and required Bosnian Serbs to withdraw heavy weapons from zone or place them under UN control within 10 days; also called on Bosnian Government to place heavy weapons in Sarajevo under UN control. Agreement between 'RS' and Bosnian Government to a ceasefire in Sarajevo, negotiated by Lieutenant-General Sir Michael Rose, then Commander of UN forces in Bosnia. UN Security Council through UNSCR 836 of 4 June 1994 authorizes the use of air power to defend the safe areas created by UN Security Council resolution 824 of 6 May 1993. >Libya NATO STOPPED the bloody civil war in Libya. Putin STARTED the bloody war in Ukraine. On 16 August 2003, Libya formally admitted responsibility for Pan Am Flight 103 (Lockabie bombing) in a letter presented to the president of the United Nations Security Council. "On 10 March 2011, France was the first country in the world to recognise the National Transitional Council as the legitimate government of Libya". United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 was adopted by the United Nations Security Council on 17 March 2011 in response to the First Libyan Civil War. The Security Council resolution was proposed by France, Lebanon, and the United Kingdom. Muammar Gaddafi played stupid games and win stupid prizes. The US supported France(EU)'s and UK(EU)'s, and Lebanon's United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973. NATO wasn't used until United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 since it was vetoed by Turkey. >Iraq Facts: Iraq started the hot war against Kuwait. Iraq attempted to annex Kuwait. If a country attempted to annex another country, the invading country that attempted to enlarge its territory (expansionist nationalism) should be prepared to be annexed by another country. Don't cry to me about moral superiority when Iraq doesn't have this position in the first place! If you can't handle the heat, don't start a hot war in the 1st place.
    11
  274. 11
  275. 11
  276. 11
  277. 11
  278. 11
  279. 11
  280. 11
  281. 11
  282. Foreigners can not buy land in China. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited. --------------- China's protectionism is far higher than Australia's.
    11
  283. 11
  284. 11
  285. 11
  286. 11
  287. 11
  288. 11
  289. 11
  290. 11
  291. 11
  292. 11
  293. 10
  294. 10
  295. 10
  296. 10
  297. 10
  298. 10
  299. 10
  300. 10
  301. 10
  302. 10
  303. 10
  304.  @keepingcalm6469  US has its own interest. The United States remained Europe’s top supplier of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the first 3 months of 2021 as it continued to gain market share at the expense of Russia and Qatar, Europe’s second- and third-largest sources of LNG, according to the EU Commission’s latest European Gas Market Report. The US supplied 24% (4.2 Bcm) of the EU’s overall LNG imports (17 Bcm in Q1 2021); Russia placed second at 21% (3.7 Bcm); and Qatar was third at 18% (3.1 Bcm), the EU Commission reported in early July. When compared to Q4 2020, the US picked up 2% market share from January to March this year, while Russia bested Qatar to become Europe’s second-largest LNG supplier. Nigeria placed fourth, followed by Algeria and Trinidad and Tobago. A review of EU Commission reports dating back to 2019 reveals a steady quarter-to-quarter decline in Europe’s LNG purchases while it also documents the growing rivalry between the US and Russia, Qatar’s fall from dominance, and the emergence of the US as Europe’s top LNG supplier starting Q4 2019. The EU is the world’s third-largest LNG market, though its imports amounted to only about half that of Japan (36 Bcm) and China (32 Bcm) in Q1 2021. European gas consumption rose 7.6% to 132 Bcm in Q1 based on a year-on-year comparison. The commission noted that demand for gas as fuel to generate electricity rose 3.4%, also year-on-year (increasing by 4.9 TWh.) In terms of gas deliveries overall, including pipeline gas, Russia remained the leading gas supplier to Europe (45% of all imports) with the Nord Stream 1 pipeline across the Baltic Sea as its most important supply route.
    10
  305. 10
  306. 10
  307. 10
  308. 10
  309. 10
  310. 10
  311. 10
  312. 10
  313. 10
  314. 10
  315. 10
  316. 10
  317. 10
  318. 10
  319. 10
  320. 10
  321. 10
  322. 10
  323. 10
  324. 10
  325. 10
  326. 10
  327. 10
  328. 10
  329. 10
  330. 10
  331. 10
  332. 10
  333. 10
  334. 10
  335. 10
  336. 10
  337. 9
  338. 9
  339. 9
  340. 9
  341. 9
  342. 9
  343. 9
  344. 9
  345. 9
  346. 9
  347. 9
  348. 9
  349. 9
  350. 9
  351. 9
  352. 9
  353. 9
  354. 9
  355. 9
  356. 9
  357. 9
  358. 9
  359. 9
  360. 9
  361. 9
  362. 9
  363. 9
  364. 9
  365. 9
  366. 9
  367. 9
  368. 9
  369. 9
  370. 9
  371. 9
  372. 9
  373. 9
  374. 9
  375. 9
  376. 9
  377. 9
  378. 9
  379. 9
  380. 9
  381. 9
  382. 9
  383. 9
  384. 9
  385. 9
  386. 9
  387. 9
  388. 9
  389. 9
  390. 9
  391. 9
  392. 9
  393. 9
  394. 9
  395. 9
  396. 8
  397. 8
  398. 8
  399. 8
  400.  @dipthongthathongthongthong9691  Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country".[8] You're a hypocrite.
    8
  401. 8
  402. 8
  403. 8
  404. 8
  405. 8
  406. 8
  407. 8
  408. 8
  409. 8
  410. 8
  411. 8
  412. 8
  413. 8
  414. 8
  415. 8
  416. 8
  417. 8
  418. 8
  419. 8
  420. 8
  421. 8
  422. 8
  423. 8
  424. 8
  425. 8
  426. 8
  427. 8
  428. 8
  429. 8
  430. 8
  431.  @kl_guy6969  In the mid-2000s, Colombo (the commercial capital of Sri Lanka) agreed to let Beijing build a new port from scratch in the town of Hambantota, in the south of the island. It wasn’t yet thought of as part of a new Silk Road -- that programme was conceptualizsed by Xi Jinping in 2012 -- but all the ingredients were there. "Chinese funds and engineers are mobilised to build infrastructure outside China, as part of a partnership that was meant to be win-win: this is the very definition of the rationale of the Silk Road," said Jean-François Dufour, economist and director of DCA China-Analysis. The Chinese president integrated the Sri Lankan project into his Silk Road initiative in 2013. But in 2015, financial clouds began gathering over the future of Hambantota’s port, which cost $1.1 billion. Sri Lanka was crumbling under the debt, and was unable to repay the more than $8 billion in loans it had taken from China for several infrastructure projects in the country. Furious, Beijing turned up the heat and threatened to cut off financial support to the island nation if it didn’t quickly find a solution. In December, 2017, after two years of negotiations, Colombo finally agreed to turn over the port to China for 99 years in exchange for the cancellation of its debt. The concession was humiliating for Sri Lanka, while "the opponents of China, like India, painted the entire operation as a deliberate plan to acquire strategic positions in the region," Dufour said. China was suspected of intentionally strangling Colombo with loans at a 6 percent interest rate, which was much higher than the other lenders - such as the World Bank – from which Colombo had previously borrowed.
    8
  432. 8
  433.  @claudiopereira9900  Timeline of Yugoslav breakup 22 January 1990: Slovenian, Croatian and Macedonian delegates abandon the last Congress of the Communist League of Yugoslavia. The Communist Party of Yugoslavia is dissolved. 1 July 1990: The Parliament of Slovenia votes to declare independence (but independence is not proclaimed). 1 October 1990: George Bush, in a meeting with the Yugoslav president of the Presidency, gives full support to Yugoslavia. 21 February 1991: After receiving news of the Slovenian parliament's decision to start legal actions for independence and for the possible creation of new union of independent states, the Croatian parliament makes a similar decision. 25 September 1991: Macedonia declares independence. 8 October 1991: Croatia declares independence from Yugoslavia. 2 December 1991: President of Macedonia sends an official letter to the presidents of the foreign governments asking for recognition of the independence of Macedonia. Immediately after that Greece starts military provocations on the Macedonian-Greece border. 11 December 1991: Ukraine recognizes Croatia. ... 19 December 1991: Germany announces that it will recognize Croatia on January 15, 1992, with or without the rest of the European Community. 23 December 1991: Germany becomes the first major power to recognize Croatia and Slovenia as independent states 15 January 1992: The European Community recognizes Slovenia and Croatia. 21 February 1992: United Nations Security Council Resolution 743 sets up a Protection Force (UNPROFOR) mandated to create three IJN Protected Areas (UNPAs) in Croatia. ----- GERMANY has pushed NATO and the EU to smash Yugoslavia when Germany failed to smash Serbia in WW1 and WW2 goals. Your narrative is NOT based on facts! Your narrative is based on separating Germany from the US so that Russia can take on Germany, again. Without NATO, Germany would have done it alone and we would have another WW1 trigger i.e. Russia would have declared war against Germany as in WWI. Russia knows when North America's raw material security guarantees are decoupled from mainland Europe, it will enable Russia to win any war of attrition against Germany! Germany used NATO with North America's raw material security guarantees to further its own interest when it failed in WW1's goals. NATO was used to check Russia and avoid the WW1 trigger.
    8
  434. 8
  435. 8
  436. 8
  437. 8
  438. 8
  439. 8
  440. 8
  441. 8
  442. 8
  443. 8
  444. 8
  445. 8
  446. 8
  447. 8
  448. 8
  449. 8
  450. 8
  451. 8
  452. 8
  453. 8
  454. 8
  455. 8
  456. 8
  457. 8
  458. 7
  459. 7
  460. 7
  461. 7
  462. 7
  463. 7
  464. 7
  465. 7
  466. 7
  467. 7
  468. 7
  469. 7
  470. 7
  471. 7
  472. 7
  473. 7
  474. 7
  475. 7
  476. 7
  477. 7
  478. 7
  479. 7
  480. 7
  481. 7
  482. 7
  483. 7
  484. 7
  485. 7
  486. 7
  487. 7
  488. 7
  489. 7
  490. 7
  491. 7
  492. 7
  493. 7
  494. 7
  495. 7
  496. 7
  497. 7
  498. 7
  499. 7
  500.  @zharkoo  The Chile example, USSR supported its Cuban proxy which in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority-governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical. USSR's proxy attempted to remove Chile's check-and-balance Congress system. USSR's proxy attempted to concentrate political power into a single entity (individual and political party). The US has no problems with the Swedish-style nanny market led-socialism that is practiced in the CANZUK and Nordic groups. Look in the mirror.
    7
  501. 7
  502. 7
  503. 7
  504. 7
  505. 7
  506. 7
  507. 7
  508. 7
  509. 7
  510. 7
  511. 7
  512. 7
  513. 7
  514. 7
  515. 7
  516. 7
  517. 7
  518. 7
  519. 7
  520. 7
  521. 7
  522. 7
  523. 7
  524. 7
  525. 7
  526. 7
  527. 7
  528. 7
  529. 7
  530. 7
  531. 7
  532. 7
  533. 7
  534. 7
  535. 7
  536. 7
  537. 7
  538. 7
  539. 7
  540. 7
  541. 7
  542. 7
  543. 7
  544. 7
  545. 7
  546. 6
  547. 6
  548. 6
  549. 6
  550. 6
  551. 6
  552. 6
  553. 6
  554. 6
  555. 6
  556. 6
  557. 6
  558. 6
  559. 6
  560. 6
  561. 6
  562. 6
  563. 6
  564. 6
  565.  @ghostdog4330  Myth 1: NATO promised Russia it would not expand after the Cold War Fact: Such an agreement was never made. NATO’s door has been open to new members since it was founded in 1949 – and that has never changed. This “Open Door Policy” is enshrined in Article 10 of NATO’s founding treaty, which says “any other European State in a position to further the principles of this Treaty and to contribute to the security of the North Atlantic” can apply for membership. Decisions on membership are taken by consensus among all Allies. No treaty signed by the United States, Europe and Russia included provisions on NATO membership. The idea of NATO expansion beyond a united Germany was not on the agenda in 1989, particularly as the Warsaw Pact still existed. This was confirmed by Mikhail Gorbachev in an interview in 2014: "The topic of 'NATO expansion' was not discussed at all, and it wasn't brought up in those years. I say this with full responsibility. Not a single Eastern European country raised the issue, not even after the Warsaw Pact ceased to exist in 1991. Western leaders didn't bring it up, either." Declassified White House transcripts also reveal that, in 1997, Bill Clinton consistently refused Boris Yeltsin's offer of a 'gentlemen's agreement' that no former Soviet Republics would enter NATO: "I can't make commitments on behalf of NATO, and I'm not going to be in the position myself of vetoing NATO expansion with respect to any country, much less letting you or anyone else do so…NATO operates by consensus."
    6
  566. 6
  567. 6
  568. 6
  569. 6
  570. 6
  571. 6
  572. 6
  573. 6
  574. 6
  575. 6
  576. 6
  577. 6
  578.  @raymondutter2616  Hint: Eurovision is dominated by the English (Latin-Norman French-Germanic blending) language. It's only a matter of time for the older generation dies off before the United States of Europe can be created i.e. federalized European Union. The US will undo Roman Empire (Italy)'s Romance and Germanic language divide. ---- Norway has +90% English speaking. The Netherlands has 90% English speaking. Sweden has 89% English speaking. Denmark has 86% English speaking. Finland has 70% English speaking. Germany has 56% English speaking and it's mostly in the younger generation. Belgium has 55% English speaking and it's mostly in the younger generation. Ukraine has 50% English speaking while Russian speaking is around 46%. LOL Poland has 49% English speaking and it's mostly in the younger generation. Austria has 40% English speaking and it's mostly in the younger generation. France has 39% English speaking and it's mostly in the younger generation. Franks were Germanic tribes that were influenced by Latin Roman Empire. Italy has 13% English speaking and it's mostly in the younger generation. It's relatively easy for Germanic-speaking countries to adopt English due to structural similarities. The European Union is slowly turning into the United States of Europe i.e. there are English-Germanic speaking majority countries within the EU that can form into another United States or Australian-style federation. Nordics has combined its airforce services into a single command. The Nordics + Netherlands population has 44 million population and when combined with Germany's 80 million population, it's 124 million. The Russian Federation has about 144 million population. Common language is used for communication.
    6
  579. 6
  580. 6
  581. 6
  582. 6
  583. 6
  584.  @grundgesetzart.1463  >Libya NATO STOPPED the bloody civil war in Libya. Putin STARTED the bloody war in Ukraine. On 16 August 2003, Libya formally admitted responsibility for Pan Am Flight 103 (Lockabie bombing) in a letter presented to the president of the United Nations Security Council. "On 10 March 2011, France was the first country in the world to recognise the National Transitional Council as the legitimate government of Libya". United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 was adopted by the United Nations Security Council on 17 March 2011 in response to the First Libyan Civil War. The Security Council resolution was proposed by France, Lebanon, and the United Kingdom. Muammar Gaddafi played stupid games and win stupid prizes. If, however, you are referring to the NATO intervention in Libya, that was NATO agreeing to enforce a United Nations Security Council Resolution. It was never intended as a permanent expansion of the Alliance to embrace Libya nor to establish a NATO base in the country. >Iraq Iraq invaded Kuwait. Iraq STARTED the bloody war in Kuwait. Iraq's top oil exports countries from Jan to Jun 2020 1st, China! 29 million tonnes <---- LOL 2nd, India, 23 million tonnes 3rd, EU, 8 million tonnes 4th, South Korea, 6 million tonnes 5th, Turkey, 4 million tonnes with an upwards trend 5th, USA, 4 million tonnes with a downwards trend Report: Saudi Arabia Presses U.S. on Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Date: January 19, 1992 From AP NEWS NEW YORK (AP) _ Saudi Arabia is pressuring the Bush administration to secretly arm and give intelligence to Iraqi opposition forces so they can work to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a newspaper reported Sunday. The Saudis want the United States to give arms and intelligence to Kurdish rebels in north Iraq, Shiite Muslim fighters in the south and Sunni Muslim opposition forces in central Iraq, the Times said, quoting U.S. and allied officials it didn’t name.
    6
  585. 6
  586. 6
  587. 6
  588. 6
  589. 6
  590. 6
  591. 6
  592. 6
  593. 6
  594. 6
  595. 6
  596. 6
  597. 6
  598. 6
  599. 6
  600. 6
  601. 6
  602. 6
  603. 6
  604. 6
  605. 6
  606. 6
  607. 6
  608. 6
  609. 6
  610. 6
  611. 6
  612. 6
  613. 6
  614. 6
  615. 6
  616.  @randomgaming8616  When stealth is not required for F-35A http://nettsteder.regjeringen.no/kampfly/2015/11/20/a-fly-f-35-erfaringer-fra-den-forste-uka/ More F-16 vs F-35 from Norwegian pilot. I quote Overall, flying the F-35 reminds me a bit of flying the F/A-18 Hornet, but with an important difference: It has been fitted with a turbo https://www.reddit.com/r/F35Lightning/comments/8a66ta/out_of_the_shadows_rnlaf_experiences_with_the/ Out Of The Shadows: RNLAF experiences with the F-35A - Combat Aircraft Magazine May 2018 1. Dutch F-35 Block 3F, "F-35 sits somewhere in between the F-16 and F/A-18 when it comes to within visual range manoeuvring'". 2. Lightest empty weight F-16A MLU air-superiority model needs to be clean (no weapons, no external tanks) to make visual range dogfight interesting against combat loaded F-35A Block 3F. 3. Dutch has acknowledged early F-35 Block builds being beaten by F-16s with external fuel tanks which are NOT applicable for F-35A Block 3F build. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3b-b762QRY Super Hornet's high angle of attack with minimum turn radius advantage holding its own against F-15's high energy turn rate advantage dogfight example. Major F-35A difference from Super Hornet is F-35A's superior acceleration and roll rates. http://www.f-16.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=5525&start=1335#wrapper From GTA4's post with OEM numbers, F-35A beating EuroFighter in acceleration. http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2009/07/i-flew-supersonic-barely-at-th/ F-35C has 300 degrees per second roll rate. F-35A roll rate: 300 deg/sec. Video proof. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qceZALofOcg&feature=youtu.be&t=1m15s http://theaviationist.com/2015/05/01/aileron-roll-in-t-346a/ According to most reports a Rafale features a maximum roll rate of 270 deg/s, the Eurofighter Typhoon is able of around 250 deg/s, the F/A-18E Super Hornet has a maximum roll rate of 120 deg/s whereas the F-16 can roll at 240 deg/s. Original source (non-English) http://suomenkuvalehti.fi/jutut/kotimaa/suomella-vahvat-ilmavoimat-mutta-kuinka-kauan/ Frisian Flag 2012 exercises in Holland, Finnish F-18Cs gets 100 kills and 6 loses against Eurofighter (Germany, UK), Polish new F-16 and older F-16 planes (Norway, Belgium) and Gripen (Swedish) Finland's F-18C has 16:1 kill ratio over Germany/UK's Eurofighter, Poland's F-16C Block 52+ and Norway/Belgium's F-16A MLU and Sweden's Gripen. F-16s and Eurocanards have an angle of attack capabilities less than 30 degrees.
    6
  617. 6
  618. 6
  619. 6
  620. 6
  621. Date: Jan. 7, 2010 Yanukovych: Ukraine will remain a neutral state. "It’s certain that Ukraine was and will be non-aligned state… We strive neither to join NATO nor the [CIS]CSTO [Collective Security Treaty Organization]. We’ll maintain a neutral status," Yanukovych said in an interview with the Komsomolskaya Pravda in Ukraine newspaper. -------- The trigger for Euromaidan was Yanukovych initiated non-neutrality policies such as joining a trade block instead of executing Switzerland-style neutrality. UK leaving the EU and joining CPTPP proves freedom of association. Before Euromaidan, Russia, however, has successfully used political and economic leverage to dissuade Ukraine from signing the E.U. deal. In the months prior to the Vilnius summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a trade war with Kiev, blocking nearly all imports from Ukraine and cutting energy supplies to the country. In turn, this reduced Ukrainian exports by 25 percent and shrank the economy by 1.5 percent. Some trade background for the context From Tradebarrier Index (lower score = less trade barriers) New Zealand's tariff score is 2.92 Australia's tariff score is 3.03 UK's tariff score is 3.94 (after Brexit) Japan's tariff score is 4.05 US's tariff score is 4.54 Germany's tariff score is 4.88 EU's tariff score is 4.88 Russia's tariff score is 6.16 <-------- China's tariff score is 6.8 <------ Russia wants to maintain its higher trade protectionist policies. On a side note, Trump is correct on the EU's higher trade protection when compared to the US.
    6
  622. 6
  623. 6
  624. 6
  625. 6
  626. 6
  627. 6
  628. 6
  629. 6
  630. 6
  631. 6
  632. 6
  633. 6
  634. 6
  635. 6
  636. 6
  637. 6
  638. 6
  639. 6
  640. 6
  641. 6
  642. 6
  643. 6
  644. 6
  645. 6
  646. A French lawmaker raised questions in the country’s parliament in June about Australian concerns over delays, and whether Australia might be considering submarine alternatives, French government records show. Proving the French were aware of the cost overruns and the failure to complete the design on time had created issues with the Australians. After Australia had spent 2.5 billion dollars for no tangible results. The French asked for an extension nearly two years ago which would extend the design completion date from July 2022 to September 2023. Cost overruns, failure to deliver contractual obligations on time, hostility from the French whenever Australia tried to work out these issues with the French. 2.5 billion dollars and no finished design after five years. That is a cost overrun and all the French lies and tantrums don't change the facts. France failed to honour the contract with Australia. Macron is a lying brat, he should explain why the French have failed to deliver when all they were doing is modifying an existing design from nuclear propulsion to diesel-electric propulsion. After five years and 2.5 billion dollars they did not even finish the design let alone start building the first sub in France as specified by the contract, nor did they start building a shipyard in Adelaide as specified by the contract. Why Australian media is spinning this issue with the French as Australia's fault when the evidence is there for all to see says everything about the Australian media. Whether you love him or hate him, Morrison pull the plug on a scam, a scam that cost Australia 2.5 billion dollars and was only going to get worse, for a submarine that belongs back in the 20th century and does not meet Australia's defence needs in the 21st Century.
    6
  647. 6
  648. 6
  649. 6
  650. 6
  651. 6
  652. 6
  653. 6
  654. 6
  655. 6
  656. 6
  657. 6
  658. 6
  659. 6
  660. 6
  661. 6
  662. 6
  663. 6
  664. 6
  665. 6
  666. 6
  667. 6
  668. 6
  669. 6
  670. 6
  671. 6
  672. 6
  673. 6
  674. 6
  675. 6
  676. 6
  677. 6
  678. 6
  679. 6
  680. 6
  681. 6
  682. 6
  683. 5
  684. 5
  685. 5
  686. 5
  687. 5
  688. 5
  689. 5
  690. 5
  691. 5
  692. 5
  693. 5
  694. 5
  695. 5
  696. 5
  697. 5
  698. 5
  699. 5
  700. 5
  701. 5
  702. 5
  703. 5
  704. 5
  705. 5
  706. 5
  707. 5
  708. 5
  709. 5
  710. 5
  711. 5
  712. 5
  713. 5
  714. 5
  715. 5
  716. 5
  717. 5
  718. 5
  719. 5
  720. 5
  721. 5
  722. 5
  723. 5
  724. 5
  725. 5
  726. 5
  727.  @princevelkan04  For Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum context, Russia, the US and the UK confirmed their Ukraine becoming parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and effectively abandoning their nuclear arsenal to Russia and that they would: 1. Respect Ukrainian independence and sovereignty in the existing borders. 2. Refrain from the threat or the use of force against Ukraine. 3. Refrain from using economic pressure on Ukraine to influence their politics. 4. Seek immediate Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine if they "should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used". 5. Refrain from the use of nuclear arms against Ukraine. 6. Consult with one another if questions arise regarding those commitments. China and France gave somewhat weaker individual assurances in separate documents. US and UK are fulfilling points 4 and 6 in accordance with Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum. Budapest Memorandum's security assurances are weaker than NATO's Article V and EU's Article 42.7. Are you arguing for the US to abandon the Budapest Memorandum? ----- Date: Jan. 7, 2010 Yanukovych: Ukraine will remain a neutral state. "It’s certain that Ukraine was and will be non-aligned state… We strive neither to join NATO nor the [CIS]CSTO [Collective Security Treaty Organization]. We’ll maintain a neutral status," Yanukovych said in an interview with the Komsomolskaya Pravda in Ukraine newspaper. -------- The trigger for Euromaidan was Yanukovych initiated non-neutrality policies such as joining a trade block instead of executing Switzerland-style neutrality. Before Euromaidan, Russia, however, has successfully used political and economic leverage to dissuade Ukraine from signing the E.U. deal. In the months prior to the Vilnius summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a trade war with Kiev, blocking nearly all imports from Ukraine and cutting energy supplies to the country. In turn, this reduced Ukrainian exports by 25 percent and shrank the economy by 1.5 percent. UK leaving the EU and joining CPTPP proves freedom of association. Some trade background for the context From Tradebarrier Index New Zealand's tariff score is 2.92 Australia's tariff score is 3.03 UK's tariff score is 3.94 (after Brexit) Japan's tariff score is 4.05 US's tariff score is 4.54 Germany's tariff score is 4.88 EU's tariff score is 4.88 Russia's tariff score is 6.16 <-------- China's tariff score is 6.8 <------ Russia wants to maintain its higher trade protectionist policies.
    5
  728. 5
  729. 5
  730. 5
  731. 5
  732. 5
  733. 5
  734.  @Pats4lyfe  Turkey's GDP is half of Australia's GDP Russia's GDP is similar to Canada's and Australia's GDP Turkey wasn't key developer for F-35 ttps://www.defensenews.com/air/2018/12/04/no-devastating-impact-to-f-35-industrial-base-if-turkey-pushed-from-program-air-force-official-says/ No ‘devastating impact’ to F-35 industrial base if Turkey removed from program, says US Air Force official Turkey's Participation 1. Alp Aviation, Titanium integrally bladed rotors for F135 engine. Pratt & Whitney's out-sourcing. Not the only company with Titanium forging capability. https://3dprintingindustry.com/news/norsk-titanium-pratt-whitney-3d-printed-integrally-bladed-rotor-and-more-aerospace-announcements-136551/ Norway's Norsk Titanium, alternative source for manufactured integrally bladed Titanium rotor Dated: JULY 19th, 2018 2. AYESAS, Circuit card subassembly portions of Missile Remote Interface Unit. Not the only company with this capability. 3. Fokker Elmo, 40 percent of the F-35 Electrical Wiring & Interconnection System (EWIS). Not the only company with this capability. 4. Kale Aero, Fuselage Sections: Fuselage parts manufacture & processing, for LM Aero/Northrop Grumman/TAI. Not the only company with this capability. 5. Turkish Aerospace Industries, TAI manufactures and assembles the center fuselages, produces composite skins and weapon bay doors, and manufactures fiber placement composite air inlet ducts. Not the only company with this capability. It's Northrop Grumman responsibility for main centre fuselage and Northrop Grumman out source it .
    5
  735. 5
  736. 5
  737. 5
  738. 5
  739. 5
  740. 5
  741. 5
  742. 5
  743. 5
  744. 5
  745. 5
  746. 5
  747. 5
  748. 5
  749. 5
  750. 5
  751. 5
  752. 5
  753. 5
  754. 5
  755. 5
  756. 5
  757. 5
  758. 5
  759. 5
  760. 5
  761. 5
  762. 5
  763. 5
  764. 5
  765. 5
  766. 5
  767. 5
  768. 5
  769. 5
  770. 5
  771. 5
  772. 5
  773. 5
  774. 5
  775. 5
  776. 5
  777. 5
  778. 5
  779. 5
  780. 5
  781. 5
  782. 5
  783. 5
  784. 5
  785.  @michaelmanning5379  The Crimean Tatars were formed as a people in Crimea and are descendants of various peoples who lived in Crimea in different historical eras. The main ethnic groups that inhabited the Crimea at various times and took part in the formation of the Crimean Tatar people are Tauri, Scythians, Sarmatians, Alans, Greeks, Goths, Bulgars, Khazars, Pechenegs, Italians and Circassians. At the beginning of the 13th century, the Crimea, the majority of the population of which was already composed of a Turkic people — Cumans, became a part of the Golden Horde. The Crimean Tatars mostly adopted Islam in the 14th century and thereafter Crimea became one of the centers of Islamic civilization in Eastern Europe. In the same century, trends towards separatism appeared in the Crimean Ulus of the Golden Horde. De facto independence of the Crimea from the Golden Horde may be counted since the beginning of princess (khanum) Canike's, the daughter of the powerful Khan of the Golden Horde Tokhtamysh and the wife of the founder of the Nogai Horde Edigey, reign in the peninsula. During her reign she strongly supported Hacı Giray in the struggle for the Crimean throne until her death in 1437. Following the death of Сanike, the situation of Hacı Giray in Crimea weakened and he was forced to leave Crimea for Lithuania. The Crimean Tatars emerged as a nation at the time of the Crimean Khanate, an Ottoman vassal state during the 16th to 18th centuries.[50] Russian historian, doctor of history, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences Ilya Zaytsev writes that analysis of historical data shows that the influence of Turkey on the policy of the Crimea was not as high as it was reported in old Turkish sources and Imperial Russian ones.[51] The Turkic-speaking population of Crimea had mostly adopted Islam already in the 14th century, following the conversion of Ozbeg Khan of the Golden Horde.[52] By the time of the first Russian invasion of Crimea in 1736, the Khan's archives and libraries were famous throughout the Islamic world, and under Khan Krym-Girei the city of Aqmescit was endowed with piped water, sewerage and a theatre where Molière was performed in French, while the port of Kezlev stood comparison with Rotterdam and Bakhchysarai, the capital, was described as Europe's cleanest and greenest city
    5
  786. 5
  787. 5
  788. 5
  789. 5
  790. 5
  791. 5
  792. 5
  793. 5
  794. 5
  795. 5
  796. 5
  797. 5
  798. 5
  799. 5
  800. 5
  801. 5
  802. 5
  803. 5
  804. 5
  805. 5
  806. 5
  807. 5
  808. 5
  809. 5
  810. 5
  811. 5
  812. 5
  813. 5
  814. 5
  815. 5
  816. 5
  817. 5
  818. 5
  819. 5
  820. For Nigeria, Before British colonization, at the beginning of the 19th century, Usman dan Fodio led a successful jihad against the Hausa Kingdoms founding the centralised Sokoto Caliphate. The empire with Arabic as its official language grew rapidly under his rule and that of his descendants, who sent out invading armies in every direction. The vast landlocked empire connected the east with the western Sudan region and made inroads down south conquering parts of the Oyo Empire (modern-day Kwara), and advanced towards the Yoruba heartland of Ibadan, to reach the Atlantic Ocean. The territory controlled by the empire included much of modern-day northern and central Nigeria. The sultan sent out emirs to establish a suzerainty over the conquered territories and promote Islamic civilization, the emirs in turn became increasingly rich and powerful through trade and slavery. By the 1890s, the largest slave population in the world, about two million, was concentrated in the territories of the Sokoto Caliphate. The use of slave labour was extensive, especially in agriculture. In 1885, British claims to a West African sphere of influence received recognition from other European nations at the Berlin Conference. The following year, it chartered the Royal Niger Company under the leadership of Sir George Taubman Goldie. By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the company had vastly succeeded in subjugating the independent southern kingdoms along the Niger River, the British conquered Benin in 1897, and, in the Anglo-Aro War (1901–1902), defeated other opponents. The defeat of these states opened up the Niger area to British rule. In 1900, the company's territory came under the direct control of the British government and established the Southern Nigeria Protectorate as a British protectorate and part of the British Empire, the foremost world power at the time. Nigeria was independent since October 1st, 1960. ---- Starting from 1801, the Barbary Wars were a series of two wars fought by the United States, Sweden, and the Kingdom of Sicily against the Ottoman Empire's pro-slave traders Barbary states (including Tunis, Algiers, and Tripoli) of North Africa in the early 19th century. US's anti-slavery direction lead to the 1861 US civil war with Republican-governed anti-slavery USA vs Democrat-governed pro-slavery CSA.
    5
  821. 5
  822. 5
  823. 5
  824. 5
  825. 5
  826. 5
  827. 5
  828. 5
  829. 5
  830. 5
  831. 5
  832. 5
  833. 5
  834. 5
  835. 5
  836. 5
  837. 5
  838. 5
  839. 5
  840. 5
  841. 5
  842. 5
  843. 5
  844. 5
  845. 5
  846. 5
  847. 5
  848. 5
  849. 5
  850. 5
  851. 5
  852. 5
  853. 5
  854. 5
  855. 5
  856. 5
  857. 5
  858.  @isaiahlee2902  "Eurofighter Typhoon is likely to outmaneuver an F-22 Raptor in close combat" argument doesn't show the kill ratio. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6JSv8xHTbA Danish F-16A MLU beating Italy's EuroFighter dogfight example, but this doesn't tell the kill ratio. Original source (non-English) http://suomenkuvalehti.fi/jutut/kotimaa/suomella-vahvat-ilmavoimat-mutta-kuinka-kauan/ Frisian Flag 2012 exercises in Holland, Finnish F-18Cs gets 100 kills and 6 loses against Eurofighter (Germany, UK), Polish new F-16 and older F-16 planes (Norway, Belgium) and Gripen (Swedish) Finland's F-18C has 16:1 kill ratio over Germany/UK's Eurofighter, Poland's F-16C Block 52+ and Norway/Belgium's F-16A MLU and Sweden's Gripen. https://www.reddit.com/r/F35Lightning/comments/8a66ta/out_of_the_shadows_rnlaf_experiences_with_the/ Out Of The Shadows: RNLAF experiences with the F-35A - Combat Aircraft Magazine May 2018 For Dutch F-35 Block 3F, 1. "F-35 sits somewhere in between the F-16 and F/A-18 when it comes to within visual range manoeuvring'". 2. F-16A needs to be clean (without weapons) to make visual range dogfight interesting for F-35A Block 3F (9G). 3. Dutch acknowledge older F-35A pre-Block 3F getting beaten by F-16A with external fual tanks which changed with 9G F-35A Block 3F. http://nettsteder.regjeringen.no/kampfly/2015/11/20/a-fly-f-35-erfaringer-fra-den-forste-uka/ More F-16 vs F-35 from Norwegian pilot. I quote Overall, flying the F-35 reminds me a bit of flying the F/A-18 Hornet, but with an important difference: It has been fitted with a turbo https://theaviationist.com/2019/02/28/poland-making-steps-towards-procuring-32-f-35-fifth-generation-jets/ Poland to purchase 32 F-35A units. Poland has Israeli upgraded MiG 29 and F-16C Block 52. Poland, Norway and Belgium has selected F-35A over losers in Frisian Flag 2012.
    5
  859. 5
  860. 5
  861. 5
  862. 5
  863. 5
  864. 5
  865. 5
  866. 5
  867. 5
  868. 5
  869. 5
  870. 5
  871. 5
  872. 5
  873. 5
  874. 5
  875. 5
  876. 5
  877. 5
  878. 5
  879. 5
  880. 5
  881. 5
  882. 5
  883. 5
  884. 5
  885. 5
  886. 5
  887. 4
  888. 4
  889. 4
  890. 4
  891. 4
  892. 4
  893. 4
  894. 4
  895. 4
  896. 4
  897. 4
  898. 4
  899. 4
  900. 4
  901. 4
  902. 4
  903. 4
  904. 4
  905. 4
  906. 4
  907. 4
  908. 4
  909. 4
  910. 4
  911. 4
  912. 4
  913. 4
  914. 4
  915. 4
  916. 4
  917. 4
  918. 4
  919. 4
  920. 4
  921. 4
  922. 4
  923. 4
  924. 4
  925. 4
  926. 4
  927. 4
  928. 4
  929. 4
  930. 4
  931. 4
  932. 4
  933. 4
  934. 4
  935. 4
  936. 4
  937. 4
  938. 4
  939. 4
  940. 4
  941. 4
  942. 4
  943. 4
  944. 4
  945. 4
  946. 4
  947. 4
  948. 4
  949. 4
  950. 4
  951. 4
  952. 4
  953. 4
  954. 4
  955. 4
  956. 4
  957. 4
  958. 4
  959. 4
  960. 4
  961. 4
  962. 4
  963. 4
  964. 4
  965. 4
  966. 4
  967. 4
  968. 4
  969. 4
  970. 4
  971. 4
  972. 4
  973. 4
  974. 4
  975. 4
  976. 4
  977. 4
  978. 4
  979. 4
  980. 4
  981. 4
  982. 4
  983. 4
  984. 4
  985. 4
  986. 4
  987. 4
  988. 4
  989. 4
  990. 4
  991. 4
  992. 4
  993. 4
  994. 4
  995. 4
  996. 4
  997. 4
  998. 4
  999. 4
  1000. 4
  1001. 4
  1002.  @hi90163  For Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum context, Russia, the US and the UK confirmed their Ukraine becoming parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and effectively abandoning their nuclear arsenal to Russia and that they would: 1. Respect Ukrainian independence and sovereignty in the existing borders. 2. Refrain from the threat or the use of force against Ukraine. 3. Refrain from using economic pressure on Ukraine to influence their politics. 4. Seek immediate Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine if they "should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used". 5. Refrain from the use of nuclear arms against Ukraine. 6. Consult with one another if questions arise regarding those commitments. China and France gave somewhat weaker individual assurances in separate documents. US and UK are fulfilling points 4 and 6 in accordance with Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum. Budapest Memorandum's security assurances are weaker than NATO's Article V and EU's Article 42.7. Are you arguing for the UK to abandon the Budapest Memorandum? When all countries who signed Budapest Memorandum have exited from the agreement, then Ukraine is not bound by the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons treaty. Ukraine already reminded the west, they are ready to re-arm with nuclear weapons if the west doesn't fulfill Budapest Memorandum's security assurances. Australia has sold uranium to Ukraine.
    4
  1003. 4
  1004. 4
  1005.  @blugaledoh2669  We cannot buy our security, our freedom from the threat of the bomb by committing an immorality so great as saying to a billion human beings now enslaved behind the Iron Curtain, "Give up your dreams of freedom because to save our own skins, we're willing to make a deal with your slave masters." Alexander Hamilton said, "A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one." Now let's set the record straight. There's no argument over the choice between peace and war, but there's only one guaranteed way you can have peace -- and you can have it in the next second -- surrender. Admittedly, there's a risk in any course we follow other than this, but every lesson of history tells us that the greater risk lies in appeasement, and this is the specter our well-meaning liberal friends refuse to face -- that their policy of accommodation is appeasement, and it gives no choice between peace and war, only between fight or surrender. If we continue to accommodate, continue to back and retreat, eventually we have to face the final demand -- the ultimatum. And what then -- when Nikita Khrushchev has told his people he knows what our answer will be? He has told them that we're retreating under the pressure of the Cold War, and someday when the time comes to deliver the final ultimatum, our surrender will be voluntary, because by that time we will have been weakened from within spiritually, morally, and economically. He believes this because from our side he's heard voices pleading for "peace at any price" or "better Red than dead," or as one commentator put it, he'd rather "live on his knees than die on his feet." And therein lies the road to war, because those voices don't speak for the rest of us. From Ronald Reagan. --------- Replace Nikita Khrushchev with Vladimir Putin.
    4
  1006. 4
  1007. 4
  1008. 4
  1009. 4
  1010. 4
  1011. 4
  1012. Russia lied about not invading Ukraine. Date: February 24, 2022 Speaker: Vasily Nebenzya, Permanent Representative of Russia to the United Nations. Quote: "During this [emergency session of the UN security council], the President of Russia, [Vladmir] Putin said that he had made a decision for a special military operation in the Donbas … From [Putin’s] statement ,the occupation of Ukraine is not in our plans.” ----- Date: February 24, 2022 Speaker: Leonid Slutsky, Russian State Duma Committee on Foreign Affairs Quote: "We do not intend to unleash any war. We are not going to invade Ukraine as we are being accused of in Ukraine itself and not only there.” Source: TASS, Russian state news agency ----- Date: February 20, 2022 Speaker: Anatoly Antonov, Russian Ambassador to the United States Quote: "There are no such plans [for an invasion of Ukraine] … Russia has publicly declared its readiness to continue diplomatic efforts to resolve all outstanding issues … Russian troops are on sovereign Russian territory. We don't threaten anyone." ----- Date: February 16, 2022 Speaker: Vladimir Chizhov, Russia’s envoy to the European Union Quote: “As far as Russia is concerned, I can assure you that there will be no attack this Wednesday. There will be no escalation in the coming week either, or in the week after that, or in the coming month. Wars in Europe rarely start on a Wednesday." ----- Date: February 16, 2022 Speaker: Maria Zakharova, Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Quote: "I’d like to request U.S. and British disinformation: Bloomberg, The New York Times and The Sun media outlets to publish the schedule for our upcoming invasions for the year. I’d like to plan my vacation.” ----- Date: February 16, 2022 Speaker: Dmitry Polyanskiy, Russia's Deputy Ambassador to the United Nations Quote: “Why such hysteria this time? This is absolutely artificial hype, [an] artificial problem. Those who escalate it, this problem, should de-escalate. And it’s not Russia who did so … As any country, if we are not attacked or provoked … there will be no war that we initiate.” ----- Date: February 15, 2022 Speaker: Sergey Lavrov, Russian foreign minister Quote: "As for drills that Russia conducts on its own territory and in accordance with its own plans … they begin, are implemented and concluded as planned … This is done irrespective of who thinks what, who is hysterical about [Russia’s alleged preparations for an invasion of Ukraine] and how, who and how is setting in motion real information terrorism. I’m not afraid of that word.” ----- Date: February 12, 2022 Speaker: Maria Zakharova, Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Quote: "The hysteria of the White House is more indicative than ever. The Anglo-Saxons need a war. At any cost. Provocations, misinformation and threats are a favorite method of solving their own problems." ----- Date: February 12, 2022 Speaker: Vladimir Putin, Russian president Quote: "The facts are that Americans are artificially whipping up hysteria around an alleged Russian plans for the invasion, even providing the dates of such an invasion … Conditions are being created for the Ukrainian armed forces to take provocative actions amid allegations about an ‘invasion.’” ----- Date: January 31, 2022 Speaker: Vasily Nebenzya, Permanent Representative of Russia to the United Nations Quote: “Not a single Russian politician, not a single public figure, not a single person said that we are planning to attack Ukraine.” ----- Date: January 28, 2022 Speaker: Sergey Lavrov, Russian foreign minister Quote: "If it depends on the Russian Federation, there will be no war … We do not want wars, but we will not allow our interests to be rudely attacked, we will not allow our interests to be ignored." ----- Date: January 28, 2022 Speaker: Oleg Stepanov, Russian Ambassador to Canada Quote: "[Russia] will not invade Ukraine. ... We are not going to ... try to disrupt that territorial integrity of Ukraine. We recognize Ukraine as a sovereign state."
    4
  1013. 4
  1014. 4
  1015. 4
  1016. 4
  1017. 4
  1018. 4
  1019. 4
  1020. 4
  1021. 4
  1022. 4
  1023. 4
  1024. 4
  1025. 4
  1026. 4
  1027. 4
  1028. 4
  1029. 4
  1030. 4
  1031. 4
  1032. 4
  1033. 4
  1034. 4
  1035. 4
  1036. 4
  1037. 4
  1038. 4
  1039. 4
  1040. 4
  1041. Anthony Albanese's argument position is with France 1st. France has backed Italy’s decision to block COVID-19 vaccine exports to Australia. --- A French lawmaker raised questions in the country’s parliament in June about Australian concerns over delays, and whether Australia might be considering submarine alternatives, French government records show. Proving the French were aware of the cost overruns and the failure to complete the design on time had created issues with the Australians. After Australia had spent 2.5 billion dollars for no tangible results. The French asked for an extension nearly two years ago which would extend the design completion date from July 2022 to September 2023. Cost overruns, failure to deliver contractual obligations on time, hostility from the French whenever Australia tried to work out these issues with the French. 2.5 billion dollars and no finished design after five years. That is a cost overrun and all the French lies and tantrums don't change the facts. France failed to honour the contract with Australia. Macron is a lying brat, he should explain why the French have failed to deliver when all they were doing is modifying an existing design from nuclear propulsion to diesel-electric propulsion. After five years and 2.5 billion dollars they did not even finish the design let alone start building the first sub in France as specified by the contract, nor did they start building a shipyard in Adelaide as specified by the contract. Why Australian media is spinning this issue with the French as Australia's fault when the evidence is there for all to see says everything about the Australian media. Whether you love him or hate him, Morrison pull the plug on a scam, a scam that cost Australia 2.5 billion dollars and was only going to get worse, for a submarine that belongs back in the 20th century and does not meet Australia's defence needs in the 21st Century.
    4
  1042. 4
  1043. 4
  1044. 4
  1045. 4
  1046. 4
  1047. 4
  1048. 4
  1049. 4
  1050. 4
  1051. 4
  1052.  @AbdullahKhan-dc3vi  Putin: “Speaking of security guarantees … our actions will not depend upon the negotiations, they will depend on the unconditional compliance with Russian security demands”. The main articles of Russian draft proposed agreement demand included eight articles with the following points: Article 1: the parties should not strengthen their security at the expense of Russia’s security; Article 2: the parties will use multilateral consultations and the NATO-Russia Council to address points of conflict; Article 3: the parties reaffirm that they do not consider each other as adversaries and maintain a dialogue; Article 4: the parties shall not deploy military forces and weaponry on the territory of any of the other states in Europe in addition to any forces that were deployed as of May 27, 1997; Article 5: the parties shall not deploy land-based intermediate- and short-range missiles adjacent to the other parties; Article 6: all member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization commit themselves to refrain from any further enlargement of NATO, including the accession of Ukraine as well as other States; Article 7: the parties that are member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization shall not conduct any military activity on the territory of Ukraine as well as other States in the Eastern Europe, in the South Caucasus and in Central Asia; and Article 8: the agreement shall not be interpreted as affecting the primary responsibility of the Security Council of the United Nations for maintaining international peace and security. ---- Fact: many eastern European countries (from the Three Seas Initiative) have major PTSD issues against Russia. Romania's government has condemned Putin's demand to remove Romania's freedom of association. Finland's government has condemned Putin's demand to remove Finland's freedom of association. Estonia's government has condemned Putin's demand to remove Estonia's freedom of association. Latvia's government has condemned Putin's demand to remove Latvia's freedom of association. Lithuania's government has condemned Putin's demand to remove Lithuania's freedom of association. Poland's government has condemned Putin's demand to remove Poland's freedom of association. Bulgaria's government has condemned Putin's demand to remove Bulgaria's freedom of association. Sweden's government has condemned Putin's demand to remove Sweden's freedom of association. Against Russian demands, Swedish Foreign Minister Ann Linde: "The Swedish security policy is determined by Sweden. Russia has nothing to do with our independent decisions”. There's nothing noble about territorial grabbing from another country like an "old school" European imperialist.
    4
  1053. 4
  1054. 4
  1055. 4
  1056.  @michaelroot6064  Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government (since its formation) had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq
    4
  1057. 4
  1058. 4
  1059. 4
  1060. 4
  1061. 4
  1062. 4
  1063. 4
  1064.  @dorinpopa6962  The core issue Date: Jan. 7, 2010 Yanukovych: Ukraine will remain a neutral state. "It’s certain that Ukraine was and will be non-aligned state… We strive neither to join NATO nor the [CIS]CSTO [Collective Security Treaty Organization]. We’ll maintain a neutral status," Yanukovych said in an interview with the Komsomolskaya Pravda in Ukraine newspaper. -------- The trigger for Euromaidan was Yanukovych initiated non-neutrality policies such as joining a trade block instead of executing Switzerland-style neutrality. UK leaving the EU and joining CPTPP proves freedom of association. Before Euromaidan, Russia, however, has successfully used political and economic leverage to dissuade Ukraine from signing the E.U. deal. In the months prior to the Vilnius summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a trade war with Kiev, blocking nearly all imports from Ukraine and cutting energy supplies to the country. In turn, this reduced Ukrainian exports by 25 percent and shrank the economy by 1.5 percent. Some trade background for the context From Tradebarrier Index (lower score = less trade barriers) New Zealand's tariff score is 2.92 Australia's tariff score is 3.03 UK's tariff score is 3.94 (after Brexit) Japan's tariff score is 4.05 US's tariff score is 4.54 Germany's tariff score is 4.88 EU's tariff score is 4.88 Russia's tariff score is 6.16 <-------- China's tariff score is 6.8 <------ Russia wants to maintain its higher trade protectionist policies. Ukraine's FTA can be either Eurasian Union or European Union, but NOT both.
    4
  1065. 4
  1066. 4
  1067. 4
  1068. 4
  1069. 4
  1070. 4
  1071. 4
  1072. 4
  1073. 4
  1074. 4
  1075. 4
  1076. 4
  1077. 4
  1078. 4
  1079. 4
  1080. 4
  1081. 4
  1082. 4
  1083. 4
  1084. 4
  1085. 4
  1086.  @personaa422  From https://mises.org/library/business-under-nazis It was common in those days, as it is in ours, to identify the Communists as leftist and the Nazis as rightists, as if they stood on opposite ends of the ideological spectrum. But Mises knew differently. They both sported the same ideological pedigree of socialism . "The German and Russian systems of socialism have in common the fact that the government has full control of the means of production. It decides what shall be produced and how. It allots to each individual a share of consumer's goods for his consumption." The difference between the systems, wrote Mises, is that the German pattern "maintains private ownership of the means of production and keeps the appearance of ordinary prices, wages, and markets." But in fact the government directs production decisions, curbs entrepreneurship and the labor market, and determines wages and interest rates by central authority. "Market exchange," says Mises, "is only a sham." Mises's account is confirmed by a remarkable book that appeared in 1939, published by Vanguard Press in New York City (and unfortunately out of print today). It is The Vampire Economy: Doing Business Under Fascism by Guenter Reimann, then a 35-year-old German writer. Through contacts with German business owners, Reimann documented how the "monster machine" of the Nazis crushed the autonomy of the private sector through onerous regulations, harsh inspections, and the threat of confiscatory fines for petty offenses. ----- Try again.
    4
  1087. 4
  1088. 4
  1089. 4
  1090. 4
  1091. 4
  1092.  @driesherreman6894  U.S. interventions in the Middle East area started from First Barbary War https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War Conflict: U.S.A vs Islamic Ottoman Empire. U.S. is joined by the Kingdom of Sicily and Kingdom of Sweden Goals: Stopping Ottoman's slavery on US trade. Both Kingdom of Sicily and the Kingdom of Sweden have pre-existing conflicts against the Ottoman Empire's slaving Europeans. -------------- In March 1786, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams went to London to negotiate with Tripoli's envoy, ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman (or Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja). When they enquired "concerning the ground of the pretensions to make war upon nations who had done them no injury", the ambassador replied: It was written in their Koran, (that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise). He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck of an enemy's ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into the foe that they cried out for quarter at once.[25] -------------- This is an existing "old world" issue. The 1st Barbary War leads to the U.S creating the Department of Navy, anti-slavery direction, and infamous freedom of navigation foreign policy.
    4
  1093. 4
  1094. @Mr. Mohammed Designer — المصمم محمد الكثيري Your "It’s the western countries like France that doing the problems and wars in Muslim countries" is bullsshit http://www.businessinsider.com/bnd-report-on-saudi-arabias-power-struggle-2015-12 Germany's intelligence agency says Saudi Arabia's 'game of thrones' risks tearing the Middle East apart. From https://www.reuters.com/article/us-opec-meeting-shale/inside-opec-room-naimi-declares-price-war-on-u-s-shale-oil-idUSKCN0JC1GK20141128 Saudi Arabia declares war on US shale oil. What do we have here? Another attempt to make US being Saudi Arabia's armed proxy . fvckoff http://www.businessinsider.com/turkey-and-saudi-arabia-collaborating-in-syria-2015-5?IR=T Sunni dominated Turkey and Saudi Arabia are officially collaborating to bring down Assad in Syria https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2014/12/12/why-turkeys-president-wants-to-revive-the-language-of-the-ottoman-empire/ *Turkey wants to revive the Ottoman Empire*, hence they have their goals and objectives. https://www.rt.com/usa/326748-us-syria-intelligence-hersh/ US military provided Assad with intel on extremists via Russia, Israel & Germany The Turkish government has refused to halt the flow of foreign jihadists going through Turkey because President Erdogan “is dreaming big – of restoring the Ottoman Empire – and he did not realize the extent to which he could be successful in this.” When rival German/American/Australian western news media vs Russian news media has similar conclusions that a certain Middle East country or countries playing 'game of thrones', then there's a problem. Try again.
    4
  1095. 4
  1096. 4
  1097. 4
  1098. 4
  1099. 4
  1100. 4
  1101. 4
  1102. 4
  1103. 4
  1104. 4
  1105. 4
  1106. 4
  1107. 4
  1108. 4
  1109. 4
  1110. 4
  1111. 4
  1112. 4
  1113. 4
  1114. 4
  1115. 4
  1116. 4
  1117. 4
  1118. 4
  1119. 4
  1120. 4
  1121. 4
  1122. 4
  1123. 4
  1124. 4
  1125. 4
  1126. 4
  1127. 4
  1128. 4
  1129. 4
  1130. 4
  1131. 4
  1132. 4
  1133. 4
  1134. 4
  1135. 4
  1136. 4
  1137. 4
  1138. 4
  1139. 4
  1140. 4
  1141. 4
  1142. 4
  1143. 4
  1144. 4
  1145. 4
  1146. 4
  1147. 4
  1148. 4
  1149. 4
  1150. 4
  1151. 4
  1152. 4
  1153. 4
  1154. 4
  1155. 4
  1156. 4
  1157. 4
  1158. 4
  1159. 4
  1160. 4
  1161. 4
  1162. 4
  1163. 4
  1164. 4
  1165. 4
  1166. 4
  1167. 4
  1168. 4
  1169. 4
  1170. 4
  1171. 4
  1172. 4
  1173. 4
  1174. 4
  1175. 4
  1176. 4
  1177. 4
  1178. 4
  1179. 4
  1180. 4
  1181. 4
  1182. 4
  1183. 4
  1184. 4
  1185. 4
  1186. 4
  1187. 4
  1188. 4
  1189. 4
  1190. Facts from Lockheed’s codeone magazine https://www.codeonemagazine.com/article.html?item_id=137 By the late 1960s, Pratt & Whitney was designing and testing a three-bearing swivel nozzle for use on the Convair Model 200 Sea Control fighter. Design drawings dated 1967 show detail design layouts. The first nozzle was built and tested on a Pratt & Whitney JT8D in the mid 1960s. The tests included operating the nozzle in full afterburner with the nozzle deflected ninety degrees. The test rig was positioned to exhaust upward to avoid heating the ground under the test stand, though subsequent tests positioned the nozzle downward at the ground to assess the effects of ground proximity back pressure on nozzle performance. http://www.codeonemagazine.com/article.html?item_id=137 A great deal of misinformation has appeared on the Internet regarding the relationship of the Soviet Yak-41 (later Yak-141), NATO reporting name Freestyle, to the X-35 and the rest of the JSF program. The Pratt & Whitney 3BSD nozzle design predates the Russian work. In fact the 3BSD was tested with a real engine almost twenty years before the first flight of the Yak. Yakovlev was looking for money to keep its VTOL program alive, not having received any orders for a production version of the Yak-141. Lockheed provided a small amount of funding in return for obtaining performance data and limited design data on the Yak-141. US government personnel were allowed to examine the aircraft. *However, the 3BSN design was already in place on the X-35 before these visits*. -------- Yak copied the same flawed 3 engine hot cores design from Convair Model 200. F-35 has a single-engine hot core. Yak 141's forward hot air flow degrades the main engine's effective thurst.
    4
  1191. 4
  1192. 4
  1193. 4
  1194. 4
  1195. 4
  1196. 4
  1197. 4
  1198. 4
  1199. 4
  1200. 4
  1201. 4
  1202. 4
  1203. 4
  1204. 4
  1205. 4
  1206. 4
  1207. 4
  1208. 4
  1209. 4
  1210. 4
  1211. 4
  1212. 4
  1213. 4
  1214. 4
  1215. 4
  1216. 4
  1217. 4
  1218. 4
  1219. 4
  1220. 4
  1221. 4
  1222. @Wilhelm Eley Timeline of Yugoslav breakup 22 January 1990: Slovenian, Croatian and Macedonian delegates abandon the last Congress of the Communist League of Yugoslavia. The Communist Party of Yugoslavia is dissolved. 1 July 1990: The Parliament of Slovenia votes to declare independence (but independence is not proclaimed). 1 October 1990: George Bush, in a meeting with the Yugoslav president of the Presidency, gives full support to Yugoslavia. 21 February 1991: After receiving news of the Slovenian parliament's decision to start legal actions for independence and for the possible creation of new union of independent states, the Croatian parliament makes a similar decision. 25 September 1991: Macedonia declares independence. 8 October 1991: Croatia declares independence from Yugoslavia. 2 December 1991: President of Macedonia sends an official letter to the presidents of the foreign governments asking for recognition of the independence of Macedonia. Immediately after that Greece starts military provocations on the Macedonian-Greece border. .. 19 December 1991: Germany announces that it will recognize Croatia on January 15, 1992, with or without the rest of the European Community. 23 December 1991: Germany becomes the first major power to recognize Croatia and Slovenia as independent states 15 January 1992: The European Community recognizes Slovenia and Croatia. ------------------- Without NATO, Germany would have done it alone and we would have another WW1 trigger i.e. Russia would have declared war against Germany as in WWI. It's in Russia's interest to decouple North America's raw material security guarantees from mainland Europe that will enable Russia to win any war of attrition against France or Germany! Germany used NATO with North America's raw material security guarantees to further its own interest when it failed in WW1's goals. NATO was used to check Russia and avoid the WW1 trigger. Can France factor in Germany's self-interest in Croatia at the expense of Serbia (again )?
    4
  1223. 4
  1224. 4
  1225. 4
  1226. 4
  1227. 4
  1228. 4
  1229. 4
  1230. 4
  1231. 4
  1232. 3
  1233. 3
  1234. 3
  1235. 3
  1236. 3
  1237. 3
  1238. 3
  1239. 3
  1240. 3
  1241. 3
  1242. 3
  1243. 3
  1244. 3
  1245. 3
  1246.  @seventhuser904  That's a false equivalence. Unlike Russia, the US did NOT assimilate Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, and Yugoslavia into US federal structure. >Yugoslavia 9 February 1994: At UN request, NATO agreed to authorise air strikes, declared 20 km total exclusion zone around Sarajevo and required Bosnian Serbs to withdraw heavy weapons from zone or place them under UN control within 10 days; also called on Bosnian Government to place heavy weapons in Sarajevo under UN control. Agreement between 'RS' and Bosnian Government to a ceasefire in Sarajevo, negotiated by Lieutenant-General Sir Michael Rose, then Commander of UN forces in Bosnia. UN Security Council through UNSCR 836 of 4 June 1994 authorizes the use of air power to defend the safe areas created by UN Security Council resolution 824 of 6 May 1993. Paragraph 10 of UNSCR 836 stipulates: "...Member States, acting nationally or through regional organisations or arrangements, may take, under the authority of the Security Council and subject to close coordination with the Secretary-General and UNPROFOR, all necessary measures, through the use of air power, in and around the safe areas in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, to support UNPROFOR in the performance of its mandate..." >Libya NATO STOPPED the bloody civil war in Libya. Putin STARTED the bloody war in Ukraine. On 16 August 2003, Libya formally admitted responsibility for Pan Am Flight 103 (Lockabie bombing) in a letter presented to the president of the United Nations Security Council. "On 10 March 2011, France was the first country in the world to recognise the National Transitional Council as the legitimate government of Libya". United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 was adopted by the United Nations Security Council on 17 March 2011 in response to the First Libyan Civil War. The Security Council resolution was proposed by France, Lebanon, and the United Kingdom. Muammar Gaddafi played stupid games and win stupid prizes. The US supported France(EU)'s and UK(EU)'s, and Lebanon's United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973. NATO wasn't used until United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 since it was vetoed by Turkey. If, however, you are referring to the NATO intervention in Libya, that was NATO agreeing to enforce a United Nations Security Council Resolution. It was never intended as a permanent expansion of the Alliance to embrace Libya nor to establish a NATO base in the country.
    3
  1247. 3
  1248. 3
  1249. 3
  1250. 3
  1251. 3
  1252. 3
  1253. 3
  1254. 3
  1255. 3
  1256. 3
  1257. 3
  1258. 3
  1259. 3
  1260. 3
  1261. 3
  1262. 3
  1263. 3
  1264. 3
  1265. 3
  1266. 3
  1267. 3
  1268. 3
  1269. 3
  1270. 3
  1271. 3
  1272. 3
  1273. 3
  1274. 3
  1275. 3
  1276. 3
  1277. 3
  1278. 3
  1279. 3
  1280. 3
  1281. 3
  1282. 3
  1283. 3
  1284. 3
  1285. 3
  1286. 3
  1287. 3
  1288. 3
  1289. 3
  1290. 3
  1291. 3
  1292. 3
  1293. 3
  1294. 3
  1295. 3
  1296. 3
  1297. 3
  1298. 3
  1299. 3
  1300. 3
  1301. 3
  1302.  @jasonm949  >How many countries has the US invaded vs Germany? >Afghanistan Osama Bin Laden's group executed multiple strikes inside the US. >Libya NATO STOPPED the bloody civil war in Libya. Putin STARTED the bloody war in Ukraine. On 16 August 2003, Libya formally admitted responsibility for Pan Am Flight 103 (Lockabie bombing) in a letter presented to the president of the United Nations Security Council. "On 10 March 2011, France was the first country in the world to recognise the National Transitional Council as the legitimate government of Libya". United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 was adopted by the United Nations Security Council on 17 March 2011 in response to the First Libyan Civil War. The Security Council resolution was proposed by France, Lebanon, and the United Kingdom. The US supported France's, Lebanon's, and the United Kingdom's United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973. Muammar Gaddafi played stupid games and win stupid prizes. >Iraq Iraq invaded Kuwait. Iraq STARTED the bloody war in Kuwait. Iraq's top oil exports countries from Jan to Jun 2020 1st, China! 29 million tonnes <---- LOL 2nd, India, 23 million tonnes 3rd, EU, 8 million tonnes 4th, South Korea, 6 million tonnes 5th, Turkey, 4 million tonnes with an upwards trend 5th, USA, 4 million tonnes with a downwards trend Report: Saudi Arabia Presses U.S. on Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Date: January 19, 1992 <---- note the 1992 year. From AP NEWS NEW YORK (AP) _ Saudi Arabia is pressuring the Bush administration to secretly arm and give intelligence to Iraqi opposition forces so they can work to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a newspaper reported Sunday. The Saudis want the United States to give arms and intelligence to Kurdish rebels in north Iraq, Shiite Muslim fighters in the south and Sunni Muslim opposition forces in central Iraq, the Times said, quoting U.S. and allied officials it didn’t name.
    3
  1303. 3
  1304. 3
  1305. 3
  1306. 3
  1307. 3
  1308. 3
  1309. 3
  1310. 3
  1311. 3
  1312. 3
  1313. 3
  1314. 3
  1315. 3
  1316. 3
  1317. 3
  1318. 3
  1319. 3
  1320.  @riteshgoel5750  > Iraq Afganistan Syria Libya That's a false equivalence. Unlike Russia, the US did NOT assimilate Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, Bosnia, Kosovo, Iran, Kuwait, and Yemen into US federal structure. >Afghanistan Osama Bin Laden >Libya NATO STOPPED the bloody civil war in Libya. Putin STARTED the bloody war in Ukraine. On 16 August 2003, Libya formally admitted responsibility for Pan Am Flight 103 (Lockabie bombing) in a letter presented to the president of the United Nations Security Council. "On 10 March 2011, France was the first country in the world to recognise the National Transitional Council as the legitimate government of Libya". United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 was adopted by the United Nations Security Council on 17 March 2011 in response to the First Libyan Civil War. The Security Council resolution was proposed by France, Lebanon, and the United Kingdom. Muammar Gaddafi played stupid games and win stupid prizes. >Iraq Iraq invaded Kuwait. Iraq STARTED the bloody war in Kuwait. Iraq's top oil exports countries from Jan to Jun 2020 1st, China! 29 million tonnes <---- LOL 2nd, India, 23 million tonnes 3rd, EU, 8 million tonnes 4th, South Korea, 6 million tonnes 5th, Turkey, 4 million tonnes with an upwards trend 5th, USA, 4 million tonnes with a downwards trend Report: Saudi Arabia Presses U.S. on Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Date: January 19, 1992 From AP NEWS NEW YORK (AP) _ Saudi Arabia is pressuring the Bush administration to secretly arm and give intelligence to Iraqi opposition forces so they can work to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a newspaper reported Sunday. The Saudis want the United States to give arms and intelligence to Kurdish rebels in north Iraq, Shiite Muslim fighters in the south and Sunni Muslim opposition forces in central Iraq, the Times said, quoting U.S. and allied officials it didn’t name.
    3
  1321. 3
  1322. 3
  1323. 3
  1324. 3
  1325. 3
  1326. 3
  1327. 3
  1328. 3
  1329. 3
  1330. 3
  1331. 3
  1332. 3
  1333. 3
  1334. 3
  1335. 3
  1336. 3
  1337. 3
  1338. 3
  1339. 3
  1340. 3
  1341. 3
  1342. 3
  1343. 3
  1344. 3
  1345. 3
  1346. 3
  1347.  @vaibhav07  >Nato also made a commitment to not expand towards eastern Europe That's a false narrative. Myth 1: NATO promised Russia it would not expand after the Cold War Fact: Such an agreement was never made. NATO’s door has been open to new members since it was founded in 1949 – and that has never changed. This “Open Door Policy” is enshrined in Article 10 of NATO’s founding treaty, which says “any other European State in a position to further the principles of this Treaty and to contribute to the security of the North Atlantic” can apply for membership. Decisions on membership are taken by consensus among all Allies. No treaty signed by the United States, Europe and Russia included provisions on NATO membership. The idea of NATO expansion beyond a united Germany was not on the agenda in 1989, particularly as the Warsaw Pact still existed. This was confirmed by Mikhail Gorbachev in an interview in 2014: "The topic of 'NATO expansion' was not discussed at all, and it wasn't brought up in those years. I say this with full responsibility. Not a single Eastern European country raised the issue, not even after the Warsaw Pact ceased to exist in 1991. Western leaders didn't bring it up, either." Declassified White House transcripts also reveal that, in 1997, Bill Clinton consistently refused Boris Yeltsin's offer of a 'gentlemen's agreement' that no former Soviet Republics would enter NATO: "I can't make commitments on behalf of NATO, and I'm not going to be in the position myself of vetoing NATO expansion with respect to any country, much less letting you or anyone else do so…NATO operates by consensus."
    3
  1348. 3
  1349. 3
  1350. 3
  1351. 3
  1352. 3
  1353. 3
  1354. 3
  1355. 3
  1356. 3
  1357. 3
  1358. 3
  1359. 3
  1360. 3
  1361. 3
  1362. 3
  1363. 3
  1364. 3
  1365. 3
  1366. 3
  1367. 3
  1368. 3
  1369. 3
  1370. 3
  1371. 3
  1372. 3
  1373. 3
  1374. 3
  1375. 3
  1376. 3
  1377. 3
  1378. 3
  1379. 3
  1380. 3
  1381. 3
  1382. 3
  1383. In the mid-2000s, Colombo (the commercial capital of Sri Lanka) agreed to let Beijing build a new port from scratch in the town of Hambantota, in the south of the island. It wasn’t yet thought of as part of a new Silk Road -- that programme was conceptualizsed by Xi Jinping in 2012 -- but all the ingredients were there. "Chinese funds and engineers are mobilised to build infrastructure outside China, as part of a partnership that was meant to be win-win: this is the very definition of the rationale of the Silk Road," said Jean-François Dufour, economist and director of DCA China-Analysis. The Chinese president integrated the Sri Lankan project into his Silk Road initiative in 2013. But in 2015, financial clouds began gathering over the future of Hambantota’s port, which cost $1.1 billion. Sri Lanka was crumbling under the debt, and was unable to repay the more than $8 billion in loans it had taken from China for several infrastructure projects in the country. Furious, Beijing turned up the heat and threatened to cut off financial support to the island nation if it didn’t quickly find a solution. In December, 2017, after two years of negotiations, Colombo finally agreed to turn over the port to China for 99 years in exchange for the cancellation of its debt. The concession was humiliating for Sri Lanka, while "the opponents of China, like India, painted the entire operation as a deliberate plan to acquire strategic positions in the region," Dufour said. China was suspected of intentionally strangling Colombo with loans at a 6 percent interest rate, which was much higher than the other lenders - such as the World Bank – from which Colombo had previously borrowed.
    3
  1384. 3
  1385. 3
  1386. 3
  1387. 3
  1388. 3
  1389. 3
  1390. 3
  1391. 3
  1392.  @wedjongkwowe4679  Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country".[8] You're a hypocrite.
    3
  1393. 3
  1394. 3
  1395. 3
  1396. 3
  1397. 3
  1398. 3
  1399. 3
  1400. 3
  1401. 3
  1402. 3
  1403. 3
  1404. 3
  1405. 3
  1406. 3
  1407. 3
  1408. 3
  1409. 3
  1410. 3
  1411. 3
  1412. 3
  1413. 3
  1414. 3
  1415. 3
  1416. 3
  1417. 3
  1418. 3
  1419. 3
  1420. 3
  1421. 3
  1422. 3
  1423. 3
  1424. 3
  1425. 3
  1426. 3
  1427. 3
  1428. 3
  1429. It's a lesson Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum's security assurances are useless. Feelings are useless, firepower is real. For Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum context, Russia, the US, and the UK confirmed their Ukraine becoming parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and effectively abandoning their nuclear arsenal to Russia and that they would: 1. Respect Ukrainian independence and sovereignty in the existing borders. 2. Refrain from the threat or the use of force against Ukraine. 3. Refrain from using economic pressure on Ukraine to influence their politics. 4. Seek immediate Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine if they "should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used". 5. Refrain from the use of nuclear arms against Ukraine. 6. Consult with one another if questions arise regarding those commitments. China and France gave somewhat weaker individual assurances in separate documents. Russia has exited Budapest Memorandum. The US and UK are fulfilling points 4 and 6 in accordance with Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum. Budapest Memorandum's security assurances are weaker than NATO's Article V and EU's Article 42.7. ------- Before Euromaidan, Russia, however, has successfully used political and economic leverage to dissuade Ukraine from signing the E.U. deal. In the months prior to the Vilnius summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a trade war with Kiev, blocking nearly all imports from Ukraine and cutting energy supplies to the country. In turn, this reduced Ukrainian exports by 25 percent and shrank the economy by 1.5 percent. Russia started a series of events that lead to Euromaidan.
    3
  1430. 3
  1431. 3
  1432. 3
  1433. 3
  1434.  @alchemist7412  India imports Australian barley due to the trade war between Australia and China. In Feb 2022, India has to drop tariffs for Australian lentils (Masoor) with zero tariffs from 11% in 2020 and 33% in 2017. India is supporting Australia's trade war against China. It's in India's own interest to gain useful allies against China. From April 2022, Australia and India to sign a $12 billion free trade agreement. India is effectively restoring some Commonwealth preferential trade components with another Commonwealth member. Tariffs will be eliminated on more than 85 percent of Australian goods exports to India, valued at more than $12.6 billion a year, rising to almost 91 percent over 10 years. Australian exports that will benefit include barley, sheep meat, wine, and rock lobster. Nationally, coal will be a big winner as around a quarter of total Indian imports of coal come from Australia. Remember, Brazil and Portugal are the major powers of the Lusophone Commonwealth. Lusophone Commonwealth's integration has progressed deeper than the CANZUK initiative e.g. Lusophone Citizenship, cooperation protocol in defense i.e. Brazil aims for the increased interoperability of the armed forces of Angola, Brazil, Cape Verde, Equatorial Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Mozambique, Portugal, São Tomé and Príncipe, and Timor-Leste. The relationship between the rising power of Brazil and the smaller Portugal mirrors the relationship between the larger USA and the smaller UK. Brazil can locally manufacture Gripen E as Brazilian F-39. Brazil has placed higher importance on Lusophone Commonwealth over BRICS. Russia and China are NOT the only countries reverting back to their historical empires.
    3
  1435. 3
  1436. 3
  1437. 3
  1438. 3
  1439. 3
  1440. 3
  1441. 3
  1442. 3
  1443. 3
  1444. 3
  1445. 3
  1446. 3
  1447. 3
  1448. 3
  1449. 3
  1450. 3
  1451. 3
  1452. 3
  1453. 3
  1454. 3
  1455. 3
  1456. 3
  1457. 3
  1458. 3
  1459. 3
  1460. 3
  1461. 3
  1462. 3
  1463. 3
  1464. 3
  1465. 3
  1466.  @warheadvun5485  >the USA is nothing but a country of immigrant where the indigenous natives have been reduced to a minority Russian_conquest_of_Central_Asia 1718-1847: Gaining control of the Kazakh Steppe Fall of the Kazakh Khanate (1847) 1839: Failed attack on Khiva. See Khivan campaign of 1839. 1847–1853: The Syr Darya line 1847–1864: Down the eastern side 1864–1868: Kokand and Bukhara subdued, Russian conquest of Bukhara 1875–1876: Liquidation of the Kokand Khanate 1873: The conquest of Khiva 1879–1885: Turkmenistan: Geok Tepe, Merv and Panjdeh 1879: Lomakin's defeat at Geok Tepe 1884: The annexation of Merv 1885: Expansion stopped at Panjdeh 1872–1895: The Eastern Mountains 1867–1877: Yakub Beg 1871–1883: temporary occupation of Kulja 1893: Pamirs occupied Results speak themselves with Imperial Russia/Russian Federation having the largest land area in the world! -------------------- Grand Duchy of Moscow (1263–1547) 1368–1372 Lithuanian-Muscovite War 1376 Muscovite-Volga Bulgars war 1467–1469 Qasim War 1471 Battle of Shelon 1480 Great stand on the Ugra river 1478 Siege of Kazan 1492–1494 First Muscovite-Lithuanian War 1495–1497 Russo-Swedish War 1500–1503 Second Muscovite-Lithuanian War 1505–1507 Russo-Kazan War 1507–1508 Third Muscovite-Lithuanian War 1512–1522 Fourth Muscovite-Lithuanian War 1534–1537 Fifth Muscovite-Lithuanian War Tsardom of Russia (1547–1721) 1552 Siege of Kazan 1552–1556 Tatar Rebellion 1554–1557 Ivan the Terrible’s Swedish War 1556 Russian conquest of Astrakhan 1558–1583 Livonian War 1568–1570 Astrakhan Expedition 1570–1572 Ivan the Terrible’s Crimean War 1580–1762 Russian conquest of Siberia 1590–1595 Boris Godunov’s Swedish War 1606–1607 Bolotnikov Rebellion 1610–1617 Ingrian War 1632–1634 Smolensk War 1651–1653 Alexis I’s Persian War 1652–1689 Sino–Russian border conflicts 1654–1667 First Northern War 1656–1658 Second Northern War 1670–1671 Razin’s Rebellion 1676–1681 Feodor III’s Turkish War 1683–1700 Great Turkish War 1700–1721 Great Northern War 1704–1711 Third Bashkir Rebellion 1707–1708 Bulavin Rebellion 1717 Peter the Great’s Khivan War 1717–1847 Kazakh-Russian conflicts Russian Empire (1721–1917) 1722–1723 Persian Expedition of Peter the Great 1733–1738 War of the Polish Succession Rhineland 1735–1739 Russo-Austro-Turkish War 1735–1740 Fourth Bashkir Rebellion 1740–1748 War of the Austrian Succession 1756–1763 Seven Years' War 1768–1769 Koliivshchyna Rebellion 1768–1772 War of the Bar Confederation 1768–1774 Catherine the Great’s First Turkish War 1773–1775 Pugachev's Rebellion 1787–1792 Catherine the Great’s Second Turkish War 1788–1790 Catherine the Great’s Swedish War 1792 Catherine the Great’s Polish War, Second Partition of Poland 1794 Kościuszko Uprising, Third Partition of Poland 1796 Persian Expedition of Catherine the Great 1804–1813 Alexander I’s Persian War 1806–1812 Alexander I’s Turkish War 1808–1809 Finnish War 1817–1864 Caucasian War 1826–1828 Nicholas I’s Persian War 1828–1829 Nicholas I’s Turkish War 1830–1831 November uprising, crushed Polish uprising. 1839–1841 Second Turko-Egyptian War 1839–1895 Russian conquest of Central Asia 1863–1864 January uprising, crushed Polish, Lithuanian and Ukrainian insurgents uprising. 1899–1901 Boxer Rebellion, Results speak themselves with Imperial Russia/Russian Federation having the largest land area in the world! Soviet Union (1922–1991) 1924 August Uprising, Consolidation of Soviet rule in Georgian SSR 1924 Tatarbunary Uprising, Crushing of the Soviet-inspired rebellion. 1925–1926 Urtatagai conflict, 1929 Sino-Soviet conflict, USSR defeats China 1929 Red Army intervention in Afghanistan, USSR defeated. 1930 Red Army intervention in Afghanistan (1930), USSR defeats Basmachi. 1932–1941 Soviet–Japanese border conflicts, USSR defeats Imperial Japan. 1936–1939 Spanish Civil War, USSR-backed proxy has been defeated. 1937 Islamic Rebellion in Xinjiang, USSR's backed proxy defeats China. 1939 Invasion of Poland (Part of World War II), triggering WW2. Division of Polish territory between Third Reich, Soviet Union and Slovakia 1939–1940 Winter War (Part of World War II), USSR defeats Finland. 1940 Occupation of the Baltic states(Part of World War II), Occupation of the Baltic states by the Red Army 1940 Soviet occupation of Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina(Part of World War II), Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina annexed to the USSR, creation of the Moldovan SSR. 1944–1956 Guerrilla war in the Baltic states, USSR defeats Ukrainian Insurgent Army 1945 Soviet–Japanese War(Part of World War II), USSR defeats Imperial Japan. Karafuto Prefecture is annexed by the Soviet Union and incorporated into Sakhalin Oblast. Kuril Islands annexed to the Soviet Union 1953 East German Uprising, Soviet Union crushed East German demonstrators. 1968 Invasion of Czechoslovakia, Soviet military presence in Czechoslovakia until 1991. 1969 Zhenbao Island Incidentm, USSR defeats China. 1974–1991 Eritrean War of Independence, USSR's proxy defeated. 1975–1991 Angolan Civil War, Independence of Namibia 1977–1978 Ethio-Somali War. Somalia broke all ties with Soviet Union. 1979–1989 Soviet–Afghan War, Failed Soviet attempt to quell Afghan Mujahedeen insurgency Russian Federation (1991-present) 1991–1993 Georgian Civil War, Zviadist revolt crushed. 1991–1993 War in Abkhazia, Russian-backed Abkhazia gained de facto independence from Georgia. 1992 Transnistria War, Russian- Transnistria gained de facto independence from Moldova. 1992 East Prigorodny Conflict, Expulsion of ethnic Ingush from Prigorodny by Ossetian militia 2008 Russo-Georgian War, Expansion of Russain backed Abkhazia and South Ossetia at the expense of Georgia. 2014–present Russo-Ukrainian War, Russian annexation of Crimea 2018–present Central African Republic Civil War, Ongoing. Try again.
    3
  1467. 3
  1468. 3
  1469. 3
  1470. 3
  1471. 3
  1472. 3
  1473. 3
  1474. 3
  1475. 3
  1476. 3
  1477. 3
  1478. 3
  1479. 3
  1480. 3
  1481. 3
  1482. 3
  1483. 3
  1484. 3
  1485. 3
  1486. 3
  1487. 3
  1488. 3
  1489. 3
  1490. 3
  1491. 3
  1492. 3
  1493.  @matthewspry4217  Self-interest is a factor e.g. "level playing field" for who? German interest? Countries like Australia, Canada, the US, China, and Russia are not energy poor. Germany was imposing pro-Russian natural gas via EU proxy at the expense of coal was stupid. UK's Lithium mines are a reasonable alternative when there is a German-led (via EU proxy) push for wreaking other countries' coal. Australia's free trade deal with the EU has reached an impasse due to the EU's "climate change" definition and market access for Australian agricultural products in the EU. Australia is inching closer to walking away from negotiations with the EU as talks on a free trade agreement reach an impasse. Australia currently has a trade deficit with Europe of more than $26.68 billion USD annually. ----------------- Australia is already at Net Zero. Australian forests absorb 940 million tonnes of carbon dioxide per annum compared to our domestic and industrial emissions of 417 million tonnes. Add to that the absorption of carbon dioxide in continental Australia to the carbon dioxide adsorption of 2,500,000 square kilometers of continental shelf waters and Australia sequesters some five times as much carbon dioxide as it emits. Australia does more than its share of the heavy lifting for the global sequestration of carbon dioxide. Since Australia has a small population for a given land mass, Australia sequesters some five times as much carbon dioxide as it emits. EU's demand for "climate change" action on Australia is a joke.
    3
  1494. 3
  1495. 3
  1496. 3
  1497. 3
  1498. 3
  1499. 3
  1500. 3
  1501. 3
  1502. 3
  1503. 3
  1504. 3
  1505. 3
  1506. 3
  1507. 3
  1508. 3
  1509. 3
  1510. 3
  1511. 3
  1512. 3
  1513. 3
  1514. 3
  1515. 3
  1516. 3
  1517. 3
  1518. 3
  1519.  @ommsterlitz1805  Bullshit. ttps://www.reddit.com/r/F35Lightning/comments/8a66ta/out_of_the_shadows_rnlaf_experiences_with_the/ Out Of The Shadows: RNLAF experiences with the F-35A - Combat Aircraft Magazine May 2018 1. Dutch F-35 Block 3F, "F-35 sits somewhere in between the F-16 and F/A-18 when it comes to within visual range manoeuvring'". 2. Lightest empty weight F-16A MLU air-superority model needs to be clean (no weapons, no external tanks) to make visual range dogfight interesting against combat loaded F-35A Block 3F. 3. Dutch has acknowledge early F-35 Block builds being beaten by F-16s which is NOT applicable for F-35A Block 3F build. http://nettsteder.regjeringen.no/kampfly/2015/11/20/a-fly-f-35-erfaringer-fra-den-forste-uka/ More F-16 vs F-35 from Norwegian pilot. I quote Overall, flying the F-35 reminds me a bit of flying the F/A-18 Hornet, but with an important difference: It has been fitted with a turbo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNXhrYNv_xM NATO Frisian Flag - mass launch and recovery of Vipers, Typhoons, Gripens & Hornets Original source (non-English) http://suomenkuvalehti.fi/jutut/kotimaa/suomella-vahvat-ilmavoimat-mutta-kuinka-kauan/ Frisian Flag 2012 exercises in Holland, Finnish F-18Cs gets 100 kills and 6 loses against Eurofighter (Germany, UK), Polish new F-16 and older F-16 planes (Norway, Belgium) and Gripen (Swedish) Finland's F-18C has 16:1 kill ratio over Germany/UK's Eurofighter, Poland's F-16C Block 52+ and Norway/Belgium's F-16A MLU and Sweden's Gripen. Poland, Norway and Belgium has selected F-35A over losers in Frisian Flag 2012. ------------ F-35A Block 3F has 9G with 50 degrees angle of attack. For Refale http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/flight-test-dassault-rafale-rampant-rafale-334383/ The DFCS is a "g" demand system with +9.0g/29° angle of attack (AoA) limit in air-to-air mode and +5.5g/20° AoA limit in both of the two air-to-ground/heavy stores modes (ST1 and ST2) to cater for forward or aft centre of gravity For F-35 A, http://www.f-16.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=15013&start=210 Article copied beyond Aviation Week paywall. So it got stuck at 60 or 70 deg. alpha, and it was as happy as could be For reference, F-16 Vista with thrust vector control can nearly sustain 90 degress angle of attack. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dj8OJs6E3JM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RTWnFaQfHU F-35A's post-stall flay spin reversal maneuver with hover. Find Rafale's version. http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2009/07/i-flew-supersonic-barely-at-th/ F-35C has 300 degrees per second roll rate. F-35A roll rate: 300 deg/sec. Video proof. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qceZALofOcg&feature=youtu.be&t=1m15s http://theaviationist.com/2015/05/01/aileron-roll-in-t-346a/ According to most reports a Rafale features a maximum roll rate of 270 deg/s, the Eurofighter Typhoon is able of around 250 deg/s, the F/A-18E Super Hornet has a maximum roll rate of 120 deg/s whereas the F-16 can roll at 240 deg/s. Try again.
    3
  1520. 3
  1521. 3
  1522. 3
  1523. 3
  1524. 3
  1525. 3
  1526. 3
  1527. 3
  1528. 3
  1529. 3
  1530. 3
  1531. 3
  1532. 3
  1533. 3
  1534. 3
  1535. 3
  1536. 3
  1537. 3
  1538. 3
  1539. 3
  1540. 3
  1541. 3
  1542. 3
  1543. 3
  1544. 3
  1545. 3
  1546. 3
  1547. 3
  1548. 3
  1549. 3
  1550. 3
  1551. 3
  1552. 3
  1553. 3
  1554. 3
  1555. 3
  1556. 3
  1557. 3
  1558. 3
  1559. 3
  1560. 3
  1561.  @TjJay-ev6mx  Syria A Jewish wedding in Aleppo, Syria (Ottoman Empire), 1914. Ruins of the Central Synagogue of Aleppo after the 1947 Aleppo pogrom In 1947, rioters in Aleppo burned the city's Jewish quarter and killed 75 people.[191] As a result, nearly half of the Jewish population of Aleppo opted to leave the city,[5] initially to neighbouring Lebanon.[192] In 1948, there were approximately 30,000 Jews in Syria. In 1949, following defeat in the Arab–Israeli War, the CIA-backed March 1949 Syrian coup d'état installed Husni al-Za'im as the President of Syria. Za'im permitted the emigration of large numbers of Syrian Jews, and 5,000 left to Israel.[192] The subsequent Syrian governments placed severe restrictions on the Jewish community, including barring emigration.[192] In 1948, the government banned the sale of Jewish property and in 1953 all Jewish bank accounts were frozen. The Syrian secret police closely monitored the Jewish community. Over the following years, many Jews managed to escape, and the work of supporters, particularly Judy Feld Carr,[193] in smuggling Jews out of Syria, and bringing their plight to the attention of the world, raised awareness of their situation. Although the Syrian government attempted to stop Syrian Jews from exporting their assets, the American consulate in Damascus noted in 1950 that "the majority of Syrian Jews have managed to dispose of their property and to emigrate to Lebanon, Italy, and Israel".[194][195] In November 1954, the Syrian government temporarily lifted its ban on Jewish emigration.[196] The various restrictions that the Syrian government placed on the Jewish population were severe. Jews were legally barred from working for the government or for banks, obtaining driver's licenses, having telephones in their homes or business premises, or purchasing property. In March 1964, the Syrian government issued a decree prohibiting Jews from traveling more than three miles from the limits of their hometowns.[197] In 1967, in the aftermath of the Six-Day War, antisemitic riots broke out in Damascus and Aleppo. Jews were allowed to leave their homes only for few hours daily. Many Jews found it impossible to pursue their business ventures because the larger community was boycotting their products. In 1970, Israel launched Operation Blanket, a covert military and intelligence operation to evacuate Syrian Jews, managing to bring a few dozen young Jews to Israel.[198] Clandestine Jewish emigration continued, as Jews attempted to sneak across the borders into Lebanon or Turkey, often with the help of smugglers, and make contact with Israeli agents or local Jewish communities. In 1972, demonstrations were held by 1,000 Syrian Jews in Damascus, after four Jewish women were killed as they attempted to flee Syria. The protest surprised Syrian authorities, who closely monitored Jewish community, eavesdropped on their telephone conversations, and tampered with their mail.[198] Following the Madrid Conference of 1991, the United States put pressure on the Syrian government to ease its restrictions on Jews, and during Passover in 1992, the government of Syria began granting exit visas to Jews on condition that they did not emigrate to Israel. At that time, the country had several thousand Jews. The majority left for the United States—most to join the large Syrian Jewish community in South Brooklyn, New York—although some went to France and Turkey, and 1,262 Syrian Jews who wanted to immigrate to Israel were brought there in a two-year covert operation.[199] In 2004, the Syrian government attempted to establish better relations with its emigrants, and a delegation of a dozen Jews of Syrian origin visited Syria in the spring of that year.[199] As of December 2014, only 17 Jews remain in Syria, according to Rabbi Avraham Hamra; nine men and eight women, all over 60 years of age.[200] ------------- Your argument is bullshit.
    3
  1562. 3
  1563. 3
  1564. 3
  1565. 3
  1566. 3
  1567. 3
  1568. 3
  1569. 3
  1570.  @thedj3319  Wrong again. From http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/document.php?id=cqresrre1940110100 Growth of Government Control of Business In the meantime, the mechanisms for government control of the economic system had been extended and strengthened. During the banking crisis of 1932, almost all of Germany's large private banks were brought under the control of the Reichsbank. This was even more important in Germany than it would have been elsewhere, because the banks handled a large part of business investment as well as commercial loans, and consequently were in a position of very great influence in German industry. In this same period, the percentage of German national income which went to the state in one form of taxes or another was also increased, adding to the direct importance of the state in the economic life of the nation. The result, according to Stolper, was that: When it came to its end, the democratic Republic left as a heritage to the National Socialist state an economic system that corresponded rather closely to a complete system of “State Socialism.” The state was, so to speak, in command of the whole blood circulation as represented in a modern economic system by the banking mechanism. The state held in its grip the most important “commanding heights” over business, such as the transportation system, the power supply, and the influence over cartel prices. The state had, furthermore, taken over vital functions of the trade unions and the employers' organizations. … The road to the totalitarian state had teen well laid out. The National Socialist government needed but to utilize for its own aims the instruments of state power forged by its predecessors.3 This observation is confirmed by Fritz Ermarth, who writes, “When the National Socialists seized power in Germany early in 1938, the German national economy was under Government control to a wider extent than ever before during peacetime.”4 In addition to the railroads, telegraph and telephone lines, which had long been state-owned, the Reich had invested government funds directly in the German steel cartel, in a moving picture company, in numerous construction enterprises, and in other “private” businesses. -------- Try again.
    3
  1571. 3
  1572. 3
  1573. 3
  1574. 3
  1575. 3
  1576. 3
  1577. 3
  1578. 3
  1579. 3
  1580. 3
  1581. 3
  1582. 3
  1583. 3
  1584. 3
  1585. 3
  1586. 3
  1587. 3
  1588. 3
  1589. 3
  1590. 3
  1591. 3
  1592. 3
  1593. 3
  1594. 3
  1595. 3
  1596. 3
  1597. 3
  1598. 3
  1599. 3
  1600. 3
  1601. 3
  1602. 3
  1603. 3
  1604. 3
  1605. 3
  1606. 3
  1607. 3
  1608. 3
  1609. 3
  1610. 3
  1611. 3
  1612. 3
  1613. 3
  1614. 3
  1615. 3
  1616. 3
  1617. 3
  1618. 3
  1619. 3
  1620. 3
  1621. 3
  1622. 3
  1623. 3
  1624. 3
  1625. 3
  1626. 3
  1627. 3
  1628. 3
  1629.  @aesop8694  There was no mutual military assistance treaty between Czechoslovakia and UK. After the Munich agreement, UK signed mutual military assistance between the nations if either was attacked by some "European country" After the German occupation of Prague in March 1939 in violation of the Munich agreement, the Chamberlain government in Britain sought Soviet and French support for a Peace Front. The goal was to deter further German aggression by guaranteeing the independence of Poland and Romania. However, Stalin refused to pledge Soviet support for the guarantees unless Britain and France first concluded a military alliance with the Soviet Union. Although the British cabinet decided to seek such an alliance, the western negotiators in Moscow in August 1939 lacked urgency. The talks were conducted poorly and slowly by diplomats with little authority, such as William Strang, an assistant under-secretary. Stalin also insisted on British and French guarantees to Finland, the Baltic states, Poland and Romania against indirect German aggression. Those countries, however, became fearful that Moscow wanted to control them. Although Hitler was escalating threats against Poland, which refused to allow Soviet troops to cross its borders for fear that they would never leave. Historian Michael Jabara Carley argues that the British were too committed to anticommunism to trust Stalin. Meanwhile, both Great Britain and USSR were separately involved into secret negotiations with Germany. Eventually Stalin was attracted to a much better deal by Hitler, the control of most of Eastern Europe, and decided to sign the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact .
    3
  1630. 3
  1631. 3
  1632. 3
  1633. 3
  1634. 3
  1635. 3
  1636. 3
  1637. 3
  1638. 3
  1639. 3
  1640. 3
  1641. 3
  1642. 3
  1643. 3
  1644. 3
  1645. 3
  1646. 3
  1647. 3
  1648. 3
  1649. 3
  1650. 3
  1651. 3
  1652. 3
  1653. 3
  1654. In the mid-2000s, Colombo (the commercial capital of Sri Lanka) agreed to let Beijing build a new port from scratch in the town of Hambantota, in the south of the island. It wasn’t yet thought of as part of a new Silk Road -- that programme was conceptualizsed by Xi Jinping in 2012 -- but all the ingredients were there. "Chinese funds and engineers are mobilised to build infrastructure outside China, as part of a partnership that was meant to be win-win: this is the very definition of the rationale of the Silk Road," said Jean-François Dufour, economist and director of DCA China-Analysis. The Chinese president integrated the Sri Lankan project into his Silk Road initiative in 2013. But in 2015, financial clouds began gathering over the future of Hambantota’s port, which cost $1.1 billion. Sri Lanka was crumbling under the debt, and was unable to repay the more than $8 billion in loans it had taken from China for several infrastructure projects in the country. Furious, Beijing turned up the heat and threatened to cut off financial support to the island nation if it didn’t quickly find a solution. In December, 2017, after two years of negotiations, Colombo finally agreed to turn over the port to China for 99 years in exchange for the cancellation of its debt. The concession was humiliating for Sri Lanka, while "the opponents of China, like India, painted the entire operation as a deliberate plan to acquire strategic positions in the region," Dufour said. China was suspected of intentionally strangling Colombo with loans at a 6 percent interest rate, which was much higher than the other lenders - such as the World Bank – from which Colombo had previously borrowed.
    3
  1655. 3
  1656. 3
  1657. 3
  1658. 3
  1659. 3
  1660. 3
  1661.  @zava5025  Hitler's socialism has favored the "Ayran race" group that benefited from direct mass stealing from the undesirable groups of people and it's enforced by a big interventionist nation-state government. Marxist socialism has favored the "worker class" group that benefited from direct mass stealing from the undesirable groups of people and it's enforced by a big interventionist nation-state government. All major Marxist socialism implementation does NOT transfer private property titles to benefactors. Marxist supports attempt to cast Hitler's socialism as rightwing when it's similar to the extreme left socialism. For post-WW2 Japan, MacArthur also executed land reform by shifting significant wealthy landlord's lands to the workers with private land title transfers. MacArthur = land reform transfers that included private land title transfers to the workers. From http://www.crosscurrents.hawaii.edu/content.aspx?lang=eng&site=japan&theme=work&subtheme=AGRIC&unit=JWORK098# Land Reform in Postwar Japan As part of the democratization of Japan after World War II, Japanese leaders and Occupation authorities worked together to carry out land reform. It is regarded as one of the most successful of the Occupation-era reforms, and has become the model for land reform in other countries. The purpose of land reform was to reduce the wide gap between absentee landlords who owned agricultural land but did not farm it themselves, and tenant farmers who rented the land in exchange for giving the landlord a high proportion of the crop. The land reform laws were intended to limit the amount of farmland one household could own to about the amount of land that one family could farm themselves, without outside labor. The government forced absentee landlords to sell all their land to the government. Farmers were allowed to own a small amount of farm land that they could rent out to others ( 2.5 acres or one hectare in most parts of Japan, and 10 acres or 4 hectares in Hokkaido), and had to sell any excess to the government. The government then sold this land, usually to the tenant who had been farming it. The result greatly improved the living conditions of farmers. Idealogical basis: A family's land ownership. The new world west has its own idealogy on land reform with family units and private ownership as its core idealogy. VS Marxist socialism = land reform transfer to the state, no private land title transfer to the workers.
    3
  1662. 3
  1663. 3
  1664. 3
  1665. 3
  1666. 3
  1667. 3
  1668. 3
  1669. 3
  1670. 3
  1671. 3
  1672. 3
  1673. 3
  1674. 3
  1675. 3
  1676. 3
  1677.  @roblockhart6104  FYI, the so-called "super maneuverability"'s thrust vector (improves tail related flight control functions) benefits low-speed nose pointing (relative to empty weight) which is countered by 360 degrees targeting and thrust vector enabled A2A missiles. Acceleration helps energy recovery after an instantaneous turn. F-16's tail and LERX design is not for Hornet's nose pointer/high sustain G minimum turn radius low-speed regime. F-16 Vista's thrust vector control enables F-16 to fight in nose pointer/high sustain G minimum turn radius low-speed regime. Original source (non-English) http://suomenkuvalehti.fi/jutut/kotimaa/suomella-vahvat-ilmavoimat-mutta-kuinka-kauan/ Frisian Flag 2012 exercises in Holland, Finnish F-18Cs gets 100 kills and 6 loses against Eurofighter (Germany, UK), Polish new F-16 and older F-16 planes (Norway, Belgium) and Gripen (Swedish) Finland's F-18C has a 16:1 kill ratio over Germany/UK's Eurofighter, Poland's F-16C Block 52+ and Norway/Belgium's F-16A MLU, and Sweden's Gripen. F-16's angle of attack is limited to about 26 degrees. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3b-b762QRY Super Hornet's high angle of attack with minimum turn radius advantage holding its own against F-15's high energy turn rate advantage dogfight example. http://theaviationist.com/2016/03/01/heres-what-ive-learned-so-far-dogfighting-in-the-f-35-a-jsf-pilot-first-hand-account/ Norwegian F-35 Pilot Counters David Axe's Controversial Dogfighting’ Report. Date: 2016, before December 2017 F-35A Block 3F. Well according to a Norwegian pilot the Jet handles better in a dogfight than the F-16 in some respects. He said that the F-35 can pull its nose around and keep a target in its sights better than the F-16 can. He said it's easier to be aggressive with the F-35. The F-35 which lost to the F-16 was a very early built F-35, one of the first and the idea of the test was to explore the F-35's ability to maneuver at high AOA. The test exposed areas of improvement which were needed, the test pilot said that the jet had the performance there but it was limited by the software at the time, and by the sounds of it the software has been improved because many of the weak areas found during testing appear now to be some of its greatest areas Fighters such as F-22A combine F-15C and Hornet-style dogfighting capabilities.
    3
  1678. 3
  1679. 3
  1680. 3
  1681. 3
  1682. 3
  1683. 3
  1684. 3
  1685. 3
  1686. 3
  1687. 3
  1688. 3
  1689. 3
  1690. 3
  1691. 3
  1692. 3
  1693. 3
  1694.  @JohnGeometresMaximos  Report: Saudi Arabia Presses U.S. on Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Date: January 19, 1992 From AP NEWS NEW YORK (AP) _ Saudi Arabia is pressuring the Bush administration to secretly arm and give intelligence to Iraqi opposition forces so they can work to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a newspaper reported Sunday. The Saudis want the United States to give arms and intelligence to Kurdish rebels in north Iraq, Shiite Muslim fighters in the south and Sunni Muslim opposition forces in central Iraq, the Times said, quoting U.S. and allied officials it didn’t name. ------ Date: December 2005 Dutch dealer gets 15 years for chemical sales to Saddam. A Dutch businessman was yesterday jailed for 15 years after a court in The Hague found him guilty of complicity in war crimes for selling chemicals to Iraq that Saddam Hussein's regime used in lethal gas attacks on Kurdish villages. ------ Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq Try again.
    3
  1695. 3
  1696. 3
  1697. 3
  1698. 3
  1699. 3
  1700. 3
  1701. 3
  1702. 3
  1703. Twenty Iraqi Kurds have taken legal action to expose French firms who supplied poison gas to Saddam Hussein in 1988. The plaintiffs were among the victims of a chemical weapon attack that killed 5,000 in the town of Halabja during the Iran-Iraq war. A Dutch businessman who sold Iraq chemicals used in the attack was ordered to pay 400,000 euros to some of the victims in April 2013. ----------- Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq
    3
  1704. 3
  1705. 3
  1706. 3
  1707. 3
  1708. 3
  1709. 3
  1710. 3
  1711. 3
  1712. 3
  1713. 3
  1714. 3
  1715. 3
  1716. 3
  1717. 3
  1718. 3
  1719. 3
  1720. 3
  1721. 3
  1722. 3
  1723. 3
  1724. 3
  1725. 3
  1726. 3
  1727. 3
  1728. 3
  1729. 3
  1730. 3
  1731. 3
  1732. 3
  1733. 3
  1734. 3
  1735. 3
  1736. 3
  1737. 3
  1738. 3
  1739. 3
  1740. 3
  1741. 3
  1742. 3
  1743. 3
  1744. 3
  1745. 3
  1746. 3
  1747. 3
  1748. 3
  1749. 3
  1750. 3
  1751. 3
  1752. 3
  1753. 3
  1754. 3
  1755. 3
  1756. 3
  1757.  @matejtanko5117  Non-NATO Finland has Israeli design strike weapons with a 400 km range. Finland has PTSD against Russia. Perhaps Finland should buy Israel's Popeye Turbo SLCM with a 1500 km range. As long Russia sells missile tech to Israel's opponents, Israel will keep selling its missile tech to Eastern European countries. Unlike in 1956, Israel is a nuclear-armed state. Note the existence of independent nuclear weapons from US allies such as the UK, France, and Israel. The trigger is the 1956 Suez Canal crisis when the Soviets have threaten to nuke Britain, France, and Israel without US nuclear weapons coverage. Russian-dominated USSR's threaten to nuke non-nuclear states and the withdrawal of US nuclear weapons coverage have made the argument for independent nuclear weapons armed US allies! The Falklands War reveals the US will NOT defend UK's territorial integrity. The US will only defend its own and common interest with Saudi and Kuwaiti oil. France and UK also have a common interest in Saudi and Kuwaiti oil. Report: Saudi Arabia Presses U.S. on Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Date: January 19, 1992 From AP NEWS NEW YORK (AP) _ Saudi Arabia is pressuring the Bush administration to secretly arm and give intelligence to Iraqi opposition forces so they can work to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a newspaper reported Sunday. The Saudis want the United States to give arms and intelligence to Kurdish rebels in north Iraq, Shiite Muslim fighters in the south and Sunni Muslim opposition forces in central Iraq, the Times said, quoting U.S. and allied officials it didn’t name.
    3
  1758. 3
  1759. 3
  1760. 3
  1761.  @mechatronica8417  CCP is indeed hypocrites. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    3
  1762. 3
  1763. 3
  1764. 3
  1765. 3
  1766. 3
  1767. 3
  1768. 3
  1769. 3
  1770. 3
  1771. 3
  1772. 3
  1773. 3
  1774. 3
  1775. 3
  1776. 3
  1777. 3
  1778. 3
  1779. 3
  1780. 3
  1781. 3
  1782. 3
  1783. 3
  1784. 3
  1785. 3
  1786. 3
  1787. 3
  1788.  @robertmarmaduke9721  False narrative By the 16th century, increasing numbers of Chinese fishermen, traders and pirates were visiting the southwestern part of the island. When the Dutch arrived in 1623, they found about 1,500 Chinese visitors and residents. The Dutch East India Company (VOC) came to the area in search of an Asian trade and military base. Defeated by the Portuguese at the Battle of Macau in 1622, they attempted to occupy Penghu, but were driven off by the Ming authorities. They then built Fort Zeelandia on the islet of Tayowan off the southwest coast of Taiwan. (The site is now part of the main island, in modern Anping, Tainan.) On the adjacent mainland, they built a smaller brick fort, Fort Provintia.[22] Local aboriginals called the area Pakan[23] and on some old maps the island of Taiwan is named Pakan.[24] In 1626, the Spanish Empire, viewing the Dutch presence on Taiwan as a threat to their colony in the Philippines, established a settlement at Santísima Trinidad on the northeast coast of Taiwan (modern Keelung), building Fort San Salvador. They also built Fort Santo Domingo in the northwest (modern Tamsui) in 1629, but had abandoned it by 1638. The small colony was plagued by disease and a hostile local population, and received little support from Manila.[25] The Dutch Governor Pieter Nuyts got entangled in a dispute with the Japanese Hamada Yahei. The Dutch were defeated at the Battle of Liaoluo Bay by the Chinese Zheng Zhilong in 1633. The Dutch set out to turn Taiwan into a Dutch colony.[11] The first order of business was to punish villages that had violently opposed the Dutch and unite the aborigines in allegiance with the VOC. The first punitive expedition was against the villages of Baccloan and Mattauw, north of Saccam near Tayowan. The Mattauw campaign had been easier than expected and the tribe submitted after having their village razed by fire. The campaign also served as a threat to other villages from Tirossen (modern Chiayi) to Lonkjiaow (Hengchun). The 1636 punitive attack on Lamay Island in response to the killing of the shipwrecked crews of the Beverwijck and the Golden Lion ended ten years later with the entire aboriginal population of 1100 removed from the island including 327 Lamayans killed in a cave, having been trapped there by the Dutch and suffocated in the fumes and smoke pumped into the cave by the Dutch and their allied aborigines from Saccam, Soulang and Pangsoya.[26] The men were forced into slavery in Batavia (Java) and the women and children became servants and wives for the Dutch officers. The events on Lamay changed the course of Dutch rule to work closer with allied aborigines, though there remained plans to depopulate the outlying islands.[27] In 1642, the Dutch ejected the Spanish from the north of the island.[28][29] They then sought to establish control of the western plains between the new possessions and their base at Taoyuan. After a brief but destructive campaign in 1645, Pieter Boon was able to subdue the tribes in this area, including the Kingdom of Middag.[30][31] On the mainland, Manchu forces broke through Shanhai Pass in 1644 and rapidly overwhelmed the Ming dynasty. In 1661, a naval fleet led by the Ming loyalist Koxinga arrived in Taiwan to oust the Dutch from Zeelandia and establish a pro-Ming base in Taiwan.[36] Koxinga was born to Zheng Zhilong, a Chinese merchant and pirate, and Tagawa Matsu, a Japanese woman, in 1624 in Hirado, Nagasaki Prefecture, Japan. He was raised there until seven and moved to Quanzhou, in the Fujian province of China. In a family made wealthy from shipping and piracy, Koxinga inherited his father's trade networks, which stretched from Nagasaki to Macao. Following the Manchu advance on Fujian, Koxinga retreated from his stronghold in Amoy (Xiamen city) and besieged Taiwan in the hope of establishing a strategic base to marshal his troops to retake his base at Amoy. In 1662, following a nine-month siege, Koxinga captured the Dutch fortress Zeelandia and Taiwan became his base (see Kingdom of Tungning).[37] The Taiwanese Aboriginal tribes who were previously allied with the Dutch against the Chinese during the Guo Huaiyi Rebellion in 1652 turned against the Dutch during the Siege of Fort Zeelandia and defected to Koxinga's Chinese forces.[38] The Aboriginals (Formosans) of Sincan defected to Koxinga after he offered them amnesty. The Sincan Aboriginals then proceeded to work for the Chinese and behead Dutch people in executions. The frontier aboriginals in the mountains and plains also surrendered and defected to the Chinese on 17 May 1661, celebrating their freedom from compulsory education under the Dutch rule by hunting down Dutch people and beheading them and trashing their Christian school textbooks.[39] Koxinga died four months after the siege was over, there were speculations that he died in a sudden fit of madness when his officers refused to carry out his orders to execute his son Zheng Jing. Zheng Jing had an affair with his wet nurse and conceived a child with her.[40] Other accounts are more straightforward, attributing Koxinga's death to a case of malaria.[41][42] Following the death of Koxinga, his son Zheng Jing took over the Zheng regime, leading the remaining 7,000 Ming loyalist troops to Taiwan. In response to raids by Zheng Jing and in an effort to starve out the forces in Taiwan, the Qing decreed to relocate all of the southern coastal towns and ports that had been the targets of raids by the Zheng fleet and thus provided supplies for the resistance. This measure largely backfired, and between 1662 and 1664, six major waves of immigration occurred from these coastal towns to Taiwan, spurred by the severe hardships incurred from the Qing relocation policy. In a move to take advantage of this Qing misstep, Zheng Jing promoted immigration to Taiwan by promising free eastern land cultivation and ownership for peasants in exchange for compulsory military service by all males in case the island was in danger of a Qing invasion. ... From 1683, the Qing dynasty ruled part of the island as Taiwan Prefecture and in 1875 divided the island into two prefectures, north and south. In 1887, the island was declared as a separate Fokien-Taiwan Province. The Qing authorities tried to limit immigration to Taiwan and barred families from traveling to Taiwan to ensure the immigrants would return to their families and ancestral graves. Illegal immigration continued, but many of the men had few prospects in war-weary Fujian and thus married locally, resulting in the idiom "has Tangshan[a] father, no Tangshan mother" The Qing tried to protect aboriginal land claims, but also sought to turn them into tax-paying subjects. Chinese and tax-paying aborigines were barred from entering the wilderness which covered most of the island for the fear of raising the ire of the nontaxpaying, highland aborigines and inciting rebellion. A border was constructed along the western plain, built using pits and mounds of earth, called "earth cows", to discourage squatting. ----- In the 1600s, Imperial China didn't control Taiwan. Dutch Taiwan was a refugee Island for Ming loyalists against Qing (ruling Imperial China).
    3
  1789. 3
  1790. 3
  1791. 3
  1792. 3
  1793. 3
  1794. 3
  1795. 3
  1796. 3
  1797. 3
  1798. 3
  1799. 3
  1800. 3
  1801. 3
  1802. 3
  1803. 3
  1804. 3
  1805. 3
  1806. 3
  1807. 3
  1808. 3
  1809. 3
  1810. 3
  1811. 3
  1812. 3
  1813. 3
  1814. 3
  1815. 3
  1816. 3
  1817. 3
  1818. 3
  1819. 3
  1820. 3
  1821. 3
  1822. 3
  1823. 3
  1824. 3
  1825. 3
  1826. 3
  1827. 3
  1828. 3
  1829. 3
  1830. 3
  1831. ​ @jagd8085  Fact: The UK lost its British Empire. The British government does NOT govern British Empire's breakaways. UK's Sterling zone is gone and Imperial preference (custom union) is gone i.e. these are the price for the USA supporting UK's WW2 adventure. Nothing is free. This is like Russian Empire being reduced to the core Moscow oblast and a few surrounding oblasts. British Empire doesn't exist and there is no successor federation state. Biden's US rejected UK's USMCA membership attempt. The UK has to accept CPTPP conditions (economically dominated by Japan, Australia, and Canada). How the mighty have fallen. Blame Trump for the US exit from TPP and effectively created a preferential trade block for Japan and mostly Commonwealth members. Under the CPTPP trade zone, the UK will be treated like any other CPTPP member. Fact: Spain lost its Spanish Empire. The Spanish government does NOT govern Spanish Empire's breakaways. Spanish Empire doesn't exist and there is no successor federation state. As shown in the PIIGS situation, another economic power dominates the EU and it's not the US i.e. when Germany tells you to jump, you jump e.g. Greek's PIIGS solution. The PIIGS countries have to follow Germany's economic direction. Swedish Exit (Swexit) from the EU argument is against German dominance e.g. German driven green "even the playing field" policies. Unlike non-existing Western European Empires, the Russian Federation still has most of the Russian Empire's land territories.
    3
  1832. 3
  1833. 3
  1834. 3
  1835. 3
  1836. 3
  1837. 3
  1838. 3
  1839. 3
  1840. 3
  1841. 3
  1842. 3
  1843. 3
  1844. 3
  1845. 3
  1846. 3
  1847. 3
  1848. 3
  1849. 3
  1850. 3
  1851. 3
  1852. 3
  1853. 3
  1854. 3
  1855. 3
  1856. 3
  1857. 3
  1858. 3
  1859. 3
  1860. 3
  1861. 3
  1862. 3
  1863. 3
  1864. 3
  1865. 3
  1866. 3
  1867. 3
  1868. 3
  1869. 3
  1870. 3
  1871. 3
  1872. 3
  1873. 3
  1874. 3
  1875. 3
  1876.  @zsarimaxim692  The U.S. position on Taiwan’s international status is “undetermined,” in accordance with the outcome of the 1951-52 San Francisco Peace Treaty. In that treaty, Japan had formally ceded sovereignty over the island, but it was not decided to whom. Most countries at the 1951 Peace Conference argued that Taiwan’s status needed to be determined in due time, in accordance with the principle of self-determination enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations. Post-WW2, Taiwan and the Pescadores islands are not handed to China, and KMT is a foreign government in exile under the American occupation of Japanese Taiwan islands. In Taiwan, the KMT government was politically defeated by partly aboriginal Taiwanese Tsai Ing-wen Democratic Progressive Party. On the eve of the 1894 Sino-Japanese War, about 45 percent of the island was administered under the Manchus Qing administration (Imperial China) while the remaining was populated by Taiwanese aborigines. Imperialist Manchus Qing's Imperial China didn't fully control Taiwan. 1. KMT is overreaching its territorial claim since on the eve of the 1894 Sino-Japanese War, about 45 percent of the island was administered under the Manchus Qing administration (Imperial China) while the remaining land area was populated by Taiwanese aborigines. 2. KMT was militarily defeated by CCP. KMT rejected CCP and it has runaway to Formosa. 3. KMT was politically defeated by partly aboriginal Taiwanese Tsai Ing-wen Democratic Progressive Party.
    3
  1877.  @zsarimaxim692  1952 Treaty of Taipei's Article 2 refers to San Francisco Treaty. Article 2 It is recognized that under Article 2 of the Treaty of Peace with Japan signed at the city of San Francisco in the United States of America on September 8, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the San Francisco Treaty), Japan has renounced all right, title and claim to Taiwan (Formosa) and Penghu (the Pescadores) as well as the Spratly Islands and the Paracel Islands. Article 2 didn't confer the new owner for Taiwan. Article 3 is between the Government of the Republic of China and the Government of Japan, not with PRC. In Articles 2 and 5, the Treaty of Taipei makes direct references to the San Francisco Peace Treaty (SFPT), also known as the Japanese Peace Treaty, which was signed and ratified by most Allies with the government of Japan respectively in 1951 and 1952. The San Francisco Peace Treaty was signed on 8 September 1951 and ratified on 28 April 1952, the same date that the Treaty of Taipei was signed. The latter treaty entered into force on 5 August 1952 with the exchange of the instruments of ratification between Tokyo and Taipei. British officials did not consider Taiwan's sovereignty to be transferred to China by the SFPT; American officials recognized no such transfer in either treaty According to United Nations Treaty Series Volume 138, the Japanese plenipotentiary, Isao Kawada, acknowledged "The present Treaty (Treaty of Peace) shall, in respect of the Republic of China, be applicable to all the territories which are now, or which may hereafter be, under the control of its Government," which included Taiwan (Formosa), Penghu (the Pescadores) through the Exchange of Notes No. 1.[13] Regarding the effect of the Exchange of Notes No. 1, in 1964, Japanese Minister for Foreign Affairs Masayoshi Ōhira explained in the House of Councillors: "This note of exchange has nothing to do with the Republic of China's territorial sovereignty… The effect of this provision is under the prerequisite of the Republic of China's actual administration over these territories and clearly does not mean its Government has the territorial sovereignty over these territories. We used the word "control" to make such a connotation obvious."[14] You are wrong.
    3
  1878. 3
  1879. 3
  1880. 3
  1881. 3
  1882. 3
  1883. 3
  1884. 3
  1885. 3
  1886. 3
  1887. 3
  1888. 3
  1889. 3
  1890. 3
  1891. 3
  1892. 3
  1893. 3
  1894. 3
  1895. ​ @duniavirtual7112  The period of Indonesian occupation was marked by violence and brutality. A detailed statistical report prepared for the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor cited a minimum of 102,800 conflict-related deaths in the period between 1974 and 1999, including approximately 18,600 killings and 84,200 "excess" deaths from hunger and illness. Portuguese, Indonesian, and Catholic Church data estimated 200,000 deaths. The East Timorese guerrilla force (Forças Armadas da Libertação Nacional de Timor-Leste, Falintil) fought a campaign against the Indonesian forces from 1975 to 1998. The mess is Indonesia's NOT the west. ---- East Timor is a full member state of the Community of Portuguese Language Countries (CPLP), also known as the Lusophone Commonwealth, an international organisation and political association of Lusophone nations across four continents. In each of those nations, Portuguese is an official language. Brazil and Portugal are the major powers for Lusophone Commonwealth. Lusophone Commonwealth's Defense component, In 2016, CPLP revised its cooperation protocol in defense, affirming the organization in the promotion of peace and security. The 2017 Exercício Felino military exercise taking place in Academia Militar das Agulhas Negras, Resende, in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, aims for the increased interoperability of the armed forces of Angola, Brazil, Cape Verde, Equatorial Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Mozambique, Portugal, São Tomé and Príncipe, and Timor-Leste. The Parliamentary Assembly of Lusophony is the body that brings together the representations of all the Parliaments of the Member States, constituted on the basis of the respective electoral results of the legislative elections. Lusophone Citizenship Easing citizens' cross-border movement between the member states was proposed at the 2017 CPLP Summit.[30] This proposal by Portugal and Cape Verde to Brazil was thought by some to conflict with Europe's Schengen area. However, this free movement is based on a different model: as residence permits, associated with the recognition of academic degrees and professional qualification, and maintenance of social rights including pension systems. It would henceforth establish Lusophone citizenship. Brazil has a nuclear-powered submarine and Sweden's Gripen E (F-39). As the rising power of Brazil coupled with Portugal partner, the Portuguese speakers have their own transnational Portuguese interest. The relationship between the raising power of Brazil and the smaller Portugal mirrors the relationship between the larger USA and the smaller UK. Brazil has a large landmass (linked to mineral wealth) and a large enough population size to be near super-power. Work in progress CANZUK initiative is the English-speaking version of Lusophone Commonwealth's Lusophone Citizenship. Lusophone Commonwealth's integration is far more advanced when compared to the CANZUK initiative. Russia and China are NOT the only groups reverting back to historical empires.
    3
  1896. 3
  1897. 3
  1898. 3
  1899. 3
  1900. 3
  1901. 3
  1902. 3
  1903. 3
  1904. 3
  1905. 3
  1906. 3
  1907. 3
  1908. 3
  1909. 3
  1910. 3
  1911. 3
  1912. 3
  1913. 3
  1914. 3
  1915. 3
  1916. 3
  1917. 3
  1918. 2
  1919. 2
  1920. SU-35/SU-37's wing loadings are not low... USA has F-15C/D,  F-15E, F-22A, F-35A, F-35C, F-35B, F-18E/F. Wing loadings via empty weight. These wing loading numbers doesn't factor in body lift, LEX and angled twin tails. F-35A Empty weight: 29,030 lb (Year 2013 build). Wing area: 460 ft² Wing loading: 63.11 lbs/ sq feet. F-16C Block 52 Wing area: 300 ft² Empty weight: 18,900 lb Wing loading: 63 lbs/ sq feet. F-35A's empty weight is 1.54X scaled from F-16C. F-35A's wing area is 1.53X scaled from F-16C. F-35A's 43,000 lbf thrust is 1.50X scaled from F-16C's 28600 lbf. There's a near straight scaling between F16C to F-35. From http://breakingdefense.com/2014/06/gen-mike-hostage-on-the-f-35-no-growlers-needed-when-war-starts/3/ General Mike Hostage On The F-35 vs F-16 The F-35, he says, has “at least” the maneuverability and thrust and weight of the F-16. The F-35 is to the F-22 as the F-16 is to the F-15. F-35A Empty weight: 29,030 lb (Year 2013 build). Wing Area: 460 ft² Weapons: 2000 lb Fuel: 7070 lb  Combat load: 38100 lb Wing loading 82.83 lbs/ sq feet. Thrust: 43000 lbf Power-to-Weight: 1.13 : 1 F-16C Block 52 Empty weight: 18900 lb Wing Area: 300 ft² Weapons: 2000 lb Fuel: 3950 lb at 51% internal fuel tank Wing loading: 82.83 lbs/ sq feet. Combat Load: 24850 lb Thrust: 28600 lbf Power-to-Weight: 1.15 : 1 In terms of SFC(specific fuel consumption) at after burner, F-35A is about 64 percent of SU-35. F-35's adaptive engine upgrade will reduce "64 percent" number further i.e. lower is better for F-35 e.g. 25 percent increase fuel efficiency. F-35A's main target goal is to replace current service F-16C. References for F35's engine improvements during and after year 2013. (Note Ref 1) From Feb 2013, read http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/pratt-amp-whitney-to-test-upgraded-f135-this-year-382781/ The option to add 5 percent of thrust on top of 43,000 lbf i.e. 45150 lbf. This improvement also has 5 percent fuel efficiency increase from USN's Fuel Burn Reduction (FBR) programme. This engine improvement was tested late year 2013. This upgrades the hot core. (Note Ref 2) From Sep 2013, read http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/pratt-amp-whitney-and-afrl-start-testing-on-adaptive-fan-test-390994/ Pratt has another engine update for F-35 i.e. another 10% increase in thrust and 25 percent fuel efficiency increase. This is adaptive engine upgrade. (Note Ref 2) From http://www.pw.utc.com/Press/Story/20130619-0600/2013/All%20Categories Year 2016 for adaptive engine test with higher 10% increase in thrust power AND  25 percent increase in fuel efficiency. From Norwegians' F-35 briefings http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/FD/Temadokumenter/JSF_RBI-svar.pdf F-35 Block 6 has + Range improvements + Propulsion Improvements. Going beyond F-16C F-35A Empty weight: 29,030 lb (Year 2013 build). Wing Area: 460 ft² Weapons: 2000 lb Fuel: 7070 lb  Combat load: 38100 lb Wing loading 82.83 lbs/ sq feet. Thrust: 47300 lbf  (just the adaptive engine upgrade with 25 percent increase in fuel efficiency) Power-to-Weight: 1.24 : 1 *Thrust: 45150 lbf  (just the hot-core upgrade for power, neutral fuel consumption increase) Power-to-Weight: 1.185 : 1 --------------------------- F-22A (USAF) Wing area: 840 ft² Empty weight: 43340 lb Fuel:  12700 lb ** Weapons: 2000 lb six AIM-120 type A2A missiles Combat Weight: 58040 lbs Thrust: 70,000 lbf  Power-to-weight: 1.21 : 1 <--- Thrust: 74,000 lbf  (via F-16.net forums) Power-to-weight: 1.27 : 1 <--- Wing loading: 69.09 lbs/ sq feet. <--- F-15C Wing area: 608 ft² Empty weight: 28000 lb Fuel:  12700 lb ** Weapons: 2000 lb six AIM-120 type A2A missiles Combat Weight: 42700 lbs Thrust: 47540 lbf Power-to-weight: 1.11  : 1 <--- Wing loading: 70.23 lbs/ sq feet. <--- F-15E (USAF) Wing area: 608 ft² Empty weight: 31,700 lb Fuel:  12700 lb ** Weapons: 2000 lb six AIM-120 type A2A missiles Combat Weight: 46400 lbs Thrust: 58000 lbf   (F-15K has 58800 lbf) Power-to-weight: 1.25 : 1 <--- Wing loading: 76.32  lbs/ sq feet. <--- SU-35S Wing area: 667 ft² Empty weight: 40,570 lb Fuel:  12700 lb at 50% internal fuel Weapons: 2000 lb six AIM-120 type A2A missiles Max take-off weight: 76,060 lb Combat Weight: 55270 lbs Estimated on the available lift force: 20970 lbs (max takeoff weight - combat weight) Thrust: 63800 lbf Power-to-weight: 1.15 : 1 <--- Wing loading:  82.86 lbs/ sq feet. <--- SU-37 Wing area: 667 ft² Empty weight: 40,790 lb Fuel:  12700 lb at ~50% internal fuel Weapons: 2000 lb six AIM-120 type A2A missiles Max take-off weight: 76,060 lb Combat Weight: 55490 lbs Estimated on the available lift force: 20570 lbs (max takeoff weight - combat weight) Thrust: 64000 lbf Power-to-weight: 1.15 : 1 <--- Wing loading:  83.19 lbs/ sq feet. <--- SU-30MKI Wing area: 667 ft² Empty weight: 40,565 lb Fuel:  12700 lb at ~50% internal fuel Weapons: 2000 lb six AIM-120 type A2A missiles Combat Weight: 55,265 lbs Thrust: 55000 lbf Power-to-weight: 0.99  : 1 <--- LOL Wing loading:  82.85  lbs/ sq feet. <--- As single engine fighter advantages, F-35C still excellent role rates for displacement roll tactics. The Flanker has a pretty decent roll-rate per se (270°/s), but due to its engines being spaced widely apart it has a high moment of inertia so the rotation takes quite long to build up. Single engine aircraft (F-16, Mirage 2000) are most impressive in this regard. F-35C = 300 °/s.
    2
  1921. 2
  1922. 2
  1923. 2
  1924. 2
  1925. 2
  1926. 2
  1927. 2
  1928. 2
  1929. 2
  1930. 2
  1931. 2
  1932. 2
  1933. 2
  1934. 2
  1935. 2
  1936. 2
  1937. 2
  1938. 2
  1939. 2
  1940. 2
  1941. 2
  1942. 2
  1943. 2
  1944. 2
  1945. 2
  1946. 2
  1947. 2
  1948. 2
  1949. 2
  1950. 2
  1951. 2
  1952. 2
  1953. 2
  1954. 2
  1955. 2
  1956. 2
  1957. 2
  1958. 2
  1959. 2
  1960. 2
  1961. 2
  1962. 2
  1963. 2
  1964. 2
  1965. 2
  1966. 2
  1967. 2
  1968. 2
  1969. 2
  1970. 2
  1971. 2
  1972.  @kings2147  That's FALSE narrative. Timeline of Yugoslav breakup 22 January 1990: Slovenian, Croatian and Macedonian delegates abandon the last Congress of the Communist League of Yugoslavia. The Communist Party of Yugoslavia is dissolved. 1 July 1990: The Parliament of Slovenia votes to declare independence (but independence is not proclaimed). 1 October 1990: George Bush, in a meeting with the Yugoslav president of the Presidency, gives full support to Yugoslavia. 21 February 1991: After receiving news of the Slovenian parliament's decision to start legal actions for independence and for the possible creation of new union of independent states, the Croatian parliament makes a similar decision. 25 September 1991: Macedonia declares independence. 8 October 1991: Croatia declares independence from Yugoslavia. 2 December 1991: President of Macedonia sends an official letter to the presidents of the foreign governments asking for recognition of the independence of Macedonia. Immediately after that Greece starts military provocations on the Macedonian-Greece border. 11 December 1991: Ukraine recognizes Croatia. ... 19 December 1991: Germany announces that it will recognize Croatia on January 15, 1992, with or without the rest of the European Community. 23 December 1991: Germany becomes the first major power to recognize Croatia and Slovenia as independent states 15 January 1992: The European Community recognizes Slovenia and Croatia. 21 February 1992: United Nations Security Council Resolution 743 sets up a Protection Force (UNPROFOR) mandated to create three IJN Protected Areas (UNPAs) in Croatia. 30 May 1992: United Nations Security Council Resolution 757 imposed a wide range of economic and political sanctions against Serbia and Montenegro. 14 September 1992: United Nations Security Council Resolution 776 approved the expansion of UNPROFOR into Bosnia, where it was mandated to facilitate the provision of humanitarian aid throughout the region by protecting convoys run by the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). UNPROFOR was also intended to protect convoys of released detainees. 9 October 1992: United Nations Security Council Resolution 781 introduced a No-fly zone (NFZ) for all military flights over Bosnia. ... 7 February 1994: EU Foreign Ministers backed use of NATO airpower if necessary to lift Bosnian Serb siege of Sarajevo. 9 February 1994: At UN request, NATO agreed to authorise air strikes, declared 20 km total exclusion zone around Sarajevo and required Bosnian Serbs to withdraw heavy weapons from zone or place them under UN control within 10 days; also called on Bosnian Government to place heavy weapons in Sarajevo under UN control. Agreement between 'RS' and Bosnian Government to a ceasefire in Sarajevo, negotiated by Lieutenant-General Sir Michael Rose, then Commander of UN forces in Bosnia.
    2
  1973. 2
  1974. 2
  1975.  @MAINA_THETHERE_1704  For the Libya issue. Both Libyan officials and international states and organizations called for a no-fly zone over Libya in light of allegations that Muammar Gaddafi's military had conducted airstrikes against Libyan rebels in the Libyan Civil War. Timeline 21 February 2011: Libyan deputy Permanent Representative to the UN Ibrahim Dabbashi called "on the UN to impose a no-fly zone on all of Tripoli to cut off all supplies of arms and mercenaries to the regime." *23 February 2011: French President Nicolas Sarkozy pushed for the European Union (EU) to pass sanctions against Gaddafi (freezing Gaddafi family funds abroad) and demand he stop attacks against civilians. * >>>> 25 February 2011: Sarkozy said Gaddafi "must go." <<< 26 February 2011: United Nations Security Council Resolution 1970 was passed unanimously, referring the Libyan government to the International Criminal Court for gross human rights violations. It imposed an arms embargo on the country and a travel ban and assets freeze on the family of Muammar Al-Gaddafi and certain Government officials 28 February 2011: British Prime Minister David Cameron proposed the idea of a no-fly zone to prevent Gaddafi from "airlifting mercenaries" and "using his military aeroplanes and armoured helicopters against civilians. 12 March 2011: The Arab League "called on the United Nations Security Council to impose a no-fly zone over Libya in a bid to protect civilians from air attack." The Arab League's request was announced by Omani Foreign Minister Yusuf bin Alawi bin Abdullah, who stated that all member states present at the meeting agreed with the proposal. On 12 March, thousands of Libyan women marched in the streets of the rebel-held town of Benghazi, calling for the imposition of a no-fly zone over Libya. ----- The US supported French President Nicolas Sarkozy's Gaddafi "must go." Your narrative is FALSE.
    2
  1976. 2
  1977. 2
  1978. 2
  1979. 2
  1980. 2
  1981. 2
  1982. 2
  1983. 2
  1984.  @johnlo5687  Wrong with "business is business". http://archive.is/vNDW0 China’s protectionism comes home to roost. Archived copy article from ft.com https://graphitepublications.com/will-chinas-outrageous-rare-earth-monopoly-persist/ China's rare earth near-monopoly was built on SOE (state-own enterprise) which driven private competitors from the market. Rare earth is important for electronics component production logistics chain. https://www.forbes.com/sites/douglasbulloch/2016/10/12/protectionism-may-be-rising-around-the-world-but-in-china-it-never-went-away/#5dc3f5df73da Protectionism May Be Rising Around The World, But In China It Never Went Away https://www.afr.com/brand/chanticleer/chinese-tech-stocks-pose-an-investment-dilemma-20180815-h1410o Baidu became China's No.1 search engine partly because Google was outlawed. Tencent became the world's largest gaming company and owner of China's No.1 messaging system without needing to compete with Facebook's WhatsApp. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/20/business/economy/china-us-trade-tariffs.html For example, an American car going to China pays 25% import duty, but a Chinese car coming to the US only pays 2.5%, a tenfold difference. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 8, 2018 From Musk's March 8th, 2018, China already has 25 percent import duty on US made cars before Trump's response. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2018/07/12/reciprocity_is_the_method_to_trumps_madness_137496.html Reciprocity Is the Method to Trump's Madness Trump wanted trade reciprocity against China! If Trump executes His trade reciprocity against China, there would be two "Chinese characteristics" protectionist nations clashing with each other. EU is no better with its protectionist policies e.g. the gap between hard Brexit vs being an EU member state.
    2
  1985. 2
  1986. 2
  1987. 2
  1988. 2
  1989. 2
  1990. 2
  1991. 2
  1992. 2
  1993. 2
  1994. 2
  1995. 2
  1996. 2
  1997. 2
  1998. 2
  1999. 2
  2000. 2
  2001. 2
  2002. 2
  2003. 2
  2004. 2
  2005. 2
  2006. 2
  2007. 2
  2008. 2
  2009. 2
  2010. 2
  2011. 2
  2012. 2
  2013. 2
  2014. 2
  2015. 2
  2016. 2
  2017. 2
  2018. 2
  2019. 2
  2020. 2
  2021. 2
  2022. 2
  2023. 2
  2024. 2
  2025. 2
  2026. 2
  2027. 2
  2028. 2
  2029. 2
  2030. 2
  2031. 2
  2032. 2
  2033. 2
  2034. 2
  2035. 2
  2036. 2
  2037. 2
  2038. 2
  2039. 2
  2040. 2
  2041. 2
  2042. 2
  2043. 2
  2044. 2
  2045. 2
  2046. 2
  2047. 2
  2048. 2
  2049. 2
  2050. 2
  2051. 2
  2052. 2
  2053. 2
  2054. 2
  2055. 2
  2056. 2
  2057. 2
  2058. 2
  2059. 2
  2060. 2
  2061. 2
  2062. 2
  2063. 2
  2064. 2
  2065. 2
  2066. 2
  2067. 2
  2068. 2
  2069. 2
  2070. 2
  2071. 2
  2072. 2
  2073. 2
  2074. 2
  2075. 2
  2076. 2
  2077. 2
  2078. 2
  2079. 2
  2080. 2
  2081. 2
  2082. 2
  2083. 2
  2084. 2
  2085. 2
  2086. 2
  2087. 2
  2088. 2
  2089. 2
  2090. 2
  2091. 2
  2092. 2
  2093. 2
  2094. 2
  2095. 2
  2096. 2
  2097. 2
  2098. 2
  2099. 2
  2100. 2
  2101. 2
  2102. 2
  2103. 2
  2104. 2
  2105. 2
  2106. 2
  2107. 2
  2108. 2
  2109. 2
  2110. 2
  2111. 2
  2112. 2
  2113. 2
  2114. 2
  2115. 2
  2116. 2
  2117. 2
  2118. 2
  2119. 2
  2120. 2
  2121. 2
  2122. 2
  2123. 2
  2124. 2
  2125. 2
  2126. 2
  2127. 2
  2128. 2
  2129. 2
  2130. 2
  2131. 2
  2132. 2
  2133. 2
  2134. 2
  2135. 2
  2136. 2
  2137. 2
  2138. 2
  2139. 2
  2140. 2
  2141. 2
  2142. 2
  2143. 2
  2144. 2
  2145. 2
  2146. 2
  2147. 2
  2148. 2
  2149. 2
  2150. 2
  2151. 2
  2152. 2
  2153. 2
  2154. 2
  2155. 2
  2156. 2
  2157. 2
  2158. 2
  2159. France has backed Italy’s decision to block COVID-19 vaccine exports to Australia. France has shown its bias towards Italy ahead of Australia. -------------------- A French lawmaker raised questions in the country’s parliament in June about Australian concerns over delays, and whether Australia might be considering submarine alternatives, French government records show. Proving the French were aware of the cost overruns and the failure to complete the design on time had created issues with the Australians. After Australia had spent 2.5 billion dollars for no tangible results. The French asked for an extension nearly two years ago which would extend the design completion date from July 2022 to September 2023. Cost overruns, failure to deliver contractual obligations on time, hostility from the French whenever Australia tried to work out these issues with the French. 2.5 billion dollars and no finished design after five years. That is a cost overrun and all the French lies and tantrums don't change the facts. France failed to honour the contract with Australia. Macron is a lying brat, he should explain why the French have failed to deliver when all they were doing is modifying an existing design from nuclear propulsion to diesel-electric propulsion. After five years and 2.5 billion dollars they did not even finish the design let alone start building the first sub in France as specified by the contract, nor did they start building a shipyard in Adelaide as specified by the contract. Why Australian media is spinning this issue with the French as Australia's fault when the evidence is there for all to see says everything about the Australian media. Whether you love him or hate him, Morrison pull the plug on a scam, a scam that cost Australia 2.5 billion dollars and was only going to get worse, for a submarine that belongs back in the 20th century and does not meet Australia's defence needs in the 21st Century.
    2
  2160. 2
  2161. 2
  2162. 2
  2163. 2
  2164. 2
  2165. 2
  2166. 2
  2167. 2
  2168. 2
  2169. 2
  2170. 2
  2171. 2
  2172. 2
  2173. 2
  2174. 2
  2175. 2
  2176. 2
  2177. 2
  2178. 2
  2179. 2
  2180. 2
  2181. 2
  2182. 2
  2183. 2
  2184. 2
  2185. 2
  2186. 2
  2187. 2
  2188. 2
  2189. 2
  2190. 2
  2191. 2
  2192. 2
  2193. 2
  2194. 2
  2195. 2
  2196. 2
  2197. 2
  2198. 2
  2199. 2
  2200. 2
  2201. 2
  2202. 2
  2203. 2
  2204.  @abhimanusingh66  Land Area for potential raw materials with the war of attrition context Canada = 9.985 million km² (CPTPP member) Australia = 7.692 million km² (CPTPP member) UK = 242,495 km² (soon to be CPTPP member) NZ= 268,021 km² (CPTPP member) Subtotal: CANZUK group's 18.187 million km² United States = 9.834 million km² Japan = 377,975 km² (CPTPP member) Europe = 4.233 million km² India = 3.287 million km² Russia = 17.13 million km² China = 9.597 million km² ----- West's joint hypersonic agreements Japan-US AU-UK-US Israel-US i.e. Arrow 4. UK-JP's Meteor replacement with the Joint New Air-to-Air Missile (JNAAM) program. India is not part of the 14 Eyes Alliance. ----- Brazil and Portugal are the major powers of the Lusophone Commonwealth. Larger Brazil and smaller Portugal relationship mirror the larger USA and smaller UK relationships. Lusophone Commonwealth's Defense component, In 2016, CPLP revised its cooperation protocol in defense, affirming the organization in the promotion of peace and security. The 2017 Exercício Felino military exercise taking place in Academia Militar das Agulhas Negras, Resende, in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, aims for the increased interoperability of the armed forces of Angola, Brazil, Cape Verde, Equatorial Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Mozambique, Portugal, São Tomé and Príncipe, and Timor-Leste. The Parliamentary Assembly of Lusophony is the body that brings together the representations of all the Parliaments of the Member States, constituted on the basis of the respective electoral results of the legislative elections. Lusophone Citizenship Easing citizens' cross-border movement between the member states was proposed at the 2017 CPLP Summit.[30] This proposal by Portugal and Cape Verde to Brazil was thought by some to conflict with Europe's Schengen area. However, this free movement is based on a different model: as residence permits, associated with the recognition of academic degrees and professional qualification, and maintenance of social rights including pension systems. It would henceforth establish Lusophone citizenship. Brazil has a nuclear-powered submarine and Sweden's Gripen E (F-39). As the rising power of Brazil coupled with Portugal partner, the Portuguese speakers have their own transnational Portuguese interest. The relationship between the rising power of Brazil and the smaller Portugal mirrors the relationship between the larger USA and the smaller UK. Brazil has a large landmass (linked to mineral wealth) and a large enough population size to be near super-power. Work in progress CANZUK initiative is the English-speaking version of Lusophone Commonwealth's Lusophone Citizenship. Lusophone Commonwealth's integration has progressed deeper than the CANZUK initiative. Brazil has placed higher importance on Lusophone Commonwealth over BRICS. You're overselling India's importance.
    2
  2205. 2
  2206. 2
  2207. 2
  2208. 2
  2209. 2
  2210. 2
  2211. 2
  2212. 2
  2213. 2
  2214. 2
  2215. 2
  2216. 2
  2217. 2
  2218. 2
  2219. 2
  2220. 2
  2221. 2
  2222. 2
  2223. 2
  2224. 2
  2225. 2
  2226. 2
  2227.  @locksmack  >If we assume worst case scenario where 100% of the electricity to charge a Tesla is from coal, the Tesla still has lower emissions than an internal combustion engine car. That’s the beauty of EV efficiency. For CO2 in grams per km But let’s start at the tailpipe, beginning with a regular internal combustion vehicle. A Volkswagen Golf 1.0 TSI is a frugal car, officially emitting 124g/km of CO2. However, we should also consider the CO2 generated by producing the fuel used by this car. This lengthy process varies in emissions depending on where the oil is produced, starting with getting oil to the refinery, refining it, and transporting it to the pump. The average figure for emissions from fuel production was calculated to be 30% extra on top of tailpipe emissions for petrol/gasoline and 24% for diesel by Auke Hoekstra, a senior advisor in smart mobility at Eindhoven University of Technology. In other words, the “well to wheel” emissions for the Golf are 162g/km of CO2. Not terrible, but a considerable bump on the published figure. Next, let’s do a similar calculation for a battery-electric vehicle (BEV). I’m going to choose the Volkswagen ID.3 with the Pro Performance powertrain (58kWh battery and 204PS motor), because it’s a similarly sized vehicle to the Golf and is essentially the latter’s BEV replacement. The ID.3 Pro Performance has a top WLTP energy consumption rating of 250Wh/mile, or 156Wh/km. Obviously, the vehicle itself emits no CO2, but the electricity used to charge the battery does. On average, a kWh of electricity in the UK produced 233g of CO2e in 2019 during generation. This varies a lot worldwide. The US national grid produced 417g per kWh in 2019, and in China the figure was over 600g per kWh. Australia, with one of the world’s worst polluting national grids, generated 656.4g of CO2 per kWh. Taking these figures into account, this would mean the ID.3’s electricity would have produced 36g/km of CO2 in the UK, up to 103g/km in Australia. So even with one of the most polluting national grids, BEVs really are greener “well to wheel” than fossil fuel. ------ Volkswagen Golf 1.0 TSI has CO2 162g/km of CO2. Volkswagen ID.3 has CO2 103g/km in Australia (1). Toyota Prius Hybrid 2018 (on 15-inch wheels) has 78g/km, based on new WLTP testing (2). UK has nuclear power. References 1. Electric Vehicles Are Not Zero Emissions - But They Are Much Greener Than Fossil Fuel And Hydrogen, Forbes, Oct 2021 2. Toyota increases published CO2 emissions for Prius and Prius+, Fleetnews UK, 2018,.
    2
  2228. 2
  2229. 2
  2230. 2
  2231. 2
  2232. 2
  2233. 2
  2234. 2
  2235. 2
  2236. 2
  2237. 2
  2238. 2
  2239. 2
  2240. 2
  2241. 2
  2242. 2
  2243. 2
  2244. 2
  2245. 2
  2246. 2
  2247. 2
  2248. 2
  2249. 2
  2250. 2
  2251. 2
  2252. 2
  2253. 2
  2254.  @qinby1182  My "Australia doesn't exploit its mineral wealth like China's raw materials to the manufacturing chain" context based on the following news articles From WSJ Date: Aug. 15, 2010 Title: After securing Rare-Earth monopoly, China Dangles Rare-Earth Resources to Lure Investment BEIJING—China is cautiously using rare-earth resources as bait for foreign investment that could bring in sophisticated technologies that it needs. Industry and government officials have begun talking about a Chinese government plan to offer access to its rare-earth resources—which are used in products such as hybrid-car batteries and missiles and are under strict export restrictions—to get companies including electronics manufacturers and auto makers to set up rare-earth-processing plants in China. ---- My comment: China has a government policy that enforces manufacturing located in China when using China's rare earth. Setting up the leverage to use China's rare earth . From Graphite Publications article from 2010. Title: Will chinas Outrageous Rare Earth Monopoly Persist Year Date: 2010. Heavy importers of these REEs such as the U.S., Germany, and Japan believe these rationales disguise China’s true exploitative motive: to force foreign factories to move to China to keep their costs low and their supply high Second, importing countries have been concerned with the agglutination of Chinese mining companies in what appears to be a calculated move to make China’s monopoly even more monopolistic. Most prominently, Bao Gang Rare Earth (BGRE), a state-owned REE company forcibly merged with four smaller companies and numerous smaller companies were shut down to create a monopoly in Northern China which accounts for two-thirds of China’s output. Moreover, China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) decreed minimum production thresholds for domestic companies in early August 2012, essentially truncating the smallest REE producers as well as with 20% of China’s rare earths capacity. ---- Your argument and mindset are simplistic, NOT holistic. You're stupid while China is smart. Australia's increase in rare earth exports is relatively recent and backed by the Australian government's $2 billion state loan facility (Sep 2021) for Australian critical minerals projects.
    2
  2255. 2
  2256. 2
  2257. 2
  2258. 2
  2259. 2
  2260. 2
  2261. 2
  2262. 2
  2263. 2
  2264. 2
  2265. 2
  2266. 2
  2267. 2
  2268. 2
  2269. 2
  2270. 2
  2271. 2
  2272. 2
  2273. 2
  2274. 2
  2275. 2
  2276. 2
  2277. 2
  2278. 2
  2279. 2
  2280. 2
  2281. 2
  2282. 2
  2283. 2
  2284. 2
  2285. 2
  2286. 2
  2287. 2
  2288. 2
  2289. 2
  2290. 2
  2291.  @vaibhav07  Myth 1: NATO promised Russia it would not expand after the Cold War Fact: Such an agreement was never made. NATO’s door has been open to new members since it was founded in 1949 – and that has never changed. This “Open Door Policy” is enshrined in Article 10 of NATO’s founding treaty, which says “any other European State in a position to further the principles of this Treaty and to contribute to the security of the North Atlantic” can apply for membership. Decisions on membership are taken by consensus among all Allies. No treaty signed by the United States, Europe and Russia included provisions on NATO membership. The idea of NATO expansion beyond a united Germany was not on the agenda in 1989, particularly as the Warsaw Pact still existed. This was confirmed by Mikhail Gorbachev in an interview in 2014: "The topic of 'NATO expansion' was not discussed at all, and it wasn't brought up in those years. I say this with full responsibility. Not a single Eastern European country raised the issue, not even after the Warsaw Pact ceased to exist in 1991. Western leaders didn't bring it up, either." Declassified White House transcripts also reveal that, in 1997, Bill Clinton consistently refused Boris Yeltsin's offer of a 'gentlemen's agreement' that no former Soviet Republics would enter NATO: "I can't make commitments on behalf of NATO, and I'm not going to be in the position myself of vetoing NATO expansion with respect to any country, much less letting you or anyone else do so…NATO operates by consensus."
    2
  2292. 2
  2293. 2
  2294. 2
  2295. 2
  2296. 2
  2297. 2
  2298. 2
  2299. 2
  2300. 2
  2301. 2
  2302. 2
  2303. 2
  2304. 2
  2305. 2
  2306. 2
  2307. 2
  2308. 2
  2309. 2
  2310. 2
  2311. 2
  2312. 2
  2313. 2
  2314. 2
  2315. 2
  2316. 2
  2317. 2
  2318. 2
  2319. 2
  2320. 2
  2321. 2
  2322. 2
  2323. 2
  2324. 2
  2325. 2
  2326. 2
  2327. 2
  2328. 2
  2329. 2
  2330. 2
  2331. 2
  2332. 2
  2333. 2
  2334. 2
  2335. 2
  2336. 2
  2337. 2
  2338. 2
  2339. 2
  2340. 2
  2341. 2
  2342. 2
  2343. 2
  2344. 2
  2345. 2
  2346. 2
  2347. 2
  2348. 2
  2349. 2
  2350. 2
  2351. 2
  2352. 2
  2353. 2
  2354. 2
  2355. 2
  2356. 2
  2357. 2
  2358. 2
  2359. 2
  2360. 2
  2361. 2
  2362. 2
  2363. 2
  2364. 2
  2365. 2
  2366. 2
  2367. 2
  2368. 2
  2369. 2
  2370. 2
  2371. 2
  2372. 2
  2373. 2
  2374. 2
  2375. 2
  2376. 2
  2377. 2
  2378. 2
  2379. 2
  2380. 2
  2381. 2
  2382. 2
  2383. 2
  2384. 2
  2385. 2
  2386. 2
  2387. 2
  2388. 2
  2389. 2
  2390. 2
  2391. 2
  2392. 2
  2393. 2
  2394. 2
  2395. 2
  2396. 2
  2397. 2
  2398. 2
  2399. 2
  2400. 2
  2401. 2
  2402. 2
  2403. 2
  2404.  @edwinbronfield8928  International trade with free-market idealogy wouldn't work when there's a large participant with large-scale government support and SOEs. From graphitepublications.com/will-chinas-outrageous-rare-earth-monopoly-persist/ China's rare earth near-monopoly was built on SOE (state-own enterprise) which driven private competitors from the market. Rare earth is important for the electronics component production logistics chain. From forbes.com/sites/douglasbulloch/2016/10/12/protectionism-may-be-rising-around-the-world-but-in-china-it-never-went-away/#5dc3f5df73da Protectionism May Be Rising Around The World, But In China It Never Went Away Promises unkept? Since joining the WTO in 2001, China has repeatedly insisted that it will live up to those undertakings made on entry. In particular, the use of currency manipulation has been identified by the US as a breech of the commitment to end price controls for the purposes of protecting domestic industries. This became a major political issue from 2005 onwards, and has only recently subsided because it is assumed that the RMB is slightly overvalued on the market. Nevertheless, for years it was deliberate policy for the PBoC to accumulate US Dollars and suppress the exchange rate for the RMB, resulting in exactly the price distortions China had committed to eliminate in 2001, and fuelling an enormous trade surplus with the US, which persists and expands to this day. Furthermore TRIPS implementation has been given some effect on paper, but has made little progress when it comes to 'enforcement.' This is (according to the WTO) as recently as February 2015, fully 14 years after TRIPS was supposed to be already in effect. The US Trade Representative produces an annual report to Congress on China's WTO compliance which leaves little room to conclude they have so far lived up to their accession commitments. The most recent several-hundred-page document - produced in December 2015 - recites a long list of small measures, committees established, announcements made and new administrative complications faced, all continuing disputes over an agreement theoretically in effect since 2001. Although, therefore, protectionism is rising around the world, it is also true to say that existing practices of protectionism have not fallen in the way that they should have since China's accession to the WTO in 2001. Because of this lack of progress in easing trade, the extended period of currency manipulation, the lack of observance of TRIPS and the sheer administrative resistance exporters face when trying to get their products into China, we now face of world of highly unbalanced trade, and rising mistrust. And it is this that is leading to rising protectionism; the simple fact that it never went away. --------------- Note that Australia created its universal health care system without the Communist-style mass stealing i.e. built a parallel system to the private health care system. Australia's universal health care system does not compete in international trade.
    2
  2405. 2
  2406. 2
  2407. 2
  2408. 2
  2409. 2
  2410. 2
  2411. 2
  2412. 2
  2413. 2
  2414. 2
  2415. 2
  2416. 2
  2417. 2
  2418. 2
  2419. 2
  2420. 2
  2421. 2
  2422. 2
  2423. 2
  2424. 2
  2425. 2
  2426. 2
  2427. 2
  2428. 2
  2429. 2
  2430. 2
  2431. 2
  2432. 2
  2433. 2
  2434. 2
  2435. 2
  2436. 2
  2437. 2
  2438. 2
  2439. 2
  2440. 2
  2441. 2
  2442. 2
  2443. 2
  2444. 2
  2445. 2
  2446. 2
  2447. 2
  2448. 2
  2449. 2
  2450. 2
  2451. 2
  2452. 2
  2453. 2
  2454. 2
  2455. 2
  2456. 2
  2457. 2
  2458. 2
  2459. 2
  2460. 2
  2461. 2
  2462. 2
  2463.  @tomogburn2462  Not correct, from econlib.org/archives/2004/06/milton_friedman_1.html In an interview, Milton Friedman explains why shifting education and health care from the market to the government is inefficient. Milton Friedman is against government-run health care. Milton Friedman assumes the market will behave, which contradicted Australia's capitalist nanny to keep the market honest and efficient. Milton Friedman's argument is bullshit. Australia's health care administration efficiency (ranked 1st) murdered the US's health care system's administration efficiency. From theconversation.com/why-biologics-were-such-a-big-deal-in-the-trans-pacific-partnership-48595 During the Obama-Biden administration, Australia's center-right wing (Liberal-National Coalition) federal government has identified the US "data-exclusivity-medications" condition as the killer to their universal health care system. Australia's medical patent system also supports the private insurance system's cost controls. Obama-Biden Democrats attempted to wreak Australia's single-payer health care system which caused the center-right wing (Liberal-National Coalition) federal government to defend Australia's health care system! Australia implements its universal health service with the aid of "the ideal market competition" principles while the classic socialism approach would have nationalized the drug companies. Australia's NIB (private insurance) managing director/CEO Mark Fitzgibbon (with Harvard Business School education in Global Strategic Management masters degree) who argued for the removal of Australia's Medicare system, which caused the center-right wing (Liberal-National Coalition) federal government to defend Australia's health care system with an "over my dead body" counter reply. Mark Fitzgibbon wants Australia to adopt US-style Obama care with private insurance overhead. DO NOT copy and paste American politics on another country's conservatives. PS; I do support the CANZUK initiative (with a combined population size of 134 million) as an alternative to the USA. Churchhill is a conservative-liberal.
    2
  2464. 2
  2465. 2
  2466.  @personaa422  Since your left-right political spectrum arguments are US-centric Trump's immigration arguments are already implemented in Australia/New Zealand FOR MANY YEARS.; 1. Limit queue jumpers 2. Limit birth tourism 3. Limit high potential "public charge" immigration 4. Points score system From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jus_soli#/media/File:Jus_soli_world.svg The majority of the world restricts limits birth tourism. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Points-based_immigration_system Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and the United Kingdom implements the points-based immigration system. PS; I do support the CANZUK initiative as a geopolitical/geo-economic alternative to the US model. CANZUK countries have universal health care while maintaining superior economic freedoms index scores (when compared to the US). Refer to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_of_Economic_Freedom#2021_Index Rankings for Index of Economic Freedom for 2021. New Zealand = 2nd Australia = 3rd United Kingdom = 7th Canada = 9th United States = 20th. LOL HAHAHAH My support for the CANZUK initiative recognise the fact that economies of scale issues for Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom are not in the critical mass. >The democrats, as a party, continually bend to republican desires. That's BS, Democratic party has the control over House of Representatives, Senate, and President. George Floyd's debacle is under the Democratic party-run state and mayoral level for MANY years. Keep voting the same shit = continual shit results. In Australia, we threw out pro-GOP IR (Industrial Relations) Howard government in a large landslide. PM John Howard lost his seat even in his "rich" political seat. The large landslide against the Howard government purged out pro-GOP IR (Industrial Relation) in the Liberal-National parties. The majority of Australians don't tolerate GOP-style IR, we threw them out in the landslide. More than 70% of IOC member countries have rejected the Democratic party's racist BLM bullshit.
    2
  2467. 2
  2468. 2
  2469. 2
  2470. 2
  2471. 2
  2472. 2
  2473. 2
  2474. 2
  2475. 2
  2476. 2
  2477. 2
  2478. 2
  2479. 2
  2480. 2
  2481. 2
  2482. 2
  2483. 2
  2484. 2
  2485. 2
  2486. 2
  2487. 2
  2488. 2
  2489. 2
  2490. 2
  2491. 2
  2492. 2
  2493. 2
  2494. 2
  2495. 2
  2496. 2
  2497. 2
  2498. 2
  2499. 2
  2500. 2
  2501. 2
  2502. 2
  2503. 2
  2504. 2
  2505. 2
  2506. 2
  2507. 2
  2508. 2
  2509. 2
  2510. 2
  2511. 2
  2512. 2
  2513. 2
  2514. 2
  2515. 2
  2516. 2
  2517. 2
  2518. 2
  2519. 2
  2520. 2
  2521. 2
  2522. 2
  2523. 2
  2524. 2
  2525. 2
  2526. 2
  2527. 2
  2528. 2
  2529. 2
  2530. 2
  2531. 2
  2532. 2
  2533. 2
  2534. 2
  2535. 2
  2536. 2
  2537. 2
  2538. 2
  2539. 2
  2540. 2
  2541. 2
  2542. 2
  2543. 2
  2544. 2
  2545. 2
  2546. 2
  2547. 2
  2548. 2
  2549. 2
  2550. 2
  2551. 2
  2552. 2
  2553. 2
  2554. 2
  2555. 2
  2556. 2
  2557. 2
  2558. 2
  2559. 2
  2560. 2
  2561. 2
  2562. 2
  2563. 2
  2564. 2
  2565. 2
  2566. 2
  2567. 2
  2568. 2
  2569. 2
  2570. 2
  2571. 2
  2572. 2
  2573.  @eliso5973  Participating countries in a total war situation, the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) restriction is rendered useless. The problem for defending countries is the R&D time for reaching a working nuclear bomb along with its delivery platform after a hot war is started. Russia betting on Ukraine's underfunded R&D and longer duration time for building a working nuclear bomb and its delivery platform. The US, UK, and Russia signed Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum that traded Ukraine's nuclear weapons for security assurances. The US made a security assurance for Taiwan in exchange for Taiwan halting its nuclear weapons program. The US made a security assurance for Japan in exchange for Japan halting its nuclear weapons program. The US made a security assurance for South Korea in exchange for South Korea halting its nuclear weapons program. The US made a security assurance for Australia in exchange for Australia halting its nuclear weapons program and exiting its partnership with the UK's nuclear weapon program. The UK, France, and Israel don't trust US security assurances after the Suez Canal incident i.e. allowing USSR to threaten a nuclear attack on UK, France, and Israel after the US withdraws nuclear umbrella protections. US EXIT from Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum has a negative outcome for US allies being in the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). Russia has exited Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum. Many Republicans want EXIT from Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum without paying compensation for the lost R&D time. Trump argued for US nuclear umbrella protection EXIT for South Korea and Japan. Trump doesn't give a damn about South Korea's and Japan's democratic status. Many economically advanced countries with reserve nuclear weapon capability can develop a nuclear bomb in 6 months to 2 years, and a delivery platform needs to be created at the same time. 6 month to 2 years gap could mean the end of the country's independent existence by "old world" imperialist powers. Unlike the US, "old world" imperialist powers like Putin's Russia plays for keeps and they don't maintain another country's territorial integrity. There are no formal territorial assurance agreements between Australia and China. Both current China nor Russia doesn't support the status quo and it shows by their actions i.e. words are cheap.
    2
  2574. 2
  2575. 2
  2576. 2
  2577. 2
  2578. 2
  2579. 2
  2580. 2
  2581. 2
  2582. 2
  2583. 2
  2584. 2
  2585. 2
  2586. 2
  2587. 2
  2588. 2
  2589. 2
  2590. 2
  2591. 2
  2592. There's a difference between annual profit-and-loss vs accumulated liabilities in a balance sheet. From GPAS__2021 pdf Pension (mandated nanny state saving funds) vs GDP ratio for 2021 Five Eyes/Five Passport Group, Australia, $2,333 billion, 174.8% (CPTPP member, Nordic model), Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (USMCA, CPTPP member, Nordic model) United Kingdom, $3,564 billion, 135.1% (near CPTPP member, Nordic model) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% Notice the Five Eyes group has similar pension assets to GDP ratio results Large-scale mandated savings funds enable the government to issue government bonds and large-scale bond buyer markets! EU Finland, $279 billion, 104.3% (Nordic model) France, $166 billion, 6.5% Germany, $548 billion, 14.5% Italy, $231 billion, 12.5% <----- PIIGS Netherlands, $1,900 billion, 214.4%, (Nordic model) Ireland, $197 billion, 49.4% <----- PIIGS Spain, $44 billion, 3.6% <----- PIIGS The EU lacks strategic savings coordination. Non-EU, Europe Switzerland, $1,163 billion, 164.3% (Nordic model) North America United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (USMCA member) Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (USMCA, CPTPP member, Nordic model) Mexico, $259 billion, 24.9% (USMCA, CPTPP member) South America Brazil, $195 billion,14.3% Chile, $243 billion, 99.2% (CPTPP member) East Asia, South East Asia China, $285 billion, 1.9% Hong Kong, $199 billion, 58.3% Japan, $3,613 billion, 73.6% (CPTPP member) South Korea, $968 billion, 61.0% Malaysia, $279 billion, 83.0% (CPTPP member) South-Central Asia India, $184 billion, 7.1%
    2
  2593.  @podemosurss8316  For WW2, USA production is more than 4 times since the US was the only nation to mass-produced aircraft carriers. Germany Panzer VII Tiger II tank has 492 units x 68 tons = 33,456 tons Panzer VI Tiger I tank has 1,347 units x 44 tons = 59,268 tons Panzer V Panther tank has 6000 units x 44 tons = 264,000 tons Panzer IV has 8,553 unit x 25 tons = 213,825 tons Total: 570,549 tons Czech's Panzer 38(t) has 1414 units x 10 tons = 141,40 tons USA M26 tanks has 2,212 units x 44 tons = 97,328 tons M26 has 90 mm gun. M4 tanks has 49,234 units x 33 tons = 1,624,722, Russian T34 tanks has similar unit number and tonnage . M10 tank destroyer has 6,406 units x 29 tons = 185,774 tons M18 tank destroyer has 2,507 units x 39 tons = 97,773 tons M36 tank destroyer has 2,324 units x 29 tons = 67,396 tons M36 has 90 mm gun. Sub-Total: 2,072,993 tons M4 Sherman Firefly (UK) has 2,200 units x 35 tons = 77,000 tons. Firefly takes on Tiger I and Panther tanks. The US has both quality (M26) and numbers (M4). A significant amount of the US Army's tonnage was against the German army. The US has the following aircraft carrier production 24 Essex-class fleet carriers with 90 to 110 aircraft each. 650,400 tons for Essex-class. 21 Commencement Bay class with 228,900 tons 50 Casablanca-class with 390,000 tons. 45 Bogue-class with 747,900 tons 3 Yorktown-class fleet carriers with 59,400 tons Sub-Total: 3,798,645 tons Modern-day USN aircraft carrier tonnage is just about 1,460,000 tons. A significant amount of USN's tonnage was against the Japanese navy. WW2 UK has similar aircraft carrier builds as Imperial Japan i.e. around 10 to 11 units. Not including UK, US and Canada other surface combat ships e.g. destroyers, heavy cruisers, battleships and 'etc'. Grand Total: 5,871,638 tons For the US, that's already 10.3X times over Germany's iron/steel tonnage extract/production. WW2 Russian navy is small. WW2 German navy is small. Both Canada and the USA have the advantage of the entire North American continent on raw metal and oil resources. USSR has access to its very large land mass's raw resource. European mainland is raw resource-poor, hence the reason for Hitler wanting Russian lands. EU is pushing Paris Accord to "even the playing field" against energy-rich competitors!
    2
  2594. 2
  2595. 2
  2596. 2
  2597. 2
  2598. 2
  2599.  @clo5282  Q: So why isn’t Russia a member of NATO? A: Despite Russia signaling its interest to join NATO, there has since been a lot of tension between them. “Once Russia can show it is upholding democracy and human rights, NATO can seriously consider its membership,”says Rasmussen, the former Danish Prime Minister who served as NATO Secretary General from 2009 to 2014. In the meantime, he adds “we tried to build strong cooperation with Moscow.” He cites the 2002 Russia-NATO council, a development of the 1997 Act, which serves as a mechanism for cooperation, consensus building and joint-decision making. “We do share common interests. We cooperated on counter terrorism in Afghanistan, counter narcotics and counter piracy,” says Rasmussen. ---- For Transnistria, the region's origins can be traced to the Moldavian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic, which was formed in 1924 within the Ukrainian SSR. During World War II, the Soviet Union took parts of the Moldavian ASSR, which was dissolved, and of the Kingdom of Romania's Bessarabia to form the Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic in 1940. The Moldavian SSR, organised by a decision of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR on 2 August 1940, was formed out of a part of Bessarabia (taken from Romania on 28 June, after the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact) and out of a part of the Moldavian ASSR roughly equivalent to present-day Transnistria. Transnistria was a product of NAZI-Germany's and USSR's Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact. Russia is actually supporting the NAZI-era Molotov–Ribbentrop pact ---- Russia's NATO membership was frozen due to the 1992 Russo-Moldovan (Transnistria) and 2008 Russo-Georgian conflicts. From Transnistria War, Putin's 2022 tactics against Ukraine weren't original since Boris Yeltsin has employed them in 1992. Boris Yeltsin's Russia replaced Warsaw Pact with Collective Security Treaty Organisation (CSTO) in 1992, but countries like Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, and Bulgaria have PTSD against Russia.
    2
  2600. 2
  2601. 2
  2602. 2
  2603. 2
  2604. 2
  2605. 2
  2606. 2
  2607. 2
  2608. 2
  2609. 2
  2610. 2
  2611. 2
  2612. 2
  2613. 2
  2614. 2
  2615. 2
  2616. 2
  2617. 2
  2618. 2
  2619. 2
  2620. 2
  2621. 2
  2622. 2
  2623. 2
  2624. 2
  2625. 2
  2626. 2
  2627. 2
  2628. 2
  2629. 2
  2630. 2
  2631. 2
  2632. 2
  2633. 2
  2634. 2
  2635. 2
  2636. 2
  2637. 2
  2638. 2
  2639. 2
  2640. 2
  2641. 2
  2642. 2
  2643. 2
  2644. 2
  2645. 2
  2646. 2
  2647. 2
  2648. 2
  2649. 2
  2650. 2
  2651. 2
  2652. 2
  2653. 2
  2654. 2
  2655. 2
  2656. 2
  2657. 2
  2658. 2
  2659. 2
  2660. 2
  2661. 2
  2662. 2
  2663. 2
  2664. 2
  2665. 2
  2666. 2
  2667. 2
  2668. 2
  2669. 2
  2670. 2
  2671. 2
  2672. 2
  2673. 2
  2674. 2
  2675. 2
  2676. 2
  2677. 2
  2678. 2
  2679. 2
  2680. 2
  2681. 2
  2682. 2
  2683. 2
  2684. 2
  2685. 2
  2686. 2
  2687. 2
  2688. 2
  2689. 2
  2690. 2
  2691. 2
  2692. 2
  2693. 2
  2694. 2
  2695. 2
  2696. 2
  2697. 2
  2698. 2
  2699. 2
  2700. 2
  2701. 2
  2702. 2
  2703. 2
  2704. 2
  2705. 2
  2706. 2
  2707. 2
  2708. 2
  2709. 2
  2710. 2
  2711. 2
  2712. 2
  2713. 2
  2714. 2
  2715. 2
  2716. 2
  2717. 2
  2718. 2
  2719. 2
  2720. 2
  2721. 2
  2722. 2
  2723. 2
  2724. 2
  2725. 2
  2726. 2
  2727. 2
  2728. 2
  2729. 2
  2730. 2
  2731. 2
  2732. 2
  2733. 2
  2734. 2
  2735. 2
  2736. 2
  2737. 2
  2738. 2
  2739. 2
  2740. 2
  2741. 2
  2742. 2
  2743. 2
  2744. 2
  2745. 2
  2746. 2
  2747. 2
  2748. 2
  2749. 2
  2750. 2
  2751. 2
  2752. 2
  2753. 2
  2754. 2
  2755. 2
  2756. 2
  2757. 2
  2758. 2
  2759. 2
  2760. 2
  2761. 2
  2762. 2
  2763. 2
  2764. 2
  2765. 2
  2766. 2
  2767. 2
  2768. 2
  2769. 2
  2770. 2
  2771. 2
  2772. 2
  2773.  @oogdhugee_3072  What is a refugee The 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (the 1951 Refugee Convention) is the key international legal document defining who is a refugee, their rights and the legal obligations of countries that are signatories to the 1951 Refugee Convention. Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Refugee Convention defines a ‘refugee’ as: a person who is outside his country of nationality or habitual residence has a well-founded fear of persecution because of his race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinion, and is unable or unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country, or to return there, for fear of persecution. A Convention ‘refugee’ is different from an ‘asylum seeker’ because the former has had their asylum claims assessed and been found to satisfy the above definition. This assessment can be done by a country that has acceded to the 1951 Refugee Convention or by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). There is no such thing as a ‘genuine refugee’. A refugee by technical definition is simply someone who has been recognised as satisfying the above Convention definition. Further, a person is a refugee within the meaning of the 1951 Convention as soon as they satisfy the above definition. This might actually occur before their refugee status is formally determined by a country or the UNHCR. Refugee status is therefore declaratory in nature—in that a refugee does not become a refugee because they have been recognised to be one but rather, they are recognised because they are a refugee.
    2
  2774. 2
  2775. 2
  2776. 2
  2777. 2
  2778. 2
  2779. 2
  2780. 2
  2781. 2
  2782. 2
  2783. 2
  2784. 2
  2785. 2
  2786. 2
  2787. 2
  2788. 2
  2789. 2
  2790. 2
  2791. 2
  2792. 2
  2793. 2
  2794. 2
  2795. 2
  2796. 2
  2797. 2
  2798. 2
  2799. 2
  2800. 2
  2801. 2
  2802. 2
  2803. 2
  2804. 2
  2805. 2
  2806. 2
  2807. 2
  2808. 2
  2809. 2
  2810. 2
  2811. 2
  2812. 2
  2813. 2
  2814. 2
  2815. 2
  2816. 2
  2817. 2
  2818. 2
  2819. 2
  2820. 2
  2821. 2
  2822. 2
  2823. 2
  2824. 2
  2825. 2
  2826. 2
  2827. 2
  2828. 2
  2829. 2
  2830. 2
  2831. 2
  2832. 2
  2833. 2
  2834. 2
  2835. 2
  2836. 2
  2837. 2
  2838. 2
  2839. 2
  2840. 2
  2841. 2
  2842. 2
  2843. 2
  2844. 2
  2845. 2
  2846. 2
  2847. 2
  2848. 2
  2849. 2
  2850. 2
  2851. 2
  2852. 2
  2853. 2
  2854. Before Euromaidan, Russia started a trade war against Ukraine, forcing Yanukovych to sign a base rental extension agreement that breached Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 disallows foreign military bases after 2017. Read the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 which disallows foreign military bases after 2017. CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on 28 June 1996 Article 17 The location of foreign military bases shall not be permitted on the territory of Ukraine. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17. After 2017, Ukraine's constitution is incompatible with foreign military bases hosting either NATO or CSTO. If Yanukovych didn't sign the military base rental extension, Russia would be kicked out of Crimea. Putin's narrative is FALSE. Putin's pressure caused Yanukovych to make a mistake. --- Every country has the right to operate a biolab and Ukraine did NOT invade another country. Basic pathology blood test requires a bio lab. Saddam's Iraq invaded two other countries i.e. Kuwait and Iran. Remember, Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum exchanged Ukraine's nuclear WMD for security assurances from US, UK, and Russia. France and China signed a watered-down Budapest Memorandum. Budapest Memorandum requires Ukraine to join Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty as part of Ukraine's nuclear WMD disarmament. Tucker is ignorant of Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum. Did you know Australia has similar security assurances like Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum and Australia does NOT have a NATO Article V level guarantee with the US? From 1950 to the 1960s, Australia detonated nuclear bombs as a joint partner with the UK. Australia has many Biolabs for agriculture, animal health, human health and 'etc'.
    2
  2855. 2
  2856. 2
  2857. 2
  2858. 2
  2859. 2
  2860. 2
  2861. 2
  2862. 2
  2863. 2
  2864. 2
  2865. 2
  2866. 2
  2867. 2
  2868. 2
  2869. 2
  2870. 2
  2871. 2
  2872. 2
  2873. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    2
  2874. 2
  2875. 2
  2876. 2
  2877. 2
  2878. 2
  2879. 2
  2880. 2
  2881. 2
  2882. 2
  2883. 2
  2884. 2
  2885. 2
  2886. 2
  2887. 2
  2888. 2
  2889. 2
  2890. 2
  2891. 2
  2892. 2
  2893. 2
  2894. 2
  2895. 2
  2896. 2
  2897. 2
  2898. 2
  2899. 2
  2900. 2
  2901. 2
  2902. 2
  2903. 2
  2904. 2
  2905. 2
  2906. 2
  2907. 2
  2908. 2
  2909. 2
  2910. 2
  2911. 2
  2912. 2
  2913. 2
  2914. 2
  2915. 2
  2916. 2
  2917. 2
  2918. 2
  2919. 2
  2920. 2
  2921. 2
  2922. 2
  2923. 2
  2924. 2
  2925. 2
  2926. 2
  2927. 2
  2928. 2
  2929. 2
  2930. 2
  2931. 2
  2932. 2
  2933. 2
  2934. 2
  2935. 2
  2936. 2
  2937. 2
  2938. 2
  2939. 2
  2940. 2
  2941. 2
  2942. 2
  2943. 2
  2944. 2
  2945. 2
  2946. 2
  2947. 2
  2948. 2
  2949. 2
  2950. 2
  2951. 2
  2952. 2
  2953. 2
  2954. 2
  2955. 2
  2956. 2
  2957. 2
  2958. 2
  2959. 2
  2960. 2
  2961. 2
  2962. 2
  2963. 2
  2964. In the mid-2000s, Colombo (the commercial capital of Sri Lanka) agreed to let Beijing build a new port from scratch in the town of Hambantota, in the south of the island. It wasn’t yet thought of as part of a new Silk Road -- that programme was conceptualizsed by Xi Jinping in 2012 -- but all the ingredients were there. "Chinese funds and engineers are mobilised to build infrastructure outside China, as part of a partnership that was meant to be win-win: this is the very definition of the rationale of the Silk Road," said Jean-François Dufour, economist and director of DCA China-Analysis. The Chinese president integrated the Sri Lankan project into his Silk Road initiative in 2013. But in 2015, financial clouds began gathering over the future of Hambantota’s port, which cost $1.1 billion. Sri Lanka was crumbling under the debt, and was unable to repay the more than $8 billion in loans it had taken from China for several infrastructure projects in the country. Furious, Beijing turned up the heat and threatened to cut off financial support to the island nation if it didn’t quickly find a solution. In December, 2017, after two years of negotiations, Colombo finally agreed to turn over the port to China for 99 years in exchange for the cancellation of its debt. The concession was humiliating for Sri Lanka, while "the opponents of China, like India, painted the entire operation as a deliberate plan to acquire strategic positions in the region," Dufour said. China was suspected of intentionally strangling Colombo with loans at a 6 percent interest rate, which was much higher than the other lenders - such as the World Bank – from which Colombo had previously borrowed. ------ Sri Lanka sided with CHina.
    2
  2965. 2
  2966. 2
  2967. 2
  2968. 2
  2969. 2
  2970. 2
  2971. 2
  2972. 2
  2973. 2
  2974. 2
  2975. 2
  2976. 2
  2977. 2
  2978. 2
  2979.  @edytan.932  Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq
    2
  2980. 2
  2981. 2
  2982. 2
  2983. 2
  2984. 2
  2985. 2
  2986. 2
  2987. 2
  2988. 2
  2989. 2
  2990. 2
  2991. 2
  2992. 2
  2993. 2
  2994. 2
  2995. 2
  2996. 2
  2997. 2
  2998. 2
  2999. 2
  3000. 2
  3001. 2
  3002. 2
  3003. 2
  3004. 2
  3005. 2
  3006. 2
  3007. 2
  3008. 2
  3009. 2
  3010. 2
  3011. 2
  3012. The Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". --------------- In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical.
    2
  3013. 2
  3014. 2
  3015. 2
  3016. 2
  3017. 2
  3018. 2
  3019. 2
  3020. 2
  3021. 2
  3022. 2
  3023. 2
  3024. 2
  3025. 2
  3026. 2
  3027. 2
  3028.  @adarshgarhwal747  From US EIA In 2021, a large share of Europe’s supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) originated in the United States, Qatar, and Russia. Combined, these three countries accounted for almost 70% of Europe’s total LNG imports, according to data by CEDIGAZ. The United States became Europe’s largest source of LNG in 2021, accounting for 26% of all LNG imported by European Union member countries (EU-27) and the United Kingdom (UK), followed by Qatar with 24%, and Russia with 20%. In January 2022, the United States supplied more than half of all LNG imports into Europe for the month. Exports of LNG from the United States to EU-27 and the UK increased from 3.4 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) in November 2021 to 6.5 Bcf/d in January 2022—the most LNG shipped to Europe from the United States on a monthly basis to date, according to the U.S. Department of Energy’s LNG Monthly reports and our own estimates, which are based on LNG shipping data. Rising U.S. LNG exports are the result of both natural gas supply challenges in Europe and the sizable price differences between natural gas produced in the United States and current prices at European trading hubs. Natural gas supply constraints in Europe and the low storage inventories of the past year contributed to recent increases in U.S. LNG exports to Europe. Europe’s natural gas production has been in continuous decline because of production limits on the Groningen field in the Netherlands and declines in the mature fields in the North Sea. To meet demand, Europe’s natural gas imports, particularly from Russia, have increased in recent years. Pipeline flows of natural gas from Russia decreased during 2021. Pipeline receipts from Russia at the three main entry points (Kondratki in Poland, Greifswald in Germany, and Velke Kapusany in Slovakia, which combined account for 14.3 Bcf/d of import pipeline capacity from Russia) averaged 10.7 Bcf/d in 2021, compared with 11.8 Bcf/d in 2020 and 14.1 Bcf/d in 2019, according to data by Refinitiv Eikon. More natural gas delivered by pipeline from Norway, which increased from 10.4 Bcf/d in 2019 and in 2020 to 11.1 Bcf/d in 2021, was not enough to offset reduced pipeline receipts from Russia. Supply challenges in the European market have led to rising regional prices for natural gas. The natural gas spot price at the Title Transfer Facility (TTF) in the Netherlands—the most liquid virtual natural gas hub in Europe—has been trading at all-time high levels. The TTF price averaged $28.52 per million British thermal units (MMBtu) from September 2021 through the first week of February 2022. The TTF price peaked at $60.20/MMBtu on December 21, 2021. Prior to this sharp price increase, the TTF price had averaged $9.28/MMBtu from January through August 2021, $3.28/MMBtu during 2020, $4.45/MMBtu during 2019, and $6.45/MMBtu from 2014 through 2018. Historically, spot natural gas in Europe has traded at prices lower than LNG spot prices in Asia. In recent months, however, natural gas prices in Europe have closely tracked LNG prices in Asia. On some days, the natural gas price in Europe has exceeded the LNG price in Asia, attracting higher volume of flexible LNG supplies to Europe. LNG imports to Europe increased in December 2021 and January 2022, averaging 10.8 Bcf/d and 14.9 Bcf/d, respectively, partly in response to the price at TTF rising above LNG spot prices in Asia.
    2
  3029. Poland is about to complete its new gas pipeline from Norway. The Norway-Poland gas pipeline construction was suspended due to Danish "environmental reasons". From 25th of April 2022 The European Union has announced plans to slash by two-thirds its imports of Russian gas by the end of the year to reduce its dependence on Moscow. ------ The new Norway-Poland gas pipeline. The pipeline is designed to reduce Poland's reliance on Russian gas but construction was halted in May 2019 due to environmental issues. Energinet said it had now received a new environmental permit and it still expects the pipeline to be partially operational from Oct. 1 this year and running at full capacity of up to 10 billion cubic metres from Jan. 1, 2023. The suspension has already delayed the start date by three months. Russia's invasion of Ukraine has triggered worries that Russian gas supplies to Europe could be cut, highlighting the need for diversification of supplies. Construction on two parts of the pipeline has been suspended since 2019 following the rescinding of an environmental permit by a Danish public appeals committee due to concerns over the pipeline's impact on protected mice and bat species. Russia's Gazprom supplies half of Poland's 20 billion cubic meters of gas consumption, but the long-term contract expires at the end of this year and Warsaw doesn't plan to renew it. Poland aims to replace these supplies with shipments via Baltic Pipe. A natural gas pipeline linking Poland to a liquefied natural gas terminal in Lithuania, called GIPL, will open on May 1, Lithuania said on Monday, earlier than the scheduled mid-2022 start.
    2
  3030. 2
  3031. 2
  3032. 2
  3033. 2
  3034. 2
  3035. 2
  3036. 2
  3037. 2
  3038. 2
  3039. 2
  3040. 2
  3041. 2
  3042. 2
  3043. 2
  3044. 2
  3045. 2
  3046. 2
  3047. 2
  3048. 2
  3049. 2
  3050. 2
  3051. 2
  3052. 2
  3053. 2
  3054. 2
  3055. 2
  3056. 2
  3057. 2
  3058. 2
  3059. 2
  3060. 2
  3061. 2
  3062. 2
  3063. 2
  3064. 2
  3065. 2
  3066. 2
  3067. 2
  3068. 2
  3069. 2
  3070. 2
  3071. 2
  3072. 2
  3073. 2
  3074. 2
  3075. 2
  3076. 2
  3077. 2
  3078. 2
  3079. 2
  3080. EU has a “mutual defense clause" article 42.7 of the Treaty of the European Union (TEU). NATO’s Article 5 can be seen as similar to article 42.7 TEU. NATO’s Article 5 can't be used when two or more NATO members are at war with each other. Invoking Article 42.7 TEU might bring EU's F-35A Block 3F fleet into the mix e.g. F-35 fleets of Italy and Netherlands. Norway is not an EU member. UK will soon be out of EU, but UK has bases in Cyprus. https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/09/23/pax-mediterranea-italy-turkey-france-oil-european-union/ France and Italy join forces against Turkey. Franco-Italian energy cooperation already established. There's a gas pipeline EastMed project from Israel to Greece via southern Cyprus. Israel has open the door for Turkey on joining EastMed energy cooperation. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-greece-cyprus-israel-pipeline-idUSKBN1Z10R5 EastMed project has Israel, Cyprus, Greece, and Italy. https://www.neweurope.eu/article/eu-reiterates-support-for-eastmed-pipe-urges-turkey-to-respect-international-law/ EU supports the EastMed project. From https://theintercept.com/2020/02/06/congress-exxon-mobil-eastmed-pipeline-cyprus/ US Congress backs Exxon Mobil's EastMed project. When there are hydrocarbon fuels, the US will be interested. U.S. military brought the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit to Limassol, Cyprus, on the USS Iwo Jima (Wasp-class LHD) as Exxon Mobil commenced exploratory drilling in the region. USS Iwo Jima (Wasp-class LHD) has 20 F-35B. Noble Energy (Chevron, USA) and Qatar Petroleum also supports the EastMed project.
    2
  3081. 2
  3082. 2
  3083. 2
  3084. 2
  3085. 2
  3086. 2
  3087. 2
  3088. 2
  3089. 2
  3090. 2
  3091. 2
  3092.  @slatsgrobneck7515  The United States remained Europe’s top supplier of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the first 3 months of 2021 as it continued to gain market share at the expense of Russia and Qatar, Europe’s second- and third-largest sources of LNG, according to the EU Commission’s latest European Gas Market Report. The US supplied 24% (4.2 Bcm) of the EU’s overall LNG imports (17 Bcm in Q1 2021); Russia placed second at 21% (3.7 Bcm); and Qatar was third at 18% (3.1 Bcm), the EU Commission reported in early July. When compared to Q4 2020, the US picked up 2% market share from January to March this year, while Russia bested Qatar to become Europe’s second-largest LNG supplier. Nigeria placed fourth, followed by Algeria and Trinidad and Tobago. A review of EU Commission reports dating back to 2019 reveals a steady quarter-to-quarter decline in Europe’s LNG purchases while it also documents the growing rivalry between the US and Russia, Qatar’s fall from dominance, and the emergence of the US as Europe’s top LNG supplier starting Q4 2019. The EU is the world’s third-largest LNG market, though its imports amounted to only about half that of Japan (36 Bcm) and China (32 Bcm) in Q1 2021. European gas consumption rose 7.6% to 132 Bcm in Q1 based on a year-on-year comparison. The commission noted that demand for gas as fuel to generate electricity rose 3.4%, also year-on-year (increasing by 4.9 TWh.) In terms of gas deliveries overall, including pipeline gas, Russia remained the leading gas supplier to Europe (45% of all imports) with the Nord Stream 1 pipeline across the Baltic Sea as its most important supply route. ---- Russia itself doesn't have a US-level consumption.
    2
  3093. 2
  3094. 2
  3095. 2
  3096. 2
  3097. 2
  3098. 2
  3099. 2
  3100. 2
  3101. 2
  3102.  @robertmarmaduke9721  False. The government of the Republic of China, led by the Kuomintang, retreated to Taiwan Island in 1949 after losing the Chinese Civil War with the Communist Party of China. At that time, the Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of Communist Rebellion was enforced and largely restricted civil and political rights including voting rights of the Taiwanese people. In the eight elections starting from the 1948 Republic of China presidential election in Nanking (later known as Nanjing) to the 1990 Taiwan presidential election, the President was indirectly elected by the National Assembly first elected in 1947 and which had never been reelected in its entirety since. Similarly, the Legislative Yuan also had not been reelected as a whole since 1948. The provincial Governor and municipal Mayors were appointed by the central government. Direct elections were only held for local governments at the county level, and for legislators at the provincial level. In addition, the Martial law in Taiwan also prohibited most forms of opposition. From the 1990s, a series of democratic reforms were implemented in Taiwan. The Additional Articles of the Constitution were adopted to grant full civil and political rights to the Taiwanese people (officially the people of the Free area of the Republic of China). Under the Additional Articles, the President are to be elected by popular vote and all seats in the national parliament are to be reelected. Following the reforms, the first parliamentary elections on Taiwan were held in 1991 for the National Assembly and 1992 for the Legislative Yuan. The first election for provincial Governors and municipality Mayors was held in 1994. Most importantly, Taiwan held the first direct election of the President and Vice President in 1996. The provincial government was reconstructed as a subsidiary of the central government in 1998 and elections for governor and provincial legislators were terminated. The National Assembly ceased to be convened regularly in 2000 and was abolished in 2005. The number of members of the Legislative Yuan was reduced to 113 from 2008.
    2
  3103. 2
  3104. 2
  3105. 2
  3106. 2
  3107. 2
  3108. 2
  3109. 2
  3110. 2
  3111. 2
  3112. 2
  3113. 2
  3114. 2
  3115. 2
  3116. 2
  3117. 2
  3118. 2
  3119. 2
  3120.  @stephenburrows4250  That's bullshit. Why continue posting this nonsense, even Saab has agreed that F-35A is not too bad? http://i328.photobucket.com/albums/l327/encia/F35/F-35AfromSaab_zps6b92ab35.jpg Original source (non-English) http://suomenkuvalehti.fi/jutut/kotimaa/suomella-vahvat-ilmavoimat-mutta-kuinka-kauan/ Frisian Flag 2012 exercises in Holland, Finnish F-18Cs gets 100 kills and 6 loses against Eurofighter (Germany, UK), Polish new F-16 and older F-16 planes (Norway, Belgium) and Gripen (Swedish) Finland's F-18C has 16:1 kill ratio over Germany/UK's Eurofighter, Poland's F-16C Block 52+ and Norway/Belgium's F-16A MLU and Sweden's Gripen. http://nettsteder.regjeringen.no/kampfly/2015/11/20/a-fly-f-35-erfaringer-fra-den-forste-uka/ More F-16 vs F-35 from Norwegian pilot. I quote Overall, flying the F-35 reminds me a bit of flying the F/A-18 Hornet, but with an important difference: It has been fitted with a turbo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3b-b762QRY Super Hornet's high angle of attack with minimum turn radius advantage holding its own against F-15's high energy turn rate advantage dogfight example. Replace Super Hornet with F-35A Block 3F with superior acceleration (beats EuroFIghter and Hornets) and superior roll rates. http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2009/07/i-flew-supersonic-barely-at-th/ F-35C has 300 degrees per second roll rate. F-35A roll rate: 300 deg/sec. Video proof. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qceZALofOcg&feature=youtu.be&t=1m15s http://theaviationist.com/2015/05/01/aileron-roll-in-t-346a/ According to most reports a Rafale features a maximum roll rate of 270 deg/s, the Eurofighter Typhoon is able of around 250 deg/s, the F/A-18E Super Hornet has a maximum roll rate of 120 deg/s whereas the F-16 can roll at 240 deg/s. F-35A Block 3F has 9G with 50 degrees angle of attack. For Rafale http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/flight-test-dassault-rafale-rampant-rafale-334383/ The DFCS is a "g" demand system with +9.0g/29° angle of attack (AoA) limit in air-to-air mode and +5.5g/20° AoA limit in both of the two air-to-ground/heavy stores modes (ST1 and ST2) to cater for forward or aft centre of gravity For F-35A, http://www.f-16.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=15013&start=210 Article copied beyond Aviation Week paywall. So it got stuck at 60 or 70 deg. alpha, and it was as happy as could be https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474667015332274?via%3Dihub The JAS 39 Gripen is a 26 degree angle of attack aircraft for the light external store configurations and 20 degrees for the most heavy external store configurations. The variation of angle of attack with roll stick position is used to give roll command priority, when the pilot demands roll rate. I'll debate you.
    2
  3121. 2
  3122. 2
  3123. 2
  3124. 2
  3125. 2
  3126. 2
  3127. 2
  3128. 2
  3129. 2
  3130. 2
  3131. 2
  3132. 2
  3133. 2
  3134. 2
  3135. 2
  3136. 2
  3137. 2
  3138. 2
  3139. 2
  3140. 2
  3141. 2
  3142. 2
  3143. 2
  3144. 2
  3145. 2
  3146. 2
  3147. 2
  3148. 2
  3149. 2
  3150. 2
  3151. 2
  3152. 2
  3153. 2
  3154. 2
  3155. 2
  3156. 2
  3157. 2
  3158. 2
  3159. 2
  3160. 2
  3161. 2
  3162. 2
  3163. 2
  3164. 2
  3165. 2
  3166. 2
  3167. 2
  3168. 2
  3169. 2
  3170. 2
  3171. 2
  3172. 2
  3173. 2
  3174. 2
  3175. 2
  3176. 2
  3177. 2
  3178. 2
  3179. 2
  3180. 2
  3181.  @sergeypopov8279  Russian armed Iraq invaded Kuwait. Iraq's territorial integrity was kept intact. Russian armed Libya invaded Kuwait. Libya's territorial integrity was kept intact. Fact: The US didn't land grab Yugoslavia's breakaways. Russia land grabs Ukraine's 5 Oblast territories. The Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". --------------- In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical. USSR's proxy attempted to remove Chile's check-and-balance Congress system. USSR's proxy attempted to concentrate political power into a single entity (individual and political party). The US has no problems with the Swedish-style nanny market led-socialism that is practiced in the CANZUK and Nordic groups.
    2
  3182. 2
  3183. 2
  3184. 2
  3185. 2
  3186. 2
  3187. 2
  3188. 2
  3189. 2
  3190. 2
  3191. 2
  3192. 2
  3193. 2
  3194. 2
  3195. 2
  3196. 2
  3197. 2
  3198. 2
  3199. 2
  3200. 2
  3201. 2
  3202.  @katiearbuckle9017  >it's true we did lie about Iraq in the beginning Nope. Iraq's WMD issue is not yet resolved since Kurdish victims are winning their course case against European entities who supplied chemicals for Saddam's WMDs. 1. On 24 April 2013, the district court of The Hague sentenced Dutch businessman Frans van Anraat to payment of damages to the victims of mustard-gas attacks in Iraq and Iran in the 1980s 2. Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq
    2
  3203. 2
  3204. 2
  3205. 2
  3206. 2
  3207. 2
  3208. 2
  3209. 2
  3210. 2
  3211. 2
  3212. 2
  3213. 2
  3214. 2
  3215. 2
  3216. 2
  3217. 2
  3218. 2
  3219. 2
  3220. 2
  3221.  @personaa422  FACTS: Post-WW2 Japan vs Eastern European results speak for themselves. For post-WW2 Japan, MacArthur also executed land reform by shifting significant wealthy landlord's lands to the workers with private land title transfers. MacArthur = land reform transfers that included private land title transfers to the workers. From http://www.crosscurrents.hawaii.edu/content.aspx?lang=eng&site=japan&theme=work&subtheme=AGRIC&unit=JWORK098# Land Reform in Postwar Japan As part of the democratization of Japan after World War II, Japanese leaders and Occupation authorities worked together to carry out land reform. It is regarded as one of the most successful of the Occupation-era reforms, and has become the model for land reform in other countries. The purpose of land reform was to reduce the wide gap between absentee landlords who owned agricultural land but did not farm it themselves, and tenant farmers who rented the land in exchange for giving the landlord a high proportion of the crop. The land reform laws were intended to limit the amount of farm land one household could own to about the amount of land that one family could farm themselves, without outside labor. The government forced absentee landlords to sell all their land to the government. Farmers were allowed to own a small amount of farm land that they could rent out to others ( 2.5 acres or one hectare in most parts of Japan, and 10 acres or 4 hectares in Hokkaido), and had to sell any excess to the government. The government then sold this land, usually to the tenant who had been farming it. The result greatly improved the living conditions of farmers. Idealogical basis: A family's land ownership. The West has its own idealogy on land reform with family unit and private ownership as its core idealogy. VS Marxist = land reform transfer to the state, no private land title transfer to the workers. --- The debate about left-wing or right-wing is an attempt to censor debate on the ACTUAL implementation details.
    2
  3222. 2
  3223. 2
  3224. 2
  3225. 2
  3226. 2
  3227. 2
  3228. >Libya On 16 August 2003, Libya formally admitted responsibility for Pan Am Flight 103 (Lockabie bombing) in a letter presented to the president of the United Nations Security Council. "On 10 March 2011, France was the first country in the world to recognise the National Transitional Council as the legitimate government of Libya". >Iraq Iraq invaded Kuwait. Iraq's top oil exports countries from Jan to Jun 2020 1st, China! 29 million tonnes <---- LOL 2nd, India, 23 million tonnes 3rd, EU, 8 million tonnes 4th, South Korea, 6 million tonnes 5th, Turkey, 4 million tonnes with an upwards trend 5th, USA, 4 million tonnes with a downwards trend Report: Saudi Arabia Presses U.S. on Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Date: January 19, 1992 From AP NEWS NEW YORK (AP) _ Saudi Arabia is pressuring the Bush administration to secretly arm and give intelligence to Iraqi opposition forces so they can work to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a newspaper reported Sunday. The Saudis want the United States to give arms and intelligence to Kurdish rebels in north Iraq, Shiite Muslim fighters in the south and Sunni Muslim opposition forces in central Iraq, the Times said, quoting U.S. and allied officials it didn’t name. ------ Sheikhdom of Kuwait Kuwait was founded in 1613 AD as a fishing village known as Grane (Kureyn). The region soon came under the rule of the Bani Khalid Emirate in 1670 after the expulsion of the Ottomans from Eastern Arabia (Lahsa Eyalet) by Barrack bin Ghurayr, Emir of the Bani Khalid, who successfully besieged the Ottoman governor Umar Pasha who surrendered and gave up his rule as the fourth Ottoman governor of al-Hasa. In 1752, Kuwait became independent after an agreement between the Sheikh of Kuwait and the Emir of Bani Khalid in which Bani Khalid recognised Sabah I bin Jaber's independent rule over Kuwait and in exchange Kuwait would not ally itself or support the enemies of Bani Khalid or interfere in the internal affairs of Bani Khalid in any way.
    2
  3229. 2
  3230. 2
  3231. 2
  3232. 2
  3233. 2
  3234. 2
  3235. 2
  3236. 2
  3237. 2
  3238. 2
  3239. 2
  3240. 2
  3241. 2
  3242. 2
  3243. 2
  3244. 2
  3245. 2
  3246. 2
  3247. 2
  3248. 2
  3249. 2
  3250. 2
  3251. 2
  3252. 2
  3253. 2
  3254. 2
  3255. 2
  3256. 2
  3257. 2
  3258. 2
  3259. 2
  3260. 2
  3261. 2
  3262. 2
  3263. 2
  3264. 2
  3265. 2
  3266. 2
  3267. 2
  3268. 2
  3269. 2
  3270. 2
  3271. 2
  3272. 2
  3273. 2
  3274. 2
  3275. 2
  3276. 2
  3277. 2
  3278. 2
  3279. 2
  3280. 2
  3281.  @vlad_47  1. Imperial Japan army in northern China is nearly useless for Imperial Japan's martime empire. Imperial Japan's oil was supplied from the Indonesia and Malaysia i.e. main reason for war against the US. 2. Imperial Japan army has inferior tanks which is far inferior to M4 Sherman or T-34 tanks. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Manchuria#Combatant_forces Imperial Japan's land forces in China Kwantung Army had over 700,000 men Manchukuo: 170,000[1]–200,000 troops[5] Mengjiang: 44,000 troops The Kwantung Army had over 700,000 men in twenty-five divisions (including two tank divisions) and six Independent Mixed Brigades. These contained over 1,215 armored vehicles (mostly armored cars and light tanks), 6,700 artillery pieces (mostly light), and 1,800 aircraft (mostly trainers and obsolete types). However, the Kwantung Army was far below its authorized strength; most of its heavy equipment and all of its best military units had transferred to the Pacific Theater over the previous three years to contend with the advance of American forces. By 1945 the Kwantung Army contained a large number of raw recruits and conscripts, with generally obsolete, light, or otherwise limited equipment. Almost all of the tanks were early 1930s models such as the Type 95 Ha-Go and Type 89 I-Go, the anti-tank units only possessed Type 1 37 mm anti-tank guns that were ineffective against Soviet armor, and the infantry had very few machine-guns and no anti-materiel rifles or submachine guns. As a result, the Japanese forces in Manchuria and Korea had essentially been reduced to a light-infantry counter-insurgency force with limited mobility and limited ability to fight a conventional land war against a coordinated enemy. In fact, only six of the Kwantung Army's divisions existed prior to January 1945. Accordingly, the Japanese regarded none of the Kwantung Army's units as combat ready, with some units being declared less than 15% ready 3. USSR entered a land war against Imperial Japan on 9–20 August 1945 which is too late when Imperal Japan's navy was already destroyed e.g. Yamato was sunk on the 7th of April 1945
    2
  3282. 2
  3283. 2
  3284. 2
  3285. 2
  3286. 2
  3287. 2
  3288. 2
  3289. 2
  3290. 2
  3291. 2
  3292. 2
  3293. 2
  3294. 2
  3295. 2
  3296. 2
  3297. 2
  3298. 2
  3299. 2
  3300. 2
  3301. 2
  3302. 2
  3303. 2
  3304. 2
  3305. 2
  3306. 2
  3307. 2
  3308. 2
  3309. 2
  3310. 2
  3311. 2
  3312. 2
  3313. 2
  3314. 2
  3315. 2
  3316. 2
  3317. 2
  3318. 2
  3319. 2
  3320. 2
  3321. 2
  3322. 2
  3323. 2
  3324. 2
  3325. 2
  3326. 2
  3327. 2
  3328. 2
  3329. 2
  3330. 2
  3331. 2
  3332. 2
  3333. 2
  3334. 2
  3335. 2
  3336. 2
  3337. 2
  3338. 2
  3339. 2
  3340. 2
  3341. 2
  3342. 2
  3343. 2
  3344. 2
  3345. 2
  3346. 2
  3347. 2
  3348. 2
  3349. 2
  3350. 2
  3351. 2
  3352. 2
  3353. 2
  3354. 2
  3355. 2
  3356. 2
  3357. 2
  3358. 2
  3359. 2
  3360. 2
  3361. 2
  3362. 2
  3363. 2
  3364. 2
  3365. 2
  3366. 2
  3367. 2
  3368. 2
  3369. 2
  3370. 2
  3371. 2
  3372. 2
  3373. 2
  3374. 2
  3375. 2
  3376. 2
  3377. 2
  3378. 2
  3379. 2
  3380. 2
  3381. 2
  3382. 2
  3383. 2
  3384. 2
  3385. 2
  3386. 2
  3387. 2
  3388. 2
  3389. 2
  3390. 2
  3391. 2
  3392. 2
  3393. 2
  3394. 2
  3395. 2
  3396. 2
  3397. 2
  3398. 2
  3399. 2
  3400. 2
  3401. 2
  3402. 2
  3403. 2
  3404. 2
  3405.  @mouradbelkas598  Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government (since its formation) had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq. -------------- Again, Iraq invaded Kuwait and Iran i.e. those who live by the sword will die by the sword. Ukraine did NOT invade another country.
    2
  3406. 2
  3407. 2
  3408. 2
  3409. 2
  3410. 2
  3411. 2
  3412. 2
  3413. 2
  3414. 2
  3415.  @ransertu7630  Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government (since its formation) had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq
    2
  3416. 2
  3417. 2
  3418. 2
  3419. 2
  3420. 2
  3421. 2
  3422. 2
  3423. 2
  3424. 2
  3425. 2
  3426. 2
  3427. 2
  3428. 2
  3429. 2
  3430. 2
  3431. 2
  3432. 2
  3433. 2
  3434. 2
  3435. 2
  3436. 2
  3437. 2
  3438. 2
  3439. 2
  3440. 2
  3441. 2
  3442. 2
  3443. Joao Paulo Ballico, US destroyed Imperial Japan. USA production is more than 4 times since US was only nation to mass produced aircraft carriers. Germany Tiger I tank's 1,347 units x 44 tons = 59,268 tons Tiger II tank has 492 units x 68 tons = 33,456 tons Panther tank has 6000 units x 44 tons = 264,000 tons Panzer IV has 8,553 unit x 25 tons = 213,825 tons Total: 570549 tons Czech's Panzer 38(t) has 1414 units x 10 tons = 14140 tons USA M26 tanks has 2,212 units x 44 tons = 97,328 tons M26 has 90 mm gun. M4 tanks has 49,234 units x 33 tons = 1,624,722, Russian T34 tanks has similar number. M10 tank destroyer has 6,406 units x 29 tons = 185,774 tons M18 tank destroyer has 2,507 units x 39 tons = 97,773 tons M36 tank destroyer has 2,324 units x 29 tons = 67,396 tons M36 has 90 mm gun. Sub-Total: 2,072,993 tons M4 Sherman Firefly (UK) has 2,200 units x 35 tons = 77,000 tons. Firefly takes on Tiger I and Panther tanks. US has both quality (M26) and numbers (M4). Significant amount of US Army's tonnage was against German army. US has the following aircraft carrier production 24 Essex-class fleet carriers with 90 to 110 aircraft each. 650,400 tons for Essex-class. 21 Commencement Bay class with 228,900 tons 50 Casablanca-class with 390,000 tons. 45 Bogue-class with 747,900 tons 3 Yorktown-class fleet carriers with 59,400 tons Sub-Total: 3,798,645 tons Modern day USN aircraft carrier tonnage is just about 1,460,000 tons. Significant amount of USN's tonnage was against Japanese navy. WW2 UK has similar aircraft carrier builds as Imperial Japan i.e. around 10 to 11 units. Not including UK, US and Canada other surface combat ships e.g. destroyers, heavy cruisers, battleships and 'etc'. Grand Total: 5,871,638 tons For US, that's already 10.3X times over Germany's iron/steel tonnage extract/production. WW2 Russian navy is small. WW2 German navy is small. Both Canada and USA has the advantage of the entire North American continent on raw metal and oil resources. European mainland is raw resource poor, hence the reason for Hitler wanting Russian lands.
    2
  3444. 2
  3445. 2
  3446. 2
  3447. 2
  3448. 2
  3449. 2
  3450. 2
  3451. 2
  3452. 2
  3453. 2
  3454. 2
  3455. 2
  3456. 2
  3457. 2
  3458. 2
  3459. 2
  3460. 2
  3461. 2
  3462. 2
  3463. 2
  3464. 2
  3465. 2
  3466. 2
  3467. 2
  3468. 2
  3469. 2
  3470. 2
  3471. 2
  3472. 2
  3473. 2
  3474. 2
  3475. 2
  3476. 2
  3477. 2
  3478. 2
  3479. 2
  3480. 2
  3481. 2
  3482. @David Siitherism Unlike Bernie, FDR didn't prise communism. AOC "Green New Deal" is a heavy command economy nearly like communism. http://theconversation.com/why-biologics-were-such-a-big-deal-in-the-trans-pacific-partnership-48595 During Obama administration, Australia's center-right wing federal government has identified US "data-exclusivity-medications" condition as the killer to their universal health care system. Aussie's medical patent system also supports the private insurance system's cost controls. Australian's nanny state difference vs Communism is the Aussie system enforces the ideal healthy market competition to cause downward pressure on health costs for both single-payer universal health care and private systems. https://www.thelocal.dk/20151101/danish-pm-in-us-denmark-is-not-socialist Danish PM in US: Denmark is not socialist https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_of_Economic_Freedom Many Nordic and CANZUK "nanny" states beat US on Economic Freedom index scores and thump communist states. Australia's nanny state system tumps Cuba. US already has a single-payer system via VA system, but it's gimped by monopolistic friendly patent laws and inefficient administration with high overheads. A Nordic nanny-state model combines life-critical welfare with a robust market lead economy. To quote Winston Churchill's centrist position The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings. The inherent virtue of Socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.” —House of Commons, 22 October 1945. "Helping the poor among us" idealogy has existed before Marxist communism.
    2
  3483. 2
  3484. 2
  3485. 2
  3486. 2
  3487. 2
  3488. 2
  3489. 2
  3490. 2
  3491. 2
  3492. 2
  3493. 2
  3494. 2
  3495. 2
  3496. 2
  3497. 2
  3498. 2
  3499. 2
  3500. 2
  3501. 2
  3502. 2
  3503. 2
  3504. 2
  3505. 2
  3506. 2
  3507. 2
  3508. 2
  3509. 2
  3510. 2
  3511. 2
  3512. 2
  3513. 2
  3514. 2
  3515. 2
  3516. 2
  3517. 2
  3518. 2
  3519. 2
  3520. 2
  3521. 2
  3522. 2
  3523. 2
  3524. 2
  3525. 2
  3526. 2
  3527. 2
  3528. 2
  3529. 2
  3530. 2
  3531. 2
  3532. 2
  3533. 2
  3534. 2
  3535. 2
  3536. 2
  3537. 2
  3538. 2
  3539. 2
  3540. 2
  3541. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited. ----- Paul Keating is stupid.
    2
  3542. 2
  3543. 2
  3544. 2
  3545. 2
  3546. 2
  3547. 2
  3548. 2
  3549. 2
  3550. 2
  3551. 2
  3552. 2
  3553. 2
  3554. 2
  3555. 2
  3556. 2
  3557. 2
  3558. 2
  3559. 2
  3560. 2
  3561. 2
  3562. 2
  3563. 2
  3564. 2
  3565. 2
  3566. 2
  3567. 2
  3568. 2
  3569. 2
  3570. 2
  3571.  @lordmike9384  The difference, the US has LNG interest in Poland and US is NOT resource poor UK, France and Germany. ------- The United States remained Europe’s top supplier of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the first 3 months of 2021 as it continued to gain market share at the expense of Russia and Qatar, Europe’s second- and third-largest sources of LNG, according to the EU Commission’s latest European Gas Market Report. The US supplied 24% (4.2 Bcm) of the EU’s overall LNG imports (17 Bcm in Q1 2021); Russia placed second at 21% (3.7 Bcm); and Qatar was third at 18% (3.1 Bcm), the EU Commission reported in early July. When compared to Q4 2020, the US picked up 2% market share from January to March this year, while Russia bested Qatar to become Europe’s second-largest LNG supplier. Nigeria placed fourth, followed by Algeria and Trinidad and Tobago. A review of EU Commission reports dating back to 2019 reveals a steady quarter-to-quarter decline in Europe’s LNG purchases while it also documents the growing rivalry between the US and Russia, Qatar’s fall from dominance, and the emergence of the US as Europe’s top LNG supplier starting Q4 2019. The EU is the world’s third-largest LNG market, though its imports amounted to only about half that of Japan (36 Bcm) and China (32 Bcm) in Q1 2021. European gas consumption rose 7.6% to 132 Bcm in Q1 based on a year-on-year comparison. The commission noted that demand for gas as fuel to generate electricity rose 3.4%, also year-on-year (increasing by 4.9 TWh.) --------- You can't handle it when Russia is not the only energy superpower with interest.
    2
  3572. 2
  3573. 2
  3574. 2
  3575. 2
  3576.  @lordmike9384  > omg you're contradicting yourself. uk definitely had the power to attack germany with airpower and didn't. FALSE, Approximate distance UK's London to Germany's Dusseldorf = 479 km one-way direction Approximate distance UK's London to Germany's Frankfurt = 613 km one-way direction Supermarine Spitfire's range with external tank = 1826.605 km or 913 km combat radius. Hawker Hurricane's range = 970 km or 485 km combat radius (defensive fighter, the backbone of RAF). F-16s has a similar short legs issue as Hawker Hurricane's. F-16 is designed as defensive fighter aircraft. Supermarine Spitfire has the range endurance to cover British/French armies over Belgium and most of France, but they are few in numbers when compared to Hawker Hurricanes. For the bomber escort missions, most of RAF's fighter fleet with Hawker Hurricanes does NOT have long-range escort bomber capability! Prior to P-51 Mustang, RAF bomber escort via Spitfires can cover most of France and into Germany's northwest areas around Cologne and Bonn. The statement "uk definitely had the power to attack germany with airpower and didn't." is FALSE since most of RAF's fleet is made up of air defense fighter Hawker Hurricanes. LOL January 1942 (for RAF) US's P-51D Mustang's range with external tanks = 2,660 km or 1,330 km combat radius. F-35A has a 1407 km combat radius (Israeli info) with just internal fuel tanks. The P-51 Mustang was a solution to the need for an effective bomber escort. P-51 fighters can escort bombers anywhere Germany! and into Poland's Warsaw.
    2
  3577. 2
  3578. 2
  3579. 2
  3580. 2
  3581. 2
  3582. 2
  3583. 2
  3584. 2
  3585. 2
  3586. 2
  3587. 2
  3588. 2
  3589. 2
  3590. 2
  3591. 2
  3592. 2
  3593. 2
  3594. 2
  3595. 2
  3596. 2
  3597. 2
  3598. 2
  3599. 2
  3600. 2
  3601. 2
  3602. 2
  3603. 2
  3604. 2
  3605. 2
  3606. 2
  3607. 2
  3608. 2
  3609. 2
  3610. 2
  3611.  @Shenzhou.  > Xinjiang was part of China even before Jesus Christ himself was born FALSE. China's multiple languages are echoes of the past separate individual kingdoms. The earliest inhabitants of the region encompassing modern day Xinjiang were genetically of Ancient North Eurasian and Northeast Asian origin, with later geneflow from during the Bronze Age linked to the expansion of early Indo-Europeans. These population dynamics gave rise to a heterogeneous demographic makeup. Iron Age samples from Xinjiang show intensified levels of admixture between Steppe pastoralists and northeast Asians, with northern and eastern Xinjiang showing more affinities with northeast Asians, and southern Xinjiang showing more affinity with central Asians _Between 2009 and 2015, the remains of 92 individuals in the Xiaohe Cemetery were analyzed for Y chromosome and mitochondrial DNA markers. Genetic analyses of the mummies showed that the paternal lineages of the Xiaohe people were of European[42] origin, while the maternal lineages of the early population were diverse, featuring both East Eurasian and West Eurasian lineages, as well as a small number of Indian lineages. Over time, the west Eurasian maternal lineages were gradually replaced by east Eurasian maternal lineages. _ Nomadic tribes such as the Yuezhi, Saka and Wusun were probably part of the migration of Indo-European speakers who had settled in Western Central Asia long before the Xiongnu and Han Chinese. By the time the Han dynasty under Emperor Wu (r. 141–87 BC) wrested the western Tarim Basin away from its previous overlords (the Xiongnu), it was inhabited by various peoples who included the Indo-European-speaking Tocharians in Turfan and Kucha, the Saka peoples centered in the Shule Kingdom and the Kingdom of Khotan, the various Tibeto-Burmese groups (especially people related to the Qiang) as well as the Han Chinese people.[48] Some linguists posit that the Tocharian language had high amounts of influence from Paleosiberian languages,[49] such as Uralic and Yeniseian languages. YOUR NARRATIVE IS FALSE.
    2
  3612. 2
  3613. 2
  3614. 2
  3615. 2
  3616. 2
  3617. 2
  3618. 2
  3619.  @yggdrasil9039  Most recently, Bjørn Nyland had an opportunity to test the entry-level Made-in-China (MIC) Tesla Model 3 SR+ (currently named Tesla Model 3 RWD) with LFP (lithium iron phosphate) lithium-ion batteries. LFP battery chemistry is known for its limitation of charging at low temperatures (especially below 0°C). We already know that its winter range (at 1°C) is noticeably lower than in the Summer. But it was a test with a normal battery temperature (roughly 25°C). The next episode is about how the cold weather affect the Tesla Model 3. The car was left intentionally with a low state-of-charge and the battery had only a few degrees °C in the morning (outside temperature was 2°C). We can treat it as the worst-case scenario. The EV battery packs are thermally isolated so they maintain temperature quite long. The general operation of the car is surprisingly good and it appears to accelerate normally Regenerative braking is ok (it can reach substantial levels - up to a few times higher than continuous fast charging). However, the fast charging is significantly limited when the battery is cold. After plugging-in, the car was able to barely reach 20 kW at about 11% state-of-charge (SOC), and then it decreased to an even lower level, like 13 kW (after 10 minutes). This proves that the battery temperature is crucial for charging. Fortunately, the pre-conditioning of the battery (heating) ahead of fast charging (car feature), combined with driving (additional heat losses and heat scavenging) improves the charging performance relatively quickly. The later test at 8% SOC with 25°C battery temperature resulted in charging power of 111 kW (and it dropped to 90 kW after a while). The conclusion is to avoid leaving the cars in the cold, disconnected from a charging point, and if that happens, maybe start conditioning immediately to achieve best performance and fast charging capability.
    2
  3620. 2
  3621. 2
  3622. 2
  3623. 2
  3624. 2
  3625. 2
  3626. 2
  3627. 2
  3628. 2
  3629. 2
  3630. 2
  3631. 2
  3632. 2
  3633. 2
  3634. 2
  3635. 2
  3636. 2
  3637. 2
  3638. 2
  3639. 2
  3640. 2
  3641. 2
  3642. 2
  3643. 2
  3644. 2
  3645. 2
  3646. 2
  3647. 2
  3648. 2
  3649. 2
  3650. 2
  3651. 2
  3652. 2
  3653. 2
  3654. 2
  3655. 2
  3656. 2
  3657. 2
  3658. 2
  3659. 2
  3660.  @chrisyoung9194  >about profits for their mates at Woodside..Exxon and Chevron... That's a FALSE narrative. More than 99% of Australian LNG has been exported to Asia, mainly China, Japan, and South Korea. Australia’s Top 5 Oil and Gas Companies. 1. BHP Billiton Limited. The petroleum segment currently represents around 13% of BHP’s total business. 2. Woodside Petroleum Limited. Australia’s largest operator of oil and gas production, Woodside employs over 3,000 people and is headquartered in Perth. WA state has a Labor government. 3. Origin Energy Limited. Origin specialise in exploring, producing, generating, and retailing energy from their assets based in Queensland and the Northern Territory. Both Queensland and Northern Territory have Labor governments. 4. Santos (South Australian Northern Territory Oil Search) Limited. An independent oil and gas producer, it produces oil and gas from five central assets, located in Queensland (Labor government), the Northern Territory (Labor government); Papua New Guinea, Western Australia (Labor government), and New South Wales (LNP government). 5. Ampol Limited (Australian Petroleum). At its oil refinery in Lytton in Brisbane (Queensland Labor government), Ampol manufactures fuels including liquefied petroleum gas, petrol, diesel, jet fuel as well as lubricants, greases, and other specialty products. Chevron Corporation, the owner of the Caltex trademark, has given the notice to terminate the license agreement for use of the Caltex brand in Australia.
    2
  3661.  @robertmarmaduke9721  Following a shipwreck of a Ryukyuan vessel on the southeastern tip of Taiwan in winter of 1871, in which the heads of 54 crew members were taken by the aboriginal Taiwanese Paiwan people in the Mudan incident, the Japanese sought to use this incident as a pretext to have the Qing formally acknowledge Japanese sovereignty over the Ryukyu Islands as Japanese territory and to test reactions to potential expansion into Taiwan. According to records from Japanese documents, Mao Changxi [zh] and Dong Xun [zh], the Qing ministers at Zongli Yamen who handled the complaints from Japanese envoy Yanagihara Sakimitsu [ja], replied first that they had heard only of a massacre of Ryukyuans, not of Japanese, and quickly noted that Ryukyu was under Chinese suzerainty, and therefore this issue was not Japan's business. In addition, the governor-general of the Qing province Fujian had rescued the survivors of the massacre and returned them safely to Ryukyu. The Qing authorities explained that there were two kinds of aborigines on Taiwan: those governed by the Qing, and those unnaturalized "raw barbarians ... beyond the reach of Qing government and customs." They indirectly hinted that foreigners traveling in those areas settled by indigenous people must exercise caution. After the Yanagihara-Yamen interview, the Japanese took their explanation to mean that the Qing government had not opposed Japan's claims to sovereignty over the Ryukyu Islands, disclaimed any jurisdiction over Aboriginal Taiwanese, and had indeed consented to Japan's expedition to Taiwan.[51] The Qing dynasty made it clear to the Japanese that Taiwan was definitely within Qing jurisdiction, even though part of that island's aboriginal population was not yet under the influence of Chinese culture. The Qing also pointed to similar cases all over the world where an aboriginal population within a national boundary was not completely subjugated by the dominant culture of that country. The Japanese nevertheless launched an expedition to Mutan village with a force of 3600 soldiers in 1874. The number of killed Paiwan was about thirty, and that for the Japanese was six. Eventually, the Japanese withdrew after being paid a massive indemnity by the Qing. This incident caused the Qing to re-think the importance of Taiwan in their maritime defense strategy and greater importance was placed on gaining control over the wilderness regions. On the eve of the First Sino-Japanese War, about 45 percent of the island was administered under direct Qing administration while the remaining was lightly populated by Aborigines.[52] ... It was not until the defeat of the Chinese navy during the First Sino-Japanese War in 1894–95 that Japan was finally able to gain possession of Taiwan, and with it saw the shifting of Asian dominance from China to Japan. The Treaty of Shimonoseki was signed on April 17, 1895, ceding Taiwan and the Penghu Islands to Japan, which would rule the island for 50 years until its defeat in World War II. ----- On the eve of the First Sino-Japanese War, the Qing administration controls 45 percent of Taiwan.
    2
  3662. 2
  3663. 2
  3664. 2
  3665. 2
  3666. 2
  3667. 2
  3668. 2
  3669. 2
  3670. 2
  3671. 2
  3672. 2
  3673. 2
  3674. 2
  3675. 2
  3676. 2
  3677. 2
  3678. 2
  3679. 2
  3680. 2
  3681. 2
  3682. 2
  3683. 2
  3684. 2
  3685. 2
  3686. 2
  3687. 2
  3688. 2
  3689. 2
  3690. 2
  3691. 2
  3692. 2
  3693. 2
  3694. 2
  3695. 2
  3696. 2
  3697. 2
  3698. 2
  3699. 2
  3700. 2
  3701. 2
  3702. 2
  3703.  @stephenhoward358  China Negative List 2020 a.k.a. anti-foreigner protectionist list Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    2
  3704. 2
  3705. 2
  3706. 2
  3707. 2
  3708. 2
  3709. 2
  3710. 2
  3711. 2
  3712. 2
  3713. 2
  3714. 2
  3715. 2
  3716. 2
  3717. 2
  3718. 2
  3719. 2
  3720. 2
  3721. 2
  3722. 2
  3723. 2
  3724. 2
  3725. 2
  3726. 2
  3727. 2
  3728. 2
  3729. 2
  3730. 2
  3731. 2
  3732. 2
  3733. 2
  3734. 2
  3735. 2
  3736. 2
  3737. 2
  3738. 2
  3739. 2
  3740. 2
  3741. 2
  3742. 2
  3743. 2
  3744. 2
  3745. 2
  3746. 2
  3747. 2
  3748. 2
  3749. 2
  3750. 2
  3751. 2
  3752. 2
  3753. 2
  3754. 2
  3755. 2
  3756.  @Lancor84  For post-WW2 Japan, MacArthur also executed land reform by shifting significant wealthy landlord's lands to the workers with private land title transfers. MacArthur = land reform transfers that included private land title transfers to the workers. From http://www.crosscurrents.hawaii.edu/content.aspx?lang=eng&site=japan&theme=work&subtheme=AGRIC&unit=JWORK098# Land Reform in Postwar Japan As part of the democratization of Japan after World War II, Japanese leaders and Occupation authorities worked together to carry out land reform. It is regarded as one of the most successful of the Occupation-era reforms, and has become the model for land reform in other countries. The purpose of land reform was to reduce the wide gap between absentee landlords who owned agricultural land but did not farm it themselves, and tenant farmers who rented the land in exchange for giving the landlord a high proportion of the crop. The land reform laws were intended to limit the amount of farm land one household could own to about the amount of land that one family could farm themselves, without outside labor. The government forced absentee landlords to sell all their land to the government. Farmers were allowed to own a small amount of farm land that they could rent out to others ( 2.5 acres or one hectare in most parts of Japan, and 10 acres or 4 hectares in Hokkaido), and had to sell any excess to the government. The government then sold this land, usually to the tenant who had been farming it. The result greatly improved the living conditions of farmers. Idealogical basis: A family's land ownership. The West has its own idealogy on land reform with family unit and private ownership as its core idealogy. VS Marxist Communism = land reform transfer to the state, no private land title transfer to the workers. The state has the power instead of individual family units.
    2
  3757. 2
  3758. 2
  3759. 2
  3760. 2
  3761. 2
  3762. 2
  3763. 2
  3764. 2
  3765. 2
  3766. 2
  3767. 2
  3768. 2
  3769. 2
  3770. 2
  3771. 2
  3772. 2
  3773. 2
  3774. 2
  3775. 2
  3776. 2
  3777. 2
  3778. 2
  3779. 2
  3780. 2
  3781. 2
  3782. 2
  3783. 2
  3784. 2
  3785. 2
  3786. 2
  3787. 2
  3788. 2
  3789. 2
  3790. 2
  3791. 2
  3792. 2
  3793. 2
  3794. 2
  3795. 2
  3796. 2
  3797. 2
  3798. 2
  3799. 2
  3800. 2
  3801. 2
  3802. 2
  3803. 2
  3804. 2
  3805. 2
  3806. 2
  3807. 2
  3808. 2
  3809. 2
  3810. 2
  3811. 2
  3812. 2
  3813. 2
  3814. 2
  3815. 2
  3816. 2
  3817. 2
  3818. 2
  3819. 2
  3820. 2
  3821. 2
  3822. 2
  3823. 2
  3824. 2
  3825. 2
  3826.  @legend9805  2011 military intervention in Libya, Timeline 21 February 2011: Libyan deputy Permanent Representative to the UN Ibrahim Dabbashi called "on the UN to impose a no-fly zone on all of Tripoli to cut off all supplies of arms and mercenaries to the regime." 23 February 2011: French President Nicolas Sarkozy pushed for the European Union (EU) to pass sanctions against Gaddafi (freezing Gaddafi family funds abroad) and demand he stop attacks against civilians. 25 February 2011: Sarkozy said Gaddafi "must go." 26 February 2011: United Nations Security Council Resolution 1970 was passed unanimously, referring the Libyan government to the International Criminal Court for gross human rights violations. It imposed an arms embargo on the country and a travel ban and assets freeze on the family of Muammar Al-Gaddafi and certain Government officials. 28 February 2011: British Prime Minister David Cameron proposed the idea of a no-fly zone to prevent Gaddafi from "airlifting mercenaries" and "using his military aeroplanes and armoured helicopters against civilians." 1 March 2011: The US Senate unanimously passed non-binding Senate resolution S.RES.85 urging the United Nations Security Council to impose a Libyan no-fly zone and encouraging Gaddafi to step down. The US had naval forces positioned off the coast of Libya, as well as forces already in the region, including the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise. 2 March 2011: The Governor General of Canada-in-Council authorised, on the advice of Prime Minister of Canada Stephen Harper, the deployment of the Royal Canadian Navy frigate HMCS Charlottetown to the Mediterranean, off the coast of Libya.[58] Canadian National Defence Minister Peter MacKay stated that "[w]e are there for all inevitabilities. And NATO is looking at this as well ... This is taken as a precautionary and staged measure."[57] 7 March 2011: US Ambassador to NATO Ivo Daalder announced that NATO decided to step up surveillance missions of E-3 AWACS aircraft to twenty-four hours a day. On the same day, it was reported that an anonymous UN diplomat confirmed to Agence France Presse that France and Britain were drawing up a resolution on the no-fly zone that would be considered by the UN Security Council during the same week.[44] The Gulf Cooperation Council also on that day called upon the UN Security Council to "take all necessary measures to protect civilians, including enforcing a no-fly zone over Libya." 9 March 2011: The head of the Libyan National Transitional Council, Mustafa Abdul Jalil, "pleaded for the international community to move quickly to impose a no-fly zone over Libya, declaring that any delay would result in more casualties."[41] Three days later, he stated that if pro-Gaddafi forces reached Benghazi, then they would kill "half a million" people. He stated, "If there is no no-fly zone imposed on Gaddafi's regime, and his ships are not checked, we will have a catastrophe in Libya."[42] 10 March 2011: France recognized the Libyan NTC as the legitimate government of Libya soon after Sarkozy met with them in Paris. This meeting was arranged by Bernard-Henri Lévy.[59] 12 March 2011: The Arab League "called on the United Nations Security Council to impose a no-fly zone over Libya in a bid to protect civilians from air attack."[49][50][51][60] The Arab League's request was announced by Omani Foreign Minister Yusuf bin Alawi bin Abdullah, who stated that all member states present at the meeting agreed with the proposal.[49] On 12 March, thousands of Libyan women marched in the streets of the rebel-held town of Benghazi, calling for the imposition of a no-fly zone over Libya.[43] 14 March 2011: In Paris at the Élysée Palace, before the summit with the G8 Minister for Foreign Affairs, Sarkozy, who is also the president of the G8, along with French Foreign Minister Alain Juppé met with US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and pressed her to push for intervention in Libya.[61] File:US Supports No-Fly Zone Against Libya.ogv VOA News report on the United States joining Lebanon, France and United Kingdom to support the no-fly zone. 15 March 2011: A resolution for a no-fly zone was proposed by Nawaf Salam, Lebanon's Ambassador to the UN. The resolution was immediately backed by France and the United Kingdom. 17 March 2011: The UN Security Council, acting under the authority of Chapter VII of the UN Charter, approved a no-fly zone by a vote of ten in favour, zero against, and five abstentions, via United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973. The five abstentions were: Brazil, Russia, India, China, and Germany. Less than twenty-four hours later, Libya announced that it would halt all military operations in response to the UN Security Council resolution. Libyan anti-government rebels, 1 March 2011 18 March 2011: The Libyan foreign minister, Moussa Koussa, said that he had declared a ceasefire, attributing the UN resolution.[67] However, artillery shelling on Misrata and Ajdabiya continued, and government soldiers continued approaching Benghazi.[19][68] Government troops and tanks entered the city on 19 March.[69] Artillery and mortars were also fired into the city. 19 March 2011: French[73] forces began the military intervention in Libya, later joined by coalition forces with strikes against armoured units south of Benghazi and attacks on Libyan air-defense systems, as UN Security Council Resolution 1973 called for using "all necessary means" to protect civilians and civilian-populated areas from attack, imposed a no-fly zone, and called for an immediate and with-standing cease-fire, while also strengthening travel bans on members of the regime, arms embargoes, and asset freezes. 21 March 2011: Obama sent a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate claiming the actions were justified under the War Powers Resolution. 24 March 2011: In telephone negotiations, French foreign minister Alain Juppé agreed to let NATO take overall military operations on 29 March at the latest, allowing Turkey to veto strikes on Gaddafi ground forces from that point forward. Later reports stated that NATO would take over enforcement of the no-fly zone and the arms embargo, but discussions were still underway about whether NATO would take over the protection of civilians mission. Turkey reportedly wanted the power to veto airstrikes, while France wanted to prevent Turkey from having such a veto. 25 March 2011: NATO Allied Joint Force Command in Naples took command of the no-fly zone over Libya and combined it with the ongoing arms embargo operation under the name Operation Unified Protector. ------ NATO command has gimped by Turkey that was later resolved, but that slowdown didn't stop France from leading the military intervention in Libya.
    2
  3827. 2
  3828. 2
  3829. 2
  3830. 2
  3831. 2
  3832. 2
  3833. 2
  3834. 2
  3835. 2
  3836. 2
  3837. 2
  3838. 2
  3839. 2
  3840. 2
  3841. 2
  3842. 2
  3843.  @fungi8419  From theage.com.au/national/former-trade-minister-s-wellness-business-owes-1-million-to-underworld-figure-20200605-p5500a.html Andrew Robb retired from politics in 2016 to become a business and political consultant, most recently advising the Victorian government on its decision to join China’s controversial Belt and Road Initiative. --- The Morrison federal government crushed Andrew Robb's advice and the Andrews Victorian state government's CCP Belt and Road Initiative. ----------------------- From skynews.com.au/details/_6159623173001 The Chinese-Australia influencer whose company helped the Victorian government sign up to the Belt and Road Initiative was hired "without any tender process" and without any public disclosure according to the Australian's Rachel Baxendale. Jean Dong, who has lived in Australia for close to 15 years, is the director of 'Australia China Belt and Road Initiative' a company paid more than $35,000 to consult the Victorian government on its deal with China. Ms Dong has hired key former politicians including former trade minister Andrew Robb, and former finance minister Lindsay Tanner, but without any financial compensation according to Ms Baxendale. "Are Lindsay Tanner and Andrew Robb doing this out of the goodness of their hearts," she said. Ms Baxendale told Sky News host Andrew Bolt, Jean Dong clearly has "very strong connections to powerful people within the Chinese Communist Party". ----------------------- Lindsay Tanner, Australian Labor Party MP. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lindsay_Tanner
    2
  3844. 2
  3845. 2
  3846. 2
  3847. 2
  3848. 2
  3849. 2
  3850.  @alballesteros6421  Linguistic influence left lasting marks on every Philippine language. Below are some borrowed terms, which were often Buddhist and Hindu concepts, with the original Sanskrit; some of the words in many Philippine languages are loaned from Sanskrit and Tamil. The conservative nature of these loanwords and shared correspondence with Malay suggest that many of these loanwords were borrowed from an earlier form of Classical Malay that preserved the distinction between several Sanskrit phonemes. Tagalog Statue depicting Shiva as Nataraja. budhî "conscience" from the Sanskrit bodhi Bathalà "bhattara – Hindu God Shiva" from the Sanskrit Bhattara dalità "one who suffers" from the Sanskrit dharita dukhâ "poverty" from the Sanskrit dukkha guró "teacher" from the Sanskrit guru sampalatayà "faith" from the Sanskrit sampratyaya mukhâ "face" from the Sanskrit mukha lahò "eclipse", "disappear" from the Sanskrit rahu maharlika "noble" from Sanskrit mahardikka saranggola "kite" from Sanskrit layang gula (via Malay) bagay "thing" from Tamil "vagai" talà "star" from Sanskrit tara puto, a traditional rice pastry, from Tamil puttu (via Malay) malunggay "moringa" from Tamil "murungai" saksí "witness" from Sanskrit saksi Kapampangan kalma "fate" from the Sanskrit karma damla "divine law" from the Sanskrit dharma mantala -"magic formulas" from the Sanskrit mantra upaya "power" from the Sanskrit upaya lupa "face" from the Sanskrit rupa sabla "every" from the Sanskrit sarva lawu "eclipse" from the Sanskrit rahu Galura "giant eagle (a surname)" from the Sanskrit garuda Laksina "south" (a surname) from the Sanskrit dakshin Laksamana/Lacsamana/Laxamana "admiral" (a surname) from the Sanskrit lakshmana Cebuano asuwang "demon" from Sanskrit asura balita "news" from Sanskrit varta bahandi "wealth" from Sanskrit bhandi baya "warning to someone in danger" from Sanskrit bhaya budaya "culture" from Sanskrit; combination of boddhi, "virtue" and dhaya, "power" diwata "goddess" from Sanskrit devata gadya "elephant" from Sanskrit gajha puasa "fasting" from Sanskrit upavasa saksí "witness" from Sanskrit saksi CCP's Imperial China's monopoly maritime trade arguments are nonsense.
    2
  3851. 2
  3852. 2
  3853. 2
  3854. 2
  3855. 2
  3856. 2
  3857. 2
  3858. 2
  3859. 2
  3860. 2
  3861. 2
  3862. 2
  3863. 2
  3864. 2
  3865. 2
  3866. 2
  3867. 2
  3868. 2
  3869. 2
  3870. 2
  3871. 2
  3872. 2
  3873. From March 2017, China has higher trade tariffs on US built cars before Trump's response. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/20/business/economy/china-us-trade-tariffs.html For example, an American car going to China pays 25% import duty, but a Chinese car coming to the US only pays 2.5%, a tenfold difference — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 8, 2018 From Musk's March 8th, 2018, China already has 25 percent import duty on US made cars before Trump's response. ---------- https://theconversation.com/why-china-could-never-sign-on-to-the-trans-pacific-partnership-56361 State-owned enterprises (SOEs) The TPP requires that no subsidies should be provided to an SOE for its international business expansion. The goal: to ensure competition between an SOE and a private enterprise takes place on a level playing field inside the host country. But China’s 150,000 SOEs form the bedrock of the Chinese economy and therefore have certain privileges. About a thousand SOEs are listed in the Shanghai or Shenzhen Stock Exchanges, indicating they are commercial in nature. More than 150 of these are managed by the central SASAC, and the list includes some of the largest companies in the world. The Chinese government assists these SOEs in various ways, including preferential interest rates. Although there have been exceptions under the TPP (for example New Zealand was able to get exemptions for its powerful cooperative Fonterra), it would have been an uphill battle for China to negotiate exemptions for so many of its SOEs engaged in various international operations within TPP member countries. --- CPTPP was designed to be anti-China SOE.
    2
  3874. 2
  3875. 2
  3876. 2
  3877. 2
  3878. 2
  3879. 2
  3880. 2
  3881. 2
  3882. 2
  3883. 2
  3884. 2
  3885. 2
  3886. 2
  3887. 2
  3888. 2
  3889. 2
  3890. 2
  3891. 2
  3892. 2
  3893. 2
  3894. 2
  3895. 2
  3896. 2
  3897. 2
  3898. 2
  3899. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    2
  3900. 2
  3901. 2
  3902. 2
  3903. 2
  3904. 2
  3905. 2
  3906. 2
  3907. 2
  3908. 2
  3909. 2
  3910. 2
  3911. 2
  3912. 2
  3913. 2
  3914. 2
  3915. 2
  3916. 2
  3917. 2
  3918. 2
  3919. 2
  3920. 2
  3921. 2
  3922. 2
  3923. 2
  3924. 2
  3925. 2
  3926. 2
  3927. 2
  3928. 2
  3929. 2
  3930. 2
  3931. 2
  3932. 2
  3933. 2
  3934. 2
  3935. 2
  3936. 2
  3937. 2
  3938. 2
  3939. 2
  3940. 2
  3941. 2
  3942. 2
  3943. 2
  3944. 2
  3945. 2
  3946. 2
  3947. 2
  3948. 2
  3949. 2
  3950. 2
  3951. 2
  3952. 2
  3953. 2
  3954. 2
  3955. 2
  3956. 2
  3957. 2
  3958. 2
  3959. 2
  3960.  @yogiahmad328  Indonesia wasn't part of the British Empire and the Commonwealth of Nations. Dutch controlled Java, Sumatra, and most of the Indonesian archipelago. When Napoleon fell from power and the French left Holland, the Dutch and the British signed The Treaty of London in London 1824. This treaty stated that all colonies that belonged to the Dutch from 1801 be returned to the Dutch Administrators. In 1801 the British took control of Minahasa, which is a region located on the northern tip of the Indonesian island of Sulawesi. In 1814, during Napoleonic rule when the French were occupying Holland, the British arrived on the island of Sumatra in Indonesia. The British established Fort York as headquarters, which was later renamed Fort Marlborough. Due to the power shift to the British the leader of the Java people became Lieutenant Governor Sir Thomas Stanford Raffles. Governor Raffles proposed to the Indonesians a partial self- government and the land-tenure system. The land-tenure system threw out the much-hated agricultural system that had been put in place by the Dutch. The land-tenure system was a system where crops were grown and were given freely to the government. This is different from the system in place under the Dutch, which was that the crops were grown by the citizens and the government took them without paying for them. Governor Raffles also ended slave trade, restored the native temples in Indonesia, and allowed research to be conducted on many topics. When Napoleon fell from power and the French left Holland, the Dutch and the British signed The Treaty of London in London 1824. This treaty stated that all colonies that belonged to the Dutch from 1801 be returned to the Dutch Administrators.
    2
  3961. 2
  3962. 2
  3963. 2
  3964. 2
  3965. 2
  3966. 2
  3967. 2
  3968. 2
  3969. 2
  3970. 2
  3971. 2
  3972. 2
  3973. 2
  3974. 2
  3975. 2
  3976. 2
  3977. 2
  3978. 2
  3979. 2
  3980. 2
  3981. 2
  3982. 2
  3983. 2
  3984. 2
  3985. 2
  3986. 2
  3987. 2
  3988. 2
  3989. 2
  3990. 2
  3991. 2
  3992. 2
  3993. 2
  3994. 2
  3995. 2
  3996. 2
  3997. 2
  3998. 2
  3999. Before Euromaidan, Russia started a trade war against Ukraine, forcing Yanukovych to sign a base rental extension agreement that breached Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 disallows foreign military bases after 2017. Read the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 which disallows foreign military bases after 2017. CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on 28 June 1996 Article 17 The location of foreign military bases shall not be permitted on the territory of Ukraine. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17. After 2017, Ukraine's constitution is incompatible with foreign military bases hosting either NATO or CSTO. If Yanukovych didn't sign the military base rental extension, Russia would be kicked out of Crimea. Putin's narrative is FALSE. Putin's pressure caused Yanukovych to make a mistake. --- Every country has the right to operate a biolab and Ukraine did NOT invade another country. Basic pathology blood test requires a bio lab. Saddam's Iraq invaded two other countries i.e. Kuwait and Iran. Remember, Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum exchanged Ukraine's nuclear WMD for security assurances from US, UK, and Russia. France and China signed a watered-down Budapest Memorandum. Budapest Memorandum requires Ukraine to join Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty as part of Ukraine's nuclear WMD disarmament. Tucker is ignorant of Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum. Did you know Australia has similar security assurances like Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum and Australia does NOT have a NATO Article V level guarantee with the US? From 1950 to the 1960s, Australia detonated nuclear bombs as a joint partner with the UK. Australia has many Biolabs for agriculture, animal health, human health and 'etc'.
    2
  4000. 2
  4001. 2
  4002. 2
  4003. 2
  4004. @Oblivion >My problem with this whole "Stealth doesn't need dogfighting ability, it eliminates everything from a distance" thing False narrative. F-35A Block 3F still has 9G dogfighting capability. From Out Of The Shadows: RNLAF experiences with the F-35A - Combat Aircraft Magazine May 2018 1. Lightest empty weight F-16A MLU air-superiority model needs to be clean (no weapons, no external tanks) to make visual range dogfight interesting against combat loaded F-35A Block 3F. 2. Dutch has acknowledged early F-35 Block builds being beaten by F-16s with external fuel tanks which are NOT applicable for F-35A Block 3F build. Don't use Block 2A/2B/3i numbers! Quoting Out Of The Shadows: RNLAF experiences with the F-35A - Combat Aircraft Magazine May 2018 specifically against David Axe's report Knight divulged a little more information about flying basic fighter manoeuvres (BFM) in an F-35. 'When our envelope was cleared to practise BFM we got the opportunity to fight some fourth-generation fighters. Remember, back the rumors were that the F-35 was a pig. The first time the opponents showed up [in the training area] they had wing tanks along with a bunch of missiles. I guess they figured that being in a dirty configuration wouldn't really matter and that they would still easily outmanoeuvre us. By the end of the week, though, they had dropped their wing tanks, transitioned to a single centerline fuel tank and were still doing everything they could not to get gunned by us. A week later they stripped the jets clean of all external stores, which made the BFM fights interesting, to say the least.
    2
  4005. 2
  4006. 2
  4007. 2
  4008. 2
  4009. 2
  4010. 2
  4011. 2
  4012. 2
  4013. 2
  4014. 2
  4015. 2
  4016. 2
  4017. 2
  4018. 2
  4019. 2
  4020. 2
  4021. 2
  4022. 2
  4023. 2
  4024. 2
  4025. 2
  4026. 2
  4027. 2
  4028. 2
  4029. 2
  4030. 2
  4031. 2
  4032.  @alcapone7867  That's a false equivalence. Unlike Russia, the US did NOT assimilate Iraq into the US federal structure. >Yugoslavia 9 February 1994: At UN request, NATO agreed to authorise air strikes, declared 20 km total exclusion zone around Sarajevo and required Bosnian Serbs to withdraw heavy weapons from zone or place them under UN control within 10 days; also called on Bosnian Government to place heavy weapons in Sarajevo under UN control. Agreement between 'RS' and Bosnian Government to a ceasefire in Sarajevo, negotiated by Lieutenant-General Sir Michael Rose, then Commander of UN forces in Bosnia. >Afghanistan Osama Bin Laden's group in Afghanistan has executed strikes inside the US. >Libya NATO STOPPED the bloody civil war in Libya. Putin STARTED the bloody war in Ukraine. On 16 August 2003, Libya formally admitted responsibility for Pan Am Flight 103 (Lockabie bombing) in a letter presented to the president of the United Nations Security Council. "On 10 March 2011, France was the first country in the world to recognise the National Transitional Council as the legitimate government of Libya". United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 was adopted by the United Nations Security Council on 17 March 2011 in response to the First Libyan Civil War. The Security Council resolution was proposed by France, Lebanon, and the United Kingdom. Muammar Gaddafi played stupid games and win stupid prizes. If, however, you are referring to the NATO intervention in Libya, that was NATO agreeing to enforce a United Nations Security Council Resolution. It was never intended as a permanent expansion of the Alliance to embrace Libya nor to establish a NATO base in the country. >Iraq Iraq invaded Kuwait. Iraq STARTED the bloody war in Kuwait. Iraq's top oil exports countries from Jan to Jun 2020 1st, China! 29 million tonnes <---- LOL 2nd, India, 23 million tonnes 3rd, EU, 8 million tonnes 4th, South Korea, 6 million tonnes 5th, Turkey, 4 million tonnes with an upwards trend 5th, USA, 4 million tonnes with a downwards trend Report: Saudi Arabia Presses U.S. on Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Date: January 19, 1992 <----- note the 1992 year From AP NEWS NEW YORK (AP) _ Saudi Arabia is pressuring the Bush administration to secretly arm and give intelligence to Iraqi opposition forces so they can work to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a newspaper reported Sunday. The Saudis want the United States to give arms and intelligence to Kurdish rebels in north Iraq, Shiite Muslim fighters in the south and Sunni Muslim opposition forces in central Iraq, the Times said, quoting U.S. and allied officials it didn’t name.
    2
  4033. 2
  4034. 2
  4035. 2
  4036. 2
  4037. 2
  4038. 1
  4039. 1
  4040. 1
  4041. 1
  4042. 1
  4043. 1
  4044. 1
  4045. 1
  4046. 1
  4047. 1
  4048. 1
  4049. 1
  4050. 1
  4051. 1
  4052. 1
  4053. 1
  4054. 1
  4055. 1
  4056. 1
  4057. 1
  4058. 1
  4059. 1
  4060. 1
  4061. 1
  4062. 1
  4063. 1
  4064. 1
  4065. 1
  4066. 1
  4067. 1
  4068. 1
  4069. 1
  4070. 1
  4071. 1
  4072. 1
  4073. 1
  4074. 1
  4075. 1
  4076. 1
  4077. 1
  4078. 1
  4079. 1
  4080. 1
  4081. Matthew Ray Titanium is stronger than aluminium and my point was the 3 services are not flying F-35B but 3 separate F-35 fighters. From http://breakingdefense.com/2014/06/gen-mike-hostage-on-the-f-35-no-growlers-needed-when-war-starts/3/ General Mike Hostage On The F-35 vs F-16 The F-35, he says, has “at least” the maneuverability and thrust and weight of the F-16. The F-35 is to the F-22 as the F-16 is to the F-15. This is USAF's expectation when F-35A reaches Block 3F. Articles like http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/pentagon-lowers-f-35-performance-bar-381031/   uses DOT&E 2012 report refers to Block 2A. From http://www.defensenews.com/article/20130531/DEFREG02/305310021/Pentagon-First-F-35s-Operational-2015 Pentagon: First F-35s Operational in 2015 These are F-35A and F-35B Block 2B. The DOT&E report is a snapshot in time, not an immutable definition of the capabilities of the system. View http://s619.photobucket.com/user/SpudmanWP/media/F-3520Master20Plan.jpg.html The so-call reduction performance in 2012 is line with the above "Block Plan: Capabilities / Transition Plan" table. At Block 2A, the G numbers are 5.5 / 4.5 /4.5. <------ Year 2012 At Block 2B / 3I, G numbers are 7 / 5.5 / 7.5.  <------ Year 2015 At Block 3C(3F) stage, G numbers are 9 / 7 /7.5. Like the F-16, F-35A obtains it's 9G rating at Block 3C(3F) stage which is superior to any F-18 variants. References for F35's engine improvements during and after year 2013. (Note Ref 1) From Feb 2013, read http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/pratt-amp-whitney-to-test-upgraded-f135-this-year-382781/ The option to add 5 percent of thrust on top of 43,000 lbf i.e. 45150 lbf. This improvement also has 5 percent fuel efficiency increase from USN's Fuel Burn Reduction (FBR) programme. This engine improvement was tested late year 2013. (Note Ref 2) From Sep 2013, read http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/pratt-amp-whitney-and-afrl-start-testing-on-adaptive-fan-test-390994/ Pratt has another engine update for F-35 i.e. another 10% increase in thrust and 25 percent fuel efficiency increase. This is adaptive engine upgrade. (Note Ref 2) From http://www.pw.utc.com/Press/Story/20130619-0600/2013/All%20Categories Year 2016 for adaptive engine test with higher 10% increase in thrust power AND  25 percent increase in fuel efficiency. From Norwegians' F-35 briefings http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/FD/Temadokumenter/JSF_RBI-svar.pdf F-35 Block 6 has + Range improvements + Propulsion Improvements. View http://i619.photobucket.com/albums/tt271/SpudmanWP/F-35BlockUpgrades.jpg Again, there's an engine upgrade at Block 6. It's a no brainier that F-35A would have acceleration/speed issues if the year 2013's engine upgrades are missing-in-action during the year 2012. The Block Plan: Capabilities / Transition Plan road map has indicated this. Australia based their plans on the above time table i.e. around year 2019 to 2023. The risk is not reaching USAF's expectation for F-16 like performance at Block 3F.
    1
  4082. Matthew Ray Range F-15E Combat radius: 790 mi (1,150 mi (max)) Ferry range: 2,400 mi (2,100 nmi, 3,900 km) with conformal fuel tank and three external fuel tanks. Ferry range has no weapons. Rafale Combat radius: 1,852+ km (1,000+ nmi) on penetration mission. Range: 3,700+ km (2,000+ nmi)  with 3 drop tanks. F-35A's range with 2500 lb tactical load out is 3000km with just internal fuel tank. Adaptive engine increase the range to around 3900 Km Israel is working on conformal fuel tank solution for F-35 for greater range e.g. >3000 km or adaptive engine >3900 km. F-35A Maximum speed: Mach 1.6+ (1,200 mph, 1,930 km/h) (tested to Mach 1.61) Very little difference between internal weapons loaded or clean. Dassault_Rafale Maximum speed(clean):  Mach 1.8 (1,912 km/h, 1,032 knots) Note the MPH or km/h numbers. F-35's Mach number is being down played, while MPH or  km/h are  similar to F-18E/F and Rafale. Speed of sound is not a constant Altitude vs speed of sound sea level = 761 MPH 10000 feet = 734 MPH 20000 feet = 701 MPH 30000 feet = 678 MPH 40000 feet = 660 MPH 50000 feet = 660 MPH With internal weapons bay, F-35A would be faster than Rafale and F-18E/F. F-35's stealth is just an extra layer in addition to it's counter-measures i.e. "break the kill chain" which makes it harder to get a missile lock. There's a difference between missile lock and detection. F-35A is not another B2 or F-117 i.e. F-35A's main goal is F-16 like fighter with stealth and longer transits range. USAF's F-35 has better stealth than F-22. Year 2012 Block 2A is long past and it's nearly year 2015 Block 2B. Australia has delayed their main F-35 purchases to around 2019 to 2023. "Lockheed Martin's development roadmap extends until 2021, including a Block 6 engine improvement in 2019" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_F-35_Lightning_II#Engines The latest  F-35s orders are without engines. LOL.. talk about Osborne effect... Block 3F, Block 4, Block 5 and Block 6 upgrades are running in parallel.   The JSF partners will reject F-35, if it repeats F-16/79.
    1
  4083. 1
  4084. 1
  4085. 1
  4086. 1
  4087. 1
  4088. 1
  4089. 1
  4090. 1
  4091. 1
  4092. 1
  4093. 1
  4094. 1
  4095. 1
  4096. 1
  4097. 1
  4098. 1
  4099. 1
  4100. 1
  4101. 1
  4102. 1
  4103. 1
  4104. 1
  4105. 1
  4106. macfly72 , On the ATLC Air Forces Monthly had an article, "The Big Fight", about the Advanced Tactical Leadership Course (ATLC) in its April 2010 issue. The successive article (same issue), "Justifiably Proud!", was an interview with Lt. Col. Fabrice Grandclaudon, Commander of EC 1/7. "AFM: You apparently said 'the Rafale rubbed F-22 - the most modern fighter of the USAF. During six encounters the F-22 hit its goal only once'. The 27th FS doesn't remember the engagements that way and say the F-22 scored several victories against Rafale. Did you offer DACT to the Raptors and did they decline? I did not say we 'rubbed them', I said that there was only one shot claimed (ie a simulated kill) for the six that were set-up. I read in a recent issue of Air et Cosmos that it was two. As far as I am concerned, one or two shots of six Basic Fighter Manoeuvres (BFM) encounters is a victory for the F-22 but not an overwhelming one. Not like the one we claimed against the Typhoons after combat in Solenzara, Corsica during September (9 set-up: 8 to 1 for the Rafale*). The other set-ups versus F-22s were terminated for combat deck, an un-decisive situation or lack of fuel. We never shot them down, but we hope to do so soon since we are quite good opposition for them, and it is in the pilot's spirit not to give up! Like almost every nation, we offered Beyond Visual Range DACT, of course, but the F-22 was only authorized to do BFM 1v1 Within Visual Range (WVR) versus foreign countries (except the UK, with whom they did not fight even in the BFMs). I wish we could have done so, but we didn't - which bring me back to Air et Cosmos, where its information about BVR engagement with AMRAAM in stealth mode is wrong: besides the fact that we did not even fly BVR vs F-22s! F-22 was fitted with some specific device to increase their radar signature. It enabled us to have contact with them during work ups for example. But that's not the point here." ------------- 1. "one or two shots of six Basic Fighter Manoeuvres (BFM) encounters is a victory for the F-22" . 2. "We never shot them down" on another setup. Note that F-22s has to increase it's RCS for the training. In a real combat, F-22A's specific device to increase their radar signature would be turned off and Rafale's pilots would have comparably inferior situation awareness than F-22's pilots since Rafale's pilots wouldn't be aware of F-22A's specific location i.e. it's another F-22's mass (simulated) killing of F-15s type scenario. Without F-22A's RCS booster, Rafale's pilots wouldn't be able to locate the F-22s for training.
    1
  4107. 1
  4108. 1
  4109. 1
  4110. 1
  4111. 1
  4112. 1
  4113. 1
  4114. From http://www.airforce.gov.au/Technology/Future-Acquisitions/F-35A-Lightning-II/?RAAF-ZRnYQhJUh1u0e44uR32olOT1rt+Ym4K3 "The first F-35 aircraft will arrive in Australia in 2018 and the first squadron, Number 3 Squadron, will be operational in 2021.  All 72 aircraft are expected to be fully operational by 2023" "The total capital cost of $12.4 billion for this acquisition includes the cost of associated facilities, weapons and training." "Around $1.6 billion in new facilities and infrastructure will be constructed, including at RAAF Base Williamtown in New South Wales and RAAF Base Tindal in the Northern Territory." ---- Australia is upgrading it's air bases together with F-35s. Some JSF countries wouldn't be bothered with airbase upgrades. Minus the airbase upgrades, its $150 million AUD for each F-35A which includes the cost of weapons and training. Australian Dollar is slightly weaker than US Dollar i.e. that's about 131 million dollar per F-35A unit that includes new weapons. Fighters without weapons are useless. Rafale's program cost to date is around €45.9 billion (Y2013) with 130 units (June 2014). That's about 61.27 billion USD. F-35's program cost to date is around $50 billion USD (Y2013) with 100 units. Euro currency is higher than USD. The reason for near $400 billion USD is due to United States' 2,443 aircraft purchase which is magnitude larger than France's Rafale fleet.. ----------- Reference for F-35 program cost. On 21 August 2013 C-Span reported that Congressional Quarterly and the Government Accountability Office were indicating the "total estimated program cost now is $400b—nearly twice the initial cost". The current investment was documented as approximately $50 billion. The projected $316 billion cost in development and procurement spending was estimated through 2037 at an average of $12.6 billion per year. F-35's critics doesn't apply the same max fuel loads to Russian Flankers i.e. being double standards. From  http://www.f-16.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=23442&sid=bbbc450dad2955377ec5ed7615c49fcc&start=15 Flankers can do quite limited maneuvering capability (max being about 4.5 G's IIRC) with maximum internal fuel load and to do 9 G's they need to be at about 50-60% of maximum internal fuel load. Sukhoi describes the normal takeoff weight as being with only 5270 kg of internal fuel, which is awfully little for a such powerful jet. Su-27/30/33/35 can't have both full maneuverability AND full internal fuel load simultaneously. IIRC this is because the full fuel load adversely affects the center of gravity of the plane, making it nose-heavy. I don't think there is any similar restrictions with F-35. The Vanila Su-27SK had limitation with its internal wing fuel tanks. It had a low wing loading, so if there was fuel in the wing tanks, it was limited to 6G load, until it reached 5600kg of fuel(empty wing tanks). I have not heard of any limitation about it being unballanced(COG) the way you discribe here. ----------- Flankers has it's own G loading issues i.e. effective A2A config for Flankers is around 12700 pound fuel. F-15E can have 14076 lbs of fuel + two CFT (4785 lbs) without significantly changing it's G force performance e.g. 8.0 G.
    1
  4115. 1
  4116. 1
  4117. 1
  4118. 1
  4119. ***** For A2A, do not load F-16s with drop tanks i.e. it should drop them for A2A. F-16C Block 52 Wing area: 300 ft² Empty weight: 18,900 lb Fuel:  3800 lbs (50 percent)** Weapons: 2000 lb six AIM-120 type A2A missiles Combat Weight: 24,700 lbs Thrust: 28,600 lbf Power-to-weight: 1.158 : 1 .<------- Wing loading: 82.33 lbs/ sq feet.<------- Notice the small fuel load with F-16. F-16C Block 52 also uses F100-PW-229 engine. From http://www.f-16.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=11567 F-15E's F100-PW-229 (MIL) 17,800lbs @ 0.726 lb/Hr/lb st (MAX) 29,100lbs @ 2.060 lb/Hr/lb st At max, duel engine would result in 4.12 lb/Hr/lb st At max engine power, F-16C Block 52's fuel consumption rate is half of F-15E. F-35A will attempt to fix F-16's small internal fuel tank issue. Weapons: 2000 lb six AIM-120 type A2A missiles F-35A Wing area: 460 ft² Empty weight: 29,030 lb (Year 2013 build) Fuel:  7038 lbs ** Combat Weight: 38,068 lbs Wing loading: 82.7 lbs/ sq feet. <----- Thrust: 40,000 lbf Power-To-Weight:  1.05  : 1 <---- old. Thrust: 43,000 lbf Power-To-Weight:  1.129 : 1 <---- current, before year 2013 upgrades. Thrust: 45,150 lbf** (Feb 2013 info update, 5 percent higher thrust). Power-To-Weight:  1.186  : 1 <---- Hot core improvements. Thrust: 47300 lbf** (just Sep 2013's 10 percent increase against 43000 lbf). Power-To-Weight:  1.24 : 1 <---- Estimate for adaptive engine. Thrust: 49,665 lbf** (Feb 2013's 5 percent increase + Sep 2013's 10 percent increase) Power-To-Weight:  1.30 : 1 <---- Estimate for adaptive engine with hot core improvements. F-35A has F-16C like wing loading with larger fuel tank. From http://www.f-16.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=11567 F135-PW-100 (MIL) 28,000lbs @ 0.886 lb/HR/lb st (According to J@ne'$, but seems too high? 0.700 is more likely) (MAX) 43,000lbs @ (~1.950?) lb/HR/lb st At max power, F-35A consumes about half the fuel rate of F-15E, hence I loaded F-35A with half of F-15's fuel load i.e. apples to apple comparison. F-35C (recent 240-4 build) Wing area: 668 ft² Empty weight: 32,072 lbs Fuel:  7038 lbs ** Wepaons: 2000 lbs (six AIM-120 types) Combat Load: 41,110 lbs Static Wing Loading: 61.54 lbs/ sq feet Thrust: 43,000 lbf Power-Weight: 1.05 : 1  (more with year 2016 adaptive engine) F-35C has a lower wing loading than F-16A and SU-30MKI. References F35's year 2013 engine improvements.* From Feb 2013, read http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/pratt-amp-whitney-to-test-upgraded-f135-this-year-382781/ The option to add 5 percent of thrust on top of 43,000 lbf i.e. 45150 lbf. This improvement also has 5 percent fuel efficiency increase from USN's Fuel Burn Reduction (FBR) programme. From Sep 2013, read http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/pratt-amp-whitney-and-afrl-start-testing-on-adaptive-fan-test-390994/ Pratt has another engine update for F35 i.e. another 10% increase in thrust and 25 percent fuel efficiency increase. This is adaptive engine upgrade. http://www.pw.utc.com/Press/Story/20130619-0600/2013/All%20Categories Year 2016 for adaptive engine test with higher 10% increase in thrust power AND  25 percent increase in fuel efficiency. From Norwegians' F-35 briefings http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/FD/Temadokumenter/JSF_RBI-svar.pdf Notional Block 6 has + Range improvements + Propulsion Improvements. From http://breakingdefense.com/2014/06/gen-mike-hostage-on-the-f-35-no-growlers-needed-when-war-starts/3/ General Mike Hostage On The F-35 vs F-16 The F-35, he says, has “at least” the maneuverability and thrust and weight of the F-16. The F-35 is to the F-22 as the F-16 is to the F-15. General Mike Hostage supports my F-35 wing loading and power-to-weight calculations.
    1
  4120. 1
  4121. 1
  4122. 1
  4123. 1
  4124. 1
  4125. 1
  4126. 1
  4127. 1
  4128. 1
  4129. 1
  4130. 1
  4131. 1
  4132. 1
  4133. 1
  4134. 1
  4135. 1
  4136. 1
  4137. 1
  4138. 1
  4139. 1
  4140. 1
  4141. 1
  4142. 1
  4143. 1
  4144. 1
  4145. 1
  4146. 1
  4147. 1
  4148. 1
  4149. 1
  4150. 1
  4151. ***** Any modern fighter CAN carry most missile types, but who is paying for the integration? That's an extra cost for the export customer. Furthermore, Rafale is limited to single data link to it's data linked enabled missiles. Then there's restricted information access for the French side with certain non-French weapons systems e.g. a problem with French DCNS with U.S. combat systems for Australia's new submarine plans. Other solution such as EF, Gripen and F35 are out-of-the-box supports US and EU (minus French missiles e.g. MICA) sourced missiles. Your statement for Russian missile support for Rafale is a red herring for Canada. Another problem for Rafale is the industrial offsets i.e. F-16 has beaten the competition with industrial offsets. Industrial offsets are scaled to it's largest customer. The recent F-16V build already has a new customer i.e. Taiwan. For cheap 4.5 gen solution is to upgrade F-16C/D Block 25 to Block 52+ then F-16V configuration. France can't beat U.S. market dumping/flooding F-16C/D Block 25s. http://breakingdefense.com/documents/services-set-ioc-dates-for-f-35s-confidence-is-the-watchword/   The Air Force F-35A will reach the IOC milestone by December 2016. Note that these current fighter solutions are will be rendered obsolete with USAF's 6th gen laser optimised fighter aircraft i.e. aircraft designed around a gun i.e. laser. I repeat, F-35 was designed to replace F-16 NOT F-15.  http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/air-space/2016/01/11/lockheed-begins-assembly-first-israeli-f-35/78636818/ Israel's F-35I  is being assembled as of Q1 2016. http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/air-space/2016/03/01/norwegian-f-35-pilot-counters-controversial-dogfighting-report/81170580/    Norwegian F-35 Pilot Counters Controversial ‘Dogfighting’ Report (David Axe's Q1 2015 report). The air-break(e.g. cobra maneuver type)+superior nose pointing+missile launch tactics mirrors Russian Flanker or USN Super Hornet's dogfight tactics. Norwegian F-35 pilot doesn't fly with USAF's F-35A AF-02 (year 2008) build aircraft i.e. hint: 3rd Gen helmet is a dead give away.
    1
  4152. 1
  4153. 1
  4154. 1
  4155. 1
  4156. 1
  4157. 1
  4158. 1
  4159. 1
  4160. 1
  4161. 1
  4162. 1
  4163. 1
  4164. 1
  4165. Actually, Xbox 360 has more advanced unified shader GPU over PS3. PS3's CELL SPE was busy patching the  aging NVIDIA RSX GPU. From forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=57736&page=5 I could go on for pages listing the types of things the spu's are used for to make up for the machines aging gpu, which may be 7 series NVidia but that's basically a tweaked 6 series NVidia for the most part. But I'll just type a few off the top of my head: 1) Two ppu/vmx units There are three ppu/vmx units on the 360, and just one on the PS3. So any load on the 360's remaining two ppu/vmx units must be moved to spu. 2) Vertex culling You can look back a few years at my first post talking about this, but it's common knowledge now that you need to move as much vertex load as possible to spu otherwise it won't keep pace with the 360. 3) Vertex texture sampling You can texture sample in vertex shaders on 360 just fine, but it's unusably slow on PS3. Most multi platform games simply won't use this feature on 360 to make keeping parity easier, but if a dev does make use of it then you will have no choice but to move all such functionality to spu. 4) Shader patching Changing variables in shader programs is cake on the 360. Not so on the PS3 because they are embedded into the shader programs. So you have to use spu's to patch your shader programs. 5) Branching You never want a lot of branching in general, but when you do really need it the 360 handles it fine, PS3 does not. If you are stuck needing branching in shaders then you will want to move all such functionality to spu. 6) Shader inputs You can pass plenty of inputs to shaders on 360, but do it on PS3 and your game will grind to a halt. You will want to move all such functionality to spu to minimize the amount of inputs needed on the shader programs. 7) MSAA alternatives Msaa runs full speed on 360 gpu needing just cpu tiling calculations. Msaa on PS3 gpu is very slow. You will want to move msaa to spu as soon as you can. 8)Post processing 360 is unified architecture meaning post process steps can often be slotted into gpu idle time. This is not as easily doable on PS3, so you will want to move as much post process to spu as possible. 9) Load balancing 360 gpu load balances itself just fine since it's unified. If the load on a given frame shifts to heavy vertex or heavy pixel load then you don't care. Not so on PS3 where such load shifts will cause frame drops. You will want to shift as much load as possible to spu to minimize your peak load on the gpu. *10) Half floats You can use full floats just fine on the 360 gpu. On the PS3 gpu they cause performance slowdowns. If you really need/have to use shaders with many full floats then you will want to move such functionality over to the spu's.* 11) Shader array indexing You can index into arrays in shaders on the 360 gpu no problem. You can't do that on PS3. If you absolutely need this functionality then you will have to either rework your shaders or move it all to spu.Etc, etc, etc...
    1
  4166. 1
  4167. 1
  4168. 1
  4169. 1
  4170. 1
  4171. 1
  4172. 1
  4173. 1
  4174. 1
  4175. 1
  4176. 1
  4177. 1
  4178. 1
  4179. 1
  4180. 1
  4181. 1
  4182. 1
  4183. 1
  4184. 1
  4185. 1
  4186. 1
  4187. 1
  4188. 1
  4189. 1
  4190. 1
  4191. 1
  4192. 1
  4193. 1
  4194. 1
  4195. 1
  4196. 1
  4197. 1
  4198. 1
  4199. 1
  4200. 1
  4201. 1
  4202. 1
  4203. 1
  4204. 1
  4205. Xpenguin17revived YOU are WRONG you stupid clown.  The Korean peninsula had been occupied by Japan from 1910. On August 9, 1945, in the closing days of World War Two, the Soviet Union declared war on Japan and advanced into Korea. Though the Soviet declaration of war had been agreed by the Allies at the Yalta Conference, the US government became concerned at the prospect of all of Korea falling under Soviet control. The US government therefore requested Soviet forces halt their advance at the 38th parallel north, leaving the south of the peninsula, including the capital, Seoul, to be occupied by the US. This was incorporated into General Order No. 1 to Japanese forces after the Surrender of Japan on August 15. On August 24, the Red Army entered Pyongyang and established a military government over Korea north of the parallel. American forces landed in the south on September 8 and established the United States Army Military Government in Korea. The divided Korea mirrored the divided Germany between USSR and West (France/UK/US). They split between the sphere of influence of USSR and USA. China, Korea and Japan issues are old conflicts. In AD 663 the Battle of Baekgang took place, the first China-Japanese conflict in recorded history. The battle was part of the ancient relationships between the Korean Three Kingdoms (Samguk or Samhan), the Japanese Yamato, and Chinese dynasties. The battle itself came near the conclusion of this period with the fall of Baekje, one of the Samguk or three Korean kingdoms, coming on the heels of this battle. Btw. I'm not from England. Your assumptions amounts to fiction. PRC also has capitalist system with "Chinese characteristics". Try again. Go back to school.
    1
  4206. 1
  4207. 1
  4208. 1
  4209. 1
  4210. 1
  4211. 1
  4212. 1
  4213. 1
  4214. 1
  4215. 1
  4216. 1
  4217. 1
  4218. 1
  4219. 1
  4220. 1
  4221. 1
  4222. 1
  4223. 1
  4224. 1
  4225. 1
  4226. 1
  4227. 1
  4228. Matthew Ray From http://breakingdefense.com/2014/06/gen-mike-hostage-on-the-f-35-no-growlers-needed-when-war-starts/3/ General Mike Hostage On The F-35 vs F-16 The F-35, he says, has “at least” the maneuverability and thrust and weight of the F-16. The F-35 is to the F-22 as the F-16 is to the F-15. This is USAF's expectation for F-35A Block 3F, but it's not F-22A. Blame USAF for spec'ing F-35A as current service F-16C. USN is looking at LM's F-35C-Plus proposal for F/A-XX i.e. it should be a double engine F-35C that goes beyond F-35C Block 6 (which includes engine upgrade).  LM has offered both a clean sheet design or upgraded F-35C-Plus variant for F/A-XX. There's very little point building the 4th F-35 variant if  F-35C Block 6 covers USN's F/A-XX requirement.   View http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/images/f-22_yf-22_comp.jpg Notice the wing shape difference between YF-22 vs F-22A   F-35A's top view plan. http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/planes/f35/f16-f35-f22.jpg F-35C's top view plan. http://internetlooks.com/f35ccf01100c.jpg Notice F-35's wing shape almost recycles YF-22's wing shape. A double engine F-35C-Plus is more or less YF-22 for USN. F-22's massive >70000 lbf engines pushes the fighter to mach 2.2+. F-35's aero shaping is similar to YF-22 but with a weaker engine solution i.e. missing an engine. Australia has announced they will be replacing Super Hornets after 72 F-35A units with future F-35 units. We don't know if Australia's purchasing plans follows USN's F/A-XX program.    Buying YF-22 class fighter via F-35C-Plus variant back door would be nicer for Australia. US already has  F-35 based RAM coating with mach 2.2 considerations from F-22 Lot 9. Empty weight wing loading F-35C (240-4 build) Wing area: 668 ft² Empty weight: 32,072 lbs Additional F-135 engine: 3800 lbs New empty weight: 35872 lbs Wing Loading: 53.7 lbs/ sq feet F-22A (USAF) Wing area: 840 ft² Empty weight: 43340 lb Wing loading: 51.59 lbs/ sq feet. <--- Notice how close is the double engine F-35C to F-22A. F-35C-Plus with two 43000 lbf engines would be T/W monster. They may need to expand the wing area for the additional 3800 lb weight engine. Might as well build updated F-22A and rename it as F-35D or F-35E. If Super Hornet gets dumped during 2025 to 2030 time period, F-35C-Plus would be quickest solution for completion. Obama will be out of office sometime in 2016.
    1
  4229. 1
  4230. 1
  4231. 1
  4232. Sean Dutton stop being stupid. Wing loadings via empty weight. F-35A Empty weight: 29,030 lb (Year 2013 build). Wing area: 460 ft² Wing loading: 63.11 lbs/ sq feet. F-16C Block 52 Wing area: 300 ft² Empty weight: 18,900 lb Wing loading: 63 lbs/ sq feet. F-35A's empty weight is 1.54X scaled from F-16C. F-35A's wing area is 1.53X scaled from F-16C. F-35A's 43000 lbf thrust is 1.50X scaled from F-16C's 28600 lbf. There's a near straight scaling between F16C to F-35A. From http://breakingdefense.com/2014/06/gen-mike-hostage-on-the-f-35-no-growlers-needed-when-war-starts/3/ General Mike Hostage On The F-35 vs F-16 The F-35, he says, has “at least” the maneuverability and thrust and weight of the F-16. The F-35 is to the F-22 as the F-16 is to the F-15. F-35A's main target goal is to replace current service F-16C. F-35A Empty weight: 29,030 lb (Year 2013 build). Wing Area: 460 ft² Weapons: 2000 lb Fuel: 7070 lb  Combat load: 38100 lb Wing loading 82.83 lbs/ sq feet. Thrust: 43000 lbf Power-to-Weight: 1.13 : 1   F-16C Block 52 Empty weight: 18900 lb Wing Area: 300 ft² Weapons: 2000 lb Fuel: 3950 lb at 56% internal fuel tank Wing loading: 82.83 lbs/ sq feet. Combat Load: 24850 lb Thrust: 28600 lbf Power-to-Weight: 1.15 : 1 References for F35's engine improvements during and after year 2013. (Note Ref 1) From Feb 2013, read http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/pratt-amp-whitney-to-test-upgraded-f135-this-year-382781/ The option to add 5 percent of thrust on top of 43,000 lbf i.e. 45150 lbf. This improvement also has 5 percent fuel efficiency increase from USN's Fuel Burn Reduction (FBR) programme. This engine improvement was tested late year 2013. (Note Ref 2) From Sep 2013, read http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/pratt-amp-whitney-and-afrl-start-testing-on-adaptive-fan-test-390994/ Pratt has another engine update for F-35 i.e. another 10% increase in thrust and 25 percent fuel efficiency increase. This is adaptive engine upgrade. (Note Ref 2) From http://www.pw.utc.com/Press/Story/20130619-0600/2013/All%20Categories Year 2016 for adaptive engine test with higher 10% increase in thrust power AND  25 percent increase in fuel efficiency. From Norwegians' F-35 briefings http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/FD/Temadokumenter/JSF_RBI-svar.pdf F-35 Block 6 has + Range improvements + Propulsion Improvements. Going beyond F-16C F-35A Empty weight: 29,030 lb (Year 2013 build). Wing Area: 460 ft² Weapons: 2000 lb Fuel: 7070 lb  Combat load: 38100 lb Wing loading 82.83 lbs/ sq feet. Thrust: 47300 lbf  (just the adaptive engine upgrade with 25 percent increase in fuel efficiency) Power-to-Weight: 1.24 : 1 *Thrust: 45150 lbf  (just the hot-core upgrade for power, neutral fuel consumption increase) Power-to-Weight: 1.185 : 1 Why continue posting these nonsense, even other aircraft producer (Saab) has agreed that F-35A is not too bad? http://i328.photobucket.com/albums/l327/encia/F35/F-35AfromSaab_zps6b92ab35.jpg
    1
  4233. 1
  4234. 1
  4235. 1
  4236. 1
  4237. 1
  4238. ***** Please post the link that shows  your Chris Bogdan's statement. http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;db=COMMITTEES;id=committees%2Fcommjnt%2F0b6ee58c-c085-45b2-b846-270356b353dc%2F0004;query=Id%3A%22committees%2Fcommjnt%2F0b6ee58c-c085-45b2-b846-270356b353dc%2F0000%22 CHAIR: If you can condense it to the maximum extent possible, that would be great. Air Marshal Browne : He said:[General Michael Hostage]: ""I believe that the comments I made in the interview with the Air Force Times on 2 February and my comments that [if] I do not keep the F22 viable and the F35 frankly will be irrelevant have been taken out of context by folks in Australia [and the internet]. The overall context was an acquisition focus about building the United States military force capable of independently engaging a near-peer competitor on their own turf with the densest and most dangerous integrated air defence system. I was asked why I needed to upgrade the F22 if I had the F35. I said in that context a reduced USAA F fleet of 763 F35s — we had just finished a conversation on how I needed 1 , 763 F35s and not a single aircraft less — would not provide the air combat capability necessary without the additional 180-plus F22 s. The question I answered was about the F22, not the F35. Of note, I used the reference to the F35 to emphasise the importance of the F22, not to denigrate the F35. It was in that context of an independent US major combat operations with a near- peer competitor. "" From http://breakingdefense.com/2014/06/gen-mike-hostage-on-the-f-35-no-growlers-needed-when-war-starts/3/ General Mike Hostage On The F-35 vs F-16 The F-35, he says, has “at least” the maneuverability and thrust and weight of the F-16. The F-35 is to the F-22 as the F-16 is to the F-15. Wing loadings via empty weight. F-35A Empty weight: 29,030 lb (Year 2013 build). Wing area: 460 ft² Wing loading: 63.11 lbs/ sq feet. F-16C Block 52 Wing area: 300 ft² Empty weight: 18,900 lb Wing loading: 63 lbs/ sq feet. F-35A's empty weight is 1.54X scaled from F-16C. F-35A's wing area is 1.53X scaled from F-16C. F-35A's 43,000 lbf thrust is 1.50X scaled from F-16C's 28600 lbf. There's a near straight scaling between F16C to F-35A. The wing loading on F-35A is higher than F-22A. Only F-35C's wing loading can rival F-22A's wing loading. USAF spec'ed F-35A as F-16 like fighter with F-18's high AoA, hence the blame falls down to USAF. F-35C (recent 240-4 build) Wing area: 668 ft² (larger than F-15C) Empty weight: 32,072 lbs (similar to F-15E) For F-35C, it needs an engine higher F-15C's  47,540 lbf of thrust. Atm, F-35C has 43,000 lbf engine i.e. refer to adaptive engine upgrade with 10 percent higher thrust e.g. 47300 lbf. http://www.airforce-magazine.com/MagazineArchive/Pages/2012/November%202012/1112fighter.aspx The F-35, while not technically a "supercruising" aircraft, can maintain Mach 1.2 for a dash of 150 miles without using fuel-gulping afterburners.  "Mach 1.2 is a good speed for you, according to the pilots," O’Bryan said. F-22A's super cruise is around mach 1.7. F-35's mach 1.2 super cruise is with current F135 engine. Adaptive engine upgrade may change this level. View http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/images/f-22_yf-22_comp.jpg Notice the wing shape difference between YF-22 vs F-22A   F-35A's top view plan. http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/planes/f35/f16-f35-f22.jpg F-35C's top view plan. http://internetlooks.com/f35ccf01100c.jpg Notice F-35's wing shape almost recycles YF-22's wing shape. It would easy for LM to reboot YF-22 as F-35D with two engines I.e. similar to  Classic Hornet to Super Hornet revision.  The problem is USAF's F16 with F-18's high AoA specs. Each F135 engine weighs around  3,750 pounds. View http://img463.imageshack.us/img463/992/f35f22shockum9.jpg If F-35A has similar nose and wing Mach speed angles as F-22A.  F-35A has  66 percent of F-22A's empty weight, hence it would need similar F-22A level power to weight ratios. F-22A's two 37000 (using the info F-16.net web site) engines pushes the aircraft to around Mach 2.184 to 2.25, so 66 percent empty weight would equate to 48840 lbf class engine (using 2.184 number). Both F-22A and F-35 has similar frontal section.
    1
  4239. 1
  4240. 1
  4241. +murni rohayu They were living in Turkey (the 1st safe country) for number years with rent being paid by the Father's sister. What is a refugee The 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (the 1951 Refugee Convention) is the key international legal document defining who is a refugee, their rights and the legal obligations of countries that are signatories to the 1951 Refugee Convention.[1] Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Refugee Convention defines a ‘refugee’ as: a person who is outside his country of nationality or habitual residence has a well-founded fear of persecution because of his race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinion, and is unable or unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country, or to return there, for fear of persecution.[2] A Convention ‘refugee’ is different from an ‘asylum seeker’ because the former has had their asylum claims assessed and been found to satisfy the above definition. This assessment can be done by a country that has acceded to the 1951 Refugee Convention or by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). There is no such thing as a ‘genuine refugee’. A refugee by technical definition is simply someone who has been recognised as satisfying the above Convention definition. Further, a person is a refugee within the meaning of the 1951 Convention as soon as they satisfy the above definition. This might actually occur before their refugee status is formally determined by a country or the UNHCR. Refugee status is therefore declaratory in nature—in that a refugee does not become a refugee because they have been recognised to be one but rather, they are recognised because they are a refugee.[3] 1951 Refugee Convention refers to person's safety not picking 2nd or 3rd country with perceive better economic conditions than the first safe country, hence "economic queue jumpers" for those who didn't stay in the first safe country. 1951 Refugee Convention has morphed into something else that caused open border/uncontrolled border policy which effectively overridden the nation's sovereignty.
    1
  4242. 1
  4243. 1
  4244. 1
  4245. 1
  4246. 1
  4247. 1
  4248. 1
  4249. 1
  4250. 1
  4251. 1
  4252. 1
  4253. 1
  4254. 1
  4255. edubogota1 From http://breakingdefense.com/2014/06/gen-mike-hostage-on-the-f-35-no-growlers-needed-when-war-starts/3/ General Mike Hostage On The F-35 vs F-16 The F-35, he says, has “at least” the maneuverability and thrust and weight of the F-16. The F-35 is to the F-22 as the F-16 is to the F-15.  From http://www.airforcemag.com/DRArchive/Pages/2014/June%202014/June%2011%202014/No-Growling-Needed.aspx The F-35 is beating the stealthiness expected of it “at maturity,” said Lorraine Martin, Lockheed Martin’s F-35 program manager. Officials must still verify this claim “with more data,” she told reporters on June 9 during a company-sponsored media day in Arlington, Va. She noted that Air Combat Command chief Gen. Mike Hostage recently told Breaking Defense that the F-35 needs no jamming support from other aircraft, such as Boeing’s EF-18G Growler, in a heavily defended battlespace to “go where it needs to go.” Hostage said the F-35 actually has better stealth than the F-22. “I can’t say some of those things” due to classification, commented Martin, but she said Hostage accurately represented the F-35’s capabilities. The Growler and similar platforms are going to be “helpful” if there are “fourth generation aircraft … and they need some protection,” but the F-35 has “all the stealth we said it would have,” and can “get in and get out safely with the electronic warfare it has on it,” she asserted. The F-35’s stealth is checked as it exits production and again just before government acceptance. “And, after we fly it a few months, we put it back through the [stealth test] range and verify the stealth is still there,” said Martin. ------------------- Apples to apple comparison WITH engine fuel consumption rates. F-15E Wing area: 608 ft² Empty weight: 31,700 lb Fuel:  14076 lb ** Weapons: 2000 lb six AIM-120 type A2A missiles Max take-off weight: 81,000 lb Combat Weight: 47776 lbs Estimated on the available lift force: 33224 lbs (max takeoff weight - combat weight) Thrust: 58000 lbf Power-to-weight: 1.21 : 1 Wing loading: 78.89 ft lbs/ sq feet. From http://www.f-16.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=11567 F-15E's F100-PW-229 (MIL) 17,800lbs @ 0.726 lb/Hr/lb st (MAX) 29,100lbs @ 2.060 lb/Hr/lb st At max, duel engine would result in 4.12 lb/Hr/lb st ----------------------- F-16C Block 52 Wing area: 300 ft² Empty weight: 18,900 lb Fuel:  3800 lbs (50 percent)** Weapons: 2000 lb six AIM-120 type A2A missiles Combat Weight: 24700 lbs Thrust: 28,600 lbf Power-to-weight: 1.158 : 1 Wing loading: 82.33 ft lbs/ sq feet.<------- F-16C Block 52 also uses F100-PW-229 engine. F-35A Wing area: 460 ft² Empty weight: 29,036 lb (240-4 build) Fuel:  7038 lbs ** Weapons: 2000 lb six AIM-120 type A2A missiles Max take-off weight; 70,000 lb Combat Weight: 38074 lbs Wing loading: 82.7 ft lbs/ sq feet. Thrust: 40,000 lbf Power-To-Weight:  1.05  : 1 <---- old. Thrust: 43,000 lbf Power-To-Weight:  1.129 : 1 <---- current, before year 2013 upgrades. Thrust: 45,150 lbf** (Feb 2013 info update, 5 percent higher thrust) Power-To-Weight:  1.186  : 1 <---- Thrust: 47300 lbf** (just Sep 2013's 10 percent increase against 43000 lbf). Power-To-Weight:  1.24 : 1 <---- Thrust: 49,665 lbf** (Feb 2013's 5 percent increase + Sep 2013's 10 percent increase) Power-To-Weight:  1.30 : 1 <---- From http://www.f-16.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=11567 F135-PW-100 (MIL) 28,000lbs @ 0.886 lb/HR/lb st (According to J@ne'$, but seems too high? 0.700 is more likely) (MAX) 43,000lbs @ (~1.950?) lb/HR/lb st USAF's expectation for F-35A is F-16 with stealth and advance electronic warfare. At max power/max fuel consumption, F-35A consumes about half the fuel rate of F-15E, hence I loaded F-35A with half of F-15's fuel load i.e. apples to apple comparison. References F35's year 2013 engine improvements.* From Feb 2013, read http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/pratt-amp-whitney-to-test-upgraded-f135-this-year-382781/ Adds 5 percent on top of 43000 lbf i.e. 45150 lbf. This improvement has 5 percent fuel efficiency increase from USN's Fuel Burn Reduction (FBR) programme. From Sep 2013, read http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/pratt-amp-whitney-and-afrl-start-testing-on-adaptive-fan-test-390994/ Pratt has another engine update for F35 i.e. another 10% increase in thrust and 25 percent fuel efficiency increase. This is adaptive engine upgrade. http://www.pw.utc.com/Press/Story/20130619-0600/2013/All%20Categories Year 2016 for adaptive engine test with higher 10% increase in thrust power AND  25 percent increase in fuel efficiency. From Norwegians' F-35 briefings http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/FD/Temadokumenter/JSF_RBI-svar.pdf Notional Block 6 has + Range improvements + Propulsion Improvements. ----------- General Mike Hostage's statement supports my F-35 wing loading and power-to-weight calculations.
    1
  4256. 1
  4257. 1
  4258. 1
  4259. 1
  4260. 1
  4261. 1
  4262. 1
  4263. 1
  4264. 1
  4265. 1
  4266. 1
  4267. 1
  4268. 1
  4269. 1
  4270. 1
  4271. 1
  4272. 1
  4273. 1
  4274. 1
  4275. 1
  4276. 1
  4277. 1
  4278. 1
  4279. 1
  4280. 1
  4281. 1
  4282. 1
  4283. 1
  4284. 1
  4285. 1
  4286. 1
  4287. 1
  4288. 1
  4289. 1
  4290. 1
  4291. 1
  4292. 1
  4293. 1
  4294. 1
  4295. 1
  4296. 1
  4297. 1
  4298. 1
  4299. 1
  4300. 1
  4301. 1
  4302. 1
  4303. 1
  4304. 1
  4305. 1
  4306. 1
  4307.  @sebe2255  When Budapest Memorandum completely fails, it has a negative outcome on any US allies outside of NATO's Article V. This is why countries like South Korea and Japan are requesting the same AUKUS deal. Australia's ANZUS treaty doesn't have a NATO Article V quality. Japan can enrich fissile material into weapons-grade and the US ordered that the Japanese highly enrich fissile materials be stored in the US. The US told Taiwan and South Korea to halt the nuclear weapons program in exchange for US security assurances. If the US can't fulfill its security assurance promise, then the NPT rules-based order is dead. A significant number of GOP voters want the US to exit from defense treaties. A significant number of politicians want the US to block the AUKUS agreement. A significant number of GOP voters and politicians want the US to block an Australian company that enriches US nuclear fuels. Democrats and mainstream GOP politicians already warned GOP isolationists that Australia and UK are prepared to unilaterally proceed with the AUKUS agreement. Are you aware the leftist Canadian government has recently switched to supporting the CANZUK initiative? There is doubt about US's long-term security assurance commitment even from Five Eyes. Budapest Memorandum wasn't the 1st treaty with the US offering security assurances for another country's halting the nuclear weapons program. The EU should prepare for its own defense when GOP isolationists gain power in the US and executes unilateral defense treaty exits.
    1
  4308. 1
  4309. 1
  4310. 1
  4311.  @sebe2255  Security assurances such as those in the Budapest memorandum do not carry as much weight as NATO security guarantees. Still, security assurances have played a role in the effort to freeze and end North Korea’s nuclear program. These kinds of assurances may not by themselves offer major leverage. However, when looking for ways to prevent nuclear proliferation, Washington and its partners should marshal every possible tool. The problem is that Russia’s actions against Ukraine have discredited security assurances. If a North Korean diplomat were to ask his or her Ukrainian counterpart how the Budapest memorandum worked out, the response would not be a happy one. At a September conference in Kyiv, former President Leonid Kuchma, who signed the Budapest memorandum for Ukraine, said that Ukraine had been “cheated.” Prime Minister Arseniy Yatseniuk referred to the “notorious” Budapest memorandum. Such comments do not make good advertisements for future security assurances. Washington cannot undo Russia’s violations. It can and should, however, do more to fulfill its obligations under the Budapest memorandum by doing more to bolster Ukraine and penalize Russia until Moscow alters its policy. Such U.S. action could also change the Ukrainian narrative in the hypothetical conversation with a North Korean diplomat to “the Russians violated the memorandum, but the Americans backed us to the fullest and made Moscow pay.” That would help restore credibility to security assurances as an element in the toolkit of America’s non-proliferation diplomacy.
    1
  4312. 1
  4313. 1
  4314. 1
  4315. 1
  4316. 1
  4317. 1
  4318. 1
  4319. 1
  4320. 1
  4321. 1
  4322. 1
  4323. 1
  4324. 1
  4325.  @sebe2255  For funding context. From GPAS__2021 pdf Pension (mandated nanny state saving funds) vs GDP ratio for 2021 Five Eyes/Five Passport Group, Australia, $2,333 billion, 174.8% (CPTPP member, Nordic model), Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (USMCA, CPTPP member, Nordic model) United Kingdom, $3,564 billion, 135.1% (CPTPP member in July 2023, Nordic model) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (USMCA member) (I don't have data for NZ) Notice the Five Eyes group has similar pension assets to GDP ratio results Large-scale mandated savings funds enable the government to issue government bonds and large-scale bond buyer markets! The Western allies learn from the WW2 war bonds experience and went big. EU Finland, $279 billion, 104.3% (Nordic model) France, $166 billion, 6.5% Germany, $548 billion, 14.5% (Don't blame international banks for Germany's subpar pension saving rate) Italy, $231 billion, 12.5% (PIIGS) Netherlands, $1,900 billion, 214.4%, (Nordic model) Ireland, $197 billion, 49.4% (PIIGS) Spain, $44 billion, 3.6% (PIIGS) The EU lacks strategic savings coordination. Non-EU, Europe Switzerland, $1,163 billion, 164.3% (Nordic model) North America Mexico, $259 billion, 24.9% (USMCA, CPTPP member) Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (USMCA, CPTPP member, Nordic model) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (USMCA member) South America Brazil, $195 billion,14.3% Chile, $243 billion, 99.2% (CPTPP member) East Asia, South East Asia China, $285 billion, 1.9% Hong Kong, $199 billion, 58.3% Japan, $3,613 billion, 73.6% (CPTPP member) South Korea, $968 billion, 61.0% Malaysia, $279 billion, 83.0% (CPTPP member) South-Central Asia India, $184 billion, 7.1%
    1
  4326. 1
  4327. 1
  4328. 1
  4329. 1
  4330. 1
  4331. 1
  4332. 1
  4333.  @daniel86250  That's a false narrative. Both USA and Australia have kicked out the colonial UK government's legislative power. Your argument is racist since it supports racial segregation. The Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng) were a series of military campaigns launched by the Qing dynasty of China in the mid–late 18th century during the reign of the Qianlong Emperor (r. 1735–1796). They included three to enlarge the area of Qing control in Inner Asia: two against the Dzungars (1755–1757) and the "pacification" of Xinjiang (1758–1759). The other seven campaigns were more in the nature of police actions on frontiers already established: two wars to suppress the Gyalrong of Jinchuan, Sichuan, another to suppress the Taiwanese Aboriginals (1787–88), and four expeditions abroad against the Burmese (1765–1769), the Vietnamese (1788–1789), and the Gurkhas on the border between Tibet and Nepal (1790–1792), with the last counting as two. Faced with a powerful China in the northeast and a resurgent Siam in the southeast, Burma's King Bodawpaya and his army invaded eastern territories of India, hence bringing the rising British East India Company into the fray which defeated the Kingdom of Burma. British East India Company is allied with mostly Hindu Maratha Empire. The Maratha Empire allied with the British East India Company (based in the Bengal Presidency) against the Mysore Kingdom. Anglo-Mysore Wars started in 1767. President Xi's argument is based on historical Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng). Imperial China is an imperialist power that led to the engagement with European imperialist empires. Look in the mirror.
    1
  4334.  @toddgack2942  False. China has established foreign police stations across the world that are told to be closed down by foreign governments. China's "little green men" have inferred in medical supplies in Australia during 1st wave of COVID-19. China has engaged in territorial disputes based on Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng). The Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng) were a series of military campaigns launched by the Qing dynasty of China in the mid–late 18th century during the reign of the Qianlong Emperor (r. 1735–1796). They included three to enlarge the area of Qing control in Inner Asia: two against the Dzungars (1755–1757) and the "pacification" of Xinjiang (1758–1759). The other seven campaigns were more in the nature of police actions on frontiers already established: two wars to suppress the Gyalrong of Jinchuan, Sichuan, another to suppress the Taiwanese Aboriginals (1787–88), and four expeditions abroad against the Burmese (1765–1769), the Vietnamese (1788–1789), and the Gurkhas on the border between Tibet and Nepal (1790–1792), with the last counting as two. President Xi's argument is based on historical Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng). Xi's China has a territorial dispute with Vietnam. Xi's China has a territorial dispute with Taiwan. Xi's China has a territorial dispute with India (near Tibet and Nepal). Xi's China has a territorial dispute with the Philippines. Xi's China has a territorial dispute with Japan. This old world existed before the US became a superpower. Look in the mirror.
    1
  4335.  @toddgack2942  China has an anti-foreign "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" protectionist policy. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about other foreign countries imposing reciprocal trade policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. Note that China has a "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" which is known as CCP's protectionist list. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  4336. 1
  4337. 1
  4338. 1
  4339. 1
  4340. 1
  4341. 1
  4342. 1
  4343. 1
  4344. 1
  4345. 1
  4346. 1
  4347. 1
  4348. 1
  4349. 1
  4350. 1
  4351.  @phoebeli3742  >Unfortunately the year is 2023. Not 1976 CCP has engaged in territorial disputes based on Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng). The Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng) were a series of military campaigns launched by the Qing dynasty of China in the mid–late 18th century during the reign of the Qianlong Emperor (r. 1735–1796). They included three to enlarge the area of Qing control in Inner Asia: two against the Dzungars (1755–1757) and the "pacification" of Xinjiang (1758–1759). The other seven campaigns were more in the nature of police actions on frontiers already established: two wars to suppress the Gyalrong of Jinchuan, Sichuan, another to suppress the Taiwanese Aboriginals (1787–88), and four expeditions abroad against the Burmese (1765–1769), the Vietnamese (1788–1789), and the Gurkhas on the border between Tibet and Nepal (1790–1792), with the last counting as two. President Xi's argument is based on historical Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng). Xi's China has a territorial dispute with Vietnam. Xi's China has a territorial dispute with Taiwan. Xi's China has a territorial dispute with India (near Tibet and Nepal). Xi's China has a territorial dispute with the Philippines. Xi's China has a territorial dispute with Japan. These old-world issues existed before the US became a superpower. There's nothing new under the sun.
    1
  4352. 1
  4353. 1
  4354. 1
  4355. 1
  4356. 1
  4357. 1
  4358. 1
  4359. 1
  4360. 1
  4361. 1
  4362. 1
  4363. 1
  4364. 1
  4365. 1
  4366. 1
  4367. 1
  4368.  @gore1089  False narratives. Fraud conviction and reversal After a civil suit in 1999 that reached the Queensland Court of Appeal in 2000, involving disgruntled former One Nation member Terry Sharples and a finding of fraud when registering One Nation as a political party,[147] Hanson was facing bankruptcy. She made an appeal to supporters for donations. On 20 August 2003, a jury in the District Court of Queensland convicted Hanson and David Ettridge of electoral fraud. Both Hanson and Ettridge were sentenced to three years imprisonment for falsely claiming that 500 members of the Pauline Hanson Support Movement were members of the political organisation Pauline Hanson's One Nation to register that organisation in Queensland as a political party and apply for electoral funding. Because the registration was found to be unlawful, Hanson's receipt of electoral funding worth $498,637 resulted in two further convictions for dishonestly obtaining property, each with three-year sentences, to run concurrently with the first. The sentence was widely criticised in the media and by some politicians as being too harsh.[148] The prime minister, John Howard, said that it was "a very long, unconditional sentence" and Bronwyn Bishop said that Hanson was a political prisoner, comparing her conviction with Robert Mugabe's treatment of Zimbabwean opponents.[149] The sentence was widely criticised in the media as being too harsh.[148] On 6 November 2003, delivering judgment the day after hearing the appeal, the Queensland Court of Appeal quashed all of Hanson and Ettridge's convictions. Hanson, having spent 11 weeks in jail, was immediately released along with Ettridge.[150] The court's unanimous decision was that the evidence did not support a conclusion beyond reasonable doubt that the people on the list were not members of the Pauline Hanson's One Nation party and that Hanson and Ettridge knew this when the application to register the party was submitted. Accordingly, the convictions regarding registration were quashed. The convictions regarding funding, which depended on the same facts, were also quashed [149] This decision did not specifically follow the Sharples case, where the trial judge's finding of such fraud had not been overturned in the appeal by Hanson and Ettridge. That case was distinguished as a civil suit – in administrative law, as to the validity of the decision by Electoral Commissioner O'Shea to register the party – in which proof had been only on the balance of probabilities. Chief Justice Paul de Jersey, with whom the other two judges agreed overall, suggested that if Hanson, Ettridge and especially the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions had used better lawyers from the start, the whole matter might not have taken so long up to the appeal hearing, or might even have been avoided altogether. The Court of Appeal president, Margaret McMurdo, rebuked many politicians, including John Howard and Bronwyn Bishop MHR. Their observations, she said, demonstrated at least "a lack of understanding of the Rule of Law" and "an attempt to influence the judicial appellate process and to interfere with the independence of the judiciary for cynical political motives", although she praised other leading Coalition politicians for accepting the District Court's decision ---------------------- Margaret McMurdo was appointed by the ALP government (Peter Beattie)
    1
  4369. 1
  4370. 1
  4371. 1
  4372. 1
  4373. 1
  4374. 1
  4375. 1
  4376. 1
  4377. 1
  4378. 1
  4379. 1
  4380. 1
  4381. 1
  4382. 1
  4383. 1
  4384. 1
  4385.  @parasnaradiya2608  >45 trill pounds looted from India by brits under 200 years British Raj started from 1858 to 1947, that's 89 years. British Raj = UK government dismantled the British East India Company. In modern times, powerful foreign companies such as Facebook from the US attempted to fight the Australian federal government (center right-wing). European governments followed Australia's lead to force these powerful US social media companies to heel. Sovereign power needs to be used to smash these US companies with oversize influence. During the TTP negotiation, are you even aware our Australian federal government (central right-wing) has defended the Australian universal health care system against Obama Administration (Democrat party)'s big pharma interest? UK's Boris Johnson already stated NHS (UK's universal health care system) is not negotiable against Obama Administration's big pharma interest. CPTPP has removed US clauses for US big pharma interest. Within CPTPP, CANZUK = Four of Five Eyes/Five Passport Group with the universal health care system. CANZUK group has the Nordic model. The US is stuck in a time warp with powerful pharma companies that have oversize influence i.e. corporate colonialism. Trump kicked the US out of TPP, hence the remaining TPP members kicked out US clauses. British East India Company is an example of corporate colonialism. "The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries." I'm aware of the Biden Administration working on an alternative with their powerful pharma companies interest that undermines CPTPP. With the UK joining CPTPP, helpfully, CPTPP members can reject Democrat corporate colonialism.
    1
  4386. 1
  4387. 1
  4388. 1
  4389. 1
  4390. 1
  4391. 1
  4392. 1
  4393. 1
  4394. 1
  4395. 1
  4396. 1
  4397. 1
  4398. 1
  4399. 1
  4400. 1
  4401. shareofhonor During pre-WW2, Imperial Japan is resource poor and most of it's military material investments was geared towards the navy which is similar UK's navy bias military spending. To repeating the same mistakes, modern Japan made a deal instead with Australia and Canada. Most of Nazi Germany's military material investments was geared towards land armies. Nazi Germany's large land army is useless against UK's Royal navy! USA production is more than 4 times since US was only nation to mass produced aircraft carriers. Germany Tiger I tank's 1,347 units x 44 tons = 59,268 tons Tiger II tank has 492 units x 68 tons = 33,456 tons Panther tank has 6000 units x 44 tons = 264,000 tons Panzer IV has 8,553 unit x 25 tons = 213,825 tons Total: 570549 tons Czech's Panzer 38(t) has 1414 units x 10 tons = 14140 tons USA M26 tanks has 2,212 units x 44 tons = 97,328 tons M26 has 90 mm gun. M4 tanks has 49,234 units x 33 tons = 1,624,722, Russian T34 tanks has similar number. M10 tank destroyer has 6,406 units x 29 tons = 185,774 tons M18 tank destroyer has 2,507 units x 39 tons = 97,773 tons M36 tank destroyer has 2,324 units x 29 tons = 67,396 tons M36 has 90 mm gun. Sub-Total: 2,072,993 tons M4 Sherman Firefly (UK) has 2,200 units x 35 tons = 77,000 tons. Firefly takes on Tiger I and Panther tanks. US has both quality (M26) and numbers (M4). Significant amount of US Army's tonnage was against German army. US has the following aircraft carrier production 24 Essex-class fleet carriers with 90 to 110 aircraft each. 650,400 tons for Essex-class. 21 Commencement Bay class with 228,900 tons 50 Casablanca-class with 390,000 tons. 45 Bogue-class with 747,900 tons 3 Yorktown-class fleet carriers with 59,400 tons Sub-Total: 3,798,645 tons Modern day USN aircraft carrier tonnage is just about 1,460,000 tons. Significant amount of USN's tonnage was against Japanese navy. WW2 UK has similar aircraft carrier builds as Imperial Japan i.e. around 10 to 11 units. Not including UK, US and Canada other surface combat ships e.g. destroyers, heavy cruisers, battleships and 'etc'. Grand Total: 5,871,638 tons For US, that's already 10.3X times over Germany's iron/steel tonnage extract/production. WW2 Russian navy is small. WW2 German navy is small. Both Canada and USA has the advantage of the entire North American continent on raw metal and oil resources. European mainland is raw resource poor, hence the reason for Hitler wanting Russian lands.
    1
  4402. 1
  4403. 1
  4404. 1
  4405. 1
  4406. 1
  4407. 1
  4408. 1
  4409. 1
  4410. 1
  4411. 1
  4412. 1
  4413. 1
  4414. 1
  4415. 1
  4416. 1
  4417. @UC5nvM9W_AYHXIcOlUk-oFbw >There wasn't any civil war that America and Nato put to an end in Libya. That's a FALSE narrative. Reminders, On 16 August 2003, Libya formally admitted responsibility for Pan Am Flight 103 (Lockabie bombing) in a letter presented to the president of the United Nations Security Council. "On 10 March 2011, France was the first country in the world to recognise the National Transitional Council as the legitimate government of Libya". NATO command structure wasn't used since Turkey vetoed it until United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973! Muammar Gaddafi played stupid games and won stupid prizes. Both Libyan officials and international states and organizations called for a no-fly zone over Libya in light of allegations that Muammar Gaddafi's military had conducted airstrikes against Libyan rebels in the Libyan Civil War. Timeline 21 February 2011: Libyan deputy Permanent Representative to the UN Ibrahim Dabbashi called "on the UN to impose a no-fly zone on all of Tripoli to cut off all supplies of arms and mercenaries to the regime." *23 February 2011: French President Nicolas Sarkozy pushed for the European Union (EU) to pass sanctions against Gaddafi (freezing Gaddafi family funds abroad) and demand he stop attacks against civilians. * >>>> 25 February 2011: Sarkozy said Gaddafi "must go." <<< 26 February 2011: United Nations Security Council Resolution 1970 was passed unanimously, referring the Libyan government to the International Criminal Court for gross human rights violations. It imposed an arms embargo on the country and a travel ban and assets freeze on the family of Muammar Al-Gaddafi and certain Government officials 28 February 2011: British Prime Minister David Cameron proposed the idea of a no-fly zone to prevent Gaddafi from "airlifting mercenaries" and "using his military aeroplanes and armoured helicopters against civilians. 12 March 2011: The Arab League "called on the United Nations Security Council to impose a no-fly zone over Libya in a bid to protect civilians from air attack." The Arab League's request was announced by Omani Foreign Minister Yusuf bin Alawi bin Abdullah, who stated that all member states present at the meeting agreed with the proposal. On 12 March, thousands of Libyan women marched in the streets of the rebel-held town of Benghazi, calling for the imposition of a no-fly zone over Libya. ----- The US supported Arab League's "impose a no-fly zone over" and French President Nicolas Sarkozy's Gaddafi "must go." Your narrative is FALSE.
    1
  4418. 1
  4419. 1
  4420. 1
  4421. 1
  4422. 1
  4423. 1
  4424. 1
  4425. 1
  4426.  @MAINA_THETHERE_1704  Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq ----
    1
  4427. 1
  4428. 1
  4429. 1
  4430. 1
  4431. 1
  4432. 1
  4433. 1
  4434. 1
  4435. 1
  4436. 1
  4437. 1
  4438. 1
  4439. 1
  4440. 1
  4441. 1
  4442. 1
  4443. 1
  4444. 1
  4445. 1
  4446. 1
  4447. 1
  4448. 1
  4449. 1
  4450.  @hollysmith1347  >And the whole lie of WMD. Why isn't Bush imprisoned for war crimes and U.S sanctioned? Twenty Iraqi Kurds have taken legal action to expose French firms who supplied poison gas to Saddam Hussein in 1988. The plaintiffs were among the victims of a chemical weapon attack that killed 5,000 in the town of Halabja during the Iran-Iraq war. A Dutch businessman who sold Iraq chemicals used in the attack was ordered to pay 400,000 euros to some of the victims in April 2013. ----- Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq ----- The Iraqi WMD issue is NOT yet over when Kurdish victims are suing European companies in the EU court system who sold chemicals to Saddam. LOL
    1
  4451. 1
  4452. 1
  4453. 1
  4454. 1
  4455. 1
  4456. 1
  4457. 1
  4458. 1
  4459. 1
  4460. 1
  4461. 1
  4462. 1
  4463. 1
  4464. 1
  4465. 1
  4466. 1
  4467. 1
  4468. 1
  4469. 1
  4470. 1
  4471. 1
  4472. 1
  4473. 1
  4474. 1
  4475. 1
  4476. 1
  4477. 1
  4478. 1
  4479. 1
  4480. 1
  4481. 1
  4482. 1
  4483. 1
  4484. 1
  4485. 1
  4486. 1
  4487. 1
  4488. 1
  4489. 1
  4490. 1
  4491. 1
  4492. 1
  4493. 1
  4494. 1
  4495. 1
  4496. 1
  4497. 1
  4498. 1
  4499. 1
  4500. 1
  4501. 1
  4502. 1
  4503. 1
  4504. 1
  4505. 1
  4506. 1
  4507. 1
  4508. 1
  4509.  @ozziecoops  Scott Ritter is an incompetent investigator who chicken out on investigating western businesses that profited from Iraqi WMDs. Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq -------- Iraq's WMD issue is not yet finished when the Kurds are suing WMD profiteers in the European court system.
    1
  4510. 1
  4511. 1
  4512. 1
  4513. 1
  4514.  @ozziecoops  The Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical.
    1
  4515. 1
  4516. 1
  4517. 1
  4518. 1
  4519. 1
  4520. 1
  4521. 1
  4522. 1
  4523. 1
  4524. 1
  4525. 1
  4526. 1
  4527. 1
  4528. 1
  4529. 1
  4530. 1
  4531. 1
  4532. 1
  4533. 1
  4534. 1
  4535. 1
  4536. 1
  4537. 1
  4538. 1
  4539. @OddPotato That's a false equivalence. >Yugoslavia 9 February 1994: At UN request, NATO agreed to authorise air strikes, declared 20 km total exclusion zone around Sarajevo and required Bosnian Serbs to withdraw heavy weapons from zone or place them under UN control within 10 days; also called on Bosnian Government to place heavy weapons in Sarajevo under UN control. Agreement between 'RS' and Bosnian Government to a ceasefire in Sarajevo, negotiated by Lieutenant-General Sir Michael Rose, then Commander of UN forces in Bosnia. UN Security Council through UNSCR 836 of 4 June 1994 authorizes the use of air power to defend the safe areas created by UN Security Council resolution 824 of 6 May 1993. Paragraph 10 of UNSCR 836 stipulates: "...Member States, acting nationally or through regional organisations or arrangements, may take, under the authority of the Security Council and subject to close coordination with the Secretary-General and UNPROFOR, all necessary measures, through the use of air power, in and around the safe areas in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, to support UNPROFOR in the performance of its mandate..." >Libya NATO STOPPED the bloody civil war in Libya. Putin STARTED the bloody war in Ukraine. On 16 August 2003, Libya formally admitted responsibility for Pan Am Flight 103 (Lockabie bombing) in a letter presented to the president of the United Nations Security Council. "On 10 March 2011, France was the first country in the world to recognise the National Transitional Council as the legitimate government of Libya". United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 was adopted by the United Nations Security Council on 17 March 2011 in response to the First Libyan Civil War. The Security Council resolution was proposed by France, Lebanon, and the United Kingdom. Muammar Gaddafi played stupid games and win stupid prizes. The US supported France(EU)'s and UK(EU)'s, and Lebanon's United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973. NATO wasn't used until United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 since it was vetoed by Turkey. >Iraq Iraq invaded Kuwait. Iraq STARTED the bloody war in Kuwait. Iraq's top oil exports countries from Jan to Jun 2020 1st, China! 29 million tonnes <---- LOL 2nd, India, 23 million tonnes 3rd, EU, 8 million tonnes 4th, South Korea, 6 million tonnes 5th, Turkey, 4 million tonnes with an upwards trend 5th, USA, 4 million tonnes with a downwards trend Report: Saudi Arabia Presses U.S. on Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Date: January 19, 1992 <----- note the 1992 year From AP NEWS NEW YORK (AP) _ Saudi Arabia is pressuring the Bush administration to secretly arm and give intelligence to Iraqi opposition forces so they can work to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a newspaper reported Sunday. The Saudis want the United States to give arms and intelligence to Kurdish rebels in north Iraq, Shiite Muslim fighters in the south and Sunni Muslim opposition forces in central Iraq, the Times said, quoting U.S. and allied officials it didn’t name.
    1
  4540. 1
  4541. 1
  4542. 1
  4543. 1
  4544. 1
  4545. 1
  4546. 1
  4547. 1
  4548. 1
  4549. 1
  4550. 1
  4551. 1
  4552. 1
  4553. 1
  4554. 1
  4555. 1
  4556. 1
  4557. https://www.britannica.com/list/5-amazing-adaptations-of-pyrophytic-plants Adaptations of Pyrophytic Plants from bushfires. some species actually require fire for their seeds to sprout. Some plants, such as the lodgepole pine, Eucalyptus, and Banksia, have serotinous cones or fruits that are completely sealed with resin. ----- https://www.livescience.com/40583-australia-wildfires-eucalyptus-trees-bushfires.html Like many plants native to fire-prone regions, eucalyptus trees (aka gum trees in Australia) are adapted to survive — or even thrive — in a wildfire. Fallen eucalyptus leaves create dense carpets of flammable material, and the trees' bark peels off in long streamers that drop to the ground, providing additional fuel that draws ground fires up into the leaves, creating massive, fast-spreading "crown fires" in the upper story of eucalyptus forests. Additionally, the eucalyptus oil that gives the trees their characteristic spicy fragrance is a flammable oil: This oil, combined with leaf litter and peeling bark during periods of dry, windy weather, can turn a small ground fire into a terrifying, explosive firestorm in a matter of minutes. That's why eucalyptus trees — especially the blue gums (Eucalyptus globulus) that are common throughout New South Wales — are sometimes referred to wryly as "gasoline trees." And after a bushfire sweeps through an area, the eucalyptus trees have an advantage over other plants. Their seed capsules open up when burned, and the seedlings thrive in freshly burned, ash-rich soils. "Give a hillside a really good torching and the eucalyptus will absolutely dominate," Bowman told KQED. "They'll grow intensively in the first few years of life and outcompete everything."
    1
  4558. 1
  4559. 1
  4560. 1
  4561. 1
  4562. 1
  4563. 1
  4564. 1
  4565. 1
  4566. 1
  4567. 1
  4568. 1
  4569. 1
  4570. 1
  4571. 1
  4572. 1
  4573. 1
  4574. 1
  4575. 1
  4576. 1
  4577. 1
  4578. 1
  4579. 1
  4580. 1
  4581. 1
  4582. 1
  4583. 1
  4584. 1
  4585. 1
  4586. 1
  4587. 1
  4588. 1
  4589. 1
  4590. 1
  4591. 1
  4592. 1
  4593. 1
  4594. 1
  4595. 1
  4596. 1
  4597. 1
  4598. 1
  4599. 1
  4600. 1
  4601. 1
  4602. 1
  4603. 1
  4604. 1
  4605. 1
  4606. 1
  4607. 1
  4608. 1
  4609. 1
  4610. 1
  4611. 1
  4612. 1
  4613. 1
  4614. 1
  4615. 1
  4616. 1
  4617. 1
  4618. 1
  4619. 1
  4620. 1
  4621. 1
  4622. 1
  4623. 1
  4624. Izno Iznogoud, F-35A (year 2016 build) combat radius is 1407 Km with A2A load. http://s31.postimg.org/t6r9098gb/F_35_new_range.jpg F-35A has passive EO-DAS for missile guidance. Air Forces Monthly had an article, "The Big Fight", about the Advanced Tactical Leadership Course (ATLC) in its April 2010 issue. The successive article (same issue), "Justifiably Proud!", was an interview with Lt. Col. Fabrice Grandclaudon, Commander of EC 1/7. "AFM: You apparently said 'the Rafale rubbed F-22 - the most modern fighter of the USAF. During six encounters the F-22 hit its goal only once'. The 27th FS doesn't remember the engagements that way and say the F-22 scored several victories against Rafale. Did you offer DACT to the Raptors and did they decline? I did not say we 'rubbed them', I said that there was only one shot claimed (ie a simulated kill) for the six that were set-up. I read in a recent issue of Air et Cosmos that it was two. As far as I am concerned, one or two shots of six Basic Fighter Manoeuvres (BFM) encounters is a victory for the F-22 but not an overwhelming one. Not like the one we claimed against the Typhoons after combat in Solenzara, Corsica during September (9 set-up: 8 to 1 for the Rafale*). The other set-ups versus F-22s were terminated for combat deck, an un-decisive situation or lack of fuel. We never shot them down, but we hope to do so soon since we are quite good opposition for them, and it is in the pilot's spirit not to give up! Like almost every nation, we offered Beyond Visual Range DACT, of course, but the F-22 was only authorized to do BFM 1v1 Within Visual Range (WVR) versus foreign countries (except the UK, with whom they did not fight even in the BFMs). I wish we could have done so, but we didn't - which bring me back to Air et Cosmos, where its information about BVR engagement with AMRAAM in stealth mode is wrong: besides the fact that we did not even fly BVR vs F-22s! F-22 was fitted with some specific device to increase their radar signature. It enabled us to have contact with them during work ups for example. But that's not the point here." ------------- 1. "one or two shots of six Basic Fighter Manoeuvres (BFM) encounters is a victory for the F-22" . 2. "We never shot them down" on another setup. Note that F-22s has to increase it's RCS for the training. In a real combat, F-22A's specific device to increase their radar signature would be turned off and Rafale's pilots would have comparably inferior situation awareness than F-22's pilots since Rafale's pilots wouldn't be aware of F-22A's specific location i.e. it's another F-22's mass (simulated) killing of F-15s type scenario. Without F-22A's RCS booster, Rafale's pilots wouldn't be able to locate the F-22s for training. 3. None of the OSF pictures released by the French Ministry of Defense represented a kill.
    1
  4625. 1
  4626. 1
  4627. 1
  4628. 1
  4629. 1
  4630. 1
  4631. 1
  4632. 1
  4633. 1
  4634. 1
  4635. 1
  4636. 1
  4637. 1
  4638. 1
  4639. 1
  4640. 1
  4641. 1
  4642. 1
  4643. 1
  4644. 1
  4645. 1
  4646. 1
  4647. 1
  4648. 1
  4649. 1
  4650. 1
  4651. 1
  4652. 1
  4653. 1
  4654.  @johnbodman4504  Note that China has a "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" which is known as CCP's protectionist list. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  4655. 1
  4656. 1
  4657. 1
  4658. 1
  4659. 1
  4660. 1
  4661. 1
  4662. 1
  4663. 1
  4664. 1
  4665. 1
  4666. 1
  4667. 1
  4668. 1
  4669. 1
  4670. 1
  4671. 1
  4672. 1
  4673. 1
  4674. 1
  4675. 1
  4676. 1
  4677. 1
  4678. 1
  4679. 1
  4680. 1
  4681. 1
  4682. 1
  4683. 1
  4684. 1
  4685. 1
  4686. 1
  4687. 1
  4688. 1
  4689. 1
  4690. 1
  4691. 1
  4692. 1
  4693. 1
  4694. 1
  4695. 1
  4696. 1
  4697. 1
  4698. 1
  4699. 1
  4700. 1
  4701. 1
  4702. 1
  4703. 1
  4704. 1
  4705. 1
  4706. 1
  4707. 1
  4708. 1
  4709. 1
  4710. 1
  4711. 1
  4712. 1
  4713. 1
  4714. 1
  4715. 1
  4716. 1
  4717. 1
  4718. 1
  4719. 1
  4720. 1
  4721. 1
  4722. 1
  4723. 1
  4724. 1
  4725. 1
  4726. 1
  4727. 1
  4728. For post-WW2 Japan, MacArthur also executed land reform by shifting significant wealthy landlord's lands to the workers with private land title transfers. MacArthur = land reform transfers that included private land title transfers to the workers. Land Reform in Postwar Japan As part of the democratization of Japan after World War II, Japanese leaders and Occupation authorities worked together to carry out land reform. It is regarded as one of the most successful of the Occupation-era reforms, and has become the model for land reform in other countries. The purpose of land reform was to reduce the wide gap between absentee landlords who owned agricultural land but did not farm it themselves, and tenant farmers who rented the land in exchange for giving the landlord a high proportion of the crop. The land reform laws were intended to limit the amount of farm land one household could own to about the amount of land that one family could farm themselves, without outside labor. The government forced absentee landlords to sell all their land to the government. Farmers were allowed to own a small amount of farm land that they could rent out to others ( 2.5 acres or one hectare in most parts of Japan, and 10 acres or 4 hectares in Hokkaido), and had to sell any excess to the government. The government then sold this land, usually to the tenant who had been farming it. The result greatly improved the living conditions of farmers. MacArthur's ideological basis: A family's land ownership. The West has its own idealogy on land reform with the family unit and private land ownership as its core idealogy. VS Marxist = land reform transfer to the state, no private land title transfer to the workers. Marxist is a fake.
    1
  4729. 1
  4730. 1
  4731. 1
  4732. 1
  4733. 1
  4734. 1
  4735. 1
  4736. 1
  4737. 1
  4738. 1
  4739. 1
  4740. 1
  4741. 1
  4742. 1
  4743. 1
  4744. 1
  4745. 1
  4746. 1
  4747. It depends on which F-35 model. https://www.reddit.com/r/F35Lightning/comments/8a66ta/out_of_the_shadows_rnlaf_experiences_with_the/ Out Of The Shadows: RNLAF experiences with the F-35A - Combat Aircraft Magazine May 2018 1. Dutch F-35 Block 3F, "F-35 sits somewhere in between the F-16 and F/A-18 when it comes to within visual range manoeuvring'". 2. Lightest empty weight F-16A MLU air-superiority model needs to be clean (no weapons, no external tanks) to make visual range dogfight interesting against combat loaded F-35A Block 3F. 3. Dutch has acknowledged early F-35 Block builds being beaten by F-16s with external fuel tanks which are NOT applicable for F-35A Block 3F build. Don't use Block 2A/2B/3i numbers! http://nettsteder.regjeringen.no/kampfly/2015/11/20/a-fly-f-35-erfaringer-fra-den-forste-uka/ More F-16 vs F-35 from Norwegian pilot. I quote Overall, flying the F-35 reminds me a bit of flying the F/A-18 Hornet, but with an important difference: It has been fitted with a turbo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNXhrYNv_xM NATO Frisian Flag - mass launch and recovery of Vipers, Typhoons, Gripens & Hornets Original source (non-English) http://suomenkuvalehti.fi/jutut/kotimaa/suomella-vahvat-ilmavoimat-mutta-kuinka-kauan/ Frisian Flag 2012 exercises in Holland, Finnish F-18Cs gets 100 kills and 6 loses against Eurofighter (Germany, UK), Polish new F-16 and older F-16 planes (Norway, Belgium) and Gripen (Swedish) Finland's F-18C has 16:1 kill ratio over Germany/UK's Eurofighter, Poland's F-16C Block 52+ and Norway/Belgium's F-16A MLU and Sweden's Gripen.
    1
  4748. 1
  4749. 1
  4750. 1
  4751. 1
  4752. 1
  4753. 1
  4754. 1
  4755. 1
  4756. 1
  4757. 1
  4758. 1
  4759. 1
  4760. 1
  4761. 1
  4762. 1
  4763. 1
  4764. 1
  4765. 1
  4766. 1
  4767. 1
  4768.  @ivanbremer8662  >No plan for Australia’s energy future. Labor and Greens are against CO2-free nuclear power. >No manufacturing. Blame Democrats under the Clinton administration for allowing China into WTO (trade zone) with promise exception entry. >No COVID plan. FALSE, Dan Andrews didn't like the detention center plan. >Failed vaccination plan. NSW's vaccination rates beat Victoria. Australia's vaccination rates exceeded the US's and Israel's. > Failed quarantine plan, only saved by state governments, medical professionals, virus trackers and the Australian people. FALSE, Dan Andrews didn't like the detention center plan. Dan Andrews's hotel quarantine has failed, hence the second wave. > Failed Aussie repatriation. (With more parked aircraft and pilots than ever in history.) Fools like you caused the second wave. >Failed to build Federal, purpose built quarantine. (We have a military trained and experienced at build facility's in developing country's in a crises.) FALSE, Dan Andrews didn't like the detention center plan. Dan Andrews's hotel quarantine has failed. Daniel Andrews took the idea of state govt’s running quarantine to National Cabinet! Watch video. ------------------------- >No plan for electric car infrastructure or manufacture. Labor appointed Judge killed Toyota Australia's electric-petrol hybrid engine manufacturing. >Sports rorts, That's leftist ABC link. Bridget McKenzie: no politicisation in ‘sports rorts’ funding >Timor-Leste bugging. You're supporting countries outside of Australia. It reveals your anti-Australia position. >Water rorts 19 percent of QLD's surface water entitlements are owned by foreigners. The report released in January 2019 by the Productivity Commission that found, the Murray-Darling Basin Authority should be broken up. Whilst the MDBA is a Commonwealth Government agency, an inter-governmental Murray‑Darling Basin Ministerial Council (Ministerial Council) acts in an advisory role in preparing and implementing the Basin Plan by the MDBA. The Ministerial Council comprises the Commonwealth Minister for Agriculture and Water Resources (who also chairs the Council) and one minister from each of the Basin states (Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria, and South Australia) and the Australian Capital Territory. QLD has a Labor government! >Robo debt The Government announced in May 2020 that they would commence paying back refunds from early July 2020. As at May 2021, the vast majority of refunds had been paid. The refund will include the repayment of any money paid towards a Robodebt as well as interest charged on the debt. >Billions in unchecked job keeper to profitable companies. Told they can keep the money. This is NOT the Australian government's fault. Blame CCP for COVID-19. > Half of the "Emergency" bushfire money still not given out, over 12 months later and 99% of that has gone to marginal independent and Liberal seats Wrong narrative. Federal ALP has very weak representation in the bush in the 1st place and bushfires occurred mostly in federal LNP held seats. > property valued at $3 mil purchased by the government for $30 mil Leftist narrative from leftist news media i.e. theguardian Counter: The Australian Federal Police are investigating the purchase of the Leppington Triangle land, later valued at only $3 million, with Infrastructure Department boss Simon Atkinson confirming two public servants face additional internal investigations over the deal. The Leppington Pastoral Company has said it "was not a willing seller at the time and the price received was considered fair and reasonable value given the significance of the land to our dairy business". There is no suggestion of any wrongdoing on the part of the Perich family. The audit report said government officials focused on "incentivising an unwilling seller to dispose of their land some 32 years in advance of when it was anticipated to be needed" for a potential second runway in a future stage of the new Nancy Bird Walton Airport development.
    1
  4769. 1
  4770. 1
  4771. 1
  4772.  @lukealexanderrobertsthefir458  Putin: “Speaking of security guarantees … our actions will not depend upon the negotiations, they will depend on the unconditional compliance with Russian security demands”. The main articles of Russian draft proposed agreement demand included eight articles with the following points: Article 1: the parties should not strengthen their security at the expense of Russia’s security; Article 2: the parties will use multilateral consultations and the NATO-Russia Council to address points of conflict; Article 3: the parties reaffirm that they do not consider each other as adversaries and maintain a dialogue; Article 4: the parties shall not deploy military forces and weaponry on the territory of any of the other states in Europe in addition to any forces that were deployed as of May 27, 1997; Article 5: the parties shall not deploy land-based intermediate- and short-range missiles adjacent to the other parties; Article 6: all member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization commit themselves to refrain from any further enlargement of NATO, including the accession of Ukraine as well as other States; Article 7: the parties that are member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization shall not conduct any military activity on the territory of Ukraine as well as other States in the Eastern Europe, in the South Caucasus and in Central Asia; and Article 8: the agreement shall not be interpreted as affecting the primary responsibility of the Security Council of the United Nations for maintaining international peace and security. ---------------- For Article 1, Israel sells missile technology to Eastern Europe while Russia sells missile technology to Israel's adversaries. For Article 3, Being labeled adversaries are based on action and behaviors. Finland, Poland, and the Baltic states have purchased Israeli missile technology and have historical issues with Imperialist Russia. For Article 4, Russia's demand to degrade NATO's Article V enforcement. For Article 5, Israel sells missile technology to Eastern Europe while Russia sells missile technology to Israel's adversaries. For Article 6, Russia demands to restrict counties in Eastern Europe's freedom of association. For Article 7, Russia's demand to degrade NATO's Article V enforcement for NATO members in Eastern Europe. For Article 8, Putin's bullshit statement.
    1
  4773. 1
  4774.  @alexsilent5603  >The US attacked Ukraine in 2013-14. FALSE. Date: Jan. 7, 2010 Yanukovych: Ukraine will remain a neutral state. "It’s certain that Ukraine was and will be non-aligned state… We strive neither to join NATO nor the [CIS]CSTO [Collective Security Treaty Organization]. We’ll maintain a neutral status," Yanukovych said in an interview with the Komsomolskaya Pravda in Ukraine newspaper. -------- The trigger for Euromaidan was Yanukovych initiated non-neutrality policies such as joining a trade block instead of executing Switzerland-style neutrality. UK leaving the EU and joining CPTPP proves freedom of association. *Before Euromaidan*, Russia, however, has successfully used political and economic leverage to dissuade Ukraine from signing the E.U. deal. In the months prior to the Vilnius summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a trade war with Kiev, blocking nearly all imports from Ukraine and cutting energy supplies to the country. In turn, this reduced Ukrainian exports by 25 percent and shrank the economy by 1.5 percent. Some trade background for the context From Tradebarrier Index (lower score = less trade barriers) New Zealand's tariff score is 2.92 Australia's tariff score is 3.03 UK's tariff score is 3.94 (after Brexit) Japan's tariff score is 4.05 US's tariff score is 4.54 Germany's tariff score is 4.88 EU's tariff score is 4.88 Russia's tariff score is 6.16 <-------- China's tariff score is 6.8 <------ Russia wants to maintain its higher trade protectionist policies.
    1
  4775. 1
  4776. 1
  4777. 1
  4778. 1
  4779. 1
  4780. 1
  4781. 1
  4782. 1
  4783. 1
  4784. 1
  4785. 1
  4786. 1
  4787. 1
  4788. 1
  4789. 1
  4790. 1
  4791. 1
  4792. 1
  4793. 1
  4794. 1
  4795. 1
  4796. 1
  4797. 1
  4798. 1
  4799. 1
  4800. 1
  4801. 1
  4802. 1
  4803. 1
  4804. 1
  4805. 1
  4806. 1
  4807. 1
  4808. 1
  4809. 1
  4810. 1
  4811. 1
  4812. 1
  4813. 1
  4814. 1
  4815. 1
  4816. 1
  4817. 1
  4818. 1
  4819. 1
  4820. 1
  4821. 1
  4822. 1
  4823. 1
  4824. 1
  4825. 1
  4826. 1
  4827. 1
  4828. 1
  4829. 1
  4830. 1
  4831. 1
  4832. 1
  4833. 1
  4834. 1
  4835. 1
  4836. 1
  4837. 1
  4838. 1
  4839. 1
  4840. 1
  4841. 1
  4842. 1
  4843. 1
  4844. 1
  4845. 1
  4846. 1
  4847. 1
  4848. 1
  4849. 1
  4850. 1
  4851. 1
  4852. 1
  4853. 1
  4854. 1
  4855. 1
  4856. 1
  4857. 1
  4858. 1
  4859. 1
  4860. 1
  4861. 1
  4862. 1
  4863. 1
  4864. 1
  4865. 1
  4866. 1
  4867. 1
  4868. 1
  4869. 1
  4870. 1
  4871. 1
  4872. 1
  4873. 1
  4874. 1
  4875. 1
  4876. 1
  4877. 1
  4878. 1
  4879. 1
  4880. 1
  4881. 1
  4882. 1
  4883. 1
  4884. 1
  4885. 1
  4886. 1
  4887. 1
  4888. 1
  4889. 1
  4890. 1
  4891. 1
  4892. 1
  4893. 1
  4894. 1
  4895. 1
  4896. 1
  4897. 1
  4898. 1
  4899. 1
  4900. 1
  4901. 1
  4902. 1
  4903. 1
  4904. 1
  4905. 1
  4906. 1
  4907. 1
  4908. 1
  4909. 1
  4910. 1
  4911. 1
  4912. 1
  4913. 1
  4914. 1
  4915. 1
  4916. 1
  4917. 1
  4918. 1
  4919. 1
  4920. 1
  4921. 1
  4922. 1
  4923. 1
  4924. 1
  4925. 1
  4926. 1
  4927. 1
  4928. 1
  4929. 1
  4930. 1
  4931. 1
  4932. 1
  4933. 1
  4934. 1
  4935. 1
  4936. 1
  4937. 1
  4938. 1
  4939. 1
  4940. 1
  4941. 1
  4942. 1
  4943. 1
  4944. 1
  4945. 1
  4946. 1
  4947. 1
  4948. 1
  4949. 1
  4950. 1
  4951. 1
  4952. 1
  4953. 1
  4954. 1
  4955. 1
  4956. 1
  4957. 1
  4958. 1
  4959. 1
  4960. 1
  4961. 1
  4962. 1
  4963. 1
  4964.  @smartchip  >Tim cast irl Do you assume I don't watch Tim Cast? Name-dropping is meaningless. Name the specific issue. >Scott Ritter Scott Ritter was an incompetent investigator who chicken out on investigating European businesses that profited from Iraqi WMDs. Scott Ritter, 50, was taken into custody immediately after Monroe County Judge Jennifer Sibum sentenced him to 18 to 66 months behind bars. It was the second time in eight years that Ritter, of Delmar, N.Y., found himself in legal trouble for trying to lure underage girls into illicit sex. ----- On 24 April 2013, the district court of The Hague sentenced Dutch businessman Frans van Anraat to payment of damages to the victims of mustard-gas attacks in Iraq and Iran in the 1980s. ----- Twenty Iraqi Kurds have taken legal action to expose French firms that supplied poison gas to Saddam Hussein in 1988. The plaintiffs were among the victims of a chemical weapon attack that killed 5,000 in the town of Halabja during the Iran-Iraq war. ----- Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq .
    1
  4965. 1
  4966. 1
  4967. 1
  4968. 1
  4969. 1
  4970. 1
  4971. 1
  4972. 1
  4973. 1
  4974. 1
  4975. 1
  4976. Every country has the right to operate a biolab and Ukraine did NOT invade another country. Basic pathology blood test requires a bio lab. Saddam's Iraq invaded two other countries i.e. Kuwait and Iran. Remember, Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum exchanged Ukraine's nuclear WMD for security assurances from US, UK, and Russia. France and China signed a watered-down Budapest Memorandum. Budapest Memorandum requires Ukraine to join Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty as part of Ukraine's nuclear WMD disarmament. Tucker is ignorant of Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum. Did you know Australia has similar security assurances like Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum and Australia does NOT have a NATO Article V level guarantee with the US? From 1950 to the 1960s, Australia detonated nuclear bombs as a joint partner with the UK. Australia has many Biolabs for agriculture, animal health, human health and 'etc'. --- Before Euromaidan, Russia started a trade war against Ukraine, forcing Yanukovych to sign a base rental extension agreement that breached Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 disallows foreign military bases after 2017. Read the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 which disallows foreign military bases after 2017. CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on 28 June 1996 Article 17 The location of foreign military bases shall not be permitted on the territory of Ukraine. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17. After 2017, Ukraine's constitution is incompatible with foreign military bases hosting either NATO or CSTO. If Yanukovych didn't sign the military base rental extension, Russia would be kicked out of Crimea. Putin's narrative is FALSE. Putin's pressure caused Yanukovych to make a mistake.
    1
  4977. 1
  4978. 1
  4979. 1
  4980. 1
  4981. 1
  4982. 1
  4983. 1
  4984. 1
  4985. 1
  4986. 1
  4987. 1
  4988. 1
  4989. 1
  4990. 1
  4991. 1
  4992. 1
  4993. 1
  4994. 1
  4995. 1
  4996. 1
  4997. 1
  4998.  @schoolofgrowthhacking  From GPAS__2021 pdf Pension (mandated nanny state saving funds) vs GDP ratio for 2021 Five Eyes/Five Passport Group, Australia, $2,333 billion, 174.8% (CPTPP member, Nordic model), Australia's mandated large-scale savings started in the1980s under the Labor government. Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (CPTPP member, Nordic model) United Kingdom, $3,564 billion, 135.1% (near CPTPP member, Nordic model) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (I don't have data for NZ) Notice the Five Eyes group has similar pension assets to GDP ratio results Large-scale mandated savings funds enable the government to issue government bonds and large-scale bond buyer markets! EU Finland, $279 billion, 104.3% (Nordic model) France, $166 billion, 6.5% Germany, $548 billion, 14.5% Italy, $231 billion, 12.5% <----- PIIGS (needs EU bailout). Netherlands, $1,900 billion, 214.4%, (Nordic model) Ireland, $197 billion, 49.4% <----- PIIGS (needs EU and UK bailout). Spain, $44 billion, 3.6% <----- PIIGS The EU lacks strategic savings coordination. Non-EU, Europe Switzerland, $1,163 billion, 164.3% (Nordic model) North America Mexico, $259 billion, 24.9% South America Brazil, $195 billion,14.3% Chile, $243 billion, 99.2% (CPTPP member) East Asia, South East Asia China, $285 billion, 1.9% Hong Kong, $199 billion, 58.3% Japan, $3,613 billion, 73.6% (CPTPP member) South Korea, $968 billion, 61.0% Malaysia, $279 billion, 83.0% (CPTPP member) South-Central Asia India, $184 billion, 7.1% -----
    1
  4999. 1
  5000. 1
  5001. 1
  5002.  @simongross3122  EfemzyEkun has Nigeria's nationalism and victimhood. Fools like EfemzyEkun haven't realized Australia's large-scale nanny state mandatory savings funds started in the 1980s. Australia adopted the British maritime mercantilism culture. Countries like Nigeria are badly governed. Nigeria was independent since October 1st, 1960. In 1885, British claims to a West African sphere of influence received recognition from other European nations at the Berlin Conference. The following year, it chartered the Royal Niger Company under the leadership of Sir George Taubman Goldie. By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the company had vastly succeeded in subjugating the independent southern kingdoms along the Niger River, the British conquered Benin in 1897, and, in the Anglo-Aro War (1901–1902), defeated other opponents. The defeat of these states opened up the Niger area to British rule. In 1900, the company's territory came under the direct control of the British government and established the Southern Nigeria Protectorate as a British protectorate and part of the British Empire, the foremost world power at the time. Before British colonization, at the beginning of the 19th century, Usman dan Fodio led a successful jihad against the Hausa Kingdoms founding the centralised Sokoto Caliphate. The empire with Arabic as its official language grew rapidly under his rule and that of his descendants, who sent out invading armies in every direction. The vast landlocked empire connected the east with the western Sudan region and made inroads down south conquering parts of the Oyo Empire (modern-day Kwara), and advanced towards the Yoruba heartland of Ibadan, to reach the Atlantic Ocean. The territory controlled by the empire included much of modern-day northern and central Nigeria. The sultan sent out emirs to establish a suzerainty over the conquered territories and promote Islamic civilization, the emirs in turn became increasingly rich and powerful through trade and slavery. By the 1890s, the largest slave population in the world, about two million, was concentrated in the territories of the Sokoto Caliphate. The use of slave labour was extensive, especially in agriculture.
    1
  5003. 1
  5004. 1
  5005. 1
  5006. 1
  5007. 1
  5008. 1
  5009. 1
  5010. 1
  5011. 1
  5012. 1
  5013. 1
  5014. 1
  5015. 1
  5016. 1
  5017. 1
  5018. 1
  5019. 1
  5020. 1
  5021. 1
  5022.  @ЮлияШелковникова-м9е  The war between Ukraine vs Russia is an echo of the past Kyiv vs Grand Duchy of Moscow Slavic wars. 1. 1863–1864 January uprising, Russian Empire crushed Polish, Lithuanian, and Ukrainian insurgents uprising. 2. Soviet–Ukrainian War occurred between 1917 to 1921, a war between the Ukrainian People's Republic vs the Bolsheviks i.e. the Ukrainian Soviet Republic and the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (modern-day Russian Federation). Bolsheviks' revolution started in Russia and Bolsheviks inherited Russian Empire's imperialist foreign policies. The economic system can change, but the Grand Duchy of Moscow's power nexus remained the same. These are "old world" issues. Before Euromaidan, Russia started a trade war against Ukraine, forcing Yanukovych to sign a base rental extension agreement that breached Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 disallows foreign military bases after 2017. Read the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 which disallows foreign military bases after 2017. CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on 28 June 1996 Article 17 The location of foreign military bases shall not be permitted on the territory of Ukraine. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17. After 2017, Ukraine's constitution is incompatible with foreign military bases hosting either NATO or CSTO. If Yanukovych didn't sign the military base rental extension, Russia would be kicked out of Crimea. Putin's narrative is FALSE. Putin's pressure caused Yanukovych to make a mistake. The US is the wildcard in the "old world" Slavic wars.
    1
  5023. 1
  5024. 1
  5025. 1
  5026. 1
  5027. 1
  5028. 1
  5029. 1
  5030. 1
  5031. 1
  5032. 1
  5033. 1
  5034. 1
  5035. 1
  5036. 1
  5037.  @Habib_Osman  From https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/report/downloadreportbyfilename?filename=Biofuels%20Annual_Canberra_Australia_11-7-2018.pdf NSW Government Biofuels Policy NSW introduced an ethanol biofuels mandate in 2017 to encourage broader use of ethanol and other biofuels in the State. Most cars in NSW that use unleaded petroleum (ULP) can use 10 percent ethanol-blended fuel. The NSW government has a legislated ethanol supply mandate of E6 for wholesale companies and a requirement for retailers with 20 or more outlets to offer ethanol product for sale. Under the NSW Biofuels Act 2007, a certain percentage of the total volume of petrol sold in NSW is required to be ethanol and a certain percentage is required to be biodiesel. The main objective of the policy is to support the development of a sustainable biofuels industry in NSW. The Act has a number of secondary objectives, including (a) improving air quality; (b) addressing climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions; (c) providing consumers with cheaper fuel options; (d) reducing the reliance of NSW on imported petroleum products; and (e) supporting regional development. The Biofuels Act is administered by the NSW Office of Fair Trading. The NSW E6 mandate (with exemptions) requires that ethanol must represent six percent of the total volume of petrol sold in NSW. A B2 mandate also exists, which requires two percent of the total volume of diesel sold to be biodiesel. A range of exemptions are provided to petrol retailers, which effectively lowers their ethanol requirements below the E6 mandate. The NSW government has sought to reduce the number of exemptions to the Biofuels Act to encourage greater use of fuel ethanol. Under an amendment to the Biofuels Act, all fuel retailers that sell three or more types of petrol and diesel and have sales above a certain threshold will need to comply with the ethanol mandate.
    1
  5038. 1
  5039. 1
  5040. 1
  5041. 1
  5042. 1
  5043. 1
  5044. 1
  5045. 1
  5046. 1
  5047. 1
  5048. 1
  5049. 1
  5050. 1
  5051. 1
  5052. 1
  5053. 1
  5054. 1
  5055. 1
  5056. 1
  5057. 1
  5058. 1
  5059. 1
  5060. 1
  5061. 1
  5062. 1
  5063. 1
  5064. 1
  5065. 1
  5066. 1
  5067. 1
  5068. 1
  5069. 1
  5070. 1
  5071. 1
  5072. 1
  5073. 1
  5074. 1
  5075. 1
  5076. 1
  5077. 1
  5078. 1
  5079. 1
  5080. 1
  5081. 1
  5082. 1
  5083. 1
  5084. 1
  5085. 1
  5086. 1
  5087. 1
  5088. 1
  5089. 1
  5090. 1
  5091. 1
  5092. 1
  5093. 1
  5094. 1
  5095. 1
  5096. 1
  5097. 1
  5098. 1
  5099. 1
  5100. 1
  5101. 1
  5102. 1
  5103.  @trumpbuddha1053  Note that China has a "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" which is known as CCP's protectionist list. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  5104. 1
  5105. 1
  5106. 1
  5107. 1
  5108. 1
  5109. 1
  5110. 1
  5111. 1
  5112. 1
  5113. 1
  5114. Note that China has a "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" which is known as CCP's protectionist list. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. ------------------------ China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  5115. 1
  5116. 1
  5117. 1
  5118. 1
  5119. 1
  5120. 1
  5121. 1
  5122. 1
  5123. 1
  5124.  @ivanbremer8662  Against https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=112611767758738&id=100070297463523 >Sports rorts, That's the leftist ABC link. Counter: From afr.com/politics/federal/bridget-mckenzie-rejects-politicisation-of-sports-rorts-funding-20210212-p571w9 Bridget McKenzie: no politicisation in ‘sports rorts’ funding >Timor-Leste bugging. You're supporting countries outside of Australia. It reveals your anti-Australia position. >Water rorts From watersource.awa.asn.au/business/assets-and-operations/foreign-ownership-of-water-assets-revealed/ The current situation with Australia's water entitlements. Also, read cdn.tspace.gov.au/uploads/sites/79/2019/02/2018-Register-of-foreign-ownership-Water-entitlements.pdf 19 percent of QLD's surface water entitlements are owned by foreigners. The report released in January 2019 by the Productivity Commission that found, the Murray-Darling Basin Authority should be broken up. From en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray-Darling_Basin_Authority Whilst the MDBA is a Commonwealth Government agency, an inter-governmental Murray‑Darling Basin Ministerial Council (Ministerial Council) acts in an advisory role in preparing and implementing the Basin Plan by the MDBA. The Ministerial Council comprises the Commonwealth Minister for Agriculture and Water Resources (who also chairs the Council) and one minister from each of the Basin states (Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria, and South Australia) and the Australian Capital Territory. QLD has a Labor government! >Robo debt The Government announced in May 2020 that they would commence paying back refunds from early July 2020. As at May 2021, the vast majority of refunds had been paid. The refund will include the repayment of any money paid towards a Robodebt as well as interest charged on the debt. >Billions in unchecked job keeper to profitable companies. Told they can keep the money. This is NOT the Australian government's fault. Blame CCP for COVID-19. > Half of the "Emergency" bushfire money still not given out, over 12 months later and 99% of that has gone to marginal independent and Liberal seats Wrong narrative. Federal ALP has very weak representation in the bush and bushfires occurred mostly in federal LNP held seats. Federal ALP dominates inner-city seats.
    1
  5125. 1
  5126. 1
  5127. 1
  5128. 1
  5129. 1
  5130. 1
  5131. 1
  5132. 1
  5133. 1
  5134. 1
  5135.  @SigmaMaleCountMartelus  Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq ----- The Iraqi WMD issue is not over.
    1
  5136. 1
  5137. 1
  5138. 1
  5139. 1
  5140. 1
  5141. 1
  5142. 1
  5143. 1
  5144. 1
  5145. 1
  5146. 1
  5147. 1
  5148. 1
  5149.  @TheShezu  Prove "world peace treaty". There is no such thing as a "world peace treaty". Poland and Baltic countries are against Russia. Finland is against Russia i.e. Finns purchased Israeli medium-range strike missiles. Estonia is against Russia i.e. Estonia purchased Israeli medium-range strike missiles. Poland purchased Israeli-designed Stunner interceptor missiles for its PAC3. Reminder, Russian Federation still has its Russian Empire's land area largely intact. You can't say the same for non-existent Spanish, French, and British empires. Your argument is hypocritical. Ukraine Constitution 1991, Article 17, disallows foreign military bases after 2017. According to former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, Ukraine's constitution forbids the country from hosting foreign military bases after 2017. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1991, Article 17. In 2018, President Petro Poroshenko's constitution amendment allowed temporary foreign military bases. Victoria Nuland herself doesn't have the power, but about 73% of the MPs—voted to "remove Viktor Yanukovych from the post of president of Ukraine" has the power. Don't assume Ukraine's president has absolute power when 73% of the MPs have voted to "remove Viktor Yanukovych from the post of president of Ukraine". >As all you know they have the world's best defense systems. S400 and more Rented S400 is useless in Syria. >Because Nato and America is expanding towards their boarder against 1991 treaty Prove "1991 treaty". Anyone who supports the current Russian's view on the two-sphere of influence zones in Europe only continues Nazi Germany-Soviet Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact i.e. the original plan that divides Europe into east/west sphere of influence zones. NATO does NOT support Nazi Germany-Soviet Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact version 2.0.
    1
  5150. 1
  5151.  @TheShezu  Putin: “Speaking of security guarantees … our actions will not depend upon the negotiations, they will depend on the unconditional compliance with Russian security demands”. The main articles of Russian draft proposed agreement demand included eight articles with the following points: Article 1: the parties should not strengthen their security at the expense of Russia’s security; Article 2: the parties will use multilateral consultations and the NATO-Russia Council to address points of conflict; Article 3: the parties reaffirm that they do not consider each other as adversaries and maintain a dialogue; Article 4: the parties shall not deploy military forces and weaponry on the territory of any of the other states in Europe in addition to any forces that were deployed as of May 27, 1997; Article 5: the parties shall not deploy land-based intermediate- and short-range missiles adjacent to the other parties; Article 6: all member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization commit themselves to refrain from any further enlargement of NATO, including the accession of Ukraine as well as other States; Article 7: the parties that are member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization shall not conduct any military activity on the territory of Ukraine as well as other States in the Eastern Europe, in the South Caucasus and in Central Asia; and Article 8: the agreement shall not be interpreted as affecting the primary responsibility of the Security Council of the United Nations for maintaining international peace and security. ---------------- For Article 1, Israel sells missile technology to Eastern Europe while Russia sells missile technology to Israel's adversaries. For Article 3, Being labeled adversaries are based on action and behaviors. Finland, Poland, and the Baltic states have purchased Israeli missile technology and have historical issues with Imperialist Russia. Russia plays "the great game" geopolitics longer than US's existence. For Article 4, Russia's demand to degrade NATO's Article V enforcement. Russia dictating terms against Three Seas Initiative member countries. For Article 5, Israel sells missile technology to Eastern Europe while Russia sells missile technology to Israel's adversaries. For Article 6, Russia demands to restrict counties in Eastern Europe's freedom of association. For Article 7, Russia's demand to degrade NATO's Article V enforcement for NATO members in Eastern Europe. Russia dictating terms against Three Seas Initiative member countries. For Article 8, Putin's bullshit statement.
    1
  5152. 1
  5153. 1
  5154. 1
  5155. 1
  5156. 1
  5157. 1
  5158. 1
  5159. 1
  5160. 1
  5161. 1
  5162. 1
  5163. 1
  5164. 1
  5165. 1
  5166. 1
  5167. 1
  5168. 1
  5169. 1
  5170. 1
  5171. 1
  5172. 1
  5173. 1
  5174. 1
  5175. 1
  5176. 1
  5177. 1
  5178. 1
  5179. 1
  5180. 1
  5181. 1
  5182. 1
  5183. 1
  5184. 1
  5185. 1
  5186. 1
  5187. 1
  5188. 1
  5189. 1
  5190. 1
  5191.  @jasonm949  Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country".[8] You're a hypocrite.
    1
  5192. 1
  5193. 1
  5194. 1
  5195. 1
  5196. 1
  5197. 1
  5198. 1
  5199. 1
  5200. 1
  5201. 1
  5202. 1
  5203. 1
  5204. 1
  5205. 1
  5206. 1
  5207. 1
  5208. 1
  5209. 1
  5210. 1
  5211. 1
  5212.  @CEOofSleep  Venezuela declared a trade war against US companies' Venezuela hardware assets nationalization (aka state-sponsored stealing). The US has executed its socialist trade protection against Venezuela's socialist trade war. Countries like Australia, Canada, the UK, and the US have large nanny state-style mandated savings via pension funds. Australia's nanny state pension funds have outgunned Venezuela on socialist nanny state-mandated savings. From GPAS__2021 pdf Pension (forced savings) funds vs GDP ratio for 2021 Five Eyes/Five Passport Group, Australia, $2,333 billion, 174.8% (CPTPP member) Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (CPTPP member) United Kingdom, $3,564 billion, 135.1% (near CPTPP member) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (I don't have data for NZ) Notice the Five Eyes group has similar pension assets to GDP ratio results EU Finland, $279 billion, 104.3% France, $166 billion, 6.5% Germany, $548 billion, 14.5% Italy, $231 billion, 12.5% <----- PIIGS Netherlands, $1,900 billion, 214.4%, EU is promoting the Netherlands as a UK replacement. Ireland, $197 billion, 49.4% <----- PIIGS Spain, $44 billion, 3.6% <----- PIIGS The EU lacks strategic savings coordination. Non-EU, Europe Switzerland, $1,163 billion, 164.3% North America Mexico, $259 billion, 24.9% South America Brazil, $195 billion,14.3% Chile, $243 billion, 99.2% (CPTPP member) East Asia, South East Asia China, $285 billion, 1.9% Hong Kong, $199 billion, 58.3% Japan, $3,613 billion, 73.6% (CPTPP member) South Korea, $968 billion, 61.0% Malaysia, $279 billion, 83.0% (CPTPP member) South-Central Asia India, $184 billion, 7.1% GTFO.
    1
  5213. 1
  5214. 1
  5215. 1
  5216. 1
  5217. 1
  5218. 1
  5219. 1
  5220. 1
  5221. 1
  5222. 1
  5223. 1
  5224. 1
  5225. 1
  5226. 1
  5227. 1
  5228. 1
  5229. 1
  5230. 1
  5231. 1
  5232. 1
  5233. 1
  5234. 1
  5235. 1
  5236. 1
  5237. 1
  5238. 1
  5239. 1
  5240. 1
  5241. USA production is more than 4 times since the US was the only nation to mass-produced aircraft carriers. Germany Tiger I tank's 1,347 units x 44 tons = 59,268 tons Tiger II tank has 492 units x 68 tons = 33,456 tons Panther tank has 6000 units x 44 tons = 264,000 tons Panzer IV has 8,553 unit x 25 tons = 213,825 tons Total: 570,549 tons Czech's Panzer 38(t) has 1414 units x 10 tons = 141,40 tons Reallocating Tiger I and Tiger II tonnage into Panther would yield another 2107 Panther units. Germany will still lose WW2. USA M26 tanks has 2,212 units x 44 tons = 97,328 tons M26 has 90 mm gun. M4 tanks has 49,234 units x 33 tons = 1,624,722, Russian T34 tanks has similar number. M10 tank destroyer has 6,406 units x 29 tons = 185,774 tons M18 tank destroyer has 2,507 units x 39 tons = 97,773 tons M36 tank destroyer has 2,324 units x 29 tons = 67,396 tons M36 has 90 mm gun. Sub-Total: 2,072,993 tons M4 Sherman Firefly (UK) has 2,200 units x 35 tons = 77,000 tons. Firefly takes on Tiger I and Panther tanks. The US has both quality (M26) and numbers (M4). A significant amount of the US Army's tonnage was against the German army. The US has the following aircraft carrier production 24 Essex-class fleet carriers with 90 to 110 aircraft each. 650,400 tons for Essex-class. 21 Commencement Bay class with 228,900 tons 50 Casablanca-class with 390,000 tons. 45 Bogue-class with 747,900 tons 3 Yorktown-class fleet carriers with 59,400 tons Sub-Total: 3,798,645 tons Modern-day USN aircraft carrier tonnage is just about 1,460,000 tons. Grand Total: 5,871,638 tons
    1
  5242. 1
  5243. 1
  5244. 1
  5245. 1
  5246. 1
  5247. 1
  5248. 1
  5249. 1
  5250. 1
  5251. 1
  5252. 1
  5253. 1
  5254. 1
  5255. 1
  5256. 1
  5257. @Runaway Puppet The Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". --------------- In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical. USSR's proxy attempted to remove Chile's check-and-balance Congress system. USSR's proxy attempted to concentrate political power into a single entity (individual and political party).
    1
  5258. @Runaway Puppet China has established foreign police stations across the world that are told to be closed down by foreign governments. China's "little green men" have inferred in medical supplies in Australia during 1st wave of COVID-19. China has engaged in territorial disputes based on Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng). The Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng) were a series of military campaigns launched by the Qing dynasty of China in the mid–late 18th century during the reign of the Qianlong Emperor (r. 1735–1796). They included three to enlarge the area of Qing control in Inner Asia: two against the Dzungars (1755–1757) and the "pacification" of Xinjiang (1758–1759). The other seven campaigns were more in the nature of police actions on frontiers already established: two wars to suppress the Gyalrong of Jinchuan, Sichuan, another to suppress the Taiwanese Aboriginals (1787–88), and four expeditions abroad against the Burmese (1765–1769), the Vietnamese (1788–1789), and the Gurkhas on the border between Tibet and Nepal (1790–1792), with the last counting as two. President Xi's argument is based on historical Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng). Xi's China has a territorial dispute with Vietnam. Xi's China has a territorial dispute with Taiwan. Xi's China has a territorial dispute with India (near Tibet and Nepal). Xi's China has a territorial dispute with the Philippines. Xi's China has a territorial dispute with Japan. This old world existed before the US became a superpower. China and Russia think that communism clean slate of their imperialist colonial past.
    1
  5259. 1
  5260. 1
  5261. 1
  5262. 1
  5263. 1
  5264. 1
  5265. 1
  5266. 1
  5267. 1
  5268. 1
  5269. 1
  5270. 1
  5271. 1
  5272. 1
  5273. 1
  5274. 1
  5275. 1
  5276. 1
  5277. 1
  5278. 1
  5279. 1
  5280. 1
  5281. 1
  5282. 1
  5283. 1
  5284. 1
  5285. 1
  5286.  @buildmotosykletist1987  The Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng) were a series of military campaigns launched by the Qing dynasty of China in the mid–late 18th century during the reign of the Qianlong Emperor (r. 1735–1796). They included three to enlarge the area of Qing control in Inner Asia: two against the Dzungars (1755–1757) and the "pacification" of Xinjiang (1758–1759). The other seven campaigns were more in the nature of police actions on frontiers already established: two wars to suppress the Gyalrong of Jinchuan, Sichuan, another to suppress the Taiwanese Aboriginals (part of an Austronesian group,1787–88), and four expeditions abroad against the Burmese (1765–1769), the Vietnamese (partly Austronesian group, 1788–1789), and the Gurkhas on the border between Tibet and Nepal (1790–1792), with the last counting as two. On the eve of the 1894 Sino-Japanese War, about 45 percent of the island was administered under the Manchus Qing administration (Imperial China) while the remaining was populated by Taiwanese aborigines. During the 4th Sino-Burmese Wars starting in 1768, Imperial China invaded the Kingdom of Burma. Burma hired European musketeers and gunners, hence Burma allied itself with the rising French Empire against Imperial China's invasion. Imperial China's imperialist conquest led to kinetic engagement with other powers. President Xi's argument is based on historical Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns. Territorial disputes around Xi's China are based on Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns. In the 20th century, at the lowest point in the Philippines (Austronesian majority) and the US relationship, the Philippines lost territory to China. Feelings are useless without firepower to back them i.e. mostly disarmed Philippines military model is useless (blame Cory Aquino). China's action on Mischief Reef started around 1995, shortly after the US left Clark airbase in Subic. There is nothing new under the sun.
    1
  5287. 1
  5288. 1
  5289. 1
  5290. 1
  5291. 1
  5292. 1
  5293. 1
  5294. 1
  5295. 1
  5296. 1
  5297. 1
  5298. 1
  5299. 1
  5300. 1
  5301. 1
  5302. 1
  5303. 1
  5304. 1
  5305. 1
  5306. 1
  5307. 1
  5308. 1
  5309. 1
  5310. 1
  5311. 1
  5312. 1
  5313. 1
  5314. 1
  5315. 1
  5316. 1
  5317. 1
  5318. 1
  5319. 1
  5320. 1
  5321. 1
  5322. 1
  5323. 1
  5324.  @ovincent35  False narrative. China's rare earth near-monopoly was built on SOE (State-Owned Enterprise) which drove private competitors from the market. Rare earth is important for the electronics component production logistics chain. From Graphite Publications article from 2010. Title: Will chinas Outrageous Rare Earth Monopoly Persist Year Date: 2010. Heavy importers of these REEs such as the U.S., Germany, and Japan believe these rationales disguise China’s true exploitative motive: to force foreign factories to move to China to keep their costs low and their supply high Second, importing countries have been concerned with the agglutination of Chinese mining companies in what appears to be a calculated move to make China’s monopoly even more monopolistic. Most prominently, Bao Gang Rare Earth (BGRE), a state-owned REE company forcibly merged with four smaller companies and numerous smaller companies were shut down to create a monopoly in Northern China which accounts for two-thirds of China’s output. Moreover, China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) decreed minimum production thresholds for domestic companies in early August 2012, essentially truncating the smallest REE producers as well as with 20% of China’s rare earths capacity. Third, Chinese companies have determinedly acted to protect their monopoly by buying potential international rivals. Lynas Corp., an Australian company displayed plans to open a new REE mine when in May 2009, a company owned by the Chinese government swooped in with a $366 million bid and bought a majority stake in it.
    1
  5325.  @ovincent35  From Forbes, Title: Protectionism May Be Rising Around The World, But In China It Never Went Away Year Date: 2016 Promises unkept? Since joining the WTO in 2001, China has repeatedly insisted that it will live up to those undertakings made on entry. In particular, the use of currency manipulation has been identified by the US as a breech of the commitment to end price controls for the purposes of protecting domestic industries. This became a major political issue from 2005 onwards, and has only recently subsided because it is assumed that the RMB is slightly overvalued on the market. Nevertheless, for years it was deliberate policy for the PBoC to accumulate US Dollars and suppress the exchange rate for the RMB, resulting in exactly the price distortions China had committed to eliminate in 2001, and fuelling an enormous trade surplus with the US, which persists and expands to this day. Furthermore TRIPS implementation has been given some effect on paper, but has made little progress when it comes to 'enforcement.' This is (according to the WTO) as recently as February 2015, fully 14 years after TRIPS was supposed to be already in effect. The US Trade Representative produces an annual report to Congress on China's WTO compliance which leaves little room to conclude they have so far lived up to their accession commitments. The most recent several-hundred-page document - produced in December 2015 - recites a long list of small measures, committees established, announcements made and new administrative complications faced, all continuing disputes over an agreement theoretically in effect since 2001. Although, therefore, protectionism is rising around the world, it is also true to say that existing practices of protectionism have not fallen in the way that they should have since China's accession to the WTO in 2001. Because of this lack of progress in easing trade, the extended period of currency manipulation, the lack of observance of TRIPS and the sheer administrative resistance exporters face when trying to get their products into China, we now face of world of highly unbalanced trade, and rising mistrust. And it is this that is leading to rising protectionism; the simple fact that it never went away.
    1
  5326. 1
  5327. 1
  5328.  @ovincent35  Against Chomsky's Iraq subject Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq ----- You're the real idiot.
    1
  5329. 1
  5330. 1
  5331. 1
  5332. 1
  5333. 1
  5334. 1
  5335. 1
  5336. 1
  5337.  @ovincent35  Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq ------
    1
  5338. 1
  5339. 1
  5340. 1
  5341. 1
  5342. 1
  5343. 1
  5344. 1
  5345. 1
  5346. 1
  5347. 1
  5348. 1
  5349. 1
  5350. 1
  5351. 1
  5352. 1
  5353. 1
  5354. 1
  5355. 1
  5356. 1
  5357. 1
  5358. 1
  5359. 1
  5360. 1
  5361. 1
  5362. 1
  5363. 1
  5364. 1
  5365. 1
  5366. 1
  5367. 1
  5368.  @paoloorate2265  On 24 April 2013, the district court of The Hague sentenced Dutch businessman Frans van Anraat to payment of damages to the victims of mustard-gas attacks in Iraq and Iran in the 1980s. ---- Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government (since its formation) had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq
    1
  5369. 1
  5370. 1
  5371. 1
  5372. 1
  5373. 1
  5374. 1
  5375. 1
  5376. 1
  5377. 1
  5378. 1
  5379. 1
  5380. 1
  5381. 1
  5382. 1
  5383. 1
  5384. 1
  5385. 1
  5386. 1
  5387. 1
  5388.  @kadikagbay9217  The Philippines-Indonesia Maritime Border Agreement was signed in 2019. Bilateral cooperation between Indonesia and the Philippines experiences a major uplift. One of the developments accomplished is the completion of the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) Boundary ratification process between both countries. The news was conveyed by President Joko Widododuring a bilateral meeting with President Rodrigo R Duterte of the Philippines on the sidelines of the 34th ASEAN Summit in Athenee Hotel, Bangkok, Thailand, on Saturday night (22/6). “I appreciate the smooth completion of the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) boundary ratification process between Indonesia and the Philippines," said the President. Foreign Ministers of the two countries plan to exchange the ratification documents in Jakarta next August 2019. This ratification will provide legal certainty to law enforcement and improve maritime sector cooperation. “I suggest we each assign our team to immediately commence the negotiation on Continent Shelf," said President Jokowi. Continuing on bilateral issues, President Jokowi communicated the plan of the country's private sector to intensify trade and investment in the Philippines. “I also hope that Your Excellency's granting on the exemption of Indonesian instant coffee and ceramic products from the price-based special safeguard list," he continued. Another issue discussed by President Jokowi was the Indo-Pacific cooperation. “I highly appreciate the support and contribution given by the Philippines to the development of the 'ASEAN Outlook on Indo-Pacific Cooperation'," he said. At the beginning of the meeting, the President also expressed his appreciation for the Filipino Government's help in the release of Indonesian hostages. “I believe Your Excellency agrees that we will continue to tighten security cooperation, including in Sulu Sea and the surrounding areas," said President Jokowi. (Source: Presidential Secretariat)​ ---- Your "You have a Reading Comprehension Problem" assertion is bullshit.
    1
  5389. 1
  5390. 1
  5391. 1
  5392. 1
  5393. 1
  5394. 1
  5395. 1
  5396. 1
  5397. 1
  5398. 1
  5399. 1
  5400. 1
  5401. 1
  5402. 1
  5403. 1
  5404. 1
  5405. 1
  5406. 1
  5407. 1
  5408.  @rathindrasarkar3238  Azerbaijan switched from the Cyrillic to the Latin alphabet in 1991, just after the fall of the Soviet Union, while Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan made the change in 1993. Kazakstan switched from the Cyrillic to the Latin alphabet in 2017 to avoid ethnic war by selecting an outside alphabet system. Three decades since declaring independence from the Soviet Union, Kazakhstan is finally about to ditch the Cyrillic alphabet. At the end of January 2021, the Kazakh government finally announced plans to transition the country’s written language to a Latin-based alphabet after almost two decades of delays. While the change is evidence that the slow, steady decline of Russian influence in the country, both linguistic and political, is shifting into its final phase, the diverse ethnic make-up of the country – which has a substantial ethnic Russian population – means the process is likely to be met with a great deal of hostility. Kazakhstan possesses a large community of Russians – around 25 percent of the country’s 18.75 million people – and Russian is spoken by more than 90 percent of the population. In the immediate aftermath of independence, Kazakh replaced Russian as the primary language of education, and Kazakh-language films and television programmes related to the country’s nomadic culture and traditions were widely promoted. Despite this, only 66 percent of the population are thought to be fluent speakers of Kazakh. The government now wants to put Russian on the same level as English, a foreign language, but still an important one, part of what it calls a trilingual education system aimed at “increasing the competitiveness of Kazakhs in the world arena”.
    1
  5409. 1
  5410. 1
  5411. 1
  5412. 1
  5413. 1
  5414. 1
  5415. 1
  5416.  @terminslator  CPC is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about the West's reciprocal protectionist advocacy e.g. Foreign entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  5417. 1
  5418. 1
  5419. 1
  5420. 1
  5421. 1
  5422. 1
  5423. 1
  5424. 1
  5425. 1
  5426. 1
  5427. 1
  5428. 1
  5429. 1
  5430. 1
  5431. 1
  5432. 1
  5433. 1
  5434. 1
  5435. 1
  5436. 1
  5437.  @Nathanos355  >Most of the conflicts of the modern world were inherited from the criminal actions of England, FALSE. India and Pakistan were part of the Islamic Mughal Empire. The Maratha Empire replaced the Mughal Empire. The Maratha Empire was founded in 1674 by Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj the Bhosle dynasty. Shivaji Maharaj led resistance efforts to free the Hindus from the Mughals and the Muslim Sultanate of Bijapur and established the rule of the Hindus. The Maratha Empire soon allied with the British East India Company (based in the Bengal Presidency) against Islamic Mysore in the Anglo-Mysore Wars. After the British East India Company had suffered defeat against Mysore in the first two Anglo-Mysore Wars, the Maratha cavalry assisted the British in the last two Anglo-Mysore Wars from 1790 onwards, eventually helping the British conquer Mysore in the Fourth Anglo-Mysore War in 1799. After the British East India Company's conquest, however, the Marathas launched frequent raids in Mysore to plunder the region, which they justified as compensation for past losses to Tipu Sultan. Around 1775, the relationship between the British East India Company and the Maratha Empire degraded into a hot war, which started with the British East India Company intervening in a succession struggle in Pune. The British Raj was the rule of the British Crown on the Indian subcontinent; it is also called Crown rule in India, or Direct rule in India, and lasted from 1858 to 1947. The British government dismantled the British East India Company. ---- The aggressor is the Islamic invaders that existed before the British East India Company's arrival.
    1
  5438.  @siddhartagoutama4140  >Most of the conflicts of the modern world were inherited from the criminal actions of England, FALSE. The Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng) were a series of military campaigns launched by the Qing dynasty of China in the mid–late 18th century during the reign of the Qianlong Emperor (r. 1735–1796). President Xi's argument is based on historical Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng). They included three to enlarge the area of Qing control in Inner Asia: two against the Dzungars (1755–1757) and the "pacification" of Xinjiang (1758–1759). The other seven campaigns were more in the nature of police actions on frontiers already established: two wars to suppress the Gyalrong of Jinchuan, Sichuan, another to suppress the Taiwanese Aboriginals (1787–88), and four expeditions abroad against the Burmese (1765–1769), the Vietnamese (1788–1789), and the Gurkhas on the border between Tibet and Nepal (1790–1792), with the last counting as two. Imperial China had an imperialist conquest of Vietnam and Japan. Imperial Japan returned the favor against China. During the Sino-Burmese Wars, Imperial China invaded the Konbaung dynasty of Burma (Myanmar) multiple times. During the 4th Sino-Burmese Wars starting in 1768, Imperial China invaded the Kingdom of Burma. Burma hired European musketeers and gunners, hence Burma allied itself with the rising French Empire against Imperial China's invasion. Imperial China is an imperialist power that led to the engagement with European imperialist empires. China's conflict with Vietnam has drawn in the Philippines and Malaysia.
    1
  5439. 1
  5440. 1
  5441. 1
  5442. 1
  5443. 1
  5444. 1
  5445. 1
  5446. 1
  5447. 1
  5448. 1
  5449.  @paulchiu596  https://www.forbes.com/sites/douglasbulloch/2016/10/12/protectionism-may-be-rising-around-the-world-but-in-china-it-never-went-away/#5dc3f5df73da Protectionism May Be Rising Around The World, But In China It Never Went Away Promises unkept? Since joining the WTO in 2001, China has repeatedly insisted that it will live up to those undertakings made on entry. In particular, the use of currency manipulation has been identified by the US as a breech of the commitment to end price controls for the purposes of protecting domestic industries. This became a major political issue from 2005 onwards, and has only recently subsided because it is assumed that the RMB is slightly overvalued on the market. Nevertheless, for years it was deliberate policy for the PBoC to accumulate US Dollars and suppress the exchange rate for the RMB, resulting in exactly the price distortions China had committed to eliminate in 2001, and fuelling an enormous trade surplus with the US, which persists and expands to this day. Furthermore TRIPS implementation has been given some effect on paper, but has made little progress when it comes to 'enforcement.' This is (according to the WTO) as recently as February 2015, fully 14 years after TRIPS was supposed to be already in effect. The US Trade Representative produces an annual report to Congress on China's WTO compliance which leaves little room to conclude they have so far lived up to their accession commitments. The most recent several-hundred-page document - produced in December 2015 - recites a long list of small measures, committees established, announcements made and new administrative complications faced, all continuing disputes over an agreement theoretically in effect since 2001. Although, therefore, protectionism is rising around the world, it is also true to say that existing practices of protectionism have not fallen in the way that they should have since China's accession to the WTO in 2001. Because of this lack of progress in easing trade, the extended period of currency manipulation, the lack of observance of TRIPS and the sheer administrative resistance exporters face when trying to get their products into China, we now face of world of highly unbalanced trade, and rising mistrust. And it is this that is leading to rising protectionism; the simple fact that it never went away. ----------------------------
    1
  5450. 1
  5451. 1
  5452. 1
  5453. 1
  5454. 1
  5455. 1
  5456. 1
  5457. 1
  5458. 1
  5459. 1
  5460. 1
  5461. 1
  5462. 1
  5463. 1
  5464. 1
  5465. 1
  5466.  @Oliveir51  > sell their USD reserves massively From GPAS__2021 pdf Pension (mandated nanny state saving funds) vs GDP ratio for 2021 Five Eyes/Five Passport Group, Australia, $2,333 billion, 174.8% (CPTPP member, Nordic model), Australia's mandated large-scale savings started in the1980s under the Labor government. Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (CPTPP member, Nordic model) United Kingdom, $3,564 billion, 135.1% (near CPTPP member, Nordic model) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (I don't have data for NZ) Notice the Five Eyes group has similar pension assets to GDP ratio results Large-scale mandated savings funds enable the government to issue government bonds and large-scale bond buyer markets! EU Finland, $279 billion, 104.3% (Nordic model) France, $166 billion, 6.5% Germany, $548 billion, 14.5% Italy, $231 billion, 12.5% <----- PIIGS Netherlands, $1,900 billion, 214.4%, (Nordic model) Ireland, $197 billion, 49.4% <----- PIIGS Spain, $44 billion, 3.6% <----- PIIGS The EU lacks strategic savings coordination. Non-EU, Europe Switzerland, $1,163 billion, 164.3% (Nordic model) North America Mexico, $259 billion, 24.9% South America Brazil, $195 billion,14.3% Chile, $243 billion, 99.2% (CPTPP member) East Asia, South East Asia China, $285 billion, 1.9% Hong Kong, $199 billion, 58.3% Japan, $3,613 billion, 73.6% (CPTPP member) South Korea, $968 billion, 61.0% Malaysia, $279 billion, 83.0% (CPTPP member) South-Central Asia India, $184 billion, 7.1% Both India nor Russia are not in positioned to buy large-scale USD or invest in US government bonds.
    1
  5467. 1
  5468. 1
  5469. 1
  5470. 1
  5471. 1
  5472. 1
  5473. 1
  5474. 1
  5475. 1
  5476. 1
  5477. 1
  5478. 1
  5479. 1
  5480. 1
  5481. 1
  5482. 1
  5483. 1
  5484. 1
  5485. 1
  5486. 1
  5487. 1
  5488. 1
  5489. 1
  5490. 1
  5491. 1
  5492. 1
  5493. 1
  5494. CPC is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about the West's reciprocal protectionist advocacy e.g. Foreign entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  5495. 1
  5496. 1
  5497. 1
  5498. 1
  5499. 1
  5500. 1
  5501. 1
  5502. 1
  5503. 1
  5504. 1
  5505. 1
  5506. 1
  5507. 1
  5508. 1
  5509. 1
  5510. 1
  5511. 1
  5512. 1
  5513. 1
  5514. 1
  5515. 1
  5516. 1
  5517. 1
  5518. 1
  5519. 1
  5520. 1
  5521. 1
  5522. 1
  5523. 1
  5524. 1
  5525. 1
  5526. 1
  5527. 1
  5528. 1
  5529. 1
  5530. 1
  5531. 1
  5532. 1
  5533. 1
  5534. 1
  5535. 1
  5536.  @yt.personal.identification  https://www.forbes.com/sites/douglasbulloch/2016/10/12/protectionism-may-be-rising-around-the-world-but-in-china-it-never-went-away/#5dc3f5df73da Protectionism May Be Rising Around The World, But In China It Never Went Away Promises unkept? Since joining the WTO in 2001, China has repeatedly insisted that it will live up to those undertakings made on entry. In particular, the use of currency manipulation has been identified by the US as a breech of the commitment to end price controls for the purposes of protecting domestic industries. This became a major political issue from 2005 onwards, and has only recently subsided because it is assumed that the RMB is slightly overvalued on the market. Nevertheless, for years it was deliberate policy for the PBoC to accumulate US Dollars and suppress the exchange rate for the RMB, resulting in exactly the price distortions China had committed to eliminate in 2001, and fuelling an enormous trade surplus with the US, which persists and expands to this day. Furthermore TRIPS implementation has been given some effect on paper, but has made little progress when it comes to 'enforcement.' This is (according to the WTO) as recently as February 2015, fully 14 years after TRIPS was supposed to be already in effect. The US Trade Representative produces an annual report to Congress on China's WTO compliance which leaves little room to conclude they have so far lived up to their accession commitments. The most recent several-hundred-page document - produced in December 2015 - recites a long list of small measures, committees established, announcements made and new administrative complications faced, all continuing disputes over an agreement theoretically in effect since 2001. Although, therefore, protectionism is rising around the world, it is also true to say that existing practices of protectionism have not fallen in the way that they should have since China's accession to the WTO in 2001. Because of this lack of progress in easing trade, the extended period of currency manipulation, the lack of observance of TRIPS and the sheer administrative resistance exporters face when trying to get their products into China, we now face of world of highly unbalanced trade, and rising mistrust. And it is this that is leading to rising protectionism; the simple fact that it never went away.
    1
  5537. 1
  5538. 1
  5539. 1
  5540. 1
  5541. 1
  5542. 1
  5543. 1
  5544. 1
  5545. 1
  5546. 1
  5547. 1
  5548. 1
  5549. 1
  5550. 1
  5551. 1
  5552. 1
  5553. 1
  5554. 1
  5555. 1
  5556. 1
  5557. 1
  5558. 1
  5559. 1
  5560. 1
  5561. 1
  5562. 1
  5563. 1
  5564. 1
  5565. 1
  5566. 1
  5567. 1
  5568. 1
  5569. 1
  5570. 1
  5571. 1
  5572. 1
  5573. 1
  5574. 1
  5575. 1
  5576. 1
  5577. 1
  5578. 1
  5579. 1
  5580. 1
  5581. 1
  5582. 1
  5583. 1
  5584. 1
  5585. 1
  5586. 1
  5587. 1
  5588. 1
  5589. 1
  5590. 1
  5591. 1
  5592. 1
  5593. 1
  5594. 1
  5595. 1
  5596. 1
  5597. 1
  5598. 1
  5599. 1
  5600. 1
  5601. 1
  5602. 1
  5603. 1
  5604. 1
  5605. 1
  5606. 1
  5607. 1
  5608. 1
  5609. 1
  5610. 1
  5611. 1
  5612. 1
  5613. 1
  5614. 1
  5615. 1
  5616. 1
  5617. 1
  5618. 1
  5619. For Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum context, Russia, the US, and the UK confirmed their Ukraine becoming parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and effectively abandoning their nuclear arsenal to Russia and that they would: 1. Respect Ukrainian independence and sovereignty in the existing borders. 2. Refrain from the threat or the use of force against Ukraine. 3. Refrain from using economic pressure on Ukraine to influence their politics. 4. Seek immediate Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine if they "should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used". 5. Refrain from the use of nuclear arms against Ukraine. 6. Consult with one another if questions arise regarding those commitments. China and France gave somewhat weaker individual assurances in separate documents. Russia has exited Budapest Memorandum. The US and UK are fulfilling points 4 and 6 in accordance with Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum. Budapest Memorandum's security assurances are weaker than NATO's Article V and EU's Article 42.7 ---- Read the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 that disallows foreign military bases after 2017. CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on 28 June 1996 Article 17 The location of foreign military bases shall not be permitted on the territory of Ukraine. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17. After 2017, Ukraine's constitution is incompatible with foreign military bases hosting either NATO or CSTO. If Yanukovych didn't sign the military base rental extension, Russia would be kicked out of Crimea. Putin's narrative is FALSE.
    1
  5620. 1
  5621. 1
  5622. 1
  5623. 1
  5624. 1
  5625. 1
  5626. 1
  5627. 1
  5628. 1
  5629. 1
  5630. 1
  5631. 1
  5632. 1
  5633. 1
  5634. 1
  5635. 1
  5636. 1
  5637. 1
  5638. 1
  5639. 1
  5640. 1
  5641. 1
  5642. 1
  5643. 1
  5644. 1
  5645. 1
  5646. 1
  5647. 1
  5648. 1
  5649. 1
  5650. 1
  5651. 1
  5652. 1
  5653. 1
  5654. 1
  5655. 1
  5656. 1
  5657. 1
  5658. 1
  5659. 1
  5660. 1
  5661. 1
  5662. 1
  5663. 1
  5664. 1
  5665. 1
  5666. 1
  5667. 1
  5668. 1
  5669. 1
  5670. 1
  5671. 1
  5672. 1
  5673. 1
  5674. 1
  5675. 1
  5676. 1
  5677. 1
  5678. 1
  5679. 1
  5680. 1
  5681. 1
  5682. 1
  5683. 1. KMT is overreaching its territorial claim since on the eve of the 1894 Sino-Japanese War, about 45 percent of the island was administered under the Manchus Qing administration (Imperial China) while the remaining land area was populated by Taiwanese aborigines. 2. KMT was militarily defeated by CCP. KMT rejected CCP and it has runaway to Formosa. 3. KMT was politically defeated by partly aboriginal Taiwanese Tsai Ing-wen Democratic Progressive Party. ---- Chiang Kai-Shek Supplementing The Act Of Surrender 1945 excluded Manchuria, Formosa, and French Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude. Order Of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-Shek Supplementing The Act Of Surrender 1945 This is order No. 1 of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek to the Japanese forces in China, excluding Manchuria, Formosa, and French Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude, which were surrendered under the act of 9 September 1945. This order supplements the acts of surrender to the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers and his General Order No. 1. September 9, 1945 Order of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek supplementing the Act of Surrender 9 September 1945 Immediately following the signing of the Act of Surrender ending the war in the China Theatre, General Ho Ying-chen handed Order No. 1 of Generalissimo Chiang to Lieut. Gen. Okamura Yasutsugu as a supplement to the Act of Surrender. I. This is order No. 1 of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek to the Japanese forces in China, excluding Manchuria, Formosa, and French Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude, which were surrendered under the act of 9 September 1945. This order supplements the acts of surrender to the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers and his General Order No. 1.
    1
  5684. 1
  5685. 1
  5686. 1
  5687. 1
  5688. 1
  5689. 1
  5690. 1
  5691. 1
  5692. 1
  5693. 1
  5694. 1
  5695. 1
  5696. 1
  5697. 1
  5698. 1
  5699. 1
  5700. 1
  5701. 1
  5702. 1
  5703. 1
  5704. 1
  5705. 1
  5706. 1
  5707. 1
  5708. 1
  5709. 1
  5710. 1
  5711. 1
  5712. 1
  5713. 1
  5714. 1
  5715. 1
  5716. 1
  5717. 1
  5718.  @zorgonfire  >F-35 unfortunately is a total disaster Only US has a sizable F-35 fleet older than Block 3F. F-35 export customers have Block 3F. Keeping the F-35 Ahead of the Bad Guys by John A. Tirpak March 2019 <snip...> Although the F-35 can carry the new Long-Range Anti-Ship Missile, or LRASM, externally, Winter said the principal new anti-ship missiles coming in Block 4 are the JSOW C1 for the Navy and the Norwegian JSM. The program has “not been asked” about whether the stealthy LRASM can fit inside the F-35’s weapon bays, he said, nor has the Navy asked to integrate the SLAM-ER (Standoff Land Attack Missile-Extended Range) version of the Harpoon anti-ship missile. <...> Last October, then-Defense Secretary Jim Mattis directed the Air Force to increase mission capable rates for the F-22, F-16, and F-35 to at least 80 percent. At the time, the F-35 rate was 54 percent overall, but for 3F aircraft recently off the production line, the rate was better than 80 percent. Winter agreed that spare parts are the “long pole in the tent” for getting the F-35 fleet up to the 80 percent standard. “We have initiatives underway to increase spare parts production,” he said, including accelerating the rate at which parts can be repaired by the F-35 depot at Hill AFB, Utah. This will allow industry to concentrate on making more new parts, rather than fixing older ones, he said. The Air Force has until Sept. 30 to achieve the 80 percent mission capable rate, assuming the order stands under Acting Defense Secretary Patrick M. Shanahan or his successor. ------ Try again.
    1
  5719. 1
  5720. 1
  5721. 1
  5722. 1
  5723. 1
  5724. 1
  5725. 1
  5726. 1
  5727. 1
  5728. 1
  5729. 1
  5730. 1
  5731. 1
  5732. 1
  5733. 1
  5734. 1
  5735. 1
  5736. 1
  5737. 1
  5738. 1
  5739. 1
  5740. 1
  5741. 1
  5742. 1
  5743. 1
  5744. 1
  5745. 1
  5746. 1
  5747. 1
  5748. 1
  5749. 1
  5750. 1
  5751. 1
  5752. 1
  5753. 1
  5754. 1
  5755. 1
  5756. 1
  5757. 1
  5758. 1
  5759. 1
  5760. 1
  5761. 1
  5762. 1
  5763. 1
  5764. 1
  5765. 1
  5766. 1
  5767. 1
  5768. 1
  5769. 1
  5770. 1
  5771. 1
  5772. 1
  5773. 1
  5774. 1
  5775. 1
  5776. 1
  5777. 1
  5778. 1
  5779. 1
  5780. 1
  5781. 1
  5782. 1
  5783. 1
  5784. 1
  5785. 1
  5786.  @AlexandruAlic  The Chile example, Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". --------------- In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical. USSR's proxy attempted to remove Chile's check-and-balance Congress system. USSR's proxy attempted to concentrate political power into a single entity (individual and political party).
    1
  5787. 1
  5788. 1
  5789. 1
  5790. 1
  5791. 1
  5792. 1
  5793. 1
  5794. 1
  5795. 1
  5796. 1
  5797. 1
  5798. 1
  5799. 1
  5800. 1
  5801. 1
  5802. 1
  5803. 1
  5804. 1
  5805. 1
  5806. 1
  5807. 1
  5808. 1
  5809. 1
  5810. 1
  5811. 1
  5812. 1
  5813. 1
  5814. 1
  5815. 1
  5816. 1
  5817. 1
  5818. 1
  5819. 1
  5820. 1
  5821. 1
  5822. 1
  5823. 1
  5824. 1
  5825. 1
  5826. 1
  5827. 1
  5828. 1
  5829. 1
  5830. 1
  5831. 1
  5832. 1
  5833. 1
  5834. 1
  5835. 1
  5836. 1
  5837. 1
  5838. 1
  5839.  @genovayork2468  The Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". --------------- In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical.
    1
  5840. 1
  5841. 1
  5842. 1
  5843. 1
  5844. 1
  5845. 1
  5846. 1
  5847. 1
  5848. 1
  5849. 1
  5850. 1
  5851. 1
  5852. 1
  5853. 1
  5854. 1
  5855. 1
  5856. 1
  5857. 1
  5858. 1
  5859. 1
  5860. 1
  5861. 1
  5862. 1
  5863. 1
  5864. 1
  5865. 1
  5866. 1
  5867. 1
  5868. 1
  5869. 1
  5870. 1
  5871. 1
  5872. 1
  5873. 1
  5874. 1
  5875. 1
  5876. 1
  5877. 1
  5878. 1
  5879. 1
  5880. 1
  5881. 1
  5882. 1
  5883.  @vaibhav07  >They don't follow the spirit of the written letter either That's argument is NOT based on signed documents. Your argument is based on speculation, not based on facts. > Even at UN level, right before Iraq war in 2003 On 24 April 2013, the district court of The Hague sentenced Dutch businessman Frans van Anraat to payment of damages to the victims of mustard-gas attacks in Iraq and Iran in the 1980s. Iraq's WMD issue is NOT over and it's being processed in the European courts. ---- STROUDSBURG, Pa.—A former United Nations weapons inspector who exchanged explicit online messages with a detective posing as a 15-year-old girl and then performed a sex act on himself in front of a webcam was sentenced Wednesday to at least 1 1/2 years in state prison. Scott Ritter, 50, was taken into custody immediately after Monroe County Judge Jennifer Sibum sentenced him to 18 to 66 months behind bars. It was the second time in eight years that Ritter, of Delmar, N.Y., found himself in legal trouble for trying to lure underage girls into illicit sex. ---- United Nations weapons inspector Scott Ritter's creditability is dead. Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq
    1
  5884. 1
  5885. 1
  5886.  @vaibhav07  >here is the complete reply that Gorbachev gave. MG: I called this a big mistake from the very beginning. It was definitely a violation of the spirit of the statements and assurances made to us in 1990. These statements were made in the context of the negotiations on German reunification. As former Soviet Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze later put it, the idea of the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact dissolving and NATO taking in former Warsaw Pact members was beyond the imagination of the protagonists at the time. The dissolution of the Warsaw Pact and the end of the Soviet Union in 1991 later created a completely new situation, as the countries of Central and Eastern Europe were finally able to assert their sovereignty and define their own foreign and security policy goals. Latvia’s defense minister, Artis Pabriks: "If we were not now a member of NATO or the European Union, we would share the fate of Ukraine now. It would be guaranteed that Russia would invade us. Now they can’t do this because we are a member of NATO,” Just on a sidenote: Europeans including Russians do have a common fate: two World Wars. Russia's attempt to impose a dividing Europe by Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact version 2.0 will be not tolerated by NATO and the EU. US/UK/Poland/Romania/Bulgaria/Estonia/Latvia/Lithuania has unfinished WW2 business with the removal of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact!! ----- MG: The decision for the U.S. and its allies to expand NATO into the east was decisively made in 1993. False narrative. NATO enlargement started with the admission of the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland in 1999.
    1
  5887. 1
  5888. 1
  5889. 1
  5890. 1
  5891. 1
  5892. 1
  5893. 1
  5894. 1
  5895. 1
  5896. 1
  5897. 1
  5898. 1
  5899. 1
  5900. 1
  5901. 1
  5902. 1
  5903. 1
  5904. 1
  5905. 1
  5906. 1
  5907. 1
  5908. 1
  5909. 1
  5910.  @jedandreicalasan  >Did anyone this war the Philippine American war Not a major issue for the present human generation when the current Philippines has its independence. President Xi's argument is based on historical Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns. Territorial disputes around Xi's China are based on Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns. The Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng) were a series of military campaigns launched by the Qing dynasty of China in the mid–late 18th century during the reign of the Qianlong Emperor (r. 1735–1796). They included three to enlarge the area of Qing control in Inner Asia: two against the Dzungars (1755–1757) and the "pacification" of Xinjiang (1758–1759). The other seven campaigns were more in the nature of police actions on frontiers already established: two wars to suppress the Gyalrong of Jinchuan, Sichuan, another to suppress the Taiwanese Aboriginals (1787–88), and four expeditions abroad against the Burmese (1765–1769), the Vietnamese (1788–1789), and the Gurkhas on the border between Tibet and Nepal (1790–1792), with the last counting as two. During the 4th Sino-Burmese Wars starting in 1768, Imperial China invaded the Kingdom of Burma. Burma hired European musketeers and gunners, hence Burma allied itself with the rising French Empire against Imperial China's invasion. In modern times, China's imperialist actions against Vietnam have spread to Vietnam's neighbor i.e. Philippines. The old world conflict zones remain similar in modern times.
    1
  5911. 1
  5912. 1
  5913. 1
  5914. 1
  5915. 1
  5916. 1
  5917. 1
  5918. 1
  5919. 1
  5920. 1
  5921.  @Arangggg  https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/covid-19-genetic-network-analysis-provides-snapshot-of-pandemic-origins Study charts the 'incipient supernova' of COVID-19 through genetic mutations as it spread from China and Asia to Australia, Europe and North America Versions of ‘A’ were seen in Chinese individuals, and Americans reported to have lived in Wuhan, and mutated versions of ‘A’ were found in patients from the USA and Australia. Wuhan’s major virus type, ‘B’, was prevalent in patients from across East Asia. However, the variant didn’t travel much beyond the region without further mutations – implying a 'founder event' in Wuhan, or 'resistance' against this type of COVID-19 outside East Asia, say researchers. From https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2020/04/07/2004999117 has https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/early/2020/04/07/2004999117/F1.large.jpg Fig. 1. Phylogenetic network of 160 SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Node A is the root cluster obtained with the bat (R. affinis) coronavirus isolate BatCoVRaTG13 from Yunnan Province. Circle areas are proportional to the number of taxa, and each notch on the links represents a mutated nucleotide position. The sequence range under consideration is 56 to 29,797, with nucleotide position (np) numbering according to the Wuhan 1 reference sequence (8). The median-joining network algorithm (2) and the Steiner algorithm (9) were used, both implemented in the software package Network5011CS (https://www.fluxus-engineering.com/), with the parameter epsilon set to zero, generating this network containing 288 most-parsimonious trees of length 229 mutations. The reticulations are mainly caused by recurrent mutations at np11083. The 161 taxa (160 human viruses and one bat virus) yield 101 distinct genomic sequences. The phylogenetic diagram is available for detailed scrutiny in A0 poster format (SI Appendix, Fig. S5) and in the free Network download files.
    1
  5922. 1
  5923. 1
  5924. 1
  5925. 1
  5926. 1
  5927. 1
  5928. 1
  5929. 1
  5930. 1
  5931. 1
  5932. 1
  5933. 1
  5934. 1
  5935. 1
  5936. 1
  5937. 1
  5938. 1
  5939. 1
  5940. 1
  5941. 1
  5942. 1
  5943. 1
  5944. 1
  5945. 1
  5946. 1
  5947. 1
  5948. 1
  5949. 1
  5950. 1
  5951. 1
  5952. 1
  5953. 1
  5954. 1
  5955. 1
  5956. 1
  5957.  @timokohler6631  Timeline of Yugoslav breakup 22 January 1990: Slovenian, Croatian and Macedonian delegates abandon the last Congress of the Communist League of Yugoslavia. The Communist Party of Yugoslavia is dissolved. 1 July 1990: The Parliament of Slovenia votes to declare independence (but independence is not proclaimed). 1 October 1990: George Bush, in a meeting with the Yugoslav president of the Presidency, gives full support to Yugoslavia. 21 February 1991: After receiving news of the Slovenian parliament's decision to start legal actions for independence and for the possible creation of new union of independent states, the Croatian parliament makes a similar decision. 25 September 1991: Macedonia declares independence. 8 October 1991: Croatia declares independence from Yugoslavia. 2 December 1991: President of Macedonia sends an official letter to the presidents of the foreign governments asking for recognition of the independence of Macedonia. Immediately after that Greece starts military provocations on the Macedonian-Greece border. .. 19 December 1991: Germany announces that it will recognize Croatia on January 15, 1992, with or without the rest of the European Community. 23 December 1991: Germany becomes the first major power to recognize Croatia and Slovenia as independent states 15 January 1992: The European Community recognizes Slovenia and Croatia. ------------------- Without NATO, Germany would have done it alone and we would have another WW1 trigger i.e. Russia would have declared war against Germany as in WWI It's in Russia's interest to decouple North America's raw material security guarantees from mainland Europe that will enable Russia to win any war of attrition against France or Germany! Germany used NATO with North America's raw material security guarantees to further its own interest when it failed in WW1's goals. NATO was used to check Russia and avoid the WW1 trigger.
    1
  5958. 1
  5959. CPC is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about the West's reciprocal protectionist advocacy e.g. Foreign entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  5960. 1
  5961. 1
  5962. 1
  5963. 1
  5964. 1
  5965. 1
  5966. 1
  5967. 1
  5968. 1
  5969. 1
  5970. 1
  5971.  MaxSt Arlyn  https://supchina.com/2018/03/23/why-chinese-companies-crush-western-tech-giants-in-china/ For example, Bloomberg published an article earlier this month titled “China protectionism creates tech billionaires who protect Xi,” with the author stating, “That’s helped create thriving domestic giants, including Tencent Holdings Ltd. and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.” Mark Natkin, managing director of Beijing-based Marbridge Consulting, was quoted as saying, “As long as they remain protected in the China market, they’ll dominate and use that money to fund their global expansion.” https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/china-how-big-tech-learning-love-party Wang Xiaochuan, CEO of Sogou, a Tencent-backed search engine, explained this dynamic explicitly in a quote leaked in March of this year: We’re entering an era in which we'll be fused together. It might be that there will be a request to establish a Party committee within your company, or that you should let state investors take a stake, you know, as a form of mixed ownership https://www.afr.com/brand/chanticleer/chinese-tech-stocks-pose-an-investment-dilemma-20180815-h1410o Baidu became China's No.1 search engine partly because Google was outlawed. Tencent became the world's largest gaming company and owner of China's No.1 messaging system without needing to compete with Facebook's WhatsApp. Baidu and Tencent are prime examples of Chinese companies simply copying the successful business models created in Silicon Valley and then rolling them out without fear of competition at home. Alibaba, which built the world's largest online retailing business, was allowed to dominate China's small business lending without interference from foreigners or much competition from local government-owned entities.
    1
  5972. 1
  5973.  MaxSt Arlyn  The businesses are 1. Country Garden, a totally owned subsidiary of Country Garden Holdings, one of China’s largest property developers. 2. Risland, Risland Holdings is a Hong Kong-based multinational real estate conglomerate Employees of Greenland Australia, a subsidiary of the Chinese government-backed global property giant Greenland Group, were instructed to put their normal work on hold and source bulk supplies of essential medical items to ship back to China. In February Risland’s LinkedIn page showed pallet-loads of safety gear being stored in a warehouse ready for shipment. "90 tons of selective medical supplies… ready for the air transport direct from Sydney to Wuhan via corporate jet on Monday next week," said the company’s post. It's a Russian style "little green" style operation. https://www.smh.com.au/national/second-developer-flies-82-tonnes-of-medical-supplies-to-china-20200326-p54e8n.html These companies are proxies for CCP government. CCP back companies in Australia shipped medical supplies to China. It's a Russian style "little green" style operation. Medical supplies are not Nike shoes or Apple iPhones. https://www.smh.com.au/national/former-chinese-military-man-behind-export-of-tonnes-of-medical-supplies-20200330-p54f8a.html A former Chinese military officer worked with Chinese Communist Party agencies and a group with links to organised crime to export tonnes of Australian medical supplies to Wuhan at the height of the coronavirus epidemic there ----- https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-01/coronavirus-chinese-ppe-border-force-intercepted/12085908 Australia seizes faulty coronavirus protective equipment imported from China
    1
  5974. 1
  5975. 1
  5976. 1
  5977. 1
  5978. 1
  5979. 1
  5980. 1
  5981. 1
  5982. 1
  5983. 1
  5984. 1
  5985. 1
  5986. 1
  5987. 1
  5988. 1
  5989. 1
  5990. 1
  5991. 1
  5992. 1
  5993. 1
  5994. 1
  5995. 1
  5996. The Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority-governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". --------------- In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical. USSR's proxy attempted to remove Chile's check-and-balance Congress system. USSR's proxy attempted to concentrate political power into a single entity (individual and political party). The US has no problems with the Swedish-style nanny market led-socialism that is practiced in the CANZUK and Nordic groups.
    1
  5997. 1
  5998. 1
  5999. 1
  6000. 1
  6001. 1
  6002. 1
  6003. 1
  6004. 1
  6005. 1
  6006. 1
  6007. 1
  6008. 1
  6009. 1
  6010. 1
  6011. 1
  6012. 1
  6013. 1
  6014. 1
  6015. 1
  6016. 1
  6017. 1
  6018. 1
  6019. 1
  6020. 1
  6021. 1
  6022. 1
  6023. 1
  6024. 1
  6025. 1
  6026. 1
  6027. 1
  6028. 1
  6029. 1
  6030. 1
  6031. 1
  6032. 1
  6033. 1
  6034. 1
  6035. 1
  6036. 1
  6037. 1
  6038. 1
  6039. 1
  6040. 1
  6041. 1
  6042. 1
  6043. 1
  6044. 1
  6045. 1
  6046. 1
  6047. 1
  6048. 1
  6049. 1
  6050.  @baronvonlimbourgh1716  >Most european countries don't want to get entangled in the usa's crusade. That's a false narrative. 1. 1863–1864 January uprising, Russian Empire crushed Polish, Lithuanian, and Ukrainian insurgents uprising. 2. Soviet–Ukrainian War occurred between 1917 to 1921, a war between the Ukrainian People's Republic vs the Bolsheviks i.e. Ukrainian Soviet Republic and Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (modern-day Russian Federation). These "old world" issues have existed before the US being a superpower. Before Euromaidan, Russia successfully used political and economic leverage to dissuade Ukraine from signing the E.U. deal. In the months prior to the Vilnius summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a trade war with Kyiv, blocking nearly all imports from Ukraine and cutting energy supplies to the country. In turn, this reduced Ukrainian exports by 25 percent and shrank the economy by 1.5 percent. Ukraine Constitution 1991, Article 17, disallows foreign military bases after 2017. According to former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, Ukraine's constitution forbids the country from hosting foreign military bases after 2017. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1991, Article 17. After 2017, Ukraine's constitution is incompatible with foreign military bases hosting either NATO or CSTO. In 2018, President Petro Poroshenko's constitution amendment allowed temporary foreign military bases. 🤣😂😅 If Yanukovych didn't sign the military base rental extension, Russia would be kicked out of Crimea. You believed Putin's false narrative!
    1
  6051. 1
  6052. 1
  6053. 1
  6054. 1
  6055. 1
  6056. 1
  6057. 1
  6058. 1
  6059. 1
  6060. 1
  6061. 1
  6062.  @williamzk9083  1. FACTS: When the German Empire invaded Belgium in August 1914 in violation of the "Treaty of London of 1839", the British declared war on 4 August. Imperialist Germany invaded Belgium. The counterclaim should be blaming Austria-Hungary when Germany is stuck with its defense treaty with Austria-Hungary. The Marshall Plan (ultimately replaced by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) is the US's post-war method to repair West Germany instead of the French-British's harsh Treaty of Versailles which created an unstable social-economic situation in Germany. OECD factors in the social-economic situation for each of its member countries. Russia has been suspended from OECD. 2. FACTS: Your "Anglo British Naval Treaty of 1904" doesn't exist. Entente Cordiale was signed on April 8, 1904 and the agreement in no sense created an alliance and did not entangle Great Britain with a French commitment to Russia (1894). Entente Cordiale prepares the UK and French cooperation, by solving the issues between the two countries. 3. FACTS: There was "Anglo-French naval agreement of 19I2". "Anglo-French naval agreement of 19I2" would essentially give the French navy responsibility for guarding the Mediterranean, allowing Britain to concentrate its naval power in the North Sea against Germany. The UK has its own sovereign rights for war preparation just like Germany's war preparation. Anything less is hypocritical on your part. 4. Reminder, read the "Treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany" that limits modern Germany's troop numbers to 370,000. "Treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany" includes respect for Poland's territorial integrity just like Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum. Unlike Ukraine, Poland is a NATO member with Article V that commits the US/UK nuclear weapons usage in defense of NATO. France does not participate in NATO's nuclear planning mechanisms and its nuclear forces are not formally assigned to NATO. France may call upon its nuclear arsenal if there are threats to its neighbors or allies.
    1
  6063. 1
  6064. 1
  6065. 1
  6066. 1
  6067. 1
  6068. 1
  6069. 1
  6070. 1
  6071. 1
  6072. 1
  6073. 1
  6074. 1
  6075. 1
  6076. 1
  6077. 1
  6078. 1
  6079. 1
  6080. 1
  6081. 1
  6082. 1
  6083. 1
  6084. 1
  6085. 1
  6086. 1
  6087. 1
  6088. 1
  6089. 1
  6090. 1
  6091. 1
  6092. 1
  6093. 1
  6094. 1
  6095. 1
  6096. 1
  6097. 1
  6098. 1
  6099. 1
  6100. 1
  6101. 1
  6102. 1
  6103. 1
  6104. 1
  6105. 1
  6106. 1
  6107. 1
  6108. 1
  6109. 1
  6110. 1
  6111. 1
  6112. 1
  6113. 1
  6114. 1
  6115. 1
  6116. 1
  6117. 1
  6118. 1
  6119. 1
  6120. 1
  6121. 1
  6122. 1
  6123. 1
  6124. 1
  6125. 1
  6126. 1
  6127. 1
  6128. 1
  6129. 1
  6130. 1
  6131. 1
  6132. 1
  6133. 1
  6134. 1
  6135. 1
  6136. 1
  6137. 1
  6138. 1
  6139. 1
  6140. 1
  6141. 1
  6142. 1
  6143. 1
  6144. 1
  6145. 1
  6146. 1
  6147. 1
  6148. 1
  6149. 1
  6150. 1
  6151.  @oscarosullivan4513  >the fact that the USA and UK had Fascists galore That's a false narrative. Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country".[8] You're a hypocrite.
    1
  6152. 1
  6153. 1
  6154. 1
  6155. 1
  6156. 1
  6157. 1
  6158. 1
  6159. 1
  6160. 1
  6161. 1
  6162. 1
  6163. 1
  6164. 1
  6165. 1
  6166. 1
  6167. 1
  6168. 1
  6169. 1
  6170. 1
  6171. 1
  6172. 1
  6173. 1
  6174. 1
  6175. 1
  6176. 1
  6177. 1
  6178. 1
  6179. 1
  6180. 1
  6181. 1
  6182. 1
  6183. 1
  6184. 1
  6185. 1
  6186. 1
  6187. 1
  6188. 1
  6189. 1
  6190. 1
  6191. 1
  6192. 1
  6193. 1
  6194. 1
  6195. 1
  6196. 1
  6197. 1
  6198. 1
  6199. 1
  6200. 1
  6201. 1
  6202. 1
  6203. 1
  6204. 1
  6205.  @adrianhdragon718  >US-CHINA TRADE WAR begun by the Trump Administration back in early 2018 That's a false narrative. From SCMP Article date: May 2016 (BEFORE the Trump administration!). Title: Is China making life difficult for foreign companies? China welcomed them with open arms, but now overseas firms are complaining about the country’s increasingly hostile business environment as concerns rise over protectionism, forced technology transfers and tightening censorship ------ China's rare earth near-monopoly was built on SOE (State-Owned Enterprise) which drove private competitors from the market. Rare earth is important for the electronics component production logistics chain. From Graphite Publications article from 2010. Title: Will chinas Outrageous Rare Earth Monopoly Persist Year Date: 2010. Heavy importers of these REEs such as the U.S., Germany, and Japan believe these rationales disguise China’s true exploitative motive: to force foreign factories to move to China to keep their costs low and their supply high Second, importing countries have been concerned with the agglutination of Chinese mining companies in what appears to be a calculated move to make China’s monopoly even more monopolistic. Most prominently, Bao Gang Rare Earth (BGRE), a state-owned REE company forcibly merged with four smaller companies and numerous smaller companies were shut down to create a monopoly in Northern China which accounts for two-thirds of China’s output. Moreover, China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) decreed minimum production thresholds for domestic companies in early August 2012, essentially truncating the smallest REE producers as well as with 20% of China’s rare earths capacity. Third, Chinese companies have determinedly acted to protect their monopoly by buying potential international rivals. Lynas Corp., an Australian company displayed plans to open a new REE mine when in May 2009, a company owned by the Chinese government swooped in with a $366 million bid and bought a majority stake in it.
    1
  6206.  @adrianhdragon718  > The Arrest of the CFO of Huawei Meng Whenzou Note that China has a "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" which is known as CCP's protectionist list. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  6207. 1
  6208. 1
  6209. 1
  6210. 1
  6211. 1
  6212. 1
  6213. 1
  6214. 1
  6215. 1
  6216.  @hammadhussain9779  >u created fake grounds for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq FALSE. Iraq-Kurdish victims are winning European court battles against European companies that provided chemical components for Saddam's WMDs. LOL. In Iraq, Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq ---- According to the Iraqi-Kurdish regional government, Iraq's WMD exist.
    1
  6217. 1
  6218. 1
  6219. 1
  6220. 1
  6221. 1
  6222. 1
  6223. 1
  6224. 1
  6225. 1
  6226. 1
  6227. 1
  6228. 1
  6229. 1
  6230. 1
  6231. 1
  6232. 1
  6233. 1
  6234. 1
  6235. 1
  6236. 1
  6237. 1
  6238. 1
  6239. 1
  6240. 1
  6241. 1
  6242. 1
  6243. 1
  6244. 1
  6245. 1
  6246. 1
  6247. 1
  6248. 1
  6249. 1
  6250. 1
  6251. 1
  6252. 1
  6253. 1
  6254. 1
  6255. 1
  6256. 1
  6257. 1
  6258. 1
  6259. 1
  6260. 1
  6261. 1
  6262. 1
  6263. 1
  6264. 1
  6265. 1
  6266. 1
  6267. 1
  6268. 1
  6269. 1
  6270. 1
  6271. 1
  6272. 1
  6273. 1
  6274. 1
  6275. 1
  6276. 1
  6277. 1
  6278. 1
  6279. 1
  6280. 1
  6281. 1
  6282. 1
  6283. 1
  6284. 1
  6285. 1
  6286. 1
  6287. 1
  6288. 1
  6289. 1
  6290. 1
  6291. 1
  6292. 1
  6293. 1
  6294. 1
  6295. 1
  6296. 1
  6297. 1
  6298. 1
  6299. 1
  6300. 1
  6301. 1
  6302. 1
  6303. 1
  6304. 1
  6305. 1
  6306. 1
  6307. Note that China has a "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" which is known as CCP's protectionist list. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  6308. 1
  6309. 1
  6310. 1
  6311. 1
  6312. 1
  6313. 1
  6314. 1
  6315. 1
  6316. 1
  6317. 1
  6318. 1
  6319. 1
  6320. 1
  6321. 1
  6322. 1
  6323. 1
  6324. 1
  6325. 1
  6326. 1
  6327. 1
  6328. 1
  6329. 1
  6330. 1
  6331. 1
  6332. 1
  6333. 1
  6334. 1
  6335. 1
  6336. 1
  6337. 1
  6338. 1
  6339. 1
  6340. 1
  6341. 1
  6342. 1
  6343. 1
  6344. 1
  6345. 1
  6346. 1
  6347. 1
  6348. 1
  6349. 1
  6350. 1
  6351. 1
  6352. 1
  6353. 1
  6354. 1
  6355. 1
  6356. 1
  6357. 1
  6358. 1
  6359. 1
  6360.  @sheronbuytten7054  0. It reaffirms its interest in a peaceful settlement of the Taiwan question by the Chinese themselves, the text from the Nixon Foundation. Again, the 1972 Shanghai Communiqué has a condition i.e. peaceful settlement of the Taiwan question. 1. The US signed Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum that exchanged Ukraine's nuclear weapons (Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons) for security assurances. Russia's Budapest Memorandum security assurance is toilet paper. France and China signed a watered-down Budapest Memorandum with Ukraine. 2. Russia started a hot war against Ukraine. Russia's land grabbed Ukraine's five oblasts. Don't disturb when the opponent is making a mistake. Putin is the best salesman for NATO. 3. Which people? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0x1vJqRDppU Three Seas Initiative explained and they blame their less developed status on Russia! "Russian Warship, Go Fukc yourself." Repeated by the Latvian MP Rihards Kols. 4. 20181223/french-president-says-an-ally-must-be-reliable-after-us-syria-pullout-announcement Macron says 'an ally must be reliable' after US Syria pullout announcement. Macron's anger against Trump's US Syria pullout reveals the real background pusher against Syria e.g. EU. Look in the mirror Macron. "On 10 March 2011, France was the first country in the world to recognise the National Transitional Council as the legitimate government of Libya". Look in the mirror Macron. 5. Timeline of Yugoslav breakup 1 October 1990: George Bush, in a meeting with the Yugoslav president of the Presidency, gives full support to Yugoslavia. 19 December 1991: Germany announces that it will recognize Croatia on January 15, 1992, with or without the rest of the European Community. 23 December 1991: Germany becomes the first major power to recognize Croatia and Slovenia as independent states 15 January 1992: The European Community recognizes Slovenia and Croatia. The Russian narrative to decouple North America's raw material security guarantees from mainland Europe will enable Russia to win any war of attrition against Germany! Germany knows the narrative to detach Europe from North America's raw material security guarantees. Germany used NATO with North America's raw material security guarantees to further its own interest when it failed in WW1's goals. NATO was used to check Russia and avoid the WW1 trigger. Your narrative is Russian's POV. Hint: Ask Poland, Finland, and Baltic countries. 6. Refer to my counter point 4.
    1
  6361. 1
  6362.  @sheronbuytten7054  7. In 2019 China blocked Australia's and New Zealand's marine park proposals in Antarctica. It is the eighth year the proposal has been knocked back, with China and Russia voting the proposal down on previous occasions. This caused Australia to enlist help from the EU while New Zealand enlist help from the US. ------ President Xi's argument is based on historical Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns. Territorial disputes around Xi's China are based on Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns. The Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng) were a series of military campaigns launched by the Qing dynasty of China in the mid–late 18th century during the reign of the Qianlong Emperor (r. 1735–1796). They included three to enlarge the area of Qing control in Inner Asia: two against the Dzungars (1755–1757) and the "pacification" of Xinjiang (1758–1759). The other seven campaigns were more in the nature of police actions on frontiers already established: two wars to suppress the Gyalrong of Jinchuan, Sichuan, another to suppress the Taiwanese Aboriginals (1787–88), and four expeditions abroad against the Burmese (1765–1769), the Vietnamese (1788–1789), and the Gurkhas on the border between Tibet and Nepal (1790–1792), with the last counting as two. During the 4th Sino-Burmese Wars starting in 1768, Imperial China invaded the Kingdom of Burma. Burma hired European musketeers and gunners, hence Burma allied itself with the rising French Empire against Imperial China's invasion. Imperial China's imperialist conquest led to kinetic engagement with other powers. Look in the mirror.
    1
  6363. 1
  6364. 1
  6365. 1
  6366. 1
  6367. 1
  6368. 1
  6369. 1
  6370. 1
  6371. 1
  6372. 1
  6373. 1
  6374. 1
  6375. 1
  6376. 1
  6377. 1
  6378. 1
  6379. 1
  6380. 1
  6381. 1
  6382. 1
  6383. 1
  6384. 1
  6385. 1
  6386. 1
  6387. 1
  6388. 1
  6389. 1
  6390. 1
  6391. 1
  6392. 1
  6393. 1
  6394. 1
  6395. 1
  6396. 1
  6397. 1
  6398. 1
  6399. 1
  6400. 1
  6401. 1
  6402. 1
  6403. 1
  6404. 1
  6405. 1
  6406. 1
  6407. 1
  6408. 1
  6409. 1
  6410. 1
  6411. 1
  6412. 1
  6413. 1
  6414. 1
  6415. 1
  6416. 1
  6417. 1
  6418. 1
  6419. 1
  6420. 1
  6421. 1
  6422. 1
  6423. 1
  6424. 1
  6425. 1
  6426. 1
  6427. 1
  6428. 1
  6429. 1
  6430. 1
  6431. 1
  6432. 1
  6433. 1
  6434. 1
  6435. 1
  6436. 1
  6437. 1
  6438. 1
  6439. 1
  6440. 1
  6441. 1
  6442. 1
  6443. 1
  6444. 1
  6445. 1
  6446. 1
  6447. 1
  6448. 1
  6449. 1
  6450. 1
  6451. 1
  6452. 1
  6453. 1
  6454. 1
  6455. 1
  6456. 1
  6457. 1
  6458. 1
  6459. From 2016 Report on International Religious Freedom - Iceland (United States Department of State, 15 August 2017) Executive Summary The constitution provides for freedom of religious belief and practice, as long as it is not prejudicial to good morals or public order, and protects the right to form religious associations. It names the Evangelical Lutheran Church (ELC) as the state church, and the government provides it with financial support and benefits not available to other religious groups. Other religious and "life-stance" groups must register to receive state subsidies. The government approved the application of one life-stance group, DiaMat, but rejected the application of one religious group, the Rastafarians, and one life-stance group, Ananda Marga, citing among other reasons, that the groups were not "well-established." The Supreme Court upheld a ruling that school officials had illegally dismissed a grade school teacher after parents complained about the views he expressed against homosexuality, which he said were based on biblical teachings. An online poll on public attitudes toward the construction of houses of worship showed 42.1 percent of respondents opposed the erection of a mosque, while 28.5 percent opposed building a Russian Orthodox church, 20.6 percent were against building a Buddhist temple, and 12.1 percent against the construction of a pagan temple. The Forum for Interfaith Dialogue and Cooperation continued to sponsor programs to strengthen dialogue between religious groups and life-stance organizations. U.S. embassy officials regularly met with government representatives, who agreed on the importance of respecting religious freedom. Embassy officials also maintained regular contact with representatives of religious groups, including the ELC, the Association of Muslims in Iceland, and the Islamic Foundation of Iceland, to discuss religious freedom. Section II. Status of Government Respect for Religious Freedom Legal Framework The constitution states all individuals have the right to form religious associations and practice religion in accordance with their personal beliefs, as long as nothing is "preached or practiced which is prejudicial to good morals or public order." It stipulates everyone has the right to remain outside religious associations and no one shall be required to pay personal dues to any religious association of which he or she is not a member. The constitution also specifies individuals may not lose their civil or national rights or refuse to perform civic duties on religious grounds. The constitution bans only religious teachings or practices harmful to good morals or the public order. The law further specifies the right of individuals to choose or change their religion. The official state religion is Lutheranism. The constitution establishes the ELC as the national church and grants it state support and protection. The law grants the ELC official legal status, and the government directly funds the Church from the state budget. The ELC also receives indirect funding along with other registered religious and life-stance groups from church taxes. ------------- This is under the Trump administration.
    1
  6460. 1
  6461. 1
  6462. 1
  6463. 1
  6464. 1
  6465. 1
  6466. 1
  6467. 1
  6468. 1
  6469. 1
  6470. 1
  6471. 1
  6472. 1
  6473. 1
  6474. 1
  6475. 1
  6476. 1
  6477. 1
  6478. 1
  6479. 1
  6480. 1
  6481. 1
  6482. 1
  6483. 1
  6484. 1
  6485. 1
  6486. 1
  6487. 1
  6488. 1
  6489. 1
  6490. 1
  6491. 1
  6492. 1
  6493. 1
  6494. 1
  6495. 1
  6496. 1
  6497. 1
  6498. 1
  6499. 1
  6500. 1
  6501. 1
  6502. 1
  6503. 1
  6504. 1
  6505. 1
  6506. 1
  6507. 1
  6508. 1
  6509. 1
  6510. 1
  6511. 1
  6512. 1
  6513. 1
  6514. 1
  6515. 1
  6516. 1
  6517. 1
  6518.  @Czhr43jh6hyx  >But when US organized a coup in Ukraine in 2014 to get to the Russian doorstep Putin: "I don't want NATO on my bnorder!" Putin the next day: "Imma annex this country so I'm directly sharing a border with NATO." ---- Before Euromaidan, Russia successfully used political and economic leverage to dissuade Ukraine from signing the E.U. deal. In the months prior to the Vilnius summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a trade war with Kyiv, blocking nearly all imports from Ukraine and cutting energy supplies to the country. In turn, this reduced Ukrainian exports by 25 percent and shrank the economy by 1.5 percent. Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17, disallows foreign military bases after 2017. CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on 28 June 1996 Article 17 The location of foreign military bases shall not be permitted on the territory of Ukraine. After 2017, Ukraine's constitution is incompatible with foreign military bases hosting either NATO or CSTO. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17. If Yanukovych didn't sign the military base rental extension, Russia would be kicked out of Crimea. Putin's narrative is false when Yanukovych breached the 1996 Ukraine Constitution's Article 17. Victoria Nuland's grandparents on her father's side are Ukrainian. You can't handle the truth when anti-Russian Ukrainian descendants are backed by NATO's military and economic firepower. 1. 1863–1864 January uprising, Russian Empire crushed Polish, Lithuanian, and Ukrainian insurgents uprising. 2. Soviet–Ukrainian War occurred between 1917 to 1921, a war between the Ukrainian People's Republic vs the Bolsheviks i.e. Ukrainian Soviet Republic and Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (modern-day Russian Federation). These "old world" issues existed before the US being a superpower. The US's involvement with Ukraine is by Ukrainian descendants who fled the Soviet–Ukrainian War that occurred in 1917.
    1
  6519. 1
  6520. 1
  6521. 1
  6522. 1
  6523. 1
  6524. 1
  6525. 1
  6526. 1
  6527. 1
  6528. 1
  6529. 1
  6530. 1
  6531. 1
  6532. 1
  6533. 1
  6534. 1
  6535. 1
  6536. 1
  6537. 1
  6538. 1
  6539. 1
  6540. 1
  6541. 1
  6542. 1
  6543. 1
  6544. 1
  6545. 1
  6546. 1
  6547. 1
  6548. 1
  6549. 1
  6550. 1
  6551. 1
  6552. 1
  6553. 1
  6554. 1
  6555. 1
  6556. 1
  6557. 1
  6558. 1
  6559. 1
  6560. 1
  6561. 1
  6562. 1
  6563. 1
  6564. 1
  6565. 1
  6566. 1
  6567. 1
  6568. 1
  6569. 1
  6570. 1
  6571. 1
  6572. 1
  6573. 1
  6574. 1
  6575.  @stevewing6851  >Dr Kopp explains - the appearance of the first L-Band Fighter Radar is an excellent example of focused and intelligent lateral thinking which targets opponents' weaknesses. Dr Kopp doesn't have access to F-35's stealth fiber material. Lockheed Martin Corporation's year 2010 stealth fiber material patent via Applied NanoStructured Solutions LLC (ANS), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation. Patent number: US20100271253 SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In some aspects, embodiments disclosed herein relate to a radar absorbing composite that includes a (CNT)-infused fiber material disposed in at least a portion of a matrix material. The composite is capable of absorbing radar in a frequency range from between about 0.10 Megahertz to about 60 Gigahertz. The CNT-infused fiber material forms a first layer that reduces radar reflectance and a second layer that dissipates the energy of the absorbed radar. Lockheed Martin reveals F-35 Lot 4 to feature nanocomposite structures via flightglobal's lockheed-martin-reveals-f-35-to-feature-nanocomposite-357223 Patent US20100271253 specifically mentions 2 Ghz L-Band problem with older radar absorbing material. LM's year 2010 stealth fiber material patent is effective from 0.1 MHz to 60 Ghz which is included all VHF, L-band, S-Band, X-band, Ku-band P-Band – 30-100 cm (1-0.3 GHz) L-Band – 15-30 cm (2-1 GHz) S-Band – 8-15 cm (4-2 GHz) C-Band – 4-8 cm (8-4 GHz) X-Band – 2.5-4 cm (12-8 GHz) K-Band – Ku: 1.7-2.5 cm (18-12 GHz); Ka-Band: 0.75-1.2 cm (40-27 GHz).
    1
  6576. 1
  6577. 1
  6578.  @carlose6010  Placed under United States command, Brazilian troops (Portuguese: Força Expedicionária Brasileira, FEB) fought primarily in the liberation of Italy from September 1944 to May 1945. On July 2, 1944, the first 5,000 FEB soldiers, the 6th RCT, left Brazil for Europe aboard the USS General Mann, reaching Naples, Italy on July 16. Lacking weapons, equipment, and even an arrangement for barracks, they remained on the docks while waiting to join the U.S. Task Force 45 on the docks. The poor planning and subsequent embarrassment aroused controversy in Brazilian media. In late July, two more transports with Brazilian troops reached Italy, with three more following in September and November 1944, and February 1945. One notable unit deployed was Brazil's Mountain Infantry Battalion. Brazilian soldiers celebrate Brazilian Independence Day in Italy during World War II, September 1944. The FEB dedicated its first weeks in Italy to acquiring the proper equipment to fight on Italian terrain, and to training under American command.] The preparation in Brazil, despite the two years' interval since the declaration of war, had proved almost worthless. Among the veterans of that campaign, there was a consensus that only combat could adequately prepare the soldier, regardless of the quality of training received earlier. In August, the troops moved to Tarquinia, 350 km north of Naples, where Clark's army was based. In November, the FEB joined General Crittenberger's US IV Corps.
    1
  6579. 1
  6580. 1
  6581. 1
  6582. 1
  6583. 1
  6584. 1
  6585. 1
  6586. 1
  6587. 1
  6588. 1
  6589. 1
  6590. 1
  6591. 1
  6592. 1
  6593. 1
  6594. 1
  6595. 1
  6596. 1
  6597. 1
  6598. 1
  6599. 1
  6600. 1
  6601. 1
  6602. 1
  6603. 1
  6604. 1
  6605. 1
  6606. 1
  6607. 1
  6608. 1
  6609. daidesign121 Read http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/countries/china/ When China joined the WTO in 2001 it agreed to reform and liberalise important parts of its economy. While China has made progress, some problems remain: a lack of transparency industrial policies and non-tariff measures that discriminate against foreign companies strong government intervention in the economy, resulting in a dominant position of state-owned firms, unequal access to subsidies and cheap financing poor protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights In 2016 the EU adopted a new strategy on China mapping out the European Union's relationship with China for the next five years. The Strategy promotes reciprocity, a level playing field and fair competition across all areas of co-operation The strategy also includes a trade agenda with a strong focus on improving market access opportunities – including negotiations on a Comprehensive Agreement on Investment. It also deals with overcapacity and calling on China to engage with ambition at multilateral level. -------- Trump's trade reciprocity argument is similar. You're a hypocrite to single out Trump's reciprocal trade arguments when other countries engages in their own "Made In XYZ country" programs https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-steel-china/eu-raises-import-duties-on-chinese-steel-angering-beijing-idUSKBN1780VU EU already raises import duties on Chinese steel in 2017. https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-06/europe-renews-tariffs-chinese-steel-pipes-high-72 European Union Renews Tariffs On Chinese Steel Pipes As High As 72% https://www.ft.com/content/25900f14-1564-11e8-9c33-02f893d608c2 India has increased it's tariff on Chinese products since Feb 2018.
    1
  6610. 1
  6611. 1
  6612. 1
  6613. 1
  6614. 1
  6615. 1
  6616. 1
  6617. 1
  6618. 1
  6619. 1
  6620. 1
  6621. 1
  6622. 1
  6623. 1
  6624. 1
  6625. 1
  6626. 1
  6627. 1
  6628. 1
  6629. 1
  6630. 1
  6631. 1
  6632. 1
  6633. 1
  6634. 1
  6635. 1
  6636. 1
  6637. 1
  6638. 1
  6639. 1
  6640. Keeping the F-35 Ahead of the Bad Guys by John A. Tirpak March 2019 <snip...> Although the F-35 can carry the new Long-Range Anti-Ship Missile, or LRASM, externally, Winter said the principal new anti-ship missiles coming in Block 4 are the JSOW C1 for the Navy and the Norwegian JSM. The program has “not been asked” about whether the stealthy LRASM can fit inside the F-35’s weapon bays, he said, nor has the Navy asked to integrate the SLAM-ER (Standoff Land Attack Missile-Extended Range) version of the Harpoon anti-ship missile. <...> Last October, then-Defense Secretary Jim Mattis directed the Air Force to increase mission capable rates for the F-22, F-16, and F-35 to at least 80 percent. At the time, the F-35 rate was 54 percent overall, but for 3F aircraft recently off the production line, the rate was better than 80 percent. Winter agreed that spare parts are the “long pole in the tent” for getting the F-35 fleet up to the 80 percent standard. “We have initiatives underway to increase spare parts production,” he said, including accelerating the rate at which parts can be repaired by the F-35 depot at Hill AFB, Utah. This will allow industry to concentrate on making more new parts, rather than fixing older ones, he said. The Air Force has until Sept. 30 to achieve the 80 percent mission capable rate, assuming the order stands under Acting Defense Secretary Patrick M. Shanahan or his successor. <...> From airforcemag_com/MagazineArchive/Pages/2019/March%202019/Keeping-the-F-35-Ahead-of-the-Bad-Guys.aspx Replace _ with . for URL. Do not apply USAF's old pre-Block 3F builds for recent F-35 export customers.
    1
  6641. 1
  6642. 1
  6643. 1
  6644. 1
  6645. 1
  6646. 1
  6647. 1
  6648. 1
  6649. 1
  6650. 1
  6651. 1
  6652. 1
  6653. 1
  6654. 1
  6655. 1
  6656. 1
  6657. 1
  6658. 1
  6659.  @christopherbong6639  It's a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions against Chyna. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  6660. 1
  6661. 1
  6662. 1
  6663. 1
  6664. 1
  6665. 1
  6666. 1
  6667. 1
  6668. 1
  6669. 1
  6670. 1
  6671. 1
  6672. 1
  6673. 1
  6674. 1
  6675. 1
  6676. 1
  6677. 1
  6678. 1
  6679. 1
  6680. 1
  6681. 1
  6682. 1
  6683. 1
  6684. 1
  6685. 1
  6686. 1
  6687. 1
  6688. 1
  6689. 1
  6690. 1
  6691. 1
  6692. 1
  6693. 1
  6694. 1
  6695. 1
  6696. 1
  6697. 1
  6698. 1
  6699. 1
  6700. 1
  6701. 1
  6702. 1
  6703. 1
  6704. 1
  6705. 1
  6706. 1
  6707. 1
  6708. 1
  6709. 1
  6710. 1
  6711. 1
  6712. 1
  6713. 1
  6714.  @fuckfannyfiddlefart  Marxists claim Marxist Socialism is the overthrow of the state for communally owned control of the means of production. This is bullshit when implementation involves a state with massive government intervention. For post-WW2 Japan, MacArthur also executed land reform by shifting significant wealthy landlord's lands to the workers with private land title transfers. MacArthur = land reform transfers that included private land title transfers to the workers. From http://www.crosscurrents.hawaii.edu/content.aspx?lang=eng&site=japan&theme=work&subtheme=AGRIC&unit=JWORK098# Land Reform in Postwar Japan As part of the democratization of Japan after World War II, Japanese leaders and Occupation authorities worked together to carry out land reform. It is regarded as one of the most successful of the Occupation-era reforms, and has become the model for land reform in other countries. The purpose of land reform was to reduce the wide gap between absentee landlords who owned agricultural land but did not farm it themselves, and tenant farmers who rented the land in exchange for giving the landlord a high proportion of the crop. The land reform laws were intended to limit the amount of farmland one household could own to about the amount of land that one family could farm themselves, without outside labor. The government forced absentee landlords to sell all their land to the government. Farmers were allowed to own a small amount of farmland that they could rent out to others ( 2.5 acres or one hectare in most parts of Japan, and 10 acres or 4 hectares in Hokkaido), and had to sell any excess to the government. The government then sold this land, usually to the tenant who had been farming it. The result greatly improved the living conditions of farmers. Idealogical basis: A family's land ownership. The West has its own idealogy on land reform with family unit and private ownership as its core idealogy. VS Marxist = land reform transfer to the state, no private land title transfer to the workers.
    1
  6715. 1
  6716. 1
  6717. 1
  6718.  @brucetucker4847  Kublai instituted social classes based on race. https://www.travelchinaguide.com/intro/history/yuan/four-class-system.htm The 'Four Class System' was a legal caste system in the Yuan Dynasty. After the founding of the Yuan regime, Kublai Khan, the first emperor in the Yuan Dynasty, set up this system to consolidate the ruling status of the Mongolian Ethnic Minority, which had a small number with great disparity to the majority Han people. Specifically, the four classes of people by the descending order were Mongolian people, Semu people, Han people (in the northern areas of China) and Southerners (people of the former Northern Song Dynasty (1127 - 1279)). According to the Yuan rulers' mind, the grading sequence was based on the sequencing of Mongolian's conquest of these people. Some historical scholars said that it was a kind of psychological indication that the earlier they submitted to Mongolian people, the higher social status they would be. Unfairly, the 'Four Class System' stipulated that four classes of people received different treatment in political, legal and military affairs. First, the real power was mainly grasped in the hands of the Mongolian people and Semu people while few of the court officials were Han people or any other ethnic minorities from the third and the fourth classes. Second, although all classes of people were allowed to attend the imperial examination, people of the third and fourth classes had to participate in more test subjects and exam questions that for them were more difficult, compared with the first and second class. Third, the fourth class people received unequal legal treatment. On committing the same crime, different punishments were handed down to different classes of people. Fourth, the Mongolian people adopted a tight control towards the Han people and Southerners. These two classes were forbidden to possess any weapon or raise any dogs or eagles. Generally, the 'Four Class System' was a national policy of political oppression and ethnic division. Originally, it was established by Yuan's ruling class to guarantee the dominance of the Mongolian minority but it eventually became the catalyst that sped up the decline of the Yuan regime.
    1
  6719. 1
  6720. 1
  6721. 1
  6722. 1
  6723. 1
  6724. 1
  6725. 1
  6726. 1
  6727. 1
  6728. 1
  6729.  @personaa422  In Australia, we have the following government programs for the poor or below a certain income threshold 1. "Work for the dole" i.e. universal income with community service obligations. Students have universal income from Austudy while 1st nation students have Abstudy which is slightly higher than Austudy. 2. Nanny state-issued debit card that looks like a normal debit card that blocks non-essential items purchases. Nanny state-issued debit cards are issued for cases that a person can't control their non-essential purchases. Australia doesn't believe in US-style food vouchers that can destroy a person's self-esteem i.e. creating extra mental health problems from US-style food vouchers are minimised. Creating extra mental health problems adds an extra burden on the public health system. 3. The single-payer universal health care and subsidised medicines for all Australians. There's an extra income tax penalty above a certain income threshold i.e. they should be on the private health system. Subsidised medicines include patent reform to reduce the public health cost burden. Single-payer lowers overhead cost on the public health system. 4. Free (for government-supported persons) and low-cost technical colleges with a national enforced qualification framework i.e. equality in the education framework. 5. Public housing or rent cost assistance. 6. Promotion of healthy food programs to reduce the public health cost burden. These are life support government program areas and I mostly support the mentioned government programs in moderation. Not every child is blessed with wealthy parents. There are additional welfare programs that I haven't mentioned. 1st nation students Abstudy which has slightly higher benefits than Austudy does not pass the race neutrality test. New Zealand has similar government programs to Australia. I'm not fully aware of UK's and Canada's versions, but there are universal health care agreements across Australia, NZ, and the UK.
    1
  6730. 1
  6731. 1
  6732. 1
  6733. 1
  6734. 1
  6735. 1
  6736. 1
  6737. 1
  6738. 1
  6739. 1
  6740. 1
  6741. 1
  6742. 1
  6743.  @levinoseberg4284  Against your "Churchill certainly didn't win at Yalta". UK delivered the first major defeat on Nazi Germany with the Battle of Britain. UK is mostly a maritime power while Nazi Germany is mostly a land power. With the Battle of Britain, UK's airforce defeated Nazi Germany's airforce. Against your "Britain and her Empire are hardly winning at the moment" argument. Refer to the "Five Eyes" group as it's successor states to the British Empire. CANZUK (AU, CAN, UK, NZ) group has 4th largest GDP after US, China and EU. https://web.archive.org/web/20180827151002/https://www.willistowerswatson.com/-/media/WTW/Images/Press/2018/01/Global-Pension-Asset-Study-2018-Japan.pdf Nanny state forced savings (pension funds) vs GDP ratio Australia: 138.4 percent US: 131.2 percent UK: 121.3 percent Canada: 107.8 percent ... Japan: 62.5 percent Germany: 12.9 percent China: 1.5 percent -------------- Notice "Five Eyes" countries have large nanny state forced savings. Hint: Getting ready for the rainy day. "Five Eyes" countries are policy sync with pension funds. https://www.fxstreet.com/news/german-industry-stuck-in-recession-no-signs-of-bottoming-out-germanys-bdi-202001160936 German industry stuck in recession, no signs of bottoming out – Germany’s BDI Meanwhile in the US https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jan/1/trump-gets-strongest-argument-for-reelection-from-/ US has a booming economy. Against your "HD porn". Are you claiming EU countries don't have porn? Hint: Use Bing video search with EU country (e.g. German, Czech, Swedes, Finns, etc)  of interest and selective porn keywords. You're a hypocrite. Human sexual interaction is natural. Reminder: western countries' birth rates need to increase. Germany's birth rate is lower than the Five Eyes countries.
    1
  6744. 1
  6745. 1
  6746. 1
  6747. 1
  6748. 1
  6749. 1
  6750.  @inurmomsbedroom123  Bengal famine of 1943 Throughout 1942 and early 1943, military and political events combined with natural disasters and plant disease to place widespread stress on Bengal's economy.[71] While Bengal's food needs rose from increased military presence and an influx of refugees from Burma,[72] its ability to obtain rice and other grains was restricted by inter-provincial trade barriers.[73] Japanese invasion of Burma The Japanese campaign for Burma set off an exodus of more than half of the one million Indians from Burma for India.[74] The flow began after the bombing of Rangoon (1941–1942), and for months thereafter desperate people poured across the borders, escaping into India through Bengal and Assam.[75] On 26 April 1942, all Allied forces were ordered to retreat from Burma into India.[76] Military transport and other supplies were dedicated to military use, and unavailable for use by the refugees.[77] By mid May 1942, the monsoon rains became heavy in the Manipur hills, further inhibiting civilian movement.[78] By April 1942, *Japanese warships and aircraft had sunk approximately 100,000 tons of merchant shipping in the Bay of Bengal*. [83] According to General Archibald Wavell, Commander-in-Chief of the army in India, both the War Office in London and the commander of the British Eastern Fleet acknowledged that the fleet was powerless to mount serious opposition to Japanese naval attacks on Ceylon, southern or eastern India, or on shipping in the Bay of Bengal.[83] For decades, rail transport had been integral to successful efforts by the Raj to forestall famine in India.[84] However, Japanese raids put additional strain on railways, which also endured flooding in the Brahmaputra, a malaria epidemic, and the Quit India movement targeting road and rail communication.[85] Throughout, transportation of civil supplies were compromised by the railways' increased military obligations, and the dismantling of tracks carried out in areas of eastern Bengal in 1942 to hamper a potential Japanese invasion.[86] ------ Try again. Again, The Spectator labeled British Labor's John McDonnell'sand Owen Jones' narrative as FAKE NEWS.
    1
  6751.  @aayushraj6171  Provincial trade barriers Many Indian provinces and princely states imposed inter-provincial trade barriers from mid-1942, preventing trade in domestic rice. Anxiety and soaring rice prices, triggered by the fall of Burma,[131] were one underlying reason for the trade barriers. Trade imbalances brought on by price controls were another.[92] The power to restrict inter-provincial trade was given provincial governments in November 1941 under the Defence of India Act, 1939.[M] Provincial governments began erecting trade barriers that prevented the flow of foodgrains (especially rice) and other goods between provinces. These barriers reflected a desire to see that local populations were well fed, thus forestalling local emergencies.[132] In January 1942, Punjab banned exports of wheat;[133][N] this increased the perception of food insecurity and led the enclave of wheat-eaters in Greater Calcutta to increase their demand for rice precisely when an impending rice shortage was feared.[134] The Central Provinces prohibited the export of foodgrains outside the province two months later.[135] Madras banned rice exports in June,[136] followed by export bans in Bengal and its neighbouring provinces of Bihar and Orissa that July.[137] The Famine Inquiry Commission of 1945 characterised this "critical and potentially most dangerous stage" as a key policy failure. As one deponent to the Commission put it: "Every province, every district, every [administrative division] in the east of India had become a food republic unto itself. The trade machinery for the distribution of food [between provinces] throughout the east of India was slowly strangled, and by the spring of 1943 was dead."[138] Bengal was unable to import domestic rice; this policy helped transform market failures and food shortage into famine and widespread death.[139] You shutup fukwit.
    1
  6752. 1
  6753. 1
  6754. 1
  6755. 1
  6756. 1
  6757. 1
  6758. 1
  6759. 1
  6760. 1
  6761. 1
  6762. 1
  6763. 1
  6764. 1
  6765. 1
  6766. 1
  6767. 1
  6768. 1
  6769. 1
  6770. 1
  6771. 1
  6772. 1
  6773. 1
  6774. 1
  6775. 1
  6776. 1
  6777. 1
  6778. 1
  6779. 1
  6780. 1
  6781. 1
  6782. 1
  6783.  Phon Seng  >its media and mainly the western media liek BBC england and CNN american is lying and pushign lies to start wars That's a false narrative that doesn't address the root cause for Ukraine vs Russian conflict. Date: Jan. 7, 2010 Yanukovych: Ukraine will remain a neutral state. "It’s certain that Ukraine was and will be non-aligned state… We strive neither to join NATO nor the [CIS]CSTO [Collective Security Treaty Organization]. We’ll maintain a neutral status," Yanukovych said in an interview with the Komsomolskaya Pravda in Ukraine newspaper. -------- The trigger for Euromaidan was Yanukovych initiated non-neutrality policies such as joining a trade block instead of executing Switzerland-style neutrality. UK leaving the EU and joining CPTPP proves freedom of association. Before Euromaidan, Russia, however, has successfully used political and economic leverage to dissuade Ukraine from signing the E.U. deal. In the months prior to the Vilnius summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a trade war with Kiev, blocking nearly all imports from Ukraine and cutting energy supplies to the country. In turn, this reduced Ukrainian exports by 25 percent and shrank the economy by 1.5 percent. Some trade background for the context From Tradebarrier Index (lower score = less trade barriers) New Zealand's tariff score is 2.92 Australia's tariff score is 3.03 UK's tariff score is 3.94 (after Brexit) Japan's tariff score is 4.05 US's tariff score is 4.54 Germany's tariff score is 4.88 EU's tariff score is 4.88 Russia's tariff score is 6.16 <-------- China's tariff score is 6.8 <------ Russia wants to maintain its higher trade protectionist policies. Ukraine joining the EU's FTA creates a loophole in Russia's higher tariff protectionist policies. Complication, IF Russia blocks trade with Ukraine, it then blocks trade with pro-Russian Donbas and Luhansk. On a related trade topic, the CPTPP zone has very a strong policy on the product's origin and Swizterland is having problems with it. The "Made In" label should be expanded with percentage.
    1
  6784. 1
  6785.  @superbananas7792  >Correction a middle class coup created the USSR.....that crushed an actual workers social revolution. Notice the "so-called" pre-fix. From Cambridge dictionary used to show that you think a word that is used to describe someone or something is not suitable or not correct: Learn proper English. For post-WW2 Japan, MacArthur also executed land reform by shifting significant wealthy landlord's lands to the workers with private land title transfers. Land Reform in Postwar Japan As part of the democratization of Japan after World War II, Japanese leaders and Occupation authorities worked together to carry out land reform. It is regarded as one of the most successful of the Occupation-era reforms, and has become the model for land reform in other countries. The purpose of land reform was to reduce the wide gap between absentee landlords who owned agricultural land but did not farm it themselves, and tenant farmers who rented the land in exchange for giving the landlord a high proportion of the crop. The land reform laws were intended to limit the amount of farm land one household could own to about the amount of land that one family could farm themselves, without outside labor. The government forced absentee landlords to sell all their land to the government. Farmers were allowed to own a small amount of farm land that they could rent out to others ( 2.5 acres or one hectare in most parts of Japan, and 10 acres or 4 hectares in Hokkaido), and had to sell any excess to the government. The government then sold this land, usually to the tenant who had been farming it. The result greatly improved the living conditions of farmers. Idealogical basis: A family's land ownership. The West has its own idealogy on land reform with family unit and private ownership as its core idealogy. VS Marxist = land reform transfer to the state, no private land title transfer to the workers.
    1
  6786. 1
  6787.  @nirad8026  >Afghanistan 1. Osama Bin Laden. >Iraq 2. Iraq invaded Kuwait. Report: Saudi Arabia Presses U.S. on Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Date: January 19, 1992 From AP NEWS NEW YORK (AP) _ Saudi Arabia is pressuring the Bush administration to secretly arm and give intelligence to Iraqi opposition forces so they can work to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a newspaper reported Sunday. The Saudis want the United States to give arms and intelligence to Kurdish rebels in north Iraq, Shiite Muslim fighters in the south and Sunni Muslim opposition forces in central Iraq, the Times said, quoting U.S. and allied officials it didn’t name. ----- Iraq's top oil exports countries from Jan to Jun 2020 1st, China! 29 million tonnes <---- LOL 2nd, India, 23 million tonnes 3rd, EU, 8 million tonnes 4th, South Korea, 6 million tonnes 5th, Turkey, 4 million tonnes with an upwards trend 5th, USA, 4 million tonnes with a downwards trend >Libya 3. "On 10 March 2011, France was the first country in the world to recognise the National Transitional Council as the legitimate government of Libya". >Yugoslavia 4. "*The European move, and follow-up actions elsewhere, are expected to put pressure on the United States to grant recognition*, even though it has been opposed to such a step at this time. The U.S. fears that recognition could endanger the current cease-fire in the war between Serbia and Croatia and cause the war to spread to Bosnia-Herzegovina." 19 December 1991: Germany announces that it will recognize Croatia on January 15, 1992, with or without the rest of the European Community. 23 December 1991: Germany becomes the first major power to recognize Croatia and Slovenia as independent states 15 January 1992: The European Community recognizes Slovenia and Croatia. Without NATO (and U.S.), Germany and Austria would have done it alone and we would have another WW1 i.e. Russia would have taken on Germany as in WWI. Your blame on the US is flawed when it's the European move that pushed for Yugoslavia's break-up. One should see why Russia wants to get rid of NATO.
    1
  6788.  @superbananas7792  >So there is no "Family ideology" that involves State Capitalism. That's red herring. You didn't factor in the implementation details for MacArthur's Land Reform in Postwar Japan. Again, Land Reform in Postwar Japan As part of the democratization of Japan after World War II, Japanese leaders and Occupation authorities worked together to carry out land reform. It is regarded as one of the most successful of the Occupation-era reforms, and has become the model for land reform in other countries. The purpose of land reform was to reduce the wide gap between absentee landlords who owned agricultural land but did not farm it themselves, and tenant farmers who rented the land in exchange for giving the landlord a high proportion of the crop. The land reform laws were intended to limit the amount of farm land one household could own to about the amount of land that one family could farm themselves , without outside labor. The government forced absentee landlords to sell all their land to the government. Farmers were allowed to own a small amount of farm land that they could rent out to others ( 2.5 acres or one hectare in most parts of Japan, and 10 acres or 4 hectares in Hokkaido), and had to sell any excess to the government. The government then sold this land, usually to the tenant who had been farming it. The result greatly improved the living conditions of farmers. Idealogical basis: A family's land ownership. MacArthur's Land Reform in Postwar Japan is with family unit and private ownership as its core idealogy. Your narrative is bullshit.
    1
  6789. 1
  6790. 1
  6791.  @serheyyavotsky1246  The Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical.
    1
  6792. 1
  6793. 1
  6794. 1
  6795. 1
  6796. 1
  6797. 1
  6798. 1
  6799. 1
  6800. 1
  6801. 1
  6802. 1
  6803. 1
  6804. 1
  6805.  @DanielSMatthews  Australia (26.1 million population, 2022) should be compared to South Korea (51.6 million population, 2022) SK = $1.811 trillion USD (2021) AU = $1.553 trillion USD (2021) The South Koreans are giving Elon Musk a headache. Why is Australia's GDP so high? Australia's US$7.3 trillion financial sector includes the world's fifth-largest pool of pension assets. From GPAS__2021 pdf Pension (mandated nanny state saving funds) vs GDP ratio for 2021 Five Eyes/Five Passport Group, Australia, $2,333 billion, 174.8% (CPTPP member, Nordic model), Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (USMCA, CPTPP member, Nordic model) United Kingdom, $3,564 billion, 135.1% (CPTPP member in July 2023, Nordic model) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (USMCA member) (I don't have data for NZ) Notice the Five Eyes group has similar pension assets to GDP ratio results Large-scale mandated savings funds enable the government to issue government bonds and large-scale bond buyer markets! EU Finland, $279 billion, 104.3% (Nordic model) France, $166 billion, 6.5% Germany, $548 billion, 14.5% Italy, $231 billion, 12.5% <----- PIIGS Netherlands, $1,900 billion, 214.4%, (Nordic model) Ireland, $197 billion, 49.4% <----- PIIGS Spain, $44 billion, 3.6% <----- PIIGS The EU lacks strategic savings coordination. Non-EU, Europe Switzerland, $1,163 billion, 164.3% (Nordic model) North America Mexico, $259 billion, 24.9% (USMCA, CPTPP member,) Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (USMCA, CPTPP member, Nordic model) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (USMCA member) South America Brazil, $195 billion,14.3% Chile, $243 billion, 99.2% (CPTPP member) East Asia, South East Asia China, $285 billion, 1.9% Hong Kong, $199 billion, 58.3% Japan, $3,613 billion, 73.6% (CPTPP member) South Korea, $968 billion, 61.0% Malaysia, $279 billion, 83.0% (CPTPP member) South-Central Asia India, $184 billion, 7.1%
    1
  6806. 1
  6807. 1
  6808. 1
  6809. 1
  6810. 1
  6811. 1
  6812. 1
  6813. 1
  6814. 1
  6815. 1
  6816. 1
  6817. 1
  6818. 1
  6819. 1
  6820. 1
  6821. 1
  6822. 1
  6823. 1
  6824. 1
  6825. 1
  6826. 1
  6827. 1
  6828. 1
  6829. 1
  6830. 1
  6831. 1
  6832. 1
  6833. 1
  6834. 1
  6835.  @guhad0108  http://www.businessinsider.com/bnd-report-on-saudi-arabias-power-struggle-2015-12 Germany's intelligence agency says Saudi Arabia's 'game of thrones' risks tearing the Middle East apart. From https://www.reuters.com/article/us-opec-meeting-shale/inside-opec-room-naimi-declares-price-war-on-u-s-shale-oil-idUSKCN0JC1GK20141128 Saudi Arabia declares war on US shale oil. What do we have here? Another attempt to make the US to be Saudi Arabia's armed proxy? http://www.businessinsider.com/turkey-and-saudi-arabia-collaborating-in-syria-2015-5?IR=T Sunni dominated Turkey and Saudi Arabia are officially collaborating to bring down Assad in Syria https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2014/12/12/why-turkeys-president-wants-to-revive-the-language-of-the-ottoman-empire/ Turkey wants to revive the Ottoman Empire , hence they have their goals and objectives. https://www.rt.com/op-edge/270280-wahhabism-terrorism-isis-islam/ Wahhabism: Religious deviance and fountainhead of radicalism & extremism. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-19/maajid-nawaz-on-being-drawn-into-the-world-of-islamist-extremism/7180614 From 'exporting extremism' to challenging those trying to impose Islam on others. When rival German/American/Australian western media vs Russian media has similar conclusions that a certain Middle East country or countries playing 'game of thrones', then there's a problem. China, Russia, and the West are happily selling weapons to these Islamic regimes. "Old world" issues did NOT disappear i.e. "there's nothing new under the sun".
    1
  6836. 1
  6837. 1
  6838. 1
  6839. 1
  6840. 1
  6841. 1
  6842. 1
  6843. 1
  6844. 1
  6845. 1
  6846. 1
  6847. 1
  6848. 1
  6849. 1
  6850. 1
  6851. 1
  6852. 1
  6853. 1
  6854.  @NoumenonAndPhenomenon  Biolabs are rated into biosafety level (BSL), or pathogen/protection level. Biosafety level 1 Biosafety level 1 (BSL-1) is suitable for work with well-characterized agents which do not cause disease in healthy humans. In general, these agents should pose minimal potential hazard to laboratory personnel and the environment.[11] At this level, precautions are limited relative to other levels. Laboratory personnel must wash their hands upon entering and exiting the lab. Research with these agents may be performed on standard open laboratory benches without the use of special containment equipment. However, eating and drinking are generally prohibited in laboratory areas.[11] Potentially infectious material must be decontaminated before disposal, either by adding a chemical such as bleach or isopropanol or by packaging for decontamination elsewhere.[11] Personal protective equipment is only required for circumstances where personnel might be exposed to hazardous material.[11] BSL-1 laboratories must have a door which can be locked to limit access to the lab. However, it is not necessary for BSL-1 labs to be isolated from the general building.[12] This level of biosafety is appropriate for work with several kinds of microorganisms including non-pathogenic strains of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus, Bacillus subtilis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and other organisms not suspected to contribute to human disease.[13] Due to the relative ease and safety of maintaining a BSL-1 laboratory, these are the types of laboratories generally used as teaching spaces for high schools and colleges.[12] Biosafety level 2 At this level, all precautions used at Biosafety Level 1 are followed, and some additional precautions are taken. BSL-2 differs from BSL-1 in that: Laboratory personnel have specific training in handling pathogenic agents and are directed by scientists with advanced training. Access to the laboratory is limited when work is being conducted. Extreme precautions are taken with contaminated sharp items. Certain procedures in which infectious aerosols or splashes may be created are conducted in biological safety cabinets or other physical containment equipment.[11] Biosafety level 2 is suitable for work involving agents of moderate potential hazard to personnel and the environment.[12] This includes various microbes that cause mild disease to humans, or are difficult to contract via aerosol in a lab setting.[14] Examples include hepatitis A, B, and C viruses, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), pathogenic strains of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus, Salmonella, Plasmodium falciparum, and Toxoplasma gondii.[14][15] Prions, the infectious agents that transmit prion diseases such as vCJD, may be handled under Biosafety Level 2 or higher.[16] Biosafety level 3 Researcher at US Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia, working with influenza virus under biosafety level 3 conditions, with respirator inside a biosafety cabinet (BSC). Biosafety level 3 is appropriate for work involving microbes which can cause serious and potentially lethal disease via the inhalation route.[11] This type of work can be done in clinical, diagnostic, teaching, research, or production facilities.[12] Here, the precautions undertaken in BSL-1 and BSL-2 labs are followed, as well as additional measures including: All laboratory personnel are provided medical surveillance and offered relevant immunizations (where available) to reduce the risk of an accidental or unnoticed infection.[11] All procedures involving infectious material must be done within a biological safety cabinet.[11] Laboratory personnel must wear solid-front protective clothing (i.e. gowns that tie in the back). This cannot be worn outside of the laboratory and must be discarded or decontaminated after each use.[11] A laboratory-specific biosafety manual must be drafted which details how the laboratory will operate in compliance with all safety requirements.[11] In addition, the facility which houses the BSL-3 laboratory must have certain features to ensure appropriate containment. The entrance to the laboratory must be separated from areas of the building with unrestricted traffic flow.[11] Additionally, the laboratory must be behind two sets of self-closing doors (to reduce the risk of aerosols escaping).[12] The construction of the laboratory is such that it can be easily cleaned. Carpets are not permitted, and any seams in the floors, walls, and ceilings are sealed to allow for easy cleaning and decontamination.[11] Additionally, windows must be sealed, and a ventilation system installed which forces air to flow from the "clean" areas of the lab to the areas where infectious agents are handled.[11] Air from the laboratory must be filtered before it can be recirculated.[11] A 2015 study by USA Today journalists identified more than 200 lab sites in the U.S. that were accredited biosafety levels 3 or 4.[17] The Proceedings of a Workshop on "Developing Norms for the Provision of Biological Laboratories in Low-Resource Contexts" provides a list of BSL-3 laboratories in those countries.[18] Biosafety level 3 is commonly used for research and diagnostic work involving various microbes which can be transmitted by aerosols and/or cause severe disease. These include Francisella tularensis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Chlamydia psittaci, Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus, Eastern equine encephalitis virus, SARS-CoV-1, MERS-CoV, Coxiella burnetii, Rift Valley fever virus, Rickettsia rickettsii, several species of Brucella, chikungunya, yellow fever virus, West Nile virus, Yersinia pestis,[15] and SARS-CoV-2.[19] Biosafety level 4 See also: List of biosafety level 4 organisms CDC technician dons an older-model positive-pressure suit before entering one of the CDC's earlier BSL-4 labs. Biosafety level 4 (BSL-4) is the highest level of biosafety precautions, and is appropriate for work with agents that could easily be aerosol-transmitted within the laboratory and cause severe to fatal disease in humans for which there are no available vaccines or treatments. BSL-4 laboratories are generally set up to be either cabinet laboratories or protective-suit laboratories. In cabinet laboratories, all work must be done within a class III biosafety cabinet. Materials leaving the cabinet must be decontaminated by passing through an autoclave or a tank of disinfectant. The cabinets themselves are required to have seamless edges to allow for easy cleaning. Additionally the cabinet and all materials within must be free of sharp edges in order to reduce the risk of damage to the gloves. In a protective-suit laboratory, all work must be done in a class II biosafety cabinet by personnel wearing a positive pressure suit. In order to exit the BSL-4 laboratory, personnel must pass through a chemical shower for decontamination, then a room for removing the positive-pressure suit, followed by a personal shower. Entry into the BSL-4 laboratory is restricted to trained and authorized individuals, and all persons entering and exiting the laboratory must be recorded.[11] As with BSL-3 laboratories, BSL-4 laboratories must be separated from areas that receive unrestricted traffic. Additionally airflow is tightly controlled to ensure that air always flows from "clean" areas of the lab to areas where work with infectious agents is being performed. The entrance to the BSL-4 lab must also employ airlocks to minimize the possibility that aerosols from the lab could be removed from the lab. All laboratory waste, including filtered air, water, and trash must also be decontaminated before it can leave the facility.[11] Biosafety level 4 laboratories are used for diagnostic work and research on easily transmitted pathogens which can cause fatal disease. These include a number of viruses known to cause viral hemorrhagic fever such as Marburg virus, Ebola virus, Lassa virus, and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever. Other pathogens handled at BSL-4 include Hendra virus, Nipah virus, and some flaviviruses. Additionally, poorly characterized pathogens which appear closely related to dangerous pathogens are often handled at this level until sufficient data are obtained either to confirm continued work at this level, or to permit working with them at a lower level.[15] This level is also used for work with Variola virus, the causative agent of smallpox, though this work is only performed at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, United States, and the State Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology in Koltsovo, Russia.[20]
    1
  6855. 1
  6856. 1
  6857. 1
  6858. 1
  6859. 1
  6860. 1
  6861. 1
  6862. 1
  6863. 1
  6864. 1
  6865. 1
  6866. 1
  6867. 1
  6868. 1
  6869. 1
  6870. 1
  6871. 1
  6872. 1
  6873. 1
  6874. 1
  6875. 1
  6876. 1
  6877. 1
  6878. 1
  6879. 1
  6880.  @StevenSmith-mk5fg  >the Russians are still saying they have no plans to invade Russia already invaded Ukraine by slicing out Crimea and integrating Crimea into Russian Federation's federal structure. >and wish to talk Putin's talk is a list of demands Putin: “Speaking of security guarantees … our actions will not depend upon the negotiations, they will depend on the unconditional compliance with Russian security demands”. The main articles of Russian draft proposed agreement demand included eight articles with the following points: Article 1: the parties should not strengthen their security at the expense of Russia’s security; Article 2: the parties will use multilateral consultations and the NATO-Russia Council to address points of conflict; Article 3: the parties reaffirm that they do not consider each other as adversaries and maintain a dialogue; Article 4: the parties shall not deploy military forces and weaponry on the territory of any of the other states in Europe in addition to any forces that were deployed as of May 27, 1997; Article 5: the parties shall not deploy land-based intermediate- and short-range missiles adjacent to the other parties; Article 6: all member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization commit themselves to refrain from any further enlargement of NATO, including the accession of Ukraine as well as other States; Article 7: the parties that are member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization shall not conduct any military activity on the territory of Ukraine as well as other States in the Eastern Europe, in the South Caucasus and in Central Asia; and Article 8: the agreement shall not be interpreted as affecting the primary responsibility of the Security Council of the United Nations for maintaining international peace and security. ---------------- For Article 1, Israel sells missile technology to Eastern Europe while Russia sells missile technology to Israel's adversaries. For Article 3, Being labeled adversaries are based on action and behaviors. Finland, Poland, and the Baltic states have purchased Israeli missile technology and have historical PTSD issues with Imperialist Russia. There are no US nuclear-armed missiles in Eastern Europe. For Article 4, Russia's demand to degrade NATO's Article V enforcement. For Article 5, Israel sells missile technology to Eastern Europe while Russia sells missile technology to Israel's adversaries. There are no US nuclear-armed missiles in Eastern Europe. Finland is not a NATO member. For Article 6, Russia demands to restrict counties in Eastern Europe's freedom of association. For Article 7, Russia's demand to degrade NATO's Article V enforcement for NATO members in Eastern Europe. For Article 8, Putin's bullshit statement.
    1
  6881. 1
  6882. 1
  6883. 1
  6884. 1
  6885. 1
  6886. 1
  6887. 1
  6888. 1
  6889. 1
  6890. 1
  6891. 1
  6892. 1
  6893. 1
  6894. 1
  6895. 1
  6896. 1
  6897. 1
  6898. 1
  6899. 1
  6900. 1
  6901. 1
  6902. 1
  6903. 1
  6904. 1
  6905. 1
  6906. 1
  6907. 1
  6908. 1
  6909. 1
  6910. 1
  6911. 1
  6912. 1
  6913. 1
  6914. 1
  6915. 1
  6916. 1
  6917. 1
  6918. 1
  6919. 1
  6920. 1
  6921. 1
  6922. 1
  6923. 1
  6924. 1
  6925. 1
  6926. 1
  6927. 1
  6928. 1
  6929. 1
  6930. 1
  6931. 1
  6932. 1
  6933. 1
  6934. 1
  6935. 1
  6936. 1
  6937. The main reason why the Hamas paragliders avoided getting shot down is that Israel likely couldn’t detect them, said retired Marine Col. J.D. Williams, a defense policy researcher with the RAND Corporation. “The paragliders would probably have flown very low — popping up to go over the border fencing and then flying low to the ground — staying under the radar coverage of Israeli air and missile defenses,” Williams told Task & Purpose on Thursday. “In addition, those air and missile defenses, primarily the Iron Dome system, are optimized to detect fast-moving, high trajectory weapons — missiles and rockets — and are not tuned to pick up low-flying, slow-moving objects like paragliders.” Although counter-drone systems could engage paragliders, it is unclear how widely Israel deployed such systems before the Oct. 7 attacks or if they were positioned to stop incursions from Gaza, Williams said. Even if counter-drone systems were in the area where Hamas launched its paraglider attacks, they still would have had the same challenges in detecting low-flying paragliders as other air and missile systems, he said. --- The U.S. military has had its own difficulties detecting slow-moving aerial objects and distinguishing threats from harmless balloons. Following the Feb. 4 shoot-down of a Chinese spy balloon off the coast of South Carolina, the head of U.S. Northern Command and North American Aerospace Defense Command acknowledged that U.S. air defense systems had missed previous spy balloons that had flown over the country. “It’s my responsibility to detect threats to North America,” Air Force Gen. Glen VanHerck said at a Feb. 6 Pentagon news conference. “I will tell you that we did not detect those threats. And that’s a domain awareness gap that we have to figure out. But I don’t want to go in further detail.” After the U.S. military recalibrated its radar and other sensors to look for small objects at high altitudes traveling at slow speeds, Air Force fighters shot down three unidentified aerial objects on Feb. 10, 11, and 12 over U.S. and Canadian airspace. President Joe Biden later said the objects were likely balloons being used for scientific research or owned by private companies and hobbyists.
    1
  6938. 1
  6939. 1
  6940. 1
  6941. 1
  6942. 1
  6943. 1
  6944. 1
  6945. 1
  6946. 1
  6947. 1
  6948. 1
  6949. 1
  6950. 1
  6951. 1
  6952. 1
  6953. 1
  6954. 1
  6955. 1
  6956. 1
  6957. 1
  6958. 1
  6959. 1
  6960. 1
  6961. 1
  6962. 1
  6963. 1
  6964. 1
  6965. 1
  6966. 1
  6967. 1
  6968. 1
  6969. 1
  6970. 1
  6971. 1
  6972. 1
  6973. 1
  6974. 1
  6975. 1
  6976. 1
  6977. 1
  6978. 1
  6979. 1
  6980. 1
  6981. 1
  6982. 1
  6983. 1
  6984. 1
  6985. 1
  6986. 1
  6987. 1
  6988. 1
  6989. 1
  6990. 1
  6991. 1
  6992. 1
  6993. 1
  6994. 1
  6995. 1
  6996. 1
  6997. 1
  6998. 1
  6999. 1
  7000. 1
  7001. 1
  7002. 1
  7003. 1
  7004. 1
  7005. 1
  7006. 1
  7007. 1
  7008. 1
  7009.  @JanBruunAndersen  False. Countries like Japan, Australia, Singapore, South Korea, New Zealand and Canada are also highly successful economies. From GPAS__2021 pdf Pension (mandated nanny state saving funds) vs GDP ratio for 2021 Five Eyes/Five Passport Group, Australia, $2,333 billion, 174.8% (CPTPP member, Nordic model), Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (USMCA, CPTPP member, Nordic model) United Kingdom, $3,564 billion, 135.1% (CPTPP member in July 2023, Nordic model) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (USMCA member) (I don't have data for NZ) Notice the Five Eyes group has similar pension assets to GDP ratio results Large-scale mandated savings funds enable the government to issue government bonds and large-scale bond buyer markets! This is why Eurocrats wants UK back into the EU. EU Finland, $279 billion, 104.3% (Nordic model) France, $166 billion, 6.5% Germany, $548 billion, 14.5% Italy, $231 billion, 12.5% <----- PIIGS Netherlands, $1,900 billion, 214.4%, (Nordic model) Ireland, $197 billion, 49.4% <----- PIIGS Spain, $44 billion, 3.6% <----- PIIGS The EU lacks strategic savings coordination. Non-EU, Europe Switzerland, $1,163 billion, 164.3% (Nordic model) North America Mexico, $259 billion, 24.9% (USMCA, CPTPP member,) Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (USMCA, CPTPP member, Nordic model) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (USMCA member) South America Brazil, $195 billion,14.3% Chile, $243 billion, 99.2% (CPTPP member) East Asia, South East Asia China, $285 billion, 1.9% Hong Kong, $199 billion, 58.3% Japan, $3,613 billion, 73.6% (CPTPP member) South Korea, $968 billion, 61.0% Malaysia, $279 billion, 83.0% (CPTPP member) South-Central Asia India, $184 billion, 7.1%
    1
  7010. 1
  7011. 1
  7012. 1
  7013. 1
  7014. 1
  7015. 1
  7016. 1
  7017. 1
  7018. 1
  7019. 1
  7020. 1
  7021. 1
  7022. 1
  7023. 1
  7024. 1
  7025. 1
  7026. 1
  7027. 1
  7028. 1
  7029. 1
  7030. 1
  7031. The Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". --------------- In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical. USSR's proxy attempted to remove Chile's check-and-balance Congress system. USSR's proxy attempted to concentrate political power into a single entity (individual and political party). The US has no problems with the Swedish-style nanny market led-socialism that is practiced in the CANZUK and Nordic groups.
    1
  7032. 1
  7033. 1
  7034. 1
  7035. 1
  7036. 1
  7037. 1
  7038. 1
  7039. 1
  7040. 1
  7041.  @solaroid4442  How is Japan able to function with a debt to GDP ratio of 250%? Because sovereign debt is not debt as you and I know debt. It is debt in name only. Liabilities in the accounting sense only, not a future obligation. The government doesn’t go to Citibank for loans; the government bails out Citibank when Citibank gets into trouble. If you are a government with its own currency, why would you need to borrow that currency from anybody? It is a ridiculous proposition on its face. Yet people cannot seem to get past the word “debt,” and most don’t bother to understand how this gigantic “debt” came into being. Here is how it works in the U.S. (all fiat currency economies operate in much the same manner): Treasury issues bonds and sells them to the private sector; then the government spends the proceeds right back into the economy. The private sector gains financial assets (bonds); the government records more liabilities (bonds, reserves, and cash are all government liabilities). The Fed (our central bank) buys bonds in exchange for reserves it creates on the spot in the normal course of business, as they see fit. So the government is able to alter the makeup of their liabilities in the private sector, as all of those liabilities are interchangeable. Treasury obligations held by the central bank as assets against bank liabilities are often counted as part of the “national debt,” but they shouldn’t be. In any sane description, the central bank is part of the government; it is like your left pocket owing your right pocket money. Notice that in none of the above transactions does the government really borrow any private sector assets. Deficit spending results in a net addition of financial assets (money) to the private sector. Dollars aren’t used, taxed away, tied up, or otherwise made unavailable to the private sector; in fact, the private sector has gained money, income, and aggregate demand in the deal. So sovereign debt is nothing like your mortgage debt. It does not make it more difficult for the government to create and spend money in the future; interest payments are simply paid for with new money; and most importantly, it costs the government nothing in real resources to create and spend assets into the private sector while holding the liabilities indefinitely. And these government liabilities (bonds, reserves, and cash) are held by the private sector as debt-free assets. To answer your question, Japan isn’t burdened by interest payments, because the government creates money at no cost. And they aren’t burdened by “paying off the principle” because all government liabilities are interchangeable - the central bank can exchange bonds for yen (or vice versa) with a few keystrokes; no pre-existing money has to be amassed. It is just accounting. ------- Russian currency doesn't have the luxury of large market's US Dollar or EU's Euros, countries like Australia with similar GDP to Russia's GDP must carefully track their government spending.
    1
  7042. 1
  7043. 1
  7044. 1
  7045. 1
  7046. 1
  7047. 1
  7048. 1
  7049. 1
  7050. 1
  7051. 1
  7052. 1
  7053. 1
  7054. 1
  7055. 1
  7056. 1
  7057. 1
  7058. 1
  7059. 1
  7060. 1
  7061. 1
  7062. 1
  7063. 1
  7064. 1
  7065. 1
  7066. 1
  7067.  @paultsjan6047  >And what has Russia and China got to do with Australia?!?! Both China and Russia have ganged up on Australia's and New Zealand's Antarctica marine park plan which caused Australia to enlist help from the EU and New Zealand to enlist US help. >. So who is thinking of attacking whom with B-21 Raider from the US??? Your argument is hypocritical to accept China's superior military hardware while denying it to Australia. Australia has the sovereign to right purchase military hardware. Feelings are useless without firepower to back them. Furthermore, Australia needs to replace the long-range F-111C fighter-bomber fleet. >And what is so bad about communism or socialism?!?! That's a red herring and outside scope of the this video topic. >The US has been renouncing other political system like Socialism . False narrative. The US accepts Nordic's capitalist-socialist hybrid model. For post-WW2 Japan, Douglas Macarthur also executed land reform by shifting significant wealthy landlords' lands to the workers with private land title transfers. Land Reform in Postwar Japan As part of the democratization of Japan after World War II, Japanese leaders and Occupation authorities worked together to carry out land reform. It is regarded as one of the most successful of the Occupation-era reforms, and has become the model for land reform in other countries. The purpose of land reform was to reduce the wide gap between absentee landlords who owned agricultural land but did not farm it themselves, and tenant farmers who rented the land in exchange for giving the landlord a high proportion of the crop. The land reform laws were intended to limit the amount of farm land one household could own to about the amount of land that one family could farm themselves, without outside labor. The government forced absentee landlords to sell all their land to the government. Farmers were allowed to own a small amount of farm land that they could rent out to others ( 2.5 acres or one hectare in most parts of Japan, and 10 acres or 4 hectares in Hokkaido), and had to sell any excess to the government. The government then sold this land, usually to the tenant who had been farming it. The result greatly improved the living conditions of farmers. Idealogical basis: The West has its own idealogy on land reform based on the family unit and private ownership as its core idealogy. This is Macarthur's socialism with private land title transfers. VS Marxist = land reform transfer to the state, no private land title transfer to the workers. Marxist socialism is fake since it doesn't transfer ownership to families.
    1
  7068. 1
  7069. 1
  7070.  @paultsjan6047  The US internal issues are US matters to solve, but China's "old world" issues have affected multiple countries' territorial integrity. These old-world issues existed before the US being a superpower. > Australia has a chequered past of human rights abuses and what the white Australians has done to the First Australians. That's a useless argument when the Australian population has voted First Australians into political offices. Furthermore, there's an ancient virus lurking in remote Australia that affects thousands of Aboriginal adults and this ancient virus is related to HIV( i.e. HTLV-1) and reduces an adult's life span. It's a racist argument to separate Australians by their racial group i.e. your argument is a racial segregation argument, hence you should look in the mirror since your own racial segregation argument failed the race neutrality test. >China do not colonized any countries in the world FALSE. China land grabs and plays for keeps in the current human generation! CPC thinks communism cleanly slates its colonial past, but different languages in China are echoes of different ethnic groups and kingdoms. For the current human generation, China has territorial disputes with other countries e.g. India, Japan, Vietnam, and the Philippines. Disputes in the South China Sea region The nine-dash line area claimed by the Republic of China (1912–1949), later the People's Republic of China (PRC), which covers most of the South China Sea and overlaps with the exclusive economic zone claims of Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan, and Vietnam. Maritime boundary along the Vietnamese coast between the PRC, Taiwan, and Vietnam. Maritime boundary north of Borneo between the PRC, Malaysia, Brunei, Philippines, and Taiwan. Islands, reefs, banks and shoals in the South China Sea, including the Paracel Islands, Pratas Island and the Vereker Banks, Macclesfield Bank, Scarborough Shoal and the Spratly Islands between the PRC, Taiwan, and Vietnam, and parts of the area also contested by Malaysia and the Philippines. Maritime boundary in the waters north of the Natuna Islands between the PRC, Indonesia, Taiwan[20] and Vietnam.[21] Maritime boundary off the coast of Palawan and Luzon between the PRC, the Philippines, and Taiwan. Maritime boundary, land territory, and the islands of Sabah, including Ambalat, between Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines. Maritime boundary and islands in the Luzon Strait between the PRC, the Philippines, and Taiwan.
    1
  7071. 1
  7072. 1
  7073. 1
  7074. 1
  7075. 1
  7076. 1
  7077. 1
  7078. 1
  7079. 1
  7080. 1
  7081. 1
  7082. 1
  7083. 1
  7084. 1
  7085. 1
  7086. Elthenar https://theaviationist.com/2017/02/28/red-flag-confirmed-f-35-dominance-with-a-201-kill-ratio-u-s-air-force-says/ At Red Flag 17-1 the F-35A also included additional roles previously reserved for air superiority aircraft like the F-15C Eagle and heavy strike capability from large bombers while even performing “light AWACS” duties. F-35A Block 3I taking over F-15C's air superiority role in Red Flag 2017. https://web.archive.org/web/20170804135017/http://www.sukhoi.org/eng/planes/military/su30mk/lth/ SU-30MK empty weight estimate from OEM 24900 Kg - (2 x 105 Kg + 2 x 253 Kg + 5270 kg) = 18914 kg or 41698 lbs Select a desired combat range and load SU-30MK with fuel load and calculate the effective wing loading. Basic wing loading empty weight without factoring forward/rear body and vortex lift factors. Fuel and weapons load can change with different missions. F-16C Block 50 Empty Weight: 18,900 lbs Wing area: 300 ft² Wing loading: 63 lbs/ sq feet. Thrust weight ratio: 1.51 : 1 F-18E Empty Weight: 31,500 lbs Wing area: 500 ft² Wing loading: 63 lbs/ sq feet. (minimium turn radius dogfighter) Thrust weight ratio: 1.40 : 1 SU-30MK Empty Weight: 41,698 lbs Wing area: 667 ft² Wing loading: 62.51 lbs/ sq feet. Thrust weight ratio: 1.33 : 1 F-35A Empty weight: 28,999 lbs (Year 2015). Wing area: 460 ft² Wing loading: 63.04 lbs/ sq feet. Thrust weight ratio: 1.48 : 1 SU-35 http://www.flightjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/SUKHOI.pdf Empty Weight: 40,565 lbs (no reference) Wing area: 667 ft² Wing loading: 60.82 lbs/ sq feet. Thrust weight ratio: 1.42 : 1 (29000 lbf for each engine) F-15C Empty Weight: 28,000 lbs Wing area: 608 ft² Wing loading: 46 lbs/ sq feet. Thrust weight ratio: 1.70 : 1 (high energy dogfighter) F-35A with Option Block 1 engine upgrade Empty weight: 28,999 lb (Year 2015). Wing area: 460 ft² Wing loading: 63.04 lbs/ sq feet. Thrust weight ratio: 1.57 : 1 ( 6 percent thrust upgrade) Thrust weight ratio: 1.63 : 1 (10 percent thrust upgrade) After engine upgrade, F-35A restores it's high energy dogfight capabilities.
    1
  7087. DaniëlWW2 https://web.archive.org/web/20170804135017/http://www.sukhoi.org/eng/planes/military/su30mk/lth/ SU-30MK empty weight estimate from OEM 24900 Kg - (2 x 105 Kg + 2 x 253 Kg + 5270 kg) = 18914 kg or 41698 lbs Select a desired combat range and load SU-30MK with fuel load and calculate the effective wing loading. Basic wing loading empty weight without factoring forward/rear body and vortex lift factors. Fuel and weapons load can change with different missions. F-16C Block 50 Empty Weight: 18,900 lbs Wing area: 300 ft² Wing loading: 63 lbs/ sq feet. Thrust weight ratio: 1.51 : 1 F-18E Empty Weight: 31,500 lbs Wing area: 500 ft² Wing loading: 63 lbs/ sq feet. (minimium turn radius dogfighter) Thrust weight ratio: 1.40 : 1 SU-30MK Empty Weight: 41,698 lbs Wing area: 667 ft² Wing loading: 62.51 lbs/ sq feet. <----- Flankers not high energy dogfighter. Thrust weight ratio: 1.33 : 1 <----- Flankers not high energy dogfighter. Thrust vectoring improves rear stabiliser's functions F-35A Empty weight: 28,999 lbs (Year 2015). Wing area: 460 ft² Wing loading: 63.04 lbs/ sq feet. Thrust weight ratio: 1.48 : 1 SU-35 http://www.flightjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/SUKHOI.pdf Empty Weight: 40,565 lbs (no reference) Wing area: 667 ft² Wing loading: 60.82 lbs/ sq feet. Thrust weight ratio: 1.42 : 1 (29000 lbf each engine) F-15C Empty Weight: 28,000 lbs Wing area: 608 ft² Wing loading: 46 lbs/ sq feet. (low wing loading dog-fighter) Thrust weight ratio: 1.70 : 1 (high energy dog-fighter) F-35A with Option Block 1 engine upgrade Empty weight: 28,999 lb (Year 2015). Wing area: 460 ft² Wing loading: 63.04 lbs/ sq feet. Thrust weight ratio: 1.57 : 1 ( 6 percent thrust upgrade) Thrust weight ratio: 1.63 : 1 (10 percent thrust upgrade) Note why Australia applied F-35A being Super Hornet with extra power.
    1
  7088. 1
  7089. 1
  7090. 1
  7091. 1
  7092. 1
  7093. 1
  7094.  @rossevans1774  Note that the US ordered Japan's highly enriched fissile material to be transferred to the US. JP's ability to generate 2 tons of highly enriched fissile material within a year has closed the gap between non-nuclear status and nuclear-state status to a few months. For a total war situation, NPT (Non-Proliferation Treaty) is rendered void i.e. Article X exit clause from NPT. During a total war situation, an advanced country without nuclear weapons and without highly enriched fissile material, it would take at least 2 years to develop a nuclear bomb. Keep in mind, UK and US marine micro-nuclear reactors are designed with highly enriched fissile material. Australia's direction with the AUKUS project is to close the gap between non-nuclear status and nuclear-state status. Budapest Memorandum's impeding failure will add extra arguments for independent nuclear weapons for smaller countries. The US has made agreements with countries such as SK, JP, AUS, and TW to halt independent nuclear weapons programs in exchange for security assurances. The US and UK signed Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum that traded Ukraine's nuclear weapons for security assurances. Russia has exited Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum. France and China have signed a watered-down Budapest Memorandum. US EXIT (due to Republican isolationism) from Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum has a negative outcome for any US allies being in the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). Like Ukraine''s Budapest Memorandum, Australia does NOT have a NATO Article V quality defense treaty with the US. Feelings are useless without firepower to back them.
    1
  7095. 1
  7096. 1
  7097. 1
  7098. 1
  7099. 1
  7100. 1
  7101. 1
  7102. 1
  7103. 1
  7104. 1
  7105. 1
  7106. 1
  7107. 1
  7108. 1
  7109. 1
  7110. 1
  7111. China has an anti-foreigner "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" protectionist policy. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  7112. 1
  7113. 1
  7114. 1
  7115. 1
  7116. 1
  7117. 1
  7118. 1
  7119. 1
  7120. 1
  7121. 1
  7122. 1
  7123. 1
  7124. 1
  7125. 1
  7126. 1
  7127. 1
  7128. 1
  7129. 1
  7130. 1
  7131. 1
  7132. 1
  7133. 1
  7134. 1
  7135. 1
  7136. 1
  7137. 1
  7138. 1
  7139. 1
  7140. 1
  7141. 1
  7142. 1
  7143. 1
  7144. 1
  7145. 1
  7146. 1
  7147. 1
  7148. 1
  7149. 1
  7150. 1
  7151. 1
  7152. 1
  7153. 1
  7154. 1
  7155. 1
  7156. 1
  7157. 1
  7158. 1
  7159. 1
  7160. 1
  7161. 1
  7162. 1
  7163. 1
  7164. 1
  7165. 1
  7166. 1
  7167. 1
  7168. 1
  7169. 1
  7170. 1
  7171. 1
  7172. 1
  7173. 1
  7174. 1
  7175. 1
  7176. @Seawolf Luck is NOT involved with it READ abc.net.au/news/2020-07-04/victoria-coronavirus-hotel-quarantine-leaves-states-vulnerable/12420970 Quoting from the article A mandatory 14-day quarantine period for travellers returning home from overseas is based on national guidelines, but how those 14 days play out varies across states. A person who tests positive for coronavirus while in hotel quarantine doesn't need to return a negative result before they're allowed to leave, under the national guidelines. In NSW, every returned traveller must be tested at 10 days. In Victoria, people are offered tests on days 3 and 11. Mandatory testing was only introduced last weekend for NSW, and in Victoria the rules have recently been changed so if people decline testing they have to quarantine for a further 10 days. ------------------ NSW is a MUST. VIC is an OFFER. For Victoria's second COVDi-19 wave, Victora is a soft touch. ------------------ From abc.net.au/news/2020-07-04/victoria-coronavirus-hotel-quarantine-leaves-states-vulnerable/12420970 Again, Quoting from the article How is Victoria set up differently? Like other states, Victoria has strict quarantine rules where the person is forbidden from leaving the accommodation unless there is an emergency situation or an exemption based on compassionate grounds. But human error and alleged misconduct has been the main cause of resurgence in COVID-19 cases in Victoria, according to Mr Andrews. Victoria's state-run hotel quarantine has used private security contractors to guard rooms — a process that is now changing after guards contracted the virus and spread it to the community. In NSW, travellers with a fever or who are displaying COVID-19 symptoms are referred to a "Health Hotel", managed by NSW Health. Travellers who are well and have no symptoms are taken to hotels run by NSW Police. Private security guards may assist, but NSW Health says they are all given infection control training. ---------------- Luck is NOT involved with it
    1
  7177. 1
  7178. 1
  7179. 1
  7180. @Seawolf >Furthermore, VIC announced mandatory testing a day after the federal government greenlit this and said that states were allowed to do that. From theage.com.au/politics/victoria/troops-offered-from-start-of-hotel-quarantine-scheme-but-never-taken-up-20200915-p55vyg.html Recordings of meetings that set up Victoria's failed hotel quarantine program reveal Australian Defence Force troops were on offer to the Victorian government from the start but were never taken up by the state’s Emergency Management Commissioner Andrew Crisp. _Documents supplied by the Morrison government to the state inquiry into quarantine hotels on Tuesday also showed almost 500 ADF staff were working in hotels and at airports in NSW and Queensland at the same time Victoria told the army it didn’t need help_. Victoria’s decision to rely on poorly trained private security guards in its quarantine hotels – instead of a mix of police, soldiers and private guards as other states did more successfully – allowed coronavirus to escape into the community The federal government documents provided to the inquiry on Tuesday included an email with the subject heading "assistance re hotel stay security". The email was sent in April by the boss of the Commonwealth public service, Phil Gaetjens, to Chris Eccles, his Victorian public service equivalent. Mr Gaetjens wrote: "The Commonwealth would be willing to assist Victoria in a similar way [to NSW] if you wanted to reconsider your model" and use the ADF. Mr Eccles replied: "Thanks Phil." ----- Victoria's COVID-19 second wave is on Victoria's Labor state government!
    1
  7181. 1
  7182. 1
  7183. 1
  7184. 1
  7185. 1
  7186. 1
  7187. 1
  7188. 1
  7189. 1
  7190. 1
  7191. 1
  7192. 1
  7193. @@ZeeterPiehan From GPAS__2021 pdf Pension (mandated nanny state saving funds) vs GDP ratio for 2021 Five Eyes/Five Passport Group, Australia, $2,333 billion, 174.8% (CPTPP member, Nordic model), Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (USMCA, CPTPP member, Nordic model) United Kingdom, $3,564 billion, 135.1% (CPTPP member in July 2023, Nordic model) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (USMCA member) (I don't have data for NZ) Notice the Five Eyes group has similar pension assets to GDP ratio results Large-scale mandated savings funds enable the government to issue government bonds and large-scale bond buyer markets! EU Finland, $279 billion, 104.3% (Nordic model) France, $166 billion, 6.5% Germany, $548 billion, 14.5% Italy, $231 billion, 12.5% <----- PIIGS Netherlands, $1,900 billion, 214.4%, (Nordic model) Ireland, $197 billion, 49.4% <----- PIIGS Spain, $44 billion, 3.6% <----- PIIGS The EU lacks strategic savings coordination. Non-EU, Europe Switzerland, $1,163 billion, 164.3% (Nordic model) North America Mexico, $259 billion, 24.9% (USMCA, CPTPP member,) Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (USMCA, CPTPP member, Nordic model) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (USMCA member) South America Brazil, $195 billion,14.3% Chile, $243 billion, 99.2% (CPTPP member) East Asia, South East Asia China, $285 billion, 1.9% Hong Kong, $199 billion, 58.3% Japan, $3,613 billion, 73.6% (CPTPP member) South Korea, $968 billion, 61.0% Malaysia, $279 billion, 83.0% (CPTPP member) South-Central Asia India, $184 billion, 7.1%
    1
  7194. 1
  7195. 1
  7196. 1
  7197. 1
  7198. 1
  7199. 1
  7200. 1
  7201. 1
  7202. 1
  7203. 1
  7204. 1
  7205. 1
  7206. 1
  7207. 1
  7208. 1
  7209. 1
  7210. 1
  7211. 1
  7212. 1
  7213. 1
  7214. 1
  7215. 1
  7216. 1
  7217. 1
  7218. 1
  7219. 1
  7220. 1
  7221. 1
  7222. 1
  7223.  @andrewmeiklem5098  Penny Wong doesn't acknowledge the following CCP trade restrictions! Note that China has a "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" which is known as CCP's protectionist list. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  7224. 1
  7225. 1
  7226. 1
  7227. 1
  7228. 1
  7229. 1
  7230. 1
  7231. 1
  7232. 1
  7233. 1
  7234. 1
  7235. 1
  7236. 1
  7237. 1
  7238. 1
  7239. 1
  7240. 1
  7241. 1
  7242. 1
  7243. 1
  7244. 1
  7245. 1
  7246. 1
  7247. 1
  7248. 1
  7249. 1
  7250. 1
  7251. 1
  7252. 1
  7253. 1
  7254. 1
  7255. 1
  7256. 1
  7257. 1
  7258. 1
  7259. 1
  7260. 1
  7261. 1
  7262. 1
  7263. 1
  7264. 1
  7265. 1
  7266. 1
  7267. 1
  7268. 1
  7269. 1
  7270. 1
  7271. 1
  7272. 1
  7273. 1
  7274. 1
  7275. 1
  7276. 1
  7277. 1
  7278. 1
  7279. 1
  7280. 1
  7281. 1
  7282. 1
  7283. 1
  7284. 1
  7285. 1
  7286. 1
  7287. 1
  7288. 1
  7289. 1
  7290. 1
  7291. 1
  7292. 1
  7293. 1
  7294. 1
  7295. 1
  7296. 1
  7297. 1
  7298. 1
  7299. 1
  7300. 1
  7301. 1
  7302. 1
  7303. 1
  7304. 1
  7305. 1
  7306. 1
  7307. 1
  7308. 1
  7309. 1
  7310. 1
  7311. 1
  7312. 1
  7313. 1
  7314. 1
  7315. 1
  7316. 1
  7317. 1
  7318. 1
  7319. 1
  7320. 1
  7321. 1
  7322. 1
  7323. 1
  7324. 1
  7325. 1
  7326. 1
  7327. 1
  7328. 1
  7329. 1
  7330. 1
  7331. 1
  7332. 1
  7333. 1
  7334.  @warheadvun5485  >the Germans are Anglo Saxons, Anglo Saxons have been massacring the rest of the world for centuries to establish their global hegemony and white supremacy 1. For historical context, the dominant Han Mandarin language ethnic group has committed mass killings on other ethnic groups. Different languages in China are echos of different ethnic groups and kingdoms. The current CCP government inherited Imperial China's empire land area that is mostly intact. Xi Jinping's CCP government's arguments are based on Imperial China's, hence Imperial China 2.0 is reborn under the new emperor (chairman for life) Xi Jinping. Both CCP and Russian Federation inherited Imperial China's and Imperial Russia's colonial actions. Both nations think communism clean slates their colonial past. 2. British East India Company has been dismantled by the British government. The British government doesn't govern India, Canada, Australia, United States, New Zealand and 'etc'. The current British government did NOT inherit the British Empire! Your argument is hypocritical and it's NOT the same when the British government does NOT govern the non-existing British Empire while Imperial China's empire still exists under CCP. Your argument is hypocritical and it's NOT the same when the British government does NOT govern the non-existing British Empire while Russian Federation inherited MOST of the Russian Empire's land area. Communism did NOT wipe the Russian Empire's colonial past hence why the breakup of the USSR reveals Russian Empire being a fake country. Your historical context arguments are useless AND hypocritical for the current human generation.
    1
  7335. 1
  7336. 1
  7337. 1
  7338. 1
  7339. 1
  7340.  @warheadvun5485  Schiffels et al. (2016) examined the remains of three Iron Age Britons buried ca. 100 BC. A female buried in Linton, Cambridgeshire carried the maternal haplogroup H1e, while two males buried in Hinxton both carried the paternal haplogroup R1b1a2a1a2, and the maternal haplogroups K1a1b1b and H1ag1. Their genetic profile was considered typical for Northwest European populations. Though sharing a common Northwestern European origin, the Iron Age individuals were markedly different from later Anglo-Saxon samples, who were closely related to Danes and Dutch people. The indigenous Britons of Roman Britain were genetically closely related to the earlier Iron Age female Briton, and displayed close genetic links to modern Celts of the British Isles, particularly Welsh (Wales) people, suggesting genetic continuity between Iron Age Britain and Roman Britain, and partial genetic continuity between Roman Britain and modern Britain. In addition, a Brittonic legacy remains in England, Scotland and Galicia in Spain,[38] in the form of often large numbers of Brittonic place and geographical names. Some examples of geographical Brittonic names survive in the names of rivers, such as the Thames, Clyde, Severn, Tyne, Wye, Exe, Dee, Tamar, Tweed, Avon, Trent, Tambre, Navia, and Forth. Many place names in England and Scotland are of Brittonic rather than Anglo-Saxon or Gaelic origin, such as London, Manchester, Glasgow, Edinburgh, Carlisle, Caithness, Aberdeen, Dundee, Barrow, Exeter, Lincoln, Dumbarton, Brent, Penge, Colchester, Gloucester, Durham, Dover, Kent, Leatherhead, and York. You just reveal yourself as an ignorant fool.
    1
  7341. 1
  7342. 1
  7343. 1
  7344. 1
  7345.  @warheadvun5485  Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country".[8] You're a hypocrite.
    1
  7346. 1
  7347. 1
  7348. 1
  7349. 1
  7350. 1
  7351. 1
  7352. 1
  7353. 1
  7354. 1
  7355. 1
  7356. 1
  7357. 1
  7358. 1
  7359. 1
  7360. 1
  7361. 1
  7362. 1
  7363. 1
  7364. 1
  7365. 1
  7366. 1
  7367. 1
  7368. 1
  7369. 1
  7370. 1
  7371. 1
  7372. 1
  7373. 1
  7374. 1
  7375. 1
  7376. 1
  7377. 1
  7378. 1
  7379. 1
  7380. 1
  7381. 1
  7382. 1
  7383.  @Apache1970  CPC is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about the West's reciprocal protectionist advocacy e.g. Foreign entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  7384. 1
  7385.  @Apache1970  From Forbes, Title: Protectionism May Be Rising Around The World, But In China, It Never Went Away Year Date: 2016 Promises unkept? Since joining the WTO in 2001, China has repeatedly insisted that it will live up to those undertakings made on entry. In particular, the use of currency manipulation has been identified by the US as a breech of the commitment to end price controls for the purposes of protecting domestic industries. This became a major political issue from 2005 onwards, and has only recently subsided because it is assumed that the RMB is slightly overvalued on the market. Nevertheless, for years it was deliberate policy for the PBoC to accumulate US Dollars and suppress the exchange rate for the RMB, resulting in exactly the price distortions China had committed to eliminate in 2001, and fuelling an enormous trade surplus with the US, which persists and expands to this day. Furthermore TRIPS implementation has been given some effect on paper, but has made little progress when it comes to 'enforcement.' This is (according to the WTO) as recently as February 2015, fully 14 years after TRIPS was supposed to be already in effect. The US Trade Representative produces an annual report to Congress on China's WTO compliance which leaves little room to conclude they have so far lived up to their accession commitments. The most recent several-hundred-page document - produced in December 2015 - recites a long list of small measures, committees established, announcements made and new administrative complications faced, all continuing disputes over an agreement theoretically in effect since 2001. Although, therefore, protectionism is rising around the world, it is also true to say that existing practices of protectionism have not fallen in the way that they should have since China's accession to the WTO in 2001. Because of this lack of progress in easing trade, the extended period of currency manipulation, the lack of observance of TRIPS and the sheer administrative resistance exporters face when trying to get their products into China, we now face of world of highly unbalanced trade, and rising mistrust. And it is this that is leading to rising protectionism; the simple fact that it never went away.
    1
  7386. 1
  7387. 1
  7388. 1
  7389.  @gore1089  You don't know shit. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  7390. 1
  7391. 1
  7392. 1
  7393. 1
  7394. 1
  7395. 1
  7396. 1
  7397. 1
  7398. 1
  7399. 1
  7400. 1
  7401. 1
  7402. 1
  7403. 1
  7404. 1
  7405. 1
  7406. 1
  7407. 1
  7408. 1
  7409. 1
  7410. 1
  7411. 1
  7412.  @KingOfZamunda  >one party instigated the euromaidan coup That's a FALSE narrative from Putin. Date: Jan. 7, 2010 Yanukovych: Ukraine will remain a neutral state. "It’s certain that Ukraine was and will be non-aligned state… We strive neither to join NATO nor the [CIS]CSTO [Collective Security Treaty Organization]. We’ll maintain a neutral status," Yanukovych said in an interview with the Komsomolskaya Pravda in Ukraine newspaper. -------- The trigger for Euromaidan was Yanukovych initiated non-neutrality policies such as joining a trade block instead of executing Switzerland-style neutrality. UK leaving the EU and joining CPTPP proves freedom of association. Before Euromaidan, Russia, however, has successfully used political and economic leverage to dissuade Ukraine from signing the E.U. deal. In the months prior to the Vilnius summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a trade war with Kiev, blocking nearly all imports from Ukraine and cutting energy supplies to the country. In turn, this reduced Ukrainian exports by 25 percent and shrank the economy by 1.5 percent. Some trade background for the context From Tradebarrier Index (lower score = less trade barriers) New Zealand's tariff score is 2.92 Australia's tariff score is 3.03 UK's tariff score is 3.94 (after Brexit) Japan's tariff score is 4.05 US's tariff score is 4.54 Germany's tariff score is 4.88 EU's tariff score is 4.88 Russia's tariff score is 6.16 <-------- China's tariff score is 6.8 <------ Russia wants to maintain its higher trade protectionist policies. ------ Victoria Nuland herself doesn't have the power, but about 73% of the MPs—voted to "remove Viktor Yanukovych from the post of president of Ukraine" has the power. Don't assume Ukraine's president has absolute power when 73% of the MPs have voted to "remove Viktor Yanukovych from the post of president of Ukraine". Ukraine Constitution 1991, Article 17, disallows foreign military bases after 2017. According to former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, Ukraine's constitution forbids the country from hosting foreign military bases after 2017. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1991, Article 17 when Yanukovych renewed foreign base lease with Russia. In 2018, President Petro Poroshenko's constitution amendment allowed temporary foreign military bases. LOL
    1
  7413. 1
  7414. 1
  7415. 1
  7416. 1
  7417. 1
  7418. 1
  7419. 1
  7420. 1
  7421. 1
  7422. 1
  7423. 1
  7424. 1
  7425. 1
  7426. 1
  7427. 1
  7428. 1
  7429. 1
  7430. 1
  7431.  @wanted001  You're not a real Aussie. A real Aussie will have Australia 1st mindset e.g. Australian freedom of navigation, obtaining nuclear power generation for itself, Australian interest in Antarctica, Australian interest in Oceania, advocate reciprocal trade policies. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  7432. 1
  7433. 1
  7434. 1
  7435. 1
  7436. 1
  7437. 1
  7438. 1
  7439. 1
  7440. 1
  7441. 1
  7442. 1
  7443. 1
  7444. 1
  7445. 1
  7446. 1
  7447. 1
  7448. 1
  7449. 1
  7450. 1
  7451. 1
  7452. 1
  7453. 1
  7454. 1
  7455. 1
  7456. 1
  7457. 1
  7458. 1
  7459. 1
  7460. 1
  7461. 1
  7462. 1
  7463. 1
  7464. 1
  7465. 1
  7466. 1
  7467. 1
  7468.  @prhodan59  Air Forces Monthly had an article, "The Big Fight", about the Advanced Tactical Leadership Course (ATLC) in its April 2010 issue. The successive article (same issue), "Justifiably Proud!", was an interview with Lt. Col. Fabrice Grandclaudon, Commander of EC 1/7. "AFM: You apparently said 'the Rafale rubbed F-22 - the most modern fighter of the USAF. During six encounters the F-22 hit its goal only once'. The 27th FS doesn't remember the engagements that way and say the F-22 scored several victories against Rafale. Did you offer DACT to the Raptors and did they decline? I did not say we 'rubbed them', I said that there was only one shot claimed (ie a simulated kill) for the six that were set-up. I read in a recent issue of Air et Cosmos that it was two. As far as I am concerned, one or two shots of six Basic Fighter Manoeuvres (BFM) encounters is a victory for the F-22 but not an overwhelming one. Not like the one we claimed against the Typhoons after combat in Solenzara, Corsica during September (9 set-up: 8 to 1 for the Rafale*). The other set-ups versus F-22s were terminated for combat deck, an un-decisive situation or lack of fuel. We never shot them down, but we hope to do so soon since we are quite good opposition for them, and it is in the pilot's spirit not to give up! Like almost every nation, we offered Beyond Visual Range DACT, of course, but the F-22 was only authorized to do BFM 1v1 Within Visual Range (WVR) versus foreign countries (except the UK, with whom they did not fight even in the BFMs). I wish we could have done so, but we didn't - which bring me back to Air et Cosmos, where its information about BVR engagement with AMRAAM in stealth mode is wrong: besides the fact that we did not even fly BVR vs F-22s! F-22 was fitted with some specific device to increase their radar signature. It enabled us to have contact with them during work ups for example. But that's not the point here." ------------- 1. "one or two shots of six Basic Fighter Manoeuvres (BFM) encounters is a victory for the F-22" . 2. "We never shot them down" on another setup. Note that F-22s has to increase it's RCS for the training. In a real combat, F-22A's specific device to increase their radar signature would be turned off and Rafale's pilots would have comparably inferior situation awareness than F-22's pilots since Rafale's pilots wouldn't be aware of F-22A's specific location i.e. it's another F-22's mass (simulated) killing of F-15s type scenario. Without F-22A's RCS booster, Rafale's pilots wouldn't be able to locate the F-22s for training. 3. None of the OSF pictures released by the French Ministry of Defense represented a kill.
    1
  7469. 1
  7470. 1
  7471. 1
  7472. 1
  7473. 1
  7474. 1
  7475. 1
  7476. 1
  7477. 1
  7478. 1
  7479. 1
  7480. 1
  7481. 1
  7482. 1
  7483. 1
  7484. 1
  7485. 1
  7486. 1
  7487. 1
  7488. 1
  7489. 1
  7490. 1
  7491. 1
  7492. 1
  7493. 1
  7494. 1
  7495. 1
  7496. 1
  7497. 1
  7498. 1
  7499. 1
  7500. 1
  7501. 1
  7502. 1
  7503. 1
  7504. 1
  7505. 1
  7506. 1
  7507. 1
  7508.  @klaushofken6441  On 24 April 2013, the district court of The Hague sentenced Dutch businessman Frans van Anraat to payment of damages to the victims of mustard-gas attacks in Iraq and Iran in the 1980s. Iraq's WMD issue is not yet over since European courts are chasing down European businesses that profited from the Iraqi WMD program. ----- Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq -------- STROUDSBURG, Pa.—A former United Nations weapons inspector who exchanged explicit online messages with a detective posing as a 15-year-old girl and then performed a sex act on himself in front of a webcam was sentenced Wednesday to at least 1 1/2 years in state prison. Scott Ritter, 50, was taken into custody immediately after Monroe County Judge Jennifer Sibum sentenced him to 18 to 66 months behind bars. It was the second time in eight years that Ritter, of Delmar, N.Y., found himself in legal trouble for trying to lure underage girls into illicit sex. Scott Ritter was incompetent investigator who chicken out on investigating western businesses that profited from Iraqi WMDs.
    1
  7509. 1
  7510. 1
  7511. 1
  7512. 1
  7513. 1
  7514. 1
  7515.  @marg8315  From GPAS__2021 pdf Pension (mandated nanny state saving funds) vs GDP ratio for 2021 Five Eyes/Five Passport Group, Australia, $2,333 billion, 174.8% (CPTPP member, Nordic model), Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (USMCA, CPTPP member, Nordic model) United Kingdom, $3,564 billion, 135.1% (CPTPP member in July 2023, Nordic model) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (USMCA member) (I don't have data for NZ) Notice the Five Eyes group has similar pension assets to GDP ratio results Large-scale mandated savings funds enable the government to issue government bonds and large-scale bond buyer markets! EU Finland, $279 billion, 104.3% (Nordic model) France, $166 billion, 6.5% Germany, $548 billion, 14.5% Italy, $231 billion, 12.5% <----- PIIGS Netherlands, $1,900 billion, 214.4%, (Nordic model) Ireland, $197 billion, 49.4% <----- PIIGS Spain, $44 billion, 3.6% <----- PIIGS The EU lacks strategic savings coordination. Non-EU, Europe Switzerland, $1,163 billion, 164.3% (Nordic model) North America Mexico, $259 billion, 24.9% (USMCA, CPTPP member,) Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (USMCA, CPTPP member, Nordic model) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (USMCA member) South America Brazil, $195 billion,14.3% Chile, $243 billion, 99.2% (CPTPP member) East Asia, South East Asia China, $285 billion, 1.9% Hong Kong, $199 billion, 58.3% Japan, $3,613 billion, 73.6% (CPTPP member) South Korea, $968 billion, 61.0% Malaysia, $279 billion, 83.0% (CPTPP member) South-Central Asia India, $184 billion, 7.1%
    1
  7516. 1
  7517. 1
  7518. 1
  7519. 1
  7520. 1
  7521. 1
  7522. 1
  7523. 1
  7524. 1
  7525. 1
  7526. 1
  7527. 1
  7528. 1
  7529. 1
  7530. 1
  7531. 1
  7532. 1
  7533. 1
  7534. 1
  7535. 1
  7536. 1
  7537. 1
  7538. 1
  7539. 1
  7540. 1
  7541. 1
  7542. 1
  7543. 1
  7544. 1
  7545. 1
  7546. 1
  7547. 1
  7548. 1
  7549. 1
  7550. 1
  7551. 1
  7552. 1
  7553. 1
  7554. 1
  7555. 1
  7556. 1
  7557. 1
  7558. 1
  7559. 1
  7560. 1
  7561. 1
  7562. 1
  7563. 1
  7564. 1
  7565.  @Lisa-bh7kk  Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country".[8] You're a hypocrite.
    1
  7566. 1
  7567. 1
  7568. 1
  7569. 1
  7570. 1
  7571. 1
  7572. 1
  7573. 1
  7574. 1
  7575. 1
  7576. 1
  7577. 1
  7578. 1
  7579. 1
  7580. 1
  7581. 1
  7582. 1
  7583. 1
  7584. 1
  7585. 1
  7586. 1
  7587. 1
  7588. 1
  7589. 1
  7590. 1
  7591. 1
  7592. 1
  7593. 1
  7594. 1
  7595. 1
  7596. 1
  7597. 1
  7598. 1
  7599. 1
  7600. 1
  7601.  @tonymaly6484  >in Russia, many people think that all this is to stop cooperation between Russia and Europe in the energy industry a Nope. The root cause. Date: Jan. 7, 2010 Yanukovych: Ukraine will remain a neutral state. "It’s certain that Ukraine was and will be non-aligned state… We strive neither to join NATO nor the [CIS]CSTO [Collective Security Treaty Organization]. We’ll maintain a neutral status," Yanukovych said in an interview with the Komsomolskaya Pravda in Ukraine newspaper. -------- The trigger for Euromaidan was Yanukovych initiated non-neutrality policies such as joining a trade block instead of executing Switzerland-style neutrality. UK leaving the EU and joining CPTPP proves freedom of association. Before Euromaidan, Russia, however, has successfully used political and economic leverage to dissuade Ukraine from signing the E.U. deal. In the months prior to the Vilnius summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a trade war with Kiev, blocking nearly all imports from Ukraine and cutting energy supplies to the country. In turn, this reduced Ukrainian exports by 25 percent and shrank the economy by 1.5 percent. Some trade background for the context From Tradebarrier Index (lower score = less trade barriers) New Zealand's tariff score is 2.92 Australia's tariff score is 3.03 UK's tariff score is 3.94 (after Brexit) Japan's tariff score is 4.05 US's tariff score is 4.54 Germany's tariff score is 4.88 EU's tariff score is 4.88 Russia's tariff score is 6.16 <-------- China's tariff score is 6.8 <------ Russia wants to maintain its higher trade protectionist policies.
    1
  7602. 1
  7603. 1
  7604. 1
  7605. 1
  7606. 1
  7607. From Dr Paul Bevilaqua of Lockheed Marin. I quote ----------------- Because the shaft-driven lift fan propulsion concept was new and therefore considered the riskiest of the alternative propulsion systems, it was decided to reduce the perceived risk of our aircraft design by replacing the canard with a more conventional aft tail. This was easily done, as one of the advantages of the lift fan concept was the ability to rebalance the aircraft with relatively small changes in the size and location of the fan. The three JAST variants are shown in Fig. 18. In May 1995, Lockheed Martin gave the Yak Aircraft Corporation a contract to provide an independent assessment of our STOVL propulsion system and airframe concept and also to provide lessons learned from their STOVL aircraft development programs. They were provided with copies of everything regarding the competing CALF concepts that had been published in the open literature, including a copy of the U.S. patent [9] on the Lockheed dual-cycle propulsion system. Drawing on their own experience developing STOVL aircraft, Yak engineers provided us with predictions of the STOVL performance, including ground effects, of all three competing aircraft concepts. They also provided a risk assessment of each concept. In addition, they provided useful design and performance information for the lift systems of the Yak STOVL aircraft. Their final report was very complimentary of our design and gave us confidence that it was the right concept ----------- Fig. 18 already has the three X-35 variants before May 1995's Lockheed Martin contracted the Yak Aircraft Corporation
    1
  7608. 1
  7609. Note that China has a "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" which is known as CCP's protectionist list. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  7610. 1
  7611. 1
  7612. 1
  7613. 1
  7614. 1
  7615. 1
  7616. 1
  7617. 1
  7618. 1
  7619. 1
  7620. 1
  7621. 1
  7622. 1
  7623. 1
  7624. 1
  7625. 1
  7626. 1
  7627. 1
  7628. 1
  7629. 1
  7630. 1
  7631. 1
  7632. 1
  7633. 1
  7634. 1
  7635. 1
  7636. 1
  7637. 1
  7638. 1
  7639. 1
  7640.  @matthews1082  > the Indians of Indian subcontinent 1. For historical context, the dominant Han Mandarin language ethnic group has committed mass killings on other ethnic groups. Different languages in China are echos of different ethnic groups and kingdoms. The current CCP government inherited Imperial China's empire land area that is mostly intact. Xi Jinping's CCP government's arguments are based on Imperial China's, hence Imperial China 2.0 is reborn under the new emperor (chairman for life) Xi Jinping. Both CCP and Russian Federation inherited Imperial China's and Imperial Russia's colonial actions. Both nations think communism clean slates their colonial past. 2. British East India Company has been dismantled by the British government. The British government doesn't govern India, Canada, Australia, United States, New Zealand and 'etc'. The current British government did NOT inherit the British Empire! Your argument is hypocritical and it's NOT the same when the British government does NOT govern the non-existing British Empire while Imperial China's empire still exists under CCP. Your argument is hypocritical and it's NOT the same when the British government does NOT govern the non-existing British Empire while Russian Federation inherited MOST of the Russian Empire's land area. Communism did NOT wipe the Russian Empire's colonial past hence why the breakup of the USSR reveals Russian Empire being a fake country. Your historical context arguments are useless AND hypocritical for the current human generation.
    1
  7641. 1
  7642. 1
  7643. 1
  7644. 1
  7645. 1
  7646. 1
  7647.  @matthews1082  >Well Ukraine had been a part of the Russian Empire Ukraine was part of Poland since the Ukrainian language has Polish influence, the Polish influence with the Ukrainian language is the major separation from the Russian language. From 1804 until the Ukrainian War of Independence, the Ukrainian language was banned from schools in the Russian Empire, of which the biggest part of Ukraine (Central, Eastern, and Southern) was a part at the time. During the reign of Catherine II of Russia, the Cossack Hetmanate's autonomy was progressively destroyed. After several earlier attempts, the office of hetman was finally abolished by the Russian government in 1764, and his functions were assumed by the Little Russian Collegium, thus fully incorporating the Hetmanate into the Russian Empire. On May 7, 1775, Empress Catherine II issued a direct order that the Zaporozhian Sich was to be destroyed. On June 5, 1775, Russian artillery and infantry surrounded the Sich and razed it to the ground. The Russian troops disarmed the Cossacks, and the treasury archives were confiscated. The Koshovyi Otaman, Petro Kalnyshevsky, was arrested and incarcerated in exile at Solovetsky Monastery. This marked the end of the Zaporozhian Cossacks. ---- 1. 1863–1864 January uprising, Russian Empire crushed Polish, Lithuanian, and Ukrainian insurgents uprising. 2. Soviet–Ukrainian War occurred between 1917 to 1921, a war between the Ukrainian People's Republic vs the Bolsheviks i.e. Ukrainian Soviet Republic and Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (modern-day Russian Federation). 3. 2014, Russo-Ukrainian War. March 1, 2014, the Federation Council of the Russian Federation unanimously adopted a resolution to petition Russian President Vladimir Putin to use military force in Ukraine. Ukrainian People's Republic is the modern-day Ukraine. These are unresolved "old world" issues that existed before the US being a superpower.
    1
  7648. 1
  7649. 1
  7650. 1
  7651. 1
  7652. 1
  7653. 1
  7654. 1
  7655. 1
  7656. 1
  7657. 1
  7658. 1
  7659. 1
  7660. 1
  7661. 1
  7662. 1
  7663. 1
  7664. 1
  7665. 1
  7666. 1
  7667. 1
  7668. 1
  7669. 1
  7670. 1
  7671. 1
  7672. 1
  7673. 1
  7674. 1
  7675. 1
  7676. 1
  7677. 1
  7678. 1
  7679. 1
  7680. 1
  7681. 1
  7682. 1
  7683. 1
  7684. 1
  7685. 1
  7686. 1
  7687. 1
  7688. 1
  7689. 1
  7690. 1
  7691. 1
  7692. 1
  7693. 1
  7694. 1
  7695. 1
  7696. 1
  7697. 1
  7698. 1
  7699. 1
  7700. 1
  7701. 1
  7702. 1
  7703. 1
  7704. 1
  7705. 1
  7706. 1
  7707. 1
  7708. 1
  7709. 1
  7710. 1
  7711. 1
  7712. 1
  7713. 1
  7714.  @ramanpatel4287  Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country".[8] You're a hypocrite.
    1
  7715. 1
  7716. 1
  7717. 1
  7718. 1
  7719. 1
  7720. 1
  7721. 1
  7722. 1
  7723. 1
  7724.  @ameliagfawkes512  Against your "bankster wars" narrative. From GPAS__2021 pdf Pension (mandated nanny state saving funds) vs GDP ratio for 2021 Five Eyes/Five Passport Group, Australia, $2,333 billion, 174.8% (CPTPP member, Nordic model), Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (USMCA, CPTPP member, Nordic model) United Kingdom, $3,564 billion, 135.1% (CPTPP member in July 2023, Nordic model) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (USMCA member) (I don't have data for NZ) Notice the Five Eyes group has similar pension assets to GDP ratio results Large-scale mandated savings funds enable the government to issue government bonds and large-scale bond buyer markets! EU Finland, $279 billion, 104.3% (Nordic model) France, $166 billion, 6.5% Germany, $548 billion, 14.5% (Don't blame foreign banks for your mistakes) Italy, $231 billion, 12.5% <----- PIIGS Netherlands, $1,900 billion, 214.4%, (Nordic model) Ireland, $197 billion, 49.4% <----- PIIGS Spain, $44 billion, 3.6% <----- PIIGS The EU lacks strategic savings coordination. Non-EU, Europe Switzerland, $1,163 billion, 164.3% (Nordic model) North America Mexico, $259 billion, 24.9% (USMCA, CPTPP member,) Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (USMCA, CPTPP member, Nordic model) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (USMCA member) South America Brazil, $195 billion,14.3% Chile, $243 billion, 99.2% (CPTPP member) East Asia, South East Asia China, $285 billion, 1.9% Hong Kong, $199 billion, 58.3% Japan, $3,613 billion, 73.6% (CPTPP member) South Korea, $968 billion, 61.0% Malaysia, $279 billion, 83.0% (CPTPP member) South-Central Asia India, $184 billion, 7.1%
    1
  7725. 1
  7726. Date: Jan. 7, 2010 Yanukovych: Ukraine will remain a neutral state. "It’s certain that Ukraine was and will be non-aligned state… We strive neither to join NATO nor the [CIS]CSTO [Collective Security Treaty Organization]. We’ll maintain a neutral status," Yanukovych said in an interview with the Komsomolskaya Pravda in Ukraine newspaper. -------- Before Euromaidan, Russia, however, has successfully used political and economic leverage to dissuade Ukraine from signing the E.U. deal. In the months prior to the Vilnius summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a trade war with Kiev, blocking nearly all imports from Ukraine and cutting energy supplies to the country. In turn, this reduced Ukrainian exports by 25 percent and shrank the economy by 1.5 percent. Some trade background for the context From Tradebarrier Index (lower score = less trade barriers) New Zealand's tariff score is 2.92 Australia's tariff score is 3.03 UK's tariff score is 3.94 (after Brexit) Japan's tariff score is 4.05 US's tariff score is 4.54 Germany's tariff score is 4.88 EU's tariff score is 4.88 Russia's tariff score is 6.16 <-------- China's tariff score is 6.8 <------ Russia wants to maintain its higher trade protectionist policies. UK leaving the EU and joining CPTPP proves freedom of association. ------ According to former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, Ukraine's constitution forbids the country from hosting foreign military bases after 2017. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1991, Article 17. In 2018, President Petro Poroshenko's constitution amendment allowed temporary foreign military bases.
    1
  7727. 1
  7728. 1
  7729. 1
  7730. 1
  7731. 1
  7732. 1
  7733. 1
  7734. 1
  7735. 1
  7736. 1
  7737. 1
  7738. 1
  7739. 1
  7740. 1
  7741. 1
  7742. 1
  7743. 1
  7744. 1
  7745. 1
  7746. 1
  7747.  @D-E-S_8559  Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country".[8] You're a hypocrite.
    1
  7748. 1
  7749. 1
  7750. 1
  7751. 1
  7752. 1
  7753. 1
  7754. 1
  7755. 1
  7756. 1
  7757. 1
  7758. 1
  7759. 1
  7760. 1
  7761. 1
  7762. 1
  7763. 1
  7764. 1
  7765. 1
  7766. 1
  7767. Note that China has a "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" which is known as CCP's protectionist list. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. ------------------------ 1. ASIO already caught Huawei spy software. 2. China attempts to encircle Australia via the south of the second island chain. 3. China went against Australia's interest in Antarctica. Australia enlisted the EU's help while NZ enlisted US help against the Russia-China team. 4. China's anti-foreign Market Access Negative List resulted in Australia's reciprocal investment restrictions. ------------------------ Note that China has a "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" which is known as CCP's protectionist list. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  7768.  @Jake12220  > it would be fine if it joined the European economic union, but not the military Wrong. Date: Jan. 7, 2010 Yanukovych: Ukraine will remain a neutral state. "It’s certain that Ukraine was and will be non-aligned state… We strive neither to join NATO nor the [CIS]CSTO [Collective Security Treaty Organization]. We’ll maintain a neutral status," Yanukovych said in an interview with the Komsomolskaya Pravda in Ukraine newspaper. -------- The trigger for Euromaidan was Yanukovych initiated non-neutrality policies such as joining a trade block instead of executing Switzerland-style neutrality. UK leaving the EU and joining CPTPP proves freedom of association. Before Euromaidan, Russia, however, has successfully used political and economic leverage to dissuade Ukraine from signing the E.U. deal. In the months prior to the Vilnius summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a trade war with Kiev, blocking nearly all imports from Ukraine and cutting energy supplies to the country. In turn, this reduced Ukrainian exports by 25 percent and shrank the economy by 1.5 percent. Some trade background for the context From Tradebarrier Index (lower score = less trade barriers) New Zealand's tariff score is 2.92 Australia's tariff score is 3.03 UK's tariff score is 3.94 (after Brexit) Japan's tariff score is 4.05 US's tariff score is 4.54 Germany's tariff score is 4.88 EU's tariff score is 4.88 Russia's tariff score is 6.16 <-------- China's tariff score is 6.8 <------ Russia wants to maintain its higher trade protectionist policies.
    1
  7769. 1
  7770. 1
  7771. 1
  7772. 1
  7773. 1
  7774. 1
  7775. 1
  7776. 1
  7777. 1
  7778. 1
  7779. 1
  7780. 1
  7781. 1
  7782. 1
  7783. 1
  7784. 1
  7785. 1
  7786. 1
  7787. 1
  7788. 1
  7789. 1
  7790. 1
  7791. 1
  7792. 1
  7793. 1
  7794. @Mary Jenson In the 1980s, Taiwan was developing a nuclear bomb when the US told them to stop i.e. VP Geoge H Bush has a pro-China position. >Look at how we faced a world pandemic and who was the country sending millions upon millions of tax revenue (from the people) to "help" the world? Oxford-AstraZeneca company today reached a $750 million agreement with CEPI and Gavi to support the manufacturing, procurement and distribution of 300 million doses of the potential vaccine, with delivery starting by the end of the year. In addition, AstraZeneca reached a licensing agreement with SII to supply one billion doses for low-and-middle-income countries, with a commitment to provide 400 million before the end of 2020. Under the arrangement, the Serum Institute of India (SSI) will produce 1 billion doses under licence from AstraZeneca for India and low-income countries. The Oxford-AZ deal includes the potential for non-exclusive, royalty-free licences to be offered to manufacturers to support production that is free-of-charge, at-cost, or at cost with limited margin supply. A bilateral licensing deal is in effect between Oxford/AZ and the Serum Institute India (SII). Australia paid $2.2 billion USD for Novavax's 40 million vaccine doses, Pfizer/BioNTech 10 million vaccine doses with a total of 134 million doses from four COVID-19 vaccines. The cost difference between Australia and India shows a large-scale discount given by UK's Oxford university and AstraZeneca. Unlike AstraZeneca, Pfizer/BioNTech didn't provide the vaccines at-cost. Pfizer had shipped around 430 million Corminaty doses to 91 countries at May 2021. The supply deals have resulted in a massive financial haul: Pfizer reported $3.5 billion in global Corminaty sales for the first quarter 2021. Pfizer and BioNTech will provide an additional 500 million doses of their Covid-19 vaccine to the U.S. government to be donated to lower-income countries. Australia's total Pfizer doses are 125 million, and Australia has purchased more than 280 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines. Australia covers Oceania and parts of the South East Asia region. UK (for India, Africa), US (for South America, Africa), and Australia (for Oceania and parts of South East Asia) cover their respective interest area.
    1
  7795. 1
  7796. 1
  7797. 1
  7798. 1
  7799. 1
  7800. 1
  7801. 1
  7802. 1
  7803. 1
  7804.  @krashmee >Our vaccines saved most of you, That's a red herring. >We are investigating these to invade others or destroy world! For Iraq issue 1. On 24 April 2013, the district court of The Hague sentenced Dutch businessman Frans van Anraat to payment of damages to the victims of mustard-gas attacks in Iraq and Iran in the 1980s 2. Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq
    1
  7805. 1
  7806. 1
  7807. 1
  7808. 1
  7809. 1
  7810. 1
  7811. 1
  7812. 1
  7813. 1
  7814. 1
  7815. 1
  7816. 1
  7817. 1
  7818. 1
  7819. 1
  7820. 1
  7821. 1
  7822. 1
  7823. 1
  7824. 1
  7825. 1
  7826. 1
  7827. 1
  7828. 1
  7829. 1
  7830. 1
  7831. 1
  7832. 1
  7833. 1
  7834. 1
  7835. 1
  7836. 1
  7837. 1
  7838. 1
  7839. 1
  7840. 1
  7841. 1
  7842. 1
  7843. 1
  7844. 1
  7845. 1
  7846. 1
  7847. 1
  7848. 1
  7849. 1
  7850. 1
  7851. 1
  7852. 1
  7853. 1
  7854. 1
  7855. 1
  7856. 1
  7857. 1
  7858.  @andrewlankford9634  In 1841, Germany : As Marx and Bauer were both atheists, in March 1841 they began plans for a journal entitled Archiv des Atheismus (Atheistic Archives), but it never came to fruition. In 1842, Germany : Marx moved to Cologne in 1842, where he became a journalist, writing for the radical newspaper Rheinische Zeitung (Rhineland News), expressing his early views on socialism and his developing interest in economics. In 1843, Marx became co-editor of a new, radical left-wing Parisian newspaper, the Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher (German-French Annals), then being set up by the German activist Arnold Ruge to bring together German and French radicals. Therefore Marx and his wife moved to Paris in October 1843. On 28 August 1844, Marx met the German socialist Friedrich Engels at the Café de la Régence, beginning a lifelong friendship. An outline of "Marxism" had definitely formed in the mind of Karl Marx by late 1844. In 1845, after receiving a request from the Prussian king, the French government shut down Vorwärts!, with the interior minister, François Guizot, expelling Marx from France.[93] At this point, Marx moved from Paris to Brussels, where he hoped to once again continue his critical studies of study of capitalism and political economy. Unable either to stay in France or to move to Germany, Marx decided to emigrate to Brussels in Belgium in February 1845. However, to stay in Belgium he had to pledge not to publish anything on the subject of contemporary politics. In Brussels, Marx associated with other exiled socialists from across Europe, including Moses Hess, Karl Heinzen and Joseph Weydemeyer. In April 1845, Engels moved from Barmen in Germany to Brussels to join Marx and the growing cadre of members of the League of the Just now seeking home in Brussels. France and Germany kicked out Karl Marx due to his political views .
    1
  7859. 1
  7860. 1
  7861. 1
  7862. 1
  7863. 1
  7864. 1
  7865. 1
  7866. 1
  7867. 1
  7868. 1
  7869. 1
  7870. 1
  7871. 1
  7872. 1
  7873. 1
  7874. 1
  7875. 1
  7876. 1
  7877. 1
  7878. 1
  7879. 1
  7880. 1
  7881. 1
  7882. 1
  7883. 1
  7884. 1
  7885. 1
  7886. 1
  7887. 1
  7888. 1
  7889. 1
  7890. 1
  7891. 1
  7892. 1
  7893. 1
  7894. 1
  7895. 1
  7896. 1
  7897. 1
  7898. 1
  7899. 1
  7900. 1
  7901. 1
  7902. 1
  7903. 1
  7904. 1
  7905. 1
  7906. 1
  7907. 1
  7908. 1
  7909. 1
  7910. 1
  7911. 1
  7912.  @lewishowe8349  >Americans cannot understand the difference between a civic-nation (bonds enforced through law) and ethno-nations (bonds through blood). US's closest Nazi idealogy is from Democract's CSA era pro-black slaves and Jim Crow (racial segregation). Modern Democrats have attempted to overcompensate with the past via DEI i.e. racial socialism for favored minorities. For COVID-19 federal aid for restaurants, the Biden-Harris administration discriminated against Whites via DEI. Biden-Harris administration's The Chips Act's execution has racially discriminated against Asians and Whites via DEI. The left should look in the mirror for their side's racist hypocrisy. The USA (with people from the UK, Germany, Spain, Italy and 'etc') is the prototype similar to the European Union. US's McDonald's, Pizza Hut, and Boeing exports are echos from European origins i.e. UK (e.g. McDonald's name), Germany (e.g. hamburgers, Boeing name, Christmas tree), and Italy (e.g. Pizza Hut). European mixing pot led to the Amercian culture which is mostly Western European. Canada has mostly a British and French mix. US's German culture was largely suppressed during WW1. English language domination in the USA is largely due to the British Empire's influence which continued with the USA despite breaking away from the UK. "Boeing" sounds German when compared to the Latin "Airbus" i.e. blame France. When I listen to Eurovision being dominated by the English language, it's like another USA mix. The English language is a blended language between Germanic and Romance languages i.e. a blended language between the two major language families on mainland Europe.
    1
  7913. 1
  7914. 1
  7915. 1
  7916. 1
  7917. 1
  7918.  Hans Otto Kroeger Kaethler  China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  7919. 1
  7920. 1
  7921. 1
  7922. 1
  7923. 1
  7924. 1
  7925. 1
  7926. 1
  7927. 1
  7928.  Hans Otto Kroeger Kaethler  >USA is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies. DON'T MIX UP WITH TARIFF ON PRODUCTS AND INVESTMENT PROTESTIONIST ISSUES. China Negative List 2020 Let's focus Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. China has invested in mining companies in Australia and the US. From mining.com/web/china-locking-critical-resources-uss-backyard/ Rare earth robbery In 2016 Molycorp’s Mountain Pass Mine in California was shut down because it couldn’t compete with the low rare earth oxide prices coming out of China – which has cornered the market in REOs with about 95% of the world’s production. The timing was bad because Molycorp had just invested $1.25 billion to expand the light rare earths facility. It was forced into bankruptcy, until last summer when an investor group with ties to the Chinese government bought the mine for $20.5 million, beating out American bidders including ERP Strategic Minerals. https://graphitepublications.com/will-chinas-outrageous-rare-earth-monopoly-persist/ China's rare earth near-monopoly was built on SOE (state-own enterprise) which driven private competitors from the market. Second, importing countries have been concerned with the agglutination of Chinese mining companies in what appears to be a calculated move to make China’s monopoly even more monopolistic. Most prominently, Bao Gang Rare Earth (BGRE), a state-owned REE company forcibly merged with four smaller companies and numerous smaller companies were shut down to create a monopoly in Northern China which accounts for two-thirds of China’s output. Moreover, China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) decreed minimum production thresholds for domestic companies in early August 2012, essentially truncating the smallest REE producers as well as with 20% of China’s rare earths capacity. Third, Chinese companies have determinedly acted to protect their monopoly by buying potential international rivals. Lynas Corp., an Australian company displayed plans to open a new REE mine when in May 2009, a company owned by the Chinese government swooped in with a $366 million bid and bought a majority stake in it. --------- Australian OR American mining companies CAN NOT DO THE SAME THING IN CHINA It's a no-brainer when countries like Australia impose restrict investment reciprocity against China. GTFO.
    1
  7929. 1
  7930. 1
  7931. 1
  7932. 1
  7933. 1
  7934. 1
  7935. 1
  7936. 1
  7937. 1
  7938. 1
  7939. 1
  7940. 1
  7941. 1
  7942. 1
  7943. 1
  7944. 1
  7945. 1
  7946. 1
  7947. 1
  7948. 1
  7949. 1
  7950.  @paynelesor3940  >Higher incarceration rates per capita Do the crime, do the time. In general, East Asian teens focus on school studies. >higher rates of premature death Ancient virus lurking in remote Australia, affecting thousands of Aboriginal adults In a brightly lit lab in the outback town of Alice Springs, researchers have been inspecting vials of blood infected with an ancient virus that has lurked in Australia for thousands of years. It is called T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1— or HTLV-1 — and Australia has the highest levels in the world. A distant relative of HIV, it is a blood-borne virus that can be sexually transmitted or passed from mother to child. The virus can lead to inflammation of the skin, eyes and lungs. "You're also at risk of developing things like leukemia, so blood cancer, and becoming disabled through spinal cord injuries," researcher Joel Liddle said. "Once your pro-viral load is high, you're at a high risk of poor health." Researchers said, in most cases, leukaemia caused by the virus could be "rapidly fatal". Researchers from the Baker Institute for Heart and Diabetes in Alice Springs estimated 45 percent of Indigenous adults in central Australia had HTLV-1 . "In remote Australia, it's so out of sight, out of mind with a lot of things, health is just one of those things," Mr Liddle said. One of the difficulties with this virus is that most of those who have HTLV-1, don't know they have it, and a vast number of Aboriginal communities have never been tested. "I think there's probably confusion and a little bit of anger, too. People [question] why haven't they been told about this," Mr Liddle said. "There's a lot of reasons to breastfeed. Prolonged breastfeeding may be something that could be addressed but that's up to Aboriginal people to decide." For Mr Liddle, an Arrernte man, a response to high rates of HTLV-1 demands a delicate approach, with intensive education work delivered in Aboriginal languages. "I think there's a lot of work to do, certainly I think at the moment, what I see as our main thing is to engage sensitively around the issues because we're dealing with people's health, and all the things and complexities that are going on in remote communities, so we have to be really mindful of that." ------ This ancient virus is related to HIV( i.e. HTLV-1) and reduces an adult's life span. Aboriginals have the highest HTLV-1 infection rates in the world. To fix this issue, non-Aboriginal R&D will be needed to cure this ancient issue, promote safe sex culture (i.e. change culture), and practise monogamy (i.e. change culture).
    1
  7951. 1
  7952. 1
  7953. 1
  7954. 1
  7955. 1
  7956. 1
  7957. 1
  7958. 1
  7959. 1
  7960. 1
  7961. 1
  7962. 1
  7963. 1
  7964. 1
  7965.  @soreeyez  >globalists EU listen to Trump False narrative. The United States remained Europe’s top supplier of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the first 3 months of 2021 as it continued to gain market share at the expense of Russia and Qatar, Europe’s second- and third-largest sources of LNG, according to the EU Commission’s latest European Gas Market Report. The US supplied 24% (4.2 Bcm) of the EU’s overall LNG imports (17 Bcm in Q1 2021); Russia placed second at 21% (3.7 Bcm); and Qatar was third at 18% (3.1 Bcm), the EU Commission reported in early July. When compared to Q4 2020, the US picked up 2% market share from January to March this year, while Russia bested Qatar to become Europe’s second-largest LNG supplier. Nigeria placed fourth, followed by Algeria and Trinidad and Tobago. A review of EU Commission reports dating back to 2019 reveals a steady quarter-to-quarter decline in Europe’s LNG purchases while it also documents the growing rivalry between the US and Russia, Qatar’s fall from dominance, and the emergence of the US as Europe’s top LNG supplier starting Q4 2019. The EU is the world’s third-largest LNG market, though its imports amounted to only about half that of Japan (36 Bcm) and China (32 Bcm) in Q1 2021. European gas consumption rose 7.6% to 132 Bcm in Q1 based on a year-on-year comparison. The commission noted that demand for gas as fuel to generate electricity rose 3.4%, also year-on-year (increasing by 4.9 TWh.) ------ January 29, 2021 Today, the new liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal on the island of Krk in Croatia and its connecting pipeline have been officially inaugurated by the prime Minister of Croatia, Andrej Plenković. The construction of the new LNG terminal and Omišalj-Zlobin gas pipeline, connecting it to the Croatian gas transmission system, have received a total of €124 million EU funding through the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF). ---- June 24, 2020 WARSAW, June 24 (Reuters) - Poland has signed contracts worth 1.9 billion zlotys ($483 million) to expand its liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal in Swinoujscie on the Baltic Sea to 8.3 billion cubic metres (bcm) by 2023 from 5 bcm now in response to increasing domestic demand. An LNG unit of Poland’s gas infrastructure operator Gaz-System and the ports of Szczecin and Swinoujscie on Wednesday signed a contract with a consortium of Porr and TGE Gas Engineering on the expansion project. “The terminal gives us the flexibility of receiving gas from different parts of the world,” Piotr Naimski, a minister responsible for energy infrasructure, told a news conference.
    1
  7966. 1
  7967. 1
  7968. 1
  7969. 1
  7970. 1
  7971. 1
  7972. 1
  7973.  @soreeyez  >It's involved in military operations in the Middle East, Turkey is a NATO member. LOL. >Africa On 16 August 2003, Libya formally admitted responsibility for Pan Am Flight 103 (Lockabie bombing) in a letter presented to the president of the United Nations Security Council. "On 10 March 2011, France was the first country in the world to recognise the National Transitional Council as the legitimate government of Libya". NATO was involved in the second phase of Libya's war and after France runs out of precision bombs. LOL. NATO ran Operation Allied Protector, a counter-piracy operation. Russia was also involved in counter-piracy operations. This is a defense operation. > Asia too. For central Asia, the US invoked Article 5 against Afghanistan due to Osama bin Laden. List of NATO operations 16 July 1992 – 22 November 1992, Serbia. (Europe) 16 October 1992 – 12 April 1993, Bosnian airspace. (Europe) 22 November 1992 – 1993, Adriatic Sea. (Europe) 13 April 1993 –20 December 1995, Bosnian airspace. (Europe) 15 June 1993 –2 October 1996, Yugoslavia. (Europe) 30 August –20 September 1995, Bosnia and Herzegovina. (Europe) 20 December 1995 -20 December 1996, Bosnia and Herzegovina. (Europe) 21 December 1996 -19 June 1998, Bosnia and Herzegovina. (Europe) 20 June 1998 -2 December 2004, Bosnia and Herzegovina. (Europe) 24 March 1999 –10 June 1999, Kosovo and Serbia. (Europe) 12 June 1999 -Present, Kosovo (Europe) 27 August 2001 -26 September 2001, Macedonia, (Europe) 9 October 2001 –16 May 2002, United States airspace. 16 October 2001 –9 November 2016, Mediterranean Sea, Maritime counter-terrorism and anti-trafficking/ 20 December 2001 – 28 December 2014, Afghanistan (Central Asia) 26 February 2003 –3 May 2003, Turkey, Border defense. 8 October 2005 –9 February 2006, Pakistan earthquake relief. (Central Asia) 17 August 2009 –15 December 2016, Red Sea, Gulf of Aden, Indian Ocean, Counter-piracy (Piracy in Somalia). (Africa) 27 March 2011 -31 October 2011, Operation Unified Protector (UNSC Resolution 1973), Libya (Africa) December 2012 – present, Turkey, Border defense. 1 January 2015 – 12 July 2021, Afghanistan. 2015 – present, Europe. Your argument is pointless.
    1
  7974. 1
  7975. 1
  7976. 1
  7977. 1
  7978. 1
  7979. 1
  7980. 1
  7981. 1
  7982. 1
  7983. 1
  7984. 1
  7985. 1
  7986. 1
  7987. 1
  7988. 1
  7989. 1
  7990. 1
  7991. 1
  7992. 1
  7993. 1
  7994. 1
  7995. 1
  7996. 1
  7997. 1
  7998. 1
  7999. 1
  8000. 1
  8001. 1
  8002. 1
  8003. 1
  8004. 1
  8005. 1
  8006. 1
  8007. 1
  8008. 1
  8009. 1
  8010. 1
  8011. 1
  8012. 1
  8013. 1
  8014. 1
  8015. 1
  8016. 1
  8017. 1
  8018. 1
  8019. 1
  8020. 1
  8021. 1
  8022.  @anushmikael2540  https://web.archive.org/web/20170804135017/http://www.sukhoi.org/eng/planes/military/su30mk/lth/ SU-30MK empty weight estimate from OEM 24900 Kg - (2 x 105 Kg + 2 x 253 Kg + 5270 kg) = 18914 kg or 41698 lbs Select a desired combat range and load SU-30MK with fuel load and calculate the effective wing loading. Basic wing loading empty weight without factoring forward/rear body and vortex lift factors. Fuel and weapons load can change with different missions. F-16C Block 50 Empty Weight: 18,900 lbs Wing area: 300 ft² Wing loading: 63 lbs/ sq feet. Thrust weight ratio: 1.51 : 1 F-18E Empty Weight: 31,500 lbs Wing area: 500 ft² Wing loading: 63 lbs/ sq feet. Thrust weight ratio: 1.40 : 1 SU-30MK Empty Weight: 41,698 lbs Wing area: 667 ft² Wing loading: 62.51 lbs/ sq feet. Thrust weight ratio: 1.33 : 1 F-35A Empty weight: 28,999 lbs (Year 2015). Wing area: 460 ft² Wing loading: 63.04 lbs/ sq feet. Thrust weight ratio: 1.48 : 1 SU-35 http://www.flightjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/SUKHOI.pdf Empty Weight: 40,565 lbs (no reference) Wing area: 667 ft² Wing loading: 60.82 lbs/ sq feet. Thrust weight ratio: 1.42 : 1 (29000 lbf each engine) F-15C Empty Weight: 28,000 lbs Wing area: 608 ft² Wing loading: 46 lbs/ sq feet. Thrust weight ratio: 1.70 : 1 F-22A Empty Weight: 43,340 lb Wing area: 840 ft² Wing loading: 51.59 lbs/ sq feet. Thrust weight ratio: 1.71 : 1 F-35A with Option Block 1 engine upgrade Empty weight: 28,999 lb (Year 2015). Wing area: 460 ft² Wing loading: 63.04 lbs/ sq feet. Thrust weight ratio: 1.57 : 1 ( 6 percent thrust upgrade) Thrust weight ratio: 1.63 : 1 (10 percent thrust upgrade) https://www.defenceconnect.com.au/strike-air-combat/3475-enhancing-the-capabilities-of-australia-s-super-hornets-with-block-iii-upgrades F-18E Block 3 Empty Weight: 31,500 lbs Wing area: 500 ft² Wing loading: 63 lbs/ sq feet. Thrust weight ratio: 1.64 : 1 Fukoff Anush Mikael
    1
  8023. 1
  8024. 1
  8025. 1
  8026. 1
  8027. 1
  8028. 1
  8029. 1
  8030. 1
  8031. 1
  8032. 1
  8033. 1
  8034. 1
  8035. 1
  8036. 1
  8037. 1
  8038. @Antun Šturlić Against https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/russias-su-35-vs-americas-stealth-f-35-who-wins-fight-81996 1. From http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22committees%2Fcommjnt%2Ffb49a6a2-5080-4c72-a379-e4fd10cc710a%2F0002%22 From RAAF's F-22A vs F-15D with *DRFM jamming pipe*. “…the ability to actually have that data fusion that the aeroplane has makes an incredible difference to how you perform in combat. I saw it first hand on a Red Flag mission in an F15D against a series of fifth-generation F22s. We were actually in the red air. In five engagements we never knew who had hit us and we never even saw the other aeroplane…. After that particular mission I went back and had a look at the tapes on the F22, and the difference in the situational awareness in our two cockpits was just so fundamentally different. That is the key to fifth-generation. That is where I have trouble with the APA analysis…. To me that is key: it is not only stealth; it is the combination of the EOS and the radar to be able to build a comprehensive picture. In that engagement I talked about at Nellis, in Red Flag, the ability to be in a cockpit with a God’s-eye view of what is going on in the world was such an advantage over a fourth-generation fighter – and arguably one of the best fourth-generation fighters in existence, the F15. But even with a DRFM jamming pipe , we still had no chance in those particular engagements. And at no time did any of the performance characteristics that you are talking about have any relevance to those five engagements.” ----- When compared to RAAF, nationalinterest.org's TNI Staff has no experience between F-22's AMRAAM against F-15D with DRFM jamming pipe . https://www.reddit.com/r/F35Lightning/comments/8a66ta/out_of_the_shadows_rnlaf_experiences_with_the/ Out Of The Shadows: RNLAF experiences with the F-35A - Combat Aircraft Magazine May 2018 1. Dutch revealed F-35's digital radio frequency memory jammer (DRFM, so-called active stealth) capability along which is enhanced with passive stealth. 2. Dutch F-35 Block 3F, "F-35 sits somewhere in between the F-16 and F/A-18 when it comes to within visual range manoeuvring'". 3. Lightest empty weight F-16A MLU air-superority model needs to be clean (no weapons, no external tanks) to make visual range dogfight interesting against combat loaded F-35A Block 3F. AIM-120D has two-way data link with fighters like F-35 which uses launching fighter's AESA radar, EO-DAS sensors and passive radar sensors on it's wing edge. 2. F-35A Block 4.3 has six AIM-120 type missiles for its internal weapons bay. Most F-35s are beyond Block 3F. 3. Japan has exchanged its micro-AESA radar seeker with UK's Meteor missile. 4. F-35 supports AIM-132 IR with it's internal weapons bay instead of AIM-9X. USAF has other plans with F-35's A2A missiles e.g. Raytheon Peregrine. https://www.raytheon.com/capabilities/products/peregrine-air-air-missile Raytheon Peregrine missiles doubles the weapon bay's payload for F-35 and has higher range when compared to AIM-120D. 5. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3b-b762QRY Super Hornet's high AoA+minimum turn radius advantage holding it's own against F-15's high energy turn rate advantage dogfight example http://nettsteder.regjeringen.no/kampfly/2015/11/20/a-fly-f-35-erfaringer-fra-den-forste-uka/ More F-16 vs F-35 from Norwegian pilot. I quote Overall, flying the F-35 reminds me a bit of flying the F/A-18 Hornet, but with an important difference: It has been fitted with a turbo
    1
  8039. 1
  8040. 1
  8041. 1
  8042. 1
  8043. 1
  8044. 1
  8045. 1
  8046. 1
  8047.  @aleksandarmanojlovic1189  From http://www.warisboring.com/2009/02/10/russian-super-fighter-not-so-scary/ F-35 critic Pierre Sprey comments on Flankers 1. The Su-30MK is simply another modification of the Su-27, a not-very-high-performing Russian imitation of our F-15 that had its prototype flight in 1977. The new version is significantly heavier and has poorer dogfight acceleration and turn than the original, mainly because of all the weighty and draggy gadgetry (e.g., canards, vectored thrust nozzles) added to allow these spectacular maneuvers. 2. The spectacular maneuvers … are purely and simply airshow tricks, intended to wow the gullible. Not one of these maneuvers has any application to combat, because they can only be performed at speeds well under 150 knots. At that speed in a dogfight against any competent pilot, your life expectancy is measured in seconds. 3. My guess is that there are no more than six pilots in all of Russia that can actually fly these maneuvers — and that they have been in training for years in order to trot out these tricks at international airshows. 4. Executing these wonderful tricks at the Paris airshow with these Olympic-athlete type of pilots, the Russians have crashed two of the Su-30 “Wunderwaffen,” one in 1999 and one in 2006. 5. The Russians have, in fact, palmed off versions of the Wunderwaffen to the Chinese, as well as to the Indians, Malaysians, Algerians, and the dreaded Venezuelans. Despite these triumphs of Russian salesmanship. I’m not losing much sleep over the specter of the awesome Su-30 in the hands of these superb air forces. The more of these turkeys the Russkies sell, the longer the now-ancient F-16 (designed in 1972) will reign supreme as the world’s best fighter.
    1
  8048. 1
  8049. 1
  8050. 1
  8051. 1
  8052. 1
  8053. 1
  8054. 1
  8055.  @aleksandarmanojlovic1189  One of the differences between SU-30 and SU-35 comes with its radar i.e. radar upgrades on SU-30 leads to installing canards since heavier radar can change CG which can degrade flight performance. Canards are not required for SU-35. Again, for radar, there cooling and electrical feed differences between SU-30 and SU-35. For USN, F/A-18E has radar changes from Block 1's non-AESA to Block 2's AESA. F/A-18A has center body replacement to improve combat performance from F/A-18C. For USAF, there are internal structural differences between 8000 life hours F-15C to 20,000 life hours F-15EX. Initial F-15A models have 4000 life hours. F-15EX's longer service life enables longer sustain G loads. There are several AESA radar upgrades across lower life hours usage F-15C and F-15Es. F-15EX replaces high life hours usage airframe F-15C. F-15EX or "F-15 Advance" has a Hornet style digital fly-by-wire system i.e. Russians changed MiG 29 into MiG 35 with a similar fly-by-wire upgrade. Boeing is not allowed to change F-15 model numbers due to new model numbers requires fly-off competition rules. There are G load differences between F-15A and F-15C models. There are flight envelope differences with F-15C and F-15E-1 (29K lbf engine version). The majority of F-15A units are ditched in the boneyard. There no standardize Block builds like F-16/F-22/F-35 for F-15. F-22A has reached Block 30/35 F-16V has reached Block 70/72 F-35A has nearly reached Block 4 Lot 15. F-35C and F-35B models have not reached Block 3F. F-35A's Block 3F flight control software can't be applied for F-35C due to flight dynamic changes from different wing and tail. F-35C has a different vortex lift generation design from F-35A. For future Block upgrades, F-35 program is currently executing durability testing for F-135 engine upgrades.
    1
  8056. 1
  8057. 1
  8058. 1
  8059. 1
  8060. 1
  8061. 1
  8062. 1
  8063. 1
  8064. 1
  8065. 1
  8066. 1
  8067. The Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical.
    1
  8068. 1
  8069. 1
  8070. 1
  8071. 1
  8072. 1
  8073. 1
  8074. 1
  8075. 1
  8076. 1
  8077. 1
  8078. 1
  8079. 1
  8080. 1
  8081. 1
  8082. 1
  8083. 1
  8084. 1
  8085. 1
  8086. 1
  8087. 1
  8088.  @nextlifeonearth  (D) concerning memory as the direct target of ALU instructions is the only aspect that's central to what distinguishes the x86 pseudo-RISC kernel from a true RISC kernel. If some person complaining about x86 doesn't mention this, his or her argument is half-baked. Here, again, Chris was not as forthcoming as he ought to have been. He actually comments on write ports to the register file as a pertinent modern design issue with complex trade-offs. x86 requires fewer write ports through its unique capacity to exploit the dcache as part of a (hugely) extended register file. The rmw instruction family in x86 is a bit like zero page in 6502/6809, as both of these allow memory to substitute for registers you don't have at far less cost than you would otherwise experience. The rmw instructions form a computed address on the fly—without committing this to a named register—and then operate on the memory location (both a read and a write), also without committing this to a named register file. This is why the register colouring algorithm for the original x86 ever survived to live another day, despite the gross inadequacy of the named register file. What does end up a bit stressed out in silicon is what the Pentium Pro used to call the MOB: memory order buffer. A lot more addresses need to be checked for ordering requirements (mostly use of overlapping memory addresses in close succession). I once read a discussion by a core member of the Athlon design team who said that this was almost a blessing in disguise. In a pure RISC design, you have to perform virtual address translation twice: once on read, again on write. In implicitly fused rmw on x86, you only need to perform virtual address translation once. And so the final score: a busier (and hotter) MOB, but a less busy (and less hot) TLB.
    1
  8089. 1
  8090. 1
  8091. 1
  8092. 1
  8093. 1
  8094. 1
  8095. 1
  8096. 1
  8097. 1
  8098. 1
  8099. 1
  8100. 1
  8101. 1
  8102. 1
  8103. 1
  8104. 1
  8105. 1
  8106. 1
  8107. 1
  8108. 1
  8109. 1
  8110. 1
  8111. 1
  8112. 1
  8113. 1
  8114. 1
  8115. 1
  8116. 1
  8117. 1
  8118. 1
  8119. 1
  8120. 1
  8121. 1
  8122. https://www.forbes.com/sites/douglasbulloch/2016/10/12/protectionism-may-be-rising-around-the-world-but-in-china-it-never-went-away/#5dc3f5df73da Protectionism May Be Rising Around The World, But In China It Never Went Away Promises unkept? Since joining the WTO in 2001, China has repeatedly insisted that it will live up to those undertakings made on entry. In particular, the use of currency manipulation has been identified by the US as a breech of the commitment to end price controls for the purposes of protecting domestic industries. This became a major political issue from 2005 onwards, and has only recently subsided because it is assumed that the RMB is slightly overvalued on the market. Nevertheless, for years it was deliberate policy for the PBoC to accumulate US Dollars and suppress the exchange rate for the RMB, resulting in exactly the price distortions China had committed to eliminate in 2001, and fuelling an enormous trade surplus with the US, which persists and expands to this day. Furthermore TRIPS implementation has been given some effect on paper, but has made little progress when it comes to 'enforcement.' This is (according to the WTO) as recently as February 2015, fully 14 years after TRIPS was supposed to be already in effect. The US Trade Representative produces an annual report to Congress on China's WTO compliance which leaves little room to conclude they have so far lived up to their accession commitments. The most recent several-hundred-page document - produced in December 2015 - recites a long list of small measures, committees established, announcements made and new administrative complications faced, all continuing disputes over an agreement theoretically in effect since 2001. Although, therefore, protectionism is rising around the world, it is also true to say that existing practices of protectionism have not fallen in the way that they should have since China's accession to the WTO in 2001. Because of this lack of progress in easing trade, the extended period of currency manipulation, the lack of observance of TRIPS and the sheer administrative resistance exporters face when trying to get their products into China, we now face of world of highly unbalanced trade, and rising mistrust. And it is this that is leading to rising protectionism; the simple fact that it never went away. ----------------------
    1
  8123. 1
  8124. 1
  8125. 1
  8126. 1
  8127. 1
  8128. 1
  8129. 1
  8130. 1
  8131. 1
  8132. 1
  8133. 1
  8134. 1
  8135. 1
  8136. 1
  8137. 1
  8138. 1
  8139. 1
  8140. 1
  8141. 1
  8142. 1
  8143. 1
  8144. 1
  8145. 1
  8146. 1
  8147. 1
  8148. 1
  8149. 1
  8150. 1
  8151. 1
  8152. 1
  8153. 1
  8154. 1
  8155. 1
  8156. 1
  8157. 1
  8158. 1
  8159. 1
  8160. 1
  8161. 1
  8162. 1
  8163. 1
  8164. 1
  8165. 1
  8166. 1
  8167. 1
  8168. 1
  8169. 1
  8170. 1
  8171. 1
  8172. 1
  8173. 1
  8174. 1
  8175. 1
  8176. 1
  8177. 1
  8178. 1
  8179. 1
  8180. 1
  8181. 1
  8182. 1
  8183. 1
  8184. 1
  8185. 1
  8186. 1
  8187. 1
  8188. 1
  8189. 1
  8190. 1
  8191. 1
  8192. 1
  8193. 1
  8194. 1
  8195. 1
  8196. 1
  8197. 1
  8198. 1
  8199. 1
  8200. 1
  8201. 1
  8202. 1
  8203. 1
  8204. 1
  8205. 1
  8206. 1
  8207. 1
  8208. 1
  8209. 1
  8210. 1
  8211. 1
  8212. 1
  8213. 1
  8214. 1
  8215. 1
  8216. 1
  8217. 1
  8218. 1
  8219. 1
  8220. 1
  8221. 1
  8222. 1
  8223. 1
  8224. 1
  8225. 1
  8226. 1
  8227. 1
  8228. 1
  8229. 1
  8230. 1
  8231. 1
  8232. @gamingtideX The Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". --------------- In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical.
    1
  8233. 1
  8234. 1
  8235. 1
  8236. 1
  8237. 1
  8238. 1
  8239. 1
  8240. 1
  8241. 1
  8242. 1
  8243. 1
  8244. 1
  8245. 1
  8246. 1
  8247. 1
  8248. 1
  8249. 1
  8250. 1
  8251. 1
  8252. 1
  8253. 1
  8254. 1
  8255. 1
  8256. 1
  8257. 1
  8258. 1
  8259. 1
  8260. 1
  8261. 1
  8262. 1
  8263. 1
  8264. 1
  8265. 1
  8266. 1
  8267. 1
  8268. 1
  8269. 1
  8270. 1
  8271. 1
  8272. 1
  8273. 1
  8274. 1
  8275. 1
  8276. 1
  8277. 1
  8278. 1
  8279. 1
  8280. 1
  8281. 1
  8282. 1
  8283. 1
  8284. 1
  8285. 1
  8286. 1
  8287. 1
  8288. From Amnesty Bangladesh: Reveal whereabouts of disappeared journalist, end repression Bangladesh must put an end to the wave of repression in the country that has seen journalists being targeted and others threatened, Amnesty International said today, as the human rights organization called on the government to promptly amend the draconian Digital Security Act in compliance with international human rights law. Three journalists including a prominent newspaper editor have been accused of “deteriorating law and order” under the Act and one journalist has been brutally tortured this year for producing critical reports. Another journalist accused under the Act is feared to be a victim of enforced disappearance. More than 1,000 cases have been filed under the Act since it was put into implementation in October 2018. “Journalists in Bangladesh are being silenced under the draconian Digital Security Act. Recent cases against journalists, including a prominent newspaper editor, a journalist who was tortured and a newspaper editor feared to be a victim of enforced disappearance are chilling reminders that freely expressing one’s views in Bangladesh can come at a very high cost,” said Saad Hammadi, South Asia Campaigner at Amnesty International. Enforced disappearance Police have denied any information about the whereabouts of journalist Shafiqul Islam Kajol, who has not been seen or heard from since 10 March 2020, a day after police registered a case against him and 31 others under Bangladesh’s troubling Digital Security Act for publishing “false, offensive and defamatory” content on Facebook. Despite Bangladesh’s denial of the allegations of enforced disappearances, human rights organisations have repeatedly raised concerns about the practice of unacknowledged detention and enforced disappearances. Last year, the local human rights organization Odhikar documented at least 34 incidents of alleged enforced disappearances. Eight of them were later found dead, 17 were shown arrested while the fate and whereabouts of the other nine remain unknown. When reviewing Bangladesh’s initial report on its implementation of the Convention Against Torture, the UN Committee Against Torture regretted that Bangladesh did not provide any information about the status of investigations into allegations of enforced disappearances. “No amount of consolation can heal the trauma and anxiety lived by the families of the victims of enforced disappearance, without knowledge about what happened to their loved ones. We urge the Bangladesh government to heed the appeals of the families, look at their suffering and urgently launch investigations to determine their whereabouts,” said Saad Hammadi. Shrinking space for freedom of expression Shafiqul Islam Kajol is accused of “deteriorating law and order” by publishing “false, offensive and defamatory” content on Facebook in a case against prominent newspaper editor Matiur Rahman Chowdhury and 30 others under the draconian Digital Security Act. The law gives the power to security agencies to hold individuals indefinitely in pretrial detention. If convicted, they could each face up to seven years in jail. More than 1,000 cases have been filed under this Act since it was put into implementation in October 2018. The cybercrime tribunal has dismissed more than 200 cases for lacking sufficient evidence into the allegations.
    1
  8289. 1
  8290. 1
  8291. 1
  8292. 1
  8293. 1
  8294. 1
  8295. 1
  8296.  @chrisgriffiths2533  Information from Aug 2020 Queensland renewable energy projects committed or contracted since 2015. FAR NORTH & NORTH WEST 1 Lakeland Solar & Storage: 10.8MW 2 Kidston Pumped Hydro Storage Project: 250MW 3 Kidston Solar One: 50MW 4 Hughenden Solar Farm: 18MW 5 Kennedy Energy Park: 15MW 6 Kennedy Energy Park: 43.2MW 7 Mount Emerald Wind Farm: 180.45MW 8 Tableland Mill upgrade: 24MW NORTH EAST 9 Clare Solar Farm: 100MW 10 Haughton Solar Farm: 100MW 11 Clermont Solar Farm: 75MW 12 Rugby Run Solar Farm: 65MW 13 Middlemount Solar Farm: 34MW 14 Ross River Solar Farm: 116MW 15 Sun Metals: 124.4MW 16 Daydream Solar Farm: 150MW 17 Hamilton Solar Farm: 57.5MW 18 Hayman Solar Farm: 50MW 19 Collinsville Solar Farm: 42.5MW 20 Whitsunday Solar Farm: 57.5MW CENTRAL 21 Emerald Solar Park: 68MW 22 Lilyvale Solar Farm: 100MW 23 Barcaldine Solar Farm: 20MW 24 Longreach Solar Farm: 15MW DARLING DOWNS & SOUTH WEST 25 MacIntyre CleanCo Wind Farm: 103MW 26 MacIntyre Wind Farm: 923MW 27 Warwick Solar Farm: 64MW 28 Oakey 1 Solar Farm: 25MW 29 Yarranlea solar QLD: 100MW 30 Maryrorough Solar Farm: 34MW 31 Oakey 2 Solar Farm: 55MW 32 Western Downs Solar Farm: 400MW 33 Baking Board solar farm: 19.9MW 34 Darling Downs Solar Farm: 108.5MW 35 Coopers Gap Wind Farm: 453MW 36 Gangarri Solar Farm: 120MW WIDE BAY 37 Childers Solar Farm: 56MW 38 Susan River Solar Farm: 75MW SOUTH EAST 39 Brisbane Airport Solar System: 6MW 40 Sunshine Coast Solar Farm: 15MW Collectively, these are small installations when compared to the NT-Singapore solar project's 20 gigawatts (20,000 MW) solar and 36-42 gigawatt hours of mega battery storage. The NT-Singapore project will attempt to power 5.56 million populated city-state's 15 percent of their electricity needs from 2028.
    1
  8297. 1
  8298. 1
  8299. 1
  8300. 1
  8301. 1
  8302. 1
  8303. 1
  8304. 1
  8305. 1
  8306. 1
  8307. 1
  8308. 1
  8309. 1
  8310. 1
  8311. 1
  8312. 1
  8313. 1
  8314. 1
  8315. 1
  8316. 1
  8317. 1
  8318. 1
  8319. 1
  8320. 1
  8321. 1
  8322. 1
  8323. 1
  8324. 1
  8325. 1
  8326. 1
  8327. 1
  8328. 1
  8329. 1
  8330. 1
  8331. 1
  8332. 1
  8333. 1
  8334. 1
  8335. 1
  8336. 1
  8337. 1
  8338. 1
  8339. 1
  8340. 1
  8341. 1
  8342. 1
  8343. 1
  8344.  @efffiel6565 The Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country".[8] You're a hypocrite.
    1
  8345. 1
  8346. 1
  8347. 1
  8348. 1
  8349. 1
  8350. 1
  8351. 1
  8352. 1
  8353. 1
  8354. 1
  8355. 1
  8356. 1
  8357. 1
  8358. 1
  8359. 1
  8360. 1
  8361. 1
  8362. Michel Beauregard That's a red herring. Cars are made by multiple smaller parts. https://graphitepublications.com/will-chinas-outrageous-rare-earth-monopoly-persist/ China's rare earth near monopoly was built on SOE (state own enterprise) which driven private competitors from the market. From the article (from 2010) Heavy importers of these REEs such as the U.S., Germany, and Japan believe these rationales disguise China’s true exploitative motive: to force foreign factories to move to China to keep their costs low and their supply high Second, importing countries have been concerned with the agglutination of Chinese mining companies in what appears to be a calculated move to make China’s monopoly even more monopolistic. Most prominently, Bao Gang Rare Earth (BGRE), a state-owned REE company forcibly merged with four smaller companies and numerous smaller companies were shut down to create a monopoly in Northern China which accounts for two-thirds of China’s output. Moreover, China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) decreed minimum production thresholds for domestic companies in early August 2012, essentially truncating the smallest REE producers as well as with 20% of China’s rare earths capacity. Third, Chinese companies have determinedly acted to protect their monopoly by buying potential international rivals. Lynas Corp., an Australian company displayed plans to open a new REE mine when in May 2009, a company owned by the Chinese government swooped in with a $366 million bid and bought a majority stake in it. ---------- http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703321004575427050544485366 China Dangles Rare-Earth Resources to Lure Investment BEIJING—China is cautiously using rare-earth resources as bait for foreign investment that could bring in sophisticated technologies that it needs. Industry and government officials have begun talking about a Chinese government plan to offer access to its rare-earth resources—which are used in products such as hybrid-car batteries and missiles and are under strict export restrictions—to get companies including electronics manufacturers and auto makers to set up rare-earth-processing plants in China. ---------- https://theconversation.com/why-china-could-never-sign-on-to-the-trans-pacific-partnership-56361 State-owned enterprises (SOEs) The TPP requires that no subsidies should be provided to an SOE for its international business expansion. The goal: to ensure competition between an SOE and a private enterprise takes place on a level playing field inside the host country. But China’s 150,000 SOEs form the bedrock of the Chinese economy and therefore have certain privileges. About a thousand SOEs are listed in the Shanghai or Shenzhen Stock Exchanges, indicating they are commercial in nature. More than 150 of these are managed by the central SASAC, and the list includes some of the largest companies in the world. The Chinese government assists these SOEs in various ways, including preferential interest rates. Although there have been exceptions under the TPP (for example New Zealand was able to get exemptions for its powerful cooperative Fonterra), it would have been an uphill battle for China to negotiate exemptions for so many of its SOEs engaged in various international operations within TPP member countries. --- CPTPP was designed to be anti-China SOE. CPTPP's nominal GDP for 2018 is $13.06 Trillion (not including interested countries that wants to join CPTPP e.g. UK, South Korea, Colombia). Including UK and SK into CPTPP results in $16 Trillion economy with 619 million population. EU's GDP minus UK has about $16.73 Trillion GDP market. China has $14.09 Trillion GDP.
    1
  8363. 1
  8364. 1
  8365. 1
  8366. 1
  8367. 1
  8368. 1
  8369. 1
  8370. 1
  8371. 1
  8372. 1
  8373. 1
  8374. 1
  8375. 1
  8376. 1
  8377. 1
  8378. 1
  8379. 1
  8380. 1
  8381. 1
  8382. 1
  8383. 1
  8384. 1
  8385. 1
  8386. 1
  8387. 1
  8388. 1
  8389. 1
  8390. 1
  8391. 1
  8392. 1
  8393. 1
  8394. 1
  8395. 1
  8396. 1
  8397. 1
  8398. 1
  8399. 1
  8400. 1
  8401. 1
  8402. 1
  8403. 1
  8404. 1
  8405. 1
  8406. 1
  8407. 1
  8408. 1
  8409. 1
  8410. 1
  8411. 1
  8412. 1
  8413. 1
  8414. 1
  8415. 1
  8416. 1
  8417. 1
  8418. 1
  8419. 1
  8420. 1
  8421. 1
  8422. 1
  8423. 1
  8424. 1
  8425. 1
  8426. 1
  8427. 1
  8428. 1
  8429. 1
  8430. 1
  8431. Russian_conquest_of_Central_Asia 1718-1847: Gaining control of the Kazakh Steppe Fall of the Kazakh Khanate (1847) 1839: Failed attack on Khiva. See Khivan campaign of 1839. 1847–1853: The Syr Darya line 1847–1864: Down the eastern side 1864–1868: Kokand and Bukhara subdued, Russian conquest of Bukhara 1875–1876: Liquidation of the Kokand Khanate 1873: The conquest of Khiva 1879–1885: Turkmenistan: Geok Tepe, Merv and Panjdeh 1879: Lomakin's defeat at Geok Tepe 1884: The annexation of Merv 1885: Expansion stopped at Panjdeh 1872–1895: The Eastern Mountains 1867–1877: Yakub Beg 1871–1883: temporary occupation of Kulja 1893: Pamirs occupied Results speak themselves with Imperial Russia/Russian Federation having the largest land area in the world! -------------------- Grand Duchy of Moscow (1263–1547) 1368–1372 Lithuanian-Muscovite War 1376 Muscovite-Volga Bulgars war 1467–1469 Qasim War 1471 Battle of Shelon 1480 Great stand on the Ugra river 1478 Siege of Kazan 1492–1494 First Muscovite-Lithuanian War 1495–1497 Russo-Swedish War 1500–1503 Second Muscovite-Lithuanian War 1505–1507 Russo-Kazan War 1507–1508 Third Muscovite-Lithuanian War 1512–1522 Fourth Muscovite-Lithuanian War 1534–1537 Fifth Muscovite-Lithuanian War Tsardom of Russia (1547–1721) 1552 Siege of Kazan 1552–1556 Tatar Rebellion 1554–1557 Ivan the Terrible’s Swedish War 1556 Russian conquest of Astrakhan 1558–1583 Livonian War 1568–1570 Astrakhan Expedition 1570–1572 Ivan the Terrible’s Crimean War 1580–1762 Russian conquest of Siberia 1590–1595 Boris Godunov’s Swedish War 1606–1607 Bolotnikov Rebellion 1610–1617 Ingrian War 1632–1634 Smolensk War 1651–1653 Alexis I’s Persian War 1652–1689 Sino–Russian border conflicts 1654–1667 First Northern War 1656–1658 Second Northern War 1670–1671 Razin’s Rebellion 1676–1681 Feodor III’s Turkish War 1683–1700 Great Turkish War 1700–1721 Great Northern War 1704–1711 Third Bashkir Rebellion 1707–1708 Bulavin Rebellion 1717 Peter the Great’s Khivan War 1717–1847 Kazakh-Russian conflicts Russian Empire (1721–1917) 1722–1723 Persian Expedition of Peter the Great 1733–1738 War of the Polish Succession Rhineland 1735–1739 Russo-Austro-Turkish War 1735–1740 Fourth Bashkir Rebellion 1740–1748 War of the Austrian Succession 1756–1763 Seven Years' War 1768–1769 Koliivshchyna Rebellion 1768–1772 War of the Bar Confederation 1768–1774 Catherine the Great’s First Turkish War 1773–1775 Pugachev's Rebellion 1787–1792 Catherine the Great’s Second Turkish War 1788–1790 Catherine the Great’s Swedish War 1792 Catherine the Great’s Polish War, Second Partition of Poland 1794 Kościuszko Uprising, Third Partition of Poland 1796 Persian Expedition of Catherine the Great 1804–1813 Alexander I’s Persian War 1806–1812 Alexander I’s Turkish War 1808–1809 Finnish War 1817–1864 Caucasian War 1826–1828 Nicholas I’s Persian War 1828–1829 Nicholas I’s Turkish War 1830–1831 November uprising, crushed Polish uprising. 1839–1841 Second Turko-Egyptian War 1839–1895 Russian conquest of Central Asia 1863–1864 January uprising, crushed Polish, Lithuanian and Ukrainian insurgents uprising. 1899–1901 Boxer Rebellion, Results speak themselves with Imperial Russia/Russian Federation having the largest land area in the world! Soviet Union (1922–1991) 1924 August Uprising, Consolidation of Soviet rule in Georgian SSR 1924 Tatarbunary Uprising, Crushing of the Soviet-inspired rebellion. 1925–1926 Urtatagai conflict, 1929 Sino-Soviet conflict, USSR defeats China 1929 Red Army intervention in Afghanistan, USSR defeated. 1930 Red Army intervention in Afghanistan (1930), USSR defeats Basmachi. 1932–1941 Soviet–Japanese border conflicts, USSR defeats Imperial Japan. 1936–1939 Spanish Civil War, USSR-backed proxy has been defeated. 1937 Islamic Rebellion in Xinjiang, USSR's backed proxy defeats China. 1939 Invasion of Poland (Part of World War II), triggering WW2. Division of Polish territory between Third Reich, Soviet Union and Slovakia 1939–1940 Winter War (Part of World War II), USSR defeats Finland. 1940 Occupation of the Baltic states(Part of World War II), Occupation of the Baltic states by the Red Army 1940 Soviet occupation of Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina(Part of World War II), Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina annexed to the USSR, creation of the Moldovan SSR. 1944–1956 Guerrilla war in the Baltic states, USSR defeats Ukrainian Insurgent Army 1945 Soviet–Japanese War(Part of World War II), USSR defeats Imperial Japan. Karafuto Prefecture is annexed by the Soviet Union and incorporated into Sakhalin Oblast. Kuril Islands annexed to the Soviet Union 1953 East German Uprising, Soviet Union crushed East German demonstrators. 1968 Invasion of Czechoslovakia, Soviet military presence in Czechoslovakia until 1991. 1969 Zhenbao Island Incidentm, USSR defeats China. 1974–1991 Eritrean War of Independence, USSR's proxy defeated. 1975–1991 Angolan Civil War, Independence of Namibia 1977–1978 Ethio-Somali War. Somalia broke all ties with Soviet Union. 1979–1989 Soviet–Afghan War, Failed Soviet attempt to quell Afghan Mujahedeen insurgency Russian Federation (1991-present) 1991–1993 Georgian Civil War, Zviadist revolt crushed. 1991–1993 War in Abkhazia, Russian-backed Abkhazia gained de facto independence from Georgia. 1992 Transnistria War, Russian- Transnistria gained de facto independence from Moldova. 1992 East Prigorodny Conflict, Expulsion of ethnic Ingush from Prigorodny by Ossetian militia 2008 Russo-Georgian War, Expansion of Russain backed Abkhazia and South Ossetia at the expense of Georgia. 2014–present Russo-Ukrainian War, Russian annexation of Crimea 2018–present Central African Republic Civil War, Ongoing.
    1
  8432. 1
  8433. 1
  8434. 1
  8435. 1
  8436. 1
  8437. 1
  8438. 1
  8439. 1
  8440. 1
  8441. 1
  8442. 1
  8443. 1
  8444. 1
  8445. 1
  8446. 1
  8447. 1
  8448. 1
  8449. 1
  8450. 1
  8451. 1
  8452. 1
  8453. 1
  8454. 1
  8455. 1
  8456. 1
  8457. 1
  8458. 1
  8459. 1
  8460. 1
  8461. 1
  8462. 1
  8463. 1
  8464. 1
  8465. 1
  8466. 1
  8467. 1
  8468. 1
  8469. 1
  8470. 1
  8471. 1
  8472. 1
  8473. 1
  8474. 1
  8475. 1
  8476. 1
  8477. 1
  8478. 1
  8479. 1
  8480. 1
  8481. 1
  8482. 1
  8483. 1
  8484. 1
  8485. 1
  8486. 1
  8487. 1
  8488. 1
  8489. 1
  8490. 1
  8491. 1
  8492. 1
  8493. 1
  8494. 1
  8495. 1
  8496. 1
  8497. 1
  8498. 1
  8499. 1
  8500. 1
  8501. 1
  8502. 1
  8503. 1
  8504. 1
  8505. 1
  8506. 1
  8507. 1
  8508. 1
  8509. 1
  8510. 1
  8511. 1
  8512. 1
  8513. 1
  8514. 1
  8515. 1
  8516. 1
  8517. 1
  8518. 1
  8519. 1
  8520. 1
  8521. 1
  8522. 1
  8523. 1
  8524. 1
  8525. 1
  8526. 1
  8527. 1
  8528. 1
  8529. 1
  8530. 1
  8531. 1
  8532. 1
  8533. 1
  8534. 1
  8535. 1
  8536. 1
  8537. 1
  8538. 1
  8539. 1
  8540. 1
  8541. 1
  8542. 1
  8543. 1
  8544. 1
  8545. 1
  8546. 1
  8547. 1
  8548. 1
  8549. 1
  8550. 1
  8551. 1
  8552. 1
  8553. 1
  8554. 1
  8555. LIU KUN https://theconversation.com/why-china-could-never-sign-on-to-the-trans-pacific-partnership-56361 State-owned enterprises (SOEs) The TPP requires that no subsidies should be provided to an SOE for its international business expansion. The goal: to ensure competition between an SOE and a private enterprise takes place on a level playing field inside the host country. But China’s 150,000 SOEs form the bedrock of the Chinese economy and therefore have certain privileges. About a thousand SOEs are listed in the Shanghai or Shenzhen Stock Exchanges, indicating they are commercial in nature. More than 150 of these are managed by the central SASAC, and the list includes some of the largest companies in the world. The Chinese government assists these SOEs in various ways, including preferential interest rates. Although there have been exceptions under the TPP (for example New Zealand was able to get exemptions for its powerful cooperative Fonterra), it would have been an uphill battle for China to negotiate exemptions for so many of its SOEs engaged in various international operations within TPP member countries. ----- CPTPP was designed to be anti-China SOE. Using IMF 2018 GDP numbers CPTTP has 11 Pacific ocean countries with $13.06 Trillion GDP market with Japan, Canada, Australia and Mexico as it's major economies. South Korea joins CPTTP sometime in 2018. UK is interested joining CPTTP after Brexit. Including UK and SK into CPTPP results in $16 Trillion economy with 619 million population.? EU's GDP minus UK has about $16.73 Trillion GDP market. Australia, Canada, Malaysia, New Zealand, Brunei and Singapore are already part of British Commonwealth countries. China has 14.09 Trillion GDP.
    1
  8556. 1
  8557. 1
  8558. 1
  8559. 1
  8560. 1
  8561. 1
  8562. 1
  8563. 1
  8564. 1
  8565. 1
  8566. 1
  8567.  Three Mee  Western Acts of Colonial Genocide in - USA. Invalid argument for the 21st centrury Western Acts of Colonial Genocide in - Africa. Invalid argument for the 21st centrury Western Acts of Colonial Genocide in - India. Invalid argument for the 21st centrury Western Acts of Colonial Genocide in - East Asia.Invalid argument for the 21st centrury Western Acts of Colonial Genocide in - South America. Invalid argument for the 21st centrury Western Acts of Colonial Genocide in - Canada. Invalid argument for the 21st centrury Western Acts of Colonial Genocide in the Carribbean. Invalid argument for the 21st centrury Western Acts of Colonial Genocide in - China. Invalid argument for the 21st centrury Western Acts of Colonial Genocide in - Australia. Invalid argument for the 21st centrury Western Acts of Colonial Genocide in - New Zealand. Invalid argument for the 21st centrury Western Acts of Colonial Genocide in - Vietnam. Invalid argument for the 21st centrury Western Acts of Colonial Genocide in - Libya Invalid argument for the 21st centrury Western Acts of Colonial Genocide in - Palestine. Israel's problem Western Acts of Colonial Genocide in - Myanmar. Invalid argument for the 21st centrury Western Acts of Colonial Genocide in - Singapore. Invalid argument for the 21st centrury Western Acts of Colonial Genocide in - Middle East. Iraq invaded Kuwait trigger. Western Acts of Colonial Genocide in - Afghanistan. September 9/11 trigger Western Acts of Colonial Genocide in - Philippines. Invalid argument for the 21st centrury Western Acts of Colonial Genocide in - Pakistan. Invalid argument for the 21st centrury Western Acts of Colonial Genocide in - Bangladesh. Invalid argument for the 21st centrury Western Acts of Colonial Genocide in - The Whole Planet. Invalid argument for the 21st centrury
    1
  8568. 1
  8569. 1
  8570. 1
  8571.  @suzyrottencrotch5132  Not a complete narrative. In 2008, German chancellor Angela Merkel (from East Germany) blocked Ukraine's NATO membership. President Frank-Walter Steinmeier, who served as foreign minister in two of Merkel's cabinets, on Monday admitted that he made a "mistake" in pushing for Nord Stream 2, the controversial pipeline built to double Russian gas imports to Germany. "My adherence to Nord Stream 2 was clearly a mistake. We were holding on to bridges that Russia no longer believed in and from which our partners had warned us about," he said, according to German media reports. The United States and EU members like Poland had deeply opposed the 10-billion-euro ($12 billion) pipeline which bypasses Ukraine, depriving Kyiv of gas transit fees. After obstinately defending it through its construction, Germany finally put the project on ice following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Like Merkel, Steinmeier has come under fire over the pipeline project. His Social Democrats in particular have over the years pushed for closer ties with Russia. Merkel's predecessor Gerhard Schroeder, a Social Democrat, has refused to quit key posts at Russian energy giants Rosneft and Gazprom despite Putin's war on Ukraine. Admitting his miscalculation, Steinmeier said his "assessment was that Vladimir Putin would not accept the compete economic, political and moral ruin of his country for his imperial madness." "Like others, I was wrong." ----- Conclusion: Modern Germany almost created the "Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact" situation that railroaded other EU member countries.
    1
  8572. 1
  8573. 1
  8574. 1
  8575. 1
  8576. 1
  8577. 1
  8578. 1
  8579. 1
  8580. 1
  8581. 1
  8582. 1
  8583. 1
  8584. 1
  8585. 1
  8586. 1
  8587. 1
  8588. 1
  8589. 1
  8590. 1
  8591. 1
  8592. 1
  8593. 1
  8594. 1
  8595. 1
  8596. 1
  8597. 1
  8598. 1
  8599. 1
  8600.  @stopthephilosophicalzombie9017  Jews' mercantilism culture bias is not much different from East Asian's mercantilism culture bias e.g. Hebrew Proverbs and Chinese Confucius doctrines. Phoenicians have maritime mercantilism culture and the Phoenicians alphabet has influenced the Greek and Latin alphabets. Phoenicians' alphabet has influenced old Hebrew, Greek and Latin alphabets. The English alphabet is on the Latin alphabet. Note that the western world's weekends with Sunday and Saturday points to Judeo-Christian origin. Bible NT has teachings on good stewardship. Both Papua New Guinea and Australia started from the poor state, but Australia has adopted UK's maritime mercantilism culture bias, hence Australia developed faster than Papua New Guinea. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_South_Korea In addition, South Koreans also laud Jews as a high achieving and accomplished group of people citing the disproportionate of successful Jewish businesspeople and Nobel Prize winners as evidence and use this as inspiration for the South Korean populace to emulate Jewish success.[6][7][8] The South Korean media often discusses the merits of "Jewish education" to the South Korean populace.[9][10] South Koreans also identify with Judaism's arduous history of being oppressed peoples, surviving adversity with nothing but intellect and ingenuity to socioeconomically succeed, as well as its strong emphasis on family.[11] Like Japan, South Korea is economically strong. South Korea's largest organized religion is Protestant with a large Evangelical Protestant segment. The two envious ideologies from loser Germany can be dangerous.
    1
  8601. 1
  8602. 1
  8603. 1
  8604. 1
  8605. 1
  8606. 1
  8607. 1
  8608. 1
  8609. 1
  8610. 1
  8611. 1
  8612. 1
  8613. 1
  8614. 1
  8615. Monique Ryan is a fool. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  8616. 1
  8617. 1
  8618. 1
  8619. 1
  8620. 1
  8621. 1
  8622. 1
  8623. 1
  8624. 1
  8625. 1
  8626. 1
  8627. 1
  8628. 1
  8629. 1
  8630. 1
  8631. 1
  8632. 1
  8633. 1
  8634. 1
  8635. 1
  8636. 1
  8637. 1
  8638. 1
  8639. 1
  8640. 1
  8641. 1
  8642. 1
  8643. 1
  8644. 1
  8645. 1
  8646. 1
  8647. 1
  8648. 1
  8649. 1
  8650. 1
  8651. 1
  8652. 1
  8653. 1
  8654. 1
  8655. 1
  8656. 1
  8657. 1
  8658. 1
  8659. 1
  8660. 1
  8661. 1
  8662. 1
  8663. 1
  8664. 1
  8665. 1
  8666. 1
  8667. 1
  8668. 1
  8669. 1
  8670. 1
  8671. 1
  8672. 1
  8673. 1
  8674. 1
  8675. 1
  8676. 1
  8677. 1
  8678. 1
  8679. 1
  8680. 1
  8681. 1
  8682. 1
  8683. 1
  8684. 1
  8685. 1
  8686. 1
  8687. 1
  8688. 1
  8689. 1
  8690. 1
  8691. 1
  8692. 1
  8693. 1
  8694. 1
  8695. 1
  8696. 1
  8697. 1
  8698. 1
  8699. 1
  8700. 1
  8701. 1
  8702. 1
  8703. 1
  8704. 1
  8705.  @alex_2020  False. Before Euromaidan, 1. Russia, has successfully used political and economic leverage to dissuade Ukraine from signing the E.U. deal. In the months prior to the Vilnius summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a trade war with Kiev, blocking nearly all imports from Ukraine and cutting energy supplies to the country. In turn, this reduced Ukrainian exports by 25 percent and shrank the economy by 1.5 percent. Date: Jan. 7, 2010 Yanukovych: Ukraine will remain a neutral state. "It’s certain that Ukraine was and will be non-aligned state… We strive neither to join NATO nor the [CIS]CSTO [Collective Security Treaty Organization]. We’ll maintain a neutral status," Yanukovych said in an interview with the Komsomolskaya Pravda in Ukraine newspaper. -------- The trigger for Euromaidan was Yanukovych initiated non-neutrality policies such as joining a trade block instead of executing Switzerland-style neutrality. UK leaving the EU and joining CPTPP proves freedom of association. Some trade background for the context From Tradebarrier Index (lower score = less trade barriers) New Zealand's tariff score is 2.92 Australia's tariff score is 3.03 UK's tariff score is 3.94 (after Brexit) Japan's tariff score is 4.05 US's tariff score is 4.54 Germany's tariff score is 4.88 EU's tariff score is 4.88 Russia's tariff score is 6.16 <-------- China's tariff score is 6.8 <------ Russia wants to maintain its higher trade protectionist policies. 2. Victoria Nuland herself doesn't have the power, but about 73% of the MPs—voted to "remove Viktor Yanukovych from the post of president of Ukraine" has the power. Don't assume Ukraine's president has absolute power when 73% of the MPs have voted to "remove Viktor Yanukovych from the post of president of Ukraine". 3. Ukraine Constitution 1991, Article 17, disallows foreign military bases after 2017. According to former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, Ukraine's constitution forbids the country from hosting foreign military bases after 2017. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1991, Article 17. In 2018, President Petro Poroshenko's constitution amendment allowed temporary foreign military bases.
    1
  8706. 1
  8707. 1
  8708. 1
  8709. 1
  8710. 1
  8711. 1
  8712. 1
  8713. 1
  8714. 1
  8715. 1
  8716. 1
  8717. 1
  8718. 1
  8719. 1
  8720. 1
  8721. 1
  8722. 1
  8723. 1
  8724. 1
  8725. 1
  8726. 1
  8727. 1
  8728. 1
  8729. 1
  8730. 1
  8731.  @rakeshhubert3031  Note that China has a "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" which is known as CCP's protectionist list. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. ------------------------ China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  8732. 1
  8733. 1
  8734. 1
  8735.  @rakeshhubert3031  READ abc.net.au/news/2020-07-04/victoria-coronavirus-hotel-quarantine-leaves-states-vulnerable/12420970 Quoting from the article A mandatory 14-day quarantine period for travellers returning home from overseas is based on national guidelines, but how those 14 days play out varies across states. A person who tests positive for coronavirus while in hotel quarantine doesn't need to return a negative result before they're allowed to leave, under the national guidelines. In NSW, every returned traveller must be tested at 10 days. In Victoria, people are offered tests on days 3 and 11. Mandatory testing was only introduced last weekend for NSW, and in Victoria the rules have recently been changed so if people decline testing they have to quarantine for a further 10 days. ------------------ NSW is a MUST. VIC is an OFFER. For Victoria's second COVDi-19 wave, Victora is a soft touch. ------------------ From abc.net.au/news/2020-07-04/victoria-coronavirus-hotel-quarantine-leaves-states-vulnerable/12420970 Again, Quoting from the article How is Victoria set up differently? Like other states, Victoria has strict quarantine rules where the person is forbidden from leaving the accommodation unless there is an emergency situation or an exemption based on compassionate grounds. But human error and alleged misconduct has been the main cause of resurgence in COVID-19 cases in Victoria, according to Mr Andrews. Victoria's state-run hotel quarantine has used private security contractors to guard rooms — a process that is now changing after guards contracted the virus and spread it to the community. In NSW, travellers with a fever or who are displaying COVID-19 symptoms are referred to a "Health Hotel", managed by NSW Health. Travellers who are well and have no symptoms are taken to hotels run by NSW Police. Private security guards may assist, but NSW Health says they are all given infection control training. ---------------- Fuckoff.
    1
  8736. 1
  8737. 1
  8738. 1
  8739. 1
  8740. 1
  8741. 1
  8742. 1
  8743. 1
  8744. 1
  8745. 1
  8746. 1
  8747. 1
  8748. 1
  8749. 1
  8750. Danny F You're a hypocrite to single out Trump's "reciprocal trade arguments when other countries engages in their own "Made In XYZ country" programs https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-steel-china/eu-raises-import-duties-on-chinese-steel-angering-beijing-idUSKBN1780VU EU already raises import duties on Chinese steel in 2017. https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-06/europe-renews-tariffs-chinese-steel-pipes-high-72 European Union Renews Tariffs On Chinese Steel Pipes As High As 72% Read http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/countries/china/ When China joined the WTO in 2001 it agreed to reform and liberalise important parts of its economy. While China has made progress, some problems remain: a lack of transparency industrial policies and non-tariff measures that discriminate against foreign companies strong government intervention in the economy, resulting in a dominant position of state-owned firms, unequal access to subsidies and cheap financing poor protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights In 2016 the EU adopted a new strategy on China mapping out the European Union's relationship with China for the next five years. The Strategy promotes reciprocity, a level playing field and fair competition across all areas of co-operation The strategy also includes a trade agenda with a strong focus on improving market access opportunities – including negotiations on a Comprehensive Agreement on Investment. It also deals with overcapacity and calling on China to engage with ambition at multilateral level. ---- https://global.handelsblatt.com/politics/trump-may-point-eu-tariffs-ifo-says-899083 “The EU is by no means the paradise for free traders that it likes to think,” said Gabriel Felbermayr, director of the ifo Center for International Economics, a division of the Munich-based ifo Institute. The European Union actually comes off as the bigger offender when compared to the US, he added. The unweighted average EU customs duty is 5.2 percent, versus the US rate of 3.5 percent, according to ifo’s database. So when Mr. Trump complains of “massive tariffs” he is not that far off the mark in several cases. And he does complain. “If the EU wants to further increase their already massive tariffs and barriers on US companies doing business there, we will simply apply a tax on their cars, which freely pour into the US,” the president tweeted earlier this month. “They make it impossible for our cars (and more) to sell there. Big trade imbalance!” .... In fact it wasn’t even Mr. Trump who first broke off negotiations over a US-EU free trade deal known as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), the German economist noted. It was actually the EU that put the unpopular talks “on ice” ahead of elections in France and Germany. ---- *Trump is late to party on tariff increase game*.
    1
  8751. 1
  8752. 1
  8753. 1
  8754. 1
  8755. 1
  8756. 1
  8757. 1
  8758. 1
  8759. 1
  8760. 1
  8761. 1
  8762. 1
  8763. 1
  8764. 1
  8765. 1
  8766. 1
  8767. 1
  8768. 1
  8769. 1
  8770. 1
  8771. 1
  8772. 1
  8773. 1
  8774. 1
  8775. 1
  8776. 1
  8777. 1
  8778. 1
  8779. 1
  8780. 1
  8781. 1
  8782. 1
  8783. 1
  8784. 1
  8785. 1
  8786. 1
  8787. 1
  8788. 1
  8789. 1
  8790. 1
  8791. 1
  8792. 1
  8793. 1
  8794. 1
  8795. 1
  8796. 1
  8797. 1
  8798. 1
  8799. 1
  8800. 1
  8801. 1
  8802. 1
  8803.  @silveriver9  On China issue https://graphitepublications.com/will-chinas-outrageous-rare-earth-monopoly-persist/ China's rare earth near-monopoly was built on SOE (state-own enterprise) which driven private competitors from the market. Rare earth is important for the electronics component production logistics chain. Heavy importers of these REEs such as the U.S., Germany, and Japan believe these rationales disguise China’s true exploitative motive: to force foreign factories to move to China to keep their costs low and their supply high -------------- https://www.forbes.com/sites/douglasbulloch/2016/10/12/protectionism-may-be-rising-around-the-world-but-in-china-it-never-went-away/#5dc3f5df73da Protectionism May Be Rising Around The World, But In China It Never Went Away Promises unkept? Since joining the WTO in 2001, China has repeatedly insisted that it will live up to those undertakings made on entry. In particular, the use of currency manipulation has been identified by the US as a breech of the commitment to end price controls for the purposes of protecting domestic industries. This became a major political issue from 2005 onwards, and has only recently subsided because it is assumed that the RMB is slightly overvalued on the market. Nevertheless, for years it was deliberate policy for the PBoC to accumulate US Dollars and suppress the exchange rate for the RMB, resulting in exactly the price distortions China had committed to eliminate in 2001, and fuelling an enormous trade surplus with the US, which persists and expands to this day. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703321004575427050544485366 After securing Rare-Earth monopoly, China Dangles Rare-Earth Resources to Lure Investment BEIJING—China is cautiously using rare-earth resources as bait for foreign investment that could bring in sophisticated technologies that it needs. Industry and government officials have begun talking about a Chinese government plan to offer access to its rare-earth resources—which are used in products such as hybrid-car batteries and missiles and are under strict export restrictions—to get companies including electronics manufacturers and auto makers to set up rare-earth-processing plants in China. Try again.
    1
  8804. 1
  8805. 1
  8806. 1
  8807. 1
  8808. 1
  8809. 1
  8810. 1
  8811. 1
  8812. 1
  8813. 1
  8814. 1
  8815. 1
  8816. 1
  8817. 1
  8818. 1
  8819. 1
  8820. 1
  8821. 1
  8822. 1
  8823. 1
  8824. 1
  8825. 1
  8826. 1
  8827. 1
  8828. 1
  8829. 1
  8830. 1
  8831. 1
  8832. 1
  8833. 1
  8834. 1
  8835. 1
  8836. 1
  8837. 1
  8838. 1
  8839. 1
  8840. 1
  8841. 1
  8842. 1
  8843. 1
  8844. 1
  8845. 1
  8846. 1
  8847. 1
  8848. 1
  8849. 1
  8850. 1
  8851. 1
  8852. 1
  8853. 1
  8854. 1
  8855. 1
  8856. 1
  8857. 1
  8858. 1
  8859. 1
  8860. 1
  8861. 1
  8862. 1
  8863. 1
  8864. 1
  8865. 1
  8866. 1
  8867. 1
  8868. 1
  8869. 1
  8870. 1
  8871. 1
  8872. 1
  8873. 1
  8874. 1
  8875. 1
  8876. 1
  8877. 1
  8878. 1
  8879.  @michaelanderson9914  >are you defending the western back coup 1. Before Euromaidan, Russia, however, has successfully used political and economic leverage to dissuade Ukraine from signing the E.U. deal. In the months prior to the Vilnius summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a trade war with Kiev, blocking nearly all imports from Ukraine and cutting energy supplies to the country. In turn, this reduced Ukrainian exports by 25 percent and shrank the economy by 1.5 percent. Russia started the 1st interference. ----- 2. Ukraine Constitution 1991, Article 17, disallows foreign military bases after 2017. According to former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, Ukraine's constitution forbids the country from hosting foreign military bases after 2017. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1991, Article 17. In 2018, President Petro Poroshenko's constitution amendment allowed temporary foreign military bases. Yanukovych is an idiot. ----- 3. Real NAZIs hate Jews and Slavs. i. 1863–1864 January uprising, Russian Empire crushed Polish, Lithuanian, and Ukrainian insurgents uprising. ii. Soviet–Ukrainian War occurred between 1917 to 1921, a war between the Ukrainian People's Republic vs the Bolsheviks i.e. Ukrainian Soviet Republic and Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (modern-day Russian Federation). iii. 2014, Russo-Ukrainian War. March 1, 2014, the Federation Council of the Russian Federation unanimously adopted a resolution to petition Russian President Vladimir Putin to use military force in Ukraine. Ukrainian People's Republic is the modern-day Ukraine. These are "old world" issues that existed before the US being a superpower.
    1
  8880. 1
  8881. 1
  8882. 1
  8883. 1
  8884. 1
  8885. 1
  8886. 1
  8887.  @jomo3564  https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/f-35-overwhelming-superiority-over-rafale-and-eurofighter-in-atlantic-trident.523986/ The F-35A's overwhelming superiority has been recorded in some of the most epic air combat in NATO history when the USAF fighter met for the Atlantic Trident (April 12-18), French Rafale fighters and British Eurofighter Typhoon Eurofighter's IRST was useless against F-35A French has Optronique secteur frontal has up to 100 Km IRST on the right side and sensor for target identification with 40 km range on the left side. http://www.opex360.com/2017/04/12/le-rafale-va-pouvoir-se-mesurer-au-f-35a-lors-de-lexercice-atlantic-trident-2017/ "The French, American and British crews will quickly get to the heart of the matter, with a first day of practice dedicated to "Basic Fighting Manœuvers", with oppositions in one against the other. Greek account of extracurricular encounters between the participants is more likely to be true than not. Firstly all the numbers he gave out were very specific and if he was pumping up the F-35 for anti Turkish reasons why say it lost one against the F-15E ? These unofficial dogfights happen all the time which we only get to hear about when participants start leaking info and there is a French report of Atlantic Trident which stated that on the first day the aircraft practiced among themselves before the official exercise began The opex360 article I quoted said they did BFM practice against themselves not the aggressor squadrons.
    1
  8888. 1
  8889. 1
  8890. 1
  8891. 1
  8892. 1
  8893. 1
  8894. 1
  8895. 1
  8896. 1
  8897. 1
  8898. 1
  8899. 1
  8900. 1
  8901. 1
  8902. 1
  8903. 1
  8904. 1
  8905. 1
  8906. 1
  8907. 1
  8908. 1
  8909. 1
  8910. 1
  8911. 1
  8912. 1
  8913. 1
  8914. 1
  8915. 1
  8916. 1
  8917. 1
  8918. 1
  8919. 1
  8920. 1
  8921. 1
  8922. 1
  8923. 1
  8924. 1
  8925. 1
  8926. 1
  8927. 1
  8928. 1
  8929. 1
  8930. 1
  8931. 1
  8932. 1
  8933. 1
  8934. 1
  8935. 1
  8936. 1
  8937. 1
  8938. 1
  8939. 1
  8940. 1
  8941. 1
  8942. 1
  8943. 1
  8944. 1
  8945. 1
  8946. 1
  8947. 1
  8948. 1
  8949. 1
  8950.  @ernstwiltmann3918  >The UK only pretends to be the imperial power it once was, and would not suffer an immediate danger by the outbreak of hostilities. Reminders, 1. The EU project is not new, and there were many attempts to create a common market on the European mainland after the fall of the original Roman Empire. 2. The UK is a nuclear weapons state and has a superior navy when compared to the French or German navies. 3. When the UK joins CPTPP, it has effectively recreated its closer relationships with Japan and CANZUK group as per pre-WW1. With the UK, CPTPP's 7 of 12 member countries are also Commonwealth members. CPTPP encapsulates the CANZUK group. Trump's action by removing the US from TPP has indirectly created CPTPP. -------- Again, for Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum context, Russia, the US, and the UK confirmed their Ukraine becoming parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and effectively abandoning their nuclear arsenal to Russia and that they would: 1. Respect Ukrainian independence and sovereignty in the existing borders. 2. Refrain from the threat or the use of force against Ukraine. 3. Refrain from using economic pressure on Ukraine to influence their politics. 4. Seek immediate Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine if they "should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used". 5. Refrain from the use of nuclear arms against Ukraine. 6. Consult with one another if questions arise regarding those commitments. China and France gave somewhat weaker individual assurances in separate documents. Better learn history when UK's entry into WW1 was via defense treaty with Belgium that was invoked when Germany invaded Belgium. US and UK are fulfilling points 4 and 6 in accordance with Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum. Budapest Memorandum's security assurances are weaker than NATO Article V.
    1
  8951. 1
  8952.  @ernstwiltmann3918  >They are no longer an Empire The Five Power Defence Arrangements (FPDA), is a series of bilateral defence relationships established by a series of multi-lateral agreements between the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, Malaysia, and Singapore (all Commonwealth members) signed in 1971, whereby the five powers are to consult each other "immediately" in the event or threat of an armed attack on Malaysia or Singapore for the purpose of deciding what measures should be taken jointly or separately in response On 18 October 2021, FPDA celebrated its 50th anniversary with joint air and naval displays involving the ships and aircraft of the member countries. These were observed by Singaporean Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen and the High Commissioners of Australia, Malaysia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. Prior to this, a two-week joint exercise had taken place, known as Exercise Bersama Gold in honour of the FPDA's golden jubilee. Participating ships included the Australian amphibious assault ship HMAS Canberra and New Zealand's HMNZS Aotearoa replenishment tanker. The British destroyer HMS Diamond also took part in the exercise. Whilst in the region at the time, UK Carrier Strike Group 21 did not participate in the exercise, likely due to the presence of the United States Marine Corps on the aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth. FPDA's Australia, New Zealand, Malaysia, and Singapore are also members of CPTPP. UK is in the advanced stage in joining the CPTPP group. FPDA's nuclear weapons state is the UK.
    1
  8953. 1
  8954. 1
  8955. 1
  8956. 1
  8957. 1
  8958. 1
  8959. 1
  8960. 1
  8961. 1
  8962. 1
  8963. 1
  8964. 1
  8965. 1
  8966. 1
  8967. 1
  8968. 1
  8969. 1
  8970. 1
  8971. 1
  8972. 1
  8973. 1
  8974. 1
  8975. 1
  8976. 1
  8977. 1
  8978. 1
  8979. 1
  8980. 1
  8981. 1
  8982.  @tkw3864  From forbes.com/sites/douglasbulloch/2016/10/12/protectionism-may-be-rising-around-the-world-but-in-china-it-never-went-away/#5dc3f5df73da Protectionism May Be Rising Around The World, But In China It Never Went Away Promises unkept? Since joining the WTO in 2001, China has repeatedly insisted that it will live up to those undertakings made on entry. In particular, the use of currency manipulation has been identified by the US as a breech of the commitment to end price controls for the purposes of protecting domestic industries. This became a major political issue from 2005 onwards, and has only recently subsided because it is assumed that the RMB is slightly overvalued on the market. Nevertheless, for years it was deliberate policy for the PBoC to accumulate US Dollars and suppress the exchange rate for the RMB, resulting in exactly the price distortions China had committed to eliminate in 2001, and fuelling an enormous trade surplus with the US, which persists and expands to this day. Furthermore TRIPS implementation has been given some effect on paper, but has made little progress when it comes to 'enforcement.' This is (according to the WTO) as recently as February 2015, fully 14 years after TRIPS was supposed to be already in effect. The US Trade Representative produces an annual report to Congress on China's WTO compliance which leaves little room to conclude they have so far lived up to their accession commitments. The most recent several-hundred-page document - produced in December 2015 - recites a long list of small measures, committees established, announcements made and new administrative complications faced, all continuing disputes over an agreement theoretically in effect since 2001. Although, therefore, protectionism is rising around the world, it is also true to say that existing practices of protectionism have not fallen in the way that they should have since China's accession to the WTO in 2001. Because of this lack of progress in easing trade, the extended period of currency manipulation, the lack of observance of TRIPS and the sheer administrative resistance exporters face when trying to get their products into China, we now face of world of highly unbalanced trade, and rising mistrust. And it is this that is leading to rising protectionism; the simple fact that it never went away.
    1
  8983. 1
  8984. 1
  8985. 1
  8986. 1
  8987. 1
  8988. 1
  8989. 1
  8990. 1
  8991. 1
  8992. 1
  8993. 1
  8994. 1
  8995. 1
  8996. 1
  8997. 1
  8998. 1
  8999. 1
  9000. 1
  9001. 1
  9002. 1
  9003. 1
  9004. 1
  9005. 1
  9006. 1
  9007. 1
  9008. 1
  9009. 1
  9010. 1
  9011. 1
  9012. 1
  9013. 1
  9014. 1
  9015. 1
  9016. 1
  9017. 1
  9018. 1
  9019. 1
  9020. 1
  9021. 1
  9022. 1
  9023. 1
  9024. 1
  9025. 1
  9026. 1
  9027. 1
  9028. 1
  9029. 1
  9030. 1
  9031. 1
  9032. 1
  9033. 1
  9034. 1
  9035. 1
  9036. 1
  9037. 1
  9038. 1
  9039. 1
  9040. 1
  9041. 1
  9042. 1
  9043. 1
  9044. 1
  9045. 1
  9046. 1
  9047. 1
  9048. 1
  9049. 1
  9050.  @ertugrulbae46  >Russia proposed to the West a plan for a new security system in Europe: both sides were to withdraw troops from the border, to halt ships and aircraft from entering dangerous areas Putin: “Speaking of security guarantees … our actions will not depend upon the negotiations, they will depend on the unconditional compliance with Russian security demands”. The main articles of Russian draft proposed agreement demand included eight articles with the following points: Article 1: the parties should not strengthen their security at the expense of Russia’s security; Article 2: the parties will use multilateral consultations and the NATO-Russia Council to address points of conflict; Article 3: the parties reaffirm that they do not consider each other as adversaries and maintain a dialogue; Article 4: the parties shall not deploy military forces and weaponry on the territory of any of the other states in Europe in addition to any forces that were deployed as of May 27, 1997; Article 5: the parties shall not deploy land-based intermediate- and short-range missiles adjacent to the other parties; Article 6: all member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization commit themselves to refrain from any further enlargement of NATO, including the accession of Ukraine as well as other States; Article 7: the parties that are member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization shall not conduct any military activity on the territory of Ukraine as well as other States in the Eastern Europe, in the South Caucasus and in Central Asia; and Article 8: the agreement shall not be interpreted as affecting the primary responsibility of the Security Council of the United Nations for maintaining international peace and security. ---------------- Fact: many eastern European countries (from the Three Seas Initiative) have major PTSD issues against Russia. Romania's government has condemned Putin's demand to remove Romania's freedom of association. Finland's government has condemned Putin's demand to remove Finland's freedom of association. Estonia's government has condemned Putin's demand to remove Estonia's freedom of association. Latvia's government has condemned Putin's demand to remove Latvia's freedom of association. Lithuania's government has condemned Putin's demand to remove Lithuania's freedom of association. Poland's government has condemned Putin's demand to remove Poland's freedom of association. Bulgaria's government has condemned Putin's demand to remove Bulgaria's freedom of association.
    1
  9051. 1
  9052. 1
  9053. 1
  9054. 1
  9055. 1
  9056. 1
  9057. 1
  9058. 1
  9059. 1
  9060. 1
  9061. 1
  9062. 1
  9063. 1
  9064. 1
  9065. 1
  9066. 1
  9067. 1
  9068. 1
  9069. 1
  9070. 1
  9071. 1
  9072. 1
  9073. 1
  9074. 1
  9075. 1
  9076. 1
  9077. 1
  9078. 1
  9079. 1
  9080. 1
  9081. 1
  9082. 1
  9083. 1
  9084. 1
  9085. 1
  9086. 1
  9087. 1
  9088. 1
  9089. 1
  9090. 1
  9091. 1
  9092. 1
  9093. 1
  9094. 1
  9095. 1
  9096. 1
  9097. 1
  9098. 1
  9099. 1
  9100. 1
  9101. 1
  9102. 1
  9103. 1
  9104. 1
  9105. 1
  9106. 1
  9107. 1
  9108. 1
  9109. 1
  9110. 1
  9111. 1
  9112. 1
  9113. 1
  9114. 1
  9115. 1
  9116. 1
  9117. 1
  9118. 1
  9119. 1
  9120. 1
  9121. 1
  9122. 1
  9123. 1
  9124.  @rongoldman7520  The Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority-governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country".[8] In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical.
    1
  9125. 1
  9126. 1
  9127. 1
  9128. 1
  9129. 1
  9130. 1
  9131. 1
  9132. 1
  9133. 1
  9134. 1
  9135. 1
  9136. 1
  9137. 1
  9138. 1
  9139.  @ahm848  Before Euromaidan, Russia successfully used political and economic leverage to dissuade Ukraine from signing the E.U. deal. In the months prior to the Vilnius summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a trade war with Kyiv, blocking nearly all imports from Ukraine and cutting energy supplies to the country. In turn, this reduced Ukrainian exports by 25 percent and shrank the economy by 1.5 percent. Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17, disallows foreign military bases after 2017. CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on 28 June 1996 Article 17 The location of foreign military bases shall not be permitted on the territory of Ukraine. After 2017, Ukraine's constitution is incompatible with foreign military bases hosting either NATO or CSTO. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17. If Yanukovych hadn't signed the military base rental extension, Russia would have been kicked out of Crimea. Putin's narrative was false when Yanukovych breached the 1996 Ukraine Constitution's Article 17. 1. 1863–1864 January uprising, Russian Empire crushed Polish, Lithuanian, and Ukrainian insurgents uprising. 2. Soviet–Ukrainian War occurred between 1917 to 1921, a war between the Ukrainian People's Republic vs the Bolsheviks i.e. Ukrainian Soviet Republic and Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (modern-day Russian Federation). These "old world" issues existed before the US became a superpower. Regardless of the economic system, the Grand Duchy of Moscow's imperialist behavior remained the same. Being communist doesn't hide the fact the Grand Duchy of Moscow didn't change its nationalist expansion.
    1
  9140. 1
  9141. 1
  9142. 1
  9143. 1
  9144. Your information is old From Randall Howard is Director of Business Development for the integrated F-16/F-21 Fighter Group at Lockheed-Martin https://euro-sd.com/2019/12/news/15626/we-both-will-not-live-to-see-the-last-flight-of-an-f-16/ the USAF is upgrading about 70 of its F-16s with VIPER capabilities, their intent is to eventually upgrade at least 370 - Lockheed-Martin VIPER = F-16V Block 70/72. https://theaviationist.com/2019/12/20/these-images-show-a-texas-angs-f-16c-wearing-a-slightly-modified-have-glass-v-paint-scheme/ the evolution of the standard Have Glass program that saw all the F-16s receiving a two-tone grey color scheme made with a special radar-absorbing paint capable to reduce the aircraft Radar Cross Section. Indeed, all “Vipers” are covered with RAM (Radar Absorbent Material) made of microscopic metal grains that can degrade the radar signature of the aircraft. The Have Glass V is the latest version of the special paint, somehow similart to the one of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter that has been applied to U.S. F-16s since at least 2012 when it started to appear on the F-16CM (formerly CJ) Block 50 Fighting Falcon aircraft https://www.flightglobal.com/fixed-wing/first-air-national-guard-f-16-receives-aesa-radar/136067.article Air National Guard F-16 recently received the fleet’s first active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland The US Air Force (USAF) installed the Northrop Grumman-made AN/APG-83 SABR radar on an undisclosed recent date, says Northrop Grumman on 9 January. The recipient aircraft will be used as part of the service’s effort to declare initial operational capability of the AESA radars on the Air National Guard’s F-16 fleet Air National Guard F-16 with Northrop Grumman AN/APG-83 SABR AESA radar follows F-16V upgrade path. F-16E Block 60/62 has Northrop Grumman's older AN/APG-80 AESA radar.
    1
  9145. 1
  9146. 1
  9147. 1
  9148. 1
  9149. 1
  9150. 1
  9151. 1
  9152. 1
  9153. 1
  9154. 1
  9155. 1
  9156. 1
  9157. 1
  9158. 1
  9159. 1
  9160. 1
  9161. 1
  9162. 1
  9163. 1
  9164. 1
  9165. 1
  9166. 1
  9167. 1
  9168. 1
  9169. 1
  9170. 1
  9171. 1
  9172. 1
  9173. 1
  9174. 1
  9175. 1
  9176. 1
  9177. 1
  9178. 1
  9179. 1
  9180. 1
  9181. 1
  9182. 1
  9183. 1
  9184. 1
  9185. 1
  9186. 1
  9187. 1
  9188. 1
  9189. 1
  9190.  @djorksolo8544  Air Forces Monthly had an article, "The Big Fight", about the Advanced Tactical Leadership Course (ATLC) in its April 2010 issue. The successive article (same issue), "Justifiably Proud!", was an interview with Lt. Col. Fabrice Grandclaudon, Commander of EC 1/7. "AFM: You apparently said 'the Rafale rubbed F-22 - the most modern fighter of the USAF. During six encounters the F-22 hit its goal only once'. The 27th FS doesn't remember the engagements that way and say the F-22 scored several victories against Rafale. Did you offer DACT to the Raptors and did they decline? I did not say we 'rubbed them', I said that there was only one shot claimed (ie a simulated kill) for the six that were set-up. I read in a recent issue of Air et Cosmos that it was two. As far as I am concerned, one or two shots of six Basic Fighter Manoeuvres (BFM) encounters is a victory for the F-22 but not an overwhelming one. Not like the one we claimed against the Typhoons after combat in Solenzara, Corsica during September (9 set-up: 8 to 1 for the Rafale*). The other set-ups versus F-22s were terminated for combat deck, an un-decisive situation or lack of fuel. We never shot them down, but we hope to do so soon since we are quite good opposition for them, and it is in the pilot's spirit not to give up! Like almost every nation, we offered Beyond Visual Range DACT, of course, but the F-22 was only authorized to do BFM 1v1 Within Visual Range (WVR) versus foreign countries (except the UK, with whom they did not fight even in the BFMs). I wish we could have done so, but we didn't - which bring me back to Air et Cosmos, where its information about BVR engagement with AMRAAM in stealth mode is wrong: besides the fact that we did not even fly BVR vs F-22s! F-22 was fitted with some specific device to increase their radar signature. It enabled us to have contact with them during work ups for example. But that's not the point here." ------------- 1. "one or two shots of six Basic Fighter Manoeuvres (BFM) encounters is a victory for the F-22" . 2. "We never shot them down" on another setup. Note that F-22s has to increase it's RCS for the training. In a real combat, F-22A's specific device to increase their radar signature would be turned off and Rafale's pilots would have comparably inferior situation awareness than F-22's pilots since Rafale's pilots wouldn't be aware of F-22A's specific location i.e. it's another F-22's mass (simulated) killing of F-15s type scenario. Without F-22A's RCS booster, Rafale's pilots wouldn't be able to locate the F-22s for training. 3. None of the OSF pictures released by the French Ministry of Defense represented a kill.
    1
  9191.  @djorksolo8544  https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/f-35-overwhelming-superiority-over-rafale-and-eurofighter-in-atlantic-trident.523986/ The F-35A's overwhelming superiority has been recorded in some of the most epic air combat in NATO history when the USAF fighter met for the Atlantic Trident (April 12-18), French Rafale fighters and British Eurofighter Typhoon http://www.opex360.com/2017/04/12/le-rafale-va-pouvoir-se-mesurer-au-f-35a-lors-de-lexercice-atlantic-trident-2017/ "The French, American and British crews will quickly get to the heart of the matter, with a first day of practice dedicated to "Basic Fighting Manœuvers", with oppositions in one against the other. Greek account of extracurricular encounters between the participants is more likely to be true than not. Firstly all the numbers he gave out were very specific and if he was pumping up the F-35 for anti Turkish reasons why say it lost one against the F-15E ? These unofficial dogfights happen all the time which we only get to hear about when participants start leaking info and there is a French report of Atlantic Trident which stated that on the first day the aircraft practiced among themselves before the official exercise began https://sldinfo.com/2017/05/a-french-air-force-perspective-on-atlantic-trident-2017/ A French Air Force Perspective on “Atlantic Trident 2017” “The eyes of the French Air Force was clearly opened with regard to the F-22 and fifth generation, and they themselves have much to contribute with their battle-hardened combat capability and their latest generation aircraft.”
    1
  9192. 1
  9193. 1
  9194. 1
  9195. 1
  9196. 1
  9197. 1
  9198. 1
  9199. 1
  9200. 1
  9201. 1
  9202.  @f65  During WW2, UK delivered the 1st Nazi Germany defeat during the Battle of Britian, hence weakening Germany's airforce fleet. Nazi Germany's large land army is a mismatch against UK's maritime superiority. Both UK and Imperial Japan have about 11 aircraft carriers during WW2, but UK can only handle a single front war e.g. WW1. US Navy was created to overcome Imperial Japan's UK size maritime power. USA production is more than 4 times since the US was the only nation to mass-produced aircraft carriers. Germany Tiger I tank's 1,347 units x 44 tons = 59,268 tons Tiger II tank has 492 units x 68 tons = 33,456 tons Panther tank has 6000 units x 44 tons = 264,000 tons Panzer IV has 8,553 unit x 25 tons = 213,825 tons Total: 570,549 tons Czech's Panzer 38(t) has 1414 units x 10 tons = 141,40 tons USA M26 tanks has 2,212 units x 44 tons = 97,328 tons M26 has 90 mm gun. M4 tanks has 49,234 units x 33 tons = 1,624,722, Russian T34 tanks has similar number. M10 tank destroyer has 6,406 units x 29 tons = 185,774 tons M18 tank destroyer has 2,507 units x 39 tons = 97,773 tons M36 tank destroyer has 2,324 units x 29 tons = 67,396 tons M36 has 90 mm gun. Sub-Total: 2,072,993 tons M4 Sherman Firefly (UK) has 2,200 units x 35 tons = 77,000 tons. M4 Firefly can takes on Tiger I and Panther tanks. The US has both quality (M26) and numbers (M4). A significant amount of the US Army's tonnage was against the German army. The US has the following aircraft carrier production 24 Essex-class fleet carriers with 90 to 110 aircraft each. 650,400 tons for Essex-class. 21 Commencement Bay class with 228,900 tons 50 Casablanca-class with 390,000 tons. 45 Bogue-class with 747,900 tons 3 Yorktown-class fleet carriers with 59,400 tons Sub-Total: 3,798,645 tons Modern-day USN aircraft carrier fleet tonnage is just about 1,460,000 tons. A significant amount of USN's tonnage was against the Japanese navy. WW2 UK has similar aircraft carrier builds as Imperial Japan i.e. around 10 to 11 units. Not including UK, US and Canada other surface combat ships e.g. destroyers, heavy cruisers, battleships and 'etc'. Grand Total: 5,871,638 tons For the US, that's already 10.3X times over Germany's iron/steel tonnage extract/production. WW2 Russian navy is small. WW2 German navy is small. Both Canada and the USA has the advantage of the entire North American continent on raw metal and oil resources. European mainland is raw resource-poor, hence the reason for Hitler wanting Russian lands.
    1
  9203. 1
  9204. 1
  9205. 1
  9206. 1
  9207. 1
  9208. 1
  9209. 1
  9210. 1
  9211. 1
  9212. 1
  9213. 1
  9214. 1
  9215. 1
  9216. 1
  9217. 1
  9218. 1
  9219. 1
  9220. 1
  9221. 1
  9222. 1
  9223. 1
  9224. 1
  9225. 1
  9226. 1
  9227. 1
  9228. 1
  9229. 1
  9230. 1
  9231. 1
  9232. 1
  9233. 1
  9234. 1
  9235. 1
  9236. 1
  9237. 1
  9238. 1
  9239. 1
  9240. 1
  9241. 1
  9242. 1
  9243. 1
  9244. 1
  9245. 1
  9246. 1
  9247. 1
  9248. 1
  9249.  @TjJay-ev6mx  Depopulation of local Jewish communities Following the 1948 Arab–Israeli War and the 1949 Armistice Agreements, all Jewish communities in Transjordan, the Jordanian-annexed West Bank, and the Egyptian-occupied Gaza Strip were depopulated.[201][202] The communities and localities affected included the Jerusalem Jewish Quarter, Hebron, Ein Tzurim, Masu'ot Yitzhak, Revadim, Beit HaArava, Kalya, Kfar Etzion, Atarot, Kfar Darom, Neve Yaakov, and Tel Or[203][204] In many cases, these depopulations represented final stages of earlier evacuations begun in response to both the 1929 Palestine riots and 1936-1939 Arab Revolt.[205] The Hebron Jewish Community, already having lost a majority of its population as a result of mandatory British evacuation following the 1929 Hebron Massacre, lost its sole remaining Jewish resident Ya’akov Ben Shalom Ezra during the war.[206][207] Kfar Darom, the last of the Gaza Jewish communities following mandatory evacuations in 1929, was itself ultimately abandoned following a three-month siege by the Egyptian army in 1948.[208] In the case of Dead Sea-region kibbutzim of Beit HaArava and Kalya, negotiations with Transjordan's King Abdullah were conducted in an attempt for residents to remain. When those talks failed, the villagers fled by boat to an Israeli military post at Mount Sodom.[209] Judean settlements Kfar Etzion, a kibbutz established southwest of Bethlehem, and Jerusalem adjascent Atarot and Neve Yaakov fared less peacefully during the conflict. All three villages were besieged by a combined force of Arab Legion and local irregulars, resulting in a complete evacuation of Atarot & Neve Yaakov, and a massacre of 127 of Etzion's defending force and citizens.[210] The village of Tel Or had the distinction of being the only Jewish locality permitted in Transjordan proper at the time. Established in 1930 in the vicinity of the Naharayim hydroelectric power plant, the village of was built as a housing compound for Jewish crews operating the power plant, and their families.[211] Following a prolonged battle between Yishuv forces and the Transjordanian Arab Legion in the area, the residents of Tel Or were given an ultimatum to surrender or leave the village. Depopulation of Jerusalem's Jewish Quarter The largest depopulation during the war occurred in Jerusalem's Jewish Quarter, where its entire population of about 2,000 Jews were besieged and ultimately forced to leave en masse. The defenders surrendered on 28 May 1948. Weingarten negotiating the surrender with Arab Legion soldiers The Jordanian commander is reported to have told his superiors: "For the first time in 1,000 years not a single Jew remains in the Jewish Quarter. Not a single building remains intact. This makes the Jews' return here impossible."[212][213] ------------- Afghanistan See also: History of the Jews in Afghanistan The Afghan Jewish community declined from about 40,000 in the early 20th century to 5,000 by 1934 due to persecution. Many Afghan Jews fled to Persia, although some came to Palestine.[239] In 1929, the Soviet press reported a pogrom in Afghanistan.[240] -------------
    1
  9250. >provoke china multiple times Note that China has a "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" which is known as CCP's protectionist list. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited. ------ Try again, hypocrite.
    1
  9251. 1
  9252. 1
  9253. 1
  9254. 1
  9255. 1
  9256. 1
  9257. 1
  9258. 1
  9259. 1
  9260. 1
  9261.  @atomduke7789  Your assumptions are wrong. Australia's place in any conflict between the US and China is enforcing Australia's freedom of navigation and keeping its shipping lanes open to support its northern allies. Refer to Australia-Japan "Defence Supplies and Services" agreement. Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of Japan concerning Reciprocal Provision of Supplies and Services between the Australian Defence Force and the Self-Defense Forces of Japan - Sydney, 14 January 2017 Obligations 3.14 The provision of any supplies and services under the proposed Agreement must be carried out in accordance with the Parties’ respective national laws and obligations. 3.15 Article I provides that the reciprocal provision of logistic supplies and services under the proposed Agreement will occur for the purposes of: exercises and training with participation by both the ADF and the JSDF; United Nations peacekeeping operations, internationally coordinated peacekeeping and security operations, and humanitarian international relief operations; operations in response to large scale disasters in Australia, Japan or a third country; emergency evacuation of Australian or Japanese nationals, or others from third countries; communication and coordination or other routine activities including visits of ships or aircraft of the ADF or the JSDF;and for other cooperative efforts as mutually determined and permitted under the laws and regulations of the respective Parties (including for unforeseen circumstances or exigencies). 3.16 The inclusion of ‘internationally coordinated peacekeeping and security operations’ as well as enabling the provision of logistic supplies and services for other cooperatively efforts as mutually determined is an expansion of the 2013 Agreement. 3.17 The supplies and services that may be provided under the Agreement are listed in Tabled 3.1 below. 3.18 For the provision of supplies, where possible, the receiving Party must return the supplies in a condition and manner satisfactory to the providing Party. Where supplies cannot be returned in a satisfactory condition or are consumable, the receiving Party must give the providing Party supplies of the same type, quality and quantity. Where neither option is possible, the receiving Party must reimburse the providing Party. 3.19 For the provision of services, the receiving Party may either reimburse the providing Party or provide services of the same type and equivalent value. 3.20 The provision of supplies and services must be carried out in accordance with the Procedural Arrangement as agreed between the Australian Department of Defence and the Japanese Ministry of Defence (Article V). The NIA explains that a new Procedural Arrangement has been concluded however is a less-than-treaty status document. Consequently, the Committee will not have an opportunity to review this supporting document. 3.21 Similarly, disputes between the Australia and Japan must be settled in accordance with the Procedural Arrangement, or otherwise through consultation.24 Reasons for implementing proposed treaty action 3.22 As noted above, the proposal to replace the 2013 Agreement was initiated by Japan, which sought to broaden that Agreement to achieve congruence with defence reforms passed by the National Diet in September 2015. 3.23 The NIA states that the expanded scope of the proposed Agreement: aligns with Australia’s other military logistic support agreements and arrangements and offers Australia the opportunity to further enhance the quality of, and potential for, defence cooperation with Japan, and to broaden the interoperability between the two forces. 3.24 It further asserts that the proposed Agreement is ‘uncontroversial’ and ‘builds on Australia’s existing relationship with Japan in relation to defence matters, and raises no international defence policy issues’. 3.25 If the proposed Agreement were not ratified, Australia’s military logistic relationship with Japan would be out of step with those that Japan has with the United States and the United Kingdom. -------------------------------- 1. It's well known China has attempted to encircle Australia via the second Island chain. China has no business in Australia's Oceania backyard. 2. It's well known China's navy ships has surveyed the East Philippines Sea that is a backup route when South China China / West Philippines Sea is blocked by China.
    1
  9262. 1
  9263. 1
  9264. 1
  9265. 1
  9266. 1
  9267. 1
  9268. 1
  9269. 1
  9270. 1
  9271. 1
  9272. 1
  9273. 1
  9274. 1
  9275. 1
  9276. 1
  9277. 1
  9278. 1
  9279. 1
  9280. 1
  9281.  @ilhanosman4653  Twenty Iraqi Kurds have taken legal action to expose French firms who supplied poison gas to Saddam Hussein in 1988. The plaintiffs were among the victims of a chemical weapon attack that killed 5,000 in the town of Halabja during the Iran-Iraq war. A Dutch businessman who sold Iraq chemicals used in the attack was ordered to pay 400,000 euros to some of the victims in April 2013. ----------- Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq ----------- Fuckoff
    1
  9282. 1
  9283. 1
  9284. 1
  9285. 1
  9286. 1
  9287. 1
  9288. 1
  9289. 1
  9290. 1
  9291. 1
  9292. 1
  9293. 1
  9294. 1
  9295. 1
  9296. 1
  9297. 1
  9298. 1
  9299. 1
  9300. 1
  9301. 1
  9302. 1
  9303. 1
  9304. 1
  9305. 1
  9306. 1
  9307. 1
  9308. 1
  9309. 1
  9310. 1
  9311. 1
  9312. 1
  9313. 1
  9314. 1
  9315.  @deniscicic8074  Date: Jan. 7, 2010 Yanukovych: Ukraine will remain a neutral state. "It’s certain that Ukraine was and will be non-aligned state… We strive neither to join NATO nor the [CIS]CSTO [Collective Security Treaty Organization]. We’ll maintain a neutral status," Yanukovych said in an interview with the Komsomolskaya Pravda in Ukraine newspaper. -------- The trigger for Euromaidan was Yanukovych initiated non-neutrality policies such as joining a trade block instead of executing Switzerland-style neutrality. UK leaving the EU and joining CPTPP proves freedom of association. Before Euromaidan, Russia, however, has successfully used political and economic leverage to dissuade Ukraine from signing the E.U. deal. In the months prior to the Vilnius summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a trade war with Kiev, blocking nearly all imports from Ukraine and cutting energy supplies to the country. In turn, this reduced Ukrainian exports by 25 percent and shrank the economy by 1.5 percent. Some trade background for the context From Tradebarrier Index (lower score = less trade barriers) New Zealand's tariff score is 2.92 Australia's tariff score is 3.03 UK's tariff score is 3.94 (after Brexit) Japan's tariff score is 4.05 US's tariff score is 4.54 Germany's tariff score is 4.88 EU's tariff score is 4.88 Russia's tariff score is 6.16 <-------- China's tariff score is 6.8 <------ Russia wants to maintain its higher trade protectionist policies. Your argument is BS.
    1
  9316. 1
  9317. 1
  9318. 1
  9319. 1
  9320. 1
  9321. 1
  9322. 1
  9323. 1
  9324. 1
  9325. 1
  9326. 1
  9327. 1
  9328. 1
  9329. 1
  9330. 1
  9331. 1
  9332. 1
  9333. 1
  9334. 1
  9335. 1
  9336. 1
  9337. 1
  9338. 1
  9339. 1
  9340. 1
  9341. 1
  9342. 1
  9343. 1
  9344. 1
  9345. 1
  9346. 1
  9347. 1
  9348. 1
  9349. 1
  9350. 1
  9351. 1
  9352. 1
  9353. 1
  9354. 1
  9355. 1
  9356. 1
  9357. 1
  9358. 1
  9359. 1
  9360. 1
  9361. 1
  9362. 1
  9363. 1
  9364. 1
  9365. 1
  9366. 1
  9367. 1
  9368. 1
  9369. 1
  9370. 1
  9371. 1
  9372. 1
  9373. 1
  9374. 1
  9375. 1
  9376. 1
  9377. 1
  9378. 1
  9379. 1
  9380. 1
  9381. 1
  9382. 1
  9383. 1
  9384. 1
  9385. 1
  9386. 1
  9387. 1
  9388. 1
  9389. 1
  9390. 1
  9391. 1
  9392. 1
  9393. 1
  9394. 1
  9395. 1
  9396. 1
  9397. 1
  9398. 1
  9399. 1
  9400. 1
  9401. 1
  9402. 1
  9403. 1
  9404. 1
  9405.  @Polleej  https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp0809/09rp36 Quarantine power Section 51(ix) of the Constitution provides that the Commonwealth can pass laws for the peace, order and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to quarantine. The quarantine power has primarily been relied upon in the area of public health.[94] Public health ranges from the regulation of disease prevention to the regulation of tobacco and alcohol.[95] The scope of this power remains uncertain.[96] However, the legislative definition of quarantine includes: the examination, exclusion, detention, observation, segregation, isolation, protection, treatment and regulation of vessels, installations, human beings, animals, plants or other goods or things; or the seizure and destruction of animals, plants, or other goods or things; or the destruction of premises comprising buildings or other structures when treatment of these premises is not practicable; and having as their object the prevention or control of the introduction, establishment or spread of diseases or pests that will or could cause significant damage to human beings, animals, plants, other aspects of the environment or economic activities.[97] While it is conceivable that the quarantine power may support particular aspects of the Commonwealth taking over the administration of public hospitals, such as infection control and therapeutic medicines in Scenario 3, it would be necessary to also rely on other heads of power.[98]
    1
  9406. 1
  9407. 1
  9408. 1
  9409. 1
  9410. 1
  9411. 1
  9412. 1
  9413. 1
  9414. 1
  9415. 1
  9416. 1
  9417. 1
  9418. 1
  9419. 1
  9420. 1
  9421. 1
  9422. 1
  9423. 1
  9424. 1
  9425. 1
  9426. 1
  9427. 1
  9428. 1
  9429. 1
  9430. 1
  9431. 1
  9432. 1
  9433. 1
  9434. 1
  9435. 1
  9436. 1
  9437. 1
  9438. 1
  9439. 1
  9440. 1
  9441. 1
  9442. 1
  9443. 1
  9444. 1
  9445. 1
  9446. 1
  9447. 1
  9448. 1
  9449. 1
  9450. 1
  9451. 1
  9452. 1
  9453. 1
  9454. 1
  9455. 1
  9456. 1
  9457. 1
  9458. 1
  9459. 1
  9460. 1
  9461. 1
  9462. 1
  9463. 1
  9464. 1
  9465. 1
  9466. 1
  9467. 1
  9468. 1
  9469. 1
  9470. 1
  9471. 1
  9472. 1
  9473. 1
  9474. 1
  9475. 1
  9476. 1
  9477. 1
  9478. 1
  9479. 1
  9480. 1
  9481. 1
  9482. 1
  9483. 1
  9484. 1
  9485. 1
  9486. 1
  9487. 1
  9488. 1
  9489. 1
  9490. 1
  9491. 1
  9492. 1
  9493. 1
  9494. 1
  9495. 1
  9496. 1
  9497. 1
  9498. 1
  9499. 1
  9500. 1
  9501. 1
  9502. 1
  9503. 1
  9504. 1
  9505. 1
  9506. 1
  9507. 1
  9508. 1
  9509. 1
  9510. 1
  9511. 1
  9512. 1
  9513. 1
  9514. 1
  9515. 1
  9516. 1
  9517. 1
  9518. 1
  9519.  @ianwilkinson5069  The list for 140 congress members who wanted the US tariff on China to be lowered. Ron Kind Member of Congress Darin LaHood Member of Congress Suzan DelBene Member of Congress Jackie Walorski Member of Congress SANFORD D. BISHOP, JR. Member of Congress GUS M. BILIRAKIS Member of Congress DAVID SCHWEIKERT Member of Congress GUY RESCHENTHALER Member of Congress A. DREW FERGUSON, IV Member of Congress BILL JOHNSON Member of Congress JIM HIMES Member of Congress DONALD S. BEYER JR. Member of Congress BRIAN FITZPATRICK Member of Congress RALPH NORMAN Member of Congress EARL L. “BUDDY” CARTER Member of Congress BETTY MCCOLLUM Member of Congress ADRIAN SMITH Member of Congress EMANUEL CLEAVER Member of Congress GLENN GROTHMAN Member of Congress CHRIS PAPPAS Member of Congress AUSTIN SCOTT Member of Congress JAMES P. MCGOVERN Member of Congress STEVE WOMACK Member of Congress GWEN MOORE Member of Congress BRAD R. WENSTRUP, D.P.M. Member of Congress TERRI A. SEWELL Member of Congress CAROL D. MILLER Member of Congress DAVID SCOTT Member of Congress RICHARD HUDSON Member of Congress SUSAN WILD Member of Congress DEAN PHILLIPS Member of Congress RANDY FEENSTRA Member of Congress JOHN H. RUTHERFORD Member of Congress RICK LARSEN Member of Congress BRYAN STEIL Member of Congress H. MORGAN GRIFFITH Member of Congress DAVID G. VALADAO Member of Congress JOE NEGUSE Member of Congress KELLY ARMSTRONG Member of Congress ANGIE CRAIG Member of Congress JULIA BROWNLEY Member of Congress LINDA T. SÁNCHEZ Member of Congress BARRY LOUDERMILK Member of Congress RON ESTES Member of Congress JIMMY PANETTA Member of Congress KIM SCHRIER, M.D. Member of Congress ANDREW R. GARBARINO Member of Congress TIM WALBERG Member of Congress STEPHANIE MURPHY Member of Congress DINA TITUS Member of Congress MARK AMODEI Member of Congress DAVID N. CICILLINE Member of Congress SCOTT H. PETERS Member of Congress JOHN ROSE Member of Congress HALEY STEVENS Member of Congress SHARICE L. DAVIDS Member of Congress BILLY LONG Member of Congress RICK W. ALLEN Member of Congress JODEY C. ARRINGTON Member of Congress LUCY MCBATH Member of Congress TROY BALDERSON Member of Congress KEVIN HERN Member of Congress MARILYN STRICKLAND Member of Congress LLOYD SMUCKER Member of Congress TOM RICE Member of Congress COLIN ALLRED Member of Congress JAMES COMER Member of Congress ALAN LOWENTHAL Member of Congress PAT FALLON Member of Congress G. K. BUTTERFIELD Member of Congress TIM BURCHETT Member of Congress BRADLEY S. SCHNEIDER Member of Congress ANTHONY GONZALEZ Member of Congress BURGESS OWENS Member of Congress DEBBIE DINGELL Member of Congress BEN CLINE Member of Congress GLENN “GT” THOMPSON Member of Congress TOM EMMER Member of Congress FRED KELLER Member of Congress CHARLIE CRIST Member of Congress SETH MOULTON Member of Congress YOUNG KIM Member of Congress STEVEN HORSFORD Member of Congress TOM REED Member of Congress DANNY K. DAVIS Member of Congress KEVIN MCCARTHY House Republican Leader CATHY MCMORRIS RODGERS Member of Congress DEREK KILMER Member of Congress ANNA G. ESHOO Member of Congress MICHELLE STEEL Member of Congress C.A. DUTCH RUPPERSBERGER Member of Congress DAVID E. PRICE Member of Congress DAVID P. JOYCE Member of Congress SUZANNE BONAMICI Member of Congress JACKIE SPEIER Member of Congress JASON SMITH Member of Congress NICOLE MALLIOTAKIS Member of Congress MIKE KELLY Member of Congress JEFF DUNCAN Member of Congress CINDY AXNE Member of Congress MARIANNETTE MILLER-MEEKS, M.D. Member of Congress THOMAS R. SUOZZI Member of Congress SCOTT DESJARLAIS, M.D. Member of Congress TOM COLE Member of Congress DAN KILDEE Member of Congress WARREN DAVIDSON Member of Congress ANN WAGNER Member of Congress WILLIAM R. TIMMONS IV Member of Congress BRIAN BABIN, D.D.S. Member of Congress DAVID KUSTOFF Member of Congress RONNY L. JACKSON Member of Congress MICHELLE FISCHBACH Member of Congress HENRY CUELLAR Member of Congress CHELLIE PINGREE Member of Congress DAN NEWHOUSE Member of Congress ANDREW S. CLYDE Member of Congress BRETT GUTHRIE Member of Congress CHRISSY HOULAHAN Member of Congress JACK BERGMAN Member of Congress STACEY E. PLASKETT Member of Congress JODY HICE Member of Congress JIM COOPER Member of Congress ROBIN L. KELLY Member of Congress STEVE COHEN Member of Congress CAROLYN BOURDEAUX Member of Congress LIZZIE FLETCHER Member of Congress STEVE CHABOT Member of Congress DUSTY JOHNSON Member of Congress VIRGINIA FOXX Member of Congress DAVID ROUZER Member of Congress PETE AGUILAR Member of Congress DOUG LAMALFA Member of Congress SUSIE LEE Member of Congress MIKE THOMPSON Member of Congress JIM COSTA Member of Congress MIKE SIMPSON Member of Congress HENRY C. “HANK” JOHNSON, JR. Member of Congress KEVIN BRADY Member of Congress VERN BUCHANAN Member of Congress GREG PENCE Member of Congress KEN BUCK Member of Congress
    1
  9520. 1
  9521. 1
  9522. 1
  9523. 1
  9524. 1
  9525. 1
  9526. 1
  9527.  @garawa1987  News(from ABC NET AU) : Ancient virus lurking in remote Australia, affecting thousands of Aboriginal adults In a brightly lit lab in the outback town of Alice Springs, researchers have been inspecting vials of blood infected with an ancient virus that has lurked in Australia for thousands of years. It is called T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1— or HTLV-1 — and Australia has the highest levels in the world. A distant relative of HIV, it is a blood-borne virus that can be sexually transmitted or passed from mother to child. The virus can lead to inflammation of the skin, eyes and lungs. "You're also at risk of developing things like leukemia, so blood cancer, and becoming disabled through spinal cord injuries," researcher Joel Liddle said. "Once your pro-viral load is high, you're at a high risk of poor health." Researchers said, in most cases, leukaemia caused by the virus could be "rapidly fatal". Researchers from the Baker Institute for Heart and Diabetes in Alice Springs estimated 45 percent of Indigenous adults in central Australia had HTLV-1 . "In remote Australia, it's so out of sight, out of mind with a lot of things, health is just one of those things," Mr Liddle said. One of the difficulties with this virus is that most of those who have HTLV-1, don't know they have it, and a vast number of Aboriginal communities have never been tested. "I think there's probably confusion and a little bit of anger, too. People [question] why haven't they been told about this," Mr Liddle said. "There's a lot of reasons to breastfeed. Prolonged breastfeeding may be something that could be addressed but that's up to Aboriginal people to decide." For Mr Liddle, an Arrernte man, a response to high rates of HTLV-1 demands a delicate approach, with intensive education work delivered in Aboriginal languages. "I think there's a lot of work to do, certainly I think at the moment, what I see as our main thing is to engage sensitively around the issues because we're dealing with people's health, and all the things and complexities that are going on in remote communities, so we have to be really mindful of that." ------ This ancient virus is related to HIV( i.e. HTLV-1) and reduces an adult's life span. To fix this issue, non-Aboriginal R&D will be needed to cure this ancient issue, promote safe sex culture (i.e. change culture), and practise monogamy (i.e. change culture).
    1
  9528. The Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". --------------- In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical. USSR's proxy attempted to remove Chile's check-and-balance Congress system. USSR's proxy attempted to concentrate political power into a single entity (individual and political party). The US has no problems with the Swedish-style nanny market led-socialism that is practiced in the CANZUK and Nordic groups.
    1
  9529. 1
  9530. 1
  9531. 1
  9532. 1
  9533. 1
  9534. 1
  9535. 1
  9536. 1
  9537. 1
  9538. 1
  9539. 1
  9540. 1
  9541. 1
  9542. 1
  9543. 1
  9544. 1
  9545. 1
  9546. 1
  9547. 1
  9548. 1
  9549. 1
  9550. 1
  9551. 1
  9552. 1
  9553. 1
  9554. 1
  9555. 1
  9556. 1
  9557. 1
  9558. 1
  9559. 1
  9560. 1
  9561. 1
  9562. 1
  9563. 1
  9564. 1
  9565. 1
  9566. 1
  9567. 1
  9568. 1
  9569. 1
  9570. 1
  9571. 1
  9572. 1
  9573. 1
  9574. 1
  9575. 1
  9576. 1
  9577. 1
  9578. 1
  9579. 1
  9580. 1
  9581. 1
  9582. 1
  9583. 1
  9584. 1
  9585. 1
  9586. 1
  9587. 1
  9588. 1
  9589. 1
  9590. 1
  9591. 1
  9592. 1
  9593. 1
  9594. 1
  9595. 1
  9596. 1
  9597. 1
  9598. 1
  9599. 1
  9600. 1
  9601. 1
  9602. 1
  9603. 1
  9604. 1
  9605. 1
  9606. 1
  9607. 1
  9608. 1
  9609. 1
  9610. 1
  9611. 1
  9612. 1
  9613. 1
  9614. 1
  9615. 1
  9616. 1
  9617. 1
  9618. 1
  9619. 1
  9620. 1
  9621. 1
  9622. 1
  9623. 1
  9624. 1
  9625. 1
  9626. 1
  9627. 1
  9628. 1
  9629. 1
  9630. 1
  9631. 1
  9632. 1
  9633. 1
  9634. 1
  9635. 1
  9636. 1
  9637. 1
  9638. 1
  9639. 1
  9640. 1
  9641. 1
  9642. 1
  9643. 1
  9644.  @arsmoriendi7037  >UK has literally wiped out a whole continent and they remain as a race Facts: 1. British government's remaining legislative powers were removed from Australia with Australia Act 1986. Similar legislation was applied to Canada Act 1982; Constitution Act, 1982, and New Zealand Constitution Act 1986. Australia, Canada, and New Zealand exited the Sterling area sometime after WW2. Most members of the Sterling area have exited and pegged their currencies with the United States Dollar. A period after 1973 saw a further decline in the special trade links the Commonwealth nations had with the United Kingdom and ended their privileged access to UK markets. UK's preferential trade condition with CPTPP's members was accidentally established when Trump's USA exited TPP and created CPTPP. UK joins CPTPP. LOL ----- 2. From ABC NET AU : Ancient virus lurking in remote Australia, affecting thousands of Aboriginal adults In a brightly lit lab in the outback town of Alice Springs, researchers have been inspecting vials of blood infected with an ancient virus that has lurked in Australia for thousands of years. It is called T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1— or HTLV-1 — and Australia has the highest levels in the world. A distant relative of HIV, it is a blood-borne virus that can be sexually transmitted or passed from mother to child. The virus can lead to inflammation of the skin, eyes and lungs. "You're also at risk of developing things like leukemia, so blood cancer, and becoming disabled through spinal cord injuries," researcher Joel Liddle said. "Once your pro-viral load is high, you're at a high risk of poor health." Researchers said, in most cases, leukaemia caused by the virus could be "rapidly fatal". Researchers from the Baker Institute for Heart and Diabetes in Alice Springs estimated 45 percent of Indigenous adults in central Australia had HTLV-1 . "In remote Australia, it's so out of sight, out of mind with a lot of things, health is just one of those things," Mr Liddle said. One of the difficulties with this virus is that most of those who have HTLV-1, don't know they have it, and a vast number of Aboriginal communities have never been tested. "I think there's probably confusion and a little bit of anger, too. People [question] why haven't they been told about this," Mr Liddle said. "There's a lot of reasons to breastfeed. Prolonged breastfeeding may be something that could be addressed but that's up to Aboriginal people to decide." For Mr Liddle, an Arrernte man, a response to high rates of HTLV-1 demands a delicate approach, with intensive education work delivered in Aboriginal languages. "I think there's a lot of work to do, certainly I think at the moment, what I see as our main thing is to engage sensitively around the issues because we're dealing with people's health, and all the things and complexities that are going on in remote communities, so we have to be really mindful of that." ------ This ancient virus is related to HIV( i.e. HTLV-1) and reduces an adult's life span.
    1
  9645. 1
  9646.  @jeanclaudejunior  The Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority-governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". --------------- USSR's proxy attempted to remove Chile's check-and-balance Congress system. USSR's proxy attempted to concentrate political power into a single entity (individual and political party).
    1
  9647. 1
  9648. 1
  9649. 1
  9650. 1
  9651. 1
  9652. 1
  9653. 1
  9654. 1
  9655. 1
  9656. 1
  9657. 1
  9658. 1
  9659. 1
  9660. 1
  9661. 1
  9662. 1
  9663. 1
  9664. 1
  9665. 1
  9666. 1
  9667. 1
  9668. 1
  9669. 1
  9670. 1
  9671. 1
  9672. 1
  9673. 1
  9674. 1
  9675. 1
  9676. 1
  9677. 1
  9678. 1
  9679. 1
  9680. 1
  9681. 1
  9682. 1
  9683. 1
  9684. 1
  9685. 1
  9686. 1
  9687. 1
  9688. 1
  9689. 1
  9690. 1
  9691. 1
  9692. 1
  9693. 1
  9694. 1
  9695. 1
  9696. 1
  9697. 1
  9698. 1
  9699. 1
  9700. 1
  9701. 1
  9702.  @tarunkundu9941  >Russia meets EU's 70%demands of Natural gas... FALSE. ----- The United States remained Europe’s top supplier of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the first 3 months of 2021 as it continued to gain market share at the expense of Russia and Qatar, Europe’s second- and third-largest sources of LNG, according to the EU Commission’s latest European Gas Market Report. The US supplied 24% (4.2 Bcm) of the EU’s overall LNG imports (17 Bcm in Q1 2021); Russia placed second at 21% (3.7 Bcm); and Qatar was third at 18% (3.1 Bcm), the EU Commission reported in early July. When compared to Q4 2020, the US picked up 2% market share from January to March this year, while Russia bested Qatar to become Europe’s second-largest LNG supplier. Nigeria placed fourth, followed by Algeria and Trinidad and Tobago. A review of EU Commission reports dating back to 2019 reveals a steady quarter-to-quarter decline in Europe’s LNG purchases while it also documents the growing rivalry between the US and Russia, Qatar’s fall from dominance, and the emergence of the US as Europe’s top LNG supplier starting Q4 2019. The EU is the world’s third-largest LNG market, though its imports amounted to only about half that of Japan (36 Bcm) and China (32 Bcm) in Q1 2021. European gas consumption rose 7.6% to 132 Bcm in Q1 based on a year-on-year comparison. The commission noted that demand for gas as fuel to generate electricity rose 3.4%, also year-on-year (increasing by 4.9 TWh.) In terms of gas deliveries overall, including pipeline gas, Russia remained the leading gas supplier to Europe (45% of all imports) with the Nord Stream 1 pipeline across the Baltic Sea as its most important supply route. ----- Green policies have caused higher demand for gas.
    1
  9703. 1
  9704. 1
  9705. 1
  9706. 1
  9707. 1
  9708. 1
  9709.  @Frenkac809  >USA goes around the world destroying countries and overthrowing governments. 1. Iraq invaded Kuwait. 2. Sheikhdom of Kuwait Kuwait was founded in 1613 AD as a fishing village known as Grane (Kureyn). The region soon came under the rule of the Bani Khalid Emirate in 1670 after the expulsion of the Ottomans from Eastern Arabia (Lahsa Eyalet) by Barrack bin Ghurayr, Emir of the Bani Khalid, who successfully besieged the Ottoman governor Umar Pasha who surrendered and gave up his rule as the fourth Ottoman governor of al-Hasa. In 1752, Kuwait became independent after an agreement between the Sheikh of Kuwait and the Emir of Bani Khalid in which Bani Khalid recognised Sabah I bin Jaber's independent rule over Kuwait and in exchange Kuwait would not ally itself or support the enemies of Bani Khalid or interfere in the internal affairs of Bani Khalid in any way. 3. Report: Saudi Arabia Presses U.S. on Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Date: January 19, 1992 <----- From AP NEWS NEW YORK (AP) _ Saudi Arabia is pressuring the Bush administration to secretly arm and give intelligence to Iraqi opposition forces so they can work to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a newspaper reported Sunday. The Saudis want the United States to give arms and intelligence to Kurdish rebels in north Iraq, Shiite Muslim fighters in the south and Sunni Muslim opposition forces in central Iraq, the Times said, quoting U.S. and allied officials it didn’t name. ----- 4. Unlike Russia, the US didn't assimilate Yugoslavia's breakaway countries into the US federal structure.
    1
  9710. 1
  9711. 1
  9712. 1
  9713. 1
  9714. 1
  9715. 1
  9716. 1
  9717. 1
  9718. 1
  9719. 1
  9720. 1
  9721. 1
  9722. 1
  9723. 1
  9724. 1
  9725. 1
  9726. 1
  9727. 1
  9728. 1
  9729. 1
  9730. 1
  9731. 1
  9732. 1
  9733. 1
  9734. 1
  9735. 1
  9736. 1
  9737. 1
  9738. 1
  9739. 1
  9740. 1
  9741. 1
  9742. 1
  9743. 1
  9744. 1
  9745. 1
  9746. 1
  9747. 1
  9748. 1
  9749. 1
  9750. 1
  9751. 1
  9752. 1
  9753. 1
  9754. 1
  9755. 1
  9756. 1
  9757. 1
  9758.  @WarblesOnALot  https://www.quora.com/Why-does-the-US-Air-Forces-F-35-stealth-fighter-have-heat-issues-when-flying-supersonic-and-whats-overheating With the completion of developmental flight testing, the F-35 no longer has any heat issues when flying within its design flight envelope (with a top speed of Mach 1.6). In the past however there were 2 sets of speed restrictions: In the FY2015 Director of Operational Test & Evaluation (DOT&E) report for the F-35, it was noted that the program had an airspeed restriction in place where F-35s were not permitted to fly at speeds equal or greater than 500kts below 5,000ft, 550kts between 5,000–15,000ft and 600 knots between 15,000–25,000ft, for more than 10 minutes at a time without opening the weapon bay doors to vent the air inside them. Above 25,000ft there were no restrictions (aside from the Mach 1.6 top speed). The reason that this restriction was put in place was because an electronics system that was moved into a weapons bay for easier maintenance access had not been tested and fully certified to last an acceptably long life in high temperatures. When the F-35’s engine is producing high levels of thrust, it produces a significant amount of heat which is transmitted into the weapon bays. This can result in the weapon bays reaching temperatures of over 80C / 176F, so if a circuit board was only previously tested to 85C / 185F, it would require re-verification. Since that report’s release years ago, those flight restrictions have been removed. When the F-35’s afterburner was used for extended periods of time it would cause heat damage to the inner surfaces and coatings of the horizontal stabilisers (which extend out behind the jet, either side of the exhaust plume. This problem was particularly an issue for the F-35B and F-35C variants which accelerate slower and therefore need more time using afterburner to reach speeds such as Mach 1.6. In the first half of 2018 however, all 3 variants of the F-35 were certified to fly their full flight envelope, and the latest DOT&E report has no mention of this issue remaining, or of afterburner usage restrictions being imposed. As for the F-35’s Mach 1.6 speed limit, this is purely a placard limit, where the manufacturer was only contracted to develop a Mach 1.6 capable fighter and no funding or requirement has been made to test whether the jet can exceed Mach 1.6 by a non-trivial amount. Diagrams of the F-35’s flight envelope suggest that all 3 variants can fly faster than Mach 1.6, with the F-35A’s diagram appearing to suggest a top speed of around Mach 1.8 or higher, but this is speculation, and Lockheed cannot guarantee the jet will continue to be safe to operate to (eg) Mach 1.8 without studies and flight testing. In any case, top speeds are not very relevant to real world combat (due to how quickly jets will drain their already partially-depleted fuel tanks trying to reach them) and there could be thermal issues (either with even hotter weapon bays, or additional horizontal tail heating, or with aerodynamic heating causing issues for the jet’s stealth coatings).
    1
  9759. 1
  9760. 1
  9761. 1
  9762. 1
  9763. 1
  9764. 1
  9765. 1
  9766. 1
  9767. 1
  9768. 1
  9769.  @raptordriver7340  From RAAF's F-22A vs F-15D with Digital Radio Frequency Memory (DRFM) experience “…the ability to actually have that data fusion that the aeroplane has makes an incredible difference to how you perform in combat. I saw it first hand on a Red Flag mission in an F15D against a series of fifth-generation F22s. We were actually in the red air. In five engagements we never knew who had hit us and we never even saw the other aeroplane…. After that particular mission I went back and had a look at the tapes on the F22, and the difference in the situational awareness in our two cockpits was just so fundamentally different. That is the key to fifth-generation. That is where I have trouble with the APA analysis…. To me that is key: it is not only stealth; it is the combination of the EOS and the radar to be able to build a comprehensive picture. In that engagement I talked about at Nellis, in Red Flag, the ability to be in a cockpit with a God’s-eye view of what is going on in the world was such an advantage over a fourth-generation fighter – and arguably one of the best fourth-generation fighters in existence, the F15. But even with a DRFM jamming pipe, we still had no chance in those particular engagements. And at no time did any of the performance characteristics that you are talking about have any relevance to those five engagements.” ------------ Both F-35 and F-22 have a passive stereo radar that can locate, track and target EM emission source i.e. F-15 is painting target me with its jammer. F-15EX does NOT replace F-22A or NGAD.
    1
  9770. 1
  9771. 1
  9772. 1
  9773. 1
  9774. 1
  9775. 1
  9776. 1
  9777. 1
  9778. 1
  9779. 1
  9780. 1
  9781. 1
  9782. 1
  9783. 1
  9784. 1
  9785.  @elnazgog4515  >Yugoslavia 9 February 1994: At UN request, NATO agreed to authorise air strikes, declared 20 km total exclusion zone around Sarajevo and required Bosnian Serbs to withdraw heavy weapons from zone or place them under UN control within 10 days; also called on Bosnian Government to place heavy weapons in Sarajevo under UN control. Agreement between 'RS' and Bosnian Government to a ceasefire in Sarajevo, negotiated by Lieutenant-General Sir Michael Rose, then Commander of UN forces in Bosnia. >Afghanistan Osama Bin Laden's group in Afghanistan has executed strikes inside the US. >Libya NATO STOPPED the bloody civil war in Libya. Putin STARTED the bloody war in Ukraine. On 16 August 2003, Libya formally admitted responsibility for Pan Am Flight 103 (Lockabie bombing) in a letter presented to the president of the United Nations Security Council. "On 10 March 2011, France was the first country in the world to recognise the National Transitional Council as the legitimate government of Libya". United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 was adopted by the United Nations Security Council on 17 March 2011 in response to the First Libyan Civil War. The Security Council resolution was proposed by France, Lebanon, and the United Kingdom. Muammar Gaddafi played stupid games and win stupid prizes. >Iraq Iraq invaded Kuwait. Iraq STARTED the bloody war in Kuwait. Iraq's top oil exports countries from Jan to Jun 2020 1st, China! 29 million tonnes <---- LOL 2nd, India, 23 million tonnes 3rd, EU, 8 million tonnes 4th, South Korea, 6 million tonnes 5th, Turkey, 4 million tonnes with an upwards trend 5th, USA, 4 million tonnes with a downwards trend Report: Saudi Arabia Presses U.S. on Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Date: January 19, 1992 <----- note the 1992 year From AP NEWS NEW YORK (AP) _ Saudi Arabia is pressuring the Bush administration to secretly arm and give intelligence to Iraqi opposition forces so they can work to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a newspaper reported Sunday. The Saudis want the United States to give arms and intelligence to Kurdish rebels in north Iraq, Shiite Muslim fighters in the south and Sunni Muslim opposition forces in central Iraq, the Times said, quoting U.S. and allied officials it didn’t name.
    1
  9786. 1
  9787.  @elnazgog4515  Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq
    1
  9788. 1
  9789. 1
  9790. 1
  9791. 1
  9792. 1
  9793. 1
  9794. 1
  9795. 1
  9796. 1
  9797. 1
  9798. 1
  9799. 1
  9800. 1
  9801. 1
  9802. 1
  9803. 1
  9804. 1
  9805. 1
  9806. 1
  9807.  @Lowezar  Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq --- Kurdistan’s Interior Minister, Rebar Ahmed disagreed with Scott Ritter. Against Scott Ritter. STROUDSBURG, Pa.—A former United Nations weapons inspector who exchanged explicit online messages with a detective posing as a 15-year-old girl and then performed a sex act on himself in front of a webcam was sentenced Wednesday to at least 1 1/2 years in state prison. Scott Ritter, 50, was taken into custody immediately after Monroe County Judge Jennifer Sibum sentenced him to 18 to 66 months behind bars. It was the second time in eight years that Ritter, of Delmar, N.Y., found himself in legal trouble for trying to lure underage girls into illicit sex.
    1
  9808. 1
  9809. 1
  9810. 1
  9811. 1
  9812. 1
  9813. 1
  9814. 1
  9815. 1
  9816. 1
  9817. 1
  9818. 1
  9819. 1
  9820. 1
  9821. 1
  9822. 1
  9823. 1
  9824. 1
  9825. 1
  9826.  @henryseidel5469  Date: Jan. 7, 2010 Yanukovych: Ukraine will remain a neutral state. "It’s certain that Ukraine was and will be non-aligned state… We strive neither to join NATO nor the [CIS]CSTO [Collective Security Treaty Organization]. We’ll maintain a neutral status," Yanukovych said in an interview with the Komsomolskaya Pravda in Ukraine newspaper. -------- The trigger for Euromaidan was Yanukovych initiated non-neutrality policies such as joining a trade block instead of executing Switzerland-style neutrality. UK leaving the EU and joining CPTPP proves freedom of association. Before Euromaidan, Russia, however, has successfully used political and economic leverage to dissuade Ukraine from signing the E.U. deal. In the months prior to the Vilnius summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a trade war with Kiev, blocking nearly all imports from Ukraine and cutting energy supplies to the country. In turn, this reduced Ukrainian exports by 25 percent and shrank the economy by 1.5 percent. Some trade background for the context From Tradebarrier Index (lower score = less trade barriers) New Zealand's tariff score is 2.92 Australia's tariff score is 3.03 UK's tariff score is 3.94 (after Brexit) Japan's tariff score is 4.05 US's tariff score is 4.54 Germany's tariff score is 4.88 EU's tariff score is 4.88 Russia's tariff score is 6.16 <-------- China's tariff score is 6.8 <------ Russia wants to maintain its higher trade protectionist policies. Victoria Nuland herself doesn't have the power, but about 73% of the MPs—voted to "remove Viktor Yanukovych from the post of president of Ukraine" has the power. Don't assume Ukraine's president has absolute power when 73% of the MPs have voted to "remove Viktor Yanukovych from the post of president of Ukraine". ------ Ukraine Constitution 1991, Article 17, disallows foreign military bases after 2017. According to former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, Ukraine's constitution forbids the country from hosting foreign military bases after 2017. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1991, Article 17. In 2018, President Petro Poroshenko's constitution amendment allowed temporary foreign military bases. Your narrative is wrong.
    1
  9827. 1
  9828. 1
  9829. 1
  9830.  @ellavanr632  >n 2014 Ukrainian military killed 100+ civilians. But Russian military didn't kill anyone. And people voted to join Russia.. The Russian Federation initially denied that these were Russian military forces, but on 17 April 2014 Russian President Vladimir Putin finally confirmed the presence of the Russian military. Your attempts to deny Russia little green men in the Russo-Ukrainian War don't hide the fact it benefited Russia's federal system with the slicing of Chimera from Ukraine. In March 2014, the Finnish magazine Suomen Sotilas (Soldier of Finland) published an analysis of the weapons and equipment seen on photos of Russian "little green men". The article points to a number of weapons and pieces of equipment that it asserts are issued only to armed forces in the Russian Federation: New EMR camouflage combat uniforms New 6Sh112 or 6Sh117 tactical vest New 6B27 [ru], 6B7-1M composite helmet New 7.62 mm PKP machine guns 6B26 composite helmets (used only by airborne troops of the Russian Federation) 6Sh92-5 tactical vest (used only by airborne troops of the Russian Federation) Gorka-3 combat uniform (used only by Russian special forces and mountain troops) Smersh AK/VOG tactical vest (used only by Russian special forces) The article goes on to conclude that with a very high probability "these troops are the 45th Guards Separate Reconnaissance Regiment of the VDV" based in Kubinka, Moscow. Other media has published a photo of an unmarked Russian soldier armed with a VSS Vintorez taken as proof of deployment of Russian special forces. On 17 April 2014, President Putin admitted publicly for the first time that Russian special forces were involved in the events of Crimea, for the purposes of protecting local people and creating conditions for a referendum. Later, he admitted that the Russian Armed Forces had blocked the Armed Forces of Ukraine in Crimea during the events.
    1
  9831. 1
  9832. 1
  9833. 1
  9834. 1
  9835. 1
  9836. 1
  9837. 1
  9838. 1
  9839. 1
  9840. 1
  9841. 1
  9842. 1
  9843. 1
  9844. 1
  9845. 1
  9846. 1
  9847. 1
  9848. 1
  9849. 1
  9850. 1
  9851. 1
  9852. 1
  9853. 1
  9854. 1
  9855. 1
  9856. 1
  9857. 1
  9858. 1
  9859. 1
  9860. 1
  9861. 1
  9862. 1
  9863. 1
  9864. 1
  9865. 1
  9866. 1
  9867. 1
  9868. 1
  9869. 1
  9870. 1
  9871. 1
  9872. 1
  9873. 1
  9874. 1
  9875. 1
  9876. 1
  9877. 1
  9878. 1
  9879. 1
  9880. 1
  9881. 1
  9882. 1
  9883. 1
  9884. 1
  9885. 1
  9886. 1
  9887. 1
  9888. 1
  9889. 1
  9890. 1
  9891. 1
  9892. 1
  9893. 1
  9894. 1
  9895. 1
  9896. 1
  9897. 1
  9898. 1
  9899. 1
  9900. 1
  9901. 1
  9902. 1
  9903. 1
  9904. 1
  9905. 1
  9906. 1
  9907. 1
  9908. 1
  9909. 1
  9910. 1
  9911. 1
  9912. 1
  9913. 1
  9914. 1
  9915. 1
  9916. 1
  9917. 1
  9918. 1
  9919. 1
  9920. 1
  9921. EVIL GUNNEY, I already posted in counter arguments in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1Z_DuF87Sc LOL. Basic Wing loading without body and vortex lift. F-35A Empty weight: 28,999 lb (Year 2015). Wing area: 460 ft² Wing loading: 63.04 lbs/ sq feet F-16C Block 52 Wing area: 300 ft² Empty weight: 18,900 lb Wing loading: 63 lbs/ sq feet Tiny wings? F-35A's empty weight is 1.54X scaled from F-16C. F-35A's wing area is 1.53X scaled from F-16C. F-35A's 43000 lbf thrust is 1.50X scaled from F-16C's 28600 lbf. There's a near straight scaling between F16C to F-35A. From http://breakingdefense.com/2014/06/gen-mike-hostage-on-the-f-35-no-growlers-needed-when-war-starts/3/ General Mike Hostage On The F-35 vs F-16 The F-35, he says, has “at least” the maneuverability and thrust and weight of the F-16. The F-35 is to the F-22 as the F-16 is to the F-15. F-35A's main target goal is to replace current service F-16C. Apples to apples comparison based on F-16C's 550 Km combat radius F-35A (Year 2015 build). Set Combat Radius 550 km F-35A has 1407 Km combat radius Empty weight: 28,999 lb Wing Area: 460 ft² Weapons: 2000 lb Fuel: 7230.916844 lb Fuel load based on F-16C's 550Km combat radius Combat load: 38,230 lb Wing loading 83.11 lbs/ sq feet Thurst MIL 28000 lbf Thrust WET 43000 lbf Power-to-Weight: 1.12 :1 F-16C Block 52 Combat Radius 550 km Empty weight: 18,900 lb Wing Area: 300 ft² Weapons: 2000 lb Fuel: 7000 lb Combat load: 27,900 lb Wing loading 93.00 lbs/ sq feet Thrust MIL 17,800 Thrust WET 28,500 lbf Power-to-Weight: 1.02 :1 F-35A remains Power-to-Weight and Wing loading competitive against F-16C Block 52 up to about 800 Km combat radius. F-35A's 1407 Km combat radius is for combat transit range e.g. use Japan islands unsinkable aircraft carrier with more than enough range to strike at North Korea. ------ With body lift area. https://youtu.be/SsUCixAeZ0A?t=1038 F-14 designer (former Northrop Grumman VP Mike Ciminera) with body lift argument debunks Pierre Sprey's wing loading and wing size arguments. Most 4th gen fighters has body lift designs. https://s1.postimg.org/6xbltu4rj/Capture.png F-35A's real wing load i.e. colored green to blue are the lift surfaces. F-35A's real wing load i.e. colored green to blue are the lift surfaces. F-35's engine cowling generates lift that rivals wing lift hence easily duplicating F-18's long LEX or forward fix canards functions. Cant'ed twin tail adds additional rear lift. The oversize rear horizontal stabilizers has some lift and it's responsible for nose pitch (nose pointing). F-35A's effective lift area is about 620 sq ft. I have loaded F-35A's lift area into a CAD program and it yielded about 620 sq ft lift area with green-blue colored lift areas, minus horizontal stabilizers. With max 18,498 lb fuel load, F-35A has 75 lbs/ sq feet. With empty load, F-35A has 46 lbs/ sq feet. The real F-16 designer http://www.codeonemagazine.com/article.html?item_id=37 F-16 Designer Harry Hillaker Harry Hillaker's statement on low wing loading and wing size... We knew that we wanted low wing loading and high thrust loading. But we also knew that low wing loading means more weight and more drag Sprey's argument on wing loading and anti-small wings are not compete. Larger wings introduces higher drag . The trick with F-16's design is have medium wing loading, smallish wings and lower wing load during angle of attack turn with vortex lift. F-16 has blended wing design to get more lift from the body.
    1
  9922. 1
  9923. 1
  9924. 1
  9925. 1
  9926. 1
  9927. 1
  9928. 1
  9929. 1
  9930. 1
  9931. 1
  9932. 1
  9933. 1
  9934. 1
  9935. 1
  9936. 1
  9937. 1
  9938. 1
  9939. 1
  9940. 1
  9941. 1
  9942. 1
  9943. 1
  9944. 1
  9945. 1
  9946. 1
  9947. 1
  9948. 1
  9949. 1
  9950. 1
  9951. 1
  9952. 1
  9953. 1
  9954. 1
  9955. 1
  9956. 1
  9957. 1
  9958. 1
  9959. 1
  9960. 1
  9961. 1
  9962. 1
  9963. 1
  9964. 1
  9965. 1
  9966. 1
  9967. 1
  9968. 1
  9969. 1
  9970. 1
  9971. 1
  9972. 1
  9973. 1
  9974. 1
  9975. 1
  9976. 1
  9977. 1
  9978. 1
  9979. 1
  9980. 1
  9981. 1
  9982. 1
  9983. 1
  9984. 1
  9985. 1
  9986. 1
  9987. 1
  9988. 1
  9989. 1
  9990. 1
  9991. 1
  9992. 1
  9993. 1
  9994. 1
  9995. 1
  9996. 1
  9997. 1
  9998. 1
  9999. 1
  10000. 1
  10001. 1
  10002. 1
  10003. 1
  10004. 1
  10005. 1
  10006. 1
  10007. 1
  10008. 1
  10009. 1
  10010. 1
  10011. 1
  10012. 1
  10013. 1
  10014. 1
  10015. 1
  10016. 1
  10017. 1
  10018. 1
  10019. 1
  10020. 1
  10021. 1
  10022. 1
  10023. 1
  10024. 1
  10025. 1
  10026. 1
  10027. 1
  10028. 1
  10029. 1
  10030. 1
  10031. 1
  10032. 1
  10033. 1
  10034. 1
  10035. 1
  10036. 1
  10037. 1
  10038. 1
  10039. 1
  10040. 1
  10041. 1
  10042. 1
  10043. 1
  10044. 1
  10045. 1
  10046. 1
  10047. 1
  10048. 1
  10049. 1
  10050. 1
  10051. 1
  10052. 1
  10053. 1
  10054. 1
  10055. 1
  10056. 1
  10057. 1
  10058. 1
  10059. 1
  10060. 1
  10061. 1
  10062. 1
  10063. 1
  10064. 1
  10065. 1
  10066. 1
  10067. 1
  10068. 1
  10069. 1
  10070. 1
  10071. 1
  10072. 1
  10073. 1
  10074. 1
  10075. 1
  10076. 1
  10077. 1
  10078. 1
  10079. 1
  10080. 1
  10081.  @kickDustPedestrian  From euractiv However, Germany’s Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, who is also from the Greens, sees things in a different light. “As things stand at present, this pipeline cannot be approved because it does not meet the requirements of European energy law,” Baerbock told ZDF on 12 December, saying “the safety issues are still unresolved anyway”. Furthermore, it is clear “that in the event of further escalations, this pipeline could not be connected to the grid,” she said, noting that the agreement struck with the US during the last year of Angela Merkel’s reign had foreseen a similar understanding. The US had sought to ensure the territorial integrity of Ukraine without upholding the sanctions on the pipeline that had raised hackles in Berlin. Her position has now been enhanced by her fellow Green Super-Minister Robert Habeck. “Any new military action cannot remain without severe consequences,” Habeck stated in the interview as reported by DW. The option of blocking the pipeline would be on the table, if “there is a new violation of the territorial integrity” of Ukraine, he said. As Scholz has been officially appointed Chancellor on 8 December, the row may officially mark the end of the shortest ever honeymoon period for a German government, and reveals the difficult position his coalition currently finds itself in. Germany is heavily reliant on gas: more than 25% of energy used in the country comes from natural gas, a majority of which is imported from Russia. Nord Stream 2 is a beloved project of the SPD. The last SPD chancellor before Scholz, Gerhard Schröder, had overseen the construction of Nord Stream 1 while powerful party leaders continue to be committed to it. Scholz was secretary-general of the SPD under Schröder, underlining his longstanding involvement in the project. “We need this gas pipeline,” said Manuela Schwesig, the dominant SPD minister-president of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern in an interview with Spiegel, warning against “mixing the constriction of the pipeline with foreign policy issues”. The new Chancellor appears stuck between the demands of his party but is being publicly challenged by his vice chancellor and some of the government’s most powerful ministers, revealing internal tensions within the young government coalition. The €11 billion pipeline, which has been called “the biggest mistake” of Angela Merkel by EPP President Donald Tusk, may continue to rock domestic and foreign politics long after her departure. ---- German Greens will kill Nord Stream 2. Without the greens, Scholz's government is dead.
    1
  10082. 1
  10083. 1
  10084. 1
  10085. 1
  10086. 1
  10087. 1
  10088. 1
  10089. 1
  10090. 1
  10091. 1
  10092. 1
  10093. 1
  10094. 1
  10095. 1
  10096. 1
  10097. 1
  10098. 1
  10099. 1
  10100. 1
  10101. 1
  10102. 1
  10103. 1
  10104. 1
  10105. 1
  10106. 1
  10107. 1
  10108. 1
  10109. 1
  10110. 1
  10111. 1
  10112. 1
  10113. 1
  10114. 1
  10115. 1
  10116. 1
  10117. 1
  10118. 1
  10119. 1
  10120. 1
  10121. 1
  10122. 1
  10123. 1
  10124. 1
  10125. 1
  10126. 1
  10127. 1
  10128. 1
  10129. 1
  10130. 1
  10131. 1
  10132. 1
  10133. 1
  10134. 1
  10135. 1
  10136. 1
  10137. 1
  10138. 1
  10139. 1
  10140. 1
  10141. 1
  10142. 1
  10143. 1
  10144. 1
  10145. 1
  10146. 1
  10147. 1
  10148. 1
  10149. 1
  10150. 1
  10151. 1
  10152. 1
  10153. 1
  10154. 1
  10155. 1
  10156. 1
  10157. 1
  10158. 1
  10159. 1
  10160. 1
  10161. 1
  10162. 1
  10163. 1
  10164. 1
  10165. 1
  10166. 1
  10167. 1
  10168. 1
  10169. 1
  10170. 1
  10171. 1
  10172. "We cannot buy our security, our freedom from the threat of the bomb by committing an immorality so great as saying to a billion human beings now enslaved behind the Iron Curtain, "Give up your dreams of freedom because to save our own skins, we're willing to make a deal with your slave masters." Alexander Hamilton said, "A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one." Now let's set the record straight. There's no argument over the choice between peace and war, but there's only one guaranteed way you can have peace -- and you can have it in the next second -- surrender. Admittedly, there's a risk in any course we follow other than this, but every lesson of history tells us that the greater risk lies in appeasement, and this is the specter our well-meaning liberal friends refuse to face -- that their policy of accommodation is appeasement, and it gives no choice between peace and war, only between fight or surrender. If we continue to accommodate, continue to back and retreat, eventually we have to face the final demand -- the ultimatum. And what then -- when Nikita Khrushchev has told his people he knows what our answer will be? He has told them that we're retreating under the pressure of the Cold War, and someday when the time comes to deliver the final ultimatum, our surrender will be voluntary, because by that time we will have been weakened from within spiritually, morally, and economically. He believes this because from our side he's heard voices pleading for "peace at any price" or "better Red than dead," or as one commentator put it, he'd rather "live on his knees than die on his feet." And therein lies the road to war, because those voices don't speak for the rest of us. You and I know and do not believe that life is so dear and peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery. If nothing in life is worth dying for, when did this begin -- just in the face of this enemy? Or should Moses have told the children of Israel to live in slavery under the pharaohs? Should Christ have refused the cross? Should the patriots at Concord Bridge have thrown down their guns and refused to fire the shot heard 'round the world? The martyrs of history were not fools, and our honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis didn't die in vain. Where, then, is the road to peace? Well it's a simple answer after all. You and I have the courage to say to our enemies, "There is a price we will not pay." "There is a point beyond which they must not advance." And this -- this is the meaning in the phrase of Barry Goldwater's "peace through strength." Winston Churchill said, "The destiny of man is not measured by material computations. When great forces are on the move in the world, we learn we're spirits -- not animals." And he said, "There's something going on in time and space, and beyond time and space, which, whether we like it or not, spells duty." You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We'll preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on earth, or we'll sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness."
    1
  10173. 1
  10174. 1
  10175. 1
  10176. 1
  10177. 1
  10178. 1
  10179. 1
  10180. 1
  10181. 1
  10182. 1
  10183. 1
  10184. 1
  10185. 1
  10186. 1
  10187. 1
  10188. 1
  10189. 1
  10190.  @淡了时间距离  There are opposing views on the legality of the KMT takeover of Taiwan. The Chinese Communist government maintains to this day that the Republic of China on Taiwan is a province that must eventually return to rule by the mainland. According to an article published in 1955 on the legal status of Taiwan, "It has been charged that Chiang Kai-shek has no claim to the island because he is 'merely a fugitive quartering his army' there and besides, his is a government in exile." Moreover, the Treaty of San Francisco, which was officially signed by 48 nations on 8 September 1951, did not specify to whom Japan was ceding Taiwan and the Pescadores. Despite this, the ROC was viewed by the vast majority of states at the time as the legitimate representative of China, as it had succeeded the Qing Dynasty, while the PRC was at the time a mostly unrecognized state. Japan was, at the time of the signing of the Treaty of San Francisco, still technically under American occupation. After full independence, Japan established full relations with the ROC and not the PRC. According to Professor Gene Hsiao, "since the San Francisco Peace Treaty and the separate KMT treaty with Japan did not specify to whom Japan was ceding Taiwan and the Pescadores, the implication of the U.S. position was that legally, and insofar as the signatories of those two treaties were concerned, Taiwan became an 'ownerless' island and the KMT, by its own assent to the American policy, a foreign government-in-exile." Technically, KMT is a foreign government in exile under the American occupation of Japanese Taiwan islands.
    1
  10191. 1
  10192. 1
  10193. 1
  10194. 1
  10195. 1
  10196.  @老渡-i9c  When the Dutch East India Company arrived in Taiwan in 1624, they found no traces of any administration by the Ming Dynasty, which ruled China from 1368 through 1644. In fact, the Dutch – who had established a small fortress in the Pescadores in 1622 – were told by the Ming Tianqi Emperor that they should “go beyond our territory,” so the Dutch moved to what was then called Formosa, and ruled the island for 38 years, establishing the first administrative structure on Taiwan. Thus, it certainly was never part of the Ming Dynasty. Dutch rule ended in 1662, when Ming follower Koxinga – escaping from the newly-established Qing / Manchu Dynasty – sailed from the Fukien (Fujian) coast with some 400 ships and 25,000 men and laid siege around the Dutch fortress Zeelandia. After nine months, the Dutch surrendered, and Koxinga established his rule in the southwestern corner of Taiwan. This would only last for 21 years, until the surrender by his grandson to the forces of the Qing Dynasty in the Battle of Penghu in 1683. Koxinga and his family ruled Taiwan as the independent Kingdom of Tungning, not as part of the Ming Dynasty, which was gone by that time. The Qing emperor’s aim at the time was to destroy the rebellious Koxinga regime, not to conquer the island. In 1683, the Kangxi Emperor said specifically that “Taiwan is outside our empire and of no great consequence” and even offered to have the Dutch buy it back. Perhaps this is an inconvenient truth for the current rulers in Beijing. You can't handle the truth.
    1
  10197. 1
  10198. 1
  10199. 1
  10200. 1
  10201.  @老渡-i9c  Your "three Sino-US Joint Communiqués" narrative is false. No formal treaty was passed by the US Congres in relation to the "Three Communiqués". The 1st Joint Communiqué (a.k.a Shanghai Communiqué) was published in 1972 during the Nixon Presidency. No formal treaty was passed by the US Congres in relation to the 1st Joint Communiqué. For the 2nd Joint Communiqué, President Jimmy Carter unilaterally annul the Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty with the ROC, in response, the U.S. Congress passed the Taiwan Relations Act. US Congress had overwhelmingly passed the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) mandating that the United States provide Taiwan with “a sufficient self-defense capability.” Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) overrides President Jimmy Carter's Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty with the ROC annulment! The TRA was an angry and instantaneous reaction to Carter’s rupture of diplomatic and military relations with the Republic of China. Reagan immediately disavowed the communique. According to Kissinger, he (Reagan) admonished the National Review’s editor: “You can tell your friends there I have not changed my mind one damn bit about Taiwan. Whatever weapons they need to defend themselves against attacks or invasion by Red China, they will get from the United States.” Known as the Six Assurances, it provided that Washington would not (1) set a date for termination of arms sales, (2) amend the TRA, (3) consult with China regarding U.S. arms sales, (4) mediate between Taiwan and China, (5) alter its position that Taiwan’s future be decided peacefully between the parties, or pressure Taiwan to negotiate, or (6) recognize Chinese sovereignty over Taiwan.
    1
  10202. 1
  10203. 1
  10204. 1
  10205. 1
  10206. 1
  10207. 1
  10208. 1
  10209. 1
  10210. 1
  10211.  @alexsilent5603  From the same The Guardian news article The Russians had moved mercenaries and paramilitary forces into South Ossetia in apparent preparation for armed hostilities before Saakashvili's disastrous offensive, which triggered a Russian invasion and left his country partitioned. But the proper Russian reponse to the artillery barrage came – by land, sea and air – 12 hours after the Georgian action. The report concluded that South Ossetian irregular forces violated the rules of war in attacks on Georgian villages and that Russian peacekeeping forces "would not or could not" control them. Russian claims of Georgian "genocide" in South Ossetia were dismissed and Russian claims that Georgians had killed 2,000 civilians were found to be wildly exaggerated. The report put the figure of civilian dead at 162 on the South Ossetian side. The secession of South Ossetia and Abkhazia from Georgia was branded illegal and Russian recognition of the two "states" in breach of international law.The report found that Moscow had been assiduously preparing the secession by, among other things, a policy of "passportification", illegally distributing Russian passports on a mass scale among the breakaway populations It traced the conflict back to the early 90s and the fallout from the collapse of the Soviet Union and accused the Kremlin of abusing its status as a "great power" to coerce "a small and insubordinate neighbour." The Russian forces in South Ossetia failed to stop irregulars conduct a campaign of ethnic cleansing against Georgian villages, entailing looting, rape, hostage-taking, and arbitrary arrest.
    1
  10212. 1
  10213. 1
  10214. 1
  10215. 1
  10216. 1
  10217. 1
  10218. 1
  10219. 1
  10220. 1
  10221. 1
  10222. 1
  10223.  @СергейКорепин-к1о  1918, 1. Allied intervention in the Russian Civil War consisted of a series of multi-national military expeditions which began in 1918. The Allies first had the goal of helping the Czechoslovak Legion in securing supplies of munitions and armaments in Russian ports. At times between 1918 and 1920 the Czechoslovak Legion controlled the entire Trans-Siberian Railway and several major cities in Siberia. By 1919 the goal was to help the White forces in the Russian Civil War . 2. The goals of these small-scale interventions were partly to stop Germany from exploiting Russian resources , to defeat the Central Powers, and to support some of the Allied forces that had become trapped within Russia after the Bolshevik revolution. Allied troops also landed in Arkhangelsk and in Vladivostok as part of the North Russia intervention and Siberian intervention. The Czechoslovak Legion was at times in control of most of the Trans-Siberian railway and all major cities in Siberia. Austro-Hungarian prisoners were of a number of various nationalities; some Czechoslovak POWs deserted to the Russian Army. Czechoslovaks had long desired to create their own independent state, and the Russians aided in establishing special Czechoslovak units (the Czechoslovak Legions) to fight the Central Powers. The signing of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk ensured that prisoners-of-war (POW) would be repatriated. In 1917, the Bolsheviks stated that if the Czechoslovak Legions remained neutral and agreed to leave Russia, they would be granted safe passage through Siberia en route to France via Vladivostok to fight with the Allied forces on the Western Front. The Czechoslovak Legions travelled via the Trans-Siberian Railway to Vladivostok. However, fighting between the Legions and the Bolsheviks erupted in May 1918. Allied concerns The Allied Powers became concerned at the collapse of the Eastern Front and the loss of their Tsarist ally to communism, and there was also the question of the large quantities of supplies and equipment in Russian ports, which the Allied Powers feared might be seized by the Germans. Also worrisome to the Allied Powers was the April 1918 landing of a division of German troops in Finland, increasing speculation they might attempt to capture the Murmansk-Petrograd railway, and subsequently the strategic port of Murmansk and possibly Arkhangelsk. Other concerns regarded the potential destruction of the Czechoslovak Legions and the threat of Bolshevism, the nature of which worried many Allied governments. Meanwhile, Allied materiel in transit quickly accumulated in the warehouses in Arkhangelsk and Murmansk. Estonia had established a national army with the support of Finnish volunteers and were defending against the 7th Red Army's attack Faced with these events, the British and French governments decided upon an Allied military intervention in Russia. Ironically, however, the first British landing in Russia came at the request of a local (Bolshevik) Soviet council. Fearing a German attack on the town, the Murmansk Soviet requested that the Allies landed troops for protection. British troops arrived on 4 March 1918, the day after the signing of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk between Germany and the Bolshevik government. (Bolshevik) Soviet council requested aid from the British against the Germans. LOL
    1
  10224.  @СергейКорепин-к1о  The Russian Revolution has gone down in history as the victory of the workers and peasants over the Czarist rulers. Few people realize the German Kaiser was also involved: He gave aid to the Bolsheviks in 1917. Be careful to not choke on your aspirations. In the end, Russia itself terminated USSR. The Russian borders established by the Treaty_of_Brest-Litovsk bear an almost exact similarity to the post-1991 borders established after the fall of the Soviet Union. The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk meant that Russia now was helping Germany win the war by freeing up a million German soldiers for the Western Front and by "relinquishing much of Russia's food supply, industrial base, fuel supplies, and communications with Western Europe". According to historian Spencer Tucker, the Allied Powers felt that "The treaty was the ultimate betrayal of the Allied cause and sowed the seeds for the Cold War. With Brest-Litovsk, the spectre of German domination in Eastern Europe threatened to become reality, and the Allies now began to think seriously about military intervention [in Russia]." For the Western Allied Powers, the terms that Germany had imposed on Russia were interpreted as a warning of what to expect if the Central Powers won the war. Between Brest-Litovsk and the point when the situation in the Western Front became dire, some officials in the German government and the high command began to favor offering more lenient terms to the Allied Powers in exchange for their recognition of German gains in the east. The treaty marked a significant contraction of the territory controlled by the Bolsheviks or that they could lay claim to as effective successors of the Russian Empire. While the independence of Poland was already accepted by them in principle, and Lenin had signed a document accepting the Finnish independence, the loss of Ukraine and the Baltics created, from the Bolshevik perspective, dangerous bases of anti-Bolshevik military activity in the subsequent Russian Civil War (1918–1922). However, Bolshevik control of Ukraine and Transcaucasia was at the time fragile or non-existent.[43] Many Russian nationalists and some revolutionaries were furious at the Bolsheviks' acceptance of the treaty and joined forces to fight them. Non-Russians who inhabited the lands lost by Bolshevik Russia in the treaty saw the changes as an opportunity to set up independent states.
    1
  10225. 1
  10226. 1
  10227. 1
  10228. 1
  10229.  @KP-if5kc  >NATO also said they would not expand toward Russia's borders False. Myth 1: NATO promised Russia it would not expand after the Cold War Fact: Such an agreement was never made. NATO’s door has been open to new members since it was founded in 1949 – and that has never changed. This “Open Door Policy” is enshrined in Article 10 of NATO’s founding treaty, which says “any other European State in a position to further the principles of this Treaty and to contribute to the security of the North Atlantic” can apply for membership. Decisions on membership are taken by consensus among all Allies. No treaty signed by the United States, Europe and Russia included provisions on NATO membership. The idea of NATO expansion beyond a united Germany was not on the agenda in 1989, particularly as the Warsaw Pact still existed. This was confirmed by Mikhail Gorbachev in an interview in 2014: "The topic of 'NATO expansion' was not discussed at all, and it wasn't brought up in those years. I say this with full responsibility. Not a single Eastern European country raised the issue, not even after the Warsaw Pact ceased to exist in 1991. Western leaders didn't bring it up, either." Declassified White House transcripts also reveal that, in 1997, Bill Clinton consistently refused Boris Yeltsin's offer of a 'gentlemen's agreement' that no former Soviet Republics would enter NATO: "I can't make commitments on behalf of NATO, and I'm not going to be in the position myself of vetoing NATO expansion with respect to any country, much less letting you or anyone else do so…NATO operates by consensus."
    1
  10230. 1
  10231. @Tall Walt Johnson That's a false equivalence. Unlike Russia, the US did NOT assimilate Afghanistan, Syria, and Libya into US federal structure. >Afghanistan Osama Bin Laden's group in Afghanistan has executed strikes inside the US. >Libya NATO STOPPED the bloody civil war in Libya. Putin STARTED the bloody war in Ukraine. On 16 August 2003, Libya formally admitted responsibility for Pan Am Flight 103 (Lockabie bombing) in a letter presented to the president of the United Nations Security Council. "On 10 March 2011, France was the first country in the world to recognise the National Transitional Council as the legitimate government of Libya". United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 was adopted by the United Nations Security Council on 17 March 2011 in response to the First Libyan Civil War. The Security Council resolution was proposed by France, Lebanon, and the United Kingdom. Muammar Gaddafi played stupid games and win stupid prizes. >Iraq Iraq invaded Kuwait. Iraq STARTED the bloody war in Kuwait. Iraq's top oil exports countries from Jan to Jun 2020 1st, China! 29 million tonnes <---- LOL 2nd, India, 23 million tonnes 3rd, EU, 8 million tonnes 4th, South Korea, 6 million tonnes 5th, Turkey, 4 million tonnes with an upwards trend 5th, USA, 4 million tonnes with a downwards trend Report: Saudi Arabia Presses U.S. on Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Date: January 19, 1992 <--- note the year. From AP NEWS NEW YORK (AP) _ Saudi Arabia is pressuring the Bush administration to secretly arm and give intelligence to Iraqi opposition forces so they can work to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a newspaper reported Sunday. The Saudis want the United States to give arms and intelligence to Kurdish rebels in north Iraq, Shiite Muslim fighters in the south and Sunni Muslim opposition forces in central Iraq, the Times said, quoting U.S. and allied officials it didn’t name.
    1
  10232. 1
  10233. 1
  10234. 1
  10235. 1
  10236. 1
  10237. 1
  10238. 1
  10239. 1
  10240. 1
  10241. 1
  10242. 1
  10243. 1
  10244. 1
  10245. 1
  10246. 1
  10247. 1
  10248. 1
  10249. 1
  10250. 1
  10251. 1
  10252. 1
  10253. 1
  10254. 1
  10255. 1
  10256. 1
  10257. 1
  10258. 1
  10259. 1
  10260. 1
  10261. 1
  10262. 1
  10263. 1
  10264. 1
  10265.  @torrokasparov2210  1. Ex-Colonel Macgregor (who left US Army in June 2004) did not consider ramifications in relation to Budapest Memorandum. 2. Ex-Colonel Macgregor's argument runs contrary to the Trump administration's withdrawal from Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces. 3. EUCOM has 75,000 personnel already in Europe, British has 153,290 active personnel (1_January_2021_SPS PDF) and Poland has 160,000 active personnel (2022). Poland has 1,700,000 reserve personnel (2022). Using the UK as a large unsinkable aircraft carrier, USAF F-35A's 1407 km combat radius (internal tanks) can reach into Ukraine. From Norway, F-35A's has a striking range into Moscow. From Italy, F-35A's has a striking range near Moscow. Finland is buying F-35A with a 1407 km combat radius which has a longer range when compared to Finland's existing F/A-18C's 740 km combat radius (can reach just outside of Moscow). Poland is buying F-35A with a 1407 km. F-35A has a longer range with an engine upgrade road map and external fuel tanks. F-35A was purpose-designed to invade a certain hostile country from the pre-1997 position, unlike a short-leg defensive fighter F-16. F-35A has reduced the need for air tankers and USN's aircraft carriers. F-35A's digital FCS and powerful onboard computers can be modified as an unmanned supersonic stealth cruise missile platform for two B61 Mod 12 nuclear bombs. Every European country with F-35A has gained long-range strike capability and turned short-range defensive B61 nuclear bombs into deep strike B61 Mod 12 nuclear bombs. Germany's interest has returned to F-35A for its NATO shared B61 Mod 12 nuclear bomb strike platform. Putin's complaining about Ageis AShore MK41 VLS in Poland and Romania are distractions. Ex-Colonel Macgregor has a US Army mindset, not from the US Strategic Command mindset. US Strategic Command has USN Admiral Charles A. Richard, USAF Lt General Thomas A. Bussiere, and USMC SgtMaj Howard L. Kreamer. US Strategic Command is stacked with USAF, USN, and USMC commanding officers. 4. Ex-Colonel Macgregor's combined arms reform argument is not new since the Department of the Navy already has combined arms with the United States Marine Corps.
    1
  10266. 1
  10267. 1
  10268. 1
  10269. 1
  10270. 1
  10271. 1
  10272. 1
  10273. 1
  10274. 1
  10275. 1
  10276. 1
  10277. 1
  10278. 1
  10279. 1
  10280. 1
  10281. 1
  10282. 1
  10283. 1
  10284. 1
  10285. 1
  10286. 1
  10287. 1
  10288. 1
  10289. 1
  10290. 1
  10291. 1
  10292. 1
  10293. 1
  10294. 1
  10295. 1
  10296. 1
  10297. 1
  10298. 1
  10299.  @zharkoo  Before Euromaidan, Russia started a trade war against Ukraine, forcing Yanukovych to sign a base rental extension agreement that breached Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 disallows foreign military bases after 2017. You missed the small detail in Ukraine's Constitution 1996, Article 17 which disallows foreign military bases after 2017. Read the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 which disallows foreign military bases after 2017. CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on 28 June 1996 Article 17 The location of foreign military bases shall not be permitted on the territory of Ukraine. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17. After 2017, Ukraine's constitution is incompatible with foreign military bases hosting either NATO or CSTO. If Yanukovych didn't sign the military base rental extension, Russia would be kicked out of Crimea. Putin's narrative is FALSE. 1. 1863–1864 January uprising, Russian Empire crushed Polish, Lithuanian, and Ukrainian insurgents uprising. 2. Soviet–Ukrainian War occurred between 1917 to 1921, a war between the Ukrainian People's Republic vs the Bolsheviks i.e. Ukrainian Soviet Republic and Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (modern-day Russian Federation). 3. 2014, Russo-Ukrainian War. March 1, 2014, the Federation Council of the Russian Federation unanimously adopted a resolution to petition Russian President Vladimir Putin to use military force in Ukraine. These "old world" issues existed before the US being a superpower. Both China and Russia are the two surviving "old world" imperial empires that largely preserved their imperial land territories. China and Russia think that communism clean slate of their imperialist colonial past. You can't handle the truth.
    1
  10300.  @zharkoo  CPC's land reform is fake since it did NOT transfer land titles to families. Land Reform in Postwar Japan As part of the democratization of Japan after World War II, Japanese leaders and Occupation authorities worked together to carry out land reform. It is regarded as one of the most successful of the Occupation-era reforms, and has become the model for land reform in other countries. The purpose of land reform was to reduce the wide gap between absentee landlords who owned agricultural land but did not farm it themselves, and tenant farmers who rented the land in exchange for giving the landlord a high proportion of the crop. The land reform laws were intended to limit the amount of farm land one household could own to about the amount of land that one family could farm themselves, without outside labor. The government forced absentee landlords to sell all their land to the government. Farmers were allowed to own a small amount of farm land that they could rent out to others ( 2.5 acres or one hectare in most parts of Japan, and 10 acres or 4 hectares in Hokkaido), and had to sell any excess to the government. The government then sold this land, usually to the tenant who had been farming it. The result greatly improved the living conditions of farmers. Idealogical basis: The West has its own idealogy on land reform based on the family unit and private ownership as its core idealogy. This is Douglas Macarthur's land reform with private land title transfers. VS Marxist = land reform transfer to the state, no private land title transfer to the workers. Marxist socialism is fake since it doesn't transfer ownership to families.
    1
  10301.  @anuvisraa5786  FALSE. The Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority-governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". --------------- In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical. USSR's proxy attempted to remove Chile's check-and-balance Congress system. USSR's proxy attempted to concentrate political power into a single entity (individual and political party). The US has no problems with the Swedish-style nanny market led-socialism that is practiced in the CANZUK and Nordic countries.
    1
  10302. 1
  10303. 1
  10304. 1
  10305. 1
  10306. 1
  10307. 1
  10308. 1
  10309. 1
  10310. 1
  10311. 1
  10312. 1
  10313. 1
  10314. 1
  10315. 1
  10316. 1
  10317. 1
  10318. 1
  10319. 1
  10320. 1
  10321. 1
  10322. 1
  10323. 1
  10324. 1
  10325. 1
  10326. 1
  10327. 1
  10328. 1
  10329. 1
  10330. 1
  10331. 1
  10332. 1
  10333. 1
  10334. 1
  10335. 1
  10336. 1
  10337. 1
  10338. 1
  10339. 1
  10340. 1
  10341. 1
  10342. 1
  10343. 1
  10344. 1
  10345. 1
  10346. 1
  10347. 1
  10348. 1
  10349. 1
  10350. 1
  10351. 1
  10352. 1
  10353. 1
  10354. 1
  10355. 1
  10356. 1
  10357. 1
  10358. 1
  10359. 1
  10360. 1
  10361. 1
  10362. 1
  10363. 1
  10364. 1
  10365. 1
  10366. 1
  10367. 1
  10368. 1
  10369. 1
  10370. 1
  10371. 1
  10372. 1
  10373. 1
  10374. 1
  10375. 1
  10376. 1
  10377. 1
  10378. 1
  10379. 1
  10380. 1
  10381. 1
  10382. 1
  10383. 1
  10384. 1
  10385. 1
  10386. 1
  10387. 1
  10388. 1
  10389. 1
  10390. 1
  10391. 1
  10392. 1
  10393. 1
  10394. 1
  10395. 1
  10396. 1
  10397. 1
  10398. 1
  10399. 1
  10400. 1
  10401. 1
  10402. 1
  10403. 1
  10404. 1
  10405. 1
  10406. 1
  10407. 1
  10408. 1
  10409. 1
  10410. 1
  10411. 1
  10412. 1
  10413. 1
  10414. 1
  10415. 1
  10416. 1
  10417. 1
  10418. 1
  10419. 1
  10420. 1
  10421. 1
  10422. 1
  10423. 1
  10424. 1
  10425. 1
  10426. 1
  10427. 1
  10428. 1
  10429. 1
  10430. 1
  10431. 1
  10432. 1
  10433. 1
  10434. 1
  10435. 1
  10436. 1
  10437. 1
  10438. 1
  10439. 1
  10440. 1
  10441. 1
  10442. 1
  10443. 1
  10444. 1
  10445. 1
  10446. 1
  10447. 1
  10448. 1
  10449. 1
  10450. 1
  10451. 1
  10452. 1
  10453. 1
  10454. 1
  10455. 1
  10456. 1
  10457. 1
  10458. 1
  10459. 1
  10460. 1
  10461. 1
  10462. 1
  10463. 1
  10464. 1
  10465. 1
  10466. 1
  10467. 1
  10468. 1
  10469. 1
  10470. 1
  10471. 1
  10472. 1
  10473. 1
  10474. 1
  10475. 1
  10476. 1
  10477. 1
  10478. 1
  10479. 1
  10480. 1
  10481. 1
  10482. 1
  10483. 1
  10484. 1
  10485. 1
  10486. 1
  10487. 1
  10488. 1
  10489. 1
  10490. 1
  10491. 1
  10492. 1
  10493. 1
  10494. 1
  10495. 1
  10496. 1
  10497. 1
  10498. 1
  10499. 1
  10500. 1
  10501. 1
  10502. 1
  10503. 1
  10504. 1
  10505. 1
  10506. 1
  10507. 1
  10508. 1
  10509. 1
  10510. 1
  10511. 1
  10512. 1
  10513. 1
  10514. 1
  10515. 1
  10516. 1
  10517. 1
  10518. 1
  10519. 1
  10520. 1
  10521. 1
  10522. 1
  10523. 1
  10524. 1
  10525. 1
  10526. 1
  10527. 1
  10528. 1
  10529. 1
  10530. 1
  10531. 1
  10532. 1
  10533. 1
  10534. 1
  10535. 1
  10536. 1
  10537. 1
  10538. 1
  10539. 1
  10540. 1
  10541. 1
  10542. 1
  10543. 1
  10544. 1
  10545. 1
  10546. 1
  10547. 1
  10548. 1
  10549. 1
  10550. 1
  10551. 1
  10552. 1
  10553. 1
  10554. 1
  10555. 1
  10556. 1
  10557. 1
  10558. 1
  10559. 1
  10560. 1
  10561. 1
  10562. 1
  10563. 1
  10564. 1
  10565. 1
  10566. 1
  10567.  @johnrittel6129  Another problem. News(from ABC NET AU) : Ancient virus lurking in remote Australia, affecting thousands of Aboriginal adults In a brightly lit lab in the outback town of Alice Springs, researchers have been inspecting vials of blood infected with an ancient virus that has lurked in Australia for thousands of years. It is called T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1— or HTLV-1 — and Australia has the highest levels in the world. A distant relative of HIV, it is a blood-borne virus that can be sexually transmitted or passed from mother to child. The virus can lead to inflammation of the skin, eyes and lungs. "You're also at risk of developing things like leukemia, so blood cancer, and becoming disabled through spinal cord injuries," researcher Joel Liddle said. "Once your pro-viral load is high, you're at a high risk of poor health." Researchers said, in most cases, leukaemia caused by the virus could be "rapidly fatal". Researchers from the Baker Institute for Heart and Diabetes in Alice Springs estimated 45 percent of Indigenous adults in central Australia had HTLV-1 . "In remote Australia, it's so out of sight, out of mind with a lot of things, health is just one of those things," Mr Liddle said. One of the difficulties with this virus is that most of those who have HTLV-1, don't know they have it, and a vast number of Aboriginal communities have never been tested. "I think there's probably confusion and a little bit of anger, too. People [question] why haven't they been told about this," Mr Liddle said. "There's a lot of reasons to breastfeed. Prolonged breastfeeding may be something that could be addressed but that's up to Aboriginal people to decide." For Mr Liddle, an Arrernte man, a response to high rates of HTLV-1 demands a delicate approach, with intensive education work delivered in Aboriginal languages. "I think there's a lot of work to do, certainly I think at the moment, what I see as our main thing is to engage sensitively around the issues because we're dealing with people's health, and all the things and complexities that are going on in remote communities, so we have to be really mindful of that." ------ This ancient virus is related to HIV( i.e. HTLV-1) and reduces an adult's life span. To fix this issue, non-Aboriginal R&D will be needed to cure this ancient issue, promote safe sex culture (i.e. change culture), and practise monogamy (i.e. change culture).
    1
  10568. 1
  10569. 1
  10570. 1
  10571. 1
  10572. 1
  10573. 1
  10574. 1
  10575. 1
  10576. 1
  10577. 1
  10578. 1
  10579. 1
  10580. 1
  10581. 1
  10582. 1
  10583. 1
  10584. 1
  10585. 1
  10586. 1
  10587. 1
  10588. 1
  10589. 1
  10590. 1
  10591. 1
  10592. 1
  10593. 1
  10594. 1
  10595. 1
  10596. 1
  10597. 1
  10598. 1
  10599. 1
  10600. 1
  10601. 1
  10602. 1
  10603. 1
  10604. 1
  10605. 1
  10606. 1
  10607. 1
  10608. 1
  10609. 1
  10610. 1
  10611. 1
  10612. 1
  10613. 1
  10614. 1
  10615. 1
  10616. 1
  10617. 1
  10618. 1
  10619. 1
  10620.  @Nooraksi  1. KMT is overreaching its territorial claim since on the eve of the 1894 Sino-Japanese War, about 45 percent of the island was administered under the Manchus Qing administration (Imperial China) while the remaining land area was populated by Taiwanese aborigines. 2. KMT was militarily defeated by CCP. KMT rejected CCP and it has runaway to Formosa. 3. KMT was politically defeated by partly aboriginal Taiwanese Tsai Ing-wen Democratic Progressive Party. On the eve of the 1894 Sino-Japanese War, about 45 percent of the island was administered under the Manchus Qing administration (Imperial China) while the remaining was populated by Taiwanese aborigines. ----- Chiang Kai-Shek Supplementing The Act Of Surrender 1945 excluded Manchuria, Formosa, and French Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude. Order Of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-Shek Supplementing The Act Of Surrender 1945 This is order No. 1 of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek to the Japanese forces in China, excluding Manchuria, Formosa, and French Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude, which were surrendered under the act of 9 September 1945. This order supplements the acts of surrender to the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers and his General Order No. 1. Order of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek supplementing the Act of Surrender 9 September 1945 Immediately following the signing of the Act of Surrender ending the war in the China Theatre, General Ho Ying-chen handed Order No. 1 of Generalissimo Chiang to Lieut. Gen. Okamura Yasutsugu as a supplement to the Act of Surrender. I. This is order No. 1 of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek to the Japanese forces in China, excluding Manchuria, Formosa, and French Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude, which were surrendered under the act of 9 September 1945. This order supplements the acts of surrender to the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers and his General Order No. 1. II. The Japanese Commanders surrendering the Japanese forces in the areas named above will issue the following order to and insure compliance of such order by all forces under their command. 1. The Emperor of Japan, the Japanese government and the Japanese Imperial General Headquarters have recognized complete military defeat of the Japanese military forces by the Allied forces and have surrendered unconditionally all Japanese forces to the Allied Powers. 2. All the Japanese ground, sea, air, and auxiliary forces within China, excluding Manchuria, Formosa and Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude, have been surrendered unconditionally to Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek and henceforth all such surrendered Japanese forces will be subject to the control of the Generalissimo. Their movements and activities will be dictated by him, and they will obey only orders or proclamations issued or authorized by him, or orders of their Japanese commanders based upon his instructions.
    1
  10621. 1
  10622. 1
  10623. 1
  10624. 1
  10625. 1
  10626. 1
  10627. 1
  10628. 1
  10629. 1
  10630. 1
  10631. 1
  10632. 1
  10633. 1
  10634. 1
  10635. 1
  10636. 1
  10637. 1
  10638. 1
  10639. 1
  10640. 1
  10641. 1
  10642. 1
  10643. 1
  10644. 1
  10645. 1
  10646. 1
  10647. 1
  10648. 1
  10649. 1
  10650. 1
  10651. 1
  10652. 1
  10653. 1
  10654. 1
  10655. 1
  10656. 1
  10657. 1
  10658. 1
  10659. 1
  10660. 1
  10661. 1
  10662. 1
  10663. 1
  10664. 1
  10665. 1
  10666. 1
  10667. 1
  10668. 1
  10669. 1
  10670. 1
  10671. 1
  10672. 1
  10673. 1
  10674. 1
  10675. 1
  10676. 1
  10677. 1
  10678. 1
  10679. 1
  10680. 1
  10681. 1
  10682. 1
  10683. 1
  10684. 1
  10685. 1
  10686. 1
  10687. 1
  10688. 1
  10689. 1
  10690. 1
  10691. 1
  10692. 1
  10693. 1
  10694. 1
  10695. 1
  10696. 1
  10697. 1
  10698. 1
  10699. 1
  10700. 1
  10701. 1
  10702. 1
  10703. 1
  10704. 1
  10705. 1
  10706. 1
  10707. 1
  10708. 1
  10709. 1
  10710. 1
  10711. 1
  10712. 1
  10713. 1
  10714. 1
  10715. 1
  10716. 1
  10717. 1
  10718. 1
  10719. 1
  10720. 1
  10721. 1
  10722. 1
  10723. 1
  10724. 1
  10725. 1
  10726. 1
  10727. 1
  10728. 1
  10729. 1
  10730. 1
  10731. 1
  10732. 1
  10733. 1
  10734. 1
  10735. 1
  10736. 1
  10737. 1
  10738. 1
  10739. 1
  10740. 1
  10741. 1
  10742. 1
  10743. 1
  10744. 1
  10745. 1
  10746. 1
  10747. 1
  10748. 1
  10749. 1
  10750. 1
  10751. 1
  10752. 1
  10753. 1
  10754. 1
  10755. 1
  10756. 1
  10757. 1
  10758. 1
  10759. 1
  10760. 1
  10761. 1
  10762. 1
  10763. 1
  10764. 1
  10765. 1
  10766. 1
  10767. 1
  10768. 1
  10769. 1
  10770. 1
  10771. 1
  10772. 1
  10773. 1
  10774. 1
  10775. 1
  10776. 1
  10777. 1
  10778. 1
  10779. 1
  10780. 1
  10781. 1
  10782. 1
  10783. 1
  10784. 1
  10785. 1
  10786. 1
  10787. 1
  10788. 1
  10789. 1
  10790. 1
  10791. 1
  10792. 1
  10793. 1
  10794. 1
  10795. 1
  10796. 1
  10797. 1
  10798. 1
  10799. 1
  10800. 1
  10801. 1
  10802. 1
  10803. 1
  10804.  @mrexpress8002  >do you have a short memory: iraq libya palestine syria oh the irony >Libya NATO STOPPED the bloody civil war in Libya. Putin STARTED the bloody war in Ukraine. On 16 August 2003, Libya formally admitted responsibility for Pan Am Flight 103 (Lockabie bombing) in a letter presented to the president of the United Nations Security Council. "On 10 March 2011, France was the first country in the world to recognise the National Transitional Council as the legitimate government of Libya". >Iraq Iraq invaded Kuwait. Iraq's top oil exports countries from Jan to Jun 2020 1st, China! 29 million tonnes <---- LOL 2nd, India, 23 million tonnes 3rd, EU, 8 million tonnes 4th, South Korea, 6 million tonnes 5th, Turkey, 4 million tonnes with an upwards trend 5th, USA, 4 million tonnes with a downwards trend -------- Report: Saudi Arabia Presses U.S. on Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Date: January 19, 1992 From AP NEWS NEW YORK (AP) _ Saudi Arabia is pressuring the Bush administration to secretly arm and give intelligence to Iraqi opposition forces so they can work to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a newspaper reported Sunday. The Saudis want the United States to give arms and intelligence to Kurdish rebels in north Iraq, Shiite Muslim fighters in the south and Sunni Muslim opposition forces in central Iraq, the Times said, quoting U.S. and allied officials it didn’t name. -------- Sheikhdom of Kuwait BEFORE WW1! Kuwait was founded in 1613 AD as a fishing village known as Grane (Kureyn). The region soon came under the rule of the Bani Khalid Emirate in 1670 after the expulsion of the Ottomans from Eastern Arabia (Lahsa Eyalet) by Barrack bin Ghurayr, Emir of the Bani Khalid, who successfully besieged the Ottoman governor Umar Pasha who surrendered and gave up his rule as the fourth Ottoman governor of al-Hasa. In 1752, Kuwait became independent after an agreement between the Sheikh of Kuwait and the Emir of Bani Khalid in which Bani Khalid recognised Sabah I bin Jaber's independent rule over Kuwait and in exchange Kuwait would not ally itself or support the enemies of Bani Khalid or interfere in the internal affairs of Bani Khalid in any way. >palestine This is Judea's problem.
    1
  10805.  @matthewgibbs6886  do you have a short memory Your memory is even shorter. ----------- Twenty Iraqi Kurds have taken legal action to expose French firms who supplied poison gas to Saddam Hussein in 1988. The plaintiffs were among the victims of a chemical weapon attack that killed 5,000 in the town of Halabja during the Iran-Iraq war. A Dutch businessman who sold Iraq chemicals used in the attack was ordered to pay 400,000 euros to some of the victims in April 2013. ----------- Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq
    1
  10806. 1
  10807. 1
  10808. 1
  10809.  @bodryy_vecher  Russian_conquest_of_Central_Asia 1718-1847: Gaining control of the Kazakh Steppe Fall of the Kazakh Khanate (1847) 1839: Failed attack on Khiva. See Khivan campaign of 1839. 1847–1853: The Syr Darya line 1847–1864: Down the eastern side 1864–1868: Kokand and Bukhara subdued, Russian conquest of Bukhara 1875–1876: Liquidation of the Kokand Khanate 1873: The conquest of Khiva 1879–1885: Turkmenistan: Geok Tepe, Merv and Panjdeh 1879: Lomakin's defeat at Geok Tepe 1884: The annexation of Merv 1885: Expansion stopped at Panjdeh 1872–1895: The Eastern Mountains 1867–1877: Yakub Beg 1871–1883: temporary occupation of Kulja 1893: Pamirs occupied Results speak themselves with Imperial Russia/Russian Federation having the largest land area in the world! -------------------- Grand Duchy of Moscow (1263–1547) 1368–1372 Lithuanian-Muscovite War 1376 Muscovite-Volga Bulgars war 1467–1469 Qasim War 1471 Battle of Shelon 1480 Great stand on the Ugra river 1478 Siege of Kazan 1492–1494 First Muscovite-Lithuanian War 1495–1497 Russo-Swedish War 1500–1503 Second Muscovite-Lithuanian War 1505–1507 Russo-Kazan War 1507–1508 Third Muscovite-Lithuanian War 1512–1522 Fourth Muscovite-Lithuanian War 1534–1537 Fifth Muscovite-Lithuanian War Tsardom of Russia (1547–1721) 1552 Siege of Kazan 1552–1556 Tatar Rebellion 1554–1557 Ivan the Terrible’s Swedish War 1556 Russian conquest of Astrakhan 1558–1583 Livonian War 1568–1570 Astrakhan Expedition 1570–1572 Ivan the Terrible’s Crimean War 1580–1762 Russian conquest of Siberia 1590–1595 Boris Godunov’s Swedish War 1606–1607 Bolotnikov Rebellion 1610–1617 Ingrian War 1632–1634 Smolensk War 1651–1653 Alexis I’s Persian War 1652–1689 Sino–Russian border conflicts 1654–1667 First Northern War 1656–1658 Second Northern War 1670–1671 Razin’s Rebellion 1676–1681 Feodor III’s Turkish War 1683–1700 Great Turkish War 1700–1721 Great Northern War 1704–1711 Third Bashkir Rebellion 1707–1708 Bulavin Rebellion 1717 Peter the Great’s Khivan War 1717–1847 Kazakh-Russian conflicts Russian Empire (1721–1917) 1722–1723 Persian Expedition of Peter the Great 1733–1738 War of the Polish Succession Rhineland 1735–1739 Russo-Austro-Turkish War 1735–1740 Fourth Bashkir Rebellion 1740–1748 War of the Austrian Succession 1756–1763 Seven Years' War 1768–1769 Koliivshchyna Rebellion 1768–1772 War of the Bar Confederation 1768–1774 Catherine the Great’s First Turkish War 1773–1775 Pugachev's Rebellion 1787–1792 Catherine the Great’s Second Turkish War 1788–1790 Catherine the Great’s Swedish War 1792 Catherine the Great’s Polish War, Second Partition of Poland 1794 Kościuszko Uprising, Third Partition of Poland 1796 Persian Expedition of Catherine the Great 1804–1813 Alexander I’s Persian War 1806–1812 Alexander I’s Turkish War 1808–1809 Finnish War 1817–1864 Caucasian War 1826–1828 Nicholas I’s Persian War 1828–1829 Nicholas I’s Turkish War 1830–1831 November uprising, crushed Polish uprising. 1839–1841 Second Turko-Egyptian War 1839–1895 Russian conquest of Central Asia 1863–1864 January uprising, crushed Polish, Lithuanian and Ukrainian insurgents uprising. 1899–1901 Boxer Rebellion, Results speak themselves with Imperial Russia/Russian Federation having the largest land area in the world! Soviet Union (1922–1991) 1924 August Uprising, Consolidation of Soviet rule in Georgian SSR 1924 Tatarbunary Uprising, Crushing of the Soviet-inspired rebellion. 1925–1926 Urtatagai conflict, 1929 Sino-Soviet conflict, USSR defeats China 1929 Red Army intervention in Afghanistan, USSR defeated. 1930 Red Army intervention in Afghanistan (1930), USSR defeats Basmachi. 1932–1941 Soviet–Japanese border conflicts, USSR defeats Imperial Japan. 1936–1939 Spanish Civil War, USSR-backed proxy has been defeated. 1937 Islamic Rebellion in Xinjiang, USSR's backed proxy defeats China. 1939 Invasion of Poland (Part of World War II), triggering WW2. Division of Polish territory between Third Reich, Soviet Union and Slovakia 1939–1940 Winter War (Part of World War II), USSR defeats Finland. 1940 Occupation of the Baltic states(Part of World War II), Occupation of the Baltic states by the Red Army 1940 Soviet occupation of Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina(Part of World War II), Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina annexed to the USSR, creation of the Moldovan SSR. 1944–1956 Guerrilla war in the Baltic states, USSR defeats Ukrainian Insurgent Army 1945 Soviet–Japanese War(Part of World War II), USSR defeats Imperial Japan. Karafuto Prefecture is annexed by the Soviet Union and incorporated into Sakhalin Oblast. Kuril Islands annexed to the Soviet Union 1953 East German Uprising, Soviet Union crushed East German demonstrators. 1968 Invasion of Czechoslovakia, Soviet military presence in Czechoslovakia until 1991. 1969 Zhenbao Island Incidentm, USSR defeats China. 1974–1991 Eritrean War of Independence, USSR's proxy defeated. 1975–1991 Angolan Civil War, Independence of Namibia 1977–1978 Ethio-Somali War. Somalia broke all ties with Soviet Union. 1979–1989 Soviet–Afghan War, Failed Soviet attempt to quell Afghan Mujahedeen insurgency Russian Federation (1991-present) 1991–1993 Georgian Civil War, Zviadist revolt crushed. 1991–1993 War in Abkhazia, Russian-backed Abkhazia gained de facto independence from Georgia. 1992 Transnistria War, Russian- Transnistria gained de facto independence from Moldova. 1992 East Prigorodny Conflict, Expulsion of ethnic Ingush from Prigorodny by Ossetian militia 2008 Russo-Georgian War, Expansion of Russain backed Abkhazia and South Ossetia at the expense of Georgia. 2014–present Russo-Ukrainian War, Russian annexation of Crimea 2018–present Central African Republic Civil War, Ongoing.
    1
  10810. 1
  10811.  @bodryy_vecher  From Britannica about Imperialism imperialism, state policy, practice, or advocacy of extending power and dominion, especially by direct territorial acquisition or by gaining political and economic control of other areas. Because it always involves the use of power, whether military or economic or some subtler form, imperialism has often been considered morally reprehensible, and the term is frequently employed in international propaganda to denounce and discredit an opponent’s foreign policy. Imperialism in ancient times is clear in the history of China and in the history of western Asia and the Mediterranean—an unending succession of empires. The tyrannical empire of the Assyrians was replaced (6th–4th century BCE) by that of the Persians, in strong contrast to the Assyrian in its liberal treatment of subjected peoples, assuring it long duration. It eventually gave way to the imperialism of Greece. When Greek imperialism reached an apex under Alexander the Great (356–323 BCE), a union of the eastern Mediterranean with western Asia was achieved. But the cosmopolis, in which all citizens of the world would live harmoniously together in equality, remained a dream of Alexander. It was partially realized when the Romans built their empire from Britain to Egypt. This idea of empire as a unifying force was never again realized after the fall of Rome. The nations arising from the ashes of the Roman Empire in Europe, and in Asia on the common basis of Islamic civilization (see Islamic world), pursued their individual imperialist policies. Imperialism became a divisive force among the peoples of the world.
    1
  10812. 1
  10813. 1
  10814. 1
  10815. 1
  10816. 1
  10817. 1
  10818. 1
  10819. 1
  10820. 1
  10821. 1
  10822. 1
  10823. 1
  10824. 1
  10825. 1
  10826. 1
  10827. 1
  10828. 1
  10829. 1
  10830. 1
  10831. 1
  10832. 1
  10833. 1
  10834. 1
  10835. 1
  10836. 1
  10837. 1
  10838. 1
  10839. 1
  10840. 1
  10841. 1
  10842. 1
  10843. 1
  10844. 1
  10845. 1
  10846. 1
  10847. 1
  10848. 1
  10849. 1
  10850. 1
  10851. Before Euromaidan, Russia started a trade war against Ukraine, forcing Yanukovych to sign a base rental extension agreement that breached Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 disallows foreign military bases after 2017. Read the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 which disallows foreign military bases after 2017. CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on 28 June 1996 Article 17 The location of foreign military bases shall not be permitted on the territory of Ukraine. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17. After 2017, Ukraine's constitution is incompatible with foreign military bases hosting either NATO or CSTO. If Yanukovych didn't sign the military base rental extension, Russia would be kicked out of Crimea. Putin's narrative is FALSE. Putin's pressure caused Yanukovych to make a mistake. ----- Every country has the right to operate a biolab and Ukraine did NOT invade another country. Basic pathology blood test requires a bio lab. Saddam's Iraq invaded two other countries i.e. Kuwait and Iran. Remember, Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum exchanged Ukraine's nuclear WMD for security assurances from US, UK, and Russia. France and China signed a watered-down Budapest Memorandum. Budapest Memorandum requires Ukraine to join Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty as part of Ukraine's nuclear WMD disarmament. Tucker is ignorant of Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum. Did you know Australia has similar security assurances like Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum and Australia does NOT have a NATO Article V level guarantee with the US? From 1950 to the 1960s, Australia detonated nuclear bombs as a joint partner with the UK. Australia has many Biolabs for agriculture, animal health, human health and 'etc'. -----
    1
  10852. 1
  10853. 1
  10854. 1
  10855. 1
  10856. 1
  10857. 1
  10858. 1
  10859. 1
  10860. 1
  10861. 1
  10862. 1
  10863. 1
  10864. 1
  10865. 1
  10866. 1
  10867. 1
  10868. 1
  10869. 1
  10870. 1
  10871. 1
  10872. 1
  10873. 1
  10874. 1
  10875. 1
  10876. 1
  10877. 1
  10878. 1
  10879. 1
  10880. 1
  10881. 1
  10882. 1
  10883. 1
  10884. 1
  10885. 1
  10886. 1
  10887. 1
  10888. 1
  10889. 1
  10890. 1
  10891. 1
  10892. 1
  10893. 1
  10894. 1
  10895. 1
  10896. 1
  10897. 1
  10898. 1
  10899. 1
  10900. 1
  10901. 1
  10902. 1
  10903. 1
  10904. 1
  10905. 1
  10906. 1
  10907. 1
  10908. 1
  10909. 1
  10910. 1
  10911. 1
  10912. 1
  10913. 1
  10914. 1
  10915. 1
  10916. 1
  10917. 1
  10918. 1
  10919. 1
  10920. 1
  10921. 1
  10922. 1
  10923. 1
  10924. 1
  10925. 1
  10926. 1
  10927. 1
  10928. 1
  10929. 1
  10930. 1
  10931. 1
  10932. 1
  10933. 1
  10934. 1
  10935. 1
  10936. 1
  10937. 1
  10938. 1
  10939. 1
  10940. 1
  10941. 1
  10942. 1
  10943. 1
  10944. 1
  10945. 1
  10946. 1
  10947. 1
  10948. 1
  10949. 1
  10950. 1
  10951. 1
  10952.  @SergioLeon-e2e  The Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority-governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country".[8] In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical.
    1
  10953. 1
  10954. 1
  10955. 1
  10956. 1
  10957. 1
  10958. 1
  10959. 1
  10960. 1
  10961. 1
  10962. 1
  10963. 1
  10964. 1
  10965. 1
  10966. 1
  10967. 1
  10968. 1
  10969. 1
  10970. 1
  10971. 1
  10972.  @julianpetkov8320  Meanwhile, to date the RAAF’s AU-1 and -2 have flown almost 1,100 flight hours in 700 sorties, Over said. They’re flying at about the utilisation rate that a mature weapon system like F-16s or F-18s are returning at_ So the airplanes have really been performing remarkably well”_ F-35 System Design and Development (SDD) is on track to be finalised by the end of the year, Over said, with a last three per cent of all SDD test points to be completed “Right now the development program is rapidly winding to a close. We’re within three per cent of the testing to complete the development program and we’re in the final stages of tweaking the Block 3F software that will be pushed to the field later this year,” Over said “The full functional capability that we’ve promised with Block 3F is actually flying in [flight test] jets right now and so it’s identifying the things that don’t work quite as the pilots would like for them to work and we’re tweaking through those last little details now” ---------- Keeping the F-35 Ahead of the Bad Guys by John A. Tirpak March 2019 <snip...> Although the F-35 can carry the new Long-Range Anti-Ship Missile, or LRASM, externally, Winter said the principal new anti-ship missiles coming in Block 4 are the JSOW C1 for the Navy and the Norwegian JSM. The program has “not been asked” about whether the stealthy LRASM can fit inside the F-35’s weapon bays, he said, nor has the Navy asked to integrate the SLAM-ER (Standoff Land Attack Missile-Extended Range) version of the Harpoon anti-ship missile. <...> Last October, then-Defense Secretary Jim Mattis directed the Air Force to increase mission capable rates for the F-22, F-16, and F-35 to at least 80 percent. At the time, the F-35 rate was 54 percent overall, but for 3F aircraft recently off the production line, the rate was better than 80 percent. Winter agreed that spare parts are the “long pole in the tent” for getting the F-35 fleet up to the 80 percent standard. “We have initiatives underway to increase spare parts production,” he said, including accelerating the rate at which parts can be repaired by the F-35 depot at Hill AFB, Utah. This will allow industry to concentrate on making more new parts, rather than fixing older ones, he said. The Air Force has until Sept. 30 to achieve the 80 percent mission capable rate, assuming the order stands under Acting Defense Secretary Patrick M. Shanahan or his successor. <...> -------- "but for 3F aircraft recently off the production line, the rate was better than 80 percent"
    1
  10973. 1
  10974. 1
  10975. 1
  10976. 1
  10977. 1
  10978. 1
  10979. 1
  10980. 1
  10981. 1
  10982. 1
  10983. 1
  10984. 1
  10985. 1
  10986. 1
  10987. 1
  10988. 1
  10989. 1
  10990. 1
  10991. 1
  10992. 1
  10993. 1
  10994. 1
  10995. 1
  10996. 1
  10997. 1
  10998. 1
  10999. 1
  11000. 1
  11001. 1
  11002. 1
  11003. 1
  11004. 1
  11005. 1
  11006. 1
  11007. 1
  11008. 1
  11009. 1
  11010. 1
  11011. 1
  11012. 1
  11013. 1
  11014. 1
  11015. 1
  11016. 1
  11017. 1
  11018. 1
  11019. 1
  11020. 1
  11021. 1
  11022. 1. It's well known China has attempted to encircle Australia via the second Island chain. China has no business in Australia's Oceania backyard. 2. It's well known China's navy ships has surveyed the East Philippines Sea that is a backup route when South China China / West Philippines Sea is blocked by China. Australia's place in any conflict between the US and China is enforcing Australia's freedom of navigation and keeping its shipping lanes open to support its northern allies. Refer to Australia-Japan "Defence Supplies and Services" agreement. Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of Japan concerning Reciprocal Provision of Supplies and Services between the Australian Defence Force and the Self-Defense Forces of Japan - Sydney, 14 January 2017 Obligations 3.14 The provision of any supplies and services under the proposed Agreement must be carried out in accordance with the Parties’ respective national laws and obligations. 3.15 Article I provides that the reciprocal provision of logistic supplies and services under the proposed Agreement will occur for the purposes of: exercises and training with participation by both the ADF and the JSDF; United Nations peacekeeping operations, internationally coordinated peacekeeping and security operations, and humanitarian international relief operations; operations in response to large scale disasters in Australia, Japan or a third country; emergency evacuation of Australian or Japanese nationals, or others from third countries; communication and coordination or other routine activities including visits of ships or aircraft of the ADF or the JSDF;and for other cooperative efforts as mutually determined and permitted under the laws and regulations of the respective Parties (including for unforeseen circumstances or exigencies). 3.16 The inclusion of ‘internationally coordinated peacekeeping and security operations’ as well as enabling the provision of logistic supplies and services for other cooperatively efforts as mutually determined is an expansion of the 2013 Agreement. 3.17 The supplies and services that may be provided under the Agreement are listed in Tabled 3.1 below. 3.18 For the provision of supplies, where possible, the receiving Party must return the supplies in a condition and manner satisfactory to the providing Party. Where supplies cannot be returned in a satisfactory condition or are consumable, the receiving Party must give the providing Party supplies of the same type, quality and quantity. Where neither option is possible, the receiving Party must reimburse the providing Party. 3.19 For the provision of services, the receiving Party may either reimburse the providing Party or provide services of the same type and equivalent value. 3.20 The provision of supplies and services must be carried out in accordance with the Procedural Arrangement as agreed between the Australian Department of Defence and the Japanese Ministry of Defence (Article V). The NIA explains that a new Procedural Arrangement has been concluded however is a less-than-treaty status document. Consequently, the Committee will not have an opportunity to review this supporting document. 3.21 Similarly, disputes between the Australia and Japan must be settled in accordance with the Procedural Arrangement, or otherwise through consultation. Reasons for implementing proposed treaty action 3.22 As noted above, the proposal to replace the 2013 Agreement was initiated by Japan, which sought to broaden that Agreement to achieve congruence with defence reforms passed by the National Diet in September 2015. 3.23 The NIA states that the expanded scope of the proposed Agreement: aligns with Australia’s other military logistic support agreements and arrangements and offers Australia the opportunity to further enhance the quality of, and potential for, defence cooperation with Japan, and to broaden the interoperability between the two forces. 3.24 It further asserts that the proposed Agreement is ‘uncontroversial’ and ‘builds on Australia’s existing relationship with Japan in relation to defence matters, and raises no international defence policy issues’. 3.25 If the proposed Agreement were not ratified, Australia’s military logistic relationship with Japan would be out of step with those that Japan has with the United States and the United Kingdom.
    1
  11023. 1
  11024. 1
  11025. 1
  11026. 1
  11027. 1
  11028.  @05Rudey  UK delivered Nazi Germany's 1st defeat during the Battle of Britain with the UK achieving local air and maintaining maritime superiority. The main reason for Germany's attack on Russia is Germany's running out of oil issue since the UK's maritime power blockaded trade with Middle East oil countries and the US refusing oil trade with Germany. Continued WW2 conflict will lead to the US dropping the nuclear bomb on Nazi Germany. USA production is more than 4 times since the US was the only nation to mass-produced aircraft carriers. Germany Tiger I tank's 1,347 units x 44 tons = 59,268 tons Tiger II tank has 492 units x 68 tons = 33,456 tons Panther tank has 6000 units x 44 tons = 264,000 tons Panzer IV has 8,553 unit x 25 tons = 213,825 tons Total: 570,549 tons Czech's Panzer 38(t) has 1414 units x 10 tons = 141,40 tons USA M26 tanks has 2,212 units x 44 tons = 97,328 tons M26 has 90 mm gun. M4 tanks has 49,234 units x 33 tons = 1,624,722, Russian T34 tanks has similar number. M10 tank destroyer has 6,406 units x 29 tons = 185,774 tons M18 tank destroyer has 2,507 units x 39 tons = 97,773 tons M36 tank destroyer has 2,324 units x 29 tons = 67,396 tons M36 has 90 mm gun. Sub-Total: 2,072,993 tons M4 Sherman Firefly (UK) has 2,200 units x 35 tons = 77,000 tons. Firefly takes on Tiger I and Panther tanks. The US has both quality (M26) and numbers (M4). A significant amount of the US Army's tonnage was against the German army. The US has the following aircraft carrier production 24 Essex-class fleet carriers with 90 to 110 aircraft each. 650,400 tons for Essex-class. 21 Commencement Bay class with 228,900 tons 50 Casablanca-class with 390,000 tons. 45 Bogue-class with 747,900 tons 3 Yorktown-class fleet carriers with 59,400 tons Sub-Total: 3,798,645 tons Modern-day USN aircraft carrier tonnage is just about 1,460,000 tons. A significant amount of USN's tonnage was against the Japanese navy. WW2 UK has similar aircraft carrier builds as Imperial Japan i.e. around 10 to 11 units. Not including UK, US and Canada other surface combat ships e.g. destroyers, heavy cruisers, battleships and 'etc'. Grand Total: 5,871,638 tons For the US, that's already 10.3X times over Germany's iron/steel tonnage extract/production. WW2 Russian navy is small. WW2 German navy is small. Both Canada and the USA has the advantage of the entire North American continent on raw metal and oil resources. European mainland is raw resource-poor, hence the reason for Hitler wanting Russian lands. 1st of the super aircraft carrier USS Midway (CV-41) entered service on 10 September 1945 which is eight days after the Surrender of Japan. The US almost single handily defeats Imperial Japan. In terms of warship numbers, Canada created the second-largest navy in the world after US, while Australia created the 4th largest airforce in the world. Both Canada and Australia have raw material strength from their respective continents.
    1
  11029. 1
  11030. 1
  11031.  @vlad_47  UK delivered Nazi Germany's 1st defeat during the Battle of Britain with the UK achieving local air and maintaining maritime superiority. Both Imperial Japanese navy and British Royal Navy has constructed about 11 aircraft carrier fleet. USA production is more than 4 times since the US was the only nation to mass-produced aircraft carriers. Germany Tiger I tank's 1,347 units x 44 tons = 59,268 tons Tiger II tank has 492 units x 68 tons = 33,456 tons Panther tank has 6000 units x 44 tons = 264,000 tons Panzer IV has 8,553 unit x 25 tons = 213,825 tons Total: 570,549 tons Czech's Panzer 38(t) has 1414 units x 10 tons = 141,40 tons USA M26 tanks has 2,212 units x 44 tons = 97,328 tons M26 has 90 mm gun. M4 tanks has 49,234 units x 33 tons = 1,624,722, Soviet T34 tanks has similar numbers and tonnage. M10 tank destroyer has 6,406 units x 29 tons = 185,774 tons M18 tank destroyer has 2,507 units x 39 tons = 97,773 tons M36 tank destroyer has 2,324 units x 29 tons = 67,396 tons M36 has 90 mm gun. Sub-Total: 2,072,993 tons M4 Sherman Firefly (UK) has 2,200 units x 35 tons = 77,000 tons. Firefly takes on Tiger I and Panther tanks. The US has both quality (M26) and numbers (M4). A significant amount of the US Army's tonnage was against the German army. The US has the following aircraft carrier production 24 Essex-class fleet carriers with 90 to 110 aircraft each. 650,400 tons for Essex-class. 21 Commencement Bay class with 228,900 tons 50 Casablanca-class with 390,000 tons. 45 Bogue-class with 747,900 tons 3 Yorktown-class fleet carriers with 59,400 tons Sub-Total: 3,798,645 tons Modern-day USN aircraft carrier tonnage is just about 1,460,000 tons. A significant amount of USN's tonnage was against the Japanese navy. WW2 UK has similar aircraft carrier builds as Imperial Japan i.e. around 10 to 11 units. Not including UK, US and Canada other surface combat ships e.g. destroyers, heavy cruisers, battleships and 'etc'. Grand Total: 5,871,638 tons For the US, that's already 10.3X times over Germany's iron/steel tonnage extract/production. WW2 Russian navy is small. WW2 German navy is small. Both Canada and the USA has the advantage of the entire North American continent on raw metal and oil resources. European mainland is raw resource-poor, hence the reason for Hitler wanting Russian lands.
    1
  11032. 1
  11033. 1
  11034. 1
  11035. 1
  11036. 1
  11037. 1
  11038. 1
  11039. 1
  11040. 1
  11041. 1
  11042. 1
  11043. 1
  11044. 1
  11045. 1
  11046. 1
  11047. 1
  11048. 1
  11049. 1
  11050. 1
  11051. 1
  11052. 1
  11053. 1
  11054. 1
  11055. 1
  11056. 1
  11057. 1
  11058. 1
  11059. 1
  11060. 1
  11061. 1
  11062. 1
  11063. 1
  11064. 1
  11065. 1
  11066. 1
  11067. 1
  11068. 1
  11069. 1
  11070. 1
  11071. 1
  11072. 1
  11073. 1
  11074. 1
  11075. 1
  11076. 1
  11077. 1
  11078. 1
  11079. 1
  11080. 1
  11081.  @EmperorLionflame  Wrong. Original source (non-English) http://suomenkuvalehti.fi/jutut/kotimaa/suomella-vahvat-ilmavoimat-mutta-kuinka-kauan/ Frisian Flag 2012 exercises in Holland, Finnish F-18Cs gets 100 kills and 6 loses against Eurofighter (Germany, UK), Polish new F-16 and older F-16 planes (Norway, Belgium) and Gripen (Swedish) Finland's F-18C has 16:1 kill ratio over Germany/UK's Eurofighter, Poland's F-16C Block 52+ and Norway/Belgium's F-16A MLU and Sweden's Gripen. Poland, Norway and Belgium has selected F-35A over losers in Frisian Flag 2012. ----------- http://www.f-16.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=5525&start=1335#wrapper From GTA4's post, F-35A beating EuroFighter in acceleration. https://hushkit.net/2015/12/18/typhoon-versus-rafale-the-final-word/ Both Rafale and EuroFighter has similar angle of attack limits. For Rafale http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/flight-test-dassault-rafale-rampant-rafale-334383/ The DFCS is a "g" demand system with +9.0g/29° angle of attack (AoA) limit in air-to-air mode and +5.5g/20° AoA limit in both of the two air-to-ground/heavy stores modes (ST1 and ST2) to cater for forward or aft centre of gravity For F-35 http://www.f-16.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=15013&start=210 Article copied beyond Aviation Week paywall. So it got stuck at 60 or 70 deg. alpha, and it was as happy as could be Classic Hornet can sustain 45 degress angle of attack. Beyond 45 degress, Hornet would be out of control. F-16 Vista with thrust vector control can sustain 90 degress angle of attack. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dj8OJs6E3JM F-35A can sustain 60 to 70 degress angle of attack. Software limited to 50 degress angle of attack. https://www.reddit.com/r/F35Lightning/comments/8a66ta/out_of_the_shadows_rnlaf_experiences_with_the/ Out Of The Shadows: RNLAF experiences with the F-35A - Combat Aircraft Magazine May 2018 1. Dutch F-35 Block 3F, "F-35 sits somewhere in between the F-16 and F/A-18 when it comes to within visual range manoeuvring'". 2. Lightest empty weight F-16A MLU air-superority model needs to be clean (no weapons, no external tanks) to make visual range dogfight interesting against combat loaded F-35A Block 3F. 3. Dutch has acknowledge early F-35 Block builds being beaten by F-16s which changed with F-35A Block 3F build. http://nettsteder.regjeringen.no/kampfly/2015/11/20/a-fly-f-35-erfaringer-fra-den-forste-uka/ More F-16 vs F-35 from Norwegian pilot. I quote Overall, flying the F-35 reminds me a bit of flying the F/A-18 Hornet, but with an important difference: It has been fitted with a turbo http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2009/07/i-flew-supersonic-barely-at-th/ F-35C has 300 degrees per second roll rate. F-35A roll rate: 300 deg/sec. Video proof. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qceZALofOcg&feature=youtu.be&t=1m15s http://theaviationist.com/2015/05/01/aileron-roll-in-t-346a/ According to most reports a Rafale features a maximum roll rate of 270 deg/s, the Eurofighter Typhoon is able of around 250 deg/s, the F/A-18E Super Hornet has a maximum roll rate of 120 deg/s whereas the F-16 can roll at 240 deg/s. Try again.
    1
  11082. 1
  11083. Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq ------ Try again.
    1
  11084. 1
  11085. 1
  11086. 1
  11087. 1
  11088. 1
  11089. 1
  11090. 1
  11091.  @PlaYer-sn5or  Against Cairo Declaration. Refer to Chiang Kai-Shek Supplementing The Act Of Surrender 1945 excluded Manchuria, Formosa, and French Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude. Order Of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-Shek Supplementing The Act Of Surrender 1945 This is order No. 1 of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek to the Japanese forces in China, excluding Manchuria, Formosa, and French Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude, which were surrendered under the act of 9 September 1945. This order supplements the acts of surrender to the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers and his General Order No. 1. ----- There are opposing views on the legality of the KMT takeover of Taiwan. The Chinese Communist government maintains to this day that the Republic of China on Taiwan is a province that must eventually return to rule by the mainland. According to an article published in 1955 on the legal status of Taiwan, "It has been charged that Chiang Kai-shek has no claim to the island because he is 'merely a fugitive quartering his army' there and besides, his is a government in exile." Moreover, the Treaty of San Francisco, which was officially signed by 48 nations on 8 September 1951, did not specify to whom Japan was ceding Taiwan and the Pescadores. Despite this, the ROC was viewed by the vast majority of states at the time as the legitimate representative of China, as it had succeeded the Qing Dynasty, while the PRC was at the time a mostly unrecognized state. Japan was, at the time of the signing of the Treaty of San Francisco, still technically under American occupation. After full independence, Japan established full relations with the ROC and not the PRC. According to Professor Gene Hsiao, "since the San Francisco Peace Treaty and the separate KMT treaty with Japan did not specify to whom Japan was ceding Taiwan and the Pescadores, the implication of the U.S. position was that legally, and insofar as the signatories of those two treaties were concerned, Taiwan became an 'ownerless' island and the KMT, by its own assent to the American policy, a foreign government-in-exile." Technically, KMT is a foreign government in exile under the American occupation of Japanese Taiwan islands.
    1
  11092. 1
  11093. 1
  11094. 1
  11095. 1
  11096. 1
  11097. 1
  11098. 1
  11099. 1
  11100. 1
  11101. 1
  11102. 1
  11103. 1
  11104. 1
  11105. 1
  11106. 1
  11107. 1
  11108. 1
  11109. 1
  11110. 1
  11111. 1
  11112. 1
  11113. 1
  11114. 1
  11115. 1
  11116. 1
  11117. 1
  11118. 1
  11119. 1
  11120. 1
  11121. 1
  11122. 1
  11123. 1
  11124. 1
  11125. 1
  11126. 1
  11127. 1
  11128. 1
  11129. 1
  11130. 1
  11131. 1
  11132. 1
  11133. 1
  11134. 1
  11135. 1
  11136. 1
  11137. 1
  11138. 1
  11139. 1
  11140. 1
  11141. 1
  11142. 1
  11143. 1
  11144. 1
  11145. 1
  11146. 1
  11147. 1
  11148. 1
  11149. 1
  11150. 1
  11151. 1
  11152. 1
  11153.  @nathannataatmadja3349  At the lowest point in the Philippines and the US relationship, the Philippines lost territory to China. Feelings are useless without firepower to back them. China's action on Mischief Reef started around 1995, shortly after the US navy left Clark airbase in Subic. ---- China blocked Australia's and New Zealand's marine park proposals in Antarctica. It is the eighth year the proposal has been knocked back, with China and Russia voting the proposal down on previous occasions. This caused Australia to enlist help from the EU while New Zealand enlist help from the US. -------- The Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng) were a series of military campaigns launched by the Qing dynasty of China in the mid–late 18th century during the reign of the Qianlong Emperor (r. 1735–1796). President Xi's argument is based on historical Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng). They included three to enlarge the area of Qing control in Inner Asia: two against the Dzungars (1755–1757) and the "pacification" of Xinjiang (1758–1759). The other seven campaigns were more in the nature of police actions on frontiers already established: two wars to suppress the Gyalrong of Jinchuan, Sichuan, another to suppress the Taiwanese Aboriginals (1787–88), and four expeditions abroad against the Burmese (1765–1769), the Vietnamese (1788–1789), and the Gurkhas on the border between Tibet and Nepal (1790–1792), with the last counting as two. Faced with a powerful China in the northeast and a resurgent Siam in the southeast, Burma's King Bodawpaya and his army invaded eastern territories of India, hence bringing the rising British East India Company into the fray which defeated the Kingdom of Burma. British East India Company is allied with mostly Hindu Maratha Empire. President Xi's argument is based on historical Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng). There's nothing new under the sun.
    1
  11154. 1
  11155. 1
  11156. 1
  11157. 1
  11158. 1
  11159.  @kosakata8632  >You misunderstood what EU afraid of about indonesia, jokowi plan is not only blocking resources but block all EU motorized industries by creating local cheaper electric motors and it's components. 1. You are assuming natural growth without large-scale immigration. USMCA blocking UK's entry its trade zone shows near defacto custom union. CPTPP member countries (e.g. Japan, Australia) have welcomed the UK. UK's entry attempt into the USMCA zone needs the agreement from its three member countries. The US has expanded its EU-style monetary union into South America e.g. El Salvador and Ecuador. 2. You failed to understand is that the EU (with 446 million population) is a protectionist customs union with a common currency and a common reserve bank. EU has protected its automotive industries from dumping against China. The EU will not tolerate dumping into its market! 3. Rare earth is important for building power-efficient electric motors. Australia and Canada have rare earth supply advantages. 4. Reminder, Australia and Japan have a defense pact not just with the UK, hence it wouldn't be just "5 FDPA" countries. Unlike pre-WW2, Japan has signed agreements with Australia for its raw material supply. 5. When UK enters CPTPP, it would include the 7 Commonwealth countries i.e. CANZUK group (AU, NZ, CAN, UK) + Malaysia + Singapore + Brunei. When UK enters CPTPP, the trade zone would have 12 members with about 568 million population size market. CPTPP includes a governing Commission.
    1
  11160. 1
  11161. 1
  11162. 1
  11163. 1
  11164. 1
  11165. 1
  11166. 1
  11167. 1
  11168. 1
  11169. 1
  11170. 1
  11171. 1
  11172. 1
  11173. 1
  11174. 1
  11175. 1
  11176. 1
  11177. 1
  11178. 1
  11179. 1
  11180. 1
  11181. 1
  11182. 1
  11183. 1
  11184. 1
  11185. 1
  11186. 1
  11187. 1
  11188. 1
  11189. 1
  11190. 1
  11191. 1
  11192. 1
  11193. 1
  11194. 1
  11195. 1
  11196. 1
  11197. 1
  11198. 1
  11199. 1
  11200. 1
  11201. 1
  11202. 1
  11203. 1
  11204. 1
  11205. 1
  11206. 1
  11207. 1
  11208. 1
  11209. 1
  11210. 1
  11211. 1
  11212. 1
  11213. 1
  11214. 1
  11215. 1
  11216. 1
  11217. 1
  11218. 1
  11219. 1
  11220. 1
  11221. 1
  11222. 1
  11223. 1
  11224. 1
  11225. 1
  11226.  @dannybuoy138  From GPAS__2021 pdf Pension (mandated nanny state saving funds) vs GDP ratio for 2021 Five Eyes/Five Passport Group, Australia, $2,333 billion, 174.8% (CPTPP member, Nordic model), Australia's mandated large-scale savings started in the1980s under the Labor government. Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (USMCA, CPTPP member, Nordic model) United Kingdom, $3,564 billion, 135.1% (CPTPP member in July 2023, Nordic model) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (USMCA member) (I don't have data for NZ) Notice the Five Eyes group has similar pension assets to GDP ratio results Large-scale mandated savings funds enable the government to issue government bonds and large-scale bond buyer markets! EU Finland, $279 billion, 104.3% (Nordic model) France, $166 billion, 6.5% Germany, $548 billion, 14.5% Italy, $231 billion, 12.5% <----- PIIGS Netherlands, $1,900 billion, 214.4%, (Nordic model) Ireland, $197 billion, 49.4% <----- PIIGS Spain, $44 billion, 3.6% <----- PIIGS The EU lacks strategic savings coordination. Non-EU, Europe Switzerland, $1,163 billion, 164.3% (Nordic model) North America Mexico, $259 billion, 24.9% (USMCA, CPTPP member,) Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (USMCA, CPTPP member, Nordic model) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (USMCA member) South America Brazil, $195 billion,14.3% Chile, $243 billion, 99.2% (CPTPP member) East Asia, South East Asia China, $285 billion, 1.9% Hong Kong, $199 billion, 58.3% Japan, $3,613 billion, 73.6% (CPTPP member) South Korea, $968 billion, 61.0% Malaysia, $279 billion, 83.0% (CPTPP member) South-Central Asia India, $184 billion, 7.1%
    1
  11227. 1
  11228. 1
  11229. 1
  11230. 1
  11231. 1
  11232. 1
  11233. 1
  11234. 1
  11235. 1
  11236. 1
  11237. 1
  11238. 1
  11239. 1
  11240. 1
  11241. 1
  11242. 1
  11243. 1
  11244. 1
  11245. 1
  11246. 1
  11247. 1
  11248. 1
  11249. 1
  11250. 1
  11251. 1
  11252. 1
  11253. 1
  11254. 1
  11255. 1
  11256. 1
  11257. 1
  11258. @RustyBoysGaming >nothing will ever stop the CIA Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country".[8] You're a hypocrite. Sorry, the US has entered the same geopolitics as Russian Empire's and Russian-dominated USSR's geopolitics game.
    1
  11259. 1
  11260. 1
  11261. 1
  11262. 1
  11263. 1
  11264. 1
  11265. 1
  11266. 1
  11267. 1
  11268. 1
  11269. 1
  11270. 1
  11271. 1
  11272. 1
  11273. 1
  11274. 1
  11275. 1
  11276. 1
  11277. 1
  11278.  @garawa1987  News(from ABC NET AU) : Ancient virus lurking in remote Australia, affecting thousands of Aboriginal adults In a brightly lit lab in the outback town of Alice Springs, researchers have been inspecting vials of blood infected with an ancient virus that has lurked in Australia for thousands of years. It is called T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1— or HTLV-1 — and Australia has the highest levels in the world. A distant relative of HIV, it is a blood-borne virus that can be sexually transmitted or passed from mother to child. The virus can lead to inflammation of the skin, eyes and lungs. "You're also at risk of developing things like leukemia, so blood cancer, and becoming disabled through spinal cord injuries," researcher Joel Liddle said. "Once your pro-viral load is high, you're at a high risk of poor health." Researchers said, in most cases, leukaemia caused by the virus could be "rapidly fatal". Researchers from the Baker Institute for Heart and Diabetes in Alice Springs estimated 45 percent of Indigenous adults in central Australia had HTLV-1 . "In remote Australia, it's so out of sight, out of mind with a lot of things, health is just one of those things," Mr Liddle said. One of the difficulties with this virus is that most of those who have HTLV-1, don't know they have it, and a vast number of Aboriginal communities have never been tested. "I think there's probably confusion and a little bit of anger, too. People [question] why haven't they been told about this," Mr Liddle said. "There's a lot of reasons to breastfeed. Prolonged breastfeeding may be something that could be addressed but that's up to Aboriginal people to decide." For Mr Liddle, an Arrernte man, a response to high rates of HTLV-1 demands a delicate approach, with intensive education work delivered in Aboriginal languages. "I think there's a lot of work to do, certainly I think at the moment, what I see as our main thing is to engage sensitively around the issues because we're dealing with people's health, and all the things and complexities that are going on in remote communities, so we have to be really mindful of that." ------ This ancient virus is related to HIV( i.e. HTLV-1) and reduces an adult's life span. To fix this issue, non-Aboriginal R&D will be needed to cure this ancient issue, promote safe sex culture (i.e. change culture), and practise monogamy (i.e. change culture). The Aborigines are killing themselves by their own actions.
    1
  11279. 1
  11280. 1
  11281. 1
  11282. 1
  11283. 1
  11284. 1
  11285. 1
  11286. 1
  11287. 1
  11288. 1
  11289. 1
  11290. 1
  11291. 1
  11292. 1
  11293. 1
  11294. 1
  11295. 1
  11296. 1
  11297. 1
  11298. 1
  11299. 1
  11300. 1
  11301. 1
  11302.  Michael Kopischke  Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government (since its formation) had demanded from the Iraqi federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq ----- The Iraqi WMD issue is NOT yet over when Kurdish victims are suing European companies in the EU court system who sold chemicals to Saddam.
    1
  11303.  @tsubadaikhan6332  China has an anti-foreign "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" protectionist policy. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about AU's reciprocal policies. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  11304. 1
  11305. 1
  11306. 1
  11307. 1
  11308. 1
  11309. 1
  11310. 1
  11311. 1
  11312. 1
  11313. 1
  11314. 1
  11315. 1
  11316. 1
  11317. 1
  11318. 1
  11319. 1
  11320. 1
  11321. 1
  11322. 1
  11323. 1
  11324. 1
  11325. 1
  11326. 1
  11327. 1
  11328. 1
  11329. 1
  11330. 1
  11331. 1
  11332. 1
  11333. 1
  11334. 1
  11335. 1
  11336. 1
  11337. 1
  11338. 1
  11339. 1
  11340. 1
  11341. 1
  11342. 1
  11343. 1
  11344. 1
  11345. 1
  11346. 1
  11347. 1
  11348. 1
  11349. 1
  11350. 1
  11351. 1
  11352. 1
  11353. 1
  11354. 1
  11355. 1
  11356. 1
  11357. ​ @phyllismawhinney8707  The breakup of Yugoslavia is a three way contest which mirrored geopolitics from Western/Central Europe (Protestant/Catholics), Russian Empire (Russian Federation, Christian Orthodox) and Ottoman Empire (Turkey, Islam). Backgound http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1992-01-16/news/9201050384_1_croatia-cease-fire-european-nations "*The European move, and follow-up actions elsewhere, are expected to put pressure on the United States to grant recognition*, even though it has been opposed to such a step at this time. The U.S. fears that recognition could endanger the current cease-fire in the war between Serbia and Croatia and cause the war to spread to Bosnia-Herzegovina." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_Yugoslav_breakup 19 December 1991: Germany announces that it will recognize Croatia on January 15, 1992, with or without the rest of the European Community. 23 December 1991: Germany becomes the first major power to recognize Croatia and Slovenia as independent states 15 January 1992: The European Community recognizes Slovenia and Croatia. Without NATO (backed by U.S.), Germany/Austria would have done it alone and we would have another WW1 trigger i.e. Russia would have taken on Germany and Austria as in WWI. Attacks on Poland would have brought in UK which brings US. NATO and USA kept Russia in check. Support for Bosnia Musilims supports NATO member Turkey's interest. Turkey needs to be booted from NATO. The "old world" geopolitics did not disappear.
    1
  11358. 1
  11359. 1
  11360. 1
  11361. 1
  11362. 1
  11363. 1
  11364. 1
  11365. 1
  11366. 1
  11367. 1
  11368. 1
  11369. 1
  11370. 1
  11371. 1
  11372. 1
  11373. 1
  11374. 1
  11375. 1
  11376. 1
  11377. 1
  11378. 1
  11379. 1
  11380. 1
  11381. 1
  11382. 1
  11383. 1
  11384. 1
  11385. 1
  11386. 1
  11387. For around Nigeria area. Before British colonization, at the beginning of the 19th century, Usman dan Fodio led a successful jihad against the Hausa Kingdoms founding the centralised Sokoto Caliphate. The empire with Arabic as its official language grew rapidly under his rule and that of his descendants, who sent out invading armies in every direction. The vast landlocked empire connected the east with the western Sudan region and made inroads down south conquering parts of the Oyo Empire (modern-day Kwara), and advanced towards the Yoruba heartland of Ibadan, to reach the Atlantic Ocean. The territory controlled by the empire included much of modern-day northern and central Nigeria. The sultan sent out emirs to establish a suzerainty over the conquered territories and promote Islamic civilization, the emirs in turn became increasingly rich and powerful through trade and slavery. By the 1890s, the largest slave population in the world, about two million, was concentrated in the territories of the Sokoto Caliphate. The use of slave labour was extensive, especially in agriculture. ---- Woke professor Yaba Blay is racist herself when She stereotyped a certain racial group. Yaba Blay should direct her BLM BS against the governing party for the Confederate States of America (CSA) i.e. Democratic Party. Yaba Blay is a racist hypocrite. The George FLoyd debacle is on county government that governs the local Police service i.e. Democratic Party. Amy Klobuchar (Democrat) didn't prosecute the officer at the center of George Floyd's death. George Floyd's death was under the Democrat government in Minneapolis and the police department. Democrats-run city's police department failed to protect private properties that are unrelated to Floyd's death. Leftist BLM didn't focus on governing Democrats. Leftists still vote for Democrats. For the Australian context, Andrew Fisher's Labor government started the Stolen Generation in 1909.
    1
  11388. 1
  11389. 1
  11390. 1
  11391. 1
  11392.  @hueym2196  Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte has been told to drop his government’s controversial nitrogen emissions policy by Caroline van der Plas, the leader of the Farmer-Citizen Movement (BBB) who stormed to victory in regional elections last week, as the pair met for the first time since the electoral success. At van der Plas’ invitation, the meeting took place at De Landbouw restaurant in Wassenaar, an affluent suburb of The Hague on Tuesday. The BBB leader urged Rutte to admit defeat on his nitrogen emissions reduction policy which has resulted in nationwide protests among rural communities and propelled van der Plas’ party into amassing the highest number of seats in the Dutch Senate. “The support in the cabinet has more or less been canceled, and I wanted to know from him how seriously he takes this,” van der Plas told De Telegraaf about the meet. “I have expressed some serious concerns. Also about the crisis of confidence in the Netherlands, sticking to 2030, and the expropriation of farmers. I told Rutte: just take it out, that will give you peace of mind,” she added. The BBB leader revealed she would soon be taking her opposition to the Dutch government’s plans to Brussels, telling reporters she will schedule a call with EU Commissioner Frans Timmermans imminently. “In Europe, the basic rules are laid down. Timmermans has already indicated that there is some movement on how Europe can help the Netherlands get rid of the nitrogen lock. I am now going back to the office to make an appointment with him,” she added. Rutte offered little to the press following the meeting, claiming the pair had a “good” and “nice conversation.” The heavy defeat of his four-party coalition government has thrown the emissions plans into jeopardy, and the minor Christian Democratic Appeal has already called for change. Party leader Wopke Hoekstra suggested on Friday his party would propose adjustments to cabinet policy, and on Tuesday morning, party colleague Pieter Heerma also called for a government reversal.
    1
  11393. 1
  11394. 1
  11395. 1
  11396. 1
  11397. 1
  11398. 1
  11399. 1
  11400. 1
  11401. 1
  11402. 1
  11403. 1
  11404. 1
  11405. 1
  11406. 1
  11407. 1
  11408. 1
  11409. 1
  11410. 1
  11411. 1
  11412. 1
  11413. 1
  11414. 1
  11415. 1
  11416. 1
  11417. 1
  11418. 1
  11419. 1
  11420. 1
  11421. 1
  11422. 1
  11423. 1
  11424. 1
  11425. 1
  11426. 1
  11427. 1
  11428. 1
  11429.  @dailynhicks2731  >Ukraine is just an excuse, it is between USA and Russia, why should other countries suffer. FALSE. Soviet–Ukrainian War occurred between 1917 to 1921, a war between the Ukrainian People's Republic vs the Bolsheviks i.e. Ukrainian Soviet Republic and Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (modern-day Russian Federation). Ukrainian People's Republic is the modern-day Ukraine. This is an "old world" issue. For Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum context, Russia, the US, and the UK confirmed their Ukraine becoming parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and effectively abandoning their nuclear arsenal to Russia and that they would: 1. Respect Ukrainian independence and sovereignty in the existing borders. 2. Refrain from the threat or the use of force against Ukraine. 3. Refrain from using economic pressure on Ukraine to influence their politics. 4. Seek immediate Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine if they "should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used". 5. Refrain from the use of nuclear arms against Ukraine. 6. Consult with one another if questions arise regarding those commitments. China and France gave somewhat weaker individual assurances in separate documents. US and UK are fulfilling points 4 and 6 in accordance with Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum. Budapest Memorandum's security assurances are weaker than NATO's Article V and EU's Article 42.7. Are you arguing for the US to abandon the Budapest Memorandum?
    1
  11430. 1
  11431. 1
  11432. 1
  11433. 1
  11434. 1
  11435. 1
  11436. 1
  11437. 1
  11438. 1
  11439. 1
  11440. 1
  11441. 1
  11442. 1
  11443. 1
  11444. 1
  11445. 1
  11446. 1
  11447. 1
  11448. 1
  11449. 1
  11450. 1
  11451. 1
  11452. 1
  11453. 1
  11454. 1
  11455. 1
  11456. 1
  11457. 1
  11458. 1
  11459. 1
  11460. 1
  11461. 1
  11462. 1
  11463. 1
  11464. 1
  11465. 1
  11466. 1
  11467. 1
  11468. 1
  11469. 1
  11470. 1
  11471. 1
  11472. 1
  11473. 1
  11474. 1
  11475. 1
  11476. 1
  11477. 1
  11478. 1
  11479. 1
  11480. 1
  11481. 1
  11482. 1
  11483. 1
  11484. 1
  11485. 1
  11486. 1
  11487. 1
  11488. 1
  11489. 1
  11490. 1
  11491. Successful Tests For Lockheed Martin GMLRS In Jamming Environment Date: Nov 28, 2007 Lockheed Martin [LMT] says it recently successfully conducted two anti-jamming Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (GMLRS) Unitary rocket Phase II Product Qualification Test flights at White Sands Missile Range, N.M. These GPS2 jamming tests demonstrated both GMLRS rocket performance while in a GPS jamming environment at long range, as well as how the warhead functioned using the Point Detonating fuze within the jamming environment. All tests objectives were achieved. “Throughout the process to achieve these milestones, the highest levels in the Department of the Army, the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the Joint Staff have recognized the outstanding success of the GMLRS program,” Lt. Col. Mark Pincoski, U.S. Army product manager, Precision Guided Missiles and Rockets, said in a statement issued by Lockheed Martin. The two missions were fired from the HIMARS launcher using one rocket per mission after the launch pod container was conditioned to the hot temperature extreme, the company said. The first rocket employed the GMLRS vertical trajectory shaping software that allows the rocket to impact the target vertically, while the second incorporated the nominal trajectory shaping software, which allows for the standard ballistic trajectory flight pattern. Both rockets flew their expected trajectories and functioned as designed in the target area. Al Duchesne, director of Missile and Rocket Programs at Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control, said: “These tests validated a very tough requirement. This means that GMLRS Unitary can be effectively and productively employed every time–when low collateral damage is a concern and in close proximity to friendly troops–given its surgical precision.” The tests further qualified the effects of the unitary warhead on the target following detonation, and continued to demonstrate that the Follow-On configuration hardware and software design complies with the program objectives and requirements, the statement said. “This mission specifically demonstrated rocket performance and provided system performance data in a GPS jamming environment,” Pincoski said.
    1
  11492. 1
  11493. 1
  11494. 1
  11495. 1
  11496. 1
  11497. 1
  11498. 1
  11499. 1
  11500.  @duckmanone5435  The Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng) were a series of military campaigns launched by the Qing dynasty of China in the mid–late 18th century during the reign of the Qianlong Emperor (r. 1735–1796). They included three to enlarge the area of Qing control in Inner Asia: two against the Dzungars (1755–1757) and the "pacification" of Xinjiang (1758–1759). The other seven campaigns were more in the nature of police actions on frontiers already established: two wars to suppress the Gyalrong of Jinchuan, Sichuan, another to suppress the Taiwanese Aboriginals (1787–88), and four expeditions abroad against the Burmese (1765–1769), the Vietnamese (1788–1789), and the Gurkhas on the border between Tibet and Nepal (1790–1792), with the last counting as two. President Xi's argument is based on historical Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns. Territorial disputes around Xi's China are based on Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns. During the 4th Sino-Burmese Wars starting in 1768, Imperial China invaded the Kingdom of Burma. Burma hired European musketeers and gunners, hence Burma allied itself with the rising French Empire against Imperial China's invasion. Imperial China's imperialist conquest led to kinetic engagement with other powers. Look in the mirror. ----- Picking on the Britsh is flawed when the UK lost the British Empire. The British Empire does NOT exist. Both China and Russia are the two surviving "old world" imperial empires that largely preserved their imperial land territories. China and Russia think that communism clean slate of their imperialist colonial past.
    1
  11501.  @duckmanone5435  Before Euromaidan, Russia started a trade war against Ukraine, forcing Yanukovych to sign a base rental extension agreement that breached Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 disallows foreign military bases after 2017. Read the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 which disallows foreign military bases after 2017. CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on 28 June 1996 Article 17 The location of foreign military bases shall not be permitted on the territory of Ukraine. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17. After 2017, Ukraine's constitution is incompatible with foreign military bases hosting either NATO or CSTO. If Yanukovych didn't sign the military base rental extension, Russia would be kicked out of Crimea. Putin's narrative is FALSE. Putin's pressure caused Yanukovych to make a mistake. Look in the mirror. Your argument about the Minsk Peace Agreements of 2014 is meaningless when Russia executed old-school imperialist land grabbing five Oblast from Ukraine. The peaceful method is to execute targeted refugee policies just as Australia/UK/Canada/NZ did when your fellow BRICS member South African government prosecuted the White farmers. The US, UK, and Russia signed Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum that traded Ukraine's nuclear weapons for security assurances. Russia has exited Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum. France and China have signed a watered-down Budapest Memorandum. US, UK, and France are "respecting" Ukraine's territorial integrity and support "security assurance" for Ukraine and you can't say the same for Russia.
    1
  11502. 1
  11503. 1
  11504. 1
  11505. 1
  11506. 1
  11507. 1
  11508. 1
  11509. 1
  11510. 1
  11511. 1
  11512. 1
  11513. 1
  11514. 1
  11515. 1
  11516. 1
  11517. 1
  11518. 1
  11519. 1
  11520. 1
  11521. 1
  11522.  @ozymandiasnullifidian5590  Report: Saudi Arabia Presses U.S. on Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Date: January 19, 1992 From AP NEWS NEW YORK (AP) _ Saudi Arabia is pressuring the Bush administration to secretly arm and give intelligence to Iraqi opposition forces so they can work to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a newspaper reported Sunday. The Saudis want the United States to give arms and intelligence to Kurdish rebels in north Iraq, Shiite Muslim fighters in the south and Sunni Muslim opposition forces in central Iraq, the Times said, quoting U.S. and allied officials it didn’t name. ----- Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq
    1
  11523. 1
  11524. 1
  11525. 1
  11526. 1
  11527. 1
  11528. 1
  11529. 1
  11530.  @fitchjoe1865  Against CCP's claim "No proof that COVID-19 originated in Wuhan: Peter Forster" https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/covid-19-genetic-network-analysis-provides-snapshot-of-pandemic-origins Study charts the 'incipient supernova' of COVID-19 through genetic mutations as it spread from China and Asia to Australia, Europe and North America Versions of ‘A’ were seen in Chinese individuals, and Americans reported to have lived in Wuhan, and mutated versions of ‘A’ were found in patients from the USA and Australia. Wuhan’s major virus type, ‘B’, was prevalent in patients from across East Asia. However, the variant didn’t travel much beyond the region without further mutations – implying a 'founder event' in Wuhan, or 'resistance' against this type of COVID-19 outside East Asia, say researchers. * CCP's claim "No proof that COVID-19 originated in Wuhanr" is bullshit* . From https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2020/04/07/2004999117 has https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/early/2020/04/07/2004999117/F1.large.jpg Fig. 1. Phylogenetic network of 160 SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Node A is the root cluster obtained with the bat (R. affinis) coronavirus isolate BatCoVRaTG13 from Yunnan Province. Circle areas are proportional to the number of taxa, and each notch on the links represents a mutated nucleotide position. The sequence range under consideration is 56 to 29,797, with nucleotide position (np) numbering according to the Wuhan 1 reference sequence (8). The median-joining network algorithm (2) and the Steiner algorithm (9) were used, both implemented in the software package Network5011CS (https://www.fluxus-engineering.com/), with the parameter epsilon set to zero, generating this network containing 288 most-parsimonious trees of length 229 mutations. The reticulations are mainly caused by recurrent mutations at np11083. The 161 taxa (160 human viruses and one bat virus) yield 101 distinct genomic sequences. The phylogenetic diagram is available for detailed scrutiny in A0 poster format (SI Appendix, Fig. S5) and in the free Network download files.
    1
  11531. 1
  11532. 1
  11533. 1
  11534. 1
  11535. 1
  11536. 1
  11537. 1
  11538. 1
  11539. 1
  11540. 1
  11541. 1
  11542. 1
  11543. 1
  11544. 1
  11545. 1
  11546.  @justanotherhobbit7215  1. "Sky Corp" doesn't exist. Prove amendments were made by Sky Corp. Where's the submission. 2. These private companies have demand to be left alone from government interference while the same private companies interfered in the government election process. 3. On news item placement, transparency should include the high-level algorithm for legal entities involved in the process e.g. News Networks . Your conspiracy theory is BS. 4. ABC https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/left-wing-bias-proves-it-is-clearly-their-abc-20210111-p56taq Left-wing bias proves it is clearly 'their ABC' The last major bush-fire issue shows ABC's leftist agenda when 50C temp is not enough to start a bush fire. As for https://www.sbs.com.au/news/eight-in-ten-australians-fear-climate-change-will-cause-more-bushfires-and-want-a-transition-away-from-coal SBS shows their leftist green agenda when the last federal election smashed their argument. 5. Peter Costello is not the CEO of Nine Entertainment Co. The merger between Nine Entertainment Co. and Fairfax Media results in Nine shareholders own 51.1 percent of the combined entity and Fairfax shareholders own 48.9 percent. Australian Channel Nine's Today shows their hate against Brooke Smith's lifestyle. If Brooke Smith's lifestyle was LGBT, there will be an uproar against Channel Nine's Today's hate. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-7971151/Stay-home-mums-housework-list-sparks-debate-Facebook-people-say-shes-living-50s-life.html Try again
    1
  11547. 1
  11548. 1
  11549. 1
  11550. 1
  11551. 1
  11552. 1
  11553. 1
  11554. 1
  11555. 1
  11556. 1
  11557. 1
  11558. 1
  11559. 1
  11560. 1
  11561. 1
  11562. 1
  11563. 1
  11564. 1
  11565. 1
  11566. 1
  11567. 1
  11568. 1
  11569. 1
  11570. 1
  11571. 1
  11572. 1
  11573. 1
  11574.  @StealthyyyHD  Your facts are FALSE. Minsk I By January 2015, the Minsk Protocol ceasefire had completely collapsed. Following the separatist victory at Donetsk International Airport in defiance of the Protocol. Minsk II The full text of the agreement is as follows: 1. Immediate and full ceasefire in particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine and its strict fulfilment as of 00:00 midnight EET on 15 February 2015. 2. Pull-out of all heavy weapons by both sides to equal distance with the aim of creation of a security zone on minimum 50 kilometres (31 mi) apart for artillery of 100mm calibre or more, and a security zone of 70 kilometres (43 mi) for multiple rocket launchers (MRLS) and 140 kilometres (87 mi) for MLRS Tornado-S, Uragan, Smerch, and Tochka U tactical missile systems: for Ukrainian troops, from actual line of contact; for armed formations of particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine, from the contact line in accordance with the Minsk Memorandum as of 19 September 2014 The pullout of the above-mentioned heavy weapons must start no later than the second day after the start of the ceasefire and finish within 14 days. This process will be assisted by OSCE with the support of the Trilateral Contact Group. 3. Effective monitoring and verification of ceasefire regime and pullout of heavy weapons by OSCE will be provided from the first day of pullout, using all necessary technical means such as satellites, drones, radio-location systems etc. 4. On the first day after the pullout a dialogue is to start on modalities of conducting local elections in accordance with the Ukrainian legislation and the Law of Ukraine "On temporary Order of Local Self-Governance in Particular Districts of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts," and also about the future of these districts based on the above-mentioned law. Without delays, but no later than 30 days from the date of signing of this document, a resolution has to be approved by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, indicating the territory which falls under the special regime in accordance with the law "On temporary Order of Local Self-Governance in Particular Districts of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts," based in the line set up by the Minsk Memorandum as of 19 September 2014. 5. Provide pardon and amnesty by way of enacting a law that forbids persecution and punishment of persons in relation to events that took place in particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine. 6. Provide release and exchange of all hostages and illegally held persons, based on the principle of "all for all". This process has to end – at the latest – on the fifth day after the pullout (of weapons). 7. Provide safe access, delivery, storage and distribution of humanitarian aid to the needy, based on an international mechanism. 8. Define the modalities of a full restoration of social and economic connections, including social transfers, such as payments of pensions and other payments (income and revenue, timely payment of communal bills, restoration of tax payments within the framework of Ukrainian legal field). With this aim, Ukraine will restore management over the segment of its banking system in the districts affected by the conflict, and possibly, an international mechanism will be established to ease such transactions. 9. Restore control of the state border to the Ukrainian government in the whole conflict zone, which has to start on the first day after the local election and end after the full political regulation (local elections in particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts based on the law of Ukraine and Constitutional reform) by the end of 2015, on the condition of fulfilment of Point 11 – in consultations and in agreement with representatives of particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts within the framework of the Trilateral Contact Group. 10. Pullout of all foreign armed formations, military equipment, and also mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine under OSCE supervision. Disarmament of all illegal groups. 11. Constitutional reform in Ukraine, with a new constitution to come into effect by the end of 2015, the key element of which is decentralisation (taking into account peculiarities of particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, agreed with representatives of these districts), and also approval of permanent legislation on the special status of particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts in accordance with the measures spelt out in the attached footnote,[note 1] by the end of 2015. 12. Based on the Law of Ukraine "On temporary Order of Local Self-Governance in Particular Districts of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts", questions related to local elections will be discussed and agreed upon with representatives of particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts in the framework of the Trilateral Contact Group. Elections will be held in accordance with relevant OSCE standards and monitored by OSCE/ODIHR. 13. Intensify the work of the Trilateral Contact Group including through the establishment of working groups on the implementation of relevant aspects of the Minsk agreements. They will reflect the composition of the Trilateral Contact Group. Signatories The document was signed by: Separatist's leaders Alexander Zakharchenko and Igor Plotnitsky Swiss diplomat and OSCE representative Heidi Tagliavini Former president of Ukraine and Ukrainian representative Leonid Kuchma Russian Ambassador to Ukraine and Russian representative Mikhail Zurabov ------
    1
  11575. 1
  11576. 1
  11577. 1
  11578. 1
  11579. 1
  11580. 1
  11581. 1
  11582. 1
  11583. 1
  11584. 1
  11585. 1
  11586. 1
  11587. 1
  11588. 1
  11589. 1
  11590. 1
  11591. 1
  11592. 1
  11593. 1
  11594. 1
  11595. 1
  11596. 1
  11597. 1
  11598. 1
  11599. 1
  11600. 1
  11601. 1
  11602. 1
  11603. 1
  11604. 1
  11605. 1
  11606. 1
  11607. 1
  11608. 1
  11609. 1
  11610. 1
  11611. 1
  11612. 1
  11613. 1
  11614. 1
  11615. 1
  11616. 1
  11617. 1
  11618. 1
  11619. 1
  11620. 1
  11621. 1
  11622. 1
  11623. 1
  11624. 1
  11625. 1
  11626. 1
  11627. 1
  11628. 1
  11629. 1
  11630. 1
  11631. 1
  11632. 1
  11633. 1
  11634. 1
  11635. 1
  11636. 1
  11637. 1
  11638. 1
  11639. 1
  11640. 1
  11641. 1
  11642. 1
  11643. 1
  11644. 1
  11645. 1
  11646. 1
  11647. 1
  11648. 1
  11649. 1
  11650. 1
  11651. 1
  11652. @D L Nope, US Army already has M26 Pershing and Super Pershing. US Amry's General Lesley McNair needs to be removed from his position. McNair was the main blocker against M26 program. McNair was killed by friendly fire. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M26_Pershing McNair, who was an artillery officer, had promulgated the "tank destroyer doctrine" in the U.S. Army. In this doctrine, tanks were primarily for infantry support and exploitation of breakthroughs. Those tactics dictated that enemy tanks were to be engaged by tank destroyer forces, which were composed of lightly armored but relatively fast vehicles carrying more powerful anti-tank guns, as well as towed versions of these anti-tank guns. Under the tank destroyer doctrine, emphasis was placed only on improving the firepower of the tank destroyers, as there was a strong bias against developing a heavy tank to take on enemy tanks. This also limited improvements in the firepower of the M4 Sherman.[28] The US Army Ground Forces that supported this doctrine got the approval of new TD projects, one of them using the same 90 mm gun, while at the same time they were blocking tank projects. ---- General Devers pressed on with his advocacy for the T26, going over McNair's head to General George Marshall, and, on 16 December 1943, Marshall overruled McNair and authorized the production of 250 T26E1 tanks. Then, in late December 1943, Devers was transferred to the Mediterranean, where he eventually led the invasion of Southern France with the 6th Army Group. In his absence, further attempts were made to derail the T26 program, but continued support from Generals Marshall and Eisenhower kept the production order alive ---------------------- Politics has delayed US Army's heavy tank development.
    1
  11653.  @erichvonmanstein1952  SA production is more than 4 times since US was only nation to mass produced aircraft carriers. Germany Tiger I tank's 1,347 units x 44 tons = 59,268 tons Tiger II tank has 492 units x 68 tons = 33,456 tons Panther tank has 6000 units x 44 tons = 264,000 tons Panzer IV has 8,553 unit x 25 tons = 213,825 tons Total: 570549 tons Czech's Panzer 38(t) has 1414 units x 10 tons = 14140 tons USA M26 tanks has 2,212 units x 44 tons = 97,328 tons M26 has 90 mm gun. M4 tanks has 49,234 units x 33 tons = 1,624,722, Russian T34 tanks has similar number. M10 tank destroyer has 6,406 units x 29 tons = 185,774 tons M18 tank destroyer has 2,507 units x 39 tons = 97,773 tons M36 tank destroyer has 2,324 units x 29 tons = 67,396 tons M36 has 90 mm gun. Sub-Total: 2,072,993 tons M4 Sherman Firefly (UK) has 2,200 units x 35 tons = 77,000 tons. Firefly takes on Tiger I and Panther tanks. US has both quality (M26) and numbers (M4). Significant amount of US Army's tonnage was against German army. US has the following aircraft carrier production 24 Essex-class fleet carriers with 90 to 110 aircraft each. 650,400 tons for Essex-class. 21 Commencement Bay class with 228,900 tons 50 Casablanca-class with 390,000 tons. 45 Bogue-class with 747,900 tons 3 Yorktown-class fleet carriers with 59,400 tons Sub-Total: 3,798,645 tons Modern day USN aircraft carrier tonnage is just about 1,460,000 tons. Significant amount of USN's tonnage was against Japanese navy. WW2 UK has similar aircraft carrier builds as Imperial Japan i.e. around 10 to 11 units. Not including UK, US and Canada other surface combat ships e.g. destroyers, heavy cruisers, battleships and 'etc'. Grand Total: 5,871,638 tons For US, that's already 10.3X times over Germany's iron/steel tonnage extract/production. WW2 Russian navy is small. WW2 German navy is small. Both Canada and USA has the advantage of the entire North American continent on raw metal and oil resources. European mainland is raw resource poor, hence the reason for Hitler wanting Russian lands.
    1
  11654. 1
  11655. 1
  11656. 1
  11657. 1
  11658. 1
  11659. 1
  11660. 1
  11661. 1
  11662. 1
  11663. 1
  11664. 1
  11665. 1
  11666. 1
  11667. 1
  11668. 1
  11669. 1
  11670. 1
  11671. 1
  11672. 1
  11673. 1
  11674. 1
  11675. 1
  11676. 1
  11677. 1
  11678. 1
  11679. 1
  11680. 1
  11681. 1
  11682. 1
  11683. 1
  11684. 1
  11685. 1
  11686. 1
  11687. 1
  11688. 1
  11689. 1
  11690. 1
  11691. 1
  11692. 1
  11693. 1
  11694. 1
  11695. 1
  11696. 1
  11697. 1
  11698. 1
  11699. 1
  11700. 1
  11701. 1
  11702. 1
  11703. 1
  11704. 1
  11705. 1
  11706. 1
  11707. 1
  11708. 1
  11709. 1
  11710. 1
  11711. 1
  11712.  @ransertu7630  From Prakken d'Oliveira (human rights lawyers) ---- Date: 25 April 2013 On 24 April 2013, the district court of The Hague sentenced Dutch businessman Frans van Anraat to payment of damages to the victims of mustard-gas attacks in Iraq and Iran in the 1980s. The district court declared Iranian and Iraqi law applicable to the claims. It found one of the claims filed by an Iraqi plaintiff to inadmissible due to prescription. The court granted the sixteen other claims, and awarded the plaintiffs Euro 25.000,00 each for immaterial damages suffered. During the Saddam Hussein-regime, Van Anraat supplied the Iraqi military industry with large quantities of thiodiglycol (‘TDG’). The Iraqi regime then used that material to produce mustard gas, which was subsequently processed in bombs. The Iraqi regime then used those bombs against civilians in the mid-eighties. The civilians suffered serious, lasting damage (to their health) as a result. The seventeen plaintiffs in this case were victims of these chemical attacks. The criminal involvement of Van Anraat with these war crimes was confirmed in a final judgment by a three-judge chamber of the Appeals Court of The Hague. However, the chamber referred the claims filed by the victims as ‘injured party’ to the civil court. For that reason, plaintiffs subpoenaed Van Anraat in a civil suit on 14 December 2009, respectively 7 July 2010. Lawyer Liesbeth Zegveld represented the victims in both the criminal case and the civil procedure. ----- The Iraqi WMD question is still ongoing and the European courts will deal with it.
    1
  11713. 1
  11714. 1
  11715. 1
  11716. 1
  11717.  @ommsterlitz1805  https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/f-35-overwhelming-superiority-over-rafale-and-eurofighter-in-atlantic-trident.523986/ The F-35A's overwhelming superiority has been recorded in some of the most epic air combat in NATO history when the USAF fighter met for the Atlantic Trident (April 12-18), French Rafale fighters and British Eurofighter Typhoon https://sldinfo.com/2017/05/a-french-air-force-perspective-on-atlantic-trident-2017/ A French Air Force Perspective on “Atlantic Trident 2017” “The eyes of the French Air Force was clearly opened with regard to the F-22 and fifth generation, and they themselves have much to contribute with their battle hardened combat capability and their latest generation aircraft.” http://www.opex360.com/2017/04/12/le-rafale-va-pouvoir-se-mesurer-au-f-35a-lors-de-lexercice-atlantic-trident-2017/ "The French, American and British crews will quickly get to the heart of the matter, with a first day of practice dedicated to "Basic Fighting Manœuvers", with oppositions in one against the other. Greek account of extracurricular encounters between the participants is more likely to be true than not. Firstly all the numbers he gave out were very specific and if he was pumping up the F-35 for anti Turkish reasons why say it lost one against the F-15E ? These unofficial dogfights happen all the time which we only get to hear about when participants start leaking info and there is a French report of Atlantic Trident which stated that on the first day the aircraft practiced among themselves before the official exercise began
    1
  11718. 1
  11719. 1
  11720. 1
  11721. 1
  11722. 1
  11723. 1
  11724. 1
  11725. 1
  11726. 1
  11727. 1
  11728. 1
  11729. 1
  11730. 1
  11731. 1
  11732. 1
  11733. 1
  11734. 1
  11735. 1
  11736. 1
  11737. 1
  11738. 1
  11739. 1
  11740. 1
  11741. 1
  11742. 1
  11743. 1
  11744. 1
  11745. 1
  11746. 1
  11747. 1
  11748. 1
  11749. 1
  11750. 1
  11751. 1
  11752. 1
  11753. 1
  11754. 1
  11755. 1
  11756. 1
  11757. 1
  11758. 1
  11759. 1
  11760. 1
  11761. 1
  11762. 1
  11763. 1
  11764. 1
  11765. 1
  11766. 1
  11767. 1
  11768. 1
  11769. 1
  11770. 1
  11771. 1
  11772. 1
  11773. 1
  11774. 1
  11775. 1
  11776. 1
  11777. 1
  11778. 1
  11779. 1
  11780. 1
  11781. 1
  11782. 1
  11783. 1
  11784. 1
  11785. 1
  11786. 1
  11787. 1
  11788. @Jay P >This example will show you how little you people know about the dirty tactics of Australians in Png That's a red herring. >Ok Tedi mine the Australian Manager opened a bank account in Singapore in 2013 the balance was 5 Billion and 200 Aussie owned credit cards were living off that account until one of the landowners complained they were not getting their royalties. Ok Tedi Mining Limited. The PNG Sustainable Development Program (SDP) was set up after BHP’s exit from the Ok Tedi mine in PNG’s Western Province just over a decade ago i.e. Year 2002. Essentially, BHP wanted to shut down the mine, the PNG government, however, wanted the mine to continue because it needed the tax revenue. (BHP exits from Ok Tedi Mining Limited from about 2002). But BHP did not want to give its shares in Ok Tedi to the PNG government because of well-established concerns about corruption and limited capacity within the PNG public sector. The compromise reached was an agreement that PNG would give its shares to a new trust fund, SDP, which would be registered in Singapore as a public company to be run by a board of directors, some nominated by BHP, the others nominated by a variety of PNG institutions . SDP was established in 2002. After a third shareholder exited, SDP was left with 63% of Ok Tedi’s shares. The remaining 37% were held by the government. With last decade’s resource boom, Ok Tedi became much more profitable than had ever been envisaged. It is now PNG’s largest mine and revenue earner. In 2011, it paid K1.2 billion (about $508 million) in tax. The original idea that the mine would close shortly after 2010 has been replaced by a plan to extend mine-life by shifting from open-cut to below-ground mining, which would require new legislation. SDP’s funds also grew rapidly over the decade. The value of its long-term fund reached $US 1.4 billion in 2012. Its annual development expenditure expanded, making it the second-largest donor in PNG, after AusAID. There was recurring tension between SDP and the PNG government over the last decade, but Sir Michael Somare had helped negotiate the deal while he was mining minister, so while he was prime minister (from 2002 to 2011) SDP was safe. Towards the end of 2012, Ross Garnaut, chairman of SDP since its inception, handed over the reins to Sir Mekere Morauta, who, as PM at the establishment of SDP, had also helped negotiate the deal. Comments made by Garnaut at the time about revenue from Ok Tedi (“it’s very tempting for political figures to think of better ways of using it right now rather than putting it into long-term development”) led to the PM banning his entry to the country. (An aside on another SDP board member: there was a remarkable announcement in the media recently that Jacob Weiss, a former International Monetary Fund employee who helped establish SDP and who served on its board as the Central Bank’s representative for the last 10 years, was stood down earlier in the year by the SDP Board on conflict-of-interest grounds, including his “appointment as the leader of the government team set up to take over PNG SDP’s shares in Ok Tedi”. It doesn’t get much stranger than that.) It became clear under O’Neill that legislation would only be passed to extend the life of Ok Tedi if SDP exited. Under its new chairman, SDP took a pragmatic and conciliatory approach. At its annual meeting a few months ago, Mekere appeared to acquiesce to its removal from Ok Tedi provided that there was a negotiated agreement, including a “fair and transparent” process. It seems from press reports that there were some discussions, but evidently agreement could not be reached. And so, after an escalating war of words, O’Neill not only introduced legislation this week, but had it passed by Parliament, all in the same day, to nationalise both Ok Tedi and SDP. According to reports, some members absented themselves from the vote, including Sir Michael Somare, who spoke against it, but no one voted against it. ------------ 1. In 2002, BHP Billiton completed its withdrawal from the project by transferring its majority shareholding to the PNG Sustainable Development Program. 2. Ok Tedi mine was nationalized in 2013. 3. Dr. Jakob Weiss (the IMF guy), a central banking specialist from the Bank of Israel to head the Economics department at the Bank of PNG. Unlike you, names were identified and attached. 4. Notice the amount of Australian aid (AusAID) being given to PNG exceeds SDP’s.
    1
  11789. 1
  11790. 1
  11791. 1
  11792. 1
  11793. 1
  11794. 1
  11795. 1
  11796. 1
  11797. 1
  11798. 1
  11799. 1
  11800. 1
  11801. 1
  11802. 1
  11803. 1
  11804. 1
  11805. 1
  11806. 1
  11807. Pierre Elliott Trudeau had a thing for Marxism and communist leaders, regardless of how murderous and despotic they were. And he apparently passed it down to his son. Back in 2013, for example, Trudeau was asked at a fundraising event what nation he admired the most. He didn’t even hesitate. “There’s a level of admiration I actually have for China,” he responded. “Their basic dictatorship is actually allowing them to turn their economy around on a dime.” Trudeau Sr. had been to China twice as a private citizen before his official 1973 visit as the prime minister of Canada, meeting privately in the Forbidden City with the rarely-seen Chairman Mao Zedong, then pushing 80. The atrocities Mao inflicted on his people were well documented by intelligence agencies, monitoring what the Cold War era then referred to as Red China. Pierre Trudeau was not blind to these obscenities. Many historians, in fact, put Mao above Hitler and Stalin when it comes to infamy, citing him as responsible for an estimated 40 million to 70 million deaths through starvation, forced labour and executions, with his tenure ranked as the top incident of democide in all of human history. When estimated death tolls vary by as much as 30 million, which is the approximate population of Canada, it speaks volumes about China’s iron lid on containment. Three years after Mao, Pierre Trudeau was off to Havana to become pals with Cuban dictator Fidel Castro, so much so that Castro, despite then being quite feeble, insisted on attending Trudeau’s funeral in Montreal 16 years ago. A 2009 report by Human Rights Watch concluded that Castro’s brother, Raul Castro, has “kept Cuba’s repressive machinery firmly in place” since taking over control of the country. There is little doubt that Justin Trudeau will be reminded of his father’s grand associations with Mao and Castro when he meets at the end of next month with Chinese President Xi Jinping.
    1
  11808. 1
  11809. 1
  11810. 1
  11811. 1
  11812. @Blackjack Videos https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion Jacob Brafman, a Russian Jew from Minsk, had a falling out with agents of the local qahal and consequently turned against Judaism. He subsequently converted to the Russian Orthodox Church and authored polemics against the Talmud and the qahal You failed with the basics, hence why I used Wiki. Loser Imperial Purssia (Germany) exported Marx Communism ideology to Russia. Loser Imperial Russia era exported Protocols of the Elders of Zion like ideology to Germany. Both Nazi Germany and USSR invaded Poland, hence started WW2. Any idealogies from loser countries from Germany to Russia are ideological land mines which sets the stage for WW2. -------------- https://www.britannica.com/topic/Talmud Opposition To The Talmud Despite the central place of the Talmud in traditional Jewish life and thought, significant Jewish groups and individuals have opposed it vigorously. The Karaite sect in Babylonia, beginning in the 8th century, refuted the oral tradition and denounced the Talmud as a rabbinic fabrication. Medieval Jewish mystics declared the Talmud a mere shell covering the concealed meaning of the written Torah, and heretical messianic sects in the 17th and 18th centuries totally rejected it. The decisive blow to Talmudic authority came in the 18th and 19th centuries when the Haskala (the Jewish Enlightenment movement) and its aftermath, Reform Judaism, secularized Jewish life and, in doing so, shattered the Talmudic wall that had surrounded the Jews. Thereafter, modernized Jews usually rejected the Talmud as a medieval anachronism, denouncing it as legalistic, casuistic, devitalized, and unspiritual. Reformist Jews dumps Talmud!
    1
  11813. 1
  11814. 1
  11815. 1
  11816. 1
  11817. 1
  11818. 1
  11819. 1
  11820. 1
  11821. 1
  11822. 1
  11823. 1
  11824. 1
  11825. 1
  11826. 1
  11827. 1
  11828. 1
  11829. 1
  11830. 1
  11831. 1
  11832. 1
  11833. 1
  11834. 1
  11835. 1
  11836. 1
  11837. 1
  11838. 1
  11839. 1
  11840. 1
  11841. 1
  11842. 1
  11843. 1
  11844. 1
  11845.  @KJI-Dew  Note that China has a "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" which is known as CCP's protectionist list. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  11846. 1
  11847. 1
  11848. 1
  11849. 1
  11850.  @nobordersnowelfare7285  >Yeah, maybe they got tired of the killings of Russians in Donbas and Luhansk? Putin's argument on Ukrainians and Russians being one people was debunked when either side enforced their respective languages, the opposite side complains. Ukraine still allows English language schools. HAHAHAHAH LOL Is English taught in Russian schools? Today, foreign language learning has become compulsory in Russia. Students can choose from different language such as German, French and Spanish. Among the other foreign languages taught in Russia, English is the most widely chosen language by Russian students (Kruglyi stol 2007 cited in Proshina 2010). Hint: EuroVision's English language dominance. > The thought of Tomahawks 600 km away from Moscow maybe? The US has rejected Tomahawks' sales to Israel. Besides the micro-nuclear reactor IP access, Australia needs the AUKUS agreement for Tomahawk cruise missiles. Moscow has placed nuclear missiles next to the EU countries, hypocrite. Your argument is Russia 1st. >Ukraines aspirations of NATO-membership? Unlike Russia's action against Ukraine, Greece has withdrawn from NATO Command when Turkey invaded Cyprus, hence showing freedom of association. Unlike Russia's action against Ukraine, the UK has exited from EU while on track to join CPTPP, hence showing freedom of association. Before Euromaidan, Russia, however, has successfully used political and economic leverage to dissuade Ukraine from signing the E.U. deal. In the months prior to the Vilnius summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a trade war with Kiev, blocking nearly all imports from Ukraine and cutting energy supplies to the country. In turn, this reduced Ukrainian exports by 25 percent and shrank the economy by 1.5 percent. Russia started a series of events that lead to Euromaidan.
    1
  11851.  @nobordersnowelfare7285  >How about NATOs destruction of Libya, Iraq and Syria? That's a false equivalence. Unlike Russia, the US did NOT assimilate Iraq into US federal structure. >Libya NATO STOPPED the bloody civil war in Libya. Putin STARTED the bloody war in Ukraine. On 16 August 2003, Libya formally admitted responsibility for Pan Am Flight 103 (Lockabie bombing) in a letter presented to the president of the United Nations Security Council. "On 10 March 2011, France was the first country in the world to recognise the National Transitional Council as the legitimate government of Libya". >Iraq Iraq invaded Kuwait. Iraq STARTED the bloody war in Kuwait. Iraq's top oil exports countries from Jan to Jun 2020 1st, China! 29 million tonnes <---- LOL 2nd, India, 23 million tonnes 3rd, EU, 8 million tonnes 4th, South Korea, 6 million tonnes 5th, Turkey, 4 million tonnes with an upwards trend 5th, USA, 4 million tonnes with a downwards trend Report: Saudi Arabia Presses U.S. on Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Date: January 19, 1992 From AP NEWS NEW YORK (AP) _ Saudi Arabia is pressuring the Bush administration to secretly arm and give intelligence to Iraqi opposition forces so they can work to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a newspaper reported Sunday. The Saudis want the United States to give arms and intelligence to Kurdish rebels in north Iraq, Shiite Muslim fighters in the south and Sunni Muslim opposition forces in central Iraq, the Times said, quoting U.S. and allied officials it didn’t name.
    1
  11852. 1
  11853. 1
  11854. 1
  11855. 1
  11856. 1
  11857. 1
  11858. 1
  11859. 1
  11860.  @nobordersnowelfare7285  >or how about 13% flat tax like in Russia? The Russian tax system tends to use moderate flat or regressive tax rates. It is highly centralized for a federal state and relies heavily on proceeds from oil and natural gas corporations, who themselves are mostly state owned. In 2006 the tax burden on oil companies exceeded 45 percent of net sales (compared to 12 percent in construction and 16.5 percent in telecommunications). Rates for oil-related taxes and tariffs, unlike regular taxes, are set not by the Tax Code but by government decree. The Russian Ministry of Finance estimated that revenues regulated by the Tax Code accounted for 68 percent of federal revenue in 2008 fiscal year, rising to 73 percent in 2010. Individuals are supposed to pay in income tax (13 percent), land tax (0.3 percent of the land's cadastral plot which is calculated by a special formula) and vehicle tax (which is linked to the vehicle's engine power). Most small businesses are eligible for simplified taxation and can choose one of the following taxes: income tax (6 percent) or profits tax (15 percent) or unified agricultural tax (6 percent, farmers only) or tax on imputed income (calculated by a special formula, certain companies only). Corporate taxes for medium and large businesses include profits tax (20 percent), value-added tax (20 percent), property tax (0-2 percent) and some other taxes like water tax and mineral tax. ------ Russia's VAT (GST in Oz) is 20%. Australia's GST is 10%.
    1
  11861. 1
  11862. 1
  11863. 1
  11864. 1
  11865. 1
  11866. 1
  11867. 1
  11868.  @fromscotland2380  Claim, NATO Promised Not To Expand A Single Inch East! Fact : Six countries only Agreed To Restrictions On Former GDR In 1990, six countries – East and West Germany, the United States, the Soviet Union, Britain and France – held discussions on the reunification of Germany. The Germans, Americans, British, and French agreed that there would be “no deployment of non-German NATO forces on the territory of the former GDR (East Germany)“. That agreement was incorporated in Article 5 of the Treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany, which was signed on 12 September 1990 by the six countries : Until Soviet forces had completed their withdrawal from the former GDR, only German territorial defense units not integrated into NATO would be deployed in that territory. There would be no increase in the numbers of troops or equipment of U.S., British and French forces stationed in Berlin. Once Soviet forces had withdrawn, German forces assigned to NATO could be deployed in the former GDR, but foreign forces and nuclear weapons systems would not be deployed there. --- In 1997, NATO and Russia signed a treaty stating that each country had a sovereign right to seek alliances (1) 1. Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security between NATO and the Russian Federation signed in Paris, France. The Act has been referred to NATO countries and President Yeltsin for approval. Pre-1997 member states of NATO approved the "Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security between NATO and the Russian Federation".
    1
  11869. 1
  11870. 1
  11871. 1
  11872. 1
  11873. 1
  11874. 1
  11875. 1
  11876. 1
  11877. 1
  11878. 1
  11879. 1
  11880. 1
  11881. 1
  11882. 1
  11883. 1
  11884. 1
  11885. 1
  11886. 1
  11887. 1
  11888. 1
  11889. 1
  11890. 1
  11891. 1
  11892. 1
  11893. 1
  11894. 1
  11895. 1
  11896. 1
  11897. 1
  11898. 1
  11899. 1
  11900. 1
  11901. 1
  11902. 1
  11903. 1
  11904. 1
  11905. 1
  11906. 1
  11907. 1
  11908. 1
  11909. 1
  11910. 1
  11911. 1
  11912. 1
  11913. 1
  11914. 1
  11915. 1
  11916. 1
  11917. 1
  11918. 1
  11919.  @jliang70  Lowyinstitute's debunking-myth-china-s-debt-trap-diplomacy article didn't factor in Sri Lankan' new government is investigating a Chinese firm on suspicion of offering a bribe to Mahinda Rajapaksa'. History: In the mid-2000s, Colombo (the commercial capital of Sri Lanka) agreed to let Beijing build a new port from scratch in the town of Hambantota, in the south of the island. It wasn’t yet thought of as part of a new Silk Road -- that programme was conceptualizsed by Xi Jinping in 2012 -- but all the ingredients were there. "Chinese funds and engineers are mobilised to build infrastructure outside China, as part of a partnership that was meant to be win-win: this is the very definition of the rationale of the Silk Road," said Jean-François Dufour, economist and director of DCA China-Analysis. The Chinese president integrated the Sri Lankan project into his Silk Road initiative in 2013. But in 2015, financial clouds began gathering over the future of Hambantota’s port, which cost $1.1 billion. Sri Lanka was crumbling under the debt, and was unable to repay the more than $8 billion in loans it had taken from China for several infrastructure projects in the country. Furious, Beijing turned up the heat and threatened to cut off financial support to the island nation if it didn’t quickly find a solution. In December, 2017, after two years of negotiations, Colombo finally agreed to turn over the port to China for 99 years in exchange for the cancellation of its debt. The concession was humiliating for Sri Lanka, while "the opponents of China, like India, painted the entire operation as a deliberate plan to acquire strategic positions in the region," Dufour said. China was suspected of intentionally strangling Colombo with loans at a 6 percent interest rate, which was much higher than the other lenders - such as the World Bank – from which Colombo had previously borrowed.
    1
  11920.  @jliang70  Did you assume I wasn't aware Lowy and specifically, the author of Debunking the myth of China’s “debt-trap diplomacy” article is Shahar Hameiri from the University of Queensland? Peter_Høj joined Hanban (Council of Confucius Institute Headquarter) as an unpaid senior consultant in 2013 and was later appointed a member of the governing council of Confucius Institute Headquarters in 2017. He stood down in late 2018 from his position due to legal advice surrounding his required signing of Australia's new Foreign Interference Transparency Scheme. Høj’s involvement with the Institute was seen as controversial after a Four Corners investigation by the ABC found that the Chinese government and the UQ Confucius Institute had co-funded four University of Queensland courses. Furthermore a separate investigation by Four Corner’s highlighted that the Confucius Institute had been involved with honorary staff appointments and curriculum development at the University of Queensland. In May 2019 the UQ senate ceased accepting funding from the Confucius Institute. When interviewed about the situation Høj explained, "having courses concerning China is totally appropriate". He further said "It's very appropriate for universities such as ours to educate our students about Chinese politics, Chinese economics because we live in a region where China will be the largest economy in the world very soon, the largest trading partner for Australia". When questioned on the institute's involvement he said,"Is it appropriate that a Confucius Institute devises courses? No, it's not, but they don't. They're not involved in the design of the course. They're not involved in the delivery.”. The investigation interviewed Ross Babbage, senior security adviser to the federal government, and Clive Hamilton, an academic who focuses primarily on the interference of the Chinese Communist Party at Australian universities, both suggested a review into the universities' relationship with the institute. Furthermore Høj, when asked if he was influenced by the Chinese Communist party during his time at the Confucius Institute, said, "I'm very confident that I haven't been influenced."[12]
    1
  11921. 1
  11922. 1
  11923. 1
  11924. 1
  11925. 1
  11926. 1
  11927. 1
  11928. 1
  11929. 1
  11930. 1
  11931. 1
  11932. 1
  11933. 1
  11934. 1
  11935. 1
  11936. 1
  11937.  @jliang70  The debt repudiation example On February 8, 1918, the Soviet government repudiated all bonds issued by the Tsarist government when the Soviet of People's Commissars of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (RSFSR) cancelled all previously issued Russian government debt. It stopped payment on foreign debt at the beginning of 1918 and declared that all debts contracted by the Russian Empire were cancelled, as well as the debts contracted by the Russian Provisional Government, so that the war could be continued from February to November 1917. At the same time, the Soviets decided to expropriate all assets of foreign nations in Russia. The Soviets also nationalized banks, lands, and industries. By repudiating the external debt, the Soviet government implemented the Petrograd Soviet’s decision of 1905.[4] During the Cold War, the west imposed trade sanctions against RSFSR's expropriations. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the newly formed Russian Federation had to not only come up with a new financial strategy for its future, but also had to consider repaying the billions of dollars the Soviet Union borrowed from abroad. In 1996, Paris and Moscow signed an accord for Russia to repay a nominal value of between $80 and $100 for each of the 4 million czarist bonds believed to remain in circulation in France, for a total payout of around $400 million.[6] Russia paid but not nearly as generously as the descendants of French bond buyers hoped.[7] You suck at history.
    1
  11938. 1
  11939. 1
  11940. 1
  11941. 1
  11942. 1
  11943. 1
  11944. 1
  11945. 1
  11946. 1
  11947. 1
  11948. 1
  11949. 1
  11950. 1
  11951. 1
  11952. 1
  11953. 1
  11954. 1
  11955. 1
  11956. 1
  11957.  @jliang70  Iraqi weapons before the 1991 Gulf war. Land-based Infantry weapons AK-47 AKS-47 AKM AK-63 AK-74 AKS-74U PM md. 63 MPi-KM Type 81 vz.58 FN FAL Zastava M70 Zastava M76 Tabuk Sniper Rifle Heckler & Koch MP5 [1] Sterling PPSh-41 PPS-43 Type 56 assault rifle PM-63 RAK PM-84 vz.61 Skorpion Type 69 RPG RPG-7 M136 AT4 PK machine gun FN MAG MG 3 MG 42 PKT RPK RPD Zastava M72 Type 67 Zastava M70B1 Zastava M80 Dragunov sniper rifle Steyr SSG 69 PSL (rifle) SKS NSV machine gun DShK KPV Type 80 Zastava M84 SG-43 Goryunov DSHKM TT pistol CZ-75 CZ-82 Tariq Browning Hi-Power Beretta Model 1951 Makarov pistol FEG PA-63 [2] Mauser Karabiner 98k Lee-Enfield Mosin-Nagant M1891 M1917 Enfield Automatgevär m/42 Tanks T-72M/M1 MBT (Main Battle Tank) T-72 Ural MBT (Main Battle Tank) Asad Babil MBT (Main Battle Tank) T-62 MBT (Main Battle Tank) T-55A MBT (Main Battle Tank) T-55 MBT (Main Battle Tank) T-54 MBT (Main Battle Tank) T-55 Enigma MBT (Main Battle Tank) T-55QM MBT (Main Battle Tank) T-55QM2 MBT (Main Battle Tank) Type 59 MBT (Main Battle Tank) Type 69-II MBT (Main Battle Tank) Type 69-QM MBT (Main Battle Tank) Type 69-QM2 MBT (Main Battle Tank) TR 800 MBT (Main Battle Tank)[8] PT-76 Amphibious Tank M36 (Iran Army) M4 Sherman (Iran Army) Armoured vehicles BMP-1 IFV (Infantry Fighting Vehicle) BMP-2 IFV (Infantry Fighting Vehicle) AMX-10P IFV (Infantry Fighting Vehicle) Panhard AML-60 Armoured Car Panhard AML-90 Armoured Car Engesa EE-9 Cascavel Armoured Car Engesa EE-3 Jararaca Reconnaissance Vehicle BRDM-2 (Reconnaissance Vehicle) Panhard M3 (Armored Personnel Carrier) Engesa EE-11 Urutu APC (Armored Personnel Carrier) YW351 APC (Armored Personnel Carrier) OT-62C APC (Armored Personnel Carrier) OT-64C SKOT-2A APC (Armored Personnel Carrier) Walid (armored personnel carrier) (Armored Personnel Carrier) PSZH D-944 APC (Armored Personnel Carrier) MT-LB APC (Armored Personnel Carrier) Mowag Roland APC (Armored Personnel Carrier) BTR-50P APC (Armored Personnel Carrier) BTR-60PB APC (Armored Personnel Carrier) BTR-80 APC (Armored Personnel Carrier) OT M-60P APC (Armored Personnel Carrier) Panhard VCR-TH ATGM (Anti-Tank Guided Missile) Launcher Vehicle BRDM-2 9P133 ATGM (Anti-Tank Guided Missile) Launcher Vehicle Self-Propelled Artillery/Mortars/Rockets/Missiles 2S1 Gvozdika 122 mm SPH (Self-Propelled Howitzer) 2S3 Akatsiya 152 mm SPH (Self-Propelled Howitzer) AMX-GCT 155 mm SPH (Self-Propelled Howitzer) M109A1 155 mm SPH (Self-Propelled Howitzer) ASTROS II MLRS (Multiple Launch Rocket System) RL-21 122 mm (Multiple Rocket Launcher) BM-21 Grad 122 mm MRL (Multiple Rocket Launcher) FROG-7 Luna-M TEL (Transporter/Erector/Launcher) 9P117/SS-1c Scud-B TEL (Transporter/Erector/Launcher) Anti-aircraft ZSU-57-2 SPAAA (Self-Propelled Anti-Aircraft Artillery) ZSU-23-4 Shilka SPAAA (Self-Propelled Anti-Aircraft Artillery) NIIP\Vympel 2K12 "Kub" SA-6a Gainful Self-Propelled SAM (Surface-To-Air Missile) Launcher Antey 9K33M Osa-AK SA-8b Gecko Self-Propelled SAM (Surface-To-Air Missile) Launcher Nudelman 9K31 "Strela-1" SA-9 Gaskin Self-Propelled SAM (Surface-To-Air Missile) Launcher ZRK-BD 9K35 "Strela-10" SA-13 Gopher Self-Propelled SAM (Surface-To-Air Missile) Launcher AMX-30 Roland 2 Self-Propelled SAM (Surface-To-Air Missile) Launcher Lavochkin OKB S-75 Dvina SA-2 Guideline SAM (Surface-To-Air Missile) Launcher Isayev S-125M "Neva-M" SA-3b Goa SAM (Surface-To-Air Missile) Launcher Roland 2 SAM (Surface-To-Air Missile) Launcher ZPU-1 14.5 mm Towed AAA (Anti-Aircraft Artillery) ZPU-2 14.5 mm Towed AAA (Anti-Aircraft Artillery) ZPU-4 14.5 mm Towed AAA (Anti-Aircraft Artillery) ZU-23-2 23 mm Towed AAA (Anti-Aircraft Artillery) M1939 37 mm Towed AAA (Anti-Aircraft Artillery) S-60 57 mm Towed AAA (Anti-Aircraft Artillery) S-60 Twin 57 mm Towed AAA (Anti-Aircraft Artillery) KS-19 100 mm Towed AAA (Anti-Aircraft Artillery) Artillery/mortars/rockets T-12 100 mm Anti-Tank Gun Type 63 107 mm MRL (Multiple Rocket Launcher) D-30 122 mm Towed Howitzer 130 mm towed field gun M1954 (M-46) 152 mm towed gun-howitzer M1955 (D-20) 2A36 152 mm Towed Howitzer Type 83 152 mm Towed Howitzer GHN-45 155 mm Towed Howitzer M-46 155 mm Towed Howitzer G5 155 mm Towed Howitzer Al-Jaleel 82 mm Mortar Al-Jaleel 120 mm Mortar M43 160 mm Mortar M240 240 mm Mortar
    1
  11958. 1
  11959.  @jliang70  From Iraq's 11,000-page report to the UN Security Council lists 150 foreign companies The five permanent members of the Security Council – the United States, Britain, Russia, France and China – have repeatedly opposed revealing the extent of foreign companies' involvement, although a mass of relevant information was collected by UN weapons inspectors who visited the country between 1991 and 1998. The UN claims that publishing the extent of the companies' involvement in Iraq would jeopardise necessary co-operation with such firms. German involvement outstripped that of all the other countries put together, the paper said. During the period to 1991, the German authoritiespermitted weapons co-operation with Iraq and in some cases "actively encouraged" it, according to the newspaper which cited German assistance allegedly given to Iraq for the development of poison gas used in the 1988 massacre of Kurds in northern Iraq. It said that after the massacre America reduced its military co-operation with Iraq but German firms continued their activities until the Gulf War. American weapons experts have recently voiced concern that the German Government has permitted Siemens to sell Baghdad at least eight sophisticated medical machines which contain devices that are vital for nuclear weapons. The machines, known as "lithotripters", use ultrasound to destroy kidney stones in patients. However, each machine contains an electronic switch that can be used as a detonator in an atomic bomb, according to US experts. Iraq was reported to have requested an extra 120 switches as "spare parts" during the initial transaction. The delivery of the machines was approved by the European Commission and the UN because sanctions against Iraq do not apply to medical equipment. Siemens and the German Government have insisted that the machines, which are being used in northern Iraq under a World Health Organisation programme, cannot be used to make nuclear weapons. ------ You're barking at the wrong tree.
    1
  11960. 1
  11961. 1
  11962. 1
  11963. 1
  11964. 1
  11965. 1
  11966. 1
  11967. 1
  11968. 1
  11969. 1
  11970. 1
  11971. 1
  11972. 1
  11973. 1
  11974. 1
  11975. 1
  11976. 1
  11977. 1
  11978. 1
  11979. 1
  11980. 1
  11981. 1
  11982. 1
  11983. 1
  11984. 1
  11985. 1
  11986. 1
  11987. 1
  11988. 1
  11989. 1
  11990. 1
  11991. 1
  11992. 1
  11993. 1
  11994. 1
  11995. 1
  11996. 1
  11997. 1
  11998. 1
  11999. 1
  12000. 1
  12001. 1
  12002. 1
  12003. 1
  12004. 1
  12005. 1
  12006. 1
  12007. 1
  12008. 1
  12009. 1
  12010. 1
  12011. 1
  12012. 1
  12013. 1
  12014. 1
  12015. 1
  12016. 1
  12017. 1
  12018. 1
  12019. 1
  12020. 1
  12021. 1
  12022. 1
  12023. 1
  12024. 1
  12025. 1
  12026. 1
  12027. 1
  12028. 1
  12029. 1
  12030. 1
  12031. 1
  12032. 1
  12033. 1
  12034. 1
  12035. 1
  12036. 1
  12037. 1
  12038. 1
  12039. 1
  12040. 1
  12041. 1
  12042. 1
  12043. 1
  12044. 1
  12045. 1
  12046. 1
  12047. 1
  12048. 1
  12049. 1
  12050. 1
  12051. 1
  12052. 1
  12053. 1
  12054. 1
  12055. 1
  12056. 1
  12057. 1
  12058. 1
  12059. 1
  12060. 1
  12061. 1
  12062. 1
  12063. 1
  12064. 1
  12065. 1
  12066. 1
  12067. 1
  12068. 1
  12069. 1
  12070. 1
  12071. 1
  12072. 1
  12073. 1
  12074. 1
  12075. 1
  12076. 1
  12077. 1
  12078. 1
  12079. 1
  12080. 1
  12081. 1
  12082. 1
  12083. 1
  12084. 1
  12085. 1
  12086. 1
  12087. 1
  12088. 1
  12089. 1
  12090. 1
  12091. 1
  12092. 1
  12093. 1
  12094. 1
  12095. 1
  12096. 1
  12097. 1
  12098. 1
  12099. 1
  12100. 1
  12101. 1
  12102. 1
  12103. 1
  12104. 1
  12105. 1
  12106. 1
  12107. 1
  12108. 1
  12109. 1
  12110. 1
  12111. 1
  12112. 1
  12113. 1
  12114. 1
  12115. 1
  12116. 1
  12117. 1
  12118. 1
  12119. 1
  12120. 1
  12121. 1
  12122. 1
  12123. 1
  12124. 1
  12125. 1
  12126. 1
  12127. 1
  12128. 1
  12129.  @gboete  Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq
    1
  12130. 1
  12131. 1
  12132. 1
  12133. 1
  12134. 1
  12135. 1
  12136. 1
  12137. 1
  12138. 1
  12139. 1
  12140. 1
  12141. 1
  12142. 1
  12143. 1
  12144. 1
  12145. 1
  12146. 1
  12147. 1
  12148. 1
  12149. 1
  12150. 1
  12151. 1
  12152. 1
  12153. 1
  12154. 1
  12155. 1
  12156. 1
  12157. 1
  12158. 1
  12159. 1
  12160. 1
  12161. 1
  12162. 1
  12163. 1
  12164. 1
  12165. 1
  12166. 1
  12167. 1
  12168. 1
  12169. 1
  12170. 1
  12171. 1
  12172. 1
  12173. 1
  12174. 1
  12175. 1
  12176. 1
  12177. 1
  12178. 1
  12179. 1
  12180. 1
  12181. 1
  12182. 1
  12183. 1
  12184. 1
  12185. 1
  12186. 1
  12187. 1
  12188. 1
  12189. 1
  12190. 1
  12191. 1
  12192. 1
  12193. 1
  12194. 1
  12195. 1
  12196. 1
  12197. 1
  12198. 1
  12199. 1
  12200. 1
  12201. 1
  12202. 1
  12203. 1
  12204. 1
  12205. 1
  12206. 1
  12207. 1
  12208. 1
  12209. 1
  12210. 1
  12211. 1
  12212. 1
  12213. 1
  12214. 1
  12215. 1
  12216. 1
  12217. 1
  12218. 1
  12219. 1
  12220. 1
  12221. 1
  12222. 1
  12223. 1
  12224. 1
  12225. 1
  12226. 1
  12227. 1
  12228. 1
  12229. 1
  12230. 1
  12231. 1
  12232. 1
  12233. 1
  12234. 1
  12235. 1
  12236. 1
  12237. 1
  12238. 1
  12239. 1
  12240. 1
  12241. 1
  12242. 1
  12243.  @chcheese8108  When the House Judiciary Committee held a hearing on social media censorship late last month, liberal Democratic congressman Ted Lieu transformed into a hardcore libertarian. “This is a stupid and ridiculous hearing,” he said, because “the First Amendment applies to the government, not private companies.” He added that just as the government cannot tell Fox News what content to air, “we can’t tell Facebook what content to filter,” because that would be unconstitutional. Lieu is incorrect. While the First Amendment generally does not apply to private companies, the Supreme Court has held it “does not disable the government from taking steps to ensure that private interests not restrict . . . the free flow of information and ideas.” But as Senator Ted Cruz points out, Congress actually has the power to deter political censorship by social media companies without using government coercion or taking action that would violate the First Amendment, in letter or spirit. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act immunizes online platforms for their users’ defamatory, fraudulent, or otherwise unlawful content. Congress granted this extraordinary benefit to facilitate “forum[s] for a true diversity of political discourse.” This exemption from standard libel law is extremely valuable to the companies that enjoy its protection, such as Google, Facebook, and Twitter, but they only got it because it was assumed that they would operate as impartial, open channels of communication—not curators of acceptable opinion.
    1
  12244. 1
  12245. 1
  12246. 1
  12247. 1
  12248. 1
  12249. 1
  12250. 1
  12251. 1
  12252. 1
  12253. 1
  12254. 1
  12255. 1
  12256. 1
  12257. 1
  12258. 1
  12259. 1
  12260. 1
  12261. 1
  12262. 1
  12263. 1
  12264. 1
  12265. 1
  12266. 1
  12267. 1
  12268. 1
  12269. 1
  12270. 1
  12271. 1
  12272. 1
  12273. 1
  12274. 1
  12275. 1
  12276. 1
  12277. 1
  12278. 1
  12279. 1
  12280. 1
  12281. 1
  12282. 1
  12283. 1
  12284. 1
  12285. 1
  12286. 1
  12287. 1
  12288. 1
  12289. 1
  12290. 1
  12291. 1
  12292. 1
  12293. 1
  12294. 1
  12295. 1
  12296. 1
  12297. 1
  12298. 1
  12299. 1
  12300. 1
  12301. 1
  12302. 1
  12303. 1
  12304. 1
  12305. 1
  12306. 1
  12307. 1
  12308. 1
  12309. 1
  12310. 1
  12311. 1
  12312. 1
  12313. 1
  12314. 1
  12315. 1
  12316. 1
  12317. 1
  12318. 1
  12319. 1
  12320. 1
  12321. 1
  12322. 1
  12323. 1
  12324. 1
  12325. 1
  12326. 1
  12327. 1
  12328. 1
  12329. 1
  12330. 1
  12331. 1
  12332. 1
  12333. 1
  12334. 1
  12335. 1
  12336. 1
  12337. 1
  12338. 1
  12339. 1
  12340. 1
  12341. 1
  12342. 1
  12343. 1
  12344. 1
  12345. 1
  12346. 1
  12347. 1
  12348. 1
  12349. 1
  12350. 1
  12351. 1
  12352. 1
  12353. 1
  12354. 1
  12355. 1
  12356. 1
  12357. 1
  12358. 1
  12359. 1
  12360. 1
  12361. 1
  12362. 1
  12363. 1
  12364. 1
  12365. 1
  12366. 1
  12367. 1
  12368. 1
  12369. 1
  12370. 1
  12371. 1
  12372. 1
  12373. 1
  12374. 1
  12375. 1
  12376. 1
  12377. 1
  12378. 1
  12379. 1
  12380. 1
  12381. 1
  12382. 1
  12383. 1
  12384. 1
  12385. 1
  12386. 1
  12387. 1
  12388. 1
  12389. 1
  12390. 1
  12391. 1
  12392. 1
  12393. 1
  12394. 1
  12395. 1
  12396. 1
  12397. 1
  12398. Australia doesn't have a defense treaty with Taiwan. Australia has a defense treaty with the US. US and Japan have a defense treaty. If Australia offers logistics support for the US, China will attack Australia. If Australian ships escort Australian loaded cargo ships to Japan in support of US/JP operations, China will attack Australia. If Australia enforces its own (trade) freedom of navigation with Japan during a conflict between US/JP vs CHina, China will attack Australia. The US is caught in a pickle i.e. It was the US that restricted Taiwan's nukes in exchange for military supply guarantees. It was the US that restricted Japan's nukes in exchange for security guarantees. Trump's solution is to allow these countries to be armed with their own nuke weapons and reduce the US's defense obligation. The Taiwan Relations Act does not guarantee the U.S. will intervene militarily if the PRC attacks or invades Taiwan nor does it relinquish it, as its primary purpose is to ensure the US's Taiwan policy will not be changed unilaterally by the president and ensure any decision to defend Taiwan will be made with the consent of Congress. The act states that "the United States will make available to Taiwan such defense articles and defense services in such quantity as may be necessary to enable Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capabilities". Reduced US defense obligation in the East Asian region yields Australia's reduced involvement in the East Asian region. If the US abandons Taiwan after the US restricted Taiwan's nuclear weapons, it signals the US allies to be armed with independent nuclear weapons and proves UK/France/Israel's independent nuclear weapons arguments. Again, Trump's solution is to allow the mentioned smaller countries to be armed with their own nuke weapons and reduce the US's defense obligation.
    1
  12399. 1
  12400. 1
  12401. 1
  12402. 1
  12403. 1
  12404. 1
  12405. 1
  12406. 1
  12407. 1
  12408. 1
  12409. 1
  12410. 1
  12411. 1
  12412. 1
  12413. 1
  12414. 1
  12415. 1
  12416. 1
  12417. 1
  12418. 1
  12419. 1
  12420. 1
  12421. 1
  12422. 1
  12423. 1
  12424. 1
  12425. 1
  12426. 1
  12427. 1
  12428. 1
  12429. 1
  12430. 1
  12431. 1
  12432. 1
  12433. 1
  12434. 1
  12435. 1
  12436. 1
  12437. 1
  12438. 1
  12439. 1
  12440. 1
  12441. 1
  12442. 1
  12443. 1
  12444. 1
  12445. 1
  12446. 1
  12447. 1
  12448. 1
  12449. 1
  12450. 1
  12451. 1
  12452. 1
  12453. 1
  12454. 1
  12455. 1
  12456. 1
  12457. 1
  12458. 1
  12459. 1
  12460. 1
  12461. 1
  12462. 1
  12463. 1
  12464. 1
  12465. 1
  12466. 1
  12467. 1
  12468. 1
  12469. 1
  12470. 1
  12471. 1
  12472. 1
  12473. 1
  12474. 1
  12475. 1
  12476. 1
  12477. 1
  12478. 1
  12479. 1
  12480. 1
  12481. 1
  12482. 1
  12483. 1
  12484. 1
  12485. 1
  12486. 1
  12487. 1
  12488. 1
  12489. 1
  12490. 1
  12491. 1
  12492. 1
  12493. 1
  12494. 1
  12495. 1
  12496. 1
  12497. 1
  12498. 1
  12499. 1
  12500. 1
  12501.  @gnbilios  Your " first preferences to jobs went to Asians" is technically incorrect, for specifics, read https://www.dfat.gov.au/trade/agreements/in-force/chafta/fact-sheets/Pages/chafta-fact-sheet-movement-of-natural-persons Specifically, China provides guaranteed access to Australian citizens and permanent residents for the following categories: # Intra-corporate transferees for up to three years (including executives, managers and specialists); # Contractual service suppliers, in certain sectors, for one year, or longer if stipulated under the relevant contract; # Installers and maintainers for up to 180 days; and Business visitors for up to 180 days. Furthermore, for the first time in any FTA, China guarantees equivalent entry and stay for dependants and spouses of Australians granted entry as intra-corporate transferees or contractual service suppliers for longer than 12 months. (while) Australia provides guaranteed access to Chinese citizens for the following categories: # Intra-corporate transferees and independent executives for up to four years (including executives, managers and specialists); # Contractual service suppliers for up to four years; including guaranteed access for up to a combined total of 1,800 per year in four occupations: Chinese chefs, WuShu martial arts coaches, Traditional Chinese Medicine practitioners and Mandarin language tutors (subject to meeting standard immigration requirements); Installers and servicers for up to 3 months; and # Business visitors for up to 90 days, or 6 months for business visitors who are service sellers. ----------------
    1
  12502. 1
  12503. 1
  12504. 1
  12505. 1
  12506. 1
  12507. 1
  12508. 1
  12509. 1
  12510. 1
  12511. 1
  12512. 1
  12513. 1
  12514. 1
  12515. 1
  12516. 1
  12517. 1
  12518. 1
  12519. 1
  12520. 1
  12521. 1
  12522. 1
  12523. 1
  12524. 1
  12525. 1
  12526. 1
  12527. 1
  12528. 1
  12529. 1
  12530. 1
  12531. 1
  12532. 1
  12533. 1
  12534. 1
  12535. 1
  12536. 1
  12537. 1
  12538. 1
  12539. 1
  12540. 1
  12541. @male princess CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  12542. 1
  12543. 1
  12544. 1
  12545. 1
  12546. 1
  12547. 1
  12548. 1
  12549. 1
  12550. 1
  12551. 1
  12552. 1
  12553. 1
  12554. 1
  12555. 1
  12556. 1
  12557. 1
  12558. 1
  12559. 1
  12560. 1
  12561. 1
  12562. 1
  12563. 1
  12564. 1
  12565. 1
  12566. 1
  12567. 1
  12568. 1
  12569. 1
  12570. 1
  12571. 1
  12572. 1
  12573. 1
  12574. 1
  12575. 1
  12576. 1
  12577. 1
  12578. 1
  12579. 1
  12580. 1
  12581. 1
  12582. 1
  12583. 1
  12584. 1
  12585. 1
  12586. 1
  12587. 1
  12588. 1
  12589. 1
  12590. 1
  12591. 1
  12592. 1
  12593. 1
  12594. 1
  12595. 1
  12596. 1
  12597. 1
  12598. 1
  12599. 1
  12600. 1
  12601. 1
  12602. 1
  12603. 1
  12604. 1
  12605. 1
  12606. 1
  12607. 1
  12608. 1
  12609. 1
  12610. 1
  12611. 1
  12612. 1
  12613. 1
  12614. 1
  12615. 1
  12616. 1
  12617. 1
  12618. 1
  12619. 1
  12620. 1
  12621. 1
  12622. 1
  12623. 1
  12624. 1
  12625. 1
  12626. 1
  12627. 1
  12628. 1
  12629. 1
  12630. 1
  12631. 1
  12632. 1
  12633. 1
  12634.  @CTimmerman  Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government (since its formation) had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq
    1
  12635. 1
  12636. 1
  12637. 1
  12638. 1
  12639. 1
  12640. 1
  12641. 1
  12642. 1
  12643. 1
  12644. 1
  12645. 1
  12646. 1
  12647. 1
  12648. 1
  12649. 1
  12650. 1
  12651.  @supremelyeducated3273  CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  12652.  I M Lovely  The statement "Anglos caused most of the world's problems." is FALSE. You injected racism into Cameron's statement. Cameron's real statement is "Britain caused many of world’s problems" and the context is in Pakistan. The problems in Muslim majority Pakistan vs Hindu majority India have existed BEFORE the British East India Company's arrival. David Cameron's appeasement statement is wrong. Sheikhdom of Kuwait (before WW1) Kuwait was founded in 1613 AD as a fishing village known as Grane (Kureyn). The region soon came under the rule of the Bani Khalid Emirate in 1670 after the expulsion of the Ottomans from Eastern Arabia (Lahsa Eyalet) by Barrack bin Ghurayr, Emir of the Bani Khalid, who successfully besieged the Ottoman governor Umar Pasha who surrendered and gave up his rule as the fourth Ottoman governor of al-Hasa. In 1752, Kuwait became independent after an agreement between the Sheikh of Kuwait and the Emir of Bani Khalid in which Bani Khalid recognised Sabah I bin Jaber's independent rule over Kuwait and in exchange Kuwait would not ally itself or support the enemies of Bani Khalid or interfere in the internal affairs of Bani Khalid in any way. Report: Saudi Arabia Presses U.S. on Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Date: January 19, 1992 From AP NEWS NEW YORK (AP) _ Saudi Arabia is pressuring the Bush administration to secretly arm and give intelligence to Iraqi opposition forces so they can work to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a newspaper reported Sunday. The Saudis want the United States to give arms and intelligence to Kurdish rebels in north Iraq, Shiite Muslim fighters in the south and Sunni Muslim opposition forces in central Iraq, the Times said, quoting U.S. and allied officials it didn’t name.
    1
  12653. 1
  12654. 1
  12655. As the CBS report showed, Palestinian Christians today have to speak out against “Israeli occupation,” because if they don’t, their silence will be perceived as pro-Israeli by the Muslims. Christian leaders don’t mention the fact that they have suffered the most from the mafia-style rule of Yasser Arafat’s kleptocracy, that slogans like “Islam will win” and “First the Saturday people then the Sunday People” have been painted on their churches, and that PLO flags were draped over crosses. After the 1948 war, Christian communities suffered most in the West Bank, not under “Israel’s occupation,” but because Muslim refugees were cynically settled in their midst by the Arab leadership. Ramallah was 90% Christian before the war, while Bethlehem was 80% Christian. By 1967, more than half of Bethlehem’s residents were Muslim, while Ramallah is a large Muslim city today. In a process of “Lebanonization,” Arafat changed Bethlehem’s demography by bringing in thousands of Muslims from refugee camps. Arafat then turned the city into a safe haven for suicide bombers and transformed the Greek Orthodox monastery, located next to the Church of Nativity, into his residence. Christian cemeteries and convents were desecrated and Christians became the PLO’s human shields. In the first year of the second Intifada, when Arafat’s terrorists ravaged Christian towns by gunfire and mortars, 1,640 Christians left Bethlehem and another 880 left Ramallah. In 2007, one year after Hamas’ Gaza takeover, the owner of the Strip’s only Christian bookstore was murdered. Christian shops and schools were firebombed. Ahmad El-Achwal is just one of the many Palestinians converted to Christianity killed by Islamic militants.
    1
  12656. 1
  12657. 1
  12658. 1
  12659. 1
  12660. 1
  12661. 1
  12662. 1
  12663. 1
  12664. 1
  12665. 1
  12666. 1
  12667. 1
  12668. 1
  12669. 1
  12670. 1
  12671. 1
  12672. 1
  12673. 1
  12674. 1
  12675. 1
  12676. 1
  12677. 1
  12678. 1
  12679. 1
  12680. 1
  12681. 1
  12682. 1
  12683. 1
  12684. 1
  12685. 1
  12686. 1
  12687. 1
  12688. 1
  12689. 1
  12690. 1
  12691. 1
  12692. 1
  12693. 1
  12694. 1
  12695. 1
  12696. 1
  12697. 1
  12698. 1
  12699. 1
  12700. 1
  12701. 1
  12702. 1
  12703. 1
  12704. 1
  12705. 1
  12706. @Nash Bridges >Afghanistan Osama Bin Laden's group in Afghanistan has executed strikes inside the US. >Libya NATO STOPPED the bloody civil war in Libya. Putin STARTED the bloody war in Ukraine. On 16 August 2003, Libya formally admitted responsibility for Pan Am Flight 103 (Lockabie bombing) in a letter presented to the president of the United Nations Security Council. "On 10 March 2011, France was the first country in the world to recognise the National Transitional Council as the legitimate government of Libya". United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 was adopted by the United Nations Security Council on 17 March 2011 in response to the First Libyan Civil War. The Security Council resolution was proposed by France, Lebanon, and the United Kingdom. Muammar Gaddafi played stupid games and win stupid prizes. >Iraq Iraq invaded Kuwait. Iraq STARTED the bloody war in Kuwait. Iraq's top oil exports countries from Jan to Jun 2020 1st, China! 29 million tonnes <---- LOL 2nd, India, 23 million tonnes 3rd, EU, 8 million tonnes 4th, South Korea, 6 million tonnes 5th, Turkey, 4 million tonnes with an upwards trend 5th, USA, 4 million tonnes with a downwards trend Report: Saudi Arabia Presses U.S. on Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Date: January 19, 1992 <----- note the 1992 year From AP NEWS NEW YORK (AP) _ Saudi Arabia is pressuring the Bush administration to secretly arm and give intelligence to Iraqi opposition forces so they can work to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a newspaper reported Sunday. The Saudis want the United States to give arms and intelligence to Kurdish rebels in north Iraq, Shiite Muslim fighters in the south and Sunni Muslim opposition forces in central Iraq, the Times said, quoting U.S. and allied officials it didn’t name.
    1
  12707. 1
  12708. 1
  12709. 1
  12710. 1
  12711. 1
  12712. 1
  12713. 1
  12714. 1
  12715. 1
  12716. 1
  12717. 1
  12718. 1
  12719. 1
  12720. 1
  12721. 1
  12722. 1
  12723. 1
  12724. 1
  12725. 1
  12726. 1
  12727. 1
  12728. 1
  12729. 1
  12730. 1
  12731. 1
  12732. 1
  12733. 1
  12734.  @MickDavies  It's you who is missing the point when battery technology improves over time e.g. Tesla's incoming 4680 battery tech. Tesla rolled out hundreds if not thousands of small improvements today that bring step change improvements to the fundamental building block of Tesla’s business — the battery cell. 14% improvement in cost/kWh coming from the change in cell form factor. 18% improvement in cost/kWh as a result of the 10× manufacturing footprint reduction and 10× manufacturing energy consumption reduction. The new dry manufacturing process enables pressing the active battery powder material directly into a film. The new manufacturing process is based on Maxwell Technologies’ proprietary “proof of concept” process. Process is not at production scale yet, but there is a “clear path” to large scale production. 5% improvement in cost/kWh coming from the increase utilization of silicon in the battery cells. 12% reduction in cost/kWh coming from improvements in the cathode material. 7% improvement in battery pack cost per kWh as a result of Tesla’s new integrated vehicle design. Tesla redesigned its vehicles using new front and rear castings that integrate with the battery pack. To accomplish this, Tesla developed a completely new alloy to enable casting of some of the largest components in the automotive space. These bolt directly into a new “structural battery,” eliminating the need for redundant, parallel elements in Teslas. All told, Tesla’s redesign of the battery, cathode, and vehicle frame translate to an expected improvement of 56% in Tesla’s cost per kWh.
    1
  12735. 1
  12736. 1
  12737. 1
  12738. 1
  12739. 1
  12740. 1
  12741. 1
  12742. 1
  12743.  @margaretcaine4219  You're incorrect. 1. KMT is overreaching its territorial claim since on the eve of the 1894 Sino-Japanese War, about 45 percent of the island was administered under the Manchus Qing administration (Imperial China) while the remaining land area was populated by Taiwanese aborigines. The U.S. position on Taiwan’s international status is “undetermined,” in accordance with the outcome of the 1951-52 San Francisco Peace Treaty. In that treaty, Japan had formally ceded sovereignty over the island, but it was not decided to whom. Most countries at the 1951 Peace Conference argued that Taiwan’s status needed to be determined in due time, in accordance with the principle of self-determination enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations. Post-WW2, Taiwan and the Pescadores islands are not handed to China, and KMT is a foreign government in exile under the American occupation of Japanese Taiwan islands. In Taiwan, the KMT government was politically defeated by partly aboriginal Taiwanese Tsai Ing-wen Democratic Progressive Party. On the eve of the 1894 Sino-Japanese War, about 45 percent of the island was administered under the Manchus Qing administration (Imperial China) while the remaining was populated by Taiwanese aborigines. Imperialist Manchus Qing's Imperial China didn't fully control Taiwan. 2. KMT was militarily defeated by CCP. KMT rejected CCP and it has runaway to "“undetermined" Formosa. 3. KMT was politically defeated by partly aboriginal Taiwanese Tsai Ing-wen Democratic Progressive Party.
    1
  12744. 1
  12745. 1
  12746. 1
  12747. 1
  12748. 1
  12749.  @stephenkolostyak4087  Legality In accordance with the provisions of Article 2 of San Francisco Peace Treaty, the Japanese formally renounced the territorial sovereignty of Taiwan and Penghu islands, and the treaty was signed in 1951 and came into force in 1952. At the date when the San Francisco Peace Treaty came into force, the political status of Taiwan and Penghu Islands was still uncertain.[358] The Republic of China and Japan signed the Treaty of Taipei on April 28, 1952, and the treaty came into force on August 5, which is considered by some as giving a legal support to the Republic of China's claim to Taiwan as "de jure" territory. The treaty stipulates that all treaties, conventions, and agreements between China and Japan prior to 9 December 1941 were null and void, which according to Hungdah Chiu, abolishes the Treaty of Shimonoseki ceding Taiwan to Japan. The interpretation of Taiwan becoming the Republic of China's '"de jure" territory is supported by several Japanese court decisions such as the 1956 Japan v. Lai Chin Jung case, which stated that Taiwan and the Penghu islands came to belong to the ROC on the date the Treaty of Taipei came into force.[361] Nevertheless, the official position of the Government of Japan is that Japan did not in the Treaty of Taipei express that Taiwan and Penghu belong to the Republic of China,[364] that the Treaty of Taipei could not make any disposition which is in violation of Japan's renouncing Taiwan and Penghu in San Francisco Peace Treaty,[365] and that the status of Taiwan and Penghu remain to be determined by the Allied Powers in the future. Writing in the American Journal of International Law, professors Jonathan I. Charney and J. R. V. Prescott argued that "none of the post–World War II peace treaties explicitly ceded sovereignty over the covered territories to any specific state or government." The Cairo Conference from November 22–26, 1943 in Cairo, Egypt was held to address the Allied position against Japan during World War II, and to make decisions about postwar Asia. One of the three main clauses of the Cairo Declaration was that "all the territories Japan has stolen from the Chinese, such as Manchuria, Formosa, and The Pescadores, shall be restored to the Republic of China". According to Taiwan Civil Society quoting the Taiwan Documents Project, the document was merely a statement of intent or non-binding declaration, for possible reference used for those who would draft the post-war peace treaty and that as a press release it was without force of law to transfer sovereignty from Taiwan to the Republic of China. Additional rationale to support this claim is that the Act of Surrender, and SCAP General Order no. 1, authorized the surrender of Japanese forces, not Japanese territories. In 1952, Winston Churchill said that Taiwan was not under Chinese sovereignty and the Chinese Nationalists did not represent the Chinese state, but that Taiwan was entrusted to the Chinese Nationalists as a military occupation. Churchill called the Cairo Declaration outdated in 1955. The legality of the Cairo Declaration was not recognized by the deputy prime minister of the United Kingdom, Anthony Eden, in 1955, who said there was a difference of opinion on which Chinese authority to hand it over to. In 1954, the United States denied that the sovereignty of Taiwan and the Penghu islands had been settled by any treaties, although it acknowledged that the Republic of China effectively controlled Taiwan and Penghu. In the 1960 Sheng v. Rogers case, it was stated that, in the view of the U.S. State Department, no agreement has purported to transfer the sovereignty of Taiwan to the ROC, though it accepted the exercise of Chinese authority over Taiwan and recognized the Government of the Republic of China as the legal government of China at the time. According to Vincent Wei-Cheng Wang, a minority of scholars and politicians have argued that the international status of Taiwan is still undecided, and that this has been used as an argument against the People's Republic of China's claim over Taiwan. They point to President Truman's statement on the pending status of Taiwan in 1950, the lack of specificity on whom the title of Taiwan was transferred to in the 1951 San Francisco peace treaty, and the absence of explicit provisions on the return of Taiwan to China in the 1952 Treaty of Taipei. However Wang notes that this is a weak argument, citing 2 LASSA OPPENHEIMER, INTERNATIONAL LAW, under the principle of effective occupation and control, if nothing is stipulated on conquered territory in the peace treaty, the possessor may annex it. Still, the notion that a possessor may annex a conquered territory despite the peace treaty not stipulating so, was a means of territorial transfer recognized by classical international law, and its legality in recent years is either not recognized or disputed. According to Jian-De Shen, applying such a notion on the Republic of China's territorial claim for Taiwan is invalid because the conqueror of World War II is the whole body of the Allied Powers rather than the Republic of China alone.
    1
  12750. 1
  12751. 1
  12752. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greensill_Capital Greensill Capital is another mismanaged company with a toxic debt chain. Exposure to GFG Alliance Until its insolvency, Greensill Capital, along with its German subsidiary Greensill Bank, had a significant exposure to GFG Alliance, a group of businesses associated with steel magnate Sanjeev Gupta. The exposure of Lex Greensill's firms to GFG Alliance totalled $5 billion.[26][27] Conversely, GFG Alliance depended heavily on financing by Greensill Capital to conduct its operations.[27] GFG Alliance relied especially on Greensill Capital's future accounts receivables finance program.[27][21] According to the Financial Times, defaults by GFG Alliance are partly responsible for Greensill Capital's ultimate insolvency.[28] On March 8, 2021, Bloomberg reported that GFG Alliance believed it would become insolvent if Greensill collapsed and had defaulted on some of its bonds.[29] In 2020, the German financial regulator BaFin opened an investigation into Greensill Bank's accounting. In March 2021, BaFin filed a criminal complaint against Greensill Bank and banned activity at the bank.[30][31][32] Insolvency In July 2020, a group of insurers led by Tokio Marine, which were insuring $4.6 billion of its working capital, announced to Greensill that it would stop providing the coverage.[19][33] The decision came after Tokio Marine discovered that an employee at one of its subsidiaries had provided coverage that exceeded its risk limits. Greensill tried to obtain an extension of the coverage, including by taking legal action against the insurers, but was ultimately unsuccessful.[33][21] After this failure, Greensill attempted to secure insurance from other firms, but did not succeed.[6] On March 1, 2021, Credit Suisse froze $10 billion in funds that were invested in Greensill's financial products and held by its supply-chain investment funds.[14][34] According to the Financial Times, "Credit Suisse’s concerns about the funds came to a head because insurance policies covering defaults in a portion of its assets lapsed over the weekend."[34] According to the Wall Street Journal, Credit Suisse was also concerned with Greensill's large exposure to companies tied to steel magnate Sanjeev Gupta.[14] In March 2021, Greensill considered filing for insolvency after the Credit Suisse freeze.[35] On March 1, 2021 The Wall Street Journal reported that Greensill appointed Grant Thornton to help it during a possible restructuring or insolvency filing which was expected to happen within a few days.[14] On March 2, Greensill Capital announced that it was considering selling the operating part of its business, according to a report by Bloomberg News, to Apollo Global Management or an associated firm, Athene Holdings. Greensill Capital stated the firms had a "period of exclusivity with a leading global financial institution with a view to concluding a transaction with them this week," regarding the sale.[36] On March 12th, it was announced that the deal with Athene had fallen through.[37] The deal collapsed in part due to the low value of Greensill's assets, which were further reduced by the preservation of technology firm Taulia, through a partnership between Taulia, JPMorgan Chase, and other banks.[38][39] Taulia facilitates lending from several finance companies to clients, but counted Greensill as a major source of business. With Greensill's role as a lender through Taulia taken over by JPMorgan, Athene had fewer reasons to acquire Greensill's book of business. On March 8, 2021, Greensill filed for insolvency protection, as it found itself unable to repay a $140 million loan to Credit Suisse and was "hit by defaults" from Sanjeev Gupta's GFG Alliance, one of its main customers.[2][28] Lawsuits and repercussions On March 15, 2021, Bluestone Resources Inc., a coal mining company owned by West Virginia governor Jim Justice, sued Greensill for fraud. It alleges that Greensill departed from standard supply chain finance to engage in a more speculative practice, offering loans not only based on debts that other companies had already incurred, but also based on transactions that Greensill predicted would occur in the future.[40][41] A number of German towns and cities pulled their money from small, private banks after losing millions of euros in the closure of Greensill.[42]
    1
  12753. From GPAS__2021 pdf Pension (mandated nanny state saving funds) vs GDP ratio for 2021 Five Eyes/Five Passport Group, Australia, $2,333 billion, 174.8% (CPTPP member, Nordic model). Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (USMCA, CPTPP member, Nordic model). United Kingdom, $3,564 billion, 135.1% (CPTPP member in July 2023, Nordic model). United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (USMCA member). (I don't have data for NZ) Notice the Five Eyes group has similar pension assets to GDP ratio results Large-scale mandated savings funds enable the government to issue government bonds and large-scale bond buyer markets! EU Finland, $279 billion, 104.3% (Nordic model). France, $166 billion, 6.5% Germany, $548 billion, 14.5% Italy, $231 billion, 12.5% <----- PIIGS Netherlands, $1,900 billion, 214.4%, (Nordic model). Ireland, $197 billion, 49.4% <----- PIIGS Spain, $44 billion, 3.6% <----- PIIGS The EU lacks strategic savings coordination. Non-EU, Europe Switzerland, $1,163 billion, 164.3% (Nordic model). North America Mexico, $259 billion, 24.9% (USMCA, CPTPP member,) Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (USMCA, CPTPP member, Nordic model). United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (USMCA member). South America Brazil, $195 billion,14.3% Chile, $243 billion, 99.2% (CPTPP member). East Asia, South East Asia China, $285 billion, 1.9% Hong Kong, $199 billion, 58.3% Japan, $3,613 billion, 73.6% (CPTPP member). South Korea, $968 billion, 61.0% Malaysia, $279 billion, 83.0% (CPTPP member). South-Central Asia India, $184 billion, 7.1%
    1
  12754. 1
  12755. 1
  12756. 1
  12757. 1
  12758. 1
  12759. 1
  12760. 1
  12761. 1
  12762. 1
  12763. 1
  12764. 1
  12765. 1
  12766. 1
  12767. 1
  12768. 1
  12769. 1
  12770. 1
  12771. 1
  12772. 1
  12773. 1
  12774. 1
  12775. 1
  12776. 1
  12777. 1
  12778. 1
  12779. 1
  12780. 1
  12781. 1
  12782. 1
  12783.  @puzzled012  >yeah, Germany on war path again, it went well previously Germany doesn't have access to British Empire's mineral and hydrocarbon wealth. Combined CANZUK group supplying the German Army would be different from WW1 and WW2 German Army. Hilter wanted Germany + British Empire Germanic federation to wipe out the Slavs, but the UK has a major disagreement with Germany on Polska's question. Joseph Stalin's nightmare has been materialized when Germany and the rest of the Germanic majority CANZUK and USA are on the German side. The USA is the largest Germanic majority country in the world and it's backing Germany. Putin's action has awaken Germany from its shopkeeper mindset and Germany has CANZUK and USA on its side. ------ 19 December 1991: Germany announces that it will recognize Croatia on January 15, 1992, with or without the rest of the European Community. 23 December 1991: Germany becomes the first major power to recognize Croatia and Slovenia as independent states 15 January 1992: The European Community recognizes Slovenia and Croatia. Without NATO (and the U.S.), Germany would have done it alone and we would have another WW1 trigger i.e. Russia would have declared war against Germany as in WWI. Germany used NATO with North America's raw material security guarantees to further its own interest when it failed in WW1's goals. In one moment in time, Germany was leading NATO to wreaked Yugoslavia and has fulfilled its WW1 goals. Russia knows the decoupling of North America's raw material security guarantees from mainland Europe will enable Russia to win any war of attrition against Germany! Germany is not stupid. As long Germany is friendly with Poland, USA/CANZUK group would be friendly with Germany. Hint: Hunder Biden loves fking Russian women and Trump has Melania who is Slovene (south Slavs)).
    1
  12784. 1
  12785. 1
  12786. 1
  12787. 1
  12788. 1
  12789. 1
  12790. 1
  12791.  @kavatr  UK leaving the EU and joining CPTPP proves freedom of association. Biden admin's US rejected UK's attempt to join USMCA. Before Euromaidan, Russia, however, has successfully used political and economic leverage to dissuade Ukraine from signing the E.U. deal. In the months prior to the Vilnius summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a trade war with Kiev, blocking nearly all imports from Ukraine and cutting energy supplies to the country. In turn, this reduced Ukrainian exports by 25 percent and shrank the economy by 1.5 percent. Some trade background for the context From Tradebarrier Index (lower score = less trade barriers) New Zealand's tariff score is 2.92 Australia's tariff score is 3.03 UK's tariff score is 3.94 (after Brexit) Japan's tariff score is 4.05 US's tariff score is 4.54 Germany's tariff score is 4.88 EU's tariff score is 4.88 Russia's tariff score is 6.16 <-------- China's tariff score is 6.8 <------ Russia wants to maintain its higher trade protectionist policies. ------ Victoria Nuland herself doesn't have the power, but about 73% of the MPs—voted to "remove Viktor Yanukovych from the post of president of Ukraine" has the power. Don't assume Ukraine's president has absolute power when 73% of the MPs have voted to "remove Viktor Yanukovych from the post of president of Ukraine". ------ Ukraine Constitution 1991, Article 17, disallows foreign military bases after 2017. According to former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, Ukraine's constitution forbids the country from hosting foreign military bases after 2017. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1991, Article 17. In 2018, President Petro Poroshenko's constitution amendment allowed temporary foreign military bases. Yanukovych is an idiot.
    1
  12792. 1
  12793. 1
  12794. 1
  12795. 1
  12796. 1
  12797. 1
  12798.  @startingbark0356  USA production is more than 4 times since the US was the only nation to mass-produced aircraft carriers. Germany Panzer VII Tiger II tank has 492 units x 68 tons = 33,456 tons Panzer VI Tiger I tank has 1,347 units x 44 tons = 59,268 tons Panzer V Panther tank has 6000 units x 44 tons = 264,000 tons Panzer IV has 8,553 unit x 25 tons = 213,825 tons Total: 570,549 tons Czech's Panzer 38(t) has 1414 units x 10 tons = 141,40 tons USA M26 tanks has 2,212 units x 44 tons = 97,328 tons M26 has 90 mm gun. M4 tanks has 49,234 units x 33 tons = 1,624,722, Russian T34 tanks has similar number. M10 tank destroyer has 6,406 units x 29 tons = 185,774 tons M18 tank destroyer has 2,507 units x 39 tons = 97,773 tons M36 tank destroyer has 2,324 units x 29 tons = 67,396 tons M36 has 90 mm gun. Sub-Total: 2,072,993 tons M4 Sherman Firefly (UK) has 2,200 units x 35 tons = 77,000 tons. Firefly takes on Tiger I and Panther tanks. The US has both quality (M26) and numbers (M4). A significant amount of the US Army's tonnage was against the German army. The US has the following aircraft carrier production 24 Essex-class fleet carriers with 90 to 110 aircraft each. 650,400 tons for Essex-class. 21 Commencement Bay class with 228,900 tons 50 Casablanca-class with 390,000 tons. 45 Bogue-class with 747,900 tons 3 Yorktown-class fleet carriers with 59,400 tons Sub-Total: 3,798,645 tons Modern-day USN aircraft carrier tonnage is just about 1,460,000 tons. A significant amount of USN's tonnage was against the Japanese navy. WW2 UK has similar aircraft carrier builds as Imperial Japan i.e. around 10 to 11 units. Not including UK, US and Canada other surface combat ships e.g. destroyers, heavy cruisers, battleships and 'etc'. Grand Total: 5,871,638 tons For the US, that's already 10.3X times over Germany's iron/steel tonnage extract/production.
    1
  12799. 1
  12800. 1
  12801. 1
  12802. 1
  12803. 1
  12804. 1
  12805. 1
  12806. 1
  12807. 1
  12808. 1
  12809. 1
  12810. 1
  12811. 1
  12812. 1
  12813. 1
  12814. 1
  12815. 1
  12816. 1
  12817. 1
  12818. 1
  12819. 1
  12820. 1
  12821. 1
  12822. 1
  12823. 1
  12824. 1
  12825. 1
  12826. 1
  12827. 1
  12828. 1
  12829. 1
  12830. 1
  12831. 1
  12832. 1
  12833. 1
  12834. 1
  12835. 1
  12836. 1
  12837. 1
  12838. 1
  12839. 1
  12840. 1
  12841. 1
  12842. 1
  12843. 1
  12844. 1
  12845. 1
  12846. 1
  12847. 1
  12848. 1
  12849. 1
  12850. 1
  12851. 1
  12852. 1
  12853. 1
  12854. 1
  12855. 1
  12856. 1
  12857. 1
  12858. 1
  12859. 1
  12860. 1
  12861. 1
  12862. 1
  12863. 1
  12864. 1
  12865. 1
  12866. 1
  12867. 1
  12868. 1
  12869. 1
  12870. 1
  12871. 1
  12872. 1
  12873. 1
  12874. 1
  12875. 1
  12876. 1
  12877. 1
  12878. 1
  12879. 1
  12880. 1
  12881. 1
  12882. 1
  12883. 1
  12884. 1
  12885. 1
  12886. 1
  12887. 1
  12888. 1
  12889. 1
  12890. 1
  12891. 1
  12892. 1
  12893. 1
  12894. 1
  12895. 1
  12896. 1
  12897. 1
  12898.  @jfangm  >The F-35 is also smaller and lighter F-35C has low wing loading like F-22A and F-15C. F-35C has about 79% of F-22A's wing area. F-35C has about 79% of F-22A's empty weight. F-35C has 58% of F-22A's engine thrust. USN is funding engine upgrades for F-35C since it's underpowered for its wing area. US Navy managed to spec'ed a low wing load design within the JSF program. Meanwhile, F-35A has a 1.5X scale design rule for empty weight, wing area, and engine thrust from F-16C Block 50. F-35C should have been F-36 since it doesn't share wing and tail designs with F-35A. >And I wouldn't bring up the F-35, considering it can't even outfly the F-16 That's FALSE. Quoting Out Of The Shadows: RNLAF experiences with the F-35A - Combat Aircraft Magazine May 2018 specifically against David Axe's report Knight divulged a little more information about flying basic fighter manoeuvres (BFM) in an F-35. 'When our envelope was cleared to practise BFM we got the opportunity to fight some fourth-generation fighters. Remember, back the rumors were that the F-35 was a pig. The first time the opponents showed up [in the training area] they had wing tanks along with a bunch of missiles. I guess they figured that being in a dirty configuration wouldn't really matter and that they would still easily outmanoeuvre us. By the end of the week, though, they had dropped their wing tanks, transitioned to a single centerline fuel tank and were still doing everything they could not to get gunned by us. A week later they stripped the jets clean of all external stores, which made the BFM fights interesting, to say the least 1. Lightest empty weight F-16A MLU air-superiority model needs to be clean (no external weapons, no external tanks) to make visual range dogfight interesting against combat loaded F-35A Block 3F. 2. Dutch has acknowledged early F-35 Block builds being beaten by F-16s with external fuel tanks which are NOT applicable for F-35A Block 3F build. Don't use Block 2A/2B/3i numbers!
    1
  12899. 1
  12900.  @jfangm  > From a bird's eye view, there was no reason to NOT merge the two requirements That's a flawed argument since engineering is about small details. This is why Elon Musk hates MBAs. > It should have been developed as the Navy version and lightened into the Air Force model. That's a flawed argument when the Navy version has other design requirements e.g. high lift feature at slow speeds. Hornet's less swept-wing design provides higher lift at a slower speed at expense of acceleration, hence the reason for YF-17 and the resulting F/A-18A was suitable for the navy usage. F-14 has a less swept-wing mode that provides higher lift at slow speeds with extra complexity from variable wing design i.e. F-14 is limited by 7.3G. F-35C has a different wing design from the F-35A model due to the US Navy's different requirements. -------- In terms of aerodynamic performance, the F-35 is an excellent machine, Beesley said. Having previously been only the second man ever to have flown the F-22 Raptor, Beesley became the first pilot ever to fly the F-35 in late 2006. As such, Beesley is intimately familiar with both programs. According to Beesley, the four current test pilots for F-35 have been most impressed by the aircraft's thrust and acceleration. In the subsonic flight regime, the F-35 very nearly matches the performance of its' larger, more powerful cousin, the F-22 Raptor, Beesley explained. The "subsonic acceleration is about as good as a clean Block 50 F-16 or a Raptor- which is about as good as you can get." Beesley said. --------- F-35A Block 3F will beat Eurofighter in acceleration. F-16 vs F-35A (Block 3i state) from Norwegian pilot. I quote Overall, flying the F-35 reminds me a bit of flying the F/A-18 Hornet, but with an important difference: It has been fitted with a turbo
    1
  12901. 1
  12902. 1
  12903. 1
  12904. 1
  12905. 1
  12906. 1
  12907.  @jfangm  >The F-16 literally had a handicap and the F-35 couldn't win. Quoting Out Of The Shadows: RNLAF experiences with the F-35A - Combat Aircraft Magazine May 2018 specifically against David Axe's report Knight divulged a little more information about flying basic fighter manoeuvres (BFM) in an F-35. 'When our envelope was cleared to practise BFM we got the opportunity to fight some fourth-generation fighters. Remember, back the rumors were that the F-35 was a pig. The first time the opponents showed up [in the training area] they had wing tanks along with a bunch of missiles. I guess they figured that being in a dirty configuration wouldn't really matter and that they would still easily outmanoeuvre us. By the end of the week, though, they had dropped their wing tanks, transitioned to a single centerline fuel tank and were still doing everything they could not to get gunned by us. A week later they stripped the jets clean of all external stores, which made the BFM fights interesting, to say the least. ---- 1. Lightest empty weight F-16A MLU air-superiority model needs to be clean (no weapons, no external tanks) to make visual range dogfight interesting against combat loaded F-35A Block 3F. 2. Dutch has acknowledged early F-35 Block builds being beaten by F-16s with external fuel tanks which are NOT applicable for F-35A Block 3F build. Don't use Block 2A/2B/3i numbers! Unlike my comments, you didn't identify the specific F-35A unit and development phase date range in David Axe's Q1 2015 report! Your narrative is FALSE
    1
  12908. 1
  12909. 1
  12910. 1
  12911. 1
  12912. 1
  12913. 1
  12914. 1
  12915. 1
  12916. 1
  12917. 1
  12918. 1
  12919. 1
  12920. 1
  12921. 1
  12922. 1
  12923. 1
  12924. 1
  12925. 1
  12926. 1
  12927. 1
  12928. 1
  12929.  @kedsau  Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country".[8] You're a hypocrite.
    1
  12930. 1
  12931. 1
  12932. 1
  12933. 1
  12934. 1
  12935. 1
  12936. 1
  12937. 1
  12938. 1
  12939. 1
  12940. 1
  12941. 1
  12942. 1
  12943. 1
  12944. 1
  12945. 1
  12946. 1
  12947. 1
  12948. 1
  12949. 1
  12950. 1
  12951. 1
  12952. 1
  12953. 1
  12954. 1
  12955. 1
  12956. 1
  12957. 1
  12958. 1
  12959. 1
  12960. 1
  12961. 1
  12962. 1
  12963. 1
  12964. 1
  12965. 1
  12966. 1
  12967. 1
  12968. 1
  12969. 1
  12970. 1
  12971. 1
  12972. 1
  12973. 1
  12974. 1
  12975. 1
  12976. 1
  12977. 1
  12978. 1
  12979. 1
  12980. 1
  12981. 1
  12982. 1
  12983. 1
  12984. 1
  12985. 1
  12986. 1
  12987. 1
  12988. 1
  12989. 1
  12990. 1
  12991. 1
  12992. 1
  12993. 1
  12994. 1
  12995. 1
  12996. 1
  12997. 1
  12998. 1
  12999.  @tracer7898 For Iraq issue Date: December 2005, Dutch dealer gets 15 years for chemical sales to Saddam. A Dutch businessman was yesterday jailed for 15 years after a court in The Hague found him guilty of complicity in war crimes for selling chemicals to Iraq that Saddam Hussein's regime used in lethal gas attacks on Kurdish villages. -------- Iraq invaded Kuwait, fool Sheikhdom of Kuwait BEFORE WW1 Kuwait was founded in 1613 AD as a fishing village known as Grane (Kureyn). The region soon came under the rule of the Bani Khalid Emirate in 1670 after the expulsion of the Ottomans from Eastern Arabia (Lahsa Eyalet) by Barrack bin Ghurayr, Emir of the Bani Khalid, who successfully besieged the Ottoman governor Umar Pasha who surrendered and gave up his rule as the fourth Ottoman governor of al-Hasa. In 1752, Kuwait became independent after an agreement between the Sheikh of Kuwait and the Emir of Bani Khalid in which Bani Khalid recognised Sabah I bin Jaber's independent rule over Kuwait and in exchange Kuwait would not ally itself or support the enemies of Bani Khalid or interfere in the internal affairs of Bani Khalid in any way. -------- Report: Saudi Arabia Presses U.S. on Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Date: January 19, 1992 From AP NEWS NEW YORK (AP) _ Saudi Arabia is pressuring the Bush administration to secretly arm and give intelligence to Iraqi opposition forces so they can work to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a newspaper reported Sunday. The Saudis want the United States to give arms and intelligence to Kurdish rebels in north Iraq, Shiite Muslim fighters in the south and Sunni Muslim opposition forces in central Iraq, the Times said, quoting U.S. and allied officials it didn’t name. ------ Try again, fool
    1
  13000. 1
  13001. 1
  13002.  @tracer7898  >you never heard of WMD Date: March 2017 Kurdistan’s Interior Minister said on Tuesday the Regional Government since its formation had demanded from the federal government to pay compensation to the families of Kurdish victims who suffered genocide, killing, and displacement from the former Iraqi regime. Rebar Ahmed stressed during the Parliament session that in 2014 “we decided to announce Halabja as a governorate,… but perhaps the big problem facing Halabja is that Iraq is not yet ready to recognize it as a governorate. Therefore, the federal government did not allocate a financial budget for it.” Ahmed continued that when the first Kurdish delegation went to Baghdad, it delivered the Prime Minister a request to compensate the victims of the people of Kurdistan with 380 billion dollars for the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein's regime in Halabja, Anfal and to Barzanis, Faili Kurds, and all victims of Baath crimes. The Halabja chemical attack, also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in the Kurdish city of Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents. The incident was the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history, killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Preliminary results from surveys of the affected region showed an increased rate of cancer and birth defects in the years afterward. The Halabja attack has been officially defined by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people in Iraq
    1
  13003. 1
  13004. 1
  13005. 1
  13006.  @ttuliorancao  Participants in Operation Enduring Freedom. NATO Article V is only against Afghanistan. Bulgaria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom, and the United States. ----- Russia provided a field hospital as well as a hospital in Kabul for allies and Afghan civilians. Russia has also agreed to provide logistic support for the United States forces in Afghanistan to aid in anti-terrorist operations. Russia allowed US and NATO forces to pass through its territory to go to Afghanistan. Russian Special Forces also assisted US and Afghan forces in operations in Afghanistan, by helping with intel and studying the lay of the land. Like Ukraine, Russia was a partner with NATO during the Bush Jr era. Participants in Operation Enduring Freedom's full list. 1 Afghanistan 2 Albania 3 Australia 4 Armenia 5 Azerbaijan 6 Bangladesh 7 Bulgaria 8 Belgium 9 Bosnia and Herzegovina 10 Canada 11 People's Republic of China 12 Cyprus 13 Czech Republic 14 Denmark 15 Egypt 16 Estonia 17 France 18 Georgia 19 Germany 20 Greece 21 Hungary 22 India 23 Iran 24 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Japan 27 Kuwait 28 Kyrgyzstan 29 Latvia 30 Lithuania 31 North Macedonia 32 Malaysia 33 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 35 New Zealand 36 Norway 37 Oman 38 Pakistan 39 Poland 40 Portugal 41 Qatar 42 Romania 43 Russia 44 Slovakia 45 Slovenia 46 South Korea 47 Spain 48 Sudan 49 Sweden 50 Switzerland 51 Tajikistan 52 Thailand 53 Turkey 54 Turkmenistan 55 United Arab Emirates 56 Ukraine 57 United Kingdom 58 United States You are wrong.
    1
  13007. 1
  13008. 1
  13009. 1
  13010. 1
  13011. 1
  13012. 1
  13013. 1
  13014. 1
  13015. 1
  13016. 1
  13017. 1
  13018. 1
  13019. 1
  13020. 1
  13021. 1
  13022. 1
  13023. 1
  13024. 1
  13025. 1
  13026. 1
  13027. 1
  13028. 1
  13029. 1
  13030. 1
  13031. 1
  13032. 1
  13033. 1
  13034. 1
  13035. 1
  13036. 1
  13037. 1
  13038. 1
  13039. 1
  13040. 1
  13041.  @johntowers1213  The restart of Nord Stream, and its subsequent decline to flows of 30-32 MMcm/d, meant that flows via Nord Stream in late July were lower than via Ukraine (around 37 MMcm/d since 1 June) and also lower than flows via Turkish Stream at the Turkey-Bulgaria border (42-43 MMcm/d since 12 July). With flows to Latvia of around 7-8 MMcm/d, this suggests that, from 27 July, total Russian pipeline gas flows to Europe (excluding Turkey) were around 117-118 MMcm/d. Of this volume, Nord Stream accounted for 26 per cent.48 With the flow to Latvia halted, the total volume delivered by pipeline from Russia to Europe on 31 July was 109 MMcm, of which 30 MMcm was delivered via Nord Stream, 37 MMcm via Velké Kapušany on the Ukraine-Slovakia border, and 42 MMcm via Turkish Stream on the TurkeyBulgaria border.49 A key conclusion to be drawn at this point is that the decline in flows via Nord Stream cannot be seen in isolation. It is part of a broader decline in the physical flow of Russian pipeline gas to north-western and central Europe. With the Yamal-Europe pipeline closed and transit via Ukraine seemingly capped at 77 MMcm/d, the operation of Nord Stream at a reduced capacity of 33 MMcm/d means that the flow of Russian gas to north-western and central Europe is effectively capped at 110 MMcm/d. This is far below the 255 MMcm/d that was delivered via Nord Stream, via Yamal-Europe (at Mallnow), and via Ukraine (at Uzhhorod/Velké Kapušany, net of reverse flows at Budince) in Q4-2021.50 If the Nord Stream capacity is not raised before the end of summer, this paints a concerning picture for Russian gas supply to north-western and central Europe in the coming winter, as it foreshadows a significant year-on-year decline in Q4-2022 ----- Fukcoff clown.
    1
  13042. 1
  13043. 1
  13044. 1
  13045. 1
  13046. 1
  13047. 1
  13048. 1
  13049. 1
  13050. 1
  13051. 1
  13052. 1
  13053. 1
  13054. 1
  13055. 1
  13056. 1
  13057. 1
  13058. 1
  13059. 1
  13060. 1
  13061. 1
  13062. 1
  13063. 1
  13064. 1
  13065. 1
  13066. 1
  13067. 1
  13068. 1
  13069. 1
  13070. 1
  13071. 1
  13072. 1
  13073. 1
  13074. 1
  13075. 1
  13076. 1
  13077. 1
  13078. 1
  13079. 1
  13080. 1
  13081. 1
  13082. 1
  13083. 1
  13084. 1
  13085. 1
  13086. 1
  13087.  @PlaYer-sn5or  Against point 3, Your narrative is FALSE. Chiang Kai-Shek Supplementing The Act Of Surrender 1945 excluded Manchuria, Formosa, and French Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude. Order Of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-Shek Supplementing The Act Of Surrender 1945 This is order No. 1 of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek to the Japanese forces in China, excluding Manchuria, Formosa, and French Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude, which were surrendered under the act of 9 September 1945. This order supplements the acts of surrender to the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers and his General Order No. 1. September 9, 1945 Order of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek supplementing the Act of Surrender 9 September 1945 Immediately following the signing of the Act of Surrender ending the war in the China Theatre, General Ho Ying-chen handed Order No. 1 of Generalissimo Chiang to Lieut. Gen. Okamura Yasutsugu as a supplement to the Act of Surrender. I. This is order No. 1 of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek to the Japanese forces in China, excluding Manchuria, Formosa, and French Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude, which were surrendered under the act of 9 September 1945. This order supplements the acts of surrender to the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers and his General Order No. 1. II. The Japanese Commanders surrendering the Japanese forces in the areas named above will issue the following order to and insure compliance of such order by all forces under their command. 1. The Emperor of Japan, the Japanese government and the Japanese Imperial General Headquarters have recognized complete military defeat of the Japanese military forces by the Allied forces and have surrendered unconditionally all Japanese forces to the Allied Powers. 2. All the Japanese ground, sea, air, and auxiliary forces within China, excluding Manchuria, Formosa and Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude, have been surrendered unconditionally to Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek and henceforth all such surrendered Japanese forces will be subject to the control of the Generalissimo. Their movements and activities will be dictated by him, and they will obey only orders or proclamations issued or authorized by him, or orders of their Japanese commanders based upon his instructions. 3. The surrendered Japanese forces are now non-combatant troops and all hostilities will cease. All such Japanese forces will remain at the stations they now occupy and await further orders from the Generalissimo. They will assemble, preserve without damage, and turn over to forces specified by the Generalissimo all arms, ammunition, equipment, supplies, records, information and assets of any kind belonging to the Japanese forces and auxiliaries. 4. All Japanese aircraft, naval units and merchant ships in the areas named above will be held without damage where they are at present located, except those stated in the Generalissimo’s proclamation No. 1. Boats on the Yangtze will be assembled at Ichang. Explosives aboard vessels will be removed immediately to safe storage ashore. 5. Commanders of the Japanese military units and civilian auxiliaries will maintain discipline and order and will be responsible for the behaviour of their troops. They will see that their forces do not harm or molest inhabitants, or pillage, loot, or bring unauthorized damage to their property. 6. With respect to the United Nations prisoners of war and civilian internees in the hands of the Japanese or Japanese controlled authorities: 1. The safety and well being of all United Nations prisoners of war and civilian internees will be scrupulously preserved, to include the administrative and supply services essential to provide adequate food, shelter, clothing, and medical care until such responsibility is undertaken by the Generalissimo or his authorized representatives. 2. Each camp or other place of detention of United Nations prisoners of war and civilian internees together with its equipment, stores, records, arms, and ammunition will be delivered immediately to the command of the senior officer or designated representative of the prisoners of war and civilian internees. 3. As directed by the Generalissimo, or his duly authorized representatives, prisoners of war and civilian internees will be transported to places of safety where they can be accepted by Allied authorities. 4. The Supreme Headquarters in China, Formosa and Indochina of each of the Japanese military forces and auxiliaries which have surrendered to the Generalissimo will furnish him within time limit of this order, complete lists' of all United Nations prisoners of war and civilian internees indicating their location. 7. Pending further orders the Japanese forces surrendered to the Generalissimo will continue to operate their lines of services and supply essential to provide food, clothing, medical and other subsistence supplies to feed and supply their own forces and persons for whom they are responsible. 8. Responsible Japanese or Japanese controlled military and civil authorities will insure that: 1. All Japanese mines and minefields and other obstacles to movement by land, sea, and air, wherever located will be removed according to instructions of the Generalissimo or his representatives. 2. All safety lanes are to be kept open and clearly marked pending accomplishment of the above. 3. All land, water, and air transportation and communications facilities and equipment are to be held intact and maintained in good condition. 4. All military installations and establishment including airfields, seaplane bases, aircraft defences, ports and naval bases, storage depots, permanent and temporary land end coastal fortifications, fortresses, and other fortifications, installations and establishments, all factories, plants, ships, research institutions, laboratories, testing storage depots, permanent and plans, drawings and inventions designed or intended to produce or to facilitate the production on and of all implements of war and other material and property used by or intended for use by military or semi-military organizations in connection with its operations are to be held intact and maintained in good condition. III. The Supreme Headquarters in China, Formosa, and French Indo-China of the forces which have been surrendered to the Generalissimo within the time limit of the receipt of this order will furnish complete information for their respective areas concerning the following: 1. Lists of all land, air, and anti-aircraft units showing locations and strengths in officers and men. 2. Lists of all aircraft military, naval, and civil, giving complete information as to the number, type, location, and condition of such aircraft. 3. Lists of all Japanese and Japanese controlled naval vessels, surface and submarines and auxiliary naval craft in or out of commission and under construction, giving their position and condition. 4. List of, and position and condition of, all Japanese and Japanese controlled merchant ships of over 100 gross tonnes in or out of commission and under construction, including merchant ships formerly belonging to any of the United Nations which are now in the Japanese hands. 5. Complete and detailed information accompanied by maps, showing locations and layouts of all the mines, minefields, and other obstacles to movement by land, sea, or air, and the safety lanes in connection therewith. 6. Locations and descriptions of all military installations and establishments, including airfields, seaplane bases, anti-aircraft defenses, ports and naval bases, storage depots, permanent and temporary land and coast fortifications, fortresses and other fortified areas. 7. Location of all camps and other places of detention of United Nations prisoners of war and civilian internees required under paragraph II F above. IV. The Supreme Headquarters in China, Formosa, and Indo-China of the forces surrendered to the Generalissimo shall be prepared, on instructions from the occupation commanders representing the Generalissimo to furnish the names and addresses of Japanese civilians residing in their respective areas and to collect and deliver all arms in the possession of such Japanese civilian population. The Headquarters named above will immediately notify all Japanese civilians that until further notice from appropriate authorities representing the Generalissimo they will remain in the vicinity of their present residence and will keep the local Japanese commander advised of their whereabouts. CHIANG KAI-SHEK
    1
  13088. 1
  13089. 1
  13090. 1
  13091. 1
  13092. 1
  13093. 1
  13094. 1
  13095. 1
  13096. 1
  13097. 1
  13098. 1
  13099. 1
  13100. 1
  13101. 1
  13102. 1
  13103. 1
  13104. 1
  13105. 1
  13106. 1
  13107. 1
  13108.  @devilmansanchez  China, https://www.forbes.com/sites/douglasbulloch/2016/10/12/protectionism-may-be-rising-around-the-world-but-in-china-it-never-went-away/#5dc3f5df73da Protectionism May Be Rising Around The World, But In China It Never Went Away Promises unkept? Since joining the WTO in 2001, China has repeatedly insisted that it will live up to those undertakings made on entry. In particular, the use of currency manipulation has been identified by the US as a breech of the commitment to end price controls for the purposes of protecting domestic industries. This became a major political issue from 2005 onwards, and has only recently subsided because it is assumed that the RMB is slightly overvalued on the market. Nevertheless, for years it was deliberate policy for the PBoC to accumulate US Dollars and suppress the exchange rate for the RMB, resulting in exactly the price distortions China had committed to eliminate in 2001, and fuelling an enormous trade surplus with the US, which persists and expands to this day. Furthermore TRIPS implementation has been given some effect on paper, but has made little progress when it comes to 'enforcement.' This is (according to the WTO) as recently as February 2015, fully 14 years after TRIPS was supposed to be already in effect. The US Trade Representative produces an annual report to Congress on China's WTO compliance which leaves little room to conclude they have so far lived up to their accession commitments. The most recent several-hundred-page document - produced in December 2015 - recites a long list of small measures, committees established, announcements made and new administrative complications faced, all continuing disputes over an agreement theoretically in effect since 2001. Although, therefore, protectionism is rising around the world, it is also true to say that existing practices of protectionism have not fallen in the way that they should have since China's accession to the WTO in 2001. Because of this lack of progress in easing trade, the extended period of currency manipulation, the lack of observance of TRIPS and the sheer administrative resistance exporters face when trying to get their products into China, we now face of world of highly unbalanced trade, and rising mistrust. And it is this that is leading to rising protectionism; the simple fact that it never went away.
    1
  13109. 1
  13110. 1
  13111. 1
  13112. 1
  13113. 1
  13114. The US, UK and Russia signed Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum that traded Ukraine's nuclear weapons for security assurances. Russia has exited Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum. France and China have signed a watered-down Budapest Memorandum. US, UK, and France are "respecting" Ukraine's territorial integrity and support "security assurance" for Ukraine and you can't say the same for Russia. US EXIT from Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum has a negative outcome for any non-NATO US allies being in the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). Budapest Memorandum's complete failure will reinforce arguments for independent nuclear weapons for smaller countries. --------- Before Euromaidan, Russia started a trade war against Ukraine, forcing Yanukovych to sign a base rental extension agreement that breached Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 disallows foreign military bases after 2017. Read the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17 which disallows foreign military bases after 2017. CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on 28 June 1996 Article 17 The location of foreign military bases shall not be permitted on the territory of Ukraine. Yanukovych breached the Ukraine Constitution 1996, Article 17. After 2017, Ukraine's constitution is incompatible with foreign military bases hosting either NATO or CSTO. If Yanukovych didn't sign the military base rental extension, Russia would be kicked out of Crimea. Putin's narrative is FALSE. Putin's pressure caused Yanukovych to make a mistake.
    1
  13115. 1
  13116. 1
  13117. 1
  13118. 1
  13119. 1
  13120. 1
  13121. 1
  13122. 1
  13123. 1
  13124. 1
  13125. 1
  13126. 1
  13127. 1
  13128. 1
  13129. 1
  13130. 1
  13131. 1
  13132. 1
  13133. 1
  13134. 1
  13135. 1
  13136. 1
  13137. 1
  13138. 1
  13139. 1
  13140. 1
  13141. 1
  13142. 1
  13143. 1
  13144. 1
  13145. 1
  13146. 1
  13147. 1
  13148. 1
  13149. 1
  13150. 1
  13151. 1
  13152. 1
  13153. 1
  13154. 1
  13155. 1
  13156. 1
  13157. 1
  13158. 1
  13159. 1
  13160. 1
  13161. 1
  13162. 1
  13163. 1
  13164. 1
  13165. 1
  13166. 1
  13167. 1
  13168. 1
  13169. 1
  13170. 1
  13171.  @marcomongke3116  The Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". --------------- In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical. USSR's proxy attempted to remove Chile's check-and-balance Congress system. USSR's proxy attempted to concentrate political power into a single entity (individual and political party). The US has no problems with the Swedish-style nanny market led-socialism that is practiced in the CANZUK and Nordic groups.
    1
  13172. 1
  13173. 1
  13174. 1
  13175. 1
  13176. 1
  13177. 1
  13178. 1
  13179. 1
  13180. 1
  13181. 1
  13182. 1
  13183. 1
  13184. 1
  13185. 1
  13186. 1
  13187. 1
  13188. @j6dt5bq3w Pre-U.S. Entry Into WWII From History, US Navy The first action between the U.S. and German navies occured on April 10, 1941, when USS Niblack (DD-424) neared the Icelandic coast to pick-up three boatloads of survivors from the Dutch freighter Saleier, which was sunk the previous day. When a submarine was detected preparing to attack, the division commander, Commander D.L. Ryan, ordered a depth charge attack, driving off the U-boat. USS Greer (DD-145) was attacked on September 4, 1941, by German U-boat, U-652, while she was tracking the submarine southeast of Iceland. Though the destroyer was not damaged in the attack, Greer's depth charges damaged U-652. The attack led President Franklin D. Roosevelt to issue his "shoot-on-sight" order, directing the U.S. Navy to attack any ship threatening U.S. shipping or foreign shipping under escort. U-652 would later be scuttled by U-81 after being badly damaged by depth charges from a British "Swordfish" aircraft in the Mediterrean Sea on June 2, 1942. The U.S. Navy oiler, USS Salinas (AO-19) was torpedoed off Newfoundland on September 30, 1941, by German U-boat, U-106. Without loss of life to Salinas' crew, the vessel returned to New York for repairs. In August 1943, U-106 was sunk off Spain by British and Australian Sutherland aircraft. German U-boat, U-568, torpedoed and damaged USS Kearny (DD-432) on October 17, 1941, near Iceland, resulting in 11 killed and 22 injured. In May 1942, U-568 was sunk by depth charges dropped by Royal Navy destroyer HMS Hero and destroyer escorts HMS Eridge and HMS Hurworth. On October 31, 1941, German U-boat, U-552, sank USS Reuben James (DD-245), which was escorting Convoy HX 156, with a loss of 115 lives. Reuben James was the first U.S. Navy ship lost to enemy action during World War II. During her service, U-552 sank 30 Allied vessels. She was scuttled by the Germans on May 5, 1945. While on Neutrality Patrol near the Equator, USS Omaha (CL-4) and USS Somer (DD-381) intercepted the German blockade runner Odenwald on November 4, 1941, disguised as U.S. freighter and boarded her after the German crew abandoned the ship. They brought the ship to San Juan, Puerto Rico, where the boarding party was awarded salvage shares. Of note, this award was the last prize money awarded by the U.S. Navy.
    1
  13189.  user-wj6dt5bq3w  By Herb Kugel from warfare history network The first skirmish in what became the undeclared naval war between the United States and Germany took place on April 10, 1941, when the destroyer USS Niblack, on patrol in the North Atlantic, intercepted an SOS from the Dutch freighter SS Saleier. The SOS reported the Saleier was torpedoed and sinking rapidly. The freighter’s latitude and longitude placed her 441 nautical miles from Reykjavik, Iceland. The Niblack, ordered to her assistance, sailed all night. The next morning her lookouts spotted three small lifeboats. Before attempting to pick up survivors, the Niblack circled the lifeboats while conducting a sound search for German submarines. The crew of the Saleier, nine officers and 51 men, survived, but at 8:40 am, as the last of them were taken aboard the Niblack, sound contact was made with an “undersea object.” D.L. Ryan, commander of Destroyer Division 13, with which the Niblack served, described in his report what happened next: “This contact was about two points abaft the starboard beam and if it were a submarine, it was rapidly approaching a position for attack. With safety of ship, crew, and survivors in mind, decision was made to attack instantly … Accordingly … the ship went ahead … at full speed and turned to an intercepting course. When it was estimated the ship should be over the submarine (if one were present) time depth charges were dropped at ten second intervals, and then the ship proceeded to clear the area at 28 knots on course North without further investigation.”
    1
  13190. 1
  13191. 1
  13192. 1
  13193.  user-wj6dt5bq3w  The first skirmish in what became the undeclared naval war between the United States and Germany took place on April 10, 1941, when the destroyer USS Niblack, on patrol in the North Atlantic, intercepted an SOS from the Dutch freighter SS Saleier. The SOS reported the Saleier was torpedoed and sinking rapidly. The freighter’s latitude and longitude placed her 441 nautical miles from Reykjavik, Iceland. The Niblack, ordered to her assistance, sailed all night. The next morning her lookouts spotted three small lifeboats. Before attempting to pick up survivors, the Niblack circled the lifeboats while conducting a sound search for German submarines. The crew of the Saleier, nine officers and 51 men, survived, but at 8:40 am, as the last of them were taken aboard the Niblack, sound contact was made with an “undersea object.” D.L. Ryan, commander of Destroyer Division 13, with which the Niblack served, described in his report what happened next: “This contact was about two points abaft the starboard beam and if it were a submarine, it was rapidly approaching a position for attack. With safety of ship, crew, and survivors in mind, decision was made to attack instantly … Accordingly … the ship went ahead … at full speed and turned to an intercepting course. When it was estimated the ship should be over the submarine (if one were present) time depth charges were dropped at ten second intervals, and then the ship proceeded to clear the area at 28 knots on course North without further investigation.” Your narrative is incomplete.
    1
  13194.  user-wj6dt5bq3w  The first skirmish in what became the undeclared naval war between the United States and Germany took place on April 10, 1941, when the destroyer USS Niblack, on patrol in the North Atlantic, intercepted an SOS from the Dutch freighter SS Saleier. The SOS reported the Saleier was torpedoed and sinking rapidly. The freighter’s latitude and longitude placed her 441 nautical miles from Reykjavik, Iceland. The Niblack, ordered to her assistance, sailed all night. The next morning her lookouts spotted three small lifeboats. Before attempting to pick up survivors, the Niblack circled the lifeboats while conducting a sound search for German submarines. The crew of the Saleier, nine officers and 51 men, survived, but at 8:40 am, as the last of them were taken aboard the Niblack, sound contact was made with an “undersea object.” D.L. Ryan, commander of Destroyer Division 13, with which the Niblack served, described in his report what happened next: “This contact was about two points abaft the starboard beam and if it were a submarine, it was rapidly approaching a position for attack. With safety of ship, crew, and survivors in mind, decision was made to attack instantly … Accordingly … the ship went ahead … at full speed and turned to an intercepting course. When it was estimated the ship should be over the submarine (if one were present) time depth charges were dropped at ten second intervals, and then the ship proceeded to clear the area at 28 knots on course North without further investigation.” Youtube keeps censoring my posts. Your narrative is incomplete.
    1
  13195. 1
  13196. 1
  13197. 1
  13198. 1
  13199. 1
  13200. 1
  13201. 1
  13202. 1
  13203. 1
  13204. 1
  13205. 1
  13206. 1
  13207. 1
  13208. 1
  13209. 1
  13210. 1
  13211. 1
  13212. 1
  13213. 1
  13214. 1
  13215. 1
  13216. 1
  13217. 1
  13218. 1
  13219. 1
  13220. 1
  13221. 1
  13222. 1
  13223. 1
  13224. 1
  13225. 1
  13226. 1
  13227. 1
  13228. 1
  13229. 1
  13230. 1
  13231. 1
  13232. 1
  13233. 1
  13234. 1
  13235. 1
  13236. 1
  13237. 1
  13238. 1
  13239. 1
  13240. 1
  13241. 1
  13242. 1
  13243. 1
  13244. 1
  13245. 1
  13246. 1
  13247. 1
  13248. 1
  13249. 1
  13250. 1
  13251. 1
  13252. 1
  13253. 1
  13254. 1
  13255. 1
  13256. 1
  13257. 1
  13258. 1
  13259. 1
  13260. 1
  13261. 1
  13262. 1
  13263. 1
  13264. 1
  13265. 1
  13266. 1
  13267. 1
  13268. 1
  13269. 1
  13270. 1
  13271. 1
  13272. 1
  13273. 1
  13274. 1
  13275. 1
  13276. 1
  13277. 1
  13278. 1
  13279. 1
  13280. 1
  13281. 1
  13282. 1
  13283. 1
  13284. 1
  13285. 1
  13286. 1
  13287. 1
  13288. 1
  13289. 1
  13290. 1
  13291. 1
  13292. 1
  13293. 1
  13294. 1
  13295. 1
  13296. 1
  13297. 1
  13298. 1
  13299. 1
  13300. 1
  13301. 1
  13302. 1
  13303. 1
  13304. 1
  13305. 1
  13306. 1
  13307. 1
  13308. 1
  13309. 1
  13310. 1
  13311. 1
  13312. 1
  13313. 1
  13314. 1
  13315. 1
  13316. 1
  13317. 1
  13318. 1
  13319. 1
  13320. 1
  13321. 1
  13322. 1
  13323. 1
  13324. 1
  13325.  @craigfrith7024  If you want a small population size and freedom of movement, there's NZ. Move to NZ if you want a small population size. The largest immigrant group comes from UK. The difference is British immigrants assimilate better than other ethnic groups. Pauline Hanson made a point on assimilation. Different cultures have different assimilation rates and results rediff.com/news/2008/jun/06spec.htm im.rediff.com/news/2008/jun/07look.jpg Immigrants from India and China are quick to assimilate into the economic fabric of the United States, but are not as quick when it comes to assimilating culturally and in civic matters, a study by Jacob Vigdor, associate professor of public policy studies and economics at Duke University, has found. Billed as the first annual Index of Immigrant Assimilation, the study measured three types of assimilation: economic (employment, education, homeownership); cultural (intermarriage, English proficiency, family size); and civic (citizenship rates, military service, voting). It then compared the assimilation rates of recent immigrants by country of origin, and found that immigrants from Vietnam, Cuba and the Philippines have the high ratings across the board. The overall assimilation index for all countries averages out to 28 on a scale of 100, but the index for India is under 20, and China only barely tops the 20 mark. Mexico rates 13 points, while Canada [Images] scores a high 53. "In terms of overall assimilation, immigrants from Mexico and Central America have index values below those of Indians; the index value for India is below that of China," Bridget Sweeny of the Manhattan Institute, a liberal think tank, said. Immigrants born in Canada, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Korea, the Philippines, and Vietnam have assimilation-index values higher than the national average of 28. 'This report introduces a quantitative index that measures the degree of similarity between native and foreign-born adults. It is the ability to distinguish the latter group from the former that we mean when we use the term assimilation,' the report said.
    1
  13326. 1
  13327. 1
  13328. 1
  13329. 1
  13330. 1
  13331. 1
  13332. 1
  13333. 1
  13334. 1
  13335. 1
  13336. 1
  13337. 1
  13338. 1
  13339. 1
  13340. 1
  13341. 1
  13342. 1
  13343. 1
  13344. 1
  13345. 1
  13346. 1
  13347. 1
  13348. 1
  13349. 1
  13350. 1
  13351. 1
  13352. 1
  13353. 1
  13354. 1
  13355. 1
  13356. 1
  13357. 1
  13358. 1
  13359. 1
  13360. 1
  13361. 1
  13362. 1
  13363. 1
  13364. 1
  13365. 1
  13366. 1
  13367. 1
  13368. 1
  13369. 1
  13370. 1
  13371. 1
  13372.  @cocindaucocindau354  Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country".[8] You're a fuking hypocrite.
    1
  13373. 1
  13374. 1
  13375. 1
  13376. 1
  13377. 1
  13378. 1
  13379. 1
  13380. 1
  13381. 1
  13382. 1
  13383. 1
  13384. 1
  13385. 1
  13386. 1
  13387.  @СергейШестаков-в9щ  Countries With the Largest Gold Reserves in the World. As of March 2022, these five countries have the largest gold reserves 1. United States: 8,133.5 tons. 2. Germany: 3,359.1 tons. 3. Italy: 2,451.8 tons. 4. France: 2,436.5 tons. 5. Russia: 2,301.6 tons. ----- From GPAS__2021 pdf Pension (mandated nanny state saving funds) vs GDP ratio for 2021 Five Eyes/Five Passport Group, Australia, $2,333 billion, 174.8% (CPTPP member, Nordic model), Australia's mandated large-scale savings started in the1980s under the Labor government. Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (CPTPP member, Nordic model) United Kingdom, $3,564 billion, 135.1% (near CPTPP member, Nordic model) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (I don't have data for NZ) Notice the Five Eyes group has similar pension assets to GDP ratio results Large-scale mandated savings funds enable the government to issue government bonds and large-scale bond buyer markets! EU Finland, $279 billion, 104.3% (Nordic model) France, $166 billion, 6.5% Germany, $548 billion, 14.5% Italy, $231 billion, 12.5% <----- PIIGS Netherlands, $1,900 billion, 214.4%, (Nordic model) Ireland, $197 billion, 49.4% <----- PIIGS Spain, $44 billion, 3.6% <----- PIIGS The EU lacks strategic savings coordination. Non-EU, Europe Switzerland, $1,163 billion, 164.3% (Nordic model) North America Mexico, $259 billion, 24.9% South America Brazil, $195 billion,14.3% Chile, $243 billion, 99.2% (CPTPP member) East Asia, South East Asia China, $285 billion, 1.9% Hong Kong, $199 billion, 58.3% Japan, $3,613 billion, 73.6% (CPTPP member) South Korea, $968 billion, 61.0% Malaysia, $279 billion, 83.0% (CPTPP member) South-Central Asia India, $184 billion, 7.1%
    1
  13388. 1
  13389. 1
  13390.  @vortexgaming6775  >Most countries back their currencies with gold reserves but America don't The US backed its military with gold. The US decoupled civilian and military-related economic factors. In the end, it's real firepower and logistics that win the hot war. The large-scale mandated pension savings among Five Eyes countries are about enabling the civilian side to buy large-scale government bonds to fund future potential total wars. Large-scale pension funds can invest in gold assets. From GPAS__2021 pdf Pension (mandated nanny state saving funds) vs GDP ratio for 2021 Five Eyes/Five Passport Group, Australia, $2,333 billion, 174.8% (CPTPP member, Nordic model), Australia's mandated large-scale savings started in the1980s under the Labor government. Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (CPTPP member, Nordic model) United Kingdom, $3,564 billion, 135.1% (near CPTPP member, Nordic model) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (I don't have data for NZ) Notice the Five Eyes group has similar pension assets to GDP ratio results Large-scale mandated savings funds enable the government to issue government bonds and large-scale bond buyer markets! Five Eyes for improved situation awareness and mandated pension savings are lessons from WW2. EU Finland, $279 billion, 104.3% (Nordic model) France, $166 billion, 6.5% Germany, $548 billion, 14.5% Italy, $231 billion, 12.5% <----- PIIGS Netherlands, $1,900 billion, 214.4%, (Nordic model) Ireland, $197 billion, 49.4% <----- PIIGS Spain, $44 billion, 3.6% <----- PIIGS The EU lacks strategic savings coordination. Non-EU, Europe Switzerland, $1,163 billion, 164.3% (Nordic model) North America Mexico, $259 billion, 24.9% South America Brazil, $195 billion,14.3% Chile, $243 billion, 99.2% (CPTPP member) East Asia, South East Asia China, $285 billion, 1.9% Hong Kong, $199 billion, 58.3% Japan, $3,613 billion, 73.6% (CPTPP member) South Korea, $968 billion, 61.0% Malaysia, $279 billion, 83.0% (CPTPP member) South-Central Asia India, $184 billion, 7.1%
    1
  13391. 1
  13392. 1
  13393. 1
  13394. 1
  13395. 1
  13396. 1
  13397. 1
  13398.  @supernatural_forces  >You have to read/ study if you want to go in depth. When the paper would be Devaluated to near 100% then Paper's value would turn to zero and system will collapse. It is propagated to us as Hyperinflation Learn the reasons for the Euro was created with a large 342 million population base Eurozone change demand factor for effectively renamed Deutsche Mark. As one of many major factors, the currency's worth is related to its usage demand. Learn from Sri Lanka when they run out of foreign currencies. Sri Lanka is a small nation, hence its currency means little to other countries. US Federal Reserve (USD) is also engaged in an official monetary union with several countries e.g. El Salvador and Ecuador, hence creating +354 million population USD zone. US immigration is part of increasing its currency's market base as an alternative to the imperialist annexing another country method. The UK lost its currency strength when the Sterling zone disintegrated via Commonwealth's Imperial Preference (custom union) was dismantled as a price for US supporting UK's WW2 adventures. Major Commonwealth members such as Australia and Canada switched from Sterling to Dollar based decimal currency after WW2. USSR's disintegration wasn't the 1st European empire to collapse. >Regarding polygamy, its actually better for women and the society. Preaching virtue while demanding repentance while supporting polygamy shows their own hypocrisy. Polygamy promotes selfish actions from a few men. I don't support the monopolistic behavior of some men who argues for polygamy. >Porn has a very devastating effect on men's psychology and their behavior towards women. Women's bodies don't change from porn to having a polygamy relationship i.e. many women as wives. Don't blame women for men's behavioral issues.
    1
  13399. 1
  13400. 1
  13401. 1
  13402. 1
  13403. 1
  13404. 1
  13405. 1
  13406. 1
  13407. 1
  13408. 1
  13409. 1
  13410. 1
  13411. 1
  13412. 1
  13413. 1
  13414. 1
  13415. 1
  13416. 1
  13417. 1
  13418. 1
  13419. 1
  13420. 1
  13421. 1
  13422. 1
  13423. 1
  13424. 1
  13425. 1
  13426. 1
  13427. 1
  13428. 1
  13429. 1
  13430. 1
  13431. 1
  13432. 1
  13433. 1
  13434. 1
  13435. 1
  13436. 1
  13437. 1
  13438. 1
  13439. 1
  13440. 1
  13441. 1
  13442. 1
  13443. 1
  13444. 1
  13445. 1
  13446. 1
  13447. 1
  13448. 1
  13449. 1
  13450. 1
  13451. 1
  13452. 1
  13453. 1
  13454. 1
  13455. 1
  13456. 1
  13457. 1
  13458. 1
  13459. 1
  13460. 1
  13461. 1
  13462. 1
  13463. 1
  13464. 1
  13465. 1
  13466. 1
  13467. 1
  13468. 1
  13469. 1
  13470. 1
  13471. 1
  13472. 1
  13473. 1
  13474. 1
  13475. 1
  13476. 1
  13477. 1
  13478. 1
  13479. 1
  13480. 1
  13481. 1
  13482. 1
  13483. 1
  13484. 1
  13485. 1
  13486. 1
  13487. 1
  13488. 1
  13489. 1
  13490. 1
  13491. 1
  13492. 1
  13493. 1
  13494. 1
  13495. 1
  13496. 1
  13497. 1
  13498. 1
  13499. 1
  13500. 1
  13501. 1
  13502. 1
  13503. 1
  13504. 1
  13505. 1
  13506. 1
  13507. 1
  13508. 1
  13509. 1
  13510. 1
  13511. 1
  13512. 1
  13513. 1
  13514. 1
  13515. 1
  13516. 1
  13517. 1
  13518. 1
  13519. 1
  13520. 1
  13521. 1
  13522. 1
  13523. 1
  13524. 1
  13525. 1
  13526. 1
  13527. 1
  13528. 1
  13529. 1
  13530. 1
  13531. 1
  13532. 1
  13533. 1
  13534. 1
  13535. 1
  13536. 1
  13537. 1
  13538. 1
  13539. 1
  13540. 1
  13541. 1
  13542. 1
  13543. 1
  13544. 1
  13545. 1
  13546. 1
  13547. 1
  13548. 1
  13549. 1
  13550. 1
  13551. 1
  13552. 1
  13553. 1
  13554. 1
  13555. 1
  13556. 1
  13557. 1
  13558. 1
  13559. 1
  13560. 1
  13561. 1
  13562. 1
  13563. 1
  13564. 1
  13565. 1
  13566. 1
  13567. 1
  13568. 1
  13569. 1
  13570. 1
  13571. 1
  13572. 1
  13573. 1
  13574. 1
  13575. 1
  13576. 1
  13577. 1
  13578. 1
  13579. 1
  13580. 1
  13581. 1
  13582. 1
  13583. 1
  13584. 1
  13585. 1
  13586. 1
  13587. 1
  13588. 1
  13589. 1
  13590. 1
  13591. 1
  13592. 1
  13593. 1
  13594. 1
  13595. 1
  13596. 1
  13597. 1
  13598. 1
  13599. 1
  13600. 1
  13601. 1
  13602. 1
  13603. 1
  13604. 1
  13605. 1
  13606. 1
  13607. 1
  13608. 1
  13609. 1
  13610. 1
  13611. 1
  13612. 1
  13613. 1
  13614. 1
  13615. 1
  13616. 1
  13617. 1
  13618. 1
  13619. 1
  13620. 1
  13621. 1
  13622. 1
  13623. 1
  13624. 1
  13625. 1
  13626. 1
  13627. 1
  13628. 1
  13629. 1
  13630. 1
  13631. 1
  13632. 1
  13633. 1
  13634. 1
  13635. 1
  13636. 1
  13637. 1
  13638. 1
  13639. 1
  13640. 1
  13641. 1
  13642. 1
  13643. 1
  13644. 1
  13645. 1
  13646. 1
  13647. 1
  13648. 1
  13649. 1
  13650. 1
  13651. 1
  13652. 1
  13653. 1
  13654. 1
  13655. 1
  13656. 1
  13657. 1
  13658. 1
  13659. 1
  13660. 1
  13661. 1
  13662. 1
  13663. 1
  13664. 1
  13665. 1
  13666. 1
  13667. 1
  13668. 1
  13669. 1
  13670. 1
  13671. 1
  13672. 1
  13673. 1
  13674. 1
  13675. 1
  13676. 1
  13677. 1
  13678. 1
  13679. 1
  13680. 1
  13681. 1
  13682. 1
  13683. 1
  13684. 1
  13685. 1
  13686. 1
  13687. 1
  13688. 1
  13689. 1
  13690. 1
  13691. 1
  13692. 1
  13693. 1
  13694. 1
  13695. 1
  13696. 1
  13697. 1
  13698. 1
  13699. 1
  13700. 1
  13701. 1
  13702. 1
  13703. Employees of Greenland Australia, a subsidiary of the Chinese government-backed global property giant Greenland Group, were instructed to put their normal work on hold and source bulk supplies of essential medical items to ship back to China. CCP sleepers directly interfered with AU medical supplies during 1st wave COVID-19 outbreak. --- CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  13704. 1
  13705. 1
  13706. 1
  13707. 1
  13708. 1
  13709. 1
  13710. 1
  13711. 1
  13712. 1
  13713. 1
  13714. 1
  13715. 1
  13716. 1
  13717. 1
  13718. 1
  13719. 1
  13720. 1
  13721. 1
  13722. 1
  13723. 1
  13724. 1
  13725. 1
  13726. 1
  13727. 1
  13728. 1
  13729. 1
  13730. 1
  13731. 1
  13732. 1
  13733. 1
  13734. 1
  13735. 1
  13736. 1
  13737. 1
  13738. 1
  13739. 1
  13740. 1
  13741. 1
  13742. 1
  13743. 1
  13744. 1
  13745. 1
  13746. 1
  13747. 1
  13748. 1
  13749. 1
  13750. 1
  13751. 1
  13752. 1
  13753. 1
  13754. 1
  13755. 1
  13756. 1
  13757. 1
  13758. 1
  13759. 1
  13760. 1
  13761. 1
  13762. 1
  13763.  @bobbuliniusbotulismus7129  Note that China has a "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" which is known as CCP's protectionist list. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China's anti-foreign Market Access Negative List resulted in Australia's reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  13764. 1
  13765. 1
  13766. 1
  13767. 1
  13768. 1
  13769. 1
  13770. 1
  13771. 1
  13772. 1
  13773. 1
  13774. 1
  13775. 1
  13776. 1
  13777. 1
  13778. 1
  13779. 1
  13780. 1
  13781. 1
  13782. 1
  13783. 1
  13784. 1
  13785. 1
  13786. 1
  13787. 1
  13788. 1
  13789. 1
  13790.  @thomasoloughlin9075  From funding-tracker-who-s-sending-aid-to-ukraine-102887 European Union The European Union announced two major packages of €330 million ($353 million) and €500 million ($535 million) in humanitarian funding early in the war. It also co-hosted a pledging summit for Ukraine with the international movement Global Citizen and the Canadian government, at which the EU pledged €600 million to support Ukraine itself, and another €400 million to support other countries that have taken on Ukrainian refugees. In addition to humanitarian grant funding, the EU has provided several packages of loans and other finance, both directly and through the European Investment Bank. Meanwhile, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, which is partially owned by EIB and by the EU and its member countries, has made €2 billion in loan finance available. United States The U.S. government has announced several packages of emergency funding for Ukraine, with the latest worth $40 billion, split relatively evenly between military support and humanitarian aid, according to The New York Times. Many details of the spending are still to be fleshed out, and updates will be recorded on Devex’s Funding Platform when more is known about how the humanitarian funding will be channeled. The Devex Funding Platform also includes other announcements from the U.S. government, including a $1 billion commitment from earlier this year. United Kingdom The U.K. has committed a total of £1.5 billion ($1.7 billion) in humanitarian and economic support for Ukraine, according to a government website. It has sent another £2.3 billion of military aid. Germany Germany’s leaders have faced criticism for not supplying enough arms to Ukraine and for taking a more cautious approach to the possible defeat of Russia. However, Germany has been relatively generous in supplying aid, with a recent €1 billion grant. ------ EU's funding for Ukraine is small when compared to the UK and US. Keep it in context.
    1
  13791. 1
  13792. 1
  13793. 1
  13794. 1
  13795. 1
  13796. 1
  13797. 1
  13798. 1
  13799. 1
  13800. 1
  13801. 1
  13802. 1
  13803. 1
  13804. 1
  13805. 1
  13806. 1
  13807. 1
  13808. 1
  13809. 1
  13810. 1
  13811. 1
  13812. 1
  13813. Jose Rebatta, BULLSHIT. https://www.dw.com/en/donald-trump-isnt-the-only-solar-power-protectionist/a-42322107 Donald Trump isn't the only solar power protectionist The United States, the European Union and India are all slapping tariffs on Chinese solar panels, accusing Beijing of dumping From March 2017, China has higher trade tariffs on US built cars before Trump's response. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/20/business/economy/china-us-trade-tariffs.html For example, an American car going to China pays 25% import duty, but a Chinese car coming to the US only pays 2.5%, a tenfold difference — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 8, 2018 From Musk's March 8th, 2018, China already has 25 percent import duty on US made cars before Trump's response. https://global.handelsblatt.com/politics/trump-may-point-eu-tariffs-ifo-says-899083 “The EU is by no means the paradise for free traders that it likes to think,” said Gabriel Felbermayr, director of the ifo Center for International Economics, a division of the Munich-based ifo Institute. The European Union actually comes off as the bigger offender when compared to the US, he added. The unweighted average EU customs duty is 5.2 percent, versus the US rate of 3.5 percent, according to ifo’s database. So when Mr. Trump complains of “massive tariffs” he is not that far off the mark in several cases. And he does complain. “If the EU wants to further increase their already massive tariffs and barriers on US companies doing business there, we will simply apply a tax on their cars, which freely pour into the US,” the president tweeted earlier this month. “They make it impossible for our cars (and more) to sell there. Big trade imbalance!” In fact it wasn’t even Mr. Trump who first broke off negotiations over a US-EU free trade deal known as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), the German economist noted. It was actually the EU that put the unpopular talks “on ice” ahead of elections in France and Germany. https://www.ft.com/content/25900f14-1564-11e8-9c33-02f893d608c2 India has increased it's tariff on Chinese products since Feb 2018. http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/countries/china/ When China joined the WTO in 2001 it agreed to reform and liberalise important parts of its economy. While China has made progress, some problems remain: a lack of transparency industrial policies and non-tariff measures that discriminate against foreign companies strong government intervention in the economy, resulting in a dominant position of state-owned firms, unequal access to subsidies and cheap financing poor protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights In 2016 the EU adopted a new strategy on China mapping out the European Union's relationship with China for the next five years.* The Strategy promotes reciprocity* , a level playing field and fair competition across all areas of co-operation. The strategy also includes a trade agenda with a strong focus on improving market access opportunities – including negotiations on a Comprehensive Agreement on Investment. It also deals with overcapacity and calling on China to engage with ambition at multilateral level. https://www.export.gov/article?id=Argentina-trade-barriers Tariff Barriers For countries outside the MERCOSUR area, Argentina and its MERCOSUR partners established the MERCOSUR common external tariff (CET) on January 1, 1995. The CET currently ranges from zero to 20 percent for most products. However, some products in the automotive sector can reach 35 percent. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-steel-china/eu-raises-import-duties-on-chinese-steel-angering-beijing-idUSKBN1780VU EU already raises import duties on Chinese steel in 2017. https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-06/europe-renews-tariffs-chinese-steel-pipes-high-72 European Union Renews Tariffs On Chinese Steel Pipes As High As 72% You're a hypocrite to single out Trump when other countries engages in their own "Made In XYZ country" programs
    1
  13814. 1
  13815. 1
  13816. 1
  13817. 1
  13818. 1
  13819. Putin: “Speaking of security guarantees … our actions will not depend upon the negotiations, they will depend on the unconditional compliance with Russian security demands”. The main articles of Russian draft proposed agreement demand included eight articles with the following points: Article 1: the parties should not strengthen their security at the expense of Russia’s security; Article 2: the parties will use multilateral consultations and the NATO-Russia Council to address points of conflict; Article 3: the parties reaffirm that they do not consider each other as adversaries and maintain a dialogue; Article 4: the parties shall not deploy military forces and weaponry on the territory of any of the other states in Europe in addition to any forces that were deployed as of May 27, 1997; Article 5: the parties shall not deploy land-based intermediate- and short-range missiles adjacent to the other parties; Article 6: all member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization commit themselves to refrain from any further enlargement of NATO, including the accession of Ukraine as well as other States; Article 7: the parties that are member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization shall not conduct any military activity on the territory of Ukraine as well as other States in the Eastern Europe, in the South Caucasus and in Central Asia; and Article 8: the agreement shall not be interpreted as affecting the primary responsibility of the Security Council of the United Nations for maintaining international peace and security. ---------------- For Article 1, Israel sells missile technology to Eastern Europe while Russia sells missile technology to Israel's adversaries. For Article 3, Being labeled adversaries are based on action and behaviors. Finland, Poland, and the Baltic states have purchased Israeli missile technology and have historical issues with Imperialist Russia. For Article 4, Russia's demand to degrade NATO's Article V enforcement. For Article 5, Israel sells missile technology to Eastern Europe while Russia sells missile technology to Israel's adversaries. For Article 6, Russia demands to restrict counties in Eastern Europe's freedom of association. For Article 7, Russia's demand to degrade NATO's Article V enforcement for NATO members in Eastern Europe. For Article 8, Putin's bullshit statement.
    1
  13820. 1
  13821. 1
  13822. 1
  13823. 1
  13824. 1
  13825. 1
  13826. 1
  13827. 1
  13828. 1
  13829.  @briananderson7285  https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/2012-10/Lima%20Declaration%20and%20Plan%20of%20Action%20on%20Industrial%20Development%20and%20Co-operation_26.3.1975_0.PDF Quote from LIMA 27. That countries, particularly developed countries, should undertake an objective and critical examination of their present policies and make appropriate changes in such policies so as to facilitate the expansion and diversification of imports from developing countries and thereby make possible international economic relations on a rational, just and equitable basis; 28. That, in view of the low percentage share of the developing countries in total world industrial production, recalling General Assembly resolution 3306 (XX IX), of 14 December 1974, and taking into account the policy guidelines and qualitative recommendations made in the present Declaration. their share should be increased to the maximum possible extent and as far as possible to at least 25 per cent of total world industrial production by the year 2000, while making every endeavour to ensure that the industrial growth so achieved is distributed among the developing countries as evenly as possible. This implies that the developing countries should increase their industrial growth at a rate considerably higher than the 8 per cent recommended in the International Development Strategy for the Second United Nations Development Decade ------------------------ LIMA "increased to the maximum possible extent and as far as possible to at least 25 per cent of total world industrial production by the year 2000" statement was designed to disarm resistance against LIMA's goals.
    1
  13830. 1
  13831. 1
  13832. 1
  13833. 1
  13834. 1
  13835. 1
  13836. 1
  13837. 1
  13838. 1
  13839. 1
  13840. 1
  13841. 1
  13842. 1
  13843. 1
  13844. 1
  13845. Yugoslavia. Read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breakup_of_Yugoslavia Miloševic refused to agree to the plan, as he claimed that the European Community had no right to dissolve Yugoslavia and that the plan was not in the interests of Serbs as it would divide the Serb people into four republics (Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia & Herzegovina, and Croatia). Carington responded by putting the issue to a vote in which all the other republics, including Montenegro under Momir Bulatovic, initially agreed to the plan that would dissolve Yugoslavia. However, after intense pressure from Serbia on Montenegro's President, Montenegro changed its position to oppose the dissolution of Yugoslavia. Europeans fundamentally continued WW2 type push on Serbs. This time around, Germany has the power of NATO which includes the largest member in Germanic language family of countries (Ref 1) i.e. USA + other Anglosphere countries (UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand). Ref 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germanic_languages Read http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1992-01-16/news/9201050384_1_croatia-cease-fire-european-nations "*The European move, and follow-up actions elsewhere, are expected to put pressure on the United States to grant recognition*, even though it has been opposed to such a step at this time. The U.S. fears that recognition could endanger the current cease-fire in the war between Serbia and Croatia and cause the war to spread to Bosnia-Herzegovina." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_Yugoslav_breakup 19 December 1991: Germany announces that it will recognize Croatia on January 15, 1992, with or without the rest of the European Community. 23 December 1991: Germany becomes the first major power to recognize Croatia and Slovenia as independent states 15 January 1992: The European Community recognizes Slovenia and Croatia. Without NATO(and U.S.),Germany and Austria would have done it alone and we would have another WW1 i.e. Russia would have taken on Germany and Austria as in WWI. Attacks on Poland would have brought in UK which brings US. NATO and USA kept Russia in check. Your blame on the US is flawed when it's the European move that pushed for Yugoslavia's break-up
    1
  13846. 1
  13847. 1
  13848. 1
  13849. 1
  13850. 1
  13851. 1
  13852. 1
  13853. 1
  13854. 1
  13855. 1
  13856. 1
  13857. 1
  13858. 1
  13859. 1
  13860. 1
  13861. 1
  13862. 1
  13863. 1
  13864. 1
  13865. 1
  13866. 1
  13867. 1
  13868. 1
  13869. 1
  13870. 1
  13871. 1
  13872. 1
  13873.  @nobodyshome6792  Title: Memorandum on security assurances in connection with Ukraine’s accession to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Registration Number: 52241 1. The United States of America, the Russian Federation, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, reaffirm their commitment to Ukraine, in accordance with the principles of the CSCE [Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe] Final Act, to respect the Independence and Sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine. 2. The United States of America, the Russian Federation, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, reaffirm their obligation to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, and that none of their weapons will ever be used against Ukraine except in self-defense or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations. 3. The United States of America, the Russian Federation, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, reaffirm their commitment to Ukraine, in accordance with the principles of the CSCE Final Act, to refrain from economic coercion designed to subordinate to their own interest the exercise by Ukraine of the rights inherent in its sovereignty and thus to secure advantages of any kind. 4. The United States of America, the Russian Federation, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, reaffirm their commitment to seek immediate United Nations Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine, as a non-nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, if Ukraine should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used. 5. The United States of America, the Russian Federation, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, reaffirm, in the case of the Ukraine, their commitment not to use nuclear weapons against any non-nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, except in the case of an attack on themselves, their territories or dependent territories, their armed forces, or their allies, by such a state in association or alliance with a nuclear weapon state. 6. The United States of America, the Russian Federation, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland will consult in the event a situation arises which raises a question concerning these commitments. ------------------ Ukraine is using clause 1 i.e. reaffirming their (US, UK, Russia) commitment to Ukraine's independence and sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine.
    1
  13874. 1
  13875. 1
  13876. 1
  13877. 1
  13878. 1
  13879. 1
  13880. 1
  13881. 1
  13882. 1
  13883. 1
  13884. 1
  13885. 1
  13886. 1
  13887. The Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". --------------- In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical. USSR's proxy attempted to remove Chile's check-and-balance Congress system. USSR's proxy attempted to concentrate political power into a single entity (individual and political party).
    1
  13888. 1
  13889. 1
  13890. 1
  13891. 1
  13892. 1
  13893. 1
  13894. 1
  13895. 1
  13896. 1
  13897. 1
  13898. 1
  13899. 1
  13900. 1
  13901. 1
  13902. 1
  13903. 1
  13904. 1
  13905. 1
  13906. 1
  13907. 1
  13908. 1
  13909. 1
  13910. 1
  13911. 1
  13912. 1
  13913. 1
  13914. 1
  13915. 1
  13916. 1
  13917. 1
  13918. 1
  13919. 1
  13920. 1
  13921. 1
  13922. 1
  13923. 1
  13924. 1
  13925.  @kaneidareyue7715  Formosa is not China's Hawaii. Chiang Kai-Shek Supplementing The Act Of Surrender 1945 excluded Manchuria, Formosa, and French Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude. Order Of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-Shek Supplementing The Act Of Surrender 1945 This is order No. 1 of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek to the Japanese forces in China, excluding Manchuria, Formosa, and French Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude, which were surrendered under the act of 9 September 1945. This order supplements the acts of surrender to the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers and his General Order No. 1. September 9, 1945 Order of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek supplementing the Act of Surrender 9 September 1945 Immediately following the signing of the Act of Surrender ending the war in the China Theatre, General Ho Ying-chen handed Order No. 1 of Generalissimo Chiang to Lieut. Gen. Okamura Yasutsugu as a supplement to the Act of Surrender. I. This is order No. 1 of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek to the Japanese forces in China, excluding Manchuria, Formosa, and French Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude, which were surrendered under the act of 9 September 1945. This order supplements the acts of surrender to the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers and his General Order No. 1. II. The Japanese Commanders surrendering the Japanese forces in the areas named above will issue the following order to and insure compliance of such order by all forces under their command. 1. The Emperor of Japan, the Japanese government and the Japanese Imperial General Headquarters have recognized complete military defeat of the Japanese military forces by the Allied forces and have surrendered unconditionally all Japanese forces to the Allied Powers. 2. All the Japanese ground, sea, air, and auxiliary forces within China, excluding Manchuria, Formosa and Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude, have been surrendered unconditionally to Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek and henceforth all such surrendered Japanese forces will be subject to the control of the Generalissimo. Their movements and activities will be dictated by him, and they will obey only orders or proclamations issued or authorized by him, or orders of their Japanese commanders based upon his instructions. 3. The surrendered Japanese forces are now non-combatant troops and all hostilities will cease. All such Japanese forces will remain at the stations they now occupy and await further orders from the Generalissimo. They will assemble, preserve without damage, and turn over to forces specified by the Generalissimo all arms, ammunition, equipment, supplies, records, information and assets of any kind belonging to the Japanese forces and auxiliaries. 4. All Japanese aircraft, naval units and merchant ships in the areas named above will be held without damage where they are at present located, except those stated in the Generalissimo’s proclamation No. 1. Boats on the Yangtze will be assembled at Ichang. Explosives aboard vessels will be removed immediately to safe storage ashore. 5. Commanders of the Japanese military units and civilian auxiliaries will maintain discipline and order and will be responsible for the behaviour of their troops. They will see that their forces do not harm or molest inhabitants, or pillage, loot, or bring unauthorized damage to their property. 6. With respect to the United Nations prisoners of war and civilian internees in the hands of the Japanese or Japanese controlled authorities: 1. The safety and well being of all United Nations prisoners of war and civilian internees will be scrupulously preserved, to include the administrative and supply services essential to provide adequate food, shelter, clothing, and medical care until such responsibility is undertaken by the Generalissimo or his authorized representatives. 2. Each camp or other place of detention of United Nations prisoners of war and civilian internees together with its equipment, stores, records, arms, and ammunition will be delivered immediately to the command of the senior officer or designated representative of the prisoners of war and civilian internees. 3. As directed by the Generalissimo, or his duly authorized representatives, prisoners of war and civilian internees will be transported to places of safety where they can be accepted by Allied authorities. 4. The Supreme Headquarters in China, Formosa and Indochina of each of the Japanese military forces and auxiliaries which have surrendered to the Generalissimo will furnish him within time limit of this order, complete lists' of all United Nations prisoners of war and civilian internees indicating their location. 7. Pending further orders the Japanese forces surrendered to the Generalissimo will continue to operate their lines of services and supply essential to provide food, clothing, medical and other subsistence supplies to feed and supply their own forces and persons for whom they are responsible. 8. Responsible Japanese or Japanese controlled military and civil authorities will insure that: 1. All Japanese mines and minefields and other obstacles to movement by land, sea, and air, wherever located will be removed according to instructions of the Generalissimo or his representatives. 2. All safety lanes are to be kept open and clearly marked pending accomplishment of the above. 3. All land, water, and air transportation and communications facilities and equipment are to be held intact and maintained in good condition. 4. All military installations and establishment including airfields, seaplane bases, aircraft defences, ports and naval bases, storage depots, permanent and temporary land-end coastal fortifications, fortresses, and other fortifications, installations and establishments, all factories, plants, ships, research institutions, laboratories, testing storage depots, permanent and plans, drawings and inventions designed or intended to produce or to facilitate the production on and of all implements of war and other material and property used by or intended for use by military or semi-military organizations in connection with its operations are to be held intact and maintained in good condition. III. The Supreme Headquarters in China, Formosa, and French Indo-China of the forces which have been surrendered to the Generalissimo within the time limit of the receipt of this order will furnish complete information for their respective areas concerning the following: 1. Lists of all land, air, and anti-aircraft units showing locations and strengths in officers and men. 2. Lists of all aircraft military, naval, and civil, giving complete information as to the number, type, location, and condition of such aircraft. 3. Lists of all Japanese and Japanese controllerd naval vessels, surface and submarines and auxiliary naval craft in or out of commission and under construction, giving their position and condition. 4. List of, and position and condition of, all Japanese and Japanese controlled merchant ships of over 100 gross tonnes in or out of commission and under construction, including merchant ships formerly belonging to any of the United Nations which are now in the Japanese hands. 5. Complete and detailed information accompanied by maps, showing locations and layouts of all the mines, minefields, and other obstacles to movement by land, sea, or air, and the safety lanes in connection therewith. 6. Locations and descriptions of all military installations and establishments, including airfields, seaplane bases, anti-aircraft defenses, ports and naval bases, storage depots, permanent and temporary land and coast fortifications, fortresses and other fortified areas. 7. Location of all camps and other places of detention of United Nations prisoners of war and civilian internees required under paragraph II F above. IV. The Supreme Headquarters in China, Formosa, and Indo-China of the forces surrendered to the Generalissimo shall be prepared, on instructions from the occupation commanders representing the Generalissimo to furnish the names and addresses of Japanese civilians residing in their respective areas and to collect and deliver all arms in the possession of such Japanese civilian population. The Headquarters named above will immediately notify all Japanese civilians that until further notice from appropriate authorities representing the Generalissimo they will remain in the vicinity of their present residence and will keep the local Japanese commander advised of their whereabouts. CHIANG KAI-SHEK
    1
  13926.  @kaneidareyue7715  >Taiwan though is a Chinese city that was taken by a losing side in a political civil war When KMT lost the civil war, Taiwan was an American occupation of Japanese Taiwan islands. The US tolerated the KMT government in exile in Taiwan. There are opposing views on the legality of the KMT takeover of Taiwan. The Chinese Communist government maintains to this day that the Republic of China in Taiwan is a province that must eventually return to rule by the mainland. According to an article published in 1955 on the legal status of Taiwan, "It has been charged that Chiang Kai-shek has no claim to the island because he is 'merely a fugitive quartering his army' there and besides, his is a government in exile." Moreover, the Treaty of San Francisco, which was officially signed by 48 nations on 8 September 1951, did not specify to whom Japan was ceding Taiwan and the Pescadores. Despite this, the ROC was viewed by the vast majority of states at the time as the legitimate representative of China, as it had succeeded the Qing Dynasty, while the PRC was at the time a mostly unrecognized state. Japan was, at the time of the signing of the Treaty of San Francisco, still technically under American occupation. After full independence, Japan established full relations with the ROC and not the PRC. According to Professor Gene Hsiao, "since the San Francisco Peace Treaty and the separate KMT treaty with Japan did not specify to whom Japan was ceding Taiwan and the Pescadores, the implication of the U.S. position was that legally, and insofar as the signatories of those two treaties were concerned, Taiwan became an 'ownerless' island and the KMT, by its own assent to the American policy, a foreign government-in-exile." Technically, KMT is a foreign government in exile under the American occupation of Japanese Taiwan islands. President Xi's claims over Taiwan follow Imperial China's imperialist Ten Great Campaigns. Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns' Taiwan conquest phase wasn't completed on the eve of the 1894 Sino-Japanese War.
    1
  13927. 1
  13928. 1
  13929. 1
  13930. 1
  13931. 1
  13932. 1
  13933. 1
  13934. 1
  13935. 1
  13936. 1
  13937. 1
  13938. 1
  13939. 1
  13940.  @nerdydeep5955  >Killing afghanis,irak,Iran, striya? >Libya NATO STOPPED the bloody civil war in Libya. Putin STARTED the bloody war in Ukraine. On 16 August 2003, Libya formally admitted responsibility for Pan Am Flight 103 (Lockabie bombing) in a letter presented to the president of the United Nations Security Council. "On 10 March 2011, France was the first country in the world to recognise the National Transitional Council as the legitimate government of Libya". United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 was adopted by the United Nations Security Council on 17 March 2011 in response to the First Libyan Civil War. The Security Council resolution was proposed by France, Lebanon, and the United Kingdom. Muammar Gaddafi played stupid games and win stupid prizes. >Iraq Iraq invaded Kuwait. Iraq STARTED the bloody war in Kuwait. Iraq's top oil exports countries from Jan to Jun 2020 1st, China! 29 million tonnes <---- LOL 2nd, India, 23 million tonnes 3rd, EU, 8 million tonnes 4th, South Korea, 6 million tonnes 5th, Turkey, 4 million tonnes with an upwards trend 5th, USA, 4 million tonnes with a downwards trend Report: Saudi Arabia Presses U.S. on Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Date: January 19, 1992 From AP NEWS NEW YORK (AP) _ Saudi Arabia is pressuring the Bush administration to secretly arm and give intelligence to Iraqi opposition forces so they can work to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a newspaper reported Sunday. The Saudis want the United States to give arms and intelligence to Kurdish rebels in north Iraq, Shiite Muslim fighters in the south and Sunni Muslim opposition forces in central Iraq, the Times said, quoting U.S. and allied officials it didn’t name.
    1
  13941. 1
  13942. 1
  13943. 1
  13944. 1
  13945. 1
  13946. 1
  13947. 1
  13948. 1
  13949. 1
  13950. 1
  13951. 1
  13952. 1
  13953. 1
  13954. 1
  13955. 1
  13956. 1
  13957.  @chriswilson3009  From ANKARA Poland is ready to fully cease Russian gas supplies as it has alternative energy sources, an energy analyst from the Jagiellonian Institute in Poland, Wojciech Jakobik, said Thursday. Jakobik, who is also the editor of Biznesalert, a prized source on key energy and infrastructure issues in Poland told Anadolu Agency that Bulgaria can also do without Russian gas with EU support as echoed by the European Commission. "This is something the European Commission has been preparing for, in close coordination and solidarity with Member States and international partners," European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said on Wednesday. "This shows first of all the immense solidarity among us but it also shows the effectiveness of past investments, for example in interconnectors and other gas infrastructure. The Commission will also intensify its work with the so-called regional groups of Member States, that can provide the most immediate solidarity to each other. This will mitigate any impacts on possible gas disruptions," he noted. He further confirmed that work would continue to ensure sufficient gas supply and storage in the medium term. "Our action plan REPowerEU will help to significantly reduce our dependency on Russian fossil fuels already this year," he said. Jakobik explained that Poland is capable of replacing half of its import needs from Russia through other sources. "Poland uses 20 billion cubic meters per year and had imported up to 10 billion cubic meters. It is capable of importing all its needs through LNG terminals and from its neighbors. Soon it will be ready to import more through the Baltic Pipe from Norway and LNG from Lithuania," he noted. Nonetheless, Jakobik envisages that there could be gas usage limitations in Europe in the autumn to guarantee security of supply. He recommended that the EU continue to work to secure supplies in the likelihood of a total gas cut-off from Russia.
    1
  13958. 1
  13959. 1
  13960. 1
  13961. 1
  13962. 1
  13963. 1
  13964. 1
  13965. 1
  13966. 1
  13967. 1
  13968. 1
  13969. 1
  13970. 1
  13971. 1
  13972. 1
  13973. 1
  13974. 1
  13975. 1
  13976. 1
  13977. 1
  13978. 1
  13979. 1
  13980. 1
  13981. 1
  13982. 1
  13983. 1
  13984. 1
  13985. 1
  13986. 1
  13987. 1
  13988. 1
  13989. 1
  13990. 1
  13991. 1
  13992. 1
  13993. 1
  13994. 1
  13995. 1
  13996. 1
  13997. 1
  13998. 1
  13999. 1
  14000. 1
  14001. 1
  14002. 1
  14003. 1
  14004. 1
  14005. 1
  14006. 1
  14007. 1
  14008. 1
  14009. 1
  14010. 1
  14011. 1
  14012. 1
  14013. 1
  14014. 1
  14015. 1
  14016. 1
  14017. 1
  14018. 1
  14019. 1
  14020. 1
  14021. 1
  14022. 1
  14023. 1
  14024. 1
  14025. 1
  14026. 1
  14027.  @yankrasnou8289  > It is true that Ukraine wants American aid and that will result getting nuclear weapons being placed so close to the Russian border FALSE narrative. If the US and UK abandon Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum, it will nullify the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons being applied to Ukraine. Ukraine's current government already declared they will restore their nuclear weapons if the west doesn't fulfill Budapest Memorandum's security assurances. Australia has sold uranium to Ukraine. For Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum context, Russia, the US and the UK confirmed their Ukraine becoming parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and effectively abandoning their nuclear arsenal to Russia and that they would: 1. Respect Ukrainian independence and sovereignty in the existing borders. 2. Refrain from the threat or the use of force against Ukraine. 3. Refrain from using economic pressure on Ukraine to influence their politics. 4. Seek immediate Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine if they "should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used". 5. Refrain from the use of nuclear arms against Ukraine. 6. Consult with one another if questions arise regarding those commitments. China and France gave somewhat weaker individual assurances in separate documents. US/UK is fulfilling points 4 and 6 in accordance with Ukraine's Budapest Memorandum. Budapest Memorandum's security assurances are weaker than NATO Article V. Are you arguing for the US to abandon the Budapest Memorandum?
    1
  14028. 1
  14029. 1
  14030. 1
  14031.  @MrVitalirapalis  19 December 1991: Germany announces that it will recognize Croatia on January 15, 1992, with or without the rest of the European Community. 23 December 1991: Germany becomes the first major power to recognize Croatia and Slovenia as independent states 15 January 1992: The European Community recognizes Slovenia and Croatia. Without NATO(and U.S.), Germany would have done it alone and we would have another WW1 trigger i.e. Russia would have taken on Germany as in WWI. Germany used NATO with North America's raw material security guarantees to further its own interest when it failed in WW1's goals. Decoupling North America's raw material security guarantees from mainland Europe will enable Russia to win any war of attrition against Germany! Germany is not stupid. Land Area for potential raw materials with the war of attrition context Canada = 9.985 million km² United States = 9.834 million km² Subtotal: 19.819 million km² Australia = 7.692 million km², signed defense agreement Japan (377,975 km²). Europe = 4.233 million km² Russia = 17.13 million km² China = 9.597 million km² Telling the Yanks to go home after backing Germany's initiative in the Balkans. Fukoff ------ From theguardian Date: 26th of Jan 2022. Australia is considering supplying extra liquefied natural gas (LNG) to Europe after the US and the UK raised fears the continent’s reliance on Russia makes it vulnerable in a growing standoff with Vladimir Putin. A senior Biden administration official revealed the US was also “looking at the global flow of LNG – whether it’s from the United States or from Australia or from other places”. Qatar is also part of the energy supply talks. The official said Russia had already restricted the flow of gas through the pipeline running through Ukraine from about 100m cubic metres a day to 50m. The Australian resources minister, Keith Pitt, said Australia was “a leading and reliable global exporter of LNG” and “stands ready to assist with any request for further supplies”. “This shows how important Australian resources are to energy supplies around the world,” Pitt said in a statement. From The World Factbook Top natural gas exporters in m3/year (estimates) in 2020 1. Russia = 199,928,345,000 2. United States = 149,538,000,000 3. Qatar = 143,700,000,000 4. Norway = 112,951,000,000 5. Australia = 102,262,000,000
    1
  14032. 1
  14033. 1
  14034. 1
  14035. 1
  14036. 1
  14037. 1
  14038. 1
  14039. 1
  14040. 1
  14041. 1
  14042. 1
  14043. 1
  14044. 1
  14045. 1
  14046. 1
  14047. 1
  14048. 1
  14049. 1
  14050. 1
  14051. 1
  14052. 1
  14053.  NSA BUM  Your narrative is false. YAK COPIED THE SAME DESIGNED FLAW AS CONVAIR MODEL 200! Facts from Lockheed’s codeone magazine https://www.codeonemagazine.com/article.html?item_id=137 By the late 1960s, Pratt & Whitney was designing and testing a three-bearing swivel nozzle for use on the Convair Model 200 Sea Control fighter. Design drawings dated 1967 show detail design layouts. The first nozzle was built and tested on a Pratt & Whitney JT8D in the mid 1960s. The tests included operating the nozzle in full afterburner with the nozzle deflected ninety degrees. The test rig was positioned to exhaust upward to avoid heating the ground under the test stand, though subsequent tests positioned the nozzle downward at the ground to assess the effects of ground proximity back pressure on nozzle performance. ---- USA patent 1967 https://www.google.com/patents/US3429509 ---- Facts from Lockheed’s codeone magazine http://www.codeonemagazine.com/article.html?item_id=137 A great deal of misinformation has appeared on the Internet regarding the relationship of the Soviet Yak-41 (later Yak-141), NATO reporting name Freestyle, to the X-35 and the rest of the JSF program. The Pratt & Whitney 3BSD nozzle design predates the Russian work. In fact the 3BSD was tested with a real engine almost twenty years before the first flight of the Yak. Yakovlev was looking for money to keep its VTOL program alive, not having received any orders for a production version of the Yak-141. Lockheed provided a small amount of funding in return for obtaining performance data and limited design data on the Yak-141. US government personnel were allowed to examine the aircraft. *However, the 3BSN design was already in place on the X-35 before these visits*. ------ YAK copied the same flawed two forward hot engine cores design from Convair Model 200. F--35 has shaft-driven cool air stream forward lift fan. https://history.nasa.gov/SP-468/ch10-4.htm During F-14 design phase, look at Figure 10. 11, notice NASA's concept design in regards to the engine and horizontal tail design and F-35's tail design. https://history.nasa.gov/SP-468/p256.jpg The above picture is one of many F-14 study models which is before Yak 141. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19780008057.pdf https://crgis.ndc.nasa.gov/historic/File:L-74-2684.jpg Notice NASA's LFAX-8 concept design in regards to the engine and horizontal tail design which reappeared with F-35 The above picture is one of many F-15 study models which is before Yak 141. Since Lockheed Martin has taken over General Dynamics's Tactical Military Aircraft business Read http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/planes/q0236.shtml General Dynamics has proto-YF-16 model with dual side engine intakes, single engine and dual angled tail with horizontal stabs extending beyond engine nozzle design. Both F-35 and proto-YF-16 with dual side intakes has blended body design which is different upper wing mounted design on the Yak 141 Using F-16's blended wing design, F-35 has upper bias blended wing design which is different from upper wing mounted design Yak 141 or MiG 25/31 which are similar to North American (Rockwell)'s A-5 Vigilante . I have Lockheed Martin's official viewpoint against YAK 41 copied fake news. YAK DID NOT SOLVE THE FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEM WITH CONVAIR MODEL 200 i.e. forward hot air stream being ingested by the main engine which reduces engine thrust! Copying the same flaws as CONVAIR MODEL 200 shows your brained dead copying.
    1
  14054. 1
  14055. 1
  14056. 1
  14057.  @НикитаЛель-г8ы  Facts from Lockheed’s CodeOne magazine https://www.codeonemagazine.com/article.html?item_id=137 By the late 1960s, Pratt & Whitney was designing and testing a three-bearing swivel nozzle for use on the Convair Model 200 Sea Control fighter. Design drawings dated 1967 show detail design layouts. The first nozzle was built and tested on a Pratt & Whitney JT8D in the mid 1960s. *The tests included operating the nozzle in full afterburner with the nozzle deflected ninety degrees*. The test rig was positioned to exhaust upward to avoid heating the ground under the test stand, though subsequent tests positioned the nozzle downward at the ground to assess the effects of ground proximity back pressure on nozzle performance. Facts from Lockheed’s CodeOne magazine http://www.codeonemagazine.com/article.html?item_id=137 _A great deal of misinformation has appeared on the Internet regarding the relationship of the Soviet Yak-41 (later Yak-141), NATO reporting name Freestyle, to the X-35 and the rest of the JSF program_. _The Pratt & Whitney 3BSD nozzle design predates the Russian work_. _In fact, the 3BSD was tested with a real engine almost twenty years before the first flight of the Yak_. _Yakovlev was looking for money to keep its VTOL program alive, not having received any orders for a production version of the Yak-141. Lockheed provided a small amount of funding in return for obtaining performance data and limited design data on the Yak-141. US government personnel were allowed to examine the aircraft. However, the 3BSN design was already in place on the X-35 before these visits . _ Deal with it. YAK did NOT solve hot air being ingested by the main engine.
    1
  14058. 1
  14059. 1
  14060. 1
  14061. 1
  14062. 1
  14063. 1
  14064. 1
  14065. 1
  14066. 1
  14067. 1
  14068. 1
  14069. 1
  14070. 1
  14071. 1
  14072. 1
  14073. 1
  14074. 1
  14075. 1
  14076. 1
  14077. 1
  14078. 1
  14079. 1
  14080. 1
  14081. 1
  14082. 1
  14083. 1
  14084. 1
  14085. 1
  14086. 1
  14087. 1
  14088. 1
  14089. 1
  14090. 1
  14091. 1
  14092. 1
  14093. 1
  14094. 1
  14095. 1
  14096. 1
  14097. 1
  14098. 1
  14099. 1
  14100. 1
  14101. 1
  14102. 1
  14103. 1
  14104. 1
  14105. 1
  14106. 1
  14107. 1
  14108. 1
  14109. 1
  14110. 1
  14111. 1
  14112. 1
  14113. 1
  14114. 1
  14115. 1
  14116. 1
  14117. 1
  14118. 1
  14119. 1
  14120. 1
  14121. 1
  14122. 1
  14123. 1
  14124. 1
  14125. 1
  14126. 1
  14127. 1
  14128. 1
  14129. 1
  14130. 1
  14131. 1
  14132. 1
  14133. 1
  14134. 1
  14135. 1
  14136. 1
  14137. 1
  14138. 1
  14139. 1
  14140. 1
  14141. 1
  14142. 1
  14143. 1
  14144. 1
  14145. 1
  14146. 1
  14147. 1
  14148. 1
  14149. 1
  14150. 1
  14151. 1
  14152. 1
  14153. 1
  14154. 1
  14155. 1
  14156. 1
  14157. 1
  14158. 1
  14159. 1
  14160. 1
  14161. 1
  14162. 1
  14163. 1
  14164. 1
  14165. 1
  14166. 1
  14167. 1
  14168. 1
  14169. 1
  14170.  @yfelwulf  https://www.forbes.com/sites/douglasbulloch/2016/10/12/protectionism-may-be-rising-around-the-world-but-in-china-it-never-went-away/#5dc3f5df73da Protectionism May Be Rising Around The World, But In China It Never Went Away Promises unkept? Since joining the WTO in 2001, China has repeatedly insisted that it will live up to those undertakings made on entry. In particular, the use of currency manipulation has been identified by the US as a breech of the commitment to end price controls for the purposes of protecting domestic industries. This became a major political issue from 2005 onwards, and has only recently subsided because it is assumed that the RMB is slightly overvalued on the market. Nevertheless, for years it was deliberate policy for the PBoC to accumulate US Dollars and suppress the exchange rate for the RMB, resulting in exactly the price distortions China had committed to eliminate in 2001, and fuelling an enormous trade surplus with the US, which persists and expands to this day. Furthermore TRIPS implementation has been given some effect on paper, but has made little progress when it comes to 'enforcement.' This is (according to the WTO) as recently as February 2015, fully 14 years after TRIPS was supposed to be already in effect. The US Trade Representative produces an annual report to Congress on China's WTO compliance which leaves little room to conclude they have so far lived up to their accession commitments. The most recent several-hundred-page document - produced in December 2015 - recites a long list of small measures, committees established, announcements made and new administrative complications faced, all continuing disputes over an agreement theoretically in effect since 2001. Although, therefore, protectionism is rising around the world, it is also true to say that existing practices of protectionism have not fallen in the way that they should have since China's accession to the WTO in 2001. Because of this lack of progress in easing trade, the extended period of currency manipulation, the lack of observance of TRIPS and the sheer administrative resistance exporters face when trying to get their products into China, we now face of world of highly unbalanced trade, and rising mistrust. And it is this that is leading to rising protectionism; the simple fact that it never went away. --------
    1
  14171.  @yfelwulf  Note that China has a "Negative List of Market Access Restricted: Sector-wise items" which is known as CCP's protectionist list. CCP is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about Australia's reciprocal protectionist policies e.g. Australian entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. ------------------------ China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  14172. 1
  14173. 1
  14174. 1
  14175. 1
  14176. 1
  14177. 1
  14178. 1
  14179. 1
  14180. 1
  14181. 1
  14182. 1
  14183. 1
  14184. 1
  14185. 1
  14186. 1
  14187. 1
  14188. 1
  14189. 1
  14190. 1
  14191. 1
  14192. 1
  14193. 1
  14194. 1
  14195. 1
  14196. 1
  14197. 1
  14198. 1
  14199. 1
  14200. 1
  14201. 1
  14202. 1
  14203. 1
  14204. 1
  14205. 1
  14206. 1
  14207. 1
  14208. 1
  14209. 1
  14210. 1
  14211. 1
  14212. 1
  14213. 1
  14214. 1
  14215. 1
  14216. 1
  14217. 1
  14218. 1
  14219. 1
  14220. 1
  14221. 1
  14222. 1
  14223. 1
  14224. 1
  14225. 1
  14226. 1
  14227. 1
  14228. 1
  14229. 1
  14230. 1
  14231. 1
  14232. 1
  14233. 1
  14234. 1
  14235. 1
  14236. 1
  14237. 1
  14238. 1
  14239. 1
  14240. 1
  14241. 1
  14242. 1
  14243. 1
  14244. Martin Eberhardt and Mark Terpenning didn't execute mass production Tesla Model S and Model 3. Marc Tarpenning serving as Telsa's CEO until 2007. Marc had served as the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and subsequently the Vice President (of Electrical Engineering) of Tesla until 2008. Tesla Roadster was released in 2008 and it's not in mass production when compared to Model S. Tesla was founded in 2003. Musk joined Tesla in 2004. Musk led the Series A round of investment in February 2004, joining Tesla's board of directors as its chairman. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Tesla,_Inc. Musk took an active role within the company and oversaw Roadster product design at a detailed level, but was not deeply involved in day-to-day business operations.[10] Eberhard acknowledged that Musk was the person who insisted from the beginning on a carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer body and he led design of components ranging from the power electronics module to the headlamps and other styling.[11] In addition to his daily operational roles, Musk was the controlling investor in Tesla from the first financing round, funding the large majority of the Series A capital investment round of US$7.5 million with personal funds. The insignia of Tesla Motors as seen on a Tesla Roadster Sport From the beginning, Musk consistently maintained that Tesla's long-term strategic goal was to create affordable mass market electric vehicles.[12] Musk received the Global Green 2006 product design award for his design of the Tesla Roadster, presented by Mikhail Gorbachev,[13] and he received the 2007 Index Design award for his design of the Tesla Roadster.[14]
    1
  14245. 1
  14246. 1
  14247. 1
  14248. 1
  14249. 1
  14250. 1
  14251. 1
  14252. 1
  14253. 1
  14254. 1
  14255. 1
  14256. 1
  14257. 1
  14258.  @radiopete7290  Date: 22 Oct 2021 NSW Supreme Court dismisses challenges to vaccine mandates The Supreme Court of New South Wales has upheld a number of public health orders that require employees of particular industries to be vaccinated against COVID-19, dismissing challenges made by a number of health, aged care, education and construction workers in the State Background The spread of the Delta variant of COVID-19 caused lengthy lockdowns to be imposed across NSW, and the message conveyed by the NSW Government was that the only way out of lockdown would be through the mass vaccination of the eligible population. In addition to announcing that only fully vaccinated people would be able to enjoy additional freedoms when the state reopened, Health Minister Brad Hazard (“the Minister”) passed a number of public health orders (“the Orders”) which imposed requirements on workers in the health, aged care, education and construction industries, and additionally on workers that live in a Local Government Area (“LGA”) of concern and leave that LGA to perform authorised work, to be vaccinated against COVID-19 within various timeframes. The Orders require employers of such workers to obtain evidence of their workforce’s vaccination status, and prevent employers from offering work to employees that do not comply with the Orders. The Minister made these Orders under section 7(2) of the Public Health Act 2010 (“the PHA”), which empowers the Minister to make such directions to reduce or remove public health risks and to control movement to and from areas subject to public health risks. A total of ten workers across the health, aged care, education and construction industries, who had made the choice not to get vaccinated, challenged the validity of the Orders in the Supreme Court of New South Wales (“the Court”). The challenges were heard together, and the Court published its decision in the single judgment of Kassam v Hazzard; Henry v Hazzard [2021] NSWSC 1320 (“the Decision”) on 15 October 2021. The Orders In the context of the 107-day lockdown imposed on the Greater Sydney Area and countless regional lockdowns across NSW, the Minister implemented a number of public health orders under the PHA, including the following: Public Health (COVID-19 Additional Restrictions for Delta Outbreak) Order (No 2) – which provided that an authorised worker that lived in an LGA of concern must have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine by 30 August 2021, and that construction workers must have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine by 23 September 2021; Public Health (COVID–19 Care Services) Order 2021– which provides that aged care workers must have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine by 17 September 2021, and be fully vaccinated by 31 October 2021; Public Health (COVID–19 Vaccination of Education and Care Workers) Order 2021 (– which provides that education workers must be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 by 8 November 2021; and Public Health (COVID-19 Vaccination of Health Care Workers) Order 2021 – which provides that healthcare workers must have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine by 30 September 2021, and be fully vaccinated by 30 November 2021. While the first of these Orders has now been repealed due to the Government lifting additional restrictions on LGAs of concern, the remainder are still in effect. Each of the Orders require that employers in these industries must collect and maintain a record of the vaccination status of their employees. Section 10 of the PHA prescribes that it is an offence to fail to comply with a public health order; and penalties for non-compliance include fines of up to $11,000 or six months’ imprisonment for individuals or $55,000 fines for corporations, plus additional fines for repeated non-compliance. This means that both employees and employers that do not comply with the Orders may face punishment. The Plaintiffs’ Arguments The plaintiffs that disputed the Orders made a number of arguments as to why they thought the Orders were invalid and should be quashed by the Court. The reasons put forward by the plaintiffs were as follows: The Minister did not undertake any real exercise of power in making the Orders; The Orders are an unreasonable exercise of the power of section 7 of the PHA because of the effect on the right to bodily autonomy of workers that did not wish to be vaccinated; The Orders confer powers on police officers that are inconsistent with the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW); The Orders, and section 7 of the PHA, must be rendered invalid as they are inconsistent with section 51(xxxiiiA) of the Constitution (which prevents states from creating laws that have the effect of imposing a civil conscription on its citizens); The Minister failed to have regard to various relevant considerations, and failed to afford the plaintiffs natural justice when introducing the Orders; and/or The Orders are inconsistent with the Australian Immunisation Register Act 2015 (Cth) and are therefore invalid under section 109 of the Constitution (which prescribes that any State law which is inconsistent with Federal law shall be invalid). The plaintiff’s argument was heavily reliant on questioning the appropriateness of vaccinations, and reflected their general objections to receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. Principally, the plaintiffs contended that the Orders interfere with a person’s right to bodily integrity, and relied on evidence that supported alternative treatments, questioned the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, downplayed the severity of COVID-19, and asserted that COVID-19 vaccines are “experimental”. The Decision The Court rejected each argument put forward by the plaintiffs and dismissed the Proceedings. Justice Beech-Jones made the following findings with respect to the plaintiffs’ arguments: Section 7(2) of the PHA clearly authorises significant limitations on freedom of movement in the context of a public health risk, and the Minister acted within the powers vested by this section; The Orders do not violate any right to bodily integrity as they do not authorise that anyone be involuntarily vaccinated; rather, they restrict a person’s freedom of movement to varying levels dependent on whether that person is vaccinated or unvaccinated; The powers vested on police officers with respect to enforcing the Orders are not inconsistent with other State legislation; The Orders are not inconsistent with any provision of the Constitution; No duty to afford procedural fairness arose in the circumstances that the Orders were made, as the Orders affect a very wide class of persons; and The Orders are not inconsistent with any provision of Federal legislation. His Honour further noted that it was not the role of the Court to “conclusively resolve legitimate debates concerning the appropriate treatments for COVID-19 or the effectiveness of the vaccines”, and that such considerations are “matters of merits, policy and fact for the decision-maker” – in this case the Minister. As such, the plaintiffs’ evidence that generally questioned the efficacy and utility of COVID-19 vaccines was of little relevance to the Decision. ------------------------- Again, prove your argument in court in front of the judge!
    1
  14259. 1
  14260. 1
  14261. 1
  14262. 1
  14263. 1
  14264. 1
  14265. 1
  14266. 1
  14267. 1
  14268. 1
  14269. 1
  14270. 1
  14271. 1
  14272. 1
  14273. 1
  14274. 1
  14275. 1
  14276. 1
  14277. 1
  14278. 1
  14279. 1
  14280. 1
  14281. 1
  14282. 1
  14283. 1
  14284. 1
  14285. 1
  14286. 1
  14287. 1
  14288. 1
  14289. Original source (non-English) http://suomenkuvalehti.fi/jutut/kotimaa/suomella-vahvat-ilmavoimat-mutta-kuinka-kauan/ Frisian Flag 2012 exercises in Holland, Finnish F-18C Hornets gets 100 kills and 6 loses against Eurofighter (Germany, UK), Polish new F-16 and older F-16 planes (Norway, Belgium) and Gripen (Swedish) Finish F-18C has 16:1 kill ratio against Eurofighter, F-16C Block 52, F-16A MLU and Gripen C/D. https://youtu.be/Bu8G5ABHKc8?t=4183 Around 1 :09:51, RAAF commander mentioned how the Super Hornet had a positive kill ratio in excess of 20 to 1 against the Alaska aggressors F-16 in an exercise in Australia more than a year ago. Australia's F-18F Block 2 has 20:1 kill ratio against F-16s. Super Hornet has lower RCS when compared to any F-16s F-35A has similar kill ratio like Super Hornet. https://theaviationist.com/2017/02/28/red-flag-confirmed-f-35-dominance-with-a-201-kill-ratio-u-s-air-force-says/ F-35A = F-18C or F-18E with turbo and stealth. http://nettsteder.regjeringen.no/kampfly/2015/11/20/a-fly-f-35-erfaringer-fra-den-forste-uka/ More F-16 vs F-35 from Norwegian pilot. I quote Overall, flying the F-35 reminds me a bit of flying the F/A-18 Hornet, but with an important difference: It has been fitted with a turbo http://www.f-16.net/forum/download/file.php?id=26173 To The FUTURE Jan/Feb 2018 ANDREW MCLAUGHLIN; Aust Aviation Magazine "...To the future A former classic Hornet pilot, WGCDR Clare provides an interesting comparison between the old and new aircraft. “The F-35 actually flies very, very similarly to the Hornet, both classic and Super,” he related. “In fact, it’s probably more like the Super in the way it feels. The alpha (angle of attack performance) and the power is similar to a Super Hornet, although it’s got a little bit more power down low. Against S400 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DN-A6PWRFno The video shows F-35's IRST capabilities with tracking/detection >1300Km range. F-35's EO-DAS has 360 degrees IRST distributive sensors with detection range around >1300Km. F-35's 360 degree IRST distributive sensors can feed data to anti-ballistics missile/Aegis combat systems. http://www.defensetech.org/2015/01/22/navy-to-integrate-f-35-with-beyond-the-horizon-technology/ Linking Aegis combat system with F-35. https://news.vice.com/article/us-defense-secretary-announces-navy-can-blow-up-anything-it-wants-any-time-it-wants A test SM missile was fired from USN Aegis ship and track/target data driven by F-35.
    1
  14290. 1
  14291. 1
  14292. 1
  14293. 1
  14294. 1
  14295. 1
  14296. 1
  14297. 1
  14298. 1
  14299. 1
  14300. 1
  14301. 1
  14302. 1
  14303. 1
  14304. 1
  14305. 1
  14306. 1
  14307. 1
  14308. 1
  14309. 1
  14310. 1
  14311. 1
  14312. 1
  14313. 1
  14314. 1
  14315. 1
  14316. 1
  14317. 1
  14318. 1
  14319. 1
  14320. 1
  14321. 1
  14322. 1
  14323. 1
  14324. 1
  14325. 1
  14326. 1
  14327. 1
  14328. 1
  14329. 1
  14330. 1
  14331. 1
  14332.  @oliver6224  Fact: China's conquest of Taiwan existed as part of Qing's Imperial China's executing its imperialist Ten Great Campaigns with Taiwan was one of many conquest targets when it was countered by Imperial Japan. This issue existed before the US being a superpower. U.S.-China Joint Communiques (Shanghai Communiqué) are irrelevant since this unelected Henry Kissinger / Richard Nixon initiative didn't pass US Congress. US Congress's "Taiwan Relations Act" is a legislative bill against Jimmy Carter's unilaterally termination of the US Congress-passed Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty (SAMDT), a defense pact signed between the United States and the Republic of China (Taiwan) effective from 1955 to 1980. US Congress House speaker is effectively a Prime Minster position. The US Congress House speaker is the leader of the governing political party that can formulate legislative bills just like any other Commonwealth countries' Prime Minster's governing political party. The US President has Executive Order and veto powers which US Congress can override by passing the act by a two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate. Taiwan Relations Act does NOT recognize the terminology of the "Republic of China" but used "governing authorities on Taiwan". The US Congress The Taiwan Relations Act provides for Taiwan to be treated under U.S. laws the same as "foreign countries, nations, states, governments, or similar entities", thus treating Taiwan as a sub-sovereign foreign state equivalent. The US supports the "One China" policy with Taiwan not being not part of PRC. The "Six Assurances" to Taiwan (under the Reagan administration) 1. The United States would not set a date for termination of arms sales to Taiwan. 2. The United States would not alter the terms of the Taiwan Relations Act. 3. The United States would not consult with China in advance before making decisions about U.S. arms sales to Taiwan. 4. The United States would not mediate between Taiwan and China. 5. The United States would not alter its position about the sovereignty of Taiwan which was, that the question was one to be decided peacefully by the Chinese themselves, and would not pressure Taiwan to enter into negotiations with China. 6. The United States would not formally recognize Chinese sovereignty over Taiwan.
    1
  14333.  @oliver6224  Read "Taiwan Policy Act of 2022." TITLE I: UNITED STATES POLICY TOWARD TAIWAN SEC.101. Declaration of Policy. Reaffirms the Taiwan Relations Act and the Six Assurances. Establishes objectives to support the security of Taiwan and its democratic, economic, and military institutions, promote stability in cross-Strait relations, support Taiwan’s inclusion in the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, and deter the PRC’s aggression towards Taiwan SEC.102. Treatment of the Government of Taiwan. Directs the U.S. federal government to engage with the democratic government of Taiwan as the legitimate representative of the people of Taiwan. Prohibits restrictions on federal government official interactions with counterparts in the Government of Taiwan. SEC.103. Taiwan Symbols of Sovereignty. Not to be construed as entailing restoration of diplomatic relations with Taiwan or altering the U.S. position on Taiwan’s international status, directs the Secretary of State to rescind administrative guidance that inhibits Taiwanese officials from displaying symbols of Taiwanese sovereignty, including the flag of the Republic of China. SEC.104. Designation and References to Taiwan Representative Office. Establishes de facto diplomatic treatment for Taiwan equivalent to other foreign governments. Directs the Secretary of State to negotiate the renaming of the “Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office” to the “Taiwan Representative Office” and adjust all references accordingly. SEC.105. Senate Confirmation of the Director of the Taipei Office of the American Institute in Taiwan. Requires Senate confirmation for the Director of the American Institute in Taiwan’s (Taipei office) and bestows the title “Representative” for such office. US interpretation of the "One China" policy is different from PRC's "One China" policy. KMT taking over Taiwan doesn't change Taiwan's sovereignty status i.e. refer to "Six Assurances" Point Six's The United States would not formally recognize Chinese sovereignty over Taiwan.
    1
  14334. 1
  14335. 1
  14336. 1
  14337. 1
  14338. 1
  14339. 1
  14340. 1
  14341. 1
  14342. 1
  14343. 1
  14344. 1
  14345. 1
  14346. 1
  14347.  sam sam  1. Announcement of China's Declaration of War on Japan. . Irrelevant. China (from either CPC or KMT) did NOT destroy Imperial Japan's naval power and Taiwan is an island. It was mostly US's naval firepower that destroyed Imperial Japan's naval power. 2. Against Cairo Declaration. Refer to Chiang Kai-Shek Supplementing The Act Of Surrender 1945 excluded Manchuria, Formosa, and French Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude. Order Of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-Shek Supplementing The Act Of Surrender 1945 This is order No. 1 of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek to the Japanese forces in China, excluding Manchuria, Formosa, and French Indo-China north of 16 degrees of north latitude, which were surrendered under the act of 9 September 1945. This order supplements the acts of surrender to the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers and his General Order No. 1. ----- There are opposing views on the legality of the KMT takeover of Taiwan. The Chinese Communist government maintains to this day that the Republic of China on Taiwan is a province that must eventually return to rule by the mainland. According to an article published in 1955 on the legal status of Taiwan, "It has been charged that Chiang Kai-shek has no claim to the island because he is 'merely a fugitive quartering his army' there and besides, his is a government in exile." Moreover, the Treaty of San Francisco, which was officially signed by 48 nations on 8 September 1951, did not specify to whom Japan was ceding Taiwan and the Pescadores. Despite this, the ROC was viewed by the vast majority of states at the time as the legitimate representative of China, as it had succeeded the Qing Dynasty, while the PRC was at the time a mostly unrecognized state. Japan was, at the time of the signing of the Treaty of San Francisco, still technically under American occupation. After full independence, Japan established full relations with the ROC and not the PRC. According to Professor Gene Hsiao, "since the San Francisco Peace Treaty and the separate KMT treaty with Japan did not specify to whom Japan was ceding Taiwan and the Pescadores, the implication of the U.S. position was that legally, and insofar as the signatories of those two treaties were concerned, Taiwan became an 'ownerless' island and the KMT, by its own assent to the American policy, a foreign government-in-exile." Technically, KMT is a foreign government in exile under the American occupation of Japanese Taiwan islands.
    1
  14348. 1
  14349. 1
  14350. 1
  14351.  @GenghisX999  >” west enrich the 1% and sow chaos and war throughout the world. FALSE. The Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". --------------- In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical. USSR's proxy attempted to remove Chile's check-and-balance Congress system. USSR's proxy attempted to concentrate political power into a single entity (individual and political party). The US has no problems with the Swedish-style nanny market led-socialism that is practiced in the CANZUK and Nordic groups.
    1
  14352. 1
  14353.  @GenghisX999  CPC is a hypocrite when it has higher protectionist policies while complaining about the West's reciprocal protectionist advocacy e.g. Foreign entities can't buy land nor invest in certain sectors such as farming and mining in China, hence a no-brainer when countries imposed reciprocal investment restrictions. China Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited. Look in the mirror.
    1
  14354. 1
  14355.  @DancingTWsFrogs  1. Historical facts: On the eve of the 1894 Sino-Japanese War, about 45 percent of the island was administered under the Manchus Qing administration (Imperial China) while the remaining was populated by Taiwanese aborigines. The Treaty of Shimonoseki is meaningless for the independent Republic of Formosa, hence the reason for Imperial Japan's kinetic war against the independent Republic of Formosa and the native Taiwanese tribal authorities. Qing's Imperial China couldn't enforce the Treaty of Shimonosek on the independent Republic of Formosa and the native Taiwanese tribal authorities. Qing's Imperial China did NOT have control over the independent Republic of Formosa and the native Taiwanese population. 2. 1972 Shanghai Communiqué has a condition i.e. peaceful settlement of the Taiwan question. If CPC initiates a hot war against Taiwan, it's CPC that will break the Shanghai Communiqué's commitment. ------ If CPC wants to revert back to Qing's Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns foreign policy and execute it, then a small nation with nuclear-armed can cause disproportionate damage to a larger country. It was the US who told Taiwan to remove its nuclear weapons program. My argument position is to remove all US initiatives that stop US allies' nuclear weapons programs i.e. I want to see US security assurances and treaties fail. Attack Taiwan, DO IT! There's a reason why countries like Australia are getting closer to nuclear-armed state status and demands from SK and JP for nuclear-armed readiness. Removing "rules-based order" will lead to many nuclear weapons armed states.
    1
  14356. 1
  14357. 1
  14358. 1
  14359. 1
  14360. 1
  14361. 1
  14362. 1
  14363. 1
  14364. 1
  14365. 1
  14366. 1
  14367. 1
  14368. 1
  14369. 1
  14370. 1
  14371. 1
  14372. 1
  14373. 1
  14374. 1
  14375. 1
  14376. 1
  14377. 1
  14378. 1
  14379. 1
  14380. 1
  14381. 1
  14382. 1
  14383. 1
  14384. 1
  14385. 1
  14386. 1
  14387. 1
  14388. 1
  14389. 1
  14390. 1
  14391. 1
  14392. 1
  14393. 1
  14394. 1
  14395. 1
  14396. 1
  14397. 1
  14398. 1
  14399. 1
  14400. 1
  14401. 1
  14402. 1
  14403. 1
  14404. 1
  14405. 1
  14406. 1
  14407. 1
  14408. 1
  14409. 1
  14410. 1
  14411. 1
  14412. 1
  14413. 1
  14414. 1
  14415. 1
  14416. 1
  14417. 1
  14418. 1
  14419.  @StofStuiver  >Yet is was the US that staged a coup in Ukrain and stoked division of Russian peoples. FALSE. Date: Jan. 7, 2010 Yanukovych: Ukraine will remain a neutral state. "It’s certain that Ukraine was and will be non-aligned state… We strive neither to join NATO nor the [CIS]CSTO [Collective Security Treaty Organization]. We’ll maintain a neutral status," Yanukovych said in an interview with the Komsomolskaya Pravda in Ukraine newspaper. -------- The trigger for Euromaidan was Yanukovych initiated non-neutrality policies such as joining a trade block instead of executing Switzerland-style neutrality. UK leaving the EU and joining CPTPP proves freedom of association. Before Euromaidan, Russia, however, has successfully used political and economic leverage to dissuade Ukraine from signing the E.U. deal. In the months prior to the Vilnius summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a trade war with Kiev, blocking nearly all imports from Ukraine and cutting energy supplies to the country. In turn, this reduced Ukrainian exports by 25 percent and shrank the economy by 1.5 percent. Some trade background for the context From Tradebarrier Index (lower score = less trade barriers) New Zealand's tariff score is 2.92 Australia's tariff score is 3.03 UK's tariff score is 3.94 (after Brexit) Japan's tariff score is 4.05 US's tariff score is 4.54 Germany's tariff score is 4.88 EU's tariff score is 4.88 Russia's tariff score is 6.16 <-------- China's tariff score is 6.8 <------ Russia wants to maintain its higher trade protectionist policies. You fukof,f go back to Russia.
    1
  14420. 1
  14421. 1
  14422. 1
  14423. 1
  14424. 1
  14425. 1
  14426. 1
  14427. 1
  14428.  @toxicelamain2494  Poland has support from the United Kingdom and the United States (hint: large-scale US natural gas imports into the EU is via Polish LNG terminals). When hydrocarbon issues are involved, the US has a higher active interest e.g. U.S. military brought the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit to Limassol, Cyprus, on the USS Iwo Jima LHD flattop as Exxon Mobil commenced exploratory drilling in the region. USS Iwo Jima has F-35B on board. US self-interest trumps Turkey's. United Kingdom, Poland, and Ukraine have signed a security pact independent of NATO. ----- The United States remained Europe’s top supplier of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the first 3 months of 2021 as it continued to gain market share at the expense of Russia and Qatar, Europe’s second- and third-largest sources of LNG, according to the EU Commission’s latest European Gas Market Report. The US supplied 24% (4.2 Bcm) of the EU’s overall LNG imports (17 Bcm in Q1 2021); Russia placed second at 21% (3.7 Bcm); and Qatar was third at 18% (3.1 Bcm), the EU Commission reported in early July. When compared to Q4 2020, the US picked up 2% market share from January to March this year, while Russia bested Qatar to become Europe’s second-largest LNG supplier. Nigeria placed fourth, followed by Algeria and Trinidad and Tobago. A review of EU Commission reports dating back to 2019 reveals a steady quarter-to-quarter decline in Europe’s LNG purchases while it also documents the growing rivalry between the US and Russia, Qatar’s fall from dominance, and the emergence of the US as Europe’s top LNG supplier starting Q4 2019. The EU is the world’s third-largest LNG market, though its imports amounted to only about half that of Japan (36 Bcm) and China (32 Bcm) in Q1 2021. European gas consumption rose 7.6% to 132 Bcm in Q1 based on a year-on-year comparison. The commission noted that demand for gas as fuel to generate electricity rose 3.4%, also year-on-year (increasing by 4.9 TWh.) ------ Spain is not dependent on Russian gas since the majority of its gas supplies are from Algeria and Morocco via the Maghreb-Europe gas pipeline (MGE) The UK is not dependent on Russian natural gas, making up less than 4% of our supply. Ministers are also exploring options to reduce this further. The Prime Minister confirmed that the government will set out an energy strategy to set out the UK’s long-term plans for greater energy security, including both renewable and domestic oil and gas supplies.
    1
  14429. 1
  14430. 1
  14431. 1
  14432. 1
  14433. 1
  14434. 1
  14435. 1
  14436. 1
  14437. 1
  14438. 1
  14439. 1
  14440. 1
  14441. 1
  14442. 1
  14443. 1
  14444. 1
  14445. 1
  14446. 1
  14447. 1
  14448. 1
  14449. 1
  14450. 1
  14451. 1
  14452.  @jont2576  Trump is correct on the EU's higher tariffs when compared to the US. It's a no-brainer when countries and advocates want to impose reciprocal investment and trade restrictions. --- China's Negative List 2020 Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  14453. 1
  14454. 1
  14455. 1
  14456. 1
  14457. 1
  14458. 1
  14459. 1
  14460. 1
  14461. 1
  14462. 1
  14463. 1
  14464. 1
  14465. 1
  14466. 1
  14467. 1
  14468.  pure mind  China Negative List 2020 (aka Protectionist list) Category 1: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries 1. The proportion of Chinese companies in the selection and seed production of new varieties of wheat should not be less than 34%. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the selection and seed production of new varieties of corn. 2. Investment in the development, breeding, cultivation, and production of related reproductive materials (including the good genes of the cultivation, animal husbandry, and aquaculture industries) of rare and unique Chinese varieties is prohibited. 3. It is prohibited to invest in the selection and breeding of genetically modified varieties of crops, livestock and poultry, and the production of genetically modified seeds (seedlings). 4. It is forbidden to invest in the fishing of aquatic products in the sea areas under China’s jurisdiction and inland waters. Category 2: Mining 5. Investment in rare earth, radioactive minerals, tungsten exploration, mining, and mineral processing is prohibited. Category 3: Manufacturing 6. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the publishing & printing industry. 7. It is prohibited to invest in the application of traditional Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, such as steaming, frying, roasting and calcining, etc. It is prohibited to invest in the production of traditional Chinese medicine confidential prescription products. 8. The Chinese share of vehicle manufacturing companies should not be less not than 50%, except for the special and new energy vehicles, commercial vehicles. (In 2022 the restriction of foreign share ratio in passenger car manufacturing and the restriction of the same foreign company can establish two or fewer joint ventures in China to produce similar vehicle products will be removed.) 9. It is prohibited to invest in satellite TV broadcast ground receiving facilities and key parts production. Category 4: Electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply 10. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. Category 5: Wholesale and retail 11. It is prohibited to invest in the wholesale and retail of tobacco leaves, cigarettes, re-baked tobacco leaves, and other tobacco products. Category 6: Transport, warehousing, and postal services 12. It is required that Chinese companies have a controlling stake in domestic water transport. 13. Chinese public air transport enterprises shall be controlled by the Chinese side and if the proportion of investment by a foreign investor and its affiliated enterprises shall not exceed 25%, the legal representative shall be a Chinese citizen. The legal representative of General airlines must be a Chinese citizen, of which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries airlines shall be limited to joint ventures and other general-purpose airlines shall be limited to Chinese holdings. 14. Chinese companies must have a controlling stake in the construction and operation of civil airports. 15. It is prohibited to invest in the domestic express services provided by postal companies (and to operate postal services) and letters. Category 7: Information transmission, software, and information technology services 16. Pursuant to China’s commitment to open the telecommunication sector to foreign investment, companies may have a value-added telecommunications business with no more than 50% of the shares belonging to foreign companies (except e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, storage and forwarding categories, call centers). The basic telecommunications business must be controlled by the Chinese partner. 17. It is prohibited to invest in Internet news information services, internet publishing services, network audio-visual program services, Internet cultural operation (except music), and Internet public information services (except for the contents already opened in China’s WTO accession commitments). Category 8: Leasing and business services 18. It is prohibited to invest in Chinese legal affairs (except for information on the environmental impact of Chinese law), it is prohibited to be partners of domestic law firms. 19. Market research is limited to joint ventures company, and involving radio and television listening and viewing surveys is limited to joint ventures in which the Chinese company owns a controlling stake. 20. Investment in social surveys is prohibited. Category 9: Scientific research and technology services 21. Investment in human stem cells, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technology development and application are prohibited. 22. Investment in humanities and social science research institutions is prohibited. 23. It is prohibited to invest in geodesy, marine mapping, surveying and aerial photography, ground movement surveys, administrative area boundary mapping, topographic maps, maps of world political areas, maps of national political areas, maps of provincial and below political areas, national teaching maps, local teaching maps, true 3D maps and navigational electronic maps, regional geological mapping, mineral geology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental geology, geological disasters, remote sensing geology, etc. (Mining owner which working within the scope of mining rights is not restricted by this special management measure.) Category 10: Education 24. Pre-school, ordinary high schools, and higher education institutions are limited to Sino-foreign cooperative running of schools and shall be controlled by the Chinese side (the principal or principal administrative officer shall have Chinese nationality and live in China. Board members should be Chinese, and the board of directors or joint management committee shall not have a ratio of less than 1/2. 25. Investment in compulsory education institutions and religious educational institutions is prohibited. Category 11: Health and social work 26. Medical institutions are limited to joint ventures and cooperation. Category 12: Culture, sports, and entertainment 27. Investment in news organizations (including but not limited to news agencies) is prohibited. 28. Investment in the editing, publication, and production of books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products, and electronic publications is prohibited. 29. It is prohibited to invest in radio stations, television stations, radio and television channels, radio and television transmission coverage networks, and related infrastructure(Launch station, relay station, radio, and television satellite, satellite uplink station, satellite receiving, and transferring station, microwave station, monitoring station, and cable radio and television transmission coverage network, etc.). It is prohibited to engage in radio and television video-on-demand services and to install services at satellite television broadcast ground receiving facilities. 30. It is prohibited to invest in the production and operation of radio and television programs (including the introduction of business) companies. 31. It is prohibited to invest in film production companies, distribution companies, cinema chains companies, and film introduction business. 32. Auction companies, cultural relics stores, and state-owned cultural relics museums prohibit investment in auctions of cultural relics. 33. Investment in performing arts groups is prohibited.
    1
  14469. 1
  14470. 1
  14471. 1
  14472. 1
  14473. 1
  14474. 1
  14475. 1
  14476. 1
  14477. 1
  14478. 1
  14479. 1
  14480. 1
  14481. 1
  14482. 1
  14483. 1
  14484. 1
  14485. 1
  14486. 1
  14487. 1
  14488. 1
  14489. 1
  14490. 1
  14491. 1
  14492. 1
  14493. 1
  14494. 1
  14495. 1
  14496. 1
  14497. 1
  14498. 1
  14499. 1
  14500. 1
  14501. 1
  14502. 1
  14503. 1
  14504. 1
  14505. 1
  14506. 1
  14507. 1
  14508. 1
  14509. 1
  14510. 1
  14511. 1
  14512. 1
  14513. 1
  14514. 1
  14515. 1
  14516. 1
  14517. 1
  14518. 1
  14519. 1
  14520. 1
  14521. 1
  14522. 1
  14523. 1
  14524. 1
  14525. 1
  14526. 1
  14527. 1
  14528. 1
  14529. 1
  14530. 1
  14531. 1
  14532. 1
  14533. 1
  14534. 1
  14535. 1
  14536. 1
  14537. 1
  14538. 1
  14539. 1
  14540. 1
  14541. 1
  14542. 1
  14543. Australia's One China policy is based on Jim Carter's One China policy. Q1: What is the U.S. “One China” policy? Why does it exist? A1: When the United States moved to recognize the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and de-recognize the Republic of China (ROC) in 1979, the United States stated that the government of the People’s Republic of China was “the sole legal Government of China.” Sole, meaning the PRC was and is the only China, with no consideration of the ROC as a separate sovereign entity. The United States did not, however, give in to Chinese demands that it recognize Chinese sovereignty over Taiwan (which is the name preferred by the United States since it opted to de-recognize the ROC). Instead, Washington acknowledged the Chinese position that Taiwan was part of China. For geopolitical reasons, both the United States and the PRC were willing to go forward with diplomatic recognition despite their differences on this matter. When China attempted to change the Chinese text from the original acknowledge to recognize, Deputy Secretary of State Warren Christopher told a Senate hearing questioner, “[W]e regard the English text as being the binding text. We regard the word ‘acknowledge’ as being the word that is determinative for the U.S.” In the August 17, 1982, U.S.-China Communique, the United States went one step further, stating that it had no intention of pursuing a policy of “two Chinas” or “one China, one Taiwan.” Q2: What is the U.S. position on who has sovereignty over Taiwan? A2: In the San Francisco Treaty of Peace of 1951, Japan renounced “all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores.” Neither the Republic of China nor the People’s Republic of China were parties to the treaty, and thus neither was declared a beneficiary of the Japanese renouncement. While President Richard Nixon’s private notes show him willing to recognize the status of Taiwan as determined and part of China, subsequent U.S. documents and statements show the United States as having no position on the Taiwan sovereignty question. The U.S. position regarding sovereignty over Taiwan remains steady and consistent with its “one China policy”: both sides of the Taiwan Strait should mutually and peacefully agree to a resolution of this as yet unsettled issue. The United States doesn’t agree with Beijing’s claim to sovereignty over Taiwan, nor does it agree with Taipei that the ROC is an independent, sovereign state.
    1
  14544. 1
  14545. 1
  14546. 1
  14547. 1
  14548. 1
  14549. 1
  14550. 1
  14551. 1
  14552. 1
  14553. 1
  14554. 1
  14555. 1
  14556. 1
  14557. 1
  14558. 1
  14559. 1
  14560. 1
  14561. 1
  14562. 1
  14563. 1
  14564. 1
  14565. 1
  14566. 1
  14567. 1
  14568. RCS has related function with enemy radar's detection and track distance. For example, Russian Zaslon-M can detect a bomber with RCS of 20 m^2 from 400 km away and track the same 20 m^2 target about 200 km away. External missiles equipped F-35B (only external missile significantly contribute to the total RCS) will still have less RCS than similar equipped SU-33 (both aircraft and missile significantly contribute to the total RCS). Furthermore (against your standard high frequency radars comments), Lockheed Martin Corporation's year 2010 stealth fiber material patent which covers more than standard high frequency radars http://www.google.com/patents/US20100271253#v=onepage&q&f=false SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In some aspects, embodiments disclosed herein relate to a radar absorbing composite that includes a (CNT)-infused fiber material disposed in at least a portion of a matrix material. The composite is capable of absorbing radar in a frequency range from between about 0.10 Megahertz to about 60 Gigahertz. The CNT-infused fiber material forms a first layer that reduces radar reflectance and a second layer that dissipates the energy of the absorbed radar. In the patent filing, LM made note on F-117's stealth problem and solution for it. LM's year 2010 stealth fiber material patent is effective from 0.1 MHz to 60 Ghz which is included all VHF, L-band, S-Band, X-band, Ku-band P-Band – 30-100 cm (1-0.3 GHz) L-Band – 15-30 cm (2-1 GHz) S-Band – 8-15 cm (4-2 GHz) C-Band – 4-8 cm (8-4 GHz) X-Band – 2.5-4 cm (12-8 GHz) K-Band – Ku: 1.7-2.5 cm (18-12 GHz); Ka-Band: 0.75-1.2 cm (40-27 GHz). F-117A was downed with VHF based radar. Lockheed Martin reveals F-35 to feature nanocomposite structures (ie. CNT) http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/lockheed-martin-reveals-f-35-to-feature-nanocomposite-357223/ Lockheed Martin has revealed the F-35 Lightning II will be the first mass-produced aircraft to integrate structural nanocomposites in non-load bearing airframe components. A thermoset epoxy reinforced by carbon nanotubes will replace carbon fibre as the material used to produce F-35 wingtip fairings beginning with low rate initial production (LRIP)-4 aircraft, said Travis Earles, a manager for corporate nanotechnology initiatives. Meanwhile, the same carbon nanotube reinforced polymer (CNRP) material is being considered to replace about 100 components made with other composites or metals throughout the F-35's airframe, he said. The shift to CNRP as an airframe material has been anticipated ever since carbon nanotubes were discovered in 1991. It is widely considered one of the strongest materials ever invented - several times stronger than carbon fibre reinforced plastic (CFRP), yet lighter by about 25-30%.
    1
  14569. 1
  14570. 1
  14571. 1
  14572. 1
  14573. 1
  14574. 1
  14575. 1
  14576. 1
  14577. 1
  14578. 1
  14579. 1
  14580. 1
  14581. 1
  14582. 1
  14583. 1
  14584. 1
  14585. 1
  14586. 1
  14587. 1
  14588. 1
  14589. 1
  14590. 1
  14591. 1
  14592. 1
  14593. 1
  14594. 1
  14595. 1
  14596. 1
  14597. 1
  14598. 1
  14599. 1
  14600.  @xyz-hj6ul  Production F-22A has extra internal stealth material foam, hence stealth is not just on the surface. YF-22's empty weight is lighter than the production F-22A. ----- Applied material science improvements with F-35 Lot 4 Lockheed Martin Corporation's year 2010 stealth fiber material patent via Applied NanoStructured Solutions LLC (ANS), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation. Patent number: US20100271253 SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In some aspects, embodiments disclosed herein relate to a radar absorbing composite that includes a (CNT)-infused fiber material disposed in at least a portion of a matrix material. The composite is capable of absorbing radar in a frequency range from between about 0.10 Megahertz to about 60 Gigahertz. The CNT-infused fiber material forms a first layer that reduces radar reflectance and a second layer that dissipates the energy of the absorbed radar. -- Lockheed Martin reveals F-35 Lot 4 to feature nanocomposite structures via flightglobal's lockheed-martin-reveals-f-35-to-feature-nanocomposite-357223 Lockheed Martin has revealed the F-35 Lightning II will be the first mass-produced aircraft to integrate structural nanocomposites (CNT) in non-load bearing airframe components. A thermoset epoxy reinforced by carbon nanotubes will replace carbon fibre as the material used to produce F-35 wingtip fairings beginning with low rate initial production (LRIP)-4 aircraft, said Travis Earles, a manager for corporate nanotechnology initiatives. Meanwhile, the same carbon nanotube reinforced polymer (CNRP) material is being considered to replace about 100 components made with other composites or metals throughout the F-35's airframe, he said. The shift to CNRP as an airframe material has been anticipated ever since carbon nanotubes were discovered in 1991. It is widely considered one of the strongest materials ever invented - several times stronger than carbon fibre reinforced plastic (CFRP), yet lighter by about 25-30%. ----- F-35 doesn't need F-22's stealth material foam.
    1
  14601. 1
  14602. 1
  14603. 1
  14604. 1
  14605. 1
  14606. 1
  14607. 1
  14608. 1
  14609. 1
  14610. 1
  14611. 1
  14612. 1
  14613. 1
  14614. 1
  14615. 1
  14616. 1
  14617. 1
  14618. 1
  14619. 1
  14620. 1
  14621. 1
  14622. 1
  14623. 1
  14624. 1
  14625. 1
  14626. 1
  14627. 1
  14628. 1
  14629. 1
  14630. 1
  14631. 1
  14632. 1
  14633. 1
  14634. 1
  14635. 1
  14636. 1
  14637. 1
  14638. 1
  14639. 1
  14640. 1
  14641. 1
  14642. 1
  14643. 1
  14644. 1
  14645. 1
  14646. 1
  14647. 1
  14648. 1
  14649. 1
  14650. 1
  14651. 1
  14652. 1
  14653. 1
  14654. 1
  14655. 1
  14656. 1
  14657. 1
  14658. 1
  14659. 1
  14660. 1
  14661. 1
  14662. 1
  14663. 1
  14664. 1
  14665. 1
  14666. 1
  14667. 1
  14668. 1
  14669. 1
  14670. 1
  14671. 1
  14672. 1
  14673. 1
  14674. 1
  14675. 1
  14676. 1
  14677. 1
  14678. 1
  14679. 1
  14680. 1
  14681. 1
  14682. 1
  14683. 1
  14684. 1
  14685. 1
  14686. 1
  14687. 1
  14688. 1
  14689.  @metrotrujillo  Your far-leftist has Allah. 6 February 2010 From WSWS Negotiations with NUMMI have been strung out by the UAW demand that the maximum severance package be increased to more than $60,000. This would benefit only a handful of workers and, of course, union officers. Union executives are also demanding a $72 million contribution from NUMMI to a health insurance program controlled by the UAW. “Most of the people working at the plant won’t even be eligible for it,” one worker told a reporter. “It’s mainly for the UAW as a whole rather than for the local.” Local 2244 President Sergio Santos declared that if NUMMI does not meet the bureaucracy’s demands for cash, it “would be a slap in the face to American workers.” The UAW has in fact done nothing to keep the plant open. In interviews, workers derided a local UAW petition drive, noting that while it was being circulated, machinery was being removed from the plant. The NUMMI closure will lead directly to 1,400 more layoffs in the local parts industry, and indirectly to thousands more. This is in California, where the unemployment rate is already at 12.4 percent and where vital social services have been scaled back due to the worst of the nation’s state budget crises. NUMMI’s suppliers have in recent days announced their own major layoffs. Johnson Controls has said it will close its Livermore plant, resulting in 321 layoffs, with 240 of these coming in late March, timed to coincide with the closure of NUMMI. In addition to the 4,700 jobs lost at NUMMI, Fremont will see an additional 314 parts and supply jobs vanish. The city of Hayward will lose 387 jobs after the closure of Injex Industries. Modesto will lose 186 jobs with the shutdown of Trim Master, Inc. Stockton will suffer 154 job losses after Kyoho Manufacturing closes, and Merced will lose 53 jobs after Arvin Sango shuts its doors.
    1
  14690. 1
  14691. 1
  14692. 1
  14693. 1
  14694. 1
  14695. 1
  14696. 1
  14697. 1
  14698. 1
  14699. 1
  14700. 1
  14701. 1
  14702. 1
  14703. 1
  14704. 1
  14705. 1
  14706. 1
  14707. 1
  14708. 1
  14709. 1
  14710. 1
  14711. 1
  14712. 1
  14713. 1
  14714. 1
  14715. 1
  14716. 1
  14717. 1
  14718. 1
  14719. 1
  14720. 1
  14721. 1
  14722. 1
  14723. 1
  14724. 1
  14725. 1
  14726. 1
  14727. 1
  14728. 1
  14729. 1
  14730. 1
  14731. 1
  14732. 1
  14733. 1
  14734. 1
  14735. 1
  14736. 1
  14737. 1
  14738. 1
  14739. 1
  14740. 1
  14741. 1
  14742. 1
  14743. 1
  14744. 1
  14745. 1
  14746. 1
  14747. 1
  14748. 1
  14749. 1
  14750. 1
  14751. @Anonymous Bosch The Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". In your argument's summary, the USSR-supported regime change intervention is okay while the US intervention is bad. Your argument is hypocritical.
    1
  14752. 1
  14753. 1
  14754. 1
  14755. 1
  14756. 1
  14757. 1
  14758. 1
  14759. 1
  14760. 1
  14761. 1
  14762. 1
  14763. 1
  14764. 1
  14765. 1
  14766. 1
  14767. 1
  14768. 1
  14769. 1
  14770. 1
  14771. 1
  14772. 1
  14773. 1
  14774. 1
  14775. 1
  14776. 1
  14777. 1
  14778. 1
  14779. 1
  14780. 1
  14781. 1
  14782. 1
  14783. 1
  14784. 1
  14785.  @StraightShooter71  Prior to 2014 2007: Russian President Vladimir Putin visits Sydney (Australia) for APEC and agrees to 'Cooperation in the Use of Nuclear Energy for Peaceful Purposes' deal with then prime minister John Howard (Liberal-National Coalition). 2008: Australian joint parliamentary committee on treaties objects after Russia invades Georgia. 2010: Then prime minister Julia Gillard (Australian Labor party) endorses Nuclear Cooperation Agreement with Russia's president Dmitry Medvedev. 2012: Australian uranium shipment sent to St Petersburg as part of a trial. 2014: Then prime minister Tony Abbott (Liberal-National Coalition) bans uranium exports after Russian-back separatists in eastern Ukraine shot down Malaysia Airlines flight MH17. ----- 2007 The agreement between Australia and Russia was titled, 'Cooperation in the Use of Nuclear Energy for Peaceful Purposes' and the Labor Opposition supported at it the time with an election looming. While Australia is opposed to domestic nuclear energy, it hailed the prospect of 'assisting Russia to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and atmospheric pollution through the use of nuclear power, especially given Russia's high projected growth in electricity demand'. 'Russia is seeking secure, long-term sources of uranium to satisfy its expanding nuclear energy program,' the deal said. 'There is strong commercial interest in the long term amongst Australian uranium producers in supplying uranium to Russia. 'Russia is proposing at least a two-fold increase in its nuclear energy output by 2020.' 2010 Australia and Russia in November 2010 signed a Nuclear Cooperation Agreement with then prime minister Julia Gillard and president Dmitry Medvedev witnessing the deal in Seoul. 'In addition, it enabled Australian and Russian government officials to ensure that there was a common understanding of the administrative arrangements underpinning the nuclear cooperation agreement.' 2014 In September 2014, then prime minister Tony Abbott banned uranium exports to Russia after Russian-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine shot down Malaysia Airlines flight MH17, killing 298 people including 38 Australians. Australia's and Russia's relationship was warm until MH17.
    1
  14786. 1
  14787. 1
  14788. 1
  14789. 1
  14790. 1
  14791. 1
  14792. 1
  14793. 1
  14794. 1
  14795. 1
  14796. 1
  14797. 1
  14798. 1
  14799. 1
  14800. 1
  14801. 1
  14802. 1
  14803. 1
  14804. 1
  14805. 1
  14806. 1
  14807. 1
  14808.  @vjacheslav_mihajlovich  Soviet Union (1922–1991) 1924 August Uprising, Consolidation of Soviet rule in Georgian SSR 1924 Tatarbunary Uprising, Crushing of the Soviet-inspired rebellion. 1925–1926 Urtatagai conflict, 1929 Sino-Soviet conflict, USSR defeats China 1929 Red Army intervention in Afghanistan, USSR defeated. 1930 Red Army intervention in Afghanistan (1930), USSR defeats Basmachi. 1932–1941 Soviet–Japanese border conflicts, USSR defeats Imperial Japan. 1936–1939 Spanish Civil War, USSR-backed proxy has been defeated. 1937 Islamic Rebellion in Xinjiang, USSR's backed proxy defeats China. 1939 Invasion of Poland (Part of World War II), triggering WW2. Division of Polish territory between Third Reich, Soviet Union and Slovakia 1939–1940 Winter War (Part of World War II), USSR defeats Finland. 1940 Occupation of the Baltic states(Part of World War II), Occupation of the Baltic states by the Red Army 1940 Soviet occupation of Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina(Part of World War II), Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina annexed to the USSR, creation of the Moldovan SSR. 1944–1956 Guerrilla war in the Baltic states, USSR defeats Ukrainian Insurgent Army 1945 Soviet–Japanese War(Part of World War II), USSR defeats Imperial Japan. Karafuto Prefecture is annexed by the Soviet Union and incorporated into Sakhalin Oblast. Kuril Islands annexed to the Soviet Union 1953 East German Uprising, Soviet Union crushed East German demonstrators. 1968 Invasion of Czechoslovakia, Soviet military presence in Czechoslovakia until 1991. 1969 Zhenbao Island Incidentm, USSR defeats China. 1974–1991 Eritrean War of Independence, USSR's proxy defeated. 1975–1991 Angolan Civil War, Independence of Namibia 1977–1978 Ethio-Somali War. Somalia broke all ties with Soviet Union. 1979–1989 Soviet–Afghan War, Failed Soviet attempt to quell Afghan Mujahedeen insurgency Russian Federation (1991-present) 1991–1993 Georgian Civil War, Zviadist revolt crushed. 1991–1993 War in Abkhazia, Russian-backed Abkhazia gained de facto independence from Georgia. 1992 Transnistria War, Russian- Transnistria gained de facto independence from Moldova. 1992 East Prigorodny Conflict, Expulsion of ethnic Ingush from Prigorodny by Ossetian militia 2008 Russo-Georgian War, Expansion of Russain backed Abkhazia and South Ossetia at the expense of Georgia. 2014–present Russo-Ukrainian War, Russian annexation of Crimea 2018–present Central African Republic Civil War, Ongoing.
    1
  14809. 1
  14810. 1
  14811. 1
  14812. 1
  14813. 1
  14814. 1
  14815. 1
  14816. 1
  14817. 1
  14818. 1
  14819. 1
  14820. 1
  14821. 1
  14822. 1
  14823. 1
  14824. 1
  14825. 1
  14826. 1
  14827. 1
  14828. 1
  14829. 1
  14830. 1
  14831. 1
  14832. 1
  14833. @David Lockett Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country".[8] You're a hypocrite.
    1
  14834. 1
  14835. 1
  14836. 1
  14837. 1
  14838. 1
  14839. 1
  14840. 1
  14841. 1
  14842. 1
  14843. 1
  14844. 1
  14845. 1
  14846. 1
  14847. 1
  14848. 1
  14849. 1
  14850. 1
  14851. 1
  14852. 1
  14853. 1
  14854. 1
  14855. 1
  14856. 1
  14857. 1
  14858. 1
  14859. 1
  14860. 1
  14861. 1
  14862. 1
  14863. 1
  14864. 1
  14865. 1
  14866. 1
  14867. 1
  14868. 1
  14869. 1
  14870. 1
  14871. 1
  14872. 1
  14873.  @ianlouden7939  The study was carried out in collaboration between French news website Disclose, researchers from Princeton University and British firm Interprt. France concealed the true impact of its nuclear tests in the Pacific from the 1960s to the 1990s, a study has said. Researchers used declassified French military documents, calculations and testimonies to reconstruct the impact of a number of the tests. They estimated that around 110,000 people in French Polynesia were affected by the radioactive fallout. The number represented "almost the entire" population at the time, the researchers found. French Polynesia, a French territory made up of hundreds of islands and atolls including Tahiti, was the site of dozens of nuclear tests over 30 years. Over the course of two years, researchers analysed around 2,000 documents released by the French military and recreated the impact of "the most contaminating" of France's nuclear tests carried out between 1966 and 1974. The 41st test took place over Mururoa Atoll on 17 July 1974, when the atomic cloud took a different trajectory than planned. Some 42 hours after the test codenamed Centaur, "the inhabitants of Tahiti and the surrounding islands of the Windward group were subjected to significant amounts of ionising radiation", the report says. The area was home to 110,000 people and Tahiti's main city, Papeete, alone had a population of 80,000. According to the investigation, the resulting radiation from the French tests was between two and 10 times higher than estimates given by France's Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) in a 2006 report. One reason, according to the findings, is that the CEA "did not always take into account the drinking of contaminated rainwater" when calculating the dose of radiation individuals were likely to have been exposed to. Catherine Serda, who was a child at the time of the tests, told France Inter radio that eight members of her family contracted cancer. "This is not normal. Why do we have so much cancer there?" The CEA study was used as the basis for determining whether people were eligible for compensation from the French government. The head of France's nuclear victims compensation committee, Alain Chrisnacht, told French media that the fallout over the Tahiti area had already been documented and a large number of requests for compensation had been agreed. The report, however, said only 63 Polynesian civilians had received compensation so far. ---- France can f_ckoff.
    1
  14874. 1
  14875. 1
  14876. 1
  14877. 1
  14878. 1
  14879. 1
  14880. 1
  14881. 1
  14882. 1
  14883. 1
  14884. 1
  14885. 1
  14886. 1
  14887. 1
  14888. 1
  14889. 1
  14890. 1
  14891.  @jonpetter8921  >The US want to be world police and cash on their jets and tanks. You can't handle the truth when "old world" imperial powers like Russia and China still plays the same "old world" geopolitics. Ukraine vs Russia is the echo of the past Kyiv vs Grand Duchy of the Moscow Slavic leadership wars. ----- The Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: Shíquán Wǔgōng) were a series of military campaigns launched by the Qing dynasty of China in the mid–late 18th century during the reign of the Qianlong Emperor (r. 1735–1796). They included three to enlarge the area of Qing control in Inner Asia: two against the Dzungars (1755–1757) and the "pacification" of Xinjiang (1758–1759). The other seven campaigns were more in the nature of police actions on frontiers already established: two wars to suppress the Gyalrong of Jinchuan, Sichuan, another to suppress the Taiwanese Aboriginals (Austronesian, 1787–88), and four expeditions abroad against the Burmese (1765–1769), the Vietnamese (partly Austronesian, 1788–1789), and the Gurkhas on the border between Tibet and Nepal (1790–1792), with the last counting as two. President Xi's argument is based on historical Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns. Territorial disputes around Xi's China are based on Imperial China's Ten Great Campaigns. On the eve of the 1894 Sino-Japanese War, about 45 percent of the island was administered under the Manchus Qing administration (Imperial China) while the remaining was populated by Taiwanese aborigines. During the 4th Sino-Burmese Wars starting in 1768, Imperial China invaded the Kingdom of Burma. Burma hired European musketeers and gunners, hence Burma allied itself with the rising French Empire against Imperial China's invasion. Imperial China's imperialist conquest led to kinetic engagement with other powers. At the lowest point in the Philippines and the US relationship, the Philippines lost territory to China. Feelings are useless without firepower to back them. China's action on Mischief Reef started around 1995, shortly after the US navy left Clark airbase in Subic. Han Chinese imperialist has been wreaking Austronesian peoples before the US being a superpower. China wants the US out so that China can execute its historical Ten Great Campaigns! Russia wants the US out so Russia can execute its historical Slavic wars against recalcitrant Slavic states e.g. Poland, and Ukraine.
    1
  14892. 1
  14893. 1
  14894. 1
  14895. 1
  14896. 1
  14897. 1
  14898.  @galu060  US government deficit spending is backed by massive pension funds. From GPAS__2021 pdf Pension (mandated nanny state saving funds) vs GDP ratio for 2021 Five Eyes/Five Passport Group, Australia, $2,333 billion, 174.8% (CPTPP member, Nordic model), Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (CPTPP member, Nordic model) United Kingdom, $3,564 billion, 135.1% (near CPTPP member, Nordic model) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (I don't have data for NZ) Notice the Five Eyes group has similar pension assets to GDP ratio results Large-scale mandated savings funds enable the government to issue government bonds and large-scale bond buyer markets! EU Finland, $279 billion, 104.3% (Nordic model) France, $166 billion, 6.5% Germany, $548 billion, 14.5% Italy, $231 billion, 12.5% (PIIGS) Netherlands, $1,900 billion, 214.4%, (Nordic model) Ireland, $197 billion, 49.4% (PIIGS) Spain, $44 billion, 3.6% (PIIGS) UK exit from the EU has weakened state-mandated savings for the EU. France's dream to be a financial powerhouse is LOL. Non-EU, Europe Switzerland, $1,163 billion, 164.3% (Nordic model) North America Mexico, $259 billion, 24.9% (USMCA, CPTPP member) Canada, $3,080 billion, 192.5% (USMCA, CPTPP member, Nordic model) United States, $32,567 billion, 156.5% (USMCA) South America Brazil, $195 billion,14.3% Chile, $243 billion, 99.2% (CPTPP member) East Asia, South East Asia China, $285 billion, 1.9% Hong Kong, $199 billion, 58.3% Japan, $3,613 billion, 73.6% (CPTPP member) South Korea, $968 billion, 61.0% Malaysia, $279 billion, 83.0% (CPTPP member) South-Central Asia India, $184 billion, 7.1% CPTPP members usually have good state-mandated savings policies.
    1
  14899. 1
  14900. 1
  14901. 1
  14902. 1
  14903. 1
  14904. 1
  14905. 1
  14906. 1
  14907. 1
  14908. 1
  14909. 1
  14910. 1
  14911. 1
  14912. 1
  14913. 1
  14914. 1
  14915. 1
  14916. 1
  14917. 1
  14918. 1
  14919. 1
  14920. 1
  14921. 1
  14922. 1
  14923. 1
  14924. 1
  14925. 1
  14926. 1
  14927. 1
  14928. 1
  14929. 1
  14930. 1
  14931. 1
  14932. Chile example, USSR has supported its Cuban proxy that in turn supported Marxist Salvador Allende. You're a hypocrite. Marxist Salvador Allende clashed with the right-wing parties that controlled Congress and with the judiciary. On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état. Marxist Salvador Allende's presidential branch effectively declared war on the judiciary and right-wing majority governed Congress branches. During the 1970 Chilean presidential election, both the United States and the Soviet Union poured money into this election through their intelligence agencies and other sources. 💰KGB money was more precisely targeted. Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, and an additional personal subsidy of $50,000 directly to Allende.[8] It is believed that help from KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country".[8] You're a hypocrite.
    1
  14933. 1
  14934. 1
  14935. 1
  14936. 1
  14937. 1
  14938. 1
  14939. 1
  14940. 1
  14941. That's OPEC. UK's North Sea oil exports are in pound sterling. The Canadian dollar is increasingly viewed as a petrocurrency in the 21st Century. . As their oil sands deposits have been increasingly exploited and sold on the international market, movements of the Canadian dollar have become increasingly correlated with the price of oil. For example, the exchange rate of Canadian dollars for Japanese yen (99% of Japan's oil is imported) is 85% correlated with crude prices. As long as oil exports remain a strong component of Canada’s exports, oil prices will influence the value of the Canadian dollar. Why has the Canadian dollar become a petrocurrency? During the 1980s and 1990s, energy’s share in trade hovered around the five per cent mark. That changed as we entered the 21st century. By 2014, energy’s share had nearly tripled to about 15 per cent. This is even more pronounced when one only looks at exports, where that share has reached 25 per cent by 2014. That is what has fundamentally shifted and can explain why oil prices matter a whole lot more than they did a decade or two earlier. Will the Canadian dollar remain a petrocurrency? As long as oil exports remain a strong component of Canada’s exports, oil prices will influence the value of the Canadian dollar. If the share of oil and gas exports increases further, the link between oil prices and the exchange rate may become even stronger. Both Canada and the United Kingdom have GDPs larger than Russia's and Saudi Arabia's. ---- In August 2018, Venezuela joined the group of countries that allow their oil to be purchased in currencies other than US Dollars, thus allowing purchases in Euros, Yuan(Petroyuan) and other directly convertible currencies. Unlike the U.S. dollar, the renminbi is not a freely convertible currency; its exchange rate against other currencies including the U.S. dollar continues to be managed by China's central bank. Crude export proceeds in Chinese currency cannot be invested outside China as widely as USD, and can only be invested inside China at the discretion of the Chinese government.
    1
  14942. 1
  14943. 1
  14944. 1
  14945. 1
  14946. 1
  14947. 1
  14948. 1
  14949. 1
  14950.  @tonyatgoogle6076  https://www.law.columbia.edu/node/5344/beyond-ownership-state-capitalism-and-chinese-firm-curtis-j-milhaupt-and-wentong-zheng For some mixed-ownership firms, classifying their ownership type is difficult also because of the way they are managed. A prominent example is ZTE Corporation (ZTE), China’s second largest telecommunication equipment manufacturer and the subject of a U.S. House Committee investigation in 2012. ZTE’s shares are listed on both the Shenzhen and Hong Kong Stock Exchanges. ZTE’s largest shareholder is ZTE Holdings, which owns 30.76% of ZTE’s shares (see Fig. 1).[9] Under both Chinese and Hong Kong law, 30% is the point at which a shareholder is considered to have acquired a large enough stake to trigger a mandatory tender offer requirement. The shares of ZTE Holdings, in turn, are held by Xi’an Microelectronics (34%), Aerospace Guangyu (17%), and Zhongxing WXT (49%). Xi’an Micro Electronics and Aerospace Guangyu are both SOEs. State-owned entities, therefore, control 51% of ZTE Holdings. https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/business-spectator/how-private-is-private-in-china-/news-story/d1496a69b87fdc6a7682cf91c0ae906a One other point is that Chinese private companies are very sensitive to popular nationalistic sentiment on issues – often stirred up by the authorities – and in some cases may also genuinely share the same views as Beijing. It was revealing, for example, how many of China’s leading ‘private’ technology companies, Baidu and Tencent, late last year took a very public stance in favour of China’s ownership of the contested Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands. Clearly leading Chinese private hi-tech companies are not averse to taking actions in support of the stance of Beijing that go beyond pure commercial decision-making.
    1
  14951. 1
  14952. 1
  14953. 1
  14954. 1
  14955. 1
  14956. 1
  14957. 1
  14958. 1
  14959. 1
  14960. 1
  14961. 1
  14962. 1
  14963. 1
  14964. 1
  14965. 1
  14966. 1
  14967. 1
  14968. 1
  14969. 1
  14970. 1
  14971. 1
  14972. 1
  14973. 1
  14974. 1
  14975. 1
  14976. 1
  14977. 1
  14978. 1
  14979. 1
  14980. 1
  14981. 1
  14982. 1
  14983. 1
  14984. 1
  14985. 1
  14986. 1
  14987. 1
  14988. 1
  14989. 1
  14990. 1
  14991. 1
  14992. 1
  14993. 1
  14994. 1
  14995. 1
  14996. 1
  14997. 1
  14998. 1
  14999. 1
  15000. 1
  15001. 1
  15002. 1
  15003. 1
  15004. 1
  15005. 1
  15006. 1
  15007. 1
  15008. 1
  15009. 1
  15010. 1
  15011. 1
  15012. 1
  15013. 1
  15014. 1
  15015. 1
  15016. 1
  15017. 1
  15018. 1
  15019. 1
  15020. 1
  15021. 1
  15022. 1
  15023. 1
  15024. 1
  15025. 1
  15026. 1
  15027. 1
  15028. 1
  15029. 1
  15030. 1
  15031. 1
  15032. 1
  15033. 1
  15034. 1
  15035. 1
  15036. 1
  15037. 1
  15038. 1
  15039. 1
  15040. 1
  15041. 1
  15042. 1
  15043. 1
  15044.  @leighmoom5277  Your "Moratorium means suspension, not cancellation." argument is a red herring. https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/covid-19-genetic-network-analysis-provides-snapshot-of-pandemic-origins Study charts the 'incipient supernova' of COVID-19 through genetic mutations as it spread from China and Asia to Australia, Europe and North America Versions of ‘A’ were seen in Chinese individuals, and Americans reported to have lived in Wuhan, and mutated versions of ‘A’ were found in patients from the USA and Australia. Wuhan’s major virus type, ‘B’, was prevalent in patients from across East Asia. However, the variant didn’t travel much beyond the region without further mutations – implying a 'founder event' in Wuhan, or 'resistance' against this type of COVID-19 outside East Asia, say researchers. From https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2020/04/07/2004999117 has https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/early/2020/04/07/2004999117/F1.large.jpg Fig. 1. Phylogenetic network of 160 SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Node A is the root cluster obtained with the bat (R. affinis) coronavirus isolate BatCoVRaTG13 from Yunnan Province. Circle areas are proportional to the number of taxa, and each notch on the links represents a mutated nucleotide position. The sequence range under consideration is 56 to 29,797, with nucleotide position (np) numbering according to the Wuhan 1 reference sequence (8). The median-joining network algorithm (2) and the Steiner algorithm (9) were used, both implemented in the software package Network5011CS (https://www.fluxus-engineering.com/), with the parameter epsilon set to zero, generating this network containing 288 most-parsimonious trees of length 229 mutations. The reticulations are mainly caused by recurrent mutations at np11083. The 161 taxa (160 human viruses and one bat virus) yield 101 distinct genomic sequences. The phylogenetic diagram is available for detailed scrutiny in A0 poster format (SI Appendix, Fig. S5) and in the free Network download files.
    1
  15045. 1
  15046. 1
  15047. 1
  15048. 1
  15049. 1
  15050. 1
  15051. 1
  15052. 1
  15053. 1
  15054. 1
  15055. 1
  15056. 1
  15057. 1
  15058. 1
  15059. 1
  15060. 1
  15061. 1
  15062. 1
  15063.  @comedyandeducationtv3126  United States Congress's 1982 Six Assurances for Taiwan 1. The United States has not agreed to set a date for ending arms sales to Taiwan. 2. The United States has not agreed to consult with the PRC on arms sales to Taiwan. 3. The United States will not play mediation role between Taipei and Beijing. 4. The United States has not agreed to revise the Taiwan Relations Act. 5. The United States has not altered its position regarding sovereignty over Taiwan. 6. The United States will not exert pressure on Taiwan to enter into negotiations with the PRC. On May 19, 2016, one day before Tsai Ing-wen assumed the Presidency of the Republic of China, U.S. Senators Marco Rubio (R-FL), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and Bob Menendez (D-NJ), former chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and co-chair of the Senate Taiwan Caucus, introduced a concurrent resolution reaffirming the Taiwan Relations Act and the “Six Assurances” as cornerstones of United States–Taiwan relations.[6][7][8] The Republican Party Platform of the 2016 Republican National Convention mentions the Six Assurances, stating, "We salute the people of Taiwan, with whom we share the values of democracy, human rights, a free market economy, and the rule of law. Our relations will continue to be based upon the provisions of the Taiwan Relations Act, and we affirm the Six Assurances given to Taiwan in 1982 by President Reagan. We oppose any unilateral steps by either side to alter the status quo in the Taiwan Straits on the principle that all issues regarding the island’s future must be resolved peacefully, through dialogue, and be agreeable to the people of Taiwan. If China were to violate those principles, the United States, in accord with the Taiwan Relations Act, will help Taiwan defend itself. We praise efforts by the new government in Taipei to continue constructive relations across the Taiwan Strait and call on China to reciprocate. As a loyal friend of America, Taiwan has merited our strong support, including free trade agreement status, the timely sale of defensive arms including technology to build diesel submarines, and full participation in the World Health Organization, International Civil Aviation Organization, and other multilateral institutions."[9] The Asia Reassurance Initiative Act (Pub.L. 115–409 (text) (PDF)) states that it is the policy of the U.S. to enforce commitments to Taiwan consistent with the Six Assurances.[10] As of September 2018, the Donald Trump administration "has stated that the U.S.-Taiwan relationship is also 'guided' by [the] 'Six Assurances'".[11] In November 2020 U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo stated “Taiwan has not been a part of China, and that was recognized with the work that the Reagan administration did to lay out the policies that the United States has adhered to now for three and a half decades, and done so under both administrations.” which was seen as invoking clause 5.[12] The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 reconfirmed the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) and the Six Assurances as the foundation for US-Taiwan relations.[13]
    1
  15064. 1
  15065. 1
  15066. 1
  15067. 1
  15068. 1
  15069. 1
  15070. 1
  15071. 1
  15072. 1
  15073. 1
  15074. 1
  15075. 1
  15076. 1
  15077. 1
  15078. 1
  15079. 1
  15080. 1
  15081. 1
  15082. 1
  15083. 1
  15084. 1
  15085. 1
  15086. 1
  15087. 1
  15088. 1
  15089. 1
  15090. 1
  15091. 1
  15092. 1
  15093. 1
  15094. 1
  15095. 1
  15096. 1
  15097. 1
  15098. 1
  15099. 1