Comments by "c. j. macq" (@cjmacq-vg8um) on "BREAKING: Trump-appointed judge makes most DANGEROUS ruling yet" video.

  1. wow. men making the decision that men can play in women's sports is ok with you but violating their abortion rights make you mad? that makes no sense. how about protecting the RIGHTS OF ALL WOMEN! how's that for an idea? oh my god. a "conservative" rejects the science of the abortion pill, but then you display a comment about him accepting the science of biology by calling "transgenders" delusional. THEY ARE! and as long as the fascist gay-lobby continues to claim gender-dysphorics as "normal" they are INDEED "disordered." both sides reject reality, science and women's rights. both sides call the side fascist and both sides ARE RIGHT. yes, based upon his anti-abortion extremism, this judge is fascist. but based upon the "liberal" anti-science and anti-women stance on gender dysphoia they're fascist too. you'll all bonkers; hypocritical and embracing situational ethics and double standards.
    1
  2. wow. men making the decision that men can play in women's sports is ok with you but men violating women's abortion rights make you mad? that makes no sense. how about protecting the RIGHTS OF ALL WOMEN! how's that for an idea? oh my god. a "conservative" judge rejects the science of the abortion pill, but then you display a comment about him accepting the science of biology by calling "transgenders" delusional. THEY ARE! and as long as the fascist gay-lobby continues to claim gender-dysphorics as "normal" they are INDEED "disordered." both sides reject reality, science and women's rights. both sides call the other side fascist and both sides ARE RIGHT. yes, based upon his anti-abortion extremism, this judge is fascist. but based upon the "liberal" anti-science and anti-women stance on gender dysphoia they're fascist too. you'll all bonkers; hypocritical and embracing situational ethics and double standards.
    1
  3. wow. men making the decision that men can play in women's sports is ok with you but men violating women's abortion rights make you mad? that makes no sense. how about protecting the RIGHTS OF ALL WOMEN! how's that for an idea? oh my god. a "conservative" judge rejects the science of the abortion pill, but then you display a comment about him accepting the science of biology by calling "transgenders" delusional. THEY ARE! and as long as the fascist gay-lobby continues to claim gender-dysphorics as "normal" they are INDEED "disordered." both sides reject reality, science and women's rights. both sides call the other side fascist and both sides ARE RIGHT. yes, based upon his anti-abortion extremism, this judge is fascist. but based upon the "liberal" anti-science and anti-women stance on gender dysphoia they're fascist too. you'll all bonkers; hypocritical and embracing situational ethics and double standards.
    1
  4. wow. men making the decision that men can play in women's sports is ok with you but men violating women's abortion rights make you mad? that makes no sense. how about protecting the RIGHTS OF ALL WOMEN! how's that for an idea? oh my god. a "conservative" judge rejects the science of the abortion pill, but then you display a comment about him accepting the science of biology by calling "transgenders" delusional. THEY ARE! and as long as the fascist gay-lobby continues to claim gender-dysphorics as "normal" they are INDEED "disordered." both sides reject reality, science and women's rights. both sides call the other side fascist and both sides ARE RIGHT. yes, based upon his anti-abortion extremism, this judge is fascist. but based upon the "liberal" anti-science and anti-women stance on gender dysphoia they're fascist too. you'll all bonkers; hypocritical and embracing situational ethics and double standards.
    1
  5. wow. men making the decision that men can play in women's sports is ok with you but men violating women's abortion rights make you mad? that makes no sense. how about protecting the RIGHTS OF ALL WOMEN! how's that for an idea? oh my god. a "conservative" judge rejects the science of the abortion pill, but then you display a comment about him accepting the science of biology by calling "transgenders" delusional. THEY ARE! and as long as the fascist gay-lobby continues to claim gender-dysphorics as "normal" they are INDEED "disordered." both sides reject reality, science and women's rights. both sides call the other side fascist and both sides ARE RIGHT. yes, based upon his anti-abortion extremism, this judge is fascist. but based upon the "liberal" anti-science and anti-women stance on gender dysphoia they're fascist too. you'll all bonkers; hypocritical and embracing situational ethics and double standards.
    1
  6. the term "pro-life" is a misnomer. its just some phrase they paid millions of dollars to some marketing firm to make up. a pro-lifer only cares about "life" while its still in the womb. once you're born you're on your own. both sides pay marketing firms BILLIONS to create catchy names and phrases with witch to lie to the public. "pro-life" and "transgender" are both just words made up, for a fee, by marketing firms for political purposes. both sides misrepresent themselves, reality and their true intent. that's the only way thery can get ANYONE foolish enough to support them and give them money.
    1