Comments by "c. j. macq" (@cjmacq-vg8um) on "LiveNOW from FOX" channel.

  1. 5
  2. 4
  3. 4
  4. 3
  5. 3
  6. 3
  7. 3
  8. 3
  9. 3
  10. 3
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. judges don't have to hold hearings to determin if trump's crimes are official acts which only illegally further delays trump's trials. all they need do is declare BY DEFINITION no crime can possibly be an official act. and the reverse is true - no official act can involve the commission of a crime. the logic is simple - and the ethics undeniable - the govt doesn't allow members of the govt to break its own laws and justify it as official acts. if there's already a law against it - IT CAN'T BE DEFINED AS AN OFFICIAL DUTY! no law has EVER been passed that includes an exception for govt officials to violate if they deem neceassary during the course of their official duties. murder, rape, fraud, tax cheating, violence, assault and battery, obstruction of justice, bribery, coersion, extortion, insurrection and treason CAN'T be defined as "OFFICIAL ACTS!" why have no other lawyers figured this out? lawyers aren't any smarter than anyone else. my god, look at jim jordon - HE'S A LAWYER! in fact lawyers HELPED TRUMP commit his crimes. lawyers help gangsters, CEOs and dictators commit crimes. i'm not saying my argument would hold up in all courts. it depends on the honesty of the judge. but IT IS a valid legal argument based upon valid legal logic. and if we want to protect our constitution and the american principle that no one is above the law - THIS IS THE ARGUMENT to use to countermand this ridiculous supreme court decision. REMEMBER - you heard it from me first. the one EVERYONE IGNORES and who NEVER recieves ANY CREDIT for anything.
    2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1