Comments by "c. j. macq" (@cjmacq-vg8um) on "Rudy Giuliani is a no-show in Georgia election defamation case hearing" video.

its a civil case so he's not out on bail. but the judge could still fine and/or jail him for contempt of court.
9
... i made a mistake in my post. this is a civil case and rudy's not on bail. but the judge could still fine or jail him for contempt of court.
6
... i made a mistake in my post. this is a civil case and rudy's not on bail. but the judge could still fine or jail him for contempt of court.
3
there's a way to guarantee Giuliani is present at all future hearings and court procedures. REVOKE HIS BAIL and hold him in jail like they do with all other defendents who violate the conditions of their pretrial release. "equal justice" and "equal treatment under the law" are nothing but meaningless and unrealized american slogans and platitudes. much like the constitution itself. what's the point of having laws if they only apply sporadically or selectively?
1
... i made a mistake in my post. this is a civil case and rudy's not on bail. but the judge could still fine or jail him for contempt of court.
1
there's a way to guarantee Giuliani is present at all future hearings and court procedures. REVOKE HIS BAIL and hold him in jail like they do with all other defendents who violate the conditions of their pretrial release. "equal justice" and "equal treatment under the law" are nothing but meaningless and unrealized american slogans and platitudes. much like the constitution itself. what's the point of having laws if they only apply sporadically or selectively?
1
there's a way to guarantee Giuliani is present at all future hearings and court procedures. REVOKE HIS BAIL and hold him in jail like they do with all other defendents who violate the conditions of their pretrial release. "equal justice" and "equal treatment under the law" are nothing but meaningless and unrealized american slogans and platitudes. much like the constitution itself. what's the point of having laws if they only apply sporadically or selectively?
1
there's a way to guarantee Giuliani is present at all future hearings and court procedures. REVOKE HIS BAIL and hold him in jail like they do with all other defendents who violate the conditions of their pretrial release. "equal justice" and "equal treatment under the law" are nothing but meaningless and unrealized american slogans and platitudes. much like the constitution itself. what's the point of having laws if they only apply sporadically or selectively?
1