Comments by "c. j. macq" (@cjmacq-vg8um) on "Vsauce2" channel.

  1. I always knew the zeno paradox as the racetrack paradox. since you must first cover half of any distance before you complete it and since any distance can be halved its impossible to complete any distance. but this paradox can be resolved without calculous using only logic. eventually, any distance will become small enough to complete without halving it first. it may take 10 steps to halve a distance but eventually the distance can be completed with a single step. in other words; just because a distance CAN be halved doesn't mean it MUST be halved. thanks for another thought provoking video.
    1
  2. I WIN THE BET!
    1
  3. here's mystery for you to solve. I just posted 2 comments and they BOTH completely disappeared. who wants to bet this one does too!
    1
  4. I first heard of the zeno paradox as the racetrack paradox. its impossible to reach the end of the racetrack because the distance must be halved before completion. and sense any distance can be halved, regardless of its size, the track can never be completed. the paradox can be proved false through logic WITHOUT calculous. its simple. eventually, the distance needed for completion gets small enough where it doesn't need to halved in order to complete it. for instance; 10 steps needed, 5 steps needed, 2 and a half steps needed - eventually the distance gets to where it can be overcome with a single step. in other words; just because a distance CAN be cut in half doesn't mean it MUST be cut it in half. it doesn't have to be halved at all. see how simple that was? thanks for another thought provoking video.
    1
  5. you're making a lot of assumptions here. including that the mathematical processes you chose were the correct ones and that your flawed logic is correct. just because you can devise some arbitrary mathematical formula to find the result you seek doesn't mean its the right formula. there's countless formulas that've been wrong. disproven by, YOU GUESSED IT, another mathematical formula. in fact science is so skewed and corrupted by "math" they'll except mathematical conclusions even OVER observationally verifiable empirical evidence. science isn't science anymore. its a religion. its dogmatic and authoritative and full of fairytales, myths and miscalculations. and, technologically speaking, its leading us straight to the police-state. there ARE honorable scientists who are against this police-state. why don't we listen to them, LIKE I DO, instead of the corporate technocrats who are addicting us, enslaving us and making TOTALLY dependent on their invasive and over priced products?
    1
  6.  @BobbyLove_pgLang  ... do you? what a silly question.
    1
  7.  @markenangel1813  ... as i pointed out in my comment, there's no logic in this video. its called convolution. they're making up arguments to support their pre-determined conclusion. of course its highly unlikely any 2 people out of 20 would have the same birthday. i swear, people will just fall for anything. how did humanity become so gullible?
    1
  8.  @maldto.1266  ... ya, right. don't bother. your gibberish isn't worth my time.
    1