Comments by "Dima S" (@dimas3829) on "Whatifalthist" channel.

  1. 6
  2. 4
  3. 3
  4. 3
  5. Pay close attention at Mongols attack routes - the Russia wouldn't suffer from them with strong Byzantium. Furthermore, "Russian vikings" attacked Byzantium.. to get it' culture, religion and technologies. There would be VERY high possibility for Russia to force itself to become integral part of Byzantium cause Russia LOV ED (with it's yandere love) what it got from it to the very heart. In our timeline it took quiet a long time for Russia to unwillingly somewhat (Moscow is the "Third Rome" as they say) separate itself (there are still folks who worship God in Greek's rituals, not the modern Russian ones) as a country on it's own even after total collapse of ERE, but if it wouldn't collapse.. I could totally imagine somewhat strange "alliance" when ERE is slowly conquering Africa and southern Asia glancing on a north with quite puzzled and unsure opinion while Mother Russia conquers northern Asia while fapping to glorious ERE and sending constant gifts to it's master who really don't know what to think about the situation Russians basically forced it into. It could then develop into the same two headed eagle - when Byzantium would be more concerned about Europe and ecome wetern roman empire and russia would be more concerned about eat and become eastern roman empire. the new ERE would totally help f there would be any sort of social|\political\economial problem in new WRE while new WRE would eventually consider new ERE.. superior? Anyway, if the industrialization would occur and bring the local uprisings with anarchic-terrorists like it did in our timeline the new ERE would eventually annex the new WRE and everyone would be happy.
    3
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. lol. What if I say to you that there was 2 revolutions? The first one was against the indecisive Tsar, the second one was against the indecisive government that didn't end the war with Germans? The Civil war started cause of lots of reasons and one of them was rise of nationalism in states of Empire. Ukranians killed Polish and Russians, Polish killed Russian and Ukranians, Finns killed Russians, all while Reds (commies), Whites (Russian nationalist backed by intervention of other countries), anarchists and Greens (local warlords, criminals and corrupt officials) killed each other for the control of those part of the country which weren't affected by minorities' nationalism. There were two major concentration camps on Whites side - the first one was the Japanese one at the Vladivostok (far East), the second one was British one at the North (http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-41271418). Your ignorance in that subject while trying to blame soviets on all of it disgusts me. Secondly, oh, yeah, famines of the Ukraine, guess if was fucking perfect in tsarists times there, eh? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_famine_of_1891%E2%80%9392) You fucking illiterate scum, who don't know what he is talking about. Man-fucking-made, yeaaah. It's not like the fucking region is infamous for it's catastrophic famines and the Soviet one was the last one cause they enacted measures to prevent it from happening again. Trotsky said those words that you citated FUCKING PRECISELY cause it was not fucking the first famine and Russian people experienced those things in tsarist time to the extent that it was common to them. Go educate yourself you hilly-Billy before minding other's business. Piece of fetid shit is what you are.
    1