Comments by "Dima S" (@dimas3829) on "William Spaniel" channel.

NAFO memes at their finest... while Ukraine losing decisevily land battles.
12
Great point. I'd also add that it plays it's role in the training of troops too. Many Ukrainian brigades were formed in NATO countries and went through the western training only to find out on the battlefield itself that the training tthey went through is absolutely useless and doesnt cover nor their own military doctrine, not the opposite side's. Like the infamous line "Germans taught us that if there is a minefield - we must go around it". Long story short, the best training Ukrainians could get is from veteran Ukrainians themselves, but there is a two-fold problem there. Firstly, the injured veterans are mostly discarded as useless trash (they even have troubles finding a civilian job since the ongoing rumor that they all have PTSD and could go insane at any moment) instead of being actively used as instructors. Secondly, Ukraine is extremely corrupt and money sent towards the goal of training and equipment mysteriously fade into pockets of local elites. Finally, I'd add up that Russia's reserves are not alone on their side of the conflict - they are heavily supplied by Iran and North Korea who hoarded their own warehouses in preparation to conflict with the west. (And while China isn't directly supplying Russia itself - it sends it's own artillery rounds to North Korea so such could replace the ammo they sent to Russia)
7
... by making it significantly longer? Syrian civil war started in 2011, my dude.
6
@benzippos islamiststs, not Muslims. Muslims are perfectly fine
4
@gloriousblobber9647 thanks for proving my point, lmao.
3
@9_9876 Ukraine can tell wahtever it wants, they won't reject sweet sweet corruption money like they always do.
3
@gloriousblobber9647 Ah, I see. Still, the battles were constantly fought from one place to another, it's not like there was a day without soldiers and civilians dying compared to the true ceasefire like the Korean one. Like Russia didn;t fully control the Donbas rebels, there was no full control over Syrian rebels either. Each commander was deciding what to do next, there was no central universal command on one side of the conflict to stop every engagement at once. You can compare it to Yugoslavia rebels during ww2 - they never stopped attacking Germans.
2
@Kath-nd6pj lmao, not going to infrastructure? Look at Crimea and rebuilt Mariupol - it absolutely going to infrastructure. Russian economy shaked off shackles of dependency on the west and became much healthier as a result with no sign of decrease.
2
@gloriousblobber9647 so far the Ukrainian one, since it overall took 3 years less as of now, duh. If Russia will be stuck there for more than 3 years - then sure, Syrian one was quicker.
1
@gloriousblobber9647 You sound confused. If we take that Syrian conflict started at 2011 and Ukrainian one in 2014 - they are 3 years apart. You are trying to strawmen here, putting words in my mouths as if I was arguing that the Ukrainian conflict started in 2022. I'm well aware that the mess of Ukrainian civil war had started with illegal coup that put forces and region loyal to the last legitimate president at odds with the western regions, with ensuing massacres of the former like the one in Odessa. Now, regarding the "ceasefire", there was no such a thing. There were hot and cold stage, sure, but that was due to logistics and sides preparing their troops better. Syrian civil war had lost of extremest (that would not tolerate ceasefires) participating in as well as Ukrainian one (in fact, Russian government was pretty glad that most of it's extremest went there in 2014, cause that significantly eased up situation inside of Russia with, for example, pro-monarchist groups effectively eradicating themselves in the process of fighting for Donbass) Finally, mind if I remind you that when you argue that SMO was a failure of supposed 3 days operation - you sorta omit that Ukrainian ATO was claimed to succeed in 48 hours according to Ukrainian officials in 2014 (while no Russian official confirmed 3 days timetable.. in the context of not using nukes while at it, that is) and failed even more miserably.
1
@torinnbalasar6774 Perun ignores insane corruption level of Ukraine that is way above the Russian one. In Russia corruption is actively prohibited from middle level and below that, in Ukraine corruption is on every level of administration and command. Everyone eating up the aid money like there is no tomorrow and it really pays off with lesser quality of the military than it could have been possible with direct US control.
1
@F.R.E.D.D2986 Look at their desperate conscription campaigns and ministry of defence getting new uniform for the pregnant ready. They are losing, and mostly not even land but manpower. Millions fled, millions soldiers died. WW2 was won for many reasons, not the least of which was defending good ideology against genocidal force. What ideology Ukraine has? It's more corrupt than Russia and the worst local population will get over Russia winning is changing one oligarchy for another. Ukrainian economy (what is left of it unbombed) on life support, it's logistics (more like soviet one cause corrupt cleptocrats of Ukraine didn't really bother to invest into one) annihilated by Russian strikes and it's resources are the reason why a few of European nations started to boycot it (like the shit-quaity grain that wrecks farmer markets abroad). Meanwhile, Russian economy is growing, it has plenty of resources as per usual, which it still sells abroad. It invest huge amount of money into logistics that keeps growing.
1
@yohannesaradom8656 brave Urkainaians are falling back and cowardly Russians conquer new territories, sure.
1
step 1: UK lied to Arabs that it will free such from Ottoman's rule and give them rulership over Palestine.
1
@9_9876 why crying? I quite enjoy how pathetic Ukrainian nazi state and it's supporters are.
1
@ADobbin1 ah, so it's okay for you to annex a sovereign state then. Youd' be perfeclty fine when Ukraine gets the same treatment by Russia, I assume.
1
@ADobbin1 Taiwan, for example.
1
@adamndirtyape NATO warehouses are already empty, Russia has artillery advantage and it won't change since it gone for partial mobilisation of economy and it works in its favour. Western countries made more than enough effort to help Ukraine with money and weaponry, the main problem is that Ukrainian corruption ate it all up.
1
@ShubhamMishrabro like US literally sponsoring Pol Pot, a genocidal regime which was cleansed by Vietnamese heroes just like they cleansed American and Chinese iinvaders, eh? Maybe US should start from itself and stop spreading their vile influence in the world before speaking against communism.
1
@MrCiaranm could they? What about precious oil reserves that US just can;;t refuse to not occupy?
1
@Dalvik.N you seem to confuse things. It was Ukraine that announced the need for 500k more troops to fill the gaps on the frontline... and it's clear evidence that 31k lost in 2 years is a big fucking lie that you still believe in, lmao.
1
you seem to confuse things. Assad lost Syria, not Putin. Putin cooperates perfectly fine with Kurdish forces.
1