General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Dima S
MentisWave
comments

Comments by "Dima S" (@dimas3829) on "MentisWave" channel.

soviets saved whoever they could in tat disastrous famine, unfortinatly they couldn't save everyone due to it's severeity and backstabbing of kulaks. Seen some insane people here claiming that kulaks couldn't use their accumulated wealth due to regulated economy. Clearly idiotic idea since there was still barter trade among peasants and pepole living in cities.
8
@perimarc6008 Let me answer those questions. 1) The reason to disallow farmers from leaving thteir farmlands during the time of poor harvest is so that they'd plant a new one to be so that the NEXT year would be better. Is it that hard to comprehend? 2) The reason why Stalin redistributed food from Ukrainians to other places is because USSR was a big country and everyone wanted to eat, not only Ukrainians. May be surprise to you, but all huan beings need food, not only Ukrainains. 3) Foreign aid wasn't free and Stlain made his best effort to get as much as possible with what limited resources he had at hand, for example from Persia. Futhermore, don't lie about hiding it - Fridtjof Wedel-Jarlsberg Nansen made his point in Legaue of Nations that there is famine in USSR and was quickly kicked out of it for suggesting support. The West pretty much hated communists and wanted them all to die at that point. 4) Stalin was selling grain cause a) foreign markets only accepted Soviet grain and not it's money in goods exchange b) As soon as he got to know about extent of the disaster (lied upon by Ukrainians apointed in charge of Ukraine) the sell stopped. Cope better, westoid.
7
@drbubonic4942 famine doesn't equal genocide, my braindead friend.
6
Commies - famine happened, yes, not intentional, nor new one, since the region were infamous for such. What happened in Tsarists Russia for hundreds of years was ended by the glorious USSR. Deal with it.
5
@Channel-23s Ah, yes, all those billions executed personally by Stalin. It's not like he wanted to build a state for his own and it's not like under him there were numerous gifts to those that show good reults. lmao.
5
@ryan.1990 well, burden of proof lies on the one who claims the thing first ,i.e. on you. So how exactly you imagine those "same" arguments being?
5
@ryan.1990 sure, bud, not debating about equalizing fake atrocity with real historical one too. Not a good look indeed to mix them up.
5
@turtlefungusismywaifu how do you define sucess, though? Hoe upper class opress the lower ones? - yeah, monarchism and capitalism were sucessful in that.
4
@danielturczan2485 it suffered a lot of such and you are ignorant if you think otherwise.
4
@D4rkmatter massacres such as the ones in 2014 in Odessa and Mariupol committed by Ukrainian military, and Ukrainian nationalists, eh?
4
tankes are not loan-sharks, though.
4
very much independent Poland had hunger at that time too. Many coutnries did, which were not related to USSR in any way, duh. You are just ignorant.
3
@marceelino yeah, yeah, they also fight with shovels only and use chips from stolen washing machines in their rockets, that's why they ar retreating on all fronts... wait.
3
cool story, bro. All sent into Gulags were innocent saints, and not murderors, rapists, thiefs and cannibals, sure.
3
@nox5555 thieves - not often, killers - depends on whom you killed and why. The important thing was always to get every crime punished, the death penalty wasn't often used, especially after the purges of 30s.. And eveyr citizen was essentially secret police, - you didn't need extra if you taught well regular citizens to pinpoint oddities in the behaviour of their neigbours.
3
And the simple answer is - they used to exploit they fellow men and expected to do the same in dire situations too by using barter economy and echange their excess in food with valuables from less fortunate. When they were denied that option - they opt to hide what they could and destroy the rest to artificially upscale even more the barter value of their excess. As simple as.
3
I guess you love dem loan-sharks then, cause that's exactly who kulaks were.
3
@RáiseiþMeinaÞiudaWiþrRūmōneis a famine. As simple as.
3
ah, yes, famine happening for hundred of years is the fault of communism, sure.
3
lies
2
People write only truth in letters, I got you.
2
@SHDW-nf2ki two of my relatives were sent into gulag. One due to being drunkard piece of shit, the other (evetually pardoned) for being clueless idiot that was taken advanage by kulak who shifted the blame on him. I'm still hardcore Stalinist cause the ideals of Soviet Union are worth living and dying for.
2
except absolutely opposite cause he had no nation in mind to be supreior to others. All people of Soveit Union were equals, compared to the Germany.
2
nice meme.
2
@Scornfull issues of famine would be much greater if the state wouldn't interfere into it. After all, majority of population DOES live in cities, duh.
2
@debanydoombringer1385 what are you snoking? Russians saw themselves as equal to everyone and everyone saw themselves as equals to Russians in Soviet Union. Yes, there were attempts of nationalists to upstage it... like Georgians, Dagestani, Ichkeria, Baltic, Ukrainian ones, but thankfully they were crushed. No nazism was allowed in Soviet Russia not then, not now.
2
nice one defending loan-sharks, cause that's exactly who kulaks were and how they gathered their initial wealth.
2
@jesseparrish1993 1) and they weren't Don't know what fairytales you read, but a) most of disgusting loan-sharks were lynched by mob of people they exploited in the past - long before soviet authorities came in power. b) Those executed by Soviet authorities committed crimes and were absoolutely judged in due process. 2) it WAS and it is a definition of kulak = exploiter. The word Kulak literally translates as a "fist", meaning a person that takes a hold of the village he resides in either by indebting the rest, physically crushing opposition (by himself, his family members or by hired henchmen, aka kingpin) to his despotic rule or both. 3) Famine indeed happened, there was no genocide in it occuring as it occured before that for hundreds of years and was finally ended by Soviets.
2
@Scornfull so you have zero counter-arguments, figures. Emotional response won't change the facts.
2
So he used a loophole to dodge taxation and you still consider him to be innocent? Lmao.
2
why can't capitalists go fuck off to their iwn coutnries? The South Koreans has literally depressing "dog ieats dog world" saying about your degenerative idelas that you forced on them and every single entertainment product or movie coming from South Korea has deep gripes with what you infested their country with. Also remmeber those camps that Japanese occupiers created where they abducted local girls and raped them constantly during ww2? Americans did the same thing with KOreans in Korean war, a fact showing what a filth you trully are.
2
@Brent-jj6qi sure, this one wasn't intentional, though.
2
@Scornfull Taking food from the people because others have as bad of a situation or not worse. Are you a city dweller? Imagine being cut off form any food supply, now imagine same situation but in the village, where you at least have a forest nearby to eat something of leser nutrient value. You get it now? The cold northern Soviet cities had the same torulbe as the southern warm villages, but if not for Stalin's effort - it would get much worse overall.
2
@zlbm0 It can, and those newer things can be: 1) Japan, stealing Imperial treasury (tehcnically taking it for safekeeping but they never gave it back to the surviving white movement members that fled into Australia and such) - i.e. state having less resources than previously 2) International diplomacy - i.e. everyone hating Soviets guts and refusing to trade with it with whatever but grain givrn in return 3) Kulak movement - i.e. expoiters trying to epploit situation further to their benefit like only selling their excess for other's family heirloom while hoarding the rest etc.
2
@martyr_lightsilver1833 speak for yourself, nazi. Death of people never a good thing and should be fight the best you can like soviets did, saving as many as they could.
2
@MentisWave and you still provided no evidence, thanks for confirming that you are a pathological liar then.
2
lmao, what a bullshit.
2
@StrawHat83 it's very funny when ignorant people consider some WW1 LARPer as someone important from Russian government. Girkin was part of monarchists (which aren't really on Putin's side) passionaires that came to assits an underdog that Donbass was in Ukrainian civil war. Russia viewed getting rid of extremist like himself as benefitionary for reinforcing intenral peace so the government didn't mind those people going to Donbas.. still, it never ecnouraged volonteers. In fact, they were discoraged the moment DPR attempted to recruit on the Red Square - it was too much of imposing and was quickly denied.
2
except that kulaks are the real thing you see everyday - loansharks, mobsters, despots, etc.
1
 @AJadedLizard congratulations, now try your best to get real counter-argument.
1
@pathfindersavant3988 so you see wtiches everyday? Should probably consult with the doctor then, or better yet - go to your next loanshark and kiss his boots if you like kulaks so much.
1
@AJadedLizard you are countering the fact that very evil real people need to be dealt with same with their evil practices of exploiting fellow men. Again, the simpliest example is loan-sharks. I know it's hard to think for libtard, but at least try.
1
Convention on cluster bombs was signed in 2008, my dude. Everyone was using it before. And you equalizing a war with unforutante annual events is disgusting. There was nothing new about southern Russian famine, it happened constantly for hundreds of years and Soviets were the ones who eventulaly ended it, not the ones who started it. Quit smoking coke.
1
@ what conversation? I was responding to a statement of some s nazi aologist, exposing his bullshit. The differences are night and day. Soviets treated their mentally ill, Germans exterminated such and so on.
1
yes, fuck the shark debt-owners and bottom feeders that kulaks were.
1
Did he, though? The work was published suspiciously in 2014 right when US organised a coup in Ukraine to make it into genocidal hellscape ruled by dictatorship it is today.
1
@Brent-jj6qi ah, yeah ,prviding education, electricity, drinking water and medicine for everyone opressed poor barbarians who wanted to keep living in caves. It's not liek USSR was the reason behind the whole that de-colonisation movement that set numerous coutnries free from the western opression.
1
They didn't enforce their evil regime yet at that point, though. Also, it's hilarious non point since ya know - all those nazi divisions from the occupied lands including French ones (that were more numerous than their oh so famous Resistance was).
1
kulak is a loan-shark that gets initial wealth by exploiting others, not so different from nobility parasites.
1
cause every single country that went through industrialization went through it. Ever heard of "sheep ate people" era of England? There simply weren't counter measures for lack of farmers turned into factory workers short-time wise. Hunger was inevitable for every single nation that became modern.
1
@opsuport9723 lmao, USSR delegated certain amount of autonomy to the Soviet Republics (the very reason why it collapsed into many countries, duh) and Ukrainian beurocrats do have a burden of lying to the highest authority that everything is fine to keep their asses in warm chairs... they were sent to gulag, by the way, appropriate measure for those scumbags. Stalin wasn't all-knowing God, lmao. He did lots of mistakes due to lack of education in certain spheres. For example, The filth of a pseudo-scientist Lysenko pretty much wated all genetics field in the soveit biology cause he was persuasive enough and talked Stalin into following his ideas. Don't invent things out of your ass. Stalin was harsh with his enemies, but there is a reason that he kept lots of nobility (including even some members of the royal family) alive - he was more concerned about usefullness of a person, than of his origin or character traits (hence why he igrored Beria cucking lots of married officers. By the way, it's hilarious that the cucked husbands later on invented a myth that Beria was a serial murderor and pedophile just cause he was so succesfull in pleasing their wifes with numerous gifts and fucked them while their husbands were away). He personally pardoned arund 40 thousands people on that very premise - that despite being scumbags, they were professionals in their fields of work and he couldn't afford to lose them. He would never be as wasteful to indiscrimiately kill groups of people. Hell, even depsite being at odds with Trotskyists, he abandoned his original idea of having one united state and went into dividing it into federation of semi-autonomous ones - in a form of a compromise with trotskyists.
1
@tapultanul97 They literally aren't. If anything, Russians consider Crimeans superior to other Russians cause they proved their worth by being the most patriotic part of the society. Same principle applied during Cuban missile crisis when readiness of Cubans to sacrifice themselves in nuclear holocaust of ww3 made them eternal friends to Russians.
1
@GrimMeowning boo-fucking-pooh. Poor poor descendants of slave traders (they were majority maybe in 14th century, not in recent times). How could they be treated harshly? The same group of people that were never recognized by Ukraine either, by the way. I'm descendant of a few nationalities, including Kazan Tatars and I spit in the face of Crimean Tatars - there's few cases when you are proud that you ancestors were vile pieces of shit, involved into mass whiteman and blackman slavery, pillage and burning of cities, castration of boys and mass rape of woman and they are one of such rare occasions. A person proudly telling you that he is Crimean Tatar is leagues worse than person proudly telling you that his grandad had house slaves.
1
@GrimMeowning and before you go on a rant about Crimean Tatars being original people here - they weren't. Originally the peninsula was inhabited by some no-names... that were exterminated by Greek colonists, the colonists that partially were exterminated later on by Tatars and partially integrated in Rus. Rus-sia then came and steadily conquered the region for itself, but Russians were constantly exterminated by the Ottomans and the Crimean Tatar minority held used as Turkey's puppet state and hub of slave trade. The hub that Russians eventually burnt to the ground. The surviving Crimean Tatars reluctantly were integrated but held a grudge. In the events of 2014 they committed several terrorist acts against Crimean population, not even authorities, i.e. they cut supplies of drinkable water and electricity going to the region (repeating heinous Ukrainian actions of the same direction).
1
@GrimMeowning it was, after last Ruso-Ottoman war or the one before that. Either way, the united entity of Tatar Khanate did exist in 6th century and the eventual division into different groups happened later on. Regardless, the main source of budget for Crimean Khanate was slave trade which was despicable and hated by all slav groups, not only by Russians, but by southern and western slavs too. By the 2014 Crimean Tatars were oustracized minority hated by every group and every government (except for Turkey, sure) that illegally held some Ukrianian territory. Same illegal status were kept by them when Russia took over Crimea. The ones that committed terrorist acts were jailed (pity that Russia has no death sentence for such an act), those that tried to raise race tensions or kept illegally held land - were deported. No law-abiding citizen (even by Ukrainian standards) suffered (except of one Russian ensign hit by mysterious sniper and that's it), end of story. I'm curious why you'd stand ground for the despicable proud descendants of the slave traders, though. If they had any decency -they'd pretend to be different group of Tatars instead of clinging on the past of their piece of shit ancestors.
1
@GrimMeowning Ah, sure, just like Greece has nothing to do with Roman Empire, USA with 13 colonies and Germany with Prussia. Whatever mental gymnastics you wanna employ here. Russia is direct evolution of Rus throughout the ages, though. If you wanna cry on the grave of vile bastards that pretty much enshrined their crucial role in slave-trade -you be you. Also, nice one deflecting the issue that "returning" (same way Turks "returned to Germany" I presume?) Crimean Tatars illegally grabbed some Ukrainian land and were in constant power struggle against Ukrainian authorities who don't like those pieces of shit either. And once again, they aren't original population of the Peninsula, original inhabitants were exterminated by Greek colonists.
1
@GrimMeowning except England being literal Roman Empire's territory with all it's cities built by Roman design, sure (with the border wall placed by the Legions on the same border as it is now between England and Scotland). Keep on going, though, your intentional ignorance is hilarious. The what I"m saying? WW2 was started by Japan, by the way. Inept League of Nations gave way to further aggression such as Italian in Ethiopia and only then Hitler caught the wind and decided to act too. Can agree with you on Mejlis - Russia indeed ended that autonomous form of self-governance. Novgorod;s traditions of self-governance are incompatible with big functioning state that Russia became. Ethnic Russian is oxymoron. Russian by itself is always a mixed-blood. Ethnic Georgian is a thing, ethnic Armenian is, ethnic Russian or Ukrainian - isn't. Though, few nations kept their xenophobic ways and stayed ethnically homogeneous. Ukrainians were periodically exterminated by Ottomans and collaborators of such with constant need of replacing the Russian settlers with new ones. Wait till you learn that there were dozens of Urkaines and each and every one of such served as Russian frontier, hence the name itself "Ukraine=U kraya=borderland", hence why a Russian living on Borderland was called Ukrainian, as simple as. Living on borders of your country gave way to shift of language, hence why modern Ukrianian language is a mix of Russian and Polish. By the way, I'm still waiting for your explanation why should I or anyone else care about Crimean Tatars.
1
@GrimMeowning lmao. I'd figured you'd be confused. Though you should specify what exactly among my words sounded strange to you.
1
@baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714 well, then you should dig up what her real story of getting there was instead of that invented fake shit. To be honest, two of my relatives got into Gulag: one drank too much and while at it shot and injured one of his comrades at the end of ww2, the other was too dumb to live (probably autistic) and was blamed on the crimes committed by the man in charge of the business he was working in (pardoned later on when real criminal was caught in his corruption schemes).
1
@WilhelmsRepresentative he was sent there for being piece of shit and kept writing his disgusting letters to his friends so that they would be jailed too. He was treated from testicle cancer there, by the way, but instead of Soviet (surgical) medicine - he claimed that he was healed by some magical herbs, being insane lunatic that he was.
1
@baryony gulag was a prison system, as simple as. And even if few excweptions of innocent people were there like my dumbduck grandfather whose boss made him a scapegoat on his own stealing from USSR, it was still mostly just. Your lot can do your mental gymnastics somewhere else.
1
@baryony yeah, such political criminals as terrorists, mass murderers and thiefs. There's a reason word dissident existed in soviet language and it meant a political opponent to the soviet regime that did no crimes and hence was free in his or her activities, duh. There's also a reason why soviet union eventually fallen - since those dissidents rose to be party members and destroyed the system from within.
1
@wesleytheanonymous3751 yeah,yeah, evil communistic countries. It's not like the starvation at the same time occurred on the rest of the region including very anti-communistic Poland, uhuh.
1
@diamondsteve201 That's nice whitewashing of what disgusting filth kulaks trully were. The term "kulak" can be translated as "clenched fist" and they were the ones who took control over their villages (traditionally ruled by edlers and representative of authorities) either by indebting the rest or beating such into submission, not innocent honest workers you try to portray them to be. When you destroy food while the rest of people are starving you are indeed a piece of shit, sorry, but the truth won't chenge depsite your denial of it.
1
it's all cool and shiet, but workers waged revolution CAUSE they had more control than ever (due to ww1), not to gain control.
1
@Max91019 compare it to Mariupol indeed and how beutifully Russians rebuilt the city, despite the damage it sustained. Can'tsee Ukrainians reuvilding theirs, not did they care to repair them for 30 years of "independance"
1
@mrosskne Ukrainians apparently don't know this cause they only consider their own losse sand never mention millions of Kosakzs and Russians that died too. Only Ukrainians needed food, sure.
1
more like virgin crapitalist.
1
@omegaroleplayer1022 if their farmers get crushed by pro-oligarchy eco-terrorists and cheap Ukrainian shit gets annexed into Russia? Sure, the famine will happen in EU and Russia won't give a fuck to stop it this time.
1
It was scoialist with focus on becoming communist. The economy of USSR was producing extremely well-done products for generational usage. I wasn't wasteful shithole as capitalistic economies are. The state didn't have corporations, every factory was divided from one another and the worker's unions palyed great role in operation of such. Furthermore, everyone was provided with a job suitable for your skills, a right that every capitalistic coutnries doesnt' have. In crapitalistic world you beg to get fucked by eployer to have roof above your head, in glorious Soviet Union you were provided with free housing, helatcare and education. Don't you dare to say that it was nowhere socialist. It was more socialist than modern Nordic countries.
1
@ZIEMOWITIUS nice meme. Now give an example of one. I have lots of the opposite: from the nails and perfectly 200ml glasses to the ak-47. Unbreakable, unbeatable, extremely easily repairable, cheap and long-lived. The qualities that capitalism would never go for cause consumers must keep consuming.
1
@ZIEMOWITIUS I know that it can be thrown into the dirt, out of Earth orbit, into the mud and it will still keep on firing. It was a perfect weapon to fight in a Vietnam jungles compared to overcomplicated and broken from any little inconvinience m16. It can be badly maintained for years and decades - and will still keep on shooting. Beutiful weapon. It's heavy, but can be used in melee cause it made out of wood and metal instead of light plastic. It has few working parts, that are easily replaceable and pushing it's effectiveness to it's limits. Etc. There's a reaosn why Americans fighting abroad often exchanged their shitty crapitalistic weapons to AKs.
1
@ZIEMOWITIUS and yet, Ural Ukrainians are absolutely fine, so your whole argument goes to the shitter. Ukrainians weren't targeted, stop repeating that disgusted lie invented by Urkainian nationalists.
1
Crapitalists are insane enough to suggest that only Ukrainians needed food and the rest of the coutnry suffering famine was fine to eat nothing.
1
@DjDeadpig her nazi professor has taught her to hate soviets well, I suppose.
1
@DjDeadpig You did, by enforcing your morals into the world and world's response to it was extreme jihadism that makes it their goal to destroy your evil cancer that you spread worldwide disregarding people's traditions and values.
1
@DjDeadpig Good for you, jsut rremember that your wealth is built on suffering and resources of other coutries and people instead of your own effort.
1
explain starvation in the same time in Poland and Soviet Union then. Poles pretty much hated soviets and were staunch capitalist, yet starved too. Maybe some day you'd come to realize that indeed sometimes mother nature is the source of famines.
1
@Enjgine In 1932-1933 not only Soviet Union suffered from famine that led to hunger and starvation but then independent Poland too, duh. Meaning that was natural occurrence.
1
@Enjgine it's as if so called allied countries refused to accept as payment with soviets anything but grain while Japanese sstolen royal treasury during the civil war..
1
@ yeah, yeah, yeah, British "sheep ate people" is for communism to blame. American tens millions of blacks dying out of starvation during industrialization is on communism too, as well as Benghazi gamine, famine in Poland, etc. You can live in denial all you want, but every single country that industrialized and went from the wooden huts could not afford such without moving lots of peasants form the fields to the industry and short-time that led to the lack of agricultural goods that led to artificial famines... famines that all be it natural or artificial were dealt with once and for all by the industry of chemical fertilizers. Industry that you could not afford to create without loss of population. That is a simple fact. Regarding the supposed atrocities - it's always a given when western "experts" blame every death on the communist regime be it the victim of some bandit or the bandit hanged for his crimes. Be it revolutionary worker killing fascistic rebel or be it nationalistic rebel killing some peasant family - all of it blamed on the communists, uhuh.
1
@zlbm0 situation overal was fucked for soviets and sure enough, kulaks made it only worse. Kulaks were not competent or productive, lmao. The term literally translates as "clenched fist" 0 imagine a loanshark or a mob-boss that either indebted or beten into submission his fellow men while the Civil war was ongoing and there was no authorities to clean things out. That's who kulaks were. Soviets redistributed food the best they could among each citizen, still millions of ukrainians, russians, kosaks and others died due to severity of famine and extra bad factors, sure. Are you one of those people that think that only Ukrainians needed to eat? The fuck profit get into your equation? - is that a Freudian slip of a cleptocrate? Oh, yes, noble other nations that interviened in their ex-ally territory and either chopped the heads of those who didn't bow neough like Japanese occupation forces did, or outright built death camps in Arkhangelsk for communists - like UK occupation forces together with Americans did. Such good guys couldn't possible do no harm and were absolutely in the right by denying helping starving civilians that you ourself apparently so much care about. Lmao, what a joke you are.
1
Stalin is of course at fault that Germany-controlled Ukraine ensured starvation of soviets. Quit smoking weed.
1
one is unfortunate annual events that happened for hundreds of years but Ukrainian nazis cry that their ethnicity was targeted, the other - is focused extermination of Jews.. That led for the Israel learning their lesson poorly and starting their own genocide with the same premise of Germans ("we will never let ourselves be humiliated and exploited like that time") that such experienced after ww1.
1
@JackWoolsey-w4d nah, inbreeding's on liberals like you.
1
illegally, at that. Soviet Constitution prohibited such a tranfer and Krutchev violated he core principles of the country, no wonder, the piece of shit probably killed Stalin too.
1
@ZIEMOWITIUS well, not only that. Him pardoning half of gulag prisoners lead to extreme rise of violence on soviet streets, cause those people were rightfully imprisoned. Furthermor,e he led the corruption clique that undermined equality measures to grab more power for themselves. He led the way to the CIA funded dissidents that spilled trash on Stalin's name (to reinforce his unlawful taking over - you see, Stalin had a designed sucessor - Malinkov.. nobody remembers him cause he was quickly got rid of by Kruschev's gang), but didn't consider that they'd spill shit over communism as a whole and about him too untill it was too late and fairytails of ebil communism spred. He also closed down the Stalin's programs that ecnouraged small businesses, closed down on constuction of monumental buildings (that serve to this day due to their unprecedentent quality). The braindead approach of raising corn everywhere led to the severe damage to agriculture (despite Kruschev originating from Ukraine, the breadbasket of Russia, he knew shit about anything) etc. Krushcev had 3 grades of grade school, under his belt, by the way.
1
@mantheman11 you mean nazi massacre that they pathetically tried to place on communists and failed at Nurnmber trials, being found guilty for it? Yeah, traitor Kruschev that killed Stalin has claimed it was true... still no evidence of soveits doing it, only evidence like German bullets found, duh.
1
@crazypissman6721 more like administration of elected Ukrainian authorities who decided to hide the severity to keep their asses in warm chairs. They were sent to Gulag for their crimes, though. And you can choose only one of those two events to cry about .
1
what genocide are you speaking about, NAFO-bot?
1
@EarthForces Yeah? The famine in USSR still doesn't fit that description. No exploicit group was targeted by the state. The southern regions were most affected, sure, cause they were the ones producing most food and having the least amount of cities (I mean literally less amount of cities) that could act as re-distribution centers. Still, millions of Ukrainians, Kasahs and Russians died. Also, the fifths one is regarded - transfer of children into safety is noble act of heroism.. Though, I wonder why gupsies aren't codemned for committing genocide the, but there's that.
1
@EarthForces Projecting much? Why suffering of only one particular ethnicity bother you too much? Percentage-wise the Kosahs suffered the most from that unforutante tragedy, but for some reason they don't act same way as the whiny bitches like the Ukrainian nazis that trying to rewrite the history to push their narrative.
1
@ulforcemegamon3094 farmers never told him that... as if they fucking knew it. Chinese education for peasants was non-existing before communists won.
1
@StrawHat83 he is long in Russian jail for extremism, though
1
@StrawHat83 he led a group of extremists like him, well-intentioned ones, if you will, alright. Has nothing to do with Russian govenrment, hence no medals for him, duh. Also DOnbass wouldn't have happened if not for several massacres conducted by UA forces, but there's that. People like you would absolutely debate them and will ever ask qurstions to current Ukrainian government who exactly shot protestors at Maidan square and why investigation was quickl closed off by new authorities.
1