Comments by "" (@vika0194) on "Auto Express" channel.

  1. They ruined the rear
    32
  2. M F probably not
    21
  3. I agree but fully blacking it out made it worse.
    11
  4. bmw, same boring design and horrible interior. jaguar, always unique and special. but that's me...
    9
  5. best looking and working suv ever made. the 2015 model
    9
  6. it is active but it doesn't hide inside the car like the regular wing on the normal F-type version. you can choose this SVR wing or the regular wing for the SVR
    5
  7. Rosalie Bent not really. Most prefer the old one. Just read the comments on the reviews... Then you can come back and apologise.
    5
  8. Rosalie Bent Read the comments of the reviews for example in this video and all other videos posted today on the new F-type. Very few like the new one.
    5
  9. Could have been a Kia. Nobody would notice the difference.
    5
  10. i think you should fix your grammar before trying to be smart
    4
  11. No
    4
  12. Previous looks unique and exotic. This looks like Tesla+Audi+Ford+Maserati
    4
  13. Yea but why get it now? Buy a used one in 3 years and save 50%
    4
  14. I would say it's pretty generic and basic at the front. Could be any normal car brand. The rear is just a messed up design of the previous generation.
    4
  15. stupid shifting paddles that are stationary instead of following the steering wheels movement...
    3
  16. ***** no thanks. i have a jaguar and have driven the f-type
    3
  17. Lyndon Underwood that bmw:s interior is boring and dull as a 90's car
    3
  18. ***** i personally don't like german interiors. i have a 2012 jaguar xj and think it has the best interior out there...
    3
  19. i don't like it one bit. Jaguar should never produce suv's
    3
  20. 1:36 he is sitting really low. adjust the seats!
    3
  21. Al Boran the rear design is crosseyed
    2
  22. Lock JR Because car companies must allow them to do it.
    2
  23. That's just a really weak design. Jaguar are making too many models now. Stick to high end luxury and raw sports cars
    2
  24. lol yes. Arte you telling me that F50 looked worse than F40? And that 430 was ugly?
    2
  25. Yes, i will probably have a regular cheap 4-door car at the side when i need it. but the f-type is for those days when i only need one person with me.
    2
  26. They basically did. Project 8
    2
  27. The front is acceptable. Not a huge change but it sure looks less sporty
    2
  28. Awful design. The front looks all blobbed up.
    2
  29. F-type R sound better than the SVR. The sound is too light in the SVR.
    2
  30. It’s a Porsche. That’s what sells...
    2
  31. The old one is the best
    2
  32. That would be the 2015-2017 F-type
    2
  33.  @CapnT87  Yeah okay you are talking about leasing. In my country we can only lease certain car models, usually low powered cheap cars. Only companies can lease any car. I have an F-type R coupe and bought it when it was 3.5 years old.
    2
  34. It was called 220 for a reason.... You are always wrong. I know you from back in 7th grade...
    2
  35. Thank you, no problem.
    2
  36. 5:23 mistake
    2
  37. Back needs work? Lol
    2
  38. Haha the car at 0:10 is not the same as 0:18 and you can see that by looking at the bumper or the license plate
    2
  39. F-type is produced……. XJ too. What else do you need?
    2
  40. Alan Bowers extreme rear wheel spin and loss of control
    2
  41. Alan Bowers ehmmm no. It has no traction despite traction control being on. There is a reason Jaguar cancelled production on RWD F-type’s. They didn’t manage to engineer it to handle RWD. Just because cars with higher power managed it doesn’t mean that this one should. It’s obvious you never drove an RWD V8 F-type.
    2
  42. Snakebloke cayenne is also ugly
    1
  43. doesn't even look like a car. very weird looking
    1
  44. yes, sure performance-wise it is good. But it just looks really ugly. And the price is horrible. I am sorry but this is the ugliest electric car I have ever seen.
    1
  45. Only the McLaren is desirable
    1
  46. this is how they should view cars. Not on some stupid track. Just show how the car is on normal city streets.
    1
  47. nickL7389 what if another car hits you?????????
    1
  48. nickL7389 you are too far into the future... maybe this will be possible in 2153
    1
  49. ***** yes they did, that's exactly what they said... they said it in a swedish news interview...
    1
  50. ***** they made a new statement when they showed this car in 2014.... here is their statement from 2008. translate it to english and read it by yourself. nothing beats the original source:http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/fordon_motor/bilar/article246077.ece
    1