Comments by "" (@robm8809) on "Andrew Lawrence"
channel.
-
203
-
182
-
180
-
167
-
150
-
128
-
126
-
111
-
100
-
71
-
42
-
42
-
39
-
38
-
37
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
22
-
20
-
20
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
Someone commenting here was saying that this was all immaterial to him as he was too ugly to have a partner, but the comment has somehow disappeared. He was missing the point: A few decades ago, a less attractive man who was also honest, loyal, and prepared to work for a living and supoort a family, was still seen as "a catch" by women, but now, women have been indoctrinated with different priorities. Most single women are chasing the top 10 or 15% of men, oblivious of their own shortcomings, and unwilling to lower their expectations, hence the number of likely women hitting middle age with no spouse and no kids... The architects of the gynocentric society, the Marxists, the people behind gender politics and feminism who have convinced women to behave like this have played a blinder, and it's just one of many ways they have attacked and undermined our societies and nations.
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
The relentless and constant promotion of white female/non-white male relationships in ads is sickening… the constant portrayal of non-white men as doting dads, good spouse material, attractive, capable, competent, and loyal is very obvious. The constant featuring of mixed-race kids too, and the fact that any time an ad or programme requires a boorish, incompetent, stupid, unattractive character, that character will be portrayed by a white male. Who's driving this? Look at who is in charge of the majority of ad agencies. The BBC is as bad though. I happened to see a trailer for the Cbeebies panto-style production of Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet"… Guess what? Juliet's white, Romeo isn't. There are myriad other examples.
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
Not just them. In recent years it's been proven that legal 1mm1grat10n also adds massively to the financial burden on ordinary people, it pushes up housing costs, rents etc. (though obviously it's not the only factor affecting this), it depresses wages and has many other less obvious effects such as increasing journey times and therefore travel costs for commuters, increases the amount of food we need to import which has financial costs to us all, increases pressure on infrastructures such as the water supply, the sewage system, the national grid, energy supplies, etc. all of which have increased running costs that get passed on to us too. Then there's the factor that non-European 1mm1grants receive more benefits than British-heritage people too, which will also cost us... It's an utter lie that 1mm1grat10n benefits us all financially. Only the very rich and big business ever benefit from it, ordinary people just get the sh*tty end of the stick, as usual.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
The relentless and constant promotion of white female/non-white male relationships in ads is sickening… the constant portrayal of non-white men as doting dads, good spouse material, attractive, capable, competent, and loyal is very obvious. The constant featuring of mixed-race kids too, and the fact that any time an ad or programme requires a boorish, incompetent, stupid, unattractive character, that character will be portrayed by a white male. Who's driving this? Look at who is in charge of the majority of ad agencies. The BBC is as bad though. I happened to see a trailer for the Cbeebies panto-style production of Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet"… Guess what? Juliet's white, Romeo isn't. There are myriad other examples.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
It's not just them though. In recent years it's been proven that legal 1mm1grat10n also adds massively to the financial burden on ordinary people, it pushes up housing costs, rents etc. (though obviously it's not the only factor affecting this), it depresses wages and has many other less obvious effects such as increasing journey times and therefore travel costs for commuters, increases the amount of food we need to import which has financial costs to us all, increases pressure on infrastructures such as the water supply, the sewage system, the national grid, energy supplies, etc. all of which have increased running costs that get passed on to us too. Then there's the factor that non-European 1mm1grants receive more benefits than British-heritage people too, which will also cost us... It's an utter lie that 1mm1grat10n benefits us all financially. Only the very rich and big business ever benefit from it, ordinary people just get the sh*tty end of the stick, as usual.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@IIIIIIPETEIIIIII True, there's always money in the pot for wokery, whether it's trans nonsense, "pride", decolonisation, bee ell emm, "increasing diversity initiatives", surveys of old statues, etc., etc., etc.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
It was intentionally crudely put, but he does actually have a point. I have various younger male colleagues at work who are lonely and have had few relationships, whereas in previous decades, men like them would have had no trouble forming relationships. Nowadays, women seem to have been indoctrinated with the idea that bad guys are more fun and typical men are boring, also, the anti-Wht media is constantly pushing mixed race relationships on TV and in films, just look at TV ads nowadays, so many depict bk male/wht female relationships it's bizarre, meanwhile ordinary young wht lads can't get girlfriends. I'm older, married with kids of my own but I'm damn sure that if I was a single young man nowadays I'd be lonely and depressed as they are. When normal young men are rejected by women and society to this extent, incidents like this will keep happening. :(
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The current government is happy for us to be demeaned, demoralised, filled with guilt. They're happy for newcomers to our country to be turned against us by teachings like this. I'm no Labour supporter, just pointing out that pretty juch the whole political class is traitorous now. Red rosette, blue rosette, yellow rosette, green, they're all working for the globalists now, not us, and the last thing they want is a nation that will band together against them. Hence teaching like this, mass 1mm1grat10n, constant demeaning of our people and culture in the media, etc.
2
-
2
-
2
-
The whole point is to make us all poorer, a lot poorer, so we have to move to smaller houses, take in lodgers, give up our cars, give up the things we love. Sunak, like most of the political class, is a globalist with no loyalty to us whatsoever. Remember the globalist mantra: "You'll own nothing, and you'll be happy." We'll be happy all right, happy to have a belly full of bug protein and to be alive for one more day. Their plans for us aren't nice, and people like Sunak and Boris are working for them, not us. They're traitors,
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Not just the i11ega1s. In recent years it's been proven that legal 1mm1grat10n also adds massively to the financial burden on ordinary people, it pushes up housing costs, rents etc. (though obviously it's not the only factor affecting this), it depresses wages and has many other less obvious effects such as increasing journey times and therefore travel costs for commuters, increases the amount of food we need to import which has financial costs to us all, increases pressure on infrastructures such as the water supply, the sewage system, the national grid, energy supplies, etc. all of which have increased running costs that get passed on to us too. Then there's the factor that non-European 1mm1grants receive more benefits than British-heritage people too, which will also cost us... It's an utter lie that 1mm1grat10n benefits us all financially. Only the very rich and big business ever benefit from it, ordinary people just get the sh*tty end of the stick, as usual.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@SuzLa1 White men, if present in adverts at all now, are commonly depicted as stupid, boorish, ineffectual, unattractive, while black men are depicted as attractive, sexy, capable, good spouses, doting fathers, etc. Mixed race relationships are depicted far, far in excess of their actual prevalence in society, with white female/black male relationships being depicted most commonly, and mixed race children are also depicted disproportionately too. This has been getting more common over the last few years and seems to be the result of a concerted campaign by the media to instil in white women the idea that black men are the most attractive, while at the same time demeaning and demoralising white men. Some black women have noticed this too and are complaining about it as they feel that it's causing them to be seen as less attractive. It's not just adverts of course, movies and TV programmes also disproportionately feature wf/bm relationships disproportionately too. It would be foolish to think this is all just coincidence, it's a deliberate attempt to engineer change in our societies by unelected people for reasons of their own, it's corrosive, pernicious and more dangerous than people realise.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
They aren't frigid though, they've been indoctrinated to prefer bad lads and to deride normal, decent, ordinary lads, so a few confident, jack-the-lad types are getting lots of action while most lads get nothing. Society also derides men and masculinity in general, and constantly promotes non-wht men as attractive and good boyfriend/spouse choices, just look at tv ads nowadays, so many bm/wf couples depicted it's just bizarre. These are the reasons why MGTOW is a thing, depression and suicide amongst young men is so high and birth rates are plummeting in western societies. It's also the reason why so many women are hitting middle age childless, lonely and bitter. It's like someone has planned all this and is doing it deliberately.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The political class want to destroy our faith in every aspect of our society, hence their collusion in allowing arms of the state to act against our interests. The police are directed to target ordinary, basically law-abiding people, 1mm1grat10n officials are directed to allow people who have no right to be here and are of no benefit whatsoever to our society, indeed are costing us massively and committing much crime, to stay here and live amongst us with seemingly more support and more rights than indigenous people. The political class ignore our wishes and inflict laws on us that we do not want, they have no mandate whatsoever to implement. The media (including advertising) lampoon, denigrate and criticise our heritage and culture at every opportunity while depicting newcomers and foreigners as better people than us wherever possible. Everything, the state, the media, organisations like the EU and the UN, they're all geared towards turning us into cowed, demoralised, disenfranchised, depressed people. It's all part of a huge plan and turning our police against us is just a small part of it. Join the dots...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The London School of Economics were responsible for a "study", often cited by the pro-immigration lobby, that "proved" (ha bloody ha) that "Immigration was a financial benefit to the country". The study has since been discredited. Only Immigration of highly skilled people is a financial benefit and even then, the "financial benefit" tends to only benefit the rich, and business, while ordinary people see little or no benefit whatsoever, while being massively disproportionately affected by all of the negative aspects of Immigration such as increased housing costs, overcrowding, depressed wages, increased class sizes in schools, difficulties accessing healthcare, etc., etc., etc. I wouldn't trust anything that the LSE comes out with, EVER. They tend to say whatever their sponsors in big business want them to say.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@glennmiddleton3324 You made an incorrect assumption. I was aware of Jodie Whitaker before she was in Doctor Who, but my contention, that untalented people are often granted success by the BBC for their own reasons, was nothing to do with her in any case. For what it's worth, I think she is a good actor, though she was miscast and misjudged her portrayal of The Doctor. She was about the only good thing about "Attack the Block" apart from the creature design and effects. As I've already said, your snide dig at Andrew in the first place was misjudged, since undeserving people are often granted success by the BBC. Why do you find this difficult to understand? Andrew isn't "hating on Jodie to appear relevant", he has pointed out that there are various faults with Dr. Who as it is now, and judging by the number of people that agree with him, and the programme's abysmal ratings, a great many agree with him. Give up, your original point was specious and you have said nothing since to rectify that. You've made unfounded assumptions and failed to argue your case cogently.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
They are purposely trying to destroy Who, or at least make it unwatchable for fans who have loved it for decades. They've done the same with Star Wars, Star Trek, Marvel, Robin Hood, Merlin, King Arthur, Sherlock Holmes, various other franchises and properties, most recently He-man was revived with a woke twist that saw He-man killed and replaced with a butch woman. It's all about taking things away from the kind of fan that they don't like, IE white males. The proof is that it's almost always previously white male characters that get race-swapped, gender-swapped, or even killed off altogether. This is done deliberately to disenfranchise, demoralise and depress people they dislike, and especially to rob male viewers of hero figures.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
They aren't frigid though, they've been indoctrinated to prefer bad lads and to deride normal, decent, ordinary lads, so a few confident, jack-the-lad types are getting lots of action while most lads get nothing. Society also derides men and masculinity in general, and constantly promotes non-wht men as attractive and good boyfriend/spouse choices, just look at tv ads nowadays, so many bm/wf couples depicted it's just bizarre. These are the reasons why MGTOW is a thing, depression and suicide amongst young men is so high and birth rates are plummeting in western societies. It's also the reason why so many women are hitting middle age childless, lonely and bitter. It's like someone has planned all this and is doing it deliberately.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1